Harvard Law School - Russian Innovation Ecosystem. Past, Present, Future
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×
 

Harvard Law School - Russian Innovation Ecosystem. Past, Present, Future

on

  • 410 views

 

Statistics

Views

Total Views
410
Slideshare-icon Views on SlideShare
404
Embed Views
6

Actions

Likes
0
Downloads
0
Comments
0

2 Embeds 6

http://www.linkedin.com 4
https://www.linkedin.com 2

Accessibility

Categories

Upload Details

Uploaded via as Microsoft PowerPoint

Usage Rights

© All Rights Reserved

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Processing…
Post Comment
Edit your comment

    Harvard Law School - Russian Innovation Ecosystem. Past, Present, Future Harvard Law School - Russian Innovation Ecosystem. Past, Present, Future Presentation Transcript

    • Russia: land of wonders or “black hole”? Overview of the national innovation ecosystem Ilya Ponomarev, Chairman, Innovations and VC Subcommittee, State Duma Harvard Law School 11/11/2013
    • History of Russia’s innovation ecosystem • At the foundation – Russian Academy of Sciences, est. 1724 by Peter I “The Great” – Internationally oriented from the very beginning, primarily Holland, Sweden, France, Prussia – Universities had never been influential: • focused on education • major research done within RAS or privately sponsored • XIX-XX century – competition in innovation with the West – – – – – Railway system Industrial innovations Radio and TV Aviation,Space and rocket science Military research • XIX cent. – privately (or personally) driven • XX cent. – driven by government Ilya Ponomarev, State Duma, 11/11/2013
    • Russian Academy of Sciences • • • • • • • Consists of several hundred research institutes Divided into 11 vertical divisions (physics, chemistry, math, earth, …) and has 3 regional branches (Urals, Siberia, Far East) Two major “sister” Academies – Medical and Agriculture, currently merging into one Self-governed, organized as an elite club of academicians, and candidate academicians Determines directions of fundamental research and appropriates funds allocated by the state General subcontractor for R&D for the state, very limited contracts with industries Scientists employed in parallel by research institutes and universities – Ilya Ponomarev, State Duma, 11/11/2013 Full integration between education and research exists only in some “science cities” – isolated problem-oriented R&D clusters, usually with certain military emphasis
    • R&D and commercialization chain in USSR • Academy of Sciences – state-guided fundamental research – – • All major state agencies (vertically structured) had their own applied research institutes – – – • • Served their industries Procured fundamental research from the Academy Adapted fundamental results to the requests of the particular industries Agencies were responsible for technological progress within the industries – • Divided into civilian and military research fields, latter more prestigious and better funded In certain cases military researchers could request intelligence data Ministry of Defense reported separatedly to Politbureau of CPSU, and provided technology foresights “Construction bureaus” at particular enterprises were implementing centrally provided technologies and were responsible for inventions System of “specialists distribution” for universities graduates Ilya Ponomarev, State Duma, 11/11/2013
    • Impact of reforms of 1990s System imploded: • Funding dramatically dropped, Russian Academy of Sciences experienced unprecedented brain drain – • • • • • • • Especially centrally based institutes The more prestigious particular institution was before, the less attractive it became after Government became horizontally organized, industries-oriented agencies vanished Industrial research institutes were gradually disbanded or taken over by particular enterprises No military procurement at all Industrial collapse in all industries except oil, gas, mining and metals Constant redistribution of assets within major corporations shortened planning horizon and made uneconomical to invest into R&D Russian technologies could not impact valuation of companies like Western could Ilya Ponomarev, State Duma, 11/11/2013
    • Russia’s innovators key competences • IT – – – – – • • • • Mobile apps E-payment systems E-learning Financial systems Social and media apps Telecom New materials Industrial innovations Geosciences • Emerging – clean tech • Underdeveloped: – E-commerce – Life sciences Ilya Ponomarev, State Duma, 11/11/2013
    • Pres. Medvedev’s call for modernization • Medvedev’s “4i” initiative in 2008 – – – – • Infrastructure Institutes Investment Innovation Presidential address to the parliament in 2009 was focused on innovation – Most fashionable discussion topic – Now everybody is on twitter, facebook, blogs, … • Pres. Obama “reset” policy, also started in 2009, assumes that US and Russia are building common values – Creating a compatible innovation ecosystem is a perfect example • 2009-2011 were years of multiple initiatives in Russia • After Putin’s return – obvious recess, but most initiatives are already launched Ilya Ponomarev, State Duma, 11/11/2013
    • Priority #1. Financial resources • Government created numerous financial institutions – – – – • Many large businessmen are thinking about investing in hi-tech – • DST owns 10% of Facebook, recently made Mail.ru IPO Some VCs are formed, many with foreign capital – Ilya Ponomarev, State Duma, 11/11/2013 Equity financing • Rusnano – $10b investment company • Russian Venture Corp – $1b fund of funds • Rosinfocominvest – $150m PE fund • Bortnik Fund – seed and pre-seed grants Debt financing • Vnesheconombank Infrastructure support • Hi-tech parks • Special economic zones • Skolkovo Foundation as an entry point Tax vacations: • Special tax regime for hi-tech companies • No capital gains tax for investments over 5 years Most successful Russian search engine Yandex.ru was started with Massachusetts money
    • Problems with funding still exist • Limited exits within the country • Lack of internal demand – Foreign technologies still usually preferred over Russian – Government is yet to come • Deficit of physical infrastructure – Inexpensive offices – Business services – Quality housing • Insufficient number of experienced investors Ilya Ponomarev, State Duma, 11/11/2013
    • Priority #2. Legislation • Significant progress has been made during recent decade – – – – – – – • Corporate law, introduction of LLP/LLC Securities law State procurement E-Commerce IP regulation is copied from German IP law Tech transfer law (similar to Bayh-Dole Act) … Skolkovo Law unveils possibility to solve many issues “manually” – Taxation – Immigration – Construction permits • Controversial Academy of Sciences reform – RAS is stripped of appropriation and management function – Funding focus shifted to universities Ilya Ponomarev, State Duma, 11/11/2013
    • Real problems with legislation • Law enforcement • Some Russian laws are incompatible with usual approach legal acts: – Corporate legislation – options, stock series – Technology transfer act – bureaucratic • In some Acts bad wording leaves room for unfavorable misinterpretation – Software VAT exemption act – Privacy protection act • Main points of immediate attention – Internet crime liability definition – Bankruptcy regulations – Miscellaneous industry-specific acts (telecom, advertisement, mass-media, …) Ilya Ponomarev, State Duma, 11/11/2013
    • Priority #3: Entrepreneurship and VC • ~920+ mln. USD invested (201 deals) in 2012, 5th largest VC market in the world – ~790 mln. in IT (168 deals), ~100 in industrial technologies (incl. cleantech), ~10 – life sciences – 37 mln. seed, 100 mln. series A, 255 mln. B, 517 mln. C+. – Tendency to shift towards later stages – 5 mln. - average deal • 12 exits, ~370 mln. USD, incl. $100 mln. in 3 large deals • During last 3 years – several major IPOs (incl. Yandex and Mail.ru), most major telecom and IT players are public (usually NASDAQ, NYSE and LSE) • Most investors are either former PE people, or former entrepreneurs Ilya Ponomarev, State Duma, 11/11/2013
    • Situation with investment targets • Huge Soviet legacy of technological ideas – Primarily in places like Novosibirsk Akademgorodok • Insufficient knowledge and experience in protecting IP • High desire of researchers and their students to get involved in commercial activities, but – Lack of experience – Unadequate self valuation – Limited knowledge how to follow the market and find niches • Strong deficit of smart money Ilya Ponomarev, State Duma, 11/11/2013
    • Main problem of Russia’s innovation ecosystem – human resources • No entrepreneurs, even less – experienced serial entrepreneurs – – • Lack of international business experience and proper connections – – • Education, research and industry are disconnected Heavy impact of brain drain Demographic crisis of 1990s starts to hit No adequate business schools, professors with first-hand experience Negative legacy – – – Ilya Ponomarev, State Duma, 11/11/2013 No success stories to follow Language barrier Education reform is controversial – – – – • High entrepreneurial potential of Russians is focused on avoiding government regulations Russians are willingly taking economic risks, but current institutions punish such behavior Decreased level of people’s geographical mobility Excessive concentration of business activity in Moscow, colonial policies towards other regions Housing and utilities deterioration
    • Skolkovo project 1. To develop Russian innovation ecosystem by creating a universal entry point to – Make Russian businesses global – Attract international businesses to start R&D and hi-tech manufacturing 2. Create in Russia new companies and/or their divisions, to develop new hi-tech services and products 3. Develop Russia’s human resources: attract foreign specialists and support local talents in hi-tech Ilya Ponomarev, State Duma, 11/11/2013
    • Skolkovo’s key principles • Project is managed by a non-for-profit Skolkovo Foundation, governed by a special law • Project participants receive set of business services as well as certain incentives for companies with revenues up to 3 bln. Rbl. (USD $100 mln.): – 0% profit tax, VAT, property tax – 14% (vs. usual 35%) social payments – 0% custom duties • Each department is supposed to grow into selfsustainable operation – – – – – Education Research Commercialization, tech transfer and business development Investment Real estate • Each service is to be provided on competitive basis • Business model is developed as a private-public partnership, but assumes separation of public and private funds. After a while Skolkovo Foundation should become independent of state funding • At heart of the project – SkTech – “Russian MIT” Ilya Ponomarev, State Duma, 11/11/2013
    • US-Russia cooperation to develop innovation ecosystem • • • • In 2009, contacts between Russian and MA organizations, incl. MIT, began to outline practical cooperation. Rusnano develops close cooperation with MIT for training and discusses joint projects Jan. 2010 Russian Government delegation, led by First Vice Prime Minister visits MIT. Decision to initiate Skolkovo Project has been made Feb. 2010 US State Dept. takes “RusTechDel” delegation made of 10 West Coast CEO’s (incl. eBay, CISCO, twitter, …) to Moscow and Novosibirsk March 2010 - another Russian delegation in Cambridge/Boston – Cooperation agreement signed with Novosibirsk hi-tech park – Russian sponsorship for MassChallenge.org business plan competition – Negotiations begun with MIT to become a co-founder of Skolkovo Project • • • • April 2010 – Massachusetts Senate invites Pres. Medvedev to come to MA May 2010, Delegation of 20 prominent venture capitalists to Moscow (VC Trip), supported by State Dept. No participation from MA. June 2010, Skolkovo Board of Directors announced - 6 Russians, 6 foreigners, incl. 3 Americans – all from West Coast. June 2010, Pres. Medvedev visits Silicon Valley, not MA. – Several high-profile agreements were signed – President ordered to open Skolkovo project office in Bay Area – Agreement with MIT signed in US Chamber of Commerce “lobby,” not main hall, and only after enormous pressure from Russian side • September 2010 – NYAS delivers report “Yaroslavl Roadmap 10-15-20” • 2011 – Skolkovo Institute of Technology established together with MIT Ilya Ponomarev, State Duma, 11/11/2013
    • Why cooperate and • Russia’s 5 technological priorities match Why now? MA core competences: – – – – – Biotech and life sciences Cleantech - new energy sources IT and supercomputing Space and telecom Nuclear technologies • Russia can become resource for manufacturing facilities, R&D personnel, scientific advances to be commercialized, clinical trials – MA can host Russian corp. offices, tech holding companies, provide training to entrepreneurs and financing of new companies. • Russia’s domestic market, especially for new energy and biotech projects with underlying layer in nanotechnologies, is very promising • Right now major Russian businessmen are looking to form joint ventures to invest into hi-tech, and actively touring West – primarily Silicon Valley