Your SlideShare is downloading. ×
0
De groot talk_iscram drr
De groot talk_iscram drr
De groot talk_iscram drr
De groot talk_iscram drr
De groot talk_iscram drr
De groot talk_iscram drr
De groot talk_iscram drr
De groot talk_iscram drr
De groot talk_iscram drr
De groot talk_iscram drr
De groot talk_iscram drr
De groot talk_iscram drr
De groot talk_iscram drr
De groot talk_iscram drr
De groot talk_iscram drr
De groot talk_iscram drr
De groot talk_iscram drr
De groot talk_iscram drr
De groot talk_iscram drr
De groot talk_iscram drr
De groot talk_iscram drr
De groot talk_iscram drr
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×

Thanks for flagging this SlideShare!

Oops! An error has occurred.

×
Saving this for later? Get the SlideShare app to save on your phone or tablet. Read anywhere, anytime – even offline.
Text the download link to your phone
Standard text messaging rates apply

De groot talk_iscram drr

430

Published on

Talk by Gerard de Groot (Tilburg University) on Disaster Risk Reduction for ISCRAM summer school 2011

Talk by Gerard de Groot (Tilburg University) on Disaster Risk Reduction for ISCRAM summer school 2011

Published in: Education, Technology, Business
0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total Views
430
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
0
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
18
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

Report content
Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
No notes for slide

Transcript

  • 1. Disaster Risk Reduction<br />
  • 2. 17-8-2011 22:40<br />Cordaid Presentation<br />2<br />HISTORY OF DISASTER MANEGEMENT<br />Yokohoma strategy and plan for a safer world (May 1994)<br />“Disaster prevention, mitigation, preparedness and relief are four elements which contribute to and gain from the implementation of sustainable development policies. These elements, along with environmental protection and sustainable development, are closely interrelated.”<br /> “Disaster prevention, mitigation and preparedness are better than disaster response in achieving the goals and objectives of the Decade. Disaster response alone is not sufficient, as it yields only temporary results at a very high cost.” <br />
  • 3. 17-8-2011 22:40<br />Cordaid Presentation<br />3<br />KEY ASSUMPTION<br />core assumption disaster risk reduction (DRR)<br /> Disaster risk reduction is based upon the assumption that (natural) disasters will have a long-term negative impact on the development of underdeveloped countries.<br />HOWEVER there are critical notes<br />Aghion and Howitt (“Endogenous growth theory”, 1998) argue that disasters tend to have a positive long term spin-off effects on development due to technological improvements. The technological improvement can be explained from reconstruction activities.<br />
  • 4. 17-8-2011 22:40<br />Cordaid Presentation<br />4<br />A PILOT STUDY IN NORTHERN KENYA<br />objectives of the study<br /> The objective of the study is to quantify the impact of disaster risk reduction interventions in Kenya and determine the cost-effectiveness of long term DRR compared to short term emergency relief and rehabilitation. <br /> Moreover, the study will be a starting point of a future study on the qualitative long term impact of DRR intervention and to determine future direction.<br />Cost-benefit analysis requires information on long term impact of disasters!<br />
  • 5. The Black Swan<br />A black swan has three major characteristics:<br />It is anoutlier, thereforeverydifficult to predict<br />Itcarriesan extreme impact<br />It has retrospective (thoughnotprospective) predictability<br />Examples: the 9/11 attacks, the Dutch hunger winter, the stock market crash of 1929, NOT the present drought in the Horn of Africa<br />Yet we act as if the phenomenon does notexist!<br />(Source: NassimTaleb – The Black Swan. The impact of the highlyimprobable, 2007)<br />17-8-2011 22:40<br />Cordaid Presentation<br />5<br />
  • 6. Disaster in the Netherlands: Hunger winter<br />Short (sixmonthsbefore the end of Second World War) butsevere<br />Affectedlarge, healthy and stablepopulationgroup<br />Was documentedprecisely<br />Ended as abruptly as itstarted<br />Killed some 20,000 people (out of a population of 3.5 million)<br />17-8-2011 22:40<br />Cordaid Presentation<br />6<br />
  • 7. Sampling<br />Startingpopulation: 5,425 baby’s born in a hospital in Amsterdam<br />Bornfrom 1 November 1943 till 28 februari 1947<br />Excluded: earlybirths, twins<br />160 baby’s werenotregisteredwith the municipality<br />99 baby’s couldnotbetraced<br />Deceasedbefore start of study in 1994: 10%<br />164 peoplerefused to particpate<br />Twocontrolgroups of 650 baby’s<br />Final sample: 2,414<br />Howrepresentative is the sample? <br />17-8-2011 22:40<br />Cordaid Presentation<br />7<br />
  • 8. The negative impact of malnutrition, 50years later<br />Heartdiseases<br />Lungdiseases<br />Stress<br />Diabetes<br />Causalrelationbetween disaster and impact? <br />What are appropriateinterventions?<br />17-8-2011 22:40<br />Cordaid Presentation<br />8<br />
  • 9. 17-8-2011 22:40<br />Cordaid Presentation<br />9<br />CHANGING CONSENSUS ON DISASTER RISK APPROACH<br />1950s – 1960s: disaster = interruption of development process<br /> emergency relief as sole disaster response<br /> limited disaster preparedness<br />1970s – 1980s: development strategies included disaster risk mitigation<br /> disaster risk mitigation mainly technical<br />1990s – to date: disaster risk reduction mainstreamed in development strategies technical mitigation combined with strengthening of social structures increasing coping capacities and decreasing vulnerability<br />
  • 10. 17-8-2011 22:40<br />Cordaid Presentation<br />10<br />HOW TO DEFINE DISASTER RISK MANAGEMENT (DRM)<br />relation vulnerability and coping capacity<br /> there is no uniform definition of coping; definitions can be classified into two groups<br /> [1] coping can be considered as an ex post disaster activity indicating that coping capacities do not effect vulnerability<br /> [2] coping can be affiliated with both ex ante and ex post disaster action: coping aimed at decreasing vulnerability and coping related to containment of possible impacts of a hazard <br />
  • 11. 17-8-2011 22:40<br />Cordaid Presentation<br />11<br />“DISASTER PRESURE AND RELEASE”-MODEL<br />developed by Blaikie et al<br />explains disaster risks from a macro perspective where vulnerability is defined as:<br />“… characteristic of a person or group and their situation that influence their capacity to anticipate, cope with, resist and recover form the impact of a natural hazard.”<br />“At risk, second edition: natural hazards, people’s vulnerability, and disasters”, Wisner et al., 2003<br />
  • 12. 17-8-2011 22:40<br />Cordaid Presentation<br />12<br />
  • 13. 17-8-2011 22:40<br />Cordaid Presentation<br />13<br />HOW TO DEFINE DISASTER RISK<br />definition UNISDR<br /> The systematic development and application of policies, strategies and practices to minimise vulnerabilities and disaster risks and throughout a society, to avoid (prevention) or to limit (mitigation and preparedness) adverse impact of hazards, within he broad context of sustainable development.<br />source: “Living With Risk: A Global Review of Disaster Reduction Initiatives”, UNISDR<br />
  • 14. 17-8-2011 22:40<br />Cordaid Presentation<br />14<br />HOW TO DEFINE DISASTER RISK<br />relation disaster risks and hazards<br />D = disaster<br /> IH = total impact hazard<br /> IHx = total hazard on demography, economy, environment, social structures<br /> R = disaster risk<br />
  • 15. 17-8-2011 22:40<br />Cordaid Presentation<br />15<br />HOW TO DEFINE DISASTER RISK<br />coping as ex ante and ex post disaster activity<br />CEAC = ex ante disaster coping capacity aimed at limitation of impact<br /> CEAV = ex ante disaster coping capacity aimed at vulnerability reduction<br /> CEP = ex post disaster coping capacity of population at stake <br /> FGV = factors generating vulnerability<br /> FEV = factors enhancing vulnerability<br /> H = (magnitude of the) hazard<br /> IH = total impact hazard<br /> V = vulnerability of population at stake<br />
  • 16. Drought Cycle Management (DCM) Model<br />DCM stresses the need for continuity between activities aimed at development, relief and rehabilitation and distinguishes between four stages:<br />Normal: sufficient rain, focus on mitigation activities<br />Alert and alarm: First signs of drought, focus on preparation<br />Relief: food and water shortages result in hunger and death, focus on emergency relief<br />Recovery: reconstruction, focus on restocking, capacity building, infrastructure, natural resource management<br />DCM model aims to increase resilience and coping capacity of communities and households to reduce disaster risk<br />THIS SHOULD PROVIDE YOU WITH A FIRST LINK TO YOUR CHALLENGE: COME UP WITH THE UNDISCOVERED SOLUTION<br />17-8-2011 22:40<br />Cordaid Presentation<br />16<br />
  • 17. The sampling frame<br />Fourdistrictswereselected, pairingdistrictswith high and low levels of external disaster management intervention (Garissa, Marsabit, Samburu, Wajir)<br />Secondary data werecollectedfor district profiles to construct a district vulnerability index<br />Primary data werecollected at households (extendedfamiles): 50 foreach district, basedon a standard questionnaire<br />How representative is our own sample?<br />Four different models werespecified<br />PROBIT techniqueswereused to estimate relations between variables <br />17-8-2011 22:40<br />Cordaid Presentation<br />17<br />
  • 18. Measuringvulnerability<br />Vulnerability is a multidimensional factor, embodying the combinedeffects of unsafeconditions. We derivedproxies at the district level for the fourelements of the PAR model relating to:<br />Physical environment (weighteddroughtfrequency)<br />Localeconomy(humanpoverty index)<br />Social relations (populationgrowth)<br />Public actions(access to health, school enrollment)<br />17-8-2011 22:40<br />Cordaid Presentation<br />18<br />
  • 19. Measuringhousehold disaster risk<br />The household level foodconsumption deficit representsanidealdependentvariable, but is extremelydifficult to measure.<br />Four coping mechanisms have been used as proxies:<br />Liquidation of productiveassets<br />Foodconsumptionadjustments<br />Callingoncommunity level facilities<br />Relianceonemergencyrelief<br />17-8-2011 22:40<br />Cordaid Presentation<br />19<br />
  • 20. Ex-post coping capacity of households<br />Independent variable approximated by number of household characteristics:<br />Asset ownership<br />Proportion of economically active members<br />Dependency ratio<br />Educational attainment<br />Gender and age of household heads<br />17-8-2011 22:40<br />Cordaid Presentation<br />20<br />
  • 21. Strengthening ex-ante coping capacity applied in DCM model<br />Households can prepare themselves against adverse impacts through different actions such as:<br />Income diversification<br />Livestock diversification<br />Water reserve capacity<br />Use of common pastures<br />17-8-2011 22:40<br />Cordaid Presentation<br />21<br />
  • 22. The impact of droughtcycle management<br />Three out of four indicators of household disaster risk decreasewhenhouseholds have coping capacities as stimulated and reinforcedby the DCM model (ex ante):<br />Sustainablelivestock management systems<br />Incomediversfication<br />Water conservation<br />Community level safety net structures (e.g. Credit)<br />Reservinggrazing areas couldnotbeshown as a significant coping strategy<br />17-8-2011 22:40<br />Cordaid Presentation<br />22<br />

×