• Share
  • Email
  • Embed
  • Like
  • Save
  • Private Content
LAND 2 SEM I 1112
 

LAND 2 SEM I 1112

on

  • 591 views

 

Statistics

Views

Total Views
591
Views on SlideShare
591
Embed Views
0

Actions

Likes
0
Downloads
12
Comments
0

0 Embeds 0

No embeds

Accessibility

Upload Details

Uploaded via as Adobe PDF

Usage Rights

CC Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike LicenseCC Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike LicenseCC Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike License

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Processing…
Post Comment
Edit your comment

    LAND 2 SEM I 1112 LAND 2 SEM I 1112 Document Transcript

    • INTERNATIONAL ISLAMIC UNIVERSITY MALAYSIA END-OF-SEMESTER EXAMINATION SEMESTER I, 2011/2012 SESSION AHMAD IBRAHIM KULLIYYAH OF LAWS Programme : Bachelor of Laws Level of : Third Study Reading Time : 9.00 a.m. – 9.15 a.m. Date : 11.01.2012 Duration : ( 15 minutes ) Answering Time : 9.15 a.m. – 12.15 p.m. Section(s) : All Sections Duration ( 3 hours ) Course Title : Land Law II Course Code : LAW 3111 This Question Paper Consists of 9 Printed Pages With 8 Questions. INSTRUCTIONS TO CANDIDATES DO NOT OPEN UNTIL YOU ARE ASKED TO DO SO. Answer FOUR (4) Questions Only. REFERENCES ALLOWED National Land Code 1965 Compilation of land Law Statutes Any form of cheating or attempt to cheat is a serious offence which may lead to dismissal Statutes should be free from any form of annotation. APPROVED BY
    • 2 QUESTION 1 In 2007, Faiq agreed to buy a piece of land from Kenaiki. In 2009, Kenaiki however, sold and transferred the land to Salaman who successfully registered the land in his name. In 2010, Faiq entered a caveat on the said land and in September of the same year brought an action in the High Court against Kenaiki for specific performance. Later, Faiq amended his action by adding Salaman as a party to the suit and alleged that the transfer was effected through fraud as Salaman is aware of the previous agreement. Meanwhile, Salaman succeeded in removing the caveat entered by Faiq since he wanted to charge the land to Sudirman Sdn. Bhd. Discuss and advise Faiq who now wants to enter a second caveat since the issue was not resolved. Support your answer with reference to decided cases and statutory provisions. (15 marks)
    • 3 QUESTION 2 Mr. Abo, the registered proprietor of a plot of land, intends to develop the land into a business center. He approached BS Bank for a loan and the Bank readily agreed to give the loan on the understanding that a lien is to be created over the said land. The agreement was made and Abo deposited the issue document of title of his land with the Bank in return for the said loan. A few months later, before BS Bank could enter the lien- holder’s caveat, Abo who was badly in need of money, obtained a further loan from Commercial Bank in return for creating a charge over the same land. He approached BS Bank for the issue document of title under the pretext that he was going to take it to the Registrar to correct the land boundary. He successfully obtained the issue document of title and gave it to Tan Commercial Bank to create a charge on the land. Now, BS Bank requests the return of the issue document of title to enable it enter lien-holder’s caveat. Abo refused to do so, claiming that BS Bank has since lost its chance to enter the lien- holder’s caveat in due time and that the handing over of the issue document of title by BS Bank indicates that it had already relinquished its right over the lien that has been lost by BS Bank’s voluntary action. Advise the parties with reference to decided cases. (15 marks)
    • 4 QUESTION 3 Khalid is the registered proprietor of a piece of land in Kuala Lumpur. He wants to develop the same land into a multi-storey building comprising of a number of shop lots and living apartments. Since he is in need of money, he approached Bank Simpanan for a loan of RM5 million on the security of a charge over Khalid’s land. The transaction was completed and in February 20, 2008 Bank Simpanan successfully registered a first legal charge. In July 2008, Khalid entered into a second charge over the same land with Citibank to secure the repayment of RM3 million. Citibank, however, agreed to the charge on condition that it would have a right to tacking should there be any further advances made to Khalid. The building seemed far from completion, the fact that made Khalid approach the Building Society Bhd. for another loan amounting to RM4 million with the security of a third legal charge over the same land. The Building Society Bhd agreed and upon advancement of the money, managed to register its right as a third chargee. Khalid, still short of money wants to create a fourth charge over the same land. He could not find anyone to lend him the money. He approached Bank Simpanan to lend him RM3 million to fund the completion of the building. Bank Simpanan agreed to lend the money by way of tacking. Unfortunate to Khalid, and due to a sudden economic downturn, he defaulted in the payment of his monthly installments to Bank Simpanan. The Bank successfully managed to obtain a court order to auction the land at a reserved price of RM13 million. It was discovered after the auction that Khalid owed the State Authority a sum of RM200, 000.00 as rent arrears. The general expenses of the sale process amounted to RM100,000.00 Distribute the purchase money according to the priorities of the parties involved. (15 marks)
    • 5 QUESTION 4 Amro Finance had granted one Wan Ismail (“borrower”) a temporary overdraft facility of $125,000.00 with interest at the rate of 14% per year. In support of that facility, Nik Jamil on 17th January 1999 agreed to charge his property under land office title, identified as Lot 1572 Geran No. 15325 Mukim Selayang, Selangor ("the said land"), as security. According to Amro Finance, pursuant to that document Nik Jamil had agreed to be jointly and severally liable for the loan. Wan Ismail defaulted on the repayment of the loan. Amro Finance issued letter of demands to both, Wan Ismail and Nik Jamil. However, both of them ignored the letters of demand. To satisfy the debt, Amro Finance took the immediate easy step of foreclosing the charge. But to their surprise, it was found that the charge was never registered with the land office. a) Based on the above scenario, advice Amro Finance on the remedies that are available for them. Support your answer with decided cases and statutory provisions. (10 marks) b) Advise Amro Finance on the type of foreclosure proceedings they can take against the borrower. (5 marks)
    • 6 QUESTION 5 Ahmad owned a piece of land in Kampung Chuchor Badak, Kuala Merbau. He made an application to convert his land which is presently under the category of `agriculture’ to `building’. He is proposing to develop his land into a mixed residential and commercial centre. Dewan Bandaraya Kuala Lumpur (DBKL) approved his application on December 1, 2010 and he is now busy negotiating with Development Bank to obtain loan facilities to finance the development project. Adjacent to his land is another land about 5 acres belonging to DBKL. DBKL decided to develop the land and turn it into a commercial center cum bus terminal. On January 31, 2011, the Land Office served Ahmad with a notification in Form A, followed by a declaration of intended acquisition in Form D. Ahmad was upset with the decision of DBKL to acquire his land which has been approved for development. He asserts that the size of the land belonging to DBKL is sufficient for the proposed development. Ahmad strongly believes that the authority concerned should not approve the application for the acquisition of land for any purpose larger in area than that needed for that purpose. With reference to statutory provisions and decided cases, advise Ahmad on the following matters:- a) Whether can he challenge the validity of the land acquisition proceedings alleging that the land is acquired for purposes other than those permitted by the law? (5 marks)
    • 7 b) Alternatively, can he be considered to participate in the project and negotiate the form of co-operation and the necessary commercial arrangement? (5 marks) c) If the negotiations made pursuant to (b) are unsuccessful, how can he protect his interest as the landowner in claiming for adequate compensation? (5 marks) QUESTION 6 a) The legal and institutional framework to administer and regulate the Malay Reserved Land institution was introduced in the early 1900s with the intention of ensuring protection of Malay land proprietary rights. The Federated Malay Reserved Enactment of 1913 (“FMS MRE 1913”) was the first law enacted to administer and regulate the Malay Reserved lands. The FMS MRE 1913 was amended in 1933 and is still being used as the principal legislation in regulating Malay Reserved Lands. Discuss the relevance of the Malay Reserved Land Enactment 1933 in regulating the changing needs of the Malay society in dealing with Malay reserved land especially in the era of globalisation. Support your answer with statutory provisions and decided cases. (7 marks)
    • 8 b) Dato’ James Foong in Syarikat Macey Berhad v. Nightingale Allied Services (Sued As A Firm) & 2 Ors.[1995] 1 CLJ 890 held that in a Malay Holding there must be a Malay proprietor or co-proprietor. If all are non-Malays, then the land cannot be declared as Malay Holding. However, if one of the proprietors is a Malay and the others are non-Malays, then the alienated Malay reserve land can be declared as Malay Holding. Explain the requirements that need to be fulfilled by the State Authority in declaring any alienated land as Malay reserved land. (8 marks) QUESTION 7 a) Despite, the guaranteed protection for private landowners’ property rights by the Federal Constitution 1957, the introduction of the Land Acquisition Act 1960, appears to confer the State Authority with wide powers in acquiring land belonging to private landowners. The Land Acquisition Act 1960 appears to be violating the concept of inviolability of private landowners’ rights to property that is expressly provided in the Federal Constitution of Malaysia 1957. Discuss with reference to decided cases and relevant statutory provision on the powers of the Land Administrator and purposes of land acquisition in Malaysia (5 marks)
    • 9 b) Discuss with reference to decided cases, the rationale of the discretionary powers vested upon the State Authority by the Land Acquisition Act 1960 in acquiring private land and whether there are any possible grounds upon which a landowner can challenge such acquisition proceedings. (10 marks) QUESTION 8 a) It was once remarked that strata titles are 'titles in the sky'. This is to express a strata concept which is somewhat different from the conventional form of titles which relate to landed properties. Discuss the procedure and the problems involved in making an application for the issuance of strata titles in Malaysia. Support your answer with relevant statutory provisions and decided cases. (8 marks) b) Explain the role of the Management Corporation in administering and managing the problems faced in high-rise buildings in Peninsular Malaysia. (7 marks)