Your SlideShare is downloading. ×
0
Museum0610
Museum0610
Museum0610
Museum0610
Museum0610
Museum0610
Museum0610
Museum0610
Museum0610
Museum0610
Museum0610
Museum0610
Museum0610
Museum0610
Museum0610
Museum0610
Museum0610
Museum0610
Museum0610
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×

Thanks for flagging this SlideShare!

Oops! An error has occurred.

×
Saving this for later? Get the SlideShare app to save on your phone or tablet. Read anywhere, anytime – even offline.
Text the download link to your phone
Standard text messaging rates apply

Museum0610

203

Published on

Overview of MuSeUM project

Overview of MuSeUM project

Published in: Technology
0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total Views
203
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
0
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
4
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

Report content
Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
No notes for slide



















  • Transcript

    • 1. MuSeUM Multiple-collection SEarching Using Metadata
    • 2. Problem
    • 3. 5% on display
    • 4. 95% in depot
    • 5. Only 1% (1,130 objects) online!
    • 6. Documentation: 1,000,000 descriptions Freed from physical limitations: can we show everything online?
    • 7. Results
    • 8. 3 researchers CH/CS expertise Next: Postdoc UvA Now: UD in Greece (Sick-leave)
    • 9. 40+ publications
    • 10. 3 demo’s
    • 11. Dozens of variants of advanced CH retrieval systems
    • 12. Major barriers 1.5 years to finalize gM collection 2.5 years to finalize gM evaluation
    • 13. Major Findings
    • 14. Text retrieval is very effective on CH descriptions Advanced CH retrieval puts the object central Record structure helps expert searchers
    • 15. CH retrieval requires special evaluation Large-scale reusable test collection build Promising results on “Automated Evaluation” using logs
    • 16. Many technical results demonstrated on other data Use of structure for retrieval (INEX,ECIR,WSDM,ICTIR) Predicting where to stop in professional search (TREC,SIGIR) Result merging for distributed search (CIKM,ICTIR) Impact of collection size (TREC,SIGIR) Retrieval in Historic Dutch (ECIR) Evaluation of domain specific search (INEX,TREC,RIAO)
    • 17. Upshot for CH
    • 18. Upshot for Cultural Heritage Sector Insight in CH information seeking behavior Shown value of “hidden” documentation Large-scale reusable test-collections for MLA Demonstrated effectiveness of dedicated retrieval methods Shown relative value of fields in CH descriptions
    • 19. Expectations were high, results exceed expectations Results open up new scientific questions...

    ×