• Save
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5







Total Views
Views on SlideShare
Embed Views



0 Embeds 0

No embeds



Upload Details

Uploaded via as Adobe PDF

Usage Rights

CC Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike LicenseCC Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike LicenseCC Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike License

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
Post Comment
Edit your comment

USUL FIQH 2 SEM I 0607 USUL FIQH 2 SEM I 0607 Document Transcript

  • END-OF-SEMESTER EXAMINATION SEMESTER I, 2006/2007 SESSION AHMAD IBRAHIM KULLIYYAH OF LAWS Programme : Bachelor of Laws Level of : Third Study Reading Time : 2.30 p.m. – 2.45 p.m. Date : 4.11.2006 Duration : ( 15 minutes ) Answering Time : 2.45 p.m. – 5.45 p.m. Section(s) : All Sections Duration ( 3 hours ) Course Title : Usul al Fiqh II Course Code : SHA 3411 This Question Paper Consists of 5 Printed Pages With 6 Questions. INSTRUCTIONS TO CANDIDATES DO NOT OPEN UNTIL YOU ARE ASKED TO DO SO. Answer FOUR (4) Questions Only. Any form of cheating or attempt to cheat is a serious offence which may lead to dismissal APPROVED BY
  • 2 QUESTION 1 i. Describe the differences between personal reasoning (ijtihad), juristic opinion (fatwa) and consensus (ijmac ) in Islamic jurisprudence. In your answer also explain as to how these three concepts can relate to one another. (6 marks) ii. Some legal scholars such as Abdul Wahab Khallaf, Muhamad Iqbal and Mahmud Shaltut are of the opinion that consensus (ijmac ) according to its classical formulations is not feasible in today’s context. Discuss the recommendations by these scholars in order to make ijmac relevant to current needs and requirements of statutory legislation in a Muslim country. (9 marks) QUESTION 2 i. Al-Sarakhsi explained that istihsan contemplates the consequences of the legal rules and the selection of one that brings facility and ease in particular cases. In light of the above statement, explain the concept of istihsan and provide three examples of the application of this principle. (6 marks)
  • 3 ii. One of the conditions of the ‘illah is that it should be an attribute that is appropriate (munasib) with the purposes of the law (maqasid as-Sharic ah). Explain the above condition and state and explain how hikmah and ‘illah differ from one another. (9 marks) QUESTION 3 i. Discuss the juristic views and limitations, if any, pertaining to the application of qiyas in criminal matters. Are there any differences among the leading schools of Islamic law on this issue? (5 marks) ii. Discuss the objectives of Sharic ah (maqasid as-Sharic ah) and the approaches that are taken to achieve those objectives. Support your answer by giving the relevant evidence from al-Qur’an and Sunnah and the opinion of jurists such as Imam al- Ghazali and Ibn Qayyim al-Jawziyyah. (10 marks)
  • 4 QUESTION 4 i. Article 43 of the Mejelle provides, “A thing known by common usage is like a stipulation which has been made”. (Al-ma’ruf ‘urfan ka al- mashrui sharian) Explain the meaning of this legal maxim and support your answer with a suitable example. (6 marks) ii. Define a Companion (sahabi) of the Prophet and the principle of Fatwa al-sahabi. Explain the reasons why the majority of jurists consider the fatwa of sahabi authoritative such that it commands priority over the ijtihad of other mujtahidun. (9 marks) QUESTION 5 i. In order to be a valid basis of legislation and ijtihad, maslahah must fulfill a number of conditions. Specify these conditions and illustrate your answer with suitable examples. (9 marks) ii. The Muslim jurists are in agreement on the validity of certain varieties of sadd al- dhara’ic but they tend to disagree on others. Discuss the varieties of sadd al-
  • 5 dhara’ic and any differences the Muslim jurists might have expressed concerning them. Illustrate your answer with suitable examples. (6 marks) QUESTION 6 i. The Religious authorities of Johor have proposed the mandatory screening for HIV test for every couple who want to get married. However, there are some oppositions from people who claim that this is violating the rights of the individual. Discuss the above proposal from Islamic jurisprudence point of view and specify the relevant principles that can support the idea of making HIV screening a mandatory procedure. (9 marks) ii. Explain the relationship between the principle of istishab and the Islamic legal maxim al-bara’ah al-dhimmah al-asliyyah (6 marks)