SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 56
Download to read offline
Vitamin D and
Osteoporosis
Iris Thiele Isip Tan MD, FPCP, FPSEM
Clinical Associate Professor, UP College of Medicine
Section of Endocrinology, Diabetes & Metabolism
Department of Medicine, Philippine General Hospital
Disclosure
Merck Sharp & Dohme (MSD)
Honoraria as RTD speaker
Travel grant for regional endocrine meeting
How much
vitamin D is enough?
How much
vitamin D is enough?
Should vitamin D
levels be measured?
How much
vitamin D is enough?
Should vitamin D
levels be measured?
How much
vitamin D is enough?
Should vitamin D
levels be measured?
How much
vitamin D is enough?
Does supplemental
vitamin D reduce
fractures and falls?
How much
vitamin D is
enough?
Vitamin D and Bone Metabolism
Gut
Renal distal
tubule
In vitamin D-
deficient state,
calcium absorption
decreases Low calcium causes
increase in PTH secretion
PTH
Low Levels of Vitamin D
Calcium reservoir of bone is depleted to
correct for low calcium absorption in gut
Mobilization of calcium
from bone
PTH
Balanced System
Calcium absorption meets metabolic demands
Normal bone mineralization is maintained
Dietary calcium
Circulation
Calcium
reabsorption
1
2
3
4
Vitamin D
Vitamin D
Adapted from Holick M. Curr Opin Endocrinol Diabetes. 2002;9:87–98; DeLuca HF. Am J Clin Nutr. 2004;80(suppl 1):1689S–1696S;
Lips P. Endocr Rev. 2001;22:477–501; Holick MF. J Nutr. 2005;135:2739S–2748S.
Parathyroid
isolated groups of individuals with discrete diseases (11–15).
Individuals who would otherwise be considered healthy typi-
much vitam
indeed, vita
nutrients be
because pe
need at all
Quantita
these recom
optimal lev
vitamin D
sources acc
total, the re
result in a s
Much wo
synthesis o
D economy
supplemen
25(OH)D co
viously (18
each 100 IU
an elevation
nmol/L). T
nmol/L) w
or her serum
Figure 3. Relationship of calcium absorption fraction to vitamin
D nutritional status [as measured by serum 25(OH)D] (9).
Calcium Absorption: Threshold Effect
32 ng/dL
Heaney R. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2008;3:1535-41
Vitamin D
metabolic utilization
4,000 IU/day
Vitamin D-fortified milk (400 IU/quart)
Cereals (40-50 IU/serving)
Egg yolks
Saltwater fish
Liver
Clinician’s Guide to the Prevention & Treatment of Osteoporosis
National Osteoporosis Foundation, 2008
Chief Dietary Sources of Vitamin D
Vitamin D: Recommended daily intake
The Hormone Foundation 2009
Recommended
daily intake
Vitamin D Calcium
Under age 50 400-800 IU at least 1,000 mg
Over age 50 800-1,000 IU at least 1,200 mg
• 10/11 RCTs: ↑ serum 25(OH)D
• Response depends on baseline level
‣ Greater if baseline 25(OH)D <50 nmol/L
• 0.7 nmol increase in serum 25(OH)D in
healthy young men for each 1 ug
(40 IU) of vitamin D
Brannon et al, Am J Nutr 2008;88:483S-90S
Response to Fortified Food
+ 100 IU oral
vitamin D intake
= + 1 ng/mL
(2.5 nmol/L)
serum 25(OH)D
Rule of Thumb
Patient with a starting
serum 25(OH)D of 15
ng/mL would require
1,500 IU/d to bring his
level to 30 ng/mL
Heaney R. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2008;3:1535-41
Individualize requirements for
vitamin D supplementation
Sunlight
exposure
Skin
pigmentation
Baseline
vitamin D
level
Intestinal
absorption
rates
Type of vit D
supplement
(D3 is 3x
more potent
than D2)
Age
(reduced photo-
conversion of
7-dehydrocholesterol
to vit D)
Genetic
variation in
vitamin D
receptor
activity
Brown S, Alternative Medicine Review 2008
TOXICITY
Vitamin D supplementation
Trial characteristics
22 vitamin D trials with AE
outcomes
19 trials: adults only
Many too short to observe AEs
400-4,000 IU/d vit D3 (n=19)
5,000-10,000 IU/d vit D2 (n=2)
Cranney et al, Am J Clin Nutri 2008;88(suppl):513S-9S
Most frequently reported
Hypercalcemia
Hypercalciuria
More events in vit D
group but difference with
placebo group NS
Asymptomatic
TOXICITY
Vitamin D supplementation
Trial characteristics
7 trials reported kidney stone
incidence
5 trials had no cases
1 trial reported NS difference
1 reported increase in stones
(WHI)
Cranney et al, Am J Clin Nutri 2008;88(suppl):513S-9S
Women’s Health Initiative
n = 36,282
400 IU vitamin D3 +
1000 mg Ca vs Ca alone
5.7 events/10,000
women-years exposure
Institute of Medicine
Tolerable Upper
Intake Level (TUIL)
2,000 IU/day
No-observed-adverse-
effect-level (NOAEL)
10,000 IU/day
Heaney R. J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact 2006:6(4):334-
Serum 25(OH)D
32 ng/mL = minimum
daily intake of
2,600 IU vitamin D
(US residents)
80-90% of vitamin D is
cutaneously produced
from sunlight
Limited by
age
higher latitudes
working indoors
use of sunscreen
skin pigmentation
cultural practices
precluding skin exposure
Bathing suit exposure
during summer
until skin just begins
to turn pink
⬇
skin production of
10,000 - 50,000 IU of
vitamin D3
Adams et al. NEJM 1982;306:772-775
Effect on serum
25(OH)D
4 RCTs using artificial
UVB light source
4 RCTs using solar
exposure
Nursing home residents
with low baseline 25(OH)D
Suberythemal UV light
exposure = 25(OH)D
28-42 nmol/L after 3 mos.
Cranney et al, Am J Clin Nutri 2008;88(suppl):513S-9S
“Fair evidence to suggest that artificial and solar
exposure increases 25(OH)D levels in vitamin D-
deficient and replete persons, including the elderly.”
Brannon et al, Am J Nutr 2008;88:483S-90S
TOXICITY
Sun exposure
“Is a specific level of sunlight
exposure sufficient to maintain
adequate vitamin D levels
without increasing the risk of
non-melanoma skin cancer or
melanoma?”
Cranney et al, Am J Clin Nutri 2008;88(suppl):513S-9S
No studies!
Should
vitamin D
levels be
measured?
National Osteoporosis Foundation
Measure serum 25(OH)D in
those at risk of deficiency
elderly
malabsorption (i.e. celiac
disease)
chronic renal insufficiency
housebound
chronically ill
limited sun exposure
Low Vit D Status Despite Abundant Sun Exposure
Binkley et al, JCEM 2008; 92;2130-5
Serum 25(OH)D and PTH
Skin color: reflectance colorimetry
Sun exposure index: amount of
skin exposed X reported average
sun exposure per week without
sunscreen
University of Hawaii
A’ala Park Board Shop
Convenience sample of adults
in Honolulu, Hawaii (lat 21 ̊ )
n = 93 (63 ♂, 30♀)
Mean self-reported
sun exposure without
sunscreen use
22.4 h (range 2-96)
28.9 + 1.5 h/wk
Low Vit D Status Despite Abundant Sun Exposure
Binkley et al, JCEM 2008; 92;2130-5
51% of subjects had low vit D status
with serum 25(OH)D cutpoint of 30 ng/mL
Evolutionary?
Genetic differences:
Optimal amount of vit D
Cytochrome P450
Inadequate D3
Inadequate cutaneous production
Enhanced cutaneous destruction
of previt D3 or D3
Downregulation of cutaneous
synthesis by sun-induced melanin
production
Abnormalities of transport from
skin to circulation
Low Vit D Status Despite Abundant Sun Exposure
Sun exposure to the hands
and face for 15 minutes
may not be enough
Measure serum 25(OH)D?
Binkley et al, JCEM 2008; 92;2130-5
Measure serum 25(OH)D in otherwise
healthy women with osteoporosis?
Tannenbaum et al, JCEM 2002:87;4431-7
Objective:
Identify most useful/
cost-efficient screening
tests in detecting
secondary contributors
to osteoporosis
24-h urine Ca for all
If urine Ca abn,
serum Ca and PTH
Serum TSH for all
on T4 replacement
1 2
3 4 5
24-h urine Ca &
serum Ca for all
If urine Ca or serum
Ca abn, serum PTH
Serum TSH for all
on T4 replacement
24-h urine Ca, serum
Ca & PTH for all
Serum TSH for all on
T4 replacement
24-h urine Ca, serum
Ca, PTH and
25(OH)D for all
Serum TSH for all on
T4 replacement
Serum Ca, PTH and
25(OH)D for all
Serum TSH for all on
T4 replacement
n = 173 postmenopausal women, no known
contributors to osteoporosis on past medical history
Measure serum 25(OH)D in otherwise
healthy women with osteoporosis?
Tannenbaum et al, JCEM 2002:87;4431-7
Disorders identified:
56/173 women
Hypercalciuria most
common (9.8%; n=17)
vitamin D deficiency
(4.1%; n=7)
24-h urine Ca ➜
serum Ca & PTH
Serum TSH for all
on T4 replacement
1 2
3 4 5
24-h urine Ca &
serum Ca ➜ PTH
Serum TSH for all
on T4 replacement
24-h urine Ca, serum
Ca & PTH
Serum TSH for all on
T4 replacement
24-h urine Ca,
serum Ca, PTH and
25(OH)D for all
Serum TSH for all on
T4 replacement
Serum Ca, PTH and
25(OH)D for all
Serum TSH for all on
T4 replacement
n = 173 postmenopausal women, no known
contributors to osteoporosis on past medical history
n=33 n=35
n=48 n=55 n=37
Measure serum 25(OH)D in otherwise
healthy women with osteoporosis?
Tannenbaum et al, JCEM 2002:87;4431-7
24-h urine
Ca ➜ serum
Ca & PTH
Serum TSH
if indicated
1 2
24-h urine
Ca & serum
Ca ➜ PTH
Serum TSH
if indicated
24-h urine
Ca, serum
Ca & PTH
Serum TSH
if indicated
3
24-h urine
Ca, serum
Ca, PTH,
25(OH)D
Serum TSH
if indicated 4
Serum Ca,
PTH,
25(OH)D
Serum TSH if
indicated
5
n=33 (59%)
$22/patient
$116 per
diagnosis
n=35 (63%)
$30/patient
$148 per
diagnosis
n=48 (86%)
$75/patient
$272 per
diagnosis
n=55 (98%)
$116/patient
$366 per
diagnosis
n=37 (66%)
$108/patient
$506 per
diagnosis
1999: 24h urine Ca $8, serum Ca $7, PTH $57, serum 25(OH)D $41, TSH $23
Vitamin D Deficiency: A Common Occurrence in
Both High- and Low-energy Fractures
Steele et al, HSSJ 2008:4;143-8
44 orthopedic
trauma in-patients
(20♂, 24♀)
Low-energy fracture
fracture from a fall of standing height
High-energy fracture
fracture from a fall greater than
standing height or motor vehicle impact
review analyzed 44 orthopedic trauma in-patients admitted
from June 1, 2006 to February 1, 2007 for fracture care. The
44 patients comprised a consecutive series of patients seen
by one physician on the metabolic bone disease team. As
standard protocol, all patients admitted to the trauma service
at this hospital were seen by both the orthopedic trauma
service and the metabolic bone disease team. This standard
of care was established based on an increased awareness of
vitamin D deficiency and osteoporosis seen in orthopedic
arthroplasty patients [7]. Patients were included if they
sustained a documented fracture, had a 25-hydroxyvitamin
D level drawn after surgery in the hospital, and were greater
than or equal to 18 years of age. Patients were excluded if
they had any known risk factors for vitamin D deficiency,
such as renal insufficiency (as indicated by a creatinine
level of ≥2 mg/dl), malabsorption, gastrectomy, active liver
disease, acute myocardial infarction, alcoholism, anorexia
nervosa, or steroid dependency. In this study, the 25(OH)D
metabolite was used as a measurement of vitamin D status.
Although calcitriol (1,25-dihydroxvitamin D) is the most
potent vitamin D metabolite, the metabolite 25(OH)D
provides a more accurate account of vitamin D status [9,
20, 26, 29]. Serum 25(OH)D levels were measured through
the use of liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry.
Age, gender, and type of fracture were recorded for each
patient. This study included a total of 44 patients, 45.5%
men (n=20) and 54.5% women (n=24). The mean age for
all patients was 59±20 years, range 19–95 years. The mean
age for men was younger at 51±21 years than for women,
which was 66±17 years (p=0.02). The fractures were
classed as low-energy fracture vs. high-energy fracture.
Low-energy fractures were defined as fractures sustained
from a fall of standing height or less, while high-energy
fractures resulted from a fall greater than standing height or
a motor vehicle impact.
Univariate analysis was run on all variables; means,
standard deviations, medians, frequencies, etc., as appropri-
ate. All demographic and clinical variables were assessed
ml (Fig. 1).
The women in this series were more likely to be vitamin
D insufficient than the men, (p=0.03). Seventy five percent
(18/24) of women and 40% (8/20) of men were vitamin D
insufficient. Specifically, this gender difference was seen
within the high-energy fracture group in which significantly
more women (80%, 8/10) than men (25%, 4/16) were
vitamin D insufficient (p=0.01; Table 1a). There was a
Median 33.5
Median 27.5
32
Mean 29.8
Mean 30.3
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
Men Women
25(OH)D
[ng/ml]
Fig. 1. Vitamin D levels in this patient population sorted by patient
gender
26/44 (59%)
vit D deficient
18/24 (75%)
8/20 (40%)
Vitamin D Deficiency: A Common Occurrence in
Both High- and Low-energy Fractures
Steele et al, HSSJ 2008:4;143-8
y
%,
e
-
s,
n
s
h
%
e
s.
e-
el
)
Table 2 Age and 25(OH)D level vs. fracture etiology
Low-energy
fractures
High-energy
fractures
p value
a. Men
Agea
72.5±16 45.9±19 0.02c
25(OH)Db
19.5 34 0.007d
b. Women
Agea
71.1±14 57.8±18 0.053c
25(OH)Db
28 27 0.7d
a
Mean age in years ± standard deviation
b
Median 25(OH)D ng/ml
c
p values were calculated using the t test
d
p values were calculated using the Mann–Whitney test
145
What cut-off value defines
low vitamin D status?
Serum 25(OH)D
<25 nmol/L 25-75 nmol/L >75 nmol/L
Deficiency Insufficiency Sufficiency
Dawson-Hughes B, Am J Clin Nutr 2008:88(suppl);537S-40S
Variability of vit D concentration
by geographical location
Differences in assay methodology
Optimal level of
25(OH)D 30 ng/mL
determined in a
Caucasian population
Goal of vit D supplementation?
Serum 25(OH)D greater than an accepted
cutpoint (e.g. 30 ng/ml)
Upper limit of normal (a value that varies
between laboratories)
Binkley et al, JCEM 2008; 92;2130-5
Does
supplemental
vitamin D
reduce fractures
and falls?
Objective
To review the
effect of vitamin D
on bone density
and fractures in
postmenopausal
women
Data Source
MEDLINE and
EMBASE from
1966 to 1999
25 trials
Study Selection
Standard or
hydroxylated vitamin
D with or without Ca
suppl vs control
Measured bone
density or fracture
incidence >1 year
Meta-analysis of the Efficacy of Vitamin D
Treatment in Preventing Osteoporosis in
Postmenopausal Women
Guyatt et al, Endoc Rev 2002; 23(4);560-9
Meta-analysis of the Efficacy of Vitamin D
Treatment in Preventing Osteoporosis in
Postmenopausal Women
25 trials
Vitamin D (n=4017) vs
control (n=4107)
Patients with ↓bone
density (17 trials)
Standard vitamin D
(10 trials)
Hydroxylated
vitamin D (14 trials)
Both forms of
vitamin D (1 trial)
Follow-up: 1-5 y
Loss to follow-up
<10% (2 trials)
10-20% (8 trials)
>20% (13 trials)
unknown (2 trials)
Blinded (18 trials)
Unblinded (5 trials)
Blinding unclear
(2 trials)
Guyatt et al, Endoc Rev 2002; 23(4);560-9
Vitamin D Treatment in Preventing
Osteoporosis in Postmenopausal Women
RR with 95%CI for vertebral fractures
FIG. 2. RR with 95% CI for vertebral fractures after treatment with vitamin D.
. • Meta-Analyses of Osteoporosis Therapies Endocrine Reviews, August 2002, 23(4):560–5
Guyatt et al, Endoc Rev 2002; 23(4);560-9
Vitamin D Treatment in Preventing
Osteoporosis in Postmenopausal Women
RR with 95%CI for nonvertebral fractures
sites
hydroxylated trials patients
RR (95% CI)
value valu
Combined 8 1130 0.63 (0.45, 0.88) !0.01 0.16
Standard 1 160 0.33 (0.01, 8.05) 0.49 –
Hydroxylated 7 970 0.64 (0.44, 0.92) 0.02 0.11
rtebral Combined 6 6187 0.77 (0.57, 1.04) 0.09 0.09
Standard 3 5399 0.78 (0.55, 1.09) 0.15 0.05
Hydroxylated 3 788 0.87 (0.29, 2.59) 0.80 0.19
eted P ! 0.05 as indicating important between-study differences in results.
FIG. 3. RR with 95% CI for nonvertebral fractures after treatment with vitamin D.
Guyatt et al, Endoc Rev 2002; 23(4);560-9
Proposed Scientific and Ethical Guidelines for
Clinical Trials on Vitamin D and Fracture
Osteoporosis Education Project
Vitamin D levels
achieved should
be 32 ng/mL
Achievement of
vit D sufficiency
should be verified
by 25(OH)D
Only those with
25(OH)D >32 ng/
mL should be
included
Vit D
supplementation
must be continued
for at least 12 mos
Vit D3
(cholecalciferol)
should be used
1 2 3
4 5
Brown S, Alternative Medicine Review 2008
Trial
Trial Overview
(All RCTs)
Trial
Compliance
Serum Vit D
(Therapeutic
threshold is 32
ng/mL)
% Fracture
Reduction
French Decalyos
I Study
3270 ambulatory
elderly French
women
18-month trial
800 IU D3 w/ tri-
calcium phosphate
(1,200 mg elemental
Ca)
1,762 (54%)
completed the trial
Good supplement
compliance
16 ng/mL average
Vit D level at
baseline
42 ng/mL average
vit D level at
completion of trial
32% ↓ in all
non-vertebral
fractures
43% ↓ in hip
fractures
French Decalyos
I Study
Extension
3270 ambulatory
elderly French
women
18-month extension
of trial
800 IU D3 w/ tri-
calcium phosphate
(1,200 mg elemental
Ca)
Supplement
compliance unclear
but appears
adequate
16 ng/mL average
Vit D level at
baseline
42 ng/mL average
vit D level at
completion of trial
24% ↓ in all
non-vertebral
fractures
29% ↓ in hip
fractures
Vitamin D and Fracture Trials
Brown S, Alternative Medicine Review 2008
Trial
Trial Overview
(All RCTs)
Trial
Compliance
Serum Vit D
(Therapeutic
threshold is 32
ng/mL)
% Fracture
Reduction
French Decalyos
II Study
610 ambulatory
French women
2-year trial
800 IU of D3 with
tri-calcium
phosphate (1,200
mg elemental Ca)
422 (69%)
completed the trial
95% supplement
compliance
9 ng/mL average Vit
D level at baseline
30 ng/mL average
vit D level at
completion of trial
Non-significant
↓ in all non-
vertebral
fractures
31-38% ↓ in hip
fractures
British study of
vit D and
osteoporotic
fracture
2,686 community
living men and
women aged 65-85
5-year trial
100,000 IU tablets
of vit D3 every 4
months
75% of participants
took the vit D at
least 80% of the
time
66% compliance for
final dose
At 4 years
29 ng/mL average
Vit D level in those
on supplements
21 ng/mL average
vit D in placebo
group
33% overall ↓ of
fractures (hip,
wriat, spine,
forearm)
Vitamin D and Fracture Trials
Brown S, Alternative Medicine Review 2008
Trial
Trial Overview
(All RCTs)
Trial
Compliance
Serum Vit D
(Therapeutic
threshold is 32
ng/mL)
% Fracture
Reduction
Boston area
study
389 community
dwelling men &
women (mean age
74)
3-year trial
Intervention: 700 IU
D3 and 500 mg
elemental Ca (as
citrate maleate)
318 (82%)
completed the trial
Supplement
compliance
appears good
30 ng/mL average
Vit D level at
baseline
44 ng/mL average
vit D level at
completion of trial
60% ↓ in all non-
vertebral fractures
60% ↓ in hip
fractures
Japanese study
of sunlight
exposure on
BMD & hip
fracture
incidence
among vit D
deficient stroke
patients
258 stroke patients
12-month trial
50% of patients
had 15 minutes/day
of sunlight exposure
to face and hands
50% were sunlight
deprived
Compliance with
sunlight exposure
appears good
6.8 ng/mL average
Vit D level at
baseline
20.8 ng/mL average
vit D level at
completion of trial
Sixfold ↓ in hip
fracture incidence
in the sunlight-
exposed group
3.1%↑ in BMD in
sunlight-exposed
3.3% ↓ in BMD in
sunlight-deprived
Vitamin D and Fracture Trials
Brown S, Alternative Medicine Review 2008
Trial
Trial Overview
(All RCTs)
Trial
Compliance
Serum Vit D
(Therapeutic
threshold is 32
ng/mL)
% Fracture
Reduction
Japanese study
of hip fracture
reduction
among
Alzheimer’s
patients through
sunlight
exposure
284 Alzheimer’s
patients
12-month trial
1,200 mg elemental
calcium 2x/day to
both groups; 50%
of patients had 15
min/day of sunlight
exposure to face,
hands and forearms
(total exposed skin
area 426 +32 cm3);
50% of patients
were sunlight
deprived
Compliance with
sunlight exposure
appears good
9.6 ng/mL average
Vit D level at
baseline
20.8 ng/mL average
vit D level at
completion of trial
4x more frequent
non-vertebral
fractures in
sunlight-deprived
group (11 vs 3)
4x more frequent
hip fractures in
sunlight deprived-
group (9 vs 2)
2.7% ↑ in BMD in
sunlight-exposed
5.6% ↓ in BMD in
sunlight-deprived
Vitamin D and Fracture Trials
Brown S, Alternative Medicine Review 2008
Vitamin D and Fracture Trials
Some observations
Brown S, Alternative Medicine Review 2008
Supplementation
with 400 IU vitamin
D repeatedly found
to have no impact
on fracture
incidence
Bischoff-Ferrari et al meta-analysis
Pooling of 12 studies with 400 IU
vitamin D daily failed to influence
fracture incidence
700-800 IU daily of vitamin D
↓ hip fracture by 26%
↓ all fractures by 23%
Vitamin D and Fracture Trials
Some observations
Brown S, Alternative Medicine Review 2008
Vitamin D at an
800 IU daily dose
leads to 25(OH)D
levels of 32 ng/mL
in some but not
all subjects
Less than half of adults will
achieve 25(OH)D of 32 ng/mL
with 700-1,000 IU vitamin D
supplementation x 8 weeks
British RECORD trial
800 IU vitamin D in older adults raised
vit D to an average of 24.8 ng/mL
Swiss study
Vit D levels increased from 12.3 ng/mL
to 26.2 ng/mL in ambulatory elderly
given 800 IU D3 daily x 3 months
Vitamin D Status and Treatment of Postmenopausal
Osteoporosis with Bisphosphonates
25 (OH) D : 93 [3.3] nmol/L 25 (OH) D : 50 [1.9] nmol/L
#
112 women
On bisphosphonate
Etidronate (n=30)
Alendronate (n=64)
Risedronate (n=38)
Serum 25(OH)D <70
nmol/L (53%)
Deane et al, Alternative BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 2007
Objective
To evaluate how
supplementation
with vit D alone
affects risk of
falling, primarily in
postmenopausal
women
Data Source
MEDLINE,
EMBASE, BIOSIS
and Cochrane
database from Jan
1985 to June 2005
5 studies
Study Selection
Vitamin D vs placebo
Vit D + Ca vs calcium
alone
Studies which
enrolled both men
and women included
Risk of falls
Meta-analysis: Vitamin D and the Risk of Falls
Jackson et al, QJM 2007;100:185-192
5 trials
All RCTs except 1
D3 used in all
D3 + Ca (4 trials)
Postmenopausal
women only (3 trials)
Mean baseline
25(OH)D were
inadequate (defined
as <76.2 nmol/L)
Duration 18 weeks
to over 5 years
D3 dose from 300
to 800 IU except 1
trial (oral capsule of
100,000 IU vit D3 q4
months)
Meta-analysis: Vitamin D and the Risk of Falls
Jackson et al, QJM 2007;100:185-192
Meta-analysis: Vitamin D and the Risk of Falls
Review: Vitamin D3 review
Comparison: 01 Falls
Outcome: 01 Falls including calcium
Study Vitamin D3 (+/− Ca) Control RR (fixed) Weight RR (fixed)
or sub-category n/N n/N 95% CI % 95% CI
Graafmans 62/177 66/177 16.82 0.94 [0.71, 1.24]
Pfeifer 11/70 19/67 4.95 0.55 [0.29, 1.08]
Bischoff 14/62 18/60 4.66 0.75 [0.41, 1.37]
Trivedi 100/270 92/255 24.11 1.03 [0.82, 1.29]
Grant 161/1306 196/1332 49.46 0.84 [0.69, 1.02]
Total (95% CI) 1885 1891 100.00 0.88 [0.78, 1.00]
Total events: 348 (Vitamin D3 (+/− Ca)), 391 (Control)
Test for heterogeneity: Chi² = 4.36, df = 4 (P = 0.36), I² = 8.3%
Test for overall effect: Z = 1.95 (P = 0.05)
0.1 0.2 0.5 1 2 5 10
Favours treatment Favours control
igure 1. Results of the meta-analysis for falls.
Review: Vitamin D3 review
Comparison: 01 Falls
Outcome: 02 Falls including calcium in post-menopausal women
Study Vitamin D3 (+/− Ca) Control RR (fixed) Weight RR (fixed)
or sub-category n/N n/N 95% CI % 95% CI
Pfeifer 11/70 19/67 14.67 0.55 [0.29, 1.08]
Bischoff 14/62 18/60 13.82 0.75 [0.41, 1.37]
Trivedi 100/270 92/255 71.50 1.03 [0.82, 1.29]
Total (95% CI) 402 382 100.00 0.92 [0.75, 1.12]
Total events: 125 (Vitamin D3 (+/− Ca)), 129 (Control)
, measured; N, not measured; a
RR reported in forest plots. b
Median value (mean reported unless otherwise stated)
umber of subjects in both groups.
Pooled RR for D3 preventing falls 0.88 (95%CI 0.78-1.00)
Postmenopausal women only
Pooled RR 0.81 (95%CI 0.48-1.34)
Jackson et al, QJM 2007;100:185-192
Vitamin D and the Risk of Falls
Randomized controlled trials
Trial
Vit D dose/
preparation
ug (IU)/d
Duration
of trial
25(OH)D level
achieved
nmol/L
Outcome
Muscle
performance
Sato
Pfeiffer
Bischoff
25(1000) D2
20 (800) D3
20 (800) D3
3 y
2 mo
3 mo
84
66
66
+
+
+
Falls
Bischoff
Broe
Flicker
Grant
17.5 (700) D3
20 (800) D2
20 (800) D2
20 (800) D3
3 y
5 mo
2 y
5 y
99
75
NA
62
+
+
+
Null
Dawson-Hughes, Am J Clin Nutr 2008;88(suppl):573S-40S
Vitamin D and Risk of Falls
Some observations
Trials assessing
impact of vit D on
falling more likely
to have positive
results when
conducted in
institutions
Presence of nursing staff
More accurate
ascertainment of falls
Higher supplement
compliance
Dawson-Hughes, Am J Clin Nutr 2008;88(suppl):573S-40S
Vitamin D and Risk of Falls
Some observations
Research has not
identified the
minimum 25(OH)D
level for maximal
benefit in fall
prevention
Trials indicate mean values
of 75 nmol/L and 99 nmol/L
? higher values might confer
benefit
Dawson-Hughes, Am J Clin Nutr 2008;88(suppl):573S-40S
Should vitamin D
levels be measured?
How much
vitamin D is enough?
Does supplemental
vitamin D reduce
fractures and falls?
Thank You
http://www.endocrine-witch.info

More Related Content

What's hot (20)

Cholecalciferol
CholecalciferolCholecalciferol
Cholecalciferol
 
Vitamin d-deficiency
Vitamin d-deficiencyVitamin d-deficiency
Vitamin d-deficiency
 
Vitamin D
Vitamin DVitamin D
Vitamin D
 
Vitamin D and its clinical applications
Vitamin D and its clinical applicationsVitamin D and its clinical applications
Vitamin D and its clinical applications
 
Vitamin D
Vitamin DVitamin D
Vitamin D
 
Vitamin - D
Vitamin - DVitamin - D
Vitamin - D
 
Vit D
Vit DVit D
Vit D
 
VITAMIN D
VITAMIN D VITAMIN D
VITAMIN D
 
Vitamin D
Vitamin  DVitamin  D
Vitamin D
 
Vitamin D Deficiency, by Dr. Mihir Adhikari
Vitamin D Deficiency, by Dr. Mihir Adhikari Vitamin D Deficiency, by Dr. Mihir Adhikari
Vitamin D Deficiency, by Dr. Mihir Adhikari
 
Hypertension
HypertensionHypertension
Hypertension
 
Vit d
Vit dVit d
Vit d
 
Vitamin d- Dr.Sohail
Vitamin d- Dr.SohailVitamin d- Dr.Sohail
Vitamin d- Dr.Sohail
 
Vitamin c
Vitamin cVitamin c
Vitamin c
 
Calcium Supplement
Calcium SupplementCalcium Supplement
Calcium Supplement
 
Vitamin D basics
Vitamin D basicsVitamin D basics
Vitamin D basics
 
Need of Vitamin D3 supplement | Buy Vitamin D3 in Europe
Need of Vitamin D3 supplement | Buy Vitamin D3 in EuropeNeed of Vitamin D3 supplement | Buy Vitamin D3 in Europe
Need of Vitamin D3 supplement | Buy Vitamin D3 in Europe
 
Calcium Metabolism
Calcium MetabolismCalcium Metabolism
Calcium Metabolism
 
Vitamind presentation advanced
Vitamind presentation  advancedVitamind presentation  advanced
Vitamind presentation advanced
 
Vitamin d deficiency – myths & facts
Vitamin d deficiency  – myths & factsVitamin d deficiency  – myths & facts
Vitamin d deficiency – myths & facts
 

More from Iris Thiele Isip-Tan

AI in Pediatrics: Taking Baby Steps in the Big World of Data
AI in Pediatrics: Taking Baby Steps in the Big World of DataAI in Pediatrics: Taking Baby Steps in the Big World of Data
AI in Pediatrics: Taking Baby Steps in the Big World of DataIris Thiele Isip-Tan
 
Artificial Intelligence in Health Professions Education
Artificial Intelligence in Health Professions EducationArtificial Intelligence in Health Professions Education
Artificial Intelligence in Health Professions EducationIris Thiele Isip-Tan
 
Artificial Intelligence: Diabetes Management
Artificial Intelligence: Diabetes ManagementArtificial Intelligence: Diabetes Management
Artificial Intelligence: Diabetes ManagementIris Thiele Isip-Tan
 
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare: Challenges, Risks, Benefits
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare: Challenges, Risks, BenefitsArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare: Challenges, Risks, Benefits
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare: Challenges, Risks, BenefitsIris Thiele Isip-Tan
 
Artificial Intelligence in Biology Research and Instruction
Artificial Intelligence in Biology Research and InstructionArtificial Intelligence in Biology Research and Instruction
Artificial Intelligence in Biology Research and InstructionIris Thiele Isip-Tan
 
Artificial Intelligence in Health and Research
Artificial Intelligence in Health and ResearchArtificial Intelligence in Health and Research
Artificial Intelligence in Health and ResearchIris Thiele Isip-Tan
 
Artificial Intelligence: Ethical Issues in Residency Training
Artificial Intelligence: Ethical Issues in Residency TrainingArtificial Intelligence: Ethical Issues in Residency Training
Artificial Intelligence: Ethical Issues in Residency TrainingIris Thiele Isip-Tan
 
Use of AI: Misinformation on Social Media
Use of AI: Misinformation on Social MediaUse of AI: Misinformation on Social Media
Use of AI: Misinformation on Social MediaIris Thiele Isip-Tan
 
Blended Learning: Strategies for Student Engagement
Blended Learning: Strategies for Student EngagementBlended Learning: Strategies for Student Engagement
Blended Learning: Strategies for Student EngagementIris Thiele Isip-Tan
 
EMR Documentation: Challenges and Opportunities
EMR Documentation: Challenges and Opportunities EMR Documentation: Challenges and Opportunities
EMR Documentation: Challenges and Opportunities Iris Thiele Isip-Tan
 
How EMRs Improve Patient Management
How EMRs Improve Patient Management How EMRs Improve Patient Management
How EMRs Improve Patient Management Iris Thiele Isip-Tan
 
AI in Healthcare: Risks, Challenges, Benefits
AI in Healthcare: Risks, Challenges, BenefitsAI in Healthcare: Risks, Challenges, Benefits
AI in Healthcare: Risks, Challenges, BenefitsIris Thiele Isip-Tan
 
Social Media: Navigating the Ethics of Influence on Public Trust
Social Media: Navigating the Ethics of Influence on Public Trust Social Media: Navigating the Ethics of Influence on Public Trust
Social Media: Navigating the Ethics of Influence on Public Trust Iris Thiele Isip-Tan
 
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare: Risks, Challenges, and Benefits
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare: Risks, Challenges, and Benefits Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare: Risks, Challenges, and Benefits
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare: Risks, Challenges, and Benefits Iris Thiele Isip-Tan
 
Gamification: Gen Z Teaching & Learning
Gamification: Gen Z Teaching & LearningGamification: Gen Z Teaching & Learning
Gamification: Gen Z Teaching & LearningIris Thiele Isip-Tan
 
Telepediatrics: Moving Toward Usual Care
Telepediatrics: Moving Toward Usual Care Telepediatrics: Moving Toward Usual Care
Telepediatrics: Moving Toward Usual Care Iris Thiele Isip-Tan
 
Role of Social Media in Healthcare: An Internist's Perspective
Role of Social Media in Healthcare: An Internist's PerspectiveRole of Social Media in Healthcare: An Internist's Perspective
Role of Social Media in Healthcare: An Internist's PerspectiveIris Thiele Isip-Tan
 
Digitalizing Education: Teaching for Transformation of Healthcare Professionals
Digitalizing Education: Teaching for Transformation of Healthcare ProfessionalsDigitalizing Education: Teaching for Transformation of Healthcare Professionals
Digitalizing Education: Teaching for Transformation of Healthcare ProfessionalsIris Thiele Isip-Tan
 
Jamboards, Digital Escape Rooms and ChatGPT
Jamboards, Digital Escape Rooms and ChatGPTJamboards, Digital Escape Rooms and ChatGPT
Jamboards, Digital Escape Rooms and ChatGPTIris Thiele Isip-Tan
 
Social Media Influence: Impact on Public Trust
Social Media Influence: Impact on Public TrustSocial Media Influence: Impact on Public Trust
Social Media Influence: Impact on Public TrustIris Thiele Isip-Tan
 

More from Iris Thiele Isip-Tan (20)

AI in Pediatrics: Taking Baby Steps in the Big World of Data
AI in Pediatrics: Taking Baby Steps in the Big World of DataAI in Pediatrics: Taking Baby Steps in the Big World of Data
AI in Pediatrics: Taking Baby Steps in the Big World of Data
 
Artificial Intelligence in Health Professions Education
Artificial Intelligence in Health Professions EducationArtificial Intelligence in Health Professions Education
Artificial Intelligence in Health Professions Education
 
Artificial Intelligence: Diabetes Management
Artificial Intelligence: Diabetes ManagementArtificial Intelligence: Diabetes Management
Artificial Intelligence: Diabetes Management
 
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare: Challenges, Risks, Benefits
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare: Challenges, Risks, BenefitsArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare: Challenges, Risks, Benefits
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare: Challenges, Risks, Benefits
 
Artificial Intelligence in Biology Research and Instruction
Artificial Intelligence in Biology Research and InstructionArtificial Intelligence in Biology Research and Instruction
Artificial Intelligence in Biology Research and Instruction
 
Artificial Intelligence in Health and Research
Artificial Intelligence in Health and ResearchArtificial Intelligence in Health and Research
Artificial Intelligence in Health and Research
 
Artificial Intelligence: Ethical Issues in Residency Training
Artificial Intelligence: Ethical Issues in Residency TrainingArtificial Intelligence: Ethical Issues in Residency Training
Artificial Intelligence: Ethical Issues in Residency Training
 
Use of AI: Misinformation on Social Media
Use of AI: Misinformation on Social MediaUse of AI: Misinformation on Social Media
Use of AI: Misinformation on Social Media
 
Blended Learning: Strategies for Student Engagement
Blended Learning: Strategies for Student EngagementBlended Learning: Strategies for Student Engagement
Blended Learning: Strategies for Student Engagement
 
EMR Documentation: Challenges and Opportunities
EMR Documentation: Challenges and Opportunities EMR Documentation: Challenges and Opportunities
EMR Documentation: Challenges and Opportunities
 
How EMRs Improve Patient Management
How EMRs Improve Patient Management How EMRs Improve Patient Management
How EMRs Improve Patient Management
 
AI in Healthcare: Risks, Challenges, Benefits
AI in Healthcare: Risks, Challenges, BenefitsAI in Healthcare: Risks, Challenges, Benefits
AI in Healthcare: Risks, Challenges, Benefits
 
Social Media: Navigating the Ethics of Influence on Public Trust
Social Media: Navigating the Ethics of Influence on Public Trust Social Media: Navigating the Ethics of Influence on Public Trust
Social Media: Navigating the Ethics of Influence on Public Trust
 
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare: Risks, Challenges, and Benefits
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare: Risks, Challenges, and Benefits Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare: Risks, Challenges, and Benefits
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare: Risks, Challenges, and Benefits
 
Gamification: Gen Z Teaching & Learning
Gamification: Gen Z Teaching & LearningGamification: Gen Z Teaching & Learning
Gamification: Gen Z Teaching & Learning
 
Telepediatrics: Moving Toward Usual Care
Telepediatrics: Moving Toward Usual Care Telepediatrics: Moving Toward Usual Care
Telepediatrics: Moving Toward Usual Care
 
Role of Social Media in Healthcare: An Internist's Perspective
Role of Social Media in Healthcare: An Internist's PerspectiveRole of Social Media in Healthcare: An Internist's Perspective
Role of Social Media in Healthcare: An Internist's Perspective
 
Digitalizing Education: Teaching for Transformation of Healthcare Professionals
Digitalizing Education: Teaching for Transformation of Healthcare ProfessionalsDigitalizing Education: Teaching for Transformation of Healthcare Professionals
Digitalizing Education: Teaching for Transformation of Healthcare Professionals
 
Jamboards, Digital Escape Rooms and ChatGPT
Jamboards, Digital Escape Rooms and ChatGPTJamboards, Digital Escape Rooms and ChatGPT
Jamboards, Digital Escape Rooms and ChatGPT
 
Social Media Influence: Impact on Public Trust
Social Media Influence: Impact on Public TrustSocial Media Influence: Impact on Public Trust
Social Media Influence: Impact on Public Trust
 

Vitamin D and Osteoporosis

  • 1. Vitamin D and Osteoporosis Iris Thiele Isip Tan MD, FPCP, FPSEM Clinical Associate Professor, UP College of Medicine Section of Endocrinology, Diabetes & Metabolism Department of Medicine, Philippine General Hospital
  • 2. Disclosure Merck Sharp & Dohme (MSD) Honoraria as RTD speaker Travel grant for regional endocrine meeting
  • 3. How much vitamin D is enough?
  • 4. How much vitamin D is enough?
  • 5. Should vitamin D levels be measured? How much vitamin D is enough?
  • 6. Should vitamin D levels be measured? How much vitamin D is enough?
  • 7. Should vitamin D levels be measured? How much vitamin D is enough? Does supplemental vitamin D reduce fractures and falls?
  • 8. How much vitamin D is enough?
  • 9. Vitamin D and Bone Metabolism Gut Renal distal tubule In vitamin D- deficient state, calcium absorption decreases Low calcium causes increase in PTH secretion PTH Low Levels of Vitamin D Calcium reservoir of bone is depleted to correct for low calcium absorption in gut Mobilization of calcium from bone PTH Balanced System Calcium absorption meets metabolic demands Normal bone mineralization is maintained Dietary calcium Circulation Calcium reabsorption 1 2 3 4 Vitamin D Vitamin D Adapted from Holick M. Curr Opin Endocrinol Diabetes. 2002;9:87–98; DeLuca HF. Am J Clin Nutr. 2004;80(suppl 1):1689S–1696S; Lips P. Endocr Rev. 2001;22:477–501; Holick MF. J Nutr. 2005;135:2739S–2748S. Parathyroid
  • 10. isolated groups of individuals with discrete diseases (11–15). Individuals who would otherwise be considered healthy typi- much vitam indeed, vita nutrients be because pe need at all Quantita these recom optimal lev vitamin D sources acc total, the re result in a s Much wo synthesis o D economy supplemen 25(OH)D co viously (18 each 100 IU an elevation nmol/L). T nmol/L) w or her serum Figure 3. Relationship of calcium absorption fraction to vitamin D nutritional status [as measured by serum 25(OH)D] (9). Calcium Absorption: Threshold Effect 32 ng/dL Heaney R. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2008;3:1535-41 Vitamin D metabolic utilization 4,000 IU/day
  • 11. Vitamin D-fortified milk (400 IU/quart) Cereals (40-50 IU/serving) Egg yolks Saltwater fish Liver Clinician’s Guide to the Prevention & Treatment of Osteoporosis National Osteoporosis Foundation, 2008 Chief Dietary Sources of Vitamin D
  • 12. Vitamin D: Recommended daily intake The Hormone Foundation 2009 Recommended daily intake Vitamin D Calcium Under age 50 400-800 IU at least 1,000 mg Over age 50 800-1,000 IU at least 1,200 mg
  • 13. • 10/11 RCTs: ↑ serum 25(OH)D • Response depends on baseline level ‣ Greater if baseline 25(OH)D <50 nmol/L • 0.7 nmol increase in serum 25(OH)D in healthy young men for each 1 ug (40 IU) of vitamin D Brannon et al, Am J Nutr 2008;88:483S-90S Response to Fortified Food
  • 14. + 100 IU oral vitamin D intake = + 1 ng/mL (2.5 nmol/L) serum 25(OH)D Rule of Thumb Patient with a starting serum 25(OH)D of 15 ng/mL would require 1,500 IU/d to bring his level to 30 ng/mL Heaney R. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2008;3:1535-41
  • 15. Individualize requirements for vitamin D supplementation Sunlight exposure Skin pigmentation Baseline vitamin D level Intestinal absorption rates Type of vit D supplement (D3 is 3x more potent than D2) Age (reduced photo- conversion of 7-dehydrocholesterol to vit D) Genetic variation in vitamin D receptor activity Brown S, Alternative Medicine Review 2008
  • 16. TOXICITY Vitamin D supplementation Trial characteristics 22 vitamin D trials with AE outcomes 19 trials: adults only Many too short to observe AEs 400-4,000 IU/d vit D3 (n=19) 5,000-10,000 IU/d vit D2 (n=2) Cranney et al, Am J Clin Nutri 2008;88(suppl):513S-9S Most frequently reported Hypercalcemia Hypercalciuria More events in vit D group but difference with placebo group NS Asymptomatic
  • 17. TOXICITY Vitamin D supplementation Trial characteristics 7 trials reported kidney stone incidence 5 trials had no cases 1 trial reported NS difference 1 reported increase in stones (WHI) Cranney et al, Am J Clin Nutri 2008;88(suppl):513S-9S Women’s Health Initiative n = 36,282 400 IU vitamin D3 + 1000 mg Ca vs Ca alone 5.7 events/10,000 women-years exposure
  • 18. Institute of Medicine Tolerable Upper Intake Level (TUIL) 2,000 IU/day No-observed-adverse- effect-level (NOAEL) 10,000 IU/day Heaney R. J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact 2006:6(4):334- Serum 25(OH)D 32 ng/mL = minimum daily intake of 2,600 IU vitamin D (US residents)
  • 19. 80-90% of vitamin D is cutaneously produced from sunlight Limited by age higher latitudes working indoors use of sunscreen skin pigmentation cultural practices precluding skin exposure
  • 20. Bathing suit exposure during summer until skin just begins to turn pink ⬇ skin production of 10,000 - 50,000 IU of vitamin D3 Adams et al. NEJM 1982;306:772-775
  • 21. Effect on serum 25(OH)D 4 RCTs using artificial UVB light source 4 RCTs using solar exposure Nursing home residents with low baseline 25(OH)D Suberythemal UV light exposure = 25(OH)D 28-42 nmol/L after 3 mos. Cranney et al, Am J Clin Nutri 2008;88(suppl):513S-9S
  • 22. “Fair evidence to suggest that artificial and solar exposure increases 25(OH)D levels in vitamin D- deficient and replete persons, including the elderly.” Brannon et al, Am J Nutr 2008;88:483S-90S
  • 23. TOXICITY Sun exposure “Is a specific level of sunlight exposure sufficient to maintain adequate vitamin D levels without increasing the risk of non-melanoma skin cancer or melanoma?” Cranney et al, Am J Clin Nutri 2008;88(suppl):513S-9S No studies!
  • 25. National Osteoporosis Foundation Measure serum 25(OH)D in those at risk of deficiency elderly malabsorption (i.e. celiac disease) chronic renal insufficiency housebound chronically ill limited sun exposure
  • 26. Low Vit D Status Despite Abundant Sun Exposure Binkley et al, JCEM 2008; 92;2130-5 Serum 25(OH)D and PTH Skin color: reflectance colorimetry Sun exposure index: amount of skin exposed X reported average sun exposure per week without sunscreen University of Hawaii A’ala Park Board Shop Convenience sample of adults in Honolulu, Hawaii (lat 21 ̊ ) n = 93 (63 ♂, 30♀) Mean self-reported sun exposure without sunscreen use 22.4 h (range 2-96) 28.9 + 1.5 h/wk
  • 27. Low Vit D Status Despite Abundant Sun Exposure Binkley et al, JCEM 2008; 92;2130-5 51% of subjects had low vit D status with serum 25(OH)D cutpoint of 30 ng/mL Evolutionary? Genetic differences: Optimal amount of vit D Cytochrome P450 Inadequate D3 Inadequate cutaneous production Enhanced cutaneous destruction of previt D3 or D3 Downregulation of cutaneous synthesis by sun-induced melanin production Abnormalities of transport from skin to circulation
  • 28. Low Vit D Status Despite Abundant Sun Exposure Sun exposure to the hands and face for 15 minutes may not be enough Measure serum 25(OH)D? Binkley et al, JCEM 2008; 92;2130-5
  • 29. Measure serum 25(OH)D in otherwise healthy women with osteoporosis? Tannenbaum et al, JCEM 2002:87;4431-7 Objective: Identify most useful/ cost-efficient screening tests in detecting secondary contributors to osteoporosis 24-h urine Ca for all If urine Ca abn, serum Ca and PTH Serum TSH for all on T4 replacement 1 2 3 4 5 24-h urine Ca & serum Ca for all If urine Ca or serum Ca abn, serum PTH Serum TSH for all on T4 replacement 24-h urine Ca, serum Ca & PTH for all Serum TSH for all on T4 replacement 24-h urine Ca, serum Ca, PTH and 25(OH)D for all Serum TSH for all on T4 replacement Serum Ca, PTH and 25(OH)D for all Serum TSH for all on T4 replacement n = 173 postmenopausal women, no known contributors to osteoporosis on past medical history
  • 30. Measure serum 25(OH)D in otherwise healthy women with osteoporosis? Tannenbaum et al, JCEM 2002:87;4431-7 Disorders identified: 56/173 women Hypercalciuria most common (9.8%; n=17) vitamin D deficiency (4.1%; n=7) 24-h urine Ca ➜ serum Ca & PTH Serum TSH for all on T4 replacement 1 2 3 4 5 24-h urine Ca & serum Ca ➜ PTH Serum TSH for all on T4 replacement 24-h urine Ca, serum Ca & PTH Serum TSH for all on T4 replacement 24-h urine Ca, serum Ca, PTH and 25(OH)D for all Serum TSH for all on T4 replacement Serum Ca, PTH and 25(OH)D for all Serum TSH for all on T4 replacement n = 173 postmenopausal women, no known contributors to osteoporosis on past medical history n=33 n=35 n=48 n=55 n=37
  • 31. Measure serum 25(OH)D in otherwise healthy women with osteoporosis? Tannenbaum et al, JCEM 2002:87;4431-7 24-h urine Ca ➜ serum Ca & PTH Serum TSH if indicated 1 2 24-h urine Ca & serum Ca ➜ PTH Serum TSH if indicated 24-h urine Ca, serum Ca & PTH Serum TSH if indicated 3 24-h urine Ca, serum Ca, PTH, 25(OH)D Serum TSH if indicated 4 Serum Ca, PTH, 25(OH)D Serum TSH if indicated 5 n=33 (59%) $22/patient $116 per diagnosis n=35 (63%) $30/patient $148 per diagnosis n=48 (86%) $75/patient $272 per diagnosis n=55 (98%) $116/patient $366 per diagnosis n=37 (66%) $108/patient $506 per diagnosis 1999: 24h urine Ca $8, serum Ca $7, PTH $57, serum 25(OH)D $41, TSH $23
  • 32. Vitamin D Deficiency: A Common Occurrence in Both High- and Low-energy Fractures Steele et al, HSSJ 2008:4;143-8 44 orthopedic trauma in-patients (20♂, 24♀) Low-energy fracture fracture from a fall of standing height High-energy fracture fracture from a fall greater than standing height or motor vehicle impact review analyzed 44 orthopedic trauma in-patients admitted from June 1, 2006 to February 1, 2007 for fracture care. The 44 patients comprised a consecutive series of patients seen by one physician on the metabolic bone disease team. As standard protocol, all patients admitted to the trauma service at this hospital were seen by both the orthopedic trauma service and the metabolic bone disease team. This standard of care was established based on an increased awareness of vitamin D deficiency and osteoporosis seen in orthopedic arthroplasty patients [7]. Patients were included if they sustained a documented fracture, had a 25-hydroxyvitamin D level drawn after surgery in the hospital, and were greater than or equal to 18 years of age. Patients were excluded if they had any known risk factors for vitamin D deficiency, such as renal insufficiency (as indicated by a creatinine level of ≥2 mg/dl), malabsorption, gastrectomy, active liver disease, acute myocardial infarction, alcoholism, anorexia nervosa, or steroid dependency. In this study, the 25(OH)D metabolite was used as a measurement of vitamin D status. Although calcitriol (1,25-dihydroxvitamin D) is the most potent vitamin D metabolite, the metabolite 25(OH)D provides a more accurate account of vitamin D status [9, 20, 26, 29]. Serum 25(OH)D levels were measured through the use of liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry. Age, gender, and type of fracture were recorded for each patient. This study included a total of 44 patients, 45.5% men (n=20) and 54.5% women (n=24). The mean age for all patients was 59±20 years, range 19–95 years. The mean age for men was younger at 51±21 years than for women, which was 66±17 years (p=0.02). The fractures were classed as low-energy fracture vs. high-energy fracture. Low-energy fractures were defined as fractures sustained from a fall of standing height or less, while high-energy fractures resulted from a fall greater than standing height or a motor vehicle impact. Univariate analysis was run on all variables; means, standard deviations, medians, frequencies, etc., as appropri- ate. All demographic and clinical variables were assessed ml (Fig. 1). The women in this series were more likely to be vitamin D insufficient than the men, (p=0.03). Seventy five percent (18/24) of women and 40% (8/20) of men were vitamin D insufficient. Specifically, this gender difference was seen within the high-energy fracture group in which significantly more women (80%, 8/10) than men (25%, 4/16) were vitamin D insufficient (p=0.01; Table 1a). There was a Median 33.5 Median 27.5 32 Mean 29.8 Mean 30.3 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 Men Women 25(OH)D [ng/ml] Fig. 1. Vitamin D levels in this patient population sorted by patient gender 26/44 (59%) vit D deficient 18/24 (75%) 8/20 (40%)
  • 33. Vitamin D Deficiency: A Common Occurrence in Both High- and Low-energy Fractures Steele et al, HSSJ 2008:4;143-8 y %, e - s, n s h % e s. e- el ) Table 2 Age and 25(OH)D level vs. fracture etiology Low-energy fractures High-energy fractures p value a. Men Agea 72.5±16 45.9±19 0.02c 25(OH)Db 19.5 34 0.007d b. Women Agea 71.1±14 57.8±18 0.053c 25(OH)Db 28 27 0.7d a Mean age in years ± standard deviation b Median 25(OH)D ng/ml c p values were calculated using the t test d p values were calculated using the Mann–Whitney test 145
  • 34. What cut-off value defines low vitamin D status? Serum 25(OH)D <25 nmol/L 25-75 nmol/L >75 nmol/L Deficiency Insufficiency Sufficiency Dawson-Hughes B, Am J Clin Nutr 2008:88(suppl);537S-40S Variability of vit D concentration by geographical location Differences in assay methodology Optimal level of 25(OH)D 30 ng/mL determined in a Caucasian population
  • 35. Goal of vit D supplementation? Serum 25(OH)D greater than an accepted cutpoint (e.g. 30 ng/ml) Upper limit of normal (a value that varies between laboratories) Binkley et al, JCEM 2008; 92;2130-5
  • 37. Objective To review the effect of vitamin D on bone density and fractures in postmenopausal women Data Source MEDLINE and EMBASE from 1966 to 1999 25 trials Study Selection Standard or hydroxylated vitamin D with or without Ca suppl vs control Measured bone density or fracture incidence >1 year Meta-analysis of the Efficacy of Vitamin D Treatment in Preventing Osteoporosis in Postmenopausal Women Guyatt et al, Endoc Rev 2002; 23(4);560-9
  • 38. Meta-analysis of the Efficacy of Vitamin D Treatment in Preventing Osteoporosis in Postmenopausal Women 25 trials Vitamin D (n=4017) vs control (n=4107) Patients with ↓bone density (17 trials) Standard vitamin D (10 trials) Hydroxylated vitamin D (14 trials) Both forms of vitamin D (1 trial) Follow-up: 1-5 y Loss to follow-up <10% (2 trials) 10-20% (8 trials) >20% (13 trials) unknown (2 trials) Blinded (18 trials) Unblinded (5 trials) Blinding unclear (2 trials) Guyatt et al, Endoc Rev 2002; 23(4);560-9
  • 39. Vitamin D Treatment in Preventing Osteoporosis in Postmenopausal Women RR with 95%CI for vertebral fractures FIG. 2. RR with 95% CI for vertebral fractures after treatment with vitamin D. . • Meta-Analyses of Osteoporosis Therapies Endocrine Reviews, August 2002, 23(4):560–5 Guyatt et al, Endoc Rev 2002; 23(4);560-9
  • 40. Vitamin D Treatment in Preventing Osteoporosis in Postmenopausal Women RR with 95%CI for nonvertebral fractures sites hydroxylated trials patients RR (95% CI) value valu Combined 8 1130 0.63 (0.45, 0.88) !0.01 0.16 Standard 1 160 0.33 (0.01, 8.05) 0.49 – Hydroxylated 7 970 0.64 (0.44, 0.92) 0.02 0.11 rtebral Combined 6 6187 0.77 (0.57, 1.04) 0.09 0.09 Standard 3 5399 0.78 (0.55, 1.09) 0.15 0.05 Hydroxylated 3 788 0.87 (0.29, 2.59) 0.80 0.19 eted P ! 0.05 as indicating important between-study differences in results. FIG. 3. RR with 95% CI for nonvertebral fractures after treatment with vitamin D. Guyatt et al, Endoc Rev 2002; 23(4);560-9
  • 41. Proposed Scientific and Ethical Guidelines for Clinical Trials on Vitamin D and Fracture Osteoporosis Education Project Vitamin D levels achieved should be 32 ng/mL Achievement of vit D sufficiency should be verified by 25(OH)D Only those with 25(OH)D >32 ng/ mL should be included Vit D supplementation must be continued for at least 12 mos Vit D3 (cholecalciferol) should be used 1 2 3 4 5 Brown S, Alternative Medicine Review 2008
  • 42. Trial Trial Overview (All RCTs) Trial Compliance Serum Vit D (Therapeutic threshold is 32 ng/mL) % Fracture Reduction French Decalyos I Study 3270 ambulatory elderly French women 18-month trial 800 IU D3 w/ tri- calcium phosphate (1,200 mg elemental Ca) 1,762 (54%) completed the trial Good supplement compliance 16 ng/mL average Vit D level at baseline 42 ng/mL average vit D level at completion of trial 32% ↓ in all non-vertebral fractures 43% ↓ in hip fractures French Decalyos I Study Extension 3270 ambulatory elderly French women 18-month extension of trial 800 IU D3 w/ tri- calcium phosphate (1,200 mg elemental Ca) Supplement compliance unclear but appears adequate 16 ng/mL average Vit D level at baseline 42 ng/mL average vit D level at completion of trial 24% ↓ in all non-vertebral fractures 29% ↓ in hip fractures Vitamin D and Fracture Trials Brown S, Alternative Medicine Review 2008
  • 43. Trial Trial Overview (All RCTs) Trial Compliance Serum Vit D (Therapeutic threshold is 32 ng/mL) % Fracture Reduction French Decalyos II Study 610 ambulatory French women 2-year trial 800 IU of D3 with tri-calcium phosphate (1,200 mg elemental Ca) 422 (69%) completed the trial 95% supplement compliance 9 ng/mL average Vit D level at baseline 30 ng/mL average vit D level at completion of trial Non-significant ↓ in all non- vertebral fractures 31-38% ↓ in hip fractures British study of vit D and osteoporotic fracture 2,686 community living men and women aged 65-85 5-year trial 100,000 IU tablets of vit D3 every 4 months 75% of participants took the vit D at least 80% of the time 66% compliance for final dose At 4 years 29 ng/mL average Vit D level in those on supplements 21 ng/mL average vit D in placebo group 33% overall ↓ of fractures (hip, wriat, spine, forearm) Vitamin D and Fracture Trials Brown S, Alternative Medicine Review 2008
  • 44. Trial Trial Overview (All RCTs) Trial Compliance Serum Vit D (Therapeutic threshold is 32 ng/mL) % Fracture Reduction Boston area study 389 community dwelling men & women (mean age 74) 3-year trial Intervention: 700 IU D3 and 500 mg elemental Ca (as citrate maleate) 318 (82%) completed the trial Supplement compliance appears good 30 ng/mL average Vit D level at baseline 44 ng/mL average vit D level at completion of trial 60% ↓ in all non- vertebral fractures 60% ↓ in hip fractures Japanese study of sunlight exposure on BMD & hip fracture incidence among vit D deficient stroke patients 258 stroke patients 12-month trial 50% of patients had 15 minutes/day of sunlight exposure to face and hands 50% were sunlight deprived Compliance with sunlight exposure appears good 6.8 ng/mL average Vit D level at baseline 20.8 ng/mL average vit D level at completion of trial Sixfold ↓ in hip fracture incidence in the sunlight- exposed group 3.1%↑ in BMD in sunlight-exposed 3.3% ↓ in BMD in sunlight-deprived Vitamin D and Fracture Trials Brown S, Alternative Medicine Review 2008
  • 45. Trial Trial Overview (All RCTs) Trial Compliance Serum Vit D (Therapeutic threshold is 32 ng/mL) % Fracture Reduction Japanese study of hip fracture reduction among Alzheimer’s patients through sunlight exposure 284 Alzheimer’s patients 12-month trial 1,200 mg elemental calcium 2x/day to both groups; 50% of patients had 15 min/day of sunlight exposure to face, hands and forearms (total exposed skin area 426 +32 cm3); 50% of patients were sunlight deprived Compliance with sunlight exposure appears good 9.6 ng/mL average Vit D level at baseline 20.8 ng/mL average vit D level at completion of trial 4x more frequent non-vertebral fractures in sunlight-deprived group (11 vs 3) 4x more frequent hip fractures in sunlight deprived- group (9 vs 2) 2.7% ↑ in BMD in sunlight-exposed 5.6% ↓ in BMD in sunlight-deprived Vitamin D and Fracture Trials Brown S, Alternative Medicine Review 2008
  • 46. Vitamin D and Fracture Trials Some observations Brown S, Alternative Medicine Review 2008 Supplementation with 400 IU vitamin D repeatedly found to have no impact on fracture incidence Bischoff-Ferrari et al meta-analysis Pooling of 12 studies with 400 IU vitamin D daily failed to influence fracture incidence 700-800 IU daily of vitamin D ↓ hip fracture by 26% ↓ all fractures by 23%
  • 47. Vitamin D and Fracture Trials Some observations Brown S, Alternative Medicine Review 2008 Vitamin D at an 800 IU daily dose leads to 25(OH)D levels of 32 ng/mL in some but not all subjects Less than half of adults will achieve 25(OH)D of 32 ng/mL with 700-1,000 IU vitamin D supplementation x 8 weeks British RECORD trial 800 IU vitamin D in older adults raised vit D to an average of 24.8 ng/mL Swiss study Vit D levels increased from 12.3 ng/mL to 26.2 ng/mL in ambulatory elderly given 800 IU D3 daily x 3 months
  • 48. Vitamin D Status and Treatment of Postmenopausal Osteoporosis with Bisphosphonates 25 (OH) D : 93 [3.3] nmol/L 25 (OH) D : 50 [1.9] nmol/L # 112 women On bisphosphonate Etidronate (n=30) Alendronate (n=64) Risedronate (n=38) Serum 25(OH)D <70 nmol/L (53%) Deane et al, Alternative BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 2007
  • 49. Objective To evaluate how supplementation with vit D alone affects risk of falling, primarily in postmenopausal women Data Source MEDLINE, EMBASE, BIOSIS and Cochrane database from Jan 1985 to June 2005 5 studies Study Selection Vitamin D vs placebo Vit D + Ca vs calcium alone Studies which enrolled both men and women included Risk of falls Meta-analysis: Vitamin D and the Risk of Falls Jackson et al, QJM 2007;100:185-192
  • 50. 5 trials All RCTs except 1 D3 used in all D3 + Ca (4 trials) Postmenopausal women only (3 trials) Mean baseline 25(OH)D were inadequate (defined as <76.2 nmol/L) Duration 18 weeks to over 5 years D3 dose from 300 to 800 IU except 1 trial (oral capsule of 100,000 IU vit D3 q4 months) Meta-analysis: Vitamin D and the Risk of Falls Jackson et al, QJM 2007;100:185-192
  • 51. Meta-analysis: Vitamin D and the Risk of Falls Review: Vitamin D3 review Comparison: 01 Falls Outcome: 01 Falls including calcium Study Vitamin D3 (+/− Ca) Control RR (fixed) Weight RR (fixed) or sub-category n/N n/N 95% CI % 95% CI Graafmans 62/177 66/177 16.82 0.94 [0.71, 1.24] Pfeifer 11/70 19/67 4.95 0.55 [0.29, 1.08] Bischoff 14/62 18/60 4.66 0.75 [0.41, 1.37] Trivedi 100/270 92/255 24.11 1.03 [0.82, 1.29] Grant 161/1306 196/1332 49.46 0.84 [0.69, 1.02] Total (95% CI) 1885 1891 100.00 0.88 [0.78, 1.00] Total events: 348 (Vitamin D3 (+/− Ca)), 391 (Control) Test for heterogeneity: Chi² = 4.36, df = 4 (P = 0.36), I² = 8.3% Test for overall effect: Z = 1.95 (P = 0.05) 0.1 0.2 0.5 1 2 5 10 Favours treatment Favours control igure 1. Results of the meta-analysis for falls. Review: Vitamin D3 review Comparison: 01 Falls Outcome: 02 Falls including calcium in post-menopausal women Study Vitamin D3 (+/− Ca) Control RR (fixed) Weight RR (fixed) or sub-category n/N n/N 95% CI % 95% CI Pfeifer 11/70 19/67 14.67 0.55 [0.29, 1.08] Bischoff 14/62 18/60 13.82 0.75 [0.41, 1.37] Trivedi 100/270 92/255 71.50 1.03 [0.82, 1.29] Total (95% CI) 402 382 100.00 0.92 [0.75, 1.12] Total events: 125 (Vitamin D3 (+/− Ca)), 129 (Control) , measured; N, not measured; a RR reported in forest plots. b Median value (mean reported unless otherwise stated) umber of subjects in both groups. Pooled RR for D3 preventing falls 0.88 (95%CI 0.78-1.00) Postmenopausal women only Pooled RR 0.81 (95%CI 0.48-1.34) Jackson et al, QJM 2007;100:185-192
  • 52. Vitamin D and the Risk of Falls Randomized controlled trials Trial Vit D dose/ preparation ug (IU)/d Duration of trial 25(OH)D level achieved nmol/L Outcome Muscle performance Sato Pfeiffer Bischoff 25(1000) D2 20 (800) D3 20 (800) D3 3 y 2 mo 3 mo 84 66 66 + + + Falls Bischoff Broe Flicker Grant 17.5 (700) D3 20 (800) D2 20 (800) D2 20 (800) D3 3 y 5 mo 2 y 5 y 99 75 NA 62 + + + Null Dawson-Hughes, Am J Clin Nutr 2008;88(suppl):573S-40S
  • 53. Vitamin D and Risk of Falls Some observations Trials assessing impact of vit D on falling more likely to have positive results when conducted in institutions Presence of nursing staff More accurate ascertainment of falls Higher supplement compliance Dawson-Hughes, Am J Clin Nutr 2008;88(suppl):573S-40S
  • 54. Vitamin D and Risk of Falls Some observations Research has not identified the minimum 25(OH)D level for maximal benefit in fall prevention Trials indicate mean values of 75 nmol/L and 99 nmol/L ? higher values might confer benefit Dawson-Hughes, Am J Clin Nutr 2008;88(suppl):573S-40S
  • 55. Should vitamin D levels be measured? How much vitamin D is enough? Does supplemental vitamin D reduce fractures and falls?