1. Vitamin D and
Osteoporosis
Iris Thiele Isip Tan MD, FPCP, FPSEM
Clinical Associate Professor, UP College of Medicine
Section of Endocrinology, Diabetes & Metabolism
Department of Medicine, Philippine General Hospital
2. Disclosure
Merck Sharp & Dohme (MSD)
Honoraria as RTD speaker
Travel grant for regional endocrine meeting
9. Vitamin D and Bone Metabolism
Gut
Renal distal
tubule
In vitamin D-
deficient state,
calcium absorption
decreases Low calcium causes
increase in PTH secretion
PTH
Low Levels of Vitamin D
Calcium reservoir of bone is depleted to
correct for low calcium absorption in gut
Mobilization of calcium
from bone
PTH
Balanced System
Calcium absorption meets metabolic demands
Normal bone mineralization is maintained
Dietary calcium
Circulation
Calcium
reabsorption
1
2
3
4
Vitamin D
Vitamin D
Adapted from Holick M. Curr Opin Endocrinol Diabetes. 2002;9:87–98; DeLuca HF. Am J Clin Nutr. 2004;80(suppl 1):1689S–1696S;
Lips P. Endocr Rev. 2001;22:477–501; Holick MF. J Nutr. 2005;135:2739S–2748S.
Parathyroid
10. isolated groups of individuals with discrete diseases (11–15).
Individuals who would otherwise be considered healthy typi-
much vitam
indeed, vita
nutrients be
because pe
need at all
Quantita
these recom
optimal lev
vitamin D
sources acc
total, the re
result in a s
Much wo
synthesis o
D economy
supplemen
25(OH)D co
viously (18
each 100 IU
an elevation
nmol/L). T
nmol/L) w
or her serum
Figure 3. Relationship of calcium absorption fraction to vitamin
D nutritional status [as measured by serum 25(OH)D] (9).
Calcium Absorption: Threshold Effect
32 ng/dL
Heaney R. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2008;3:1535-41
Vitamin D
metabolic utilization
4,000 IU/day
11. Vitamin D-fortified milk (400 IU/quart)
Cereals (40-50 IU/serving)
Egg yolks
Saltwater fish
Liver
Clinician’s Guide to the Prevention & Treatment of Osteoporosis
National Osteoporosis Foundation, 2008
Chief Dietary Sources of Vitamin D
12. Vitamin D: Recommended daily intake
The Hormone Foundation 2009
Recommended
daily intake
Vitamin D Calcium
Under age 50 400-800 IU at least 1,000 mg
Over age 50 800-1,000 IU at least 1,200 mg
13. • 10/11 RCTs: ↑ serum 25(OH)D
• Response depends on baseline level
‣ Greater if baseline 25(OH)D <50 nmol/L
• 0.7 nmol increase in serum 25(OH)D in
healthy young men for each 1 ug
(40 IU) of vitamin D
Brannon et al, Am J Nutr 2008;88:483S-90S
Response to Fortified Food
14. + 100 IU oral
vitamin D intake
= + 1 ng/mL
(2.5 nmol/L)
serum 25(OH)D
Rule of Thumb
Patient with a starting
serum 25(OH)D of 15
ng/mL would require
1,500 IU/d to bring his
level to 30 ng/mL
Heaney R. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2008;3:1535-41
15. Individualize requirements for
vitamin D supplementation
Sunlight
exposure
Skin
pigmentation
Baseline
vitamin D
level
Intestinal
absorption
rates
Type of vit D
supplement
(D3 is 3x
more potent
than D2)
Age
(reduced photo-
conversion of
7-dehydrocholesterol
to vit D)
Genetic
variation in
vitamin D
receptor
activity
Brown S, Alternative Medicine Review 2008
16. TOXICITY
Vitamin D supplementation
Trial characteristics
22 vitamin D trials with AE
outcomes
19 trials: adults only
Many too short to observe AEs
400-4,000 IU/d vit D3 (n=19)
5,000-10,000 IU/d vit D2 (n=2)
Cranney et al, Am J Clin Nutri 2008;88(suppl):513S-9S
Most frequently reported
Hypercalcemia
Hypercalciuria
More events in vit D
group but difference with
placebo group NS
Asymptomatic
17. TOXICITY
Vitamin D supplementation
Trial characteristics
7 trials reported kidney stone
incidence
5 trials had no cases
1 trial reported NS difference
1 reported increase in stones
(WHI)
Cranney et al, Am J Clin Nutri 2008;88(suppl):513S-9S
Women’s Health Initiative
n = 36,282
400 IU vitamin D3 +
1000 mg Ca vs Ca alone
5.7 events/10,000
women-years exposure
18. Institute of Medicine
Tolerable Upper
Intake Level (TUIL)
2,000 IU/day
No-observed-adverse-
effect-level (NOAEL)
10,000 IU/day
Heaney R. J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact 2006:6(4):334-
Serum 25(OH)D
32 ng/mL = minimum
daily intake of
2,600 IU vitamin D
(US residents)
19. 80-90% of vitamin D is
cutaneously produced
from sunlight
Limited by
age
higher latitudes
working indoors
use of sunscreen
skin pigmentation
cultural practices
precluding skin exposure
20. Bathing suit exposure
during summer
until skin just begins
to turn pink
⬇
skin production of
10,000 - 50,000 IU of
vitamin D3
Adams et al. NEJM 1982;306:772-775
21. Effect on serum
25(OH)D
4 RCTs using artificial
UVB light source
4 RCTs using solar
exposure
Nursing home residents
with low baseline 25(OH)D
Suberythemal UV light
exposure = 25(OH)D
28-42 nmol/L after 3 mos.
Cranney et al, Am J Clin Nutri 2008;88(suppl):513S-9S
22. “Fair evidence to suggest that artificial and solar
exposure increases 25(OH)D levels in vitamin D-
deficient and replete persons, including the elderly.”
Brannon et al, Am J Nutr 2008;88:483S-90S
23. TOXICITY
Sun exposure
“Is a specific level of sunlight
exposure sufficient to maintain
adequate vitamin D levels
without increasing the risk of
non-melanoma skin cancer or
melanoma?”
Cranney et al, Am J Clin Nutri 2008;88(suppl):513S-9S
No studies!
25. National Osteoporosis Foundation
Measure serum 25(OH)D in
those at risk of deficiency
elderly
malabsorption (i.e. celiac
disease)
chronic renal insufficiency
housebound
chronically ill
limited sun exposure
26. Low Vit D Status Despite Abundant Sun Exposure
Binkley et al, JCEM 2008; 92;2130-5
Serum 25(OH)D and PTH
Skin color: reflectance colorimetry
Sun exposure index: amount of
skin exposed X reported average
sun exposure per week without
sunscreen
University of Hawaii
A’ala Park Board Shop
Convenience sample of adults
in Honolulu, Hawaii (lat 21 ̊ )
n = 93 (63 ♂, 30♀)
Mean self-reported
sun exposure without
sunscreen use
22.4 h (range 2-96)
28.9 + 1.5 h/wk
27. Low Vit D Status Despite Abundant Sun Exposure
Binkley et al, JCEM 2008; 92;2130-5
51% of subjects had low vit D status
with serum 25(OH)D cutpoint of 30 ng/mL
Evolutionary?
Genetic differences:
Optimal amount of vit D
Cytochrome P450
Inadequate D3
Inadequate cutaneous production
Enhanced cutaneous destruction
of previt D3 or D3
Downregulation of cutaneous
synthesis by sun-induced melanin
production
Abnormalities of transport from
skin to circulation
28. Low Vit D Status Despite Abundant Sun Exposure
Sun exposure to the hands
and face for 15 minutes
may not be enough
Measure serum 25(OH)D?
Binkley et al, JCEM 2008; 92;2130-5
29. Measure serum 25(OH)D in otherwise
healthy women with osteoporosis?
Tannenbaum et al, JCEM 2002:87;4431-7
Objective:
Identify most useful/
cost-efficient screening
tests in detecting
secondary contributors
to osteoporosis
24-h urine Ca for all
If urine Ca abn,
serum Ca and PTH
Serum TSH for all
on T4 replacement
1 2
3 4 5
24-h urine Ca &
serum Ca for all
If urine Ca or serum
Ca abn, serum PTH
Serum TSH for all
on T4 replacement
24-h urine Ca, serum
Ca & PTH for all
Serum TSH for all on
T4 replacement
24-h urine Ca, serum
Ca, PTH and
25(OH)D for all
Serum TSH for all on
T4 replacement
Serum Ca, PTH and
25(OH)D for all
Serum TSH for all on
T4 replacement
n = 173 postmenopausal women, no known
contributors to osteoporosis on past medical history
30. Measure serum 25(OH)D in otherwise
healthy women with osteoporosis?
Tannenbaum et al, JCEM 2002:87;4431-7
Disorders identified:
56/173 women
Hypercalciuria most
common (9.8%; n=17)
vitamin D deficiency
(4.1%; n=7)
24-h urine Ca ➜
serum Ca & PTH
Serum TSH for all
on T4 replacement
1 2
3 4 5
24-h urine Ca &
serum Ca ➜ PTH
Serum TSH for all
on T4 replacement
24-h urine Ca, serum
Ca & PTH
Serum TSH for all on
T4 replacement
24-h urine Ca,
serum Ca, PTH and
25(OH)D for all
Serum TSH for all on
T4 replacement
Serum Ca, PTH and
25(OH)D for all
Serum TSH for all on
T4 replacement
n = 173 postmenopausal women, no known
contributors to osteoporosis on past medical history
n=33 n=35
n=48 n=55 n=37
31. Measure serum 25(OH)D in otherwise
healthy women with osteoporosis?
Tannenbaum et al, JCEM 2002:87;4431-7
24-h urine
Ca ➜ serum
Ca & PTH
Serum TSH
if indicated
1 2
24-h urine
Ca & serum
Ca ➜ PTH
Serum TSH
if indicated
24-h urine
Ca, serum
Ca & PTH
Serum TSH
if indicated
3
24-h urine
Ca, serum
Ca, PTH,
25(OH)D
Serum TSH
if indicated 4
Serum Ca,
PTH,
25(OH)D
Serum TSH if
indicated
5
n=33 (59%)
$22/patient
$116 per
diagnosis
n=35 (63%)
$30/patient
$148 per
diagnosis
n=48 (86%)
$75/patient
$272 per
diagnosis
n=55 (98%)
$116/patient
$366 per
diagnosis
n=37 (66%)
$108/patient
$506 per
diagnosis
1999: 24h urine Ca $8, serum Ca $7, PTH $57, serum 25(OH)D $41, TSH $23
32. Vitamin D Deficiency: A Common Occurrence in
Both High- and Low-energy Fractures
Steele et al, HSSJ 2008:4;143-8
44 orthopedic
trauma in-patients
(20♂, 24♀)
Low-energy fracture
fracture from a fall of standing height
High-energy fracture
fracture from a fall greater than
standing height or motor vehicle impact
review analyzed 44 orthopedic trauma in-patients admitted
from June 1, 2006 to February 1, 2007 for fracture care. The
44 patients comprised a consecutive series of patients seen
by one physician on the metabolic bone disease team. As
standard protocol, all patients admitted to the trauma service
at this hospital were seen by both the orthopedic trauma
service and the metabolic bone disease team. This standard
of care was established based on an increased awareness of
vitamin D deficiency and osteoporosis seen in orthopedic
arthroplasty patients [7]. Patients were included if they
sustained a documented fracture, had a 25-hydroxyvitamin
D level drawn after surgery in the hospital, and were greater
than or equal to 18 years of age. Patients were excluded if
they had any known risk factors for vitamin D deficiency,
such as renal insufficiency (as indicated by a creatinine
level of ≥2 mg/dl), malabsorption, gastrectomy, active liver
disease, acute myocardial infarction, alcoholism, anorexia
nervosa, or steroid dependency. In this study, the 25(OH)D
metabolite was used as a measurement of vitamin D status.
Although calcitriol (1,25-dihydroxvitamin D) is the most
potent vitamin D metabolite, the metabolite 25(OH)D
provides a more accurate account of vitamin D status [9,
20, 26, 29]. Serum 25(OH)D levels were measured through
the use of liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry.
Age, gender, and type of fracture were recorded for each
patient. This study included a total of 44 patients, 45.5%
men (n=20) and 54.5% women (n=24). The mean age for
all patients was 59±20 years, range 19–95 years. The mean
age for men was younger at 51±21 years than for women,
which was 66±17 years (p=0.02). The fractures were
classed as low-energy fracture vs. high-energy fracture.
Low-energy fractures were defined as fractures sustained
from a fall of standing height or less, while high-energy
fractures resulted from a fall greater than standing height or
a motor vehicle impact.
Univariate analysis was run on all variables; means,
standard deviations, medians, frequencies, etc., as appropri-
ate. All demographic and clinical variables were assessed
ml (Fig. 1).
The women in this series were more likely to be vitamin
D insufficient than the men, (p=0.03). Seventy five percent
(18/24) of women and 40% (8/20) of men were vitamin D
insufficient. Specifically, this gender difference was seen
within the high-energy fracture group in which significantly
more women (80%, 8/10) than men (25%, 4/16) were
vitamin D insufficient (p=0.01; Table 1a). There was a
Median 33.5
Median 27.5
32
Mean 29.8
Mean 30.3
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
Men Women
25(OH)D
[ng/ml]
Fig. 1. Vitamin D levels in this patient population sorted by patient
gender
26/44 (59%)
vit D deficient
18/24 (75%)
8/20 (40%)
33. Vitamin D Deficiency: A Common Occurrence in
Both High- and Low-energy Fractures
Steele et al, HSSJ 2008:4;143-8
y
%,
e
-
s,
n
s
h
%
e
s.
e-
el
)
Table 2 Age and 25(OH)D level vs. fracture etiology
Low-energy
fractures
High-energy
fractures
p value
a. Men
Agea
72.5±16 45.9±19 0.02c
25(OH)Db
19.5 34 0.007d
b. Women
Agea
71.1±14 57.8±18 0.053c
25(OH)Db
28 27 0.7d
a
Mean age in years ± standard deviation
b
Median 25(OH)D ng/ml
c
p values were calculated using the t test
d
p values were calculated using the Mann–Whitney test
145
34. What cut-off value defines
low vitamin D status?
Serum 25(OH)D
<25 nmol/L 25-75 nmol/L >75 nmol/L
Deficiency Insufficiency Sufficiency
Dawson-Hughes B, Am J Clin Nutr 2008:88(suppl);537S-40S
Variability of vit D concentration
by geographical location
Differences in assay methodology
Optimal level of
25(OH)D 30 ng/mL
determined in a
Caucasian population
35. Goal of vit D supplementation?
Serum 25(OH)D greater than an accepted
cutpoint (e.g. 30 ng/ml)
Upper limit of normal (a value that varies
between laboratories)
Binkley et al, JCEM 2008; 92;2130-5
37. Objective
To review the
effect of vitamin D
on bone density
and fractures in
postmenopausal
women
Data Source
MEDLINE and
EMBASE from
1966 to 1999
25 trials
Study Selection
Standard or
hydroxylated vitamin
D with or without Ca
suppl vs control
Measured bone
density or fracture
incidence >1 year
Meta-analysis of the Efficacy of Vitamin D
Treatment in Preventing Osteoporosis in
Postmenopausal Women
Guyatt et al, Endoc Rev 2002; 23(4);560-9
38. Meta-analysis of the Efficacy of Vitamin D
Treatment in Preventing Osteoporosis in
Postmenopausal Women
25 trials
Vitamin D (n=4017) vs
control (n=4107)
Patients with ↓bone
density (17 trials)
Standard vitamin D
(10 trials)
Hydroxylated
vitamin D (14 trials)
Both forms of
vitamin D (1 trial)
Follow-up: 1-5 y
Loss to follow-up
<10% (2 trials)
10-20% (8 trials)
>20% (13 trials)
unknown (2 trials)
Blinded (18 trials)
Unblinded (5 trials)
Blinding unclear
(2 trials)
Guyatt et al, Endoc Rev 2002; 23(4);560-9
39. Vitamin D Treatment in Preventing
Osteoporosis in Postmenopausal Women
RR with 95%CI for vertebral fractures
FIG. 2. RR with 95% CI for vertebral fractures after treatment with vitamin D.
. • Meta-Analyses of Osteoporosis Therapies Endocrine Reviews, August 2002, 23(4):560–5
Guyatt et al, Endoc Rev 2002; 23(4);560-9
40. Vitamin D Treatment in Preventing
Osteoporosis in Postmenopausal Women
RR with 95%CI for nonvertebral fractures
sites
hydroxylated trials patients
RR (95% CI)
value valu
Combined 8 1130 0.63 (0.45, 0.88) !0.01 0.16
Standard 1 160 0.33 (0.01, 8.05) 0.49 –
Hydroxylated 7 970 0.64 (0.44, 0.92) 0.02 0.11
rtebral Combined 6 6187 0.77 (0.57, 1.04) 0.09 0.09
Standard 3 5399 0.78 (0.55, 1.09) 0.15 0.05
Hydroxylated 3 788 0.87 (0.29, 2.59) 0.80 0.19
eted P ! 0.05 as indicating important between-study differences in results.
FIG. 3. RR with 95% CI for nonvertebral fractures after treatment with vitamin D.
Guyatt et al, Endoc Rev 2002; 23(4);560-9
41. Proposed Scientific and Ethical Guidelines for
Clinical Trials on Vitamin D and Fracture
Osteoporosis Education Project
Vitamin D levels
achieved should
be 32 ng/mL
Achievement of
vit D sufficiency
should be verified
by 25(OH)D
Only those with
25(OH)D >32 ng/
mL should be
included
Vit D
supplementation
must be continued
for at least 12 mos
Vit D3
(cholecalciferol)
should be used
1 2 3
4 5
Brown S, Alternative Medicine Review 2008
42. Trial
Trial Overview
(All RCTs)
Trial
Compliance
Serum Vit D
(Therapeutic
threshold is 32
ng/mL)
% Fracture
Reduction
French Decalyos
I Study
3270 ambulatory
elderly French
women
18-month trial
800 IU D3 w/ tri-
calcium phosphate
(1,200 mg elemental
Ca)
1,762 (54%)
completed the trial
Good supplement
compliance
16 ng/mL average
Vit D level at
baseline
42 ng/mL average
vit D level at
completion of trial
32% ↓ in all
non-vertebral
fractures
43% ↓ in hip
fractures
French Decalyos
I Study
Extension
3270 ambulatory
elderly French
women
18-month extension
of trial
800 IU D3 w/ tri-
calcium phosphate
(1,200 mg elemental
Ca)
Supplement
compliance unclear
but appears
adequate
16 ng/mL average
Vit D level at
baseline
42 ng/mL average
vit D level at
completion of trial
24% ↓ in all
non-vertebral
fractures
29% ↓ in hip
fractures
Vitamin D and Fracture Trials
Brown S, Alternative Medicine Review 2008
43. Trial
Trial Overview
(All RCTs)
Trial
Compliance
Serum Vit D
(Therapeutic
threshold is 32
ng/mL)
% Fracture
Reduction
French Decalyos
II Study
610 ambulatory
French women
2-year trial
800 IU of D3 with
tri-calcium
phosphate (1,200
mg elemental Ca)
422 (69%)
completed the trial
95% supplement
compliance
9 ng/mL average Vit
D level at baseline
30 ng/mL average
vit D level at
completion of trial
Non-significant
↓ in all non-
vertebral
fractures
31-38% ↓ in hip
fractures
British study of
vit D and
osteoporotic
fracture
2,686 community
living men and
women aged 65-85
5-year trial
100,000 IU tablets
of vit D3 every 4
months
75% of participants
took the vit D at
least 80% of the
time
66% compliance for
final dose
At 4 years
29 ng/mL average
Vit D level in those
on supplements
21 ng/mL average
vit D in placebo
group
33% overall ↓ of
fractures (hip,
wriat, spine,
forearm)
Vitamin D and Fracture Trials
Brown S, Alternative Medicine Review 2008
44. Trial
Trial Overview
(All RCTs)
Trial
Compliance
Serum Vit D
(Therapeutic
threshold is 32
ng/mL)
% Fracture
Reduction
Boston area
study
389 community
dwelling men &
women (mean age
74)
3-year trial
Intervention: 700 IU
D3 and 500 mg
elemental Ca (as
citrate maleate)
318 (82%)
completed the trial
Supplement
compliance
appears good
30 ng/mL average
Vit D level at
baseline
44 ng/mL average
vit D level at
completion of trial
60% ↓ in all non-
vertebral fractures
60% ↓ in hip
fractures
Japanese study
of sunlight
exposure on
BMD & hip
fracture
incidence
among vit D
deficient stroke
patients
258 stroke patients
12-month trial
50% of patients
had 15 minutes/day
of sunlight exposure
to face and hands
50% were sunlight
deprived
Compliance with
sunlight exposure
appears good
6.8 ng/mL average
Vit D level at
baseline
20.8 ng/mL average
vit D level at
completion of trial
Sixfold ↓ in hip
fracture incidence
in the sunlight-
exposed group
3.1%↑ in BMD in
sunlight-exposed
3.3% ↓ in BMD in
sunlight-deprived
Vitamin D and Fracture Trials
Brown S, Alternative Medicine Review 2008
45. Trial
Trial Overview
(All RCTs)
Trial
Compliance
Serum Vit D
(Therapeutic
threshold is 32
ng/mL)
% Fracture
Reduction
Japanese study
of hip fracture
reduction
among
Alzheimer’s
patients through
sunlight
exposure
284 Alzheimer’s
patients
12-month trial
1,200 mg elemental
calcium 2x/day to
both groups; 50%
of patients had 15
min/day of sunlight
exposure to face,
hands and forearms
(total exposed skin
area 426 +32 cm3);
50% of patients
were sunlight
deprived
Compliance with
sunlight exposure
appears good
9.6 ng/mL average
Vit D level at
baseline
20.8 ng/mL average
vit D level at
completion of trial
4x more frequent
non-vertebral
fractures in
sunlight-deprived
group (11 vs 3)
4x more frequent
hip fractures in
sunlight deprived-
group (9 vs 2)
2.7% ↑ in BMD in
sunlight-exposed
5.6% ↓ in BMD in
sunlight-deprived
Vitamin D and Fracture Trials
Brown S, Alternative Medicine Review 2008
46. Vitamin D and Fracture Trials
Some observations
Brown S, Alternative Medicine Review 2008
Supplementation
with 400 IU vitamin
D repeatedly found
to have no impact
on fracture
incidence
Bischoff-Ferrari et al meta-analysis
Pooling of 12 studies with 400 IU
vitamin D daily failed to influence
fracture incidence
700-800 IU daily of vitamin D
↓ hip fracture by 26%
↓ all fractures by 23%
47. Vitamin D and Fracture Trials
Some observations
Brown S, Alternative Medicine Review 2008
Vitamin D at an
800 IU daily dose
leads to 25(OH)D
levels of 32 ng/mL
in some but not
all subjects
Less than half of adults will
achieve 25(OH)D of 32 ng/mL
with 700-1,000 IU vitamin D
supplementation x 8 weeks
British RECORD trial
800 IU vitamin D in older adults raised
vit D to an average of 24.8 ng/mL
Swiss study
Vit D levels increased from 12.3 ng/mL
to 26.2 ng/mL in ambulatory elderly
given 800 IU D3 daily x 3 months
48. Vitamin D Status and Treatment of Postmenopausal
Osteoporosis with Bisphosphonates
25 (OH) D : 93 [3.3] nmol/L 25 (OH) D : 50 [1.9] nmol/L
#
112 women
On bisphosphonate
Etidronate (n=30)
Alendronate (n=64)
Risedronate (n=38)
Serum 25(OH)D <70
nmol/L (53%)
Deane et al, Alternative BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 2007
49. Objective
To evaluate how
supplementation
with vit D alone
affects risk of
falling, primarily in
postmenopausal
women
Data Source
MEDLINE,
EMBASE, BIOSIS
and Cochrane
database from Jan
1985 to June 2005
5 studies
Study Selection
Vitamin D vs placebo
Vit D + Ca vs calcium
alone
Studies which
enrolled both men
and women included
Risk of falls
Meta-analysis: Vitamin D and the Risk of Falls
Jackson et al, QJM 2007;100:185-192
50. 5 trials
All RCTs except 1
D3 used in all
D3 + Ca (4 trials)
Postmenopausal
women only (3 trials)
Mean baseline
25(OH)D were
inadequate (defined
as <76.2 nmol/L)
Duration 18 weeks
to over 5 years
D3 dose from 300
to 800 IU except 1
trial (oral capsule of
100,000 IU vit D3 q4
months)
Meta-analysis: Vitamin D and the Risk of Falls
Jackson et al, QJM 2007;100:185-192
51. Meta-analysis: Vitamin D and the Risk of Falls
Review: Vitamin D3 review
Comparison: 01 Falls
Outcome: 01 Falls including calcium
Study Vitamin D3 (+/− Ca) Control RR (fixed) Weight RR (fixed)
or sub-category n/N n/N 95% CI % 95% CI
Graafmans 62/177 66/177 16.82 0.94 [0.71, 1.24]
Pfeifer 11/70 19/67 4.95 0.55 [0.29, 1.08]
Bischoff 14/62 18/60 4.66 0.75 [0.41, 1.37]
Trivedi 100/270 92/255 24.11 1.03 [0.82, 1.29]
Grant 161/1306 196/1332 49.46 0.84 [0.69, 1.02]
Total (95% CI) 1885 1891 100.00 0.88 [0.78, 1.00]
Total events: 348 (Vitamin D3 (+/− Ca)), 391 (Control)
Test for heterogeneity: Chi² = 4.36, df = 4 (P = 0.36), I² = 8.3%
Test for overall effect: Z = 1.95 (P = 0.05)
0.1 0.2 0.5 1 2 5 10
Favours treatment Favours control
igure 1. Results of the meta-analysis for falls.
Review: Vitamin D3 review
Comparison: 01 Falls
Outcome: 02 Falls including calcium in post-menopausal women
Study Vitamin D3 (+/− Ca) Control RR (fixed) Weight RR (fixed)
or sub-category n/N n/N 95% CI % 95% CI
Pfeifer 11/70 19/67 14.67 0.55 [0.29, 1.08]
Bischoff 14/62 18/60 13.82 0.75 [0.41, 1.37]
Trivedi 100/270 92/255 71.50 1.03 [0.82, 1.29]
Total (95% CI) 402 382 100.00 0.92 [0.75, 1.12]
Total events: 125 (Vitamin D3 (+/− Ca)), 129 (Control)
, measured; N, not measured; a
RR reported in forest plots. b
Median value (mean reported unless otherwise stated)
umber of subjects in both groups.
Pooled RR for D3 preventing falls 0.88 (95%CI 0.78-1.00)
Postmenopausal women only
Pooled RR 0.81 (95%CI 0.48-1.34)
Jackson et al, QJM 2007;100:185-192
52. Vitamin D and the Risk of Falls
Randomized controlled trials
Trial
Vit D dose/
preparation
ug (IU)/d
Duration
of trial
25(OH)D level
achieved
nmol/L
Outcome
Muscle
performance
Sato
Pfeiffer
Bischoff
25(1000) D2
20 (800) D3
20 (800) D3
3 y
2 mo
3 mo
84
66
66
+
+
+
Falls
Bischoff
Broe
Flicker
Grant
17.5 (700) D3
20 (800) D2
20 (800) D2
20 (800) D3
3 y
5 mo
2 y
5 y
99
75
NA
62
+
+
+
Null
Dawson-Hughes, Am J Clin Nutr 2008;88(suppl):573S-40S
53. Vitamin D and Risk of Falls
Some observations
Trials assessing
impact of vit D on
falling more likely
to have positive
results when
conducted in
institutions
Presence of nursing staff
More accurate
ascertainment of falls
Higher supplement
compliance
Dawson-Hughes, Am J Clin Nutr 2008;88(suppl):573S-40S
54. Vitamin D and Risk of Falls
Some observations
Research has not
identified the
minimum 25(OH)D
level for maximal
benefit in fall
prevention
Trials indicate mean values
of 75 nmol/L and 99 nmol/L
? higher values might confer
benefit
Dawson-Hughes, Am J Clin Nutr 2008;88(suppl):573S-40S
55. Should vitamin D
levels be measured?
How much
vitamin D is enough?
Does supplemental
vitamin D reduce
fractures and falls?