SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 40
Compliance with EU Agricultural 
and Environmental Requirements - 
The Swedish Experience 
Christine Jakobsson, JTI 
Regional Conference on Agricultural Source 
Pollution in Danube, Baltic and Black Sea 
Riparian Countries, Bucharest 
September 30 - October 3, 2003 
C. Jakobsson 5/2003 1
Disposition 
• EU:s Nitrate Directive 
• Sweden’s legislation 
and adaptation to EU 
• Swedish advisory 
service & information 
• Synthesis from the 
implementation of EU:s 
Nitrate Directive 
C. Jakobsson 5/2003 2
The policy implementation of nutrient management in European Countries 
EU:s Nitrate Directive 
Different approaches in policy 
• Nitrogen or phosphorus based systems 
– N based systems as in the Nitrate Directive, (170 kg N/ha) are 
C. Jakobsson 5/2003 3 
most common 
– P based systems e.g. Sweden, the allowed level of P is defined 
as livestock density corresponding to 22 kg P in manure/ha, 
- no problems with requirements of 170 kg N/ha returned in 
animal excreta (Nitrate Directive). Another advantage is that 
information on P content in manure is more reliable, as losses in 
animal houses and during storage are almost non-existent and 
therefore easier for the farmer to calculate. 
– N and P-based systems
The policy implementation of nutrient management in European Countries 
EU:s Nitrate Directive 
Implementation of nutrient management legislation 
• The Nitrate Directive issued in 1991. Most activities to be 
implemented before 2000. 
• Objectives are to reduce water pollution caused or induced by 
nitrates from agricultural sources and to prevent such pollution. 
• Member states must identify Nitrate Vulnerable Zones (NZVs) 
on the basis of monitoring requirements results. 
• Action Programmes with mandatory measures on agricultural 
practices must be implemented in NVZs. Maximum amounts of 
animal manure that can be applied to land yearly (210 kg N/ha 
until mid-December 2002 when the amount will be reduced to 
170 kg N/ha). 
• Monitoring of water quality according to specific requirements. 
• Codes of Good Agricultural Practice (CGAP) must be elaborated 
and are mandatory in the NVZs and voluntary outside. 
C. Jakobsson 5/2003 4
C. Jakobsson 5/2003 5 
Nitrate Vulnerable 
Zones in Europe 
Source: J. Duchemin
EU:s Nitrate directive 
• Promote the use of suitable methods within agriculture 
to create a general protective level against all pollution 
of all water 
• Special protection is necessary for certain areas against 
nitrogen compounds 
• Members states must identify vulnerable zones and 
establish and implement action programmes for these 
areas (within 2 years) 
• Action programmes should contain measures to reduce 
the land-application of all N-fertilisers and in particular to 
set specific limits for the application of livestock manure 
• It is necessary to monitor waters 
C. Jakobsson 5/2003 6
EU:s Nitrate directive 
Establish a Code of Good Agricultural Practice 
The objective of reducing nitrate pollution should cover: 
• periods when the land application of fertiliser is inappropriate; 
• the land application of fertilisers to steeply sloping ground; 
• the land application of fertiliser to water-saturated, flooded, frozen 
C. Jakobsson 5/2003 7 
or snow-covered ground; 
• the conditions for land application of fertiliser near water courses; 
• the capacity and construction of storage vessels for livestock 
manure, including measures to prevent water pollution by run-off 
and seepage into the groundwater and surface water of liquids 
containing livestock manure and effluents from stored plant 
materials such as silage; 
• procedures for the land application, including rate and uniformity 
of spreading, of both chemical fertiliser and livestock manure, that 
will maintain nutrient losses to water at an acceptable level
EU:s Nitrate directive 
Establish a Code of Good Agricultural Practice 
The objective of reducing nitrate pollution may cover: 
• land use management, including the use of crop rotation systems 
and the proportion of the land area devoted to permanent crops 
relative to annual tillage crops; 
• the maintenance of a minimum quantity of vegetation cover 
during (rainy) periods that will take up the nitrogen from the soil 
that could otherwise cause NO3-pollution of water; 
• the establishment of fertiliser plans on a farm-by-farm basis and 
the keeping of records on fertiliser use; 
• the prevention of water pollution from run-off and the downward 
water movement beyond the reach of crop roots in irrigation 
systems. 
C. Jakobsson 5/2003 8
EU:s Nitrate directive 
Measures to be include in action 
programmes - rules: 
• periods when the land application of certain types 
of fertiliser is prohibited; 
• the capacity of storage vessels for livestock 
C. Jakobsson 5/2003 9 
manure;
EU:s Nitrate directive 
Measures to be include in action 
programmes - rules cont.: 
• limitation of the land application of fertilisers, 
consistent with good agricultural practice and 
taking into account the characteristics of the 
vulnerable zone concerned, in particular: 
– soil conditions, soil type and slope; 
– climatic conditions, rainfall and irrigation; 
– land use and agricultural practices, including crop rotation 
systems; and to be based on a balance between: 
• the foreseeable N requirements of the crops, and 
• the nitrogen supply to the crops from the soil and 
from fertilisation corresponding to: 
– the amount of N present in the soil at the end of 
winter 
– through net mineralisation of the organic N reserves 
in the soil 
– from livestock manure 
– from chemical and other fertilisers 
C. Jakobsson 5/2003 10
EU:s Nitrate directive 
Measures to be include in action programmes - 
rules continuation: 
• These measures will ensure that, for each farm or livestock 
unit the amount of livestock manure applied to the land 
each year, including by the animals themselves, shall not 
exceed 170 kg N per hectare (210 kg N per ha the first 4 
years) 
• These amounts may be calculated on the basis of animal 
C. Jakobsson 5/2003 11 
numbers
EU:s Nitrate directive 
Criteria for identifying waters - 
Monitoring programmes and measures 
• if the groundwater contains more than 50 mg/l 
C. Jakobsson 5/2003 12 
nitrates 
• if surface freshwaters, in particular those used for 
drinking water, contain more than 50 mg/l nitrates 
• if natural freshwater lakes, other freshwater 
bodies, estuaries, coastal waters and marine 
waters are found to be eutrophic or may become so
• Sweden is a very sparsely populated and forest dominated 
C. Jakobsson 5/2003 13 
country. 
• The environmental problems are small in comparison to 
many other countries in Europe. 
• Nutrient leakage from agriculture, especially nitrogen, affects 
coastal areas and also rivers and lakes negatively. 
• Surface run-off of phosphorus can be a problem causing 
eutrophication, mainly in inland waters, where phosphorus is 
generally the growth limiting factor.
Programme to reduce nutrient losses from agriculture 
• Launched in 1988 by the Swedish Parliament 
• The goal was to reduce the amount of N that reaches the Baltic Sea 
by 50% from 1985 to 1995 and to substantially reduce the amount 
of P. 
• This goal has not been reached, but 25% reductions in N losses to 
the Baltic Sea have been calculated. In Svealand the reduction of 
nitrogen losses to the sea was up to 40% (SEPA, 1997). 
• Since 1995 specific measures to reduce the ammonia losses from 
agriculture were successively elaborated and implemented. 
• Measures to tackle the problems are: 
– requirements and guidelines 
– advisory service and information 
– research and development 
– economic instruments of control 
C. Jakobsson 5/2003 14
• To ensure that manure is not produced in excess to the amount of 
arable land on the farm, a balance must exist between the 
amount of animals on the farm and the amount of land 
available for spreading manure. 
• The maximum amount of animals has been precised with 
consideration taken to the amount of P and N in manure and a 
crops normal requirements and removal of plant nutrients. 
• The limiting factor is P, with a maximum amount of 
approximately 23-25 kg P per hectare. 
• As the amount of manure per area will be moderate, the risk of 
nutrient leaching of both N and P will be smaller. 
• One advantage with using P instead of N is that the figures on P 
content in manure are more reliable, as P losses in the stable and 
during storage are almost non-existing. 
C. Jakobsson 5/2003 15
The number of animals per hectare may not be larger than: 
Type of animal Animals/ha 
Dairy cows 1,6 
Cows for breeding calves 2,3 
Heifers, bulls, steers > 1 years age 4,6 
Calves < 1 years age 5,8 
Sheep and goats 15 
Sows in production 2,2 
Fattening pigs, places 10,5 
Laying hens, places 100 
Young hens, places 250 
Broilers, places 470 
Turkeys, ducks, geese, places 140 
Horses 3 
Mink, breeding females 50 
Spreading area for manure 
•Own arable land and leased arable land 
•Spreading contracts (min. 5 years) with neighbors & spreading journal 
C. Jakobsson 5/2003 16 
•Exception - if manure is fabricated to a product that leaves the farm
Manure, slurry and urine storage requirements in sensitive regions 
C. Jakobsson 5/2003 17 
and for large farms 
• 8 months for animal production consisting of cattle, horses, sheep or 
goats 
• 10 months for other types of animal production. 
Applies to all farms with > 10 animal units in a specified pollution sensitive area 
consisting of southern Sweden and a 20 km coastal zone from the Norwegian 
border to Stockholm county. They also apply to all farms in Sweden with > 100 
animal units. 
In the rest of Sweden 
The size of the storage facilities for manure should with good margins be 
able to handle the need for storage during the time-period when 
livestock manure should not be spread - 6 to 10 months production of 
manure.
Ammonia reduction measures for storage of 
slurry and urine 
• slurry and urine pits must be covered with a stable 
surface crust layer or other covering that effectively 
reduces ammonia emissions 
• filling must take place beneath the covering. 
Since 1995, this affects farms with > 10 animal units in three counties in 
southern Sweden, and since 1997 in the rest of Götaland and on the 
plains of Svealand. 
Slurry pits can either be covered with a natural crust, straw, peat, 
plastic, leca pebbles, a roof or other covering materials that 
effectively reduce ammonia emissions. Filling beneath the 
covering is to prevent the slurry or urine from breaking the cover 
or ending up on top of the cover. 
C. Jakobsson 5/2003 18
Ban on application of manure and other organic 
manure during winter 
• To prevent nutrient leaching, manure and other organic 
wastes may not be applied to land in Sweden during the 1st 
of December to the 28th of February, unless they are 
incorporated in the soil the same day to a depth of at least 10 
cm. 
• Harrowing the surface is not enough. 
C. Jakobsson 5/2003 19
Sweden’s adaptation of legislation to the 
Nitrate Directive 
New requirements on manure application in 
sensitive regions since January 1999 
1. Fertilisers must not be spread in amounts exceeding the 
crops nitrogen requirements for the growing season. The 
amount of fertiliser applicated should be based on a balance 
between the crops foreseeable nitrogen requirements and 
the nitrogen supply from all external potential nutrient 
sources, as well as taking into account: 
a) soil conditions, soil type and slope, 
b) climatic conditions, precipitation and irrigation, 
c) land use and agricultural practices, including crop rotation systems; 
2. Fertiliser must not be applicated on water-saturated or flooded 
C. Jakobsson 5/2003 20 
ground;
Sweden’s adaptation of legislation to the 
Nitrate Directive 
New requirements on manure application in sensitive 
regions since January 1999 
3. Fertiliser must not be applicated on snow-covered or deeply 
C. Jakobsson 5/2003 21 
frozen ground; 
4. Nitrogen containing commercial fertilisers must not be 
applicated from the 1st of November to the 15th of February; 
5. Manure and other organic fertilisers must not be applicated 
from the 1st of January to the 15th of February; 
6. Manure and other organic fertilisers can be spread from the 
1st of August to the 30th of November only to a growing 
crop or before autumn sowing.
New requirements on manure application in sensitive 
regions since January 1999 
Land application of FYM with the exception of poultry manure, is 
allowed on bare soils, without the requirements of autumn 
sowing afterwards, from 20 October to 30 November in the 
counties of Blekinge, Skåne och Halland if incorporation takes 
place, as well as from 10 October to 30 November in the 
defined coastal areas of Stockholms, Södermanlands, 
Östergötlands, Kalmar, Västra Götalands and Gotlands county, 
if incorporation takes place the same day. 
Farmyard manure (FYM) is defined as manure and other organic 
fertilisers that can be stacked to at least 1 meters height 
without a supportive wall and that has a dry matter content 
higher than 20%. 
C. Jakobsson 5/2003 22
Ammonia reduction measures for application of manure 
Incorporation within 4 hours 
Since 1996, manure, slurry or urine must be incorporated within 4 
hours after land application when spreading on bare soils. This 
applies to three counties in southern Sweden. 
When applying manure, slurry and urine it is of great importance that 
incorporation takes place as soon as possible, as the largest 
ammonia emissions take place immediately after application. The 
ammonia emissions are high, when the contents of ammonia nitrogen 
are high in the urine, slurry or manure. It is not until the ammonia ion is 
adsorbed by soil particles or assimilated by crops, that the risk of 
ammonia emissions is practically inhibited. 
C. Jakobsson 5/2003 23
Techniques for application to growing crops 
In the three counties in southern Sweden, from 1998, slurry must be spread to 
growing crops with techniques that efficiently reduce losses of ammonia: 
 Bandspreading techniques or other similar techniques, where 
slurry is placed directly on the ground beneath the crop cover, 
 Injectors or other similar techniques, where slurry is placed directly 
C. Jakobsson 5/2003 24 
in the ground, 
 Techniques, where one part slurry is diluted with at least one half 
part water before application (broadcasting), 
 Techniques, that are followed by irrigation with at least 10 mm 
water within 4 hours (broadcasting).
At least 60 respectively 50% winter-green land is required 
during the autumn or winter on every farm with more 
than 5 hectares arable land in the three most southern 
counties and in the rest of Götaland respectively. Only 
open fields, not natural pastures or grazing land, are affected 
by the requirements. Both the time for sowing and for 
interrupting plant growth are regulated. 
The following crops are accepted: grassland, winter cereals, 
winter oilseeds, energy forest (usually Salix), sugar beets, 
carrots or other similar root crops (not potatoes), perennial fruit 
and berry crops, special catch crops (usually perennial 
ryegrass, Lolium perenne), set-aside arable land with covering 
plants. 
C. Jakobsson 5/2003 25
• Farms with more than 200 animal units are required to apply 
for a permit at the County Administrative Board to be able to 
operate. 
• The permit usually consists of requirements regarding the 
maximum amount of animals, the storage capacity and 
application of manure etc. 
C. Jakobsson 5/2003 26
Plant nutrients - Current legislation affecting the agricultural sector in Sweden 
Summary 
• Livestock density: according to P contents of manure (23-25 kg P/ha) 
• Manure storage: storage capacity, covering of urine and slurry pits, 
C. Jakobsson 5/2003 27 
filling beneath the cover 
• Application of manure: ban, new requirements, incorporation, 
spreading techniques when spreading in a growing crops 
• Application of fertilisers: nitrogen application according to the crops 
requirements, ban on winter spreading 
• Winter-green land: 60 resp. 50% 
• Permits for farms with more than 200 livestock units
Advisory service and information 
• Advice free of charge for all farms with more than 
20 livestock units since 1988 
– Plant nutrient balance (farm-gate balance)- STANK 
computer programme 
– Plant production plan with special reference to 
strategies for usage of manure 
• Plant nutrient newsletters 
• Demonstrations e.g. manure spreaders and field trials 
• Since 2001 “Focus on Nutrients” 
C. Jakobsson 5/2003 28
Focus on Nutrients 
• Joint venture between The Swedish Board of Agriculture, The County 
Administration Boards, The Federation of Swedish Farmers and a 
number of companies in the farming business. 
• The largest single undertaking in Sweden to reduce losses of 
nutrients to air and water from livestock and crop production. Mainly in 
the Southern part of Sweden 
• A campaign to provide training and advice and the project´s aim is to 
encompass the entire flow of nutrients on the farm. Extended 
extension service and documentation at the farm level, indicators 
• Voluntary programme for farmers with environmental payments (EU-CAP). 
3 800 farmers have joined. 
• The background is the new Swedish national goals for environmental 
C. Jakobsson 5/2003 29 
quality
Environmental Quality Goal Area covered by Focus on Nutrients 
- Zero Eutrophication - Phosphorus losses, nitrogen 
leaching,ammonia volatilisation 
- Natural Acidification Only - Ammonia volatilisation 
- Good-Quality Groundwater - Nitrogen leaching 
- Reduced Climate Impact - Nitrous oxide emissions 
(nitrogen leaching) 
- A Non Toxic Environment - Handling of plant protection 
chemicals 
C. Jakobsson 5/2003 30
Focus on Nutrients 
The purpose is to: 
* reduce losses of nitrate from farmland 
* reduce ammonia emissions from manure 
* reduce losses of phosphorus from farmland 
* avoid spreading of pesticides into surface and groundwater 
This shall be reached by increasing nutrient management efficiency 
on the farms by increasing awareness and knowledge. The 
farmer is in focus and therefore the core of the project is 
education and advising by individual visits by farm advisers. 
www.greppa.nu 
C. Jakobsson 5/2003 31
“Focus on Nutrients” “Greppa näringen” 
Advice - Sequence of advisory modules 
• Start-planning advisory needs 
• Basic nutrient balance 
• Repeat nutrient balance 
• Nitrogen strategy 
• Phosphorus strategy 
• Soil compaction 
• Handling of plant protection chemicals 
• Planning wetlands 
• Grass crop strategy 
• Animal housing environment 
• Planning of buildings 
• Inspection of feeding plan for dairy cows 
• Inspection of feeding plan for beef cattle 
• Grazing strategy 
• Feed consumption recording for piglets 
• Feed consumption recording for fattening pigs 
C. Jakobsson 5/2003 32
Options and perspectives of the nutrient policy in 
Sweden - Conclusions 
• Sweden is generally satisfied with the legislation in this area 
• No large problems exist 
• No major changes in the legislation are planned for the future 
• Minor adjustments will most likely take place e.g. 
– Enlargement of NVZ area 
– Definitions of animal units 
– Livestock density 
• Sweden is more interested in voluntary agreements with farmers 
• No changes in the ammonia legislation were introduced after the 
review and analysis (1998) - instead wait for the results from the 
legislation that recently came into place (1995 - ) 
C. Jakobsson 5/2003 33
Options and perspectives of the nutrient policy in Sweden 
Conclusions 
C. Jakobsson 5/2003 34 
Measures and control 
• No difficulties 
– Livestock density, 
– storage of manure/urine/slurry, 
– green land, spreading technology 
• Some difficulties 
– incorporation of manure/urine/slurry within a time frame (4 hours) - 
documentation of spreading on the farm
Advice from Ingrid Svedinger, 
Ministry of Agriculture, Sweden 
• Take regular contact and have discussions 
with DG Environment, Michael Hamell, 
chairman(Irland), Liliana Cortelini and Claudia 
Olasabel 
• Be active within the Nitrate Committee 
• Difference between guidelines (stricter - 
should be done, if not otherwise proven) and 
guidance (only recommendations) 
C. Jakobsson 5/2003 35
Main obligations of the Nitrate Directive and their 
implementation by Member States as of 01/06/2001 
Member state AT BE DK DE EL ES FI FR IR IT LX NL NL PT SE UK 
Water monitoring + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + 
Designation of NVZ + + + + + + + +  + + + + + + + 
Codes of Good 
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + 
Agricultural Practice 
Action programmes + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + 
Report to the 
Commission on 
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + 
implementation status 
Notes: + indicates that the task is performed but not necessarily approved by the Commission;  
indicates that important designations are expected by the end of 2001; shaded cells indicate 
that infringement procedures are ongoing (some proceedings at an early stage are not mentioned 
in this table for legal reasons) 
Source: Jean Duchemin, personal communication 
C. Jakobsson 5/2003 36
C. Jakobsson 5/2003 37
D. CONCLUSION 
• At least 30-40% of rivers and lakes show eutrophication 
symptoms or bring high nitrogen fluxes to coastal waters and 
seas. The agricultural origin is 50 - 80% of total N inputs to EU 
waters, depending on Member States, watersheds and annual 
variations; 
• All M. S. have now transposed the directive, set up a 
comprehensive monitoring network, established a code of good 
practice, and designated at least partially their vulnerable zones 
(except Ireland); 
• A CAP more oriented towards quality rather than quantity, 
encouraging extensive cropping or breeding, “buffer” natural 
areas and accurate balanced fertilisation, can further contribute 
to these purposes; 
• Cost-efficiency studies on preventive measures should also be 
encouraged, in order to focus action programmes and practice 
changes towards the most efficient one; 
C. Jakobsson 5/2003 38
D. CONCLUSION cont. 
• Besides financial support for a more environmental-friendly agriculture 
and dissemination of knowledge, it is necessary that all M.S. arrive at a 
full implementation of the Nitrate Directive, reinforce surveys and 
controls at field level (including checking of fertilisation plans and 
records, manure storage and handling, soil analysis, natural buffer 
strips, etc.), and introduce dissuasive penalties for the producers who do 
not ensure eco-compliance. 
• Investments in urban wastewater treatment will be inefficient regarding 
nutrients if a parallel effort is not devoted to an effective reduction of 
agricultural nutrients losses. 
• Water Framework Directive (WFD). A synergy has to be developed in 
the future work for common implementation of these water directives, on 
items such as: 
— Harmonisation of water sampling points, networks, parameters and 
frequencies for water quality monitoring in order to meet, with minimum 
work at field level, the needs linked with EU Directives, OECD-Eurostat 
Questionnaires, EEA “Eurowaternet”, Marine and River Conventions, 
and local/regional needs. 
C. Jakobsson 5/2003 39
D. CONCLUSION cont. 
— Harmonisation of water sampling points, networks, parameters 
and frequencies for water quality monitoring in order to meet, 
with minimum work at field level, the needs linked with EU 
Directives, OECD-Eurostat Questionnaires, EEA Eurowaternet”, 
Marine and River Conventions, and local/regional needs. 
— Assessment of point and diffuse losses of nutrients to waters, 
and of the breakdown of their origin (agriculture, urban waters, 
industry, air deposition…: 
— Models correlating environmental impacts (e.g. algae blooms) 
and causative factors (nutrients, natural conditions, etc.), which 
will allow forecast of impact of various scenarios in the reduction 
or increase of these factors. 
— Cost-efficiency approach for preventive measures. Nitrogen and 
Phosphorus will certainly appear as priority polluters in many 
E.U. watersheds. 
C. Jakobsson 5/2003 40

More Related Content

Viewers also liked

European phosphorus balance: uses and losses in agriculture & other sectors
European phosphorus balance: uses and losses in agriculture & other sectorsEuropean phosphorus balance: uses and losses in agriculture & other sectors
European phosphorus balance: uses and losses in agriculture & other sectorsKimo van Dijk
 
Energy Balance Over Crop ,Leaf Area Index and Biomass Estimation.
Energy Balance Over Crop ,Leaf Area Index and  Biomass Estimation.Energy Balance Over Crop ,Leaf Area Index and  Biomass Estimation.
Energy Balance Over Crop ,Leaf Area Index and Biomass Estimation.Mohammed sarfaraz
 
An introduction to the new generation pesticides 25 10-2013. new
An introduction to the new generation pesticides 25 10-2013. newAn introduction to the new generation pesticides 25 10-2013. new
An introduction to the new generation pesticides 25 10-2013. newDilin Sathyanath
 
1.4 material and energy balance
1.4 material  and energy balance1.4 material  and energy balance
1.4 material and energy balancemichjosh
 
The CarboZALF-D manipulation experiment – experimental design and SOC patterns
The CarboZALF-D manipulation experiment – experimental design and SOC patternsThe CarboZALF-D manipulation experiment – experimental design and SOC patterns
The CarboZALF-D manipulation experiment – experimental design and SOC patternsAgriculture Journal IJOEAR
 
Production & operations management
Production & operations managementProduction & operations management
Production & operations managementshart sood
 

Viewers also liked (10)

European phosphorus balance: uses and losses in agriculture & other sectors
European phosphorus balance: uses and losses in agriculture & other sectorsEuropean phosphorus balance: uses and losses in agriculture & other sectors
European phosphorus balance: uses and losses in agriculture & other sectors
 
Energy Balance Over Crop ,Leaf Area Index and Biomass Estimation.
Energy Balance Over Crop ,Leaf Area Index and  Biomass Estimation.Energy Balance Over Crop ,Leaf Area Index and  Biomass Estimation.
Energy Balance Over Crop ,Leaf Area Index and Biomass Estimation.
 
An introduction to the new generation pesticides 25 10-2013. new
An introduction to the new generation pesticides 25 10-2013. newAn introduction to the new generation pesticides 25 10-2013. new
An introduction to the new generation pesticides 25 10-2013. new
 
1.4 material and energy balance
1.4 material  and energy balance1.4 material  and energy balance
1.4 material and energy balance
 
Theory of production 2
Theory of production 2Theory of production 2
Theory of production 2
 
NABARD
NABARDNABARD
NABARD
 
The CarboZALF-D manipulation experiment – experimental design and SOC patterns
The CarboZALF-D manipulation experiment – experimental design and SOC patternsThe CarboZALF-D manipulation experiment – experimental design and SOC patterns
The CarboZALF-D manipulation experiment – experimental design and SOC patterns
 
Production Analysis
Production AnalysisProduction Analysis
Production Analysis
 
Production & operations management
Production & operations managementProduction & operations management
Production & operations management
 
Microeconomics: Production Theory
Microeconomics: Production TheoryMicroeconomics: Production Theory
Microeconomics: Production Theory
 

Similar to EU Agricultural and Environmental Requirements in Sweden presentation

World Bank Experiences with Agricultural Non Point Source Pollution Control P...
World Bank Experiences with Agricultural Non Point Source Pollution Control P...World Bank Experiences with Agricultural Non Point Source Pollution Control P...
World Bank Experiences with Agricultural Non Point Source Pollution Control P...Iwl Pcu
 
GEF Black Sea/Danube Partnership presentation
GEF Black Sea/Danube Partnership presentationGEF Black Sea/Danube Partnership presentation
GEF Black Sea/Danube Partnership presentationIwl Pcu
 
IFA Nitrates Regulation Consultation & Discussion
IFA Nitrates Regulation Consultation & Discussion IFA Nitrates Regulation Consultation & Discussion
IFA Nitrates Regulation Consultation & Discussion IrishFarmers
 
1.3 The Danish Policy Mix to Address the Environmental Impacts of Fertilisers...
1.3 The Danish Policy Mix to Address the Environmental Impacts of Fertilisers...1.3 The Danish Policy Mix to Address the Environmental Impacts of Fertilisers...
1.3 The Danish Policy Mix to Address the Environmental Impacts of Fertilisers...OECD Environment
 
Presentation - Workshop 2: The implementation of the Polluter Pays Principle,...
Presentation - Workshop 2: The implementation of the Polluter Pays Principle,...Presentation - Workshop 2: The implementation of the Polluter Pays Principle,...
Presentation - Workshop 2: The implementation of the Polluter Pays Principle,...OECD Environment
 
GEF Romania Agricultural Pollution Control Project
GEF Romania Agricultural Pollution Control ProjectGEF Romania Agricultural Pollution Control Project
GEF Romania Agricultural Pollution Control ProjectIwl Pcu
 
Accounting for Carbon in Australia’s Coastal Wetlands
Accounting for Carbon in Australia’s Coastal WetlandsAccounting for Carbon in Australia’s Coastal Wetlands
Accounting for Carbon in Australia’s Coastal WetlandsCIFOR-ICRAF
 
Environment conference presentation.pptx
Environment conference presentation.pptxEnvironment conference presentation.pptx
Environment conference presentation.pptxJulie Girling
 
Environment conference presentation by Julie Girling, MEP
Environment conference presentation by Julie Girling, MEPEnvironment conference presentation by Julie Girling, MEP
Environment conference presentation by Julie Girling, MEPMargaret Mathews
 
The Danish Way to Reduce Greenhouse Gas Emissions From Agriculture
The Danish Way to Reduce Greenhouse Gas Emissions From AgricultureThe Danish Way to Reduce Greenhouse Gas Emissions From Agriculture
The Danish Way to Reduce Greenhouse Gas Emissions From AgricultureMaa- ja metsätalousministeriö
 
HELCOM - on the way to nutrient load reduction
HELCOM - on the way to nutrient load reduction HELCOM - on the way to nutrient load reduction
HELCOM - on the way to nutrient load reduction Iwl Pcu
 
Romania Agricultural Pollution Control Project Presentation
Romania Agricultural Pollution Control Project PresentationRomania Agricultural Pollution Control Project Presentation
Romania Agricultural Pollution Control Project PresentationIwl Pcu
 
Turkey Anatolia Watershed Rehabilitation Project Presentation
Turkey Anatolia Watershed Rehabilitation Project PresentationTurkey Anatolia Watershed Rehabilitation Project Presentation
Turkey Anatolia Watershed Rehabilitation Project PresentationIwl Pcu
 
A Service for Improving the Assignments of Common Agriculture Policy Funds to...
A Service for Improving the Assignments of Common Agriculture Policy Funds to...A Service for Improving the Assignments of Common Agriculture Policy Funds to...
A Service for Improving the Assignments of Common Agriculture Policy Funds to...RuleML
 
Current Status of Soil Researches in Turkey - Bülent Sönmez
Current Status of Soil Researches in Turkey - Bülent Sönmez Current Status of Soil Researches in Turkey - Bülent Sönmez
Current Status of Soil Researches in Turkey - Bülent Sönmez FAO
 
Analysis of Multiplied Projects Presentation
Analysis of Multiplied Projects PresentationAnalysis of Multiplied Projects Presentation
Analysis of Multiplied Projects PresentationIwl Pcu
 
Romania Agricultural Pollution Control (2) presentation
Romania Agricultural Pollution Control (2) presentationRomania Agricultural Pollution Control (2) presentation
Romania Agricultural Pollution Control (2) presentationIwl Pcu
 
Managing Livestock Manure presentation
Managing Livestock Manure presentationManaging Livestock Manure presentation
Managing Livestock Manure presentationIwl Pcu
 
ITEM 6 - EC commitments on soil for EU
ITEM 6 - EC commitments on soil for EUITEM 6 - EC commitments on soil for EU
ITEM 6 - EC commitments on soil for EUSoils FAO-GSP
 

Similar to EU Agricultural and Environmental Requirements in Sweden presentation (20)

World Bank Experiences with Agricultural Non Point Source Pollution Control P...
World Bank Experiences with Agricultural Non Point Source Pollution Control P...World Bank Experiences with Agricultural Non Point Source Pollution Control P...
World Bank Experiences with Agricultural Non Point Source Pollution Control P...
 
GEF Black Sea/Danube Partnership presentation
GEF Black Sea/Danube Partnership presentationGEF Black Sea/Danube Partnership presentation
GEF Black Sea/Danube Partnership presentation
 
IFA Nitrates Regulation Consultation & Discussion
IFA Nitrates Regulation Consultation & Discussion IFA Nitrates Regulation Consultation & Discussion
IFA Nitrates Regulation Consultation & Discussion
 
1.3 The Danish Policy Mix to Address the Environmental Impacts of Fertilisers...
1.3 The Danish Policy Mix to Address the Environmental Impacts of Fertilisers...1.3 The Danish Policy Mix to Address the Environmental Impacts of Fertilisers...
1.3 The Danish Policy Mix to Address the Environmental Impacts of Fertilisers...
 
Presentation - Workshop 2: The implementation of the Polluter Pays Principle,...
Presentation - Workshop 2: The implementation of the Polluter Pays Principle,...Presentation - Workshop 2: The implementation of the Polluter Pays Principle,...
Presentation - Workshop 2: The implementation of the Polluter Pays Principle,...
 
GEF Romania Agricultural Pollution Control Project
GEF Romania Agricultural Pollution Control ProjectGEF Romania Agricultural Pollution Control Project
GEF Romania Agricultural Pollution Control Project
 
Accounting for Carbon in Australia’s Coastal Wetlands
Accounting for Carbon in Australia’s Coastal WetlandsAccounting for Carbon in Australia’s Coastal Wetlands
Accounting for Carbon in Australia’s Coastal Wetlands
 
Environment conference presentation.pptx
Environment conference presentation.pptxEnvironment conference presentation.pptx
Environment conference presentation.pptx
 
Environment conference presentation by Julie Girling, MEP
Environment conference presentation by Julie Girling, MEPEnvironment conference presentation by Julie Girling, MEP
Environment conference presentation by Julie Girling, MEP
 
The Danish Way to Reduce Greenhouse Gas Emissions From Agriculture
The Danish Way to Reduce Greenhouse Gas Emissions From AgricultureThe Danish Way to Reduce Greenhouse Gas Emissions From Agriculture
The Danish Way to Reduce Greenhouse Gas Emissions From Agriculture
 
HELCOM - on the way to nutrient load reduction
HELCOM - on the way to nutrient load reduction HELCOM - on the way to nutrient load reduction
HELCOM - on the way to nutrient load reduction
 
Romania Agricultural Pollution Control Project Presentation
Romania Agricultural Pollution Control Project PresentationRomania Agricultural Pollution Control Project Presentation
Romania Agricultural Pollution Control Project Presentation
 
Turkey Anatolia Watershed Rehabilitation Project Presentation
Turkey Anatolia Watershed Rehabilitation Project PresentationTurkey Anatolia Watershed Rehabilitation Project Presentation
Turkey Anatolia Watershed Rehabilitation Project Presentation
 
The optimal management practice to reduce agroecosystem ghg, kristiina regina...
The optimal management practice to reduce agroecosystem ghg, kristiina regina...The optimal management practice to reduce agroecosystem ghg, kristiina regina...
The optimal management practice to reduce agroecosystem ghg, kristiina regina...
 
A Service for Improving the Assignments of Common Agriculture Policy Funds to...
A Service for Improving the Assignments of Common Agriculture Policy Funds to...A Service for Improving the Assignments of Common Agriculture Policy Funds to...
A Service for Improving the Assignments of Common Agriculture Policy Funds to...
 
Current Status of Soil Researches in Turkey - Bülent Sönmez
Current Status of Soil Researches in Turkey - Bülent Sönmez Current Status of Soil Researches in Turkey - Bülent Sönmez
Current Status of Soil Researches in Turkey - Bülent Sönmez
 
Analysis of Multiplied Projects Presentation
Analysis of Multiplied Projects PresentationAnalysis of Multiplied Projects Presentation
Analysis of Multiplied Projects Presentation
 
Romania Agricultural Pollution Control (2) presentation
Romania Agricultural Pollution Control (2) presentationRomania Agricultural Pollution Control (2) presentation
Romania Agricultural Pollution Control (2) presentation
 
Managing Livestock Manure presentation
Managing Livestock Manure presentationManaging Livestock Manure presentation
Managing Livestock Manure presentation
 
ITEM 6 - EC commitments on soil for EU
ITEM 6 - EC commitments on soil for EUITEM 6 - EC commitments on soil for EU
ITEM 6 - EC commitments on soil for EU
 

More from Iwl Pcu

Flood and Drought Management Tools (IWC8)
Flood and Drought Management Tools (IWC8)Flood and Drought Management Tools (IWC8)
Flood and Drought Management Tools (IWC8)Iwl Pcu
 
Caribbean Wastewater - Innovative Solutions (IWC8)
Caribbean Wastewater - Innovative Solutions (IWC8)Caribbean Wastewater - Innovative Solutions (IWC8)
Caribbean Wastewater - Innovative Solutions (IWC8)Iwl Pcu
 
Large Marine Ecosystems: Megaregional Best Practices for LME Assessment and M...
Large Marine Ecosystems: Megaregional Best Practices for LME Assessment and M...Large Marine Ecosystems: Megaregional Best Practices for LME Assessment and M...
Large Marine Ecosystems: Megaregional Best Practices for LME Assessment and M...Iwl Pcu
 
Understanding the audience (IWC8)
Understanding the audience (IWC8)Understanding the audience (IWC8)
Understanding the audience (IWC8)Iwl Pcu
 
Effective slide designing
Effective slide designingEffective slide designing
Effective slide designingIwl Pcu
 
How to communicate science effectively (IWC8 Presentation)
How to communicate science effectively (IWC8 Presentation)How to communicate science effectively (IWC8 Presentation)
How to communicate science effectively (IWC8 Presentation)Iwl Pcu
 
Presentation vs Publication
Presentation vs PublicationPresentation vs Publication
Presentation vs PublicationIwl Pcu
 
Introduction to Nutrient Roundtable (IWC8)
Introduction to Nutrient Roundtable (IWC8)Introduction to Nutrient Roundtable (IWC8)
Introduction to Nutrient Roundtable (IWC8)Iwl Pcu
 
GEF Oceanic Fisheries Management Project – Towards Transformation Change (IWC...
GEF Oceanic Fisheries Management Project – Towards Transformation Change (IWC...GEF Oceanic Fisheries Management Project – Towards Transformation Change (IWC...
GEF Oceanic Fisheries Management Project – Towards Transformation Change (IWC...Iwl Pcu
 
TDA/SAP Methodology Training Course Module 2 Section 1
TDA/SAP Methodology Training Course Module 2 Section 1TDA/SAP Methodology Training Course Module 2 Section 1
TDA/SAP Methodology Training Course Module 2 Section 1Iwl Pcu
 
TDA/SAP Methodology Training Course Module 2 Section 10
TDA/SAP Methodology Training Course Module 2 Section 10TDA/SAP Methodology Training Course Module 2 Section 10
TDA/SAP Methodology Training Course Module 2 Section 10Iwl Pcu
 
TDA/SAP Methodology Training Course Module 2 Section 10
TDA/SAP Methodology Training Course Module 2 Section 10TDA/SAP Methodology Training Course Module 2 Section 10
TDA/SAP Methodology Training Course Module 2 Section 10Iwl Pcu
 
TDA/SAP Methodology Training Course Module 2 Section 9
TDA/SAP Methodology Training Course Module 2 Section 9TDA/SAP Methodology Training Course Module 2 Section 9
TDA/SAP Methodology Training Course Module 2 Section 9Iwl Pcu
 
TDA/SAP Methodology Training Course Module 2 Section 5
TDA/SAP Methodology Training Course Module 2 Section 5TDA/SAP Methodology Training Course Module 2 Section 5
TDA/SAP Methodology Training Course Module 2 Section 5Iwl Pcu
 
TDA/SAP Methodology Training Course Module 2 Section 5
TDA/SAP Methodology Training Course Module 2 Section 5TDA/SAP Methodology Training Course Module 2 Section 5
TDA/SAP Methodology Training Course Module 2 Section 5Iwl Pcu
 
TDA/SAP Methodology Training Course Module 2 Section 5
TDA/SAP Methodology Training Course Module 2 Section 5TDA/SAP Methodology Training Course Module 2 Section 5
TDA/SAP Methodology Training Course Module 2 Section 5Iwl Pcu
 
TDA/SAP Methodology Training Course Module 2 Section 7
TDA/SAP Methodology Training Course Module 2 Section 7TDA/SAP Methodology Training Course Module 2 Section 7
TDA/SAP Methodology Training Course Module 2 Section 7Iwl Pcu
 
TDA/SAP Methodology Training Course Module 2 Section 5
TDA/SAP Methodology Training Course Module 2 Section 5TDA/SAP Methodology Training Course Module 2 Section 5
TDA/SAP Methodology Training Course Module 2 Section 5Iwl Pcu
 
TDA/SAP Methodology Training Course Module 2 Section 6
TDA/SAP Methodology Training Course Module 2 Section 6TDA/SAP Methodology Training Course Module 2 Section 6
TDA/SAP Methodology Training Course Module 2 Section 6Iwl Pcu
 
TDA/SAP Methodology Training Course Module 2 Section 5
TDA/SAP Methodology Training Course Module 2 Section 5TDA/SAP Methodology Training Course Module 2 Section 5
TDA/SAP Methodology Training Course Module 2 Section 5Iwl Pcu
 

More from Iwl Pcu (20)

Flood and Drought Management Tools (IWC8)
Flood and Drought Management Tools (IWC8)Flood and Drought Management Tools (IWC8)
Flood and Drought Management Tools (IWC8)
 
Caribbean Wastewater - Innovative Solutions (IWC8)
Caribbean Wastewater - Innovative Solutions (IWC8)Caribbean Wastewater - Innovative Solutions (IWC8)
Caribbean Wastewater - Innovative Solutions (IWC8)
 
Large Marine Ecosystems: Megaregional Best Practices for LME Assessment and M...
Large Marine Ecosystems: Megaregional Best Practices for LME Assessment and M...Large Marine Ecosystems: Megaregional Best Practices for LME Assessment and M...
Large Marine Ecosystems: Megaregional Best Practices for LME Assessment and M...
 
Understanding the audience (IWC8)
Understanding the audience (IWC8)Understanding the audience (IWC8)
Understanding the audience (IWC8)
 
Effective slide designing
Effective slide designingEffective slide designing
Effective slide designing
 
How to communicate science effectively (IWC8 Presentation)
How to communicate science effectively (IWC8 Presentation)How to communicate science effectively (IWC8 Presentation)
How to communicate science effectively (IWC8 Presentation)
 
Presentation vs Publication
Presentation vs PublicationPresentation vs Publication
Presentation vs Publication
 
Introduction to Nutrient Roundtable (IWC8)
Introduction to Nutrient Roundtable (IWC8)Introduction to Nutrient Roundtable (IWC8)
Introduction to Nutrient Roundtable (IWC8)
 
GEF Oceanic Fisheries Management Project – Towards Transformation Change (IWC...
GEF Oceanic Fisheries Management Project – Towards Transformation Change (IWC...GEF Oceanic Fisheries Management Project – Towards Transformation Change (IWC...
GEF Oceanic Fisheries Management Project – Towards Transformation Change (IWC...
 
TDA/SAP Methodology Training Course Module 2 Section 1
TDA/SAP Methodology Training Course Module 2 Section 1TDA/SAP Methodology Training Course Module 2 Section 1
TDA/SAP Methodology Training Course Module 2 Section 1
 
TDA/SAP Methodology Training Course Module 2 Section 10
TDA/SAP Methodology Training Course Module 2 Section 10TDA/SAP Methodology Training Course Module 2 Section 10
TDA/SAP Methodology Training Course Module 2 Section 10
 
TDA/SAP Methodology Training Course Module 2 Section 10
TDA/SAP Methodology Training Course Module 2 Section 10TDA/SAP Methodology Training Course Module 2 Section 10
TDA/SAP Methodology Training Course Module 2 Section 10
 
TDA/SAP Methodology Training Course Module 2 Section 9
TDA/SAP Methodology Training Course Module 2 Section 9TDA/SAP Methodology Training Course Module 2 Section 9
TDA/SAP Methodology Training Course Module 2 Section 9
 
TDA/SAP Methodology Training Course Module 2 Section 5
TDA/SAP Methodology Training Course Module 2 Section 5TDA/SAP Methodology Training Course Module 2 Section 5
TDA/SAP Methodology Training Course Module 2 Section 5
 
TDA/SAP Methodology Training Course Module 2 Section 5
TDA/SAP Methodology Training Course Module 2 Section 5TDA/SAP Methodology Training Course Module 2 Section 5
TDA/SAP Methodology Training Course Module 2 Section 5
 
TDA/SAP Methodology Training Course Module 2 Section 5
TDA/SAP Methodology Training Course Module 2 Section 5TDA/SAP Methodology Training Course Module 2 Section 5
TDA/SAP Methodology Training Course Module 2 Section 5
 
TDA/SAP Methodology Training Course Module 2 Section 7
TDA/SAP Methodology Training Course Module 2 Section 7TDA/SAP Methodology Training Course Module 2 Section 7
TDA/SAP Methodology Training Course Module 2 Section 7
 
TDA/SAP Methodology Training Course Module 2 Section 5
TDA/SAP Methodology Training Course Module 2 Section 5TDA/SAP Methodology Training Course Module 2 Section 5
TDA/SAP Methodology Training Course Module 2 Section 5
 
TDA/SAP Methodology Training Course Module 2 Section 6
TDA/SAP Methodology Training Course Module 2 Section 6TDA/SAP Methodology Training Course Module 2 Section 6
TDA/SAP Methodology Training Course Module 2 Section 6
 
TDA/SAP Methodology Training Course Module 2 Section 5
TDA/SAP Methodology Training Course Module 2 Section 5TDA/SAP Methodology Training Course Module 2 Section 5
TDA/SAP Methodology Training Course Module 2 Section 5
 

EU Agricultural and Environmental Requirements in Sweden presentation

  • 1. Compliance with EU Agricultural and Environmental Requirements - The Swedish Experience Christine Jakobsson, JTI Regional Conference on Agricultural Source Pollution in Danube, Baltic and Black Sea Riparian Countries, Bucharest September 30 - October 3, 2003 C. Jakobsson 5/2003 1
  • 2. Disposition • EU:s Nitrate Directive • Sweden’s legislation and adaptation to EU • Swedish advisory service & information • Synthesis from the implementation of EU:s Nitrate Directive C. Jakobsson 5/2003 2
  • 3. The policy implementation of nutrient management in European Countries EU:s Nitrate Directive Different approaches in policy • Nitrogen or phosphorus based systems – N based systems as in the Nitrate Directive, (170 kg N/ha) are C. Jakobsson 5/2003 3 most common – P based systems e.g. Sweden, the allowed level of P is defined as livestock density corresponding to 22 kg P in manure/ha, - no problems with requirements of 170 kg N/ha returned in animal excreta (Nitrate Directive). Another advantage is that information on P content in manure is more reliable, as losses in animal houses and during storage are almost non-existent and therefore easier for the farmer to calculate. – N and P-based systems
  • 4. The policy implementation of nutrient management in European Countries EU:s Nitrate Directive Implementation of nutrient management legislation • The Nitrate Directive issued in 1991. Most activities to be implemented before 2000. • Objectives are to reduce water pollution caused or induced by nitrates from agricultural sources and to prevent such pollution. • Member states must identify Nitrate Vulnerable Zones (NZVs) on the basis of monitoring requirements results. • Action Programmes with mandatory measures on agricultural practices must be implemented in NVZs. Maximum amounts of animal manure that can be applied to land yearly (210 kg N/ha until mid-December 2002 when the amount will be reduced to 170 kg N/ha). • Monitoring of water quality according to specific requirements. • Codes of Good Agricultural Practice (CGAP) must be elaborated and are mandatory in the NVZs and voluntary outside. C. Jakobsson 5/2003 4
  • 5. C. Jakobsson 5/2003 5 Nitrate Vulnerable Zones in Europe Source: J. Duchemin
  • 6. EU:s Nitrate directive • Promote the use of suitable methods within agriculture to create a general protective level against all pollution of all water • Special protection is necessary for certain areas against nitrogen compounds • Members states must identify vulnerable zones and establish and implement action programmes for these areas (within 2 years) • Action programmes should contain measures to reduce the land-application of all N-fertilisers and in particular to set specific limits for the application of livestock manure • It is necessary to monitor waters C. Jakobsson 5/2003 6
  • 7. EU:s Nitrate directive Establish a Code of Good Agricultural Practice The objective of reducing nitrate pollution should cover: • periods when the land application of fertiliser is inappropriate; • the land application of fertilisers to steeply sloping ground; • the land application of fertiliser to water-saturated, flooded, frozen C. Jakobsson 5/2003 7 or snow-covered ground; • the conditions for land application of fertiliser near water courses; • the capacity and construction of storage vessels for livestock manure, including measures to prevent water pollution by run-off and seepage into the groundwater and surface water of liquids containing livestock manure and effluents from stored plant materials such as silage; • procedures for the land application, including rate and uniformity of spreading, of both chemical fertiliser and livestock manure, that will maintain nutrient losses to water at an acceptable level
  • 8. EU:s Nitrate directive Establish a Code of Good Agricultural Practice The objective of reducing nitrate pollution may cover: • land use management, including the use of crop rotation systems and the proportion of the land area devoted to permanent crops relative to annual tillage crops; • the maintenance of a minimum quantity of vegetation cover during (rainy) periods that will take up the nitrogen from the soil that could otherwise cause NO3-pollution of water; • the establishment of fertiliser plans on a farm-by-farm basis and the keeping of records on fertiliser use; • the prevention of water pollution from run-off and the downward water movement beyond the reach of crop roots in irrigation systems. C. Jakobsson 5/2003 8
  • 9. EU:s Nitrate directive Measures to be include in action programmes - rules: • periods when the land application of certain types of fertiliser is prohibited; • the capacity of storage vessels for livestock C. Jakobsson 5/2003 9 manure;
  • 10. EU:s Nitrate directive Measures to be include in action programmes - rules cont.: • limitation of the land application of fertilisers, consistent with good agricultural practice and taking into account the characteristics of the vulnerable zone concerned, in particular: – soil conditions, soil type and slope; – climatic conditions, rainfall and irrigation; – land use and agricultural practices, including crop rotation systems; and to be based on a balance between: • the foreseeable N requirements of the crops, and • the nitrogen supply to the crops from the soil and from fertilisation corresponding to: – the amount of N present in the soil at the end of winter – through net mineralisation of the organic N reserves in the soil – from livestock manure – from chemical and other fertilisers C. Jakobsson 5/2003 10
  • 11. EU:s Nitrate directive Measures to be include in action programmes - rules continuation: • These measures will ensure that, for each farm or livestock unit the amount of livestock manure applied to the land each year, including by the animals themselves, shall not exceed 170 kg N per hectare (210 kg N per ha the first 4 years) • These amounts may be calculated on the basis of animal C. Jakobsson 5/2003 11 numbers
  • 12. EU:s Nitrate directive Criteria for identifying waters - Monitoring programmes and measures • if the groundwater contains more than 50 mg/l C. Jakobsson 5/2003 12 nitrates • if surface freshwaters, in particular those used for drinking water, contain more than 50 mg/l nitrates • if natural freshwater lakes, other freshwater bodies, estuaries, coastal waters and marine waters are found to be eutrophic or may become so
  • 13. • Sweden is a very sparsely populated and forest dominated C. Jakobsson 5/2003 13 country. • The environmental problems are small in comparison to many other countries in Europe. • Nutrient leakage from agriculture, especially nitrogen, affects coastal areas and also rivers and lakes negatively. • Surface run-off of phosphorus can be a problem causing eutrophication, mainly in inland waters, where phosphorus is generally the growth limiting factor.
  • 14. Programme to reduce nutrient losses from agriculture • Launched in 1988 by the Swedish Parliament • The goal was to reduce the amount of N that reaches the Baltic Sea by 50% from 1985 to 1995 and to substantially reduce the amount of P. • This goal has not been reached, but 25% reductions in N losses to the Baltic Sea have been calculated. In Svealand the reduction of nitrogen losses to the sea was up to 40% (SEPA, 1997). • Since 1995 specific measures to reduce the ammonia losses from agriculture were successively elaborated and implemented. • Measures to tackle the problems are: – requirements and guidelines – advisory service and information – research and development – economic instruments of control C. Jakobsson 5/2003 14
  • 15. • To ensure that manure is not produced in excess to the amount of arable land on the farm, a balance must exist between the amount of animals on the farm and the amount of land available for spreading manure. • The maximum amount of animals has been precised with consideration taken to the amount of P and N in manure and a crops normal requirements and removal of plant nutrients. • The limiting factor is P, with a maximum amount of approximately 23-25 kg P per hectare. • As the amount of manure per area will be moderate, the risk of nutrient leaching of both N and P will be smaller. • One advantage with using P instead of N is that the figures on P content in manure are more reliable, as P losses in the stable and during storage are almost non-existing. C. Jakobsson 5/2003 15
  • 16. The number of animals per hectare may not be larger than: Type of animal Animals/ha Dairy cows 1,6 Cows for breeding calves 2,3 Heifers, bulls, steers > 1 years age 4,6 Calves < 1 years age 5,8 Sheep and goats 15 Sows in production 2,2 Fattening pigs, places 10,5 Laying hens, places 100 Young hens, places 250 Broilers, places 470 Turkeys, ducks, geese, places 140 Horses 3 Mink, breeding females 50 Spreading area for manure •Own arable land and leased arable land •Spreading contracts (min. 5 years) with neighbors & spreading journal C. Jakobsson 5/2003 16 •Exception - if manure is fabricated to a product that leaves the farm
  • 17. Manure, slurry and urine storage requirements in sensitive regions C. Jakobsson 5/2003 17 and for large farms • 8 months for animal production consisting of cattle, horses, sheep or goats • 10 months for other types of animal production. Applies to all farms with > 10 animal units in a specified pollution sensitive area consisting of southern Sweden and a 20 km coastal zone from the Norwegian border to Stockholm county. They also apply to all farms in Sweden with > 100 animal units. In the rest of Sweden The size of the storage facilities for manure should with good margins be able to handle the need for storage during the time-period when livestock manure should not be spread - 6 to 10 months production of manure.
  • 18. Ammonia reduction measures for storage of slurry and urine • slurry and urine pits must be covered with a stable surface crust layer or other covering that effectively reduces ammonia emissions • filling must take place beneath the covering. Since 1995, this affects farms with > 10 animal units in three counties in southern Sweden, and since 1997 in the rest of Götaland and on the plains of Svealand. Slurry pits can either be covered with a natural crust, straw, peat, plastic, leca pebbles, a roof or other covering materials that effectively reduce ammonia emissions. Filling beneath the covering is to prevent the slurry or urine from breaking the cover or ending up on top of the cover. C. Jakobsson 5/2003 18
  • 19. Ban on application of manure and other organic manure during winter • To prevent nutrient leaching, manure and other organic wastes may not be applied to land in Sweden during the 1st of December to the 28th of February, unless they are incorporated in the soil the same day to a depth of at least 10 cm. • Harrowing the surface is not enough. C. Jakobsson 5/2003 19
  • 20. Sweden’s adaptation of legislation to the Nitrate Directive New requirements on manure application in sensitive regions since January 1999 1. Fertilisers must not be spread in amounts exceeding the crops nitrogen requirements for the growing season. The amount of fertiliser applicated should be based on a balance between the crops foreseeable nitrogen requirements and the nitrogen supply from all external potential nutrient sources, as well as taking into account: a) soil conditions, soil type and slope, b) climatic conditions, precipitation and irrigation, c) land use and agricultural practices, including crop rotation systems; 2. Fertiliser must not be applicated on water-saturated or flooded C. Jakobsson 5/2003 20 ground;
  • 21. Sweden’s adaptation of legislation to the Nitrate Directive New requirements on manure application in sensitive regions since January 1999 3. Fertiliser must not be applicated on snow-covered or deeply C. Jakobsson 5/2003 21 frozen ground; 4. Nitrogen containing commercial fertilisers must not be applicated from the 1st of November to the 15th of February; 5. Manure and other organic fertilisers must not be applicated from the 1st of January to the 15th of February; 6. Manure and other organic fertilisers can be spread from the 1st of August to the 30th of November only to a growing crop or before autumn sowing.
  • 22. New requirements on manure application in sensitive regions since January 1999 Land application of FYM with the exception of poultry manure, is allowed on bare soils, without the requirements of autumn sowing afterwards, from 20 October to 30 November in the counties of Blekinge, Skåne och Halland if incorporation takes place, as well as from 10 October to 30 November in the defined coastal areas of Stockholms, Södermanlands, Östergötlands, Kalmar, Västra Götalands and Gotlands county, if incorporation takes place the same day. Farmyard manure (FYM) is defined as manure and other organic fertilisers that can be stacked to at least 1 meters height without a supportive wall and that has a dry matter content higher than 20%. C. Jakobsson 5/2003 22
  • 23. Ammonia reduction measures for application of manure Incorporation within 4 hours Since 1996, manure, slurry or urine must be incorporated within 4 hours after land application when spreading on bare soils. This applies to three counties in southern Sweden. When applying manure, slurry and urine it is of great importance that incorporation takes place as soon as possible, as the largest ammonia emissions take place immediately after application. The ammonia emissions are high, when the contents of ammonia nitrogen are high in the urine, slurry or manure. It is not until the ammonia ion is adsorbed by soil particles or assimilated by crops, that the risk of ammonia emissions is practically inhibited. C. Jakobsson 5/2003 23
  • 24. Techniques for application to growing crops In the three counties in southern Sweden, from 1998, slurry must be spread to growing crops with techniques that efficiently reduce losses of ammonia:  Bandspreading techniques or other similar techniques, where slurry is placed directly on the ground beneath the crop cover,  Injectors or other similar techniques, where slurry is placed directly C. Jakobsson 5/2003 24 in the ground,  Techniques, where one part slurry is diluted with at least one half part water before application (broadcasting),  Techniques, that are followed by irrigation with at least 10 mm water within 4 hours (broadcasting).
  • 25. At least 60 respectively 50% winter-green land is required during the autumn or winter on every farm with more than 5 hectares arable land in the three most southern counties and in the rest of Götaland respectively. Only open fields, not natural pastures or grazing land, are affected by the requirements. Both the time for sowing and for interrupting plant growth are regulated. The following crops are accepted: grassland, winter cereals, winter oilseeds, energy forest (usually Salix), sugar beets, carrots or other similar root crops (not potatoes), perennial fruit and berry crops, special catch crops (usually perennial ryegrass, Lolium perenne), set-aside arable land with covering plants. C. Jakobsson 5/2003 25
  • 26. • Farms with more than 200 animal units are required to apply for a permit at the County Administrative Board to be able to operate. • The permit usually consists of requirements regarding the maximum amount of animals, the storage capacity and application of manure etc. C. Jakobsson 5/2003 26
  • 27. Plant nutrients - Current legislation affecting the agricultural sector in Sweden Summary • Livestock density: according to P contents of manure (23-25 kg P/ha) • Manure storage: storage capacity, covering of urine and slurry pits, C. Jakobsson 5/2003 27 filling beneath the cover • Application of manure: ban, new requirements, incorporation, spreading techniques when spreading in a growing crops • Application of fertilisers: nitrogen application according to the crops requirements, ban on winter spreading • Winter-green land: 60 resp. 50% • Permits for farms with more than 200 livestock units
  • 28. Advisory service and information • Advice free of charge for all farms with more than 20 livestock units since 1988 – Plant nutrient balance (farm-gate balance)- STANK computer programme – Plant production plan with special reference to strategies for usage of manure • Plant nutrient newsletters • Demonstrations e.g. manure spreaders and field trials • Since 2001 “Focus on Nutrients” C. Jakobsson 5/2003 28
  • 29. Focus on Nutrients • Joint venture between The Swedish Board of Agriculture, The County Administration Boards, The Federation of Swedish Farmers and a number of companies in the farming business. • The largest single undertaking in Sweden to reduce losses of nutrients to air and water from livestock and crop production. Mainly in the Southern part of Sweden • A campaign to provide training and advice and the project´s aim is to encompass the entire flow of nutrients on the farm. Extended extension service and documentation at the farm level, indicators • Voluntary programme for farmers with environmental payments (EU-CAP). 3 800 farmers have joined. • The background is the new Swedish national goals for environmental C. Jakobsson 5/2003 29 quality
  • 30. Environmental Quality Goal Area covered by Focus on Nutrients - Zero Eutrophication - Phosphorus losses, nitrogen leaching,ammonia volatilisation - Natural Acidification Only - Ammonia volatilisation - Good-Quality Groundwater - Nitrogen leaching - Reduced Climate Impact - Nitrous oxide emissions (nitrogen leaching) - A Non Toxic Environment - Handling of plant protection chemicals C. Jakobsson 5/2003 30
  • 31. Focus on Nutrients The purpose is to: * reduce losses of nitrate from farmland * reduce ammonia emissions from manure * reduce losses of phosphorus from farmland * avoid spreading of pesticides into surface and groundwater This shall be reached by increasing nutrient management efficiency on the farms by increasing awareness and knowledge. The farmer is in focus and therefore the core of the project is education and advising by individual visits by farm advisers. www.greppa.nu C. Jakobsson 5/2003 31
  • 32. “Focus on Nutrients” “Greppa näringen” Advice - Sequence of advisory modules • Start-planning advisory needs • Basic nutrient balance • Repeat nutrient balance • Nitrogen strategy • Phosphorus strategy • Soil compaction • Handling of plant protection chemicals • Planning wetlands • Grass crop strategy • Animal housing environment • Planning of buildings • Inspection of feeding plan for dairy cows • Inspection of feeding plan for beef cattle • Grazing strategy • Feed consumption recording for piglets • Feed consumption recording for fattening pigs C. Jakobsson 5/2003 32
  • 33. Options and perspectives of the nutrient policy in Sweden - Conclusions • Sweden is generally satisfied with the legislation in this area • No large problems exist • No major changes in the legislation are planned for the future • Minor adjustments will most likely take place e.g. – Enlargement of NVZ area – Definitions of animal units – Livestock density • Sweden is more interested in voluntary agreements with farmers • No changes in the ammonia legislation were introduced after the review and analysis (1998) - instead wait for the results from the legislation that recently came into place (1995 - ) C. Jakobsson 5/2003 33
  • 34. Options and perspectives of the nutrient policy in Sweden Conclusions C. Jakobsson 5/2003 34 Measures and control • No difficulties – Livestock density, – storage of manure/urine/slurry, – green land, spreading technology • Some difficulties – incorporation of manure/urine/slurry within a time frame (4 hours) - documentation of spreading on the farm
  • 35. Advice from Ingrid Svedinger, Ministry of Agriculture, Sweden • Take regular contact and have discussions with DG Environment, Michael Hamell, chairman(Irland), Liliana Cortelini and Claudia Olasabel • Be active within the Nitrate Committee • Difference between guidelines (stricter - should be done, if not otherwise proven) and guidance (only recommendations) C. Jakobsson 5/2003 35
  • 36. Main obligations of the Nitrate Directive and their implementation by Member States as of 01/06/2001 Member state AT BE DK DE EL ES FI FR IR IT LX NL NL PT SE UK Water monitoring + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + Designation of NVZ + + + + + + + +  + + + + + + + Codes of Good + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + Agricultural Practice Action programmes + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + Report to the Commission on + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + implementation status Notes: + indicates that the task is performed but not necessarily approved by the Commission;  indicates that important designations are expected by the end of 2001; shaded cells indicate that infringement procedures are ongoing (some proceedings at an early stage are not mentioned in this table for legal reasons) Source: Jean Duchemin, personal communication C. Jakobsson 5/2003 36
  • 38. D. CONCLUSION • At least 30-40% of rivers and lakes show eutrophication symptoms or bring high nitrogen fluxes to coastal waters and seas. The agricultural origin is 50 - 80% of total N inputs to EU waters, depending on Member States, watersheds and annual variations; • All M. S. have now transposed the directive, set up a comprehensive monitoring network, established a code of good practice, and designated at least partially their vulnerable zones (except Ireland); • A CAP more oriented towards quality rather than quantity, encouraging extensive cropping or breeding, “buffer” natural areas and accurate balanced fertilisation, can further contribute to these purposes; • Cost-efficiency studies on preventive measures should also be encouraged, in order to focus action programmes and practice changes towards the most efficient one; C. Jakobsson 5/2003 38
  • 39. D. CONCLUSION cont. • Besides financial support for a more environmental-friendly agriculture and dissemination of knowledge, it is necessary that all M.S. arrive at a full implementation of the Nitrate Directive, reinforce surveys and controls at field level (including checking of fertilisation plans and records, manure storage and handling, soil analysis, natural buffer strips, etc.), and introduce dissuasive penalties for the producers who do not ensure eco-compliance. • Investments in urban wastewater treatment will be inefficient regarding nutrients if a parallel effort is not devoted to an effective reduction of agricultural nutrients losses. • Water Framework Directive (WFD). A synergy has to be developed in the future work for common implementation of these water directives, on items such as: — Harmonisation of water sampling points, networks, parameters and frequencies for water quality monitoring in order to meet, with minimum work at field level, the needs linked with EU Directives, OECD-Eurostat Questionnaires, EEA “Eurowaternet”, Marine and River Conventions, and local/regional needs. C. Jakobsson 5/2003 39
  • 40. D. CONCLUSION cont. — Harmonisation of water sampling points, networks, parameters and frequencies for water quality monitoring in order to meet, with minimum work at field level, the needs linked with EU Directives, OECD-Eurostat Questionnaires, EEA Eurowaternet”, Marine and River Conventions, and local/regional needs. — Assessment of point and diffuse losses of nutrients to waters, and of the breakdown of their origin (agriculture, urban waters, industry, air deposition…: — Models correlating environmental impacts (e.g. algae blooms) and causative factors (nutrients, natural conditions, etc.), which will allow forecast of impact of various scenarios in the reduction or increase of these factors. — Cost-efficiency approach for preventive measures. Nitrogen and Phosphorus will certainly appear as priority polluters in many E.U. watersheds. C. Jakobsson 5/2003 40