2. • Research and planning (20)
• Construction of main tasks (40)
• Ancillary 1 (10)
• Ancillary 2 (10)
• Evaluation (20)
OLIVIA DIXON – HORROR TRAILER
3. Overall, the research and planning shown by Olivia is
produced to an excellent quality, this was shown by the
good quantity of work which is in great depth. Things
which could be improved is the way in which the research
was presented on her Blog, for example all of her location
shots should have been presented before the completed
ancillary tasks; this is because locations were needed before
the tasks would have been finished. The mark we are giving
Olivia for her research and planning is 17 out of 20.
RESEARCH AND PLANNING
4. Overall the finished product is a professional looking trailer
however we believe there are a few improvement which could be
made to make the main task more effective for example:
• Some shots are set in daylight so it doesn’t follow conventions.
• At the end of the trailer the shot jumps slightly to the left when
zooming.
• Some shots are blurry
• Different misé-en-scene at the start and the middle (in her
bedroom, there is different bed sheets)
Mark – 32 out of 40.
CONSTRUCTION OF MAIN TASK
5. The title is similar to the original magazine
The BEST … EVER doesn’t stand out as
much yet it should contain more emphasis
in comparison to HORROR PREVIEW.
Red is also more of a scary colour which
would fit the HORROR PREVIEW part
The subtitle is not that much different to the hooks, so
it’s difficult to tell if there is even a subtitle
• Has a professional look to it
• Title has horror conventions – edgy and
creepy
• Scary picture to fit the conventions of a
horror magazine
Mark – 8 out of 10
ANCILLARY 1: MAGAZINE COVER
6. Very similar to the magazine cover –
the poster comes out before the
magazine so when the magazine was
viewed it wouldn’t be much of a
surprise to the audience
The title is effective, fits the
conventions of a horror poster
The effect on the leaves don’t fit
in with the rest of the picture
Dark colours, which also fit the
conventions
Mark – 7 out of 10
ANCILLARY 2: POSTER
7. • She used a lot of different techniques to present her work
i.e. prezi, slideshare, videos etc.
• There is a lot of in depth information
• Don’t use as much text as it gets tedious trying to read all
of it
Mark – 17 out of 20
EVALUATION
8. • Research and planning (20)
• Construction of main tasks (40)
• Ancillary 1 (10)
• Ancillary 2 (10)
• Evaluation (20)
RYAN ROBINSON – MUSIC VIDEO
9. • Did questionnaires for what an audience would like
• Analysed other lyrics, not just the song he chose to do for
the music video
• Analysed digipacks
• Planned out locations before shooting it
• Wasn’t enough analysis of other work
Mark – 15 out of 20
RESEARCH AND PLANNING
10. • Good acting, was all in sync
• Good ideas to make the work look effective
• Had a storyline within the video
• If there was no information with the music video
(research and planning) it would be confusing
Mark – 37 out of 40
CONSTRUCTION OF MAIN TASK
11. • Parental advisory tag – professional Mark – 6 out of 10
• Has a colour scheme
• Uses the same characters
• Variation of images
• Image on the front is too dark
• Images could be in better locations
• The text doesn’t stand out
• ‘lyrical criticism The kill’ should be capitalised and
separated with a hyphen
ANCILLARY 1: DIGI-PACK
12. • Clear image
• Advertisement for HMV and The Kill
• Image isolates Ryan Robinson (far right) from the rest of
the group (links with the music video)
• Not a recurring theme with Ancillary 1 task
• Different fonts used
Mark – 5 out of 10
ANCILLARY 2: POSTER
13. • Uses different media techniques to present his work
• Makes valid points
• Too much writing
• Not very organised
Mark – 14 out of 20
EVALUATION
14. • Research and planning (20)
• Construction of main tasks (40)
• Ancillary 1 (10)
• Ancillary 2 (10)
• Evaluation (20)
SHAUN LIDDLE - HORROR TRAILER
15. • Analysis of other students work
• Questionnaires
• Location planning
• Good photography
• Locations planning
• Roles and Responsibilities planning
• Horror trailer plot
Mark – 19 out of 20
RESEARCH AND PLANNING
16. • Used a range of actors
• Had a storyline
• Good location shots
• Bad acting – kept smiling and looking at the camera
• Confusing storyline
Mark – 29 out of 40
CONSTRUCTION OF MAIN TASK
17. • Good colour scheme, fits conventions
• Professional looking
• Easy to read fonts
• Typical conventions of a magazine
• The image looks too edited
• The writing could stand out more
Mark – 8 out of 10
ANCILLARY 1: MAGAZINE COVER
18. • Simple but effective
• Follows the same colour scheme as the magazine
• Different images style to the magazine
• The blood looks fake
• The image is too dull
• The writing on the bottom is difficult to ready being grey
Mark – 7 out of 10
ANCILLARY 2: POSTER
19. • Uses a range of techniques to present his work
• Includes a lot of information
• All organised
• Isn’t too much writing – straight to the point
Mark – 18 out of 20
EVALUATION
