Tackling Hunger in India
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5

Tackling Hunger in India






Total Views
Views on SlideShare
Embed Views



2 Embeds 95

http://pressroom.ipc-undp.org 91
http://pinterest.com 4



Upload Details

Uploaded via as Microsoft PowerPoint

Usage Rights

© All Rights Reserved

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
Post Comment
Edit your comment

Tackling Hunger in India Tackling Hunger in India Presentation Transcript

  • Tackling Hunger in India: Prospects and Challenges Biraj Patnaik Principal Adviser Office of the Commissioners to the Supreme Court (Right to Food Case) www.sccommissioners.org
  • Hunger Map IFPRI 2009
  • Underweight Children: A Severe Problem in South Asia
  • NFHS The underweight prevalence (children under age 5) varied from 60% in Madhya Pradesh to 20 % in Mizoram
  • Progress in reducing child malnutrition has been uneven
    • Improvements in 16 states
    • Largest improvements:
    • 2005-06 1998-99 % diff.
    • Orissa 44.0 54.4 10.4
    • Maharashtra 39.7 49.6 9.9
    • Chhattisgarh 52.1 60.8 8.7
    • HP 36.2 43.6 7.4
    • Rajasthan 44.0 50.6 6.6
  • Situation worsens in 13 states
    • 2005-06 1998-99 % diff.
    • Assam 40.4 36.0 -4.4
    • Jharkhand 59.2 54.3 -4.9
    • MP 60.3 53.5 -6.8
    • Haryana 41.9 34.6 -7.3
    Also in Bihar, Gujarat and Kerala
    • Food availability
    • Nutrient in-take
    • Seasonality of food and water
    • Nutrition and health education
    • Absence of community workers/ANMs/Nurses
    • Non-access to cheap medicines
    • Diarrhoea, dysentery, fever, malaria
    • Non-availability of health services-SHC/PHC/CHC
    • Immunization / ANC / PNC/ emergency care
    • Low institutional delivery
    • Low Birth Weight Babies
    • Early marriage and pregnancy
    • Non-spacing/anaemia among women
    • Weak public health measures
    • Malaria, Water
    • Infections, Diseases
    • Sanitation
    • Cultural practices
    • Breast feeding
    • Food consumption during pregnancy
    • Unsafe and unclean deliveries
    Why high Malnutrition
    • India has the highest underweight children among the BRIC and SAARC countries
    • Reasons: Inadequate access to food+ Lack of education of mother + Poor sanitation + Unsafe drinking water
    • Underweight children
    Nutrition: Very high percentage of underweight children - Even compared to SAARC countries (HDR 2011)
    • Among industrial states, Gujarat has a high incidence of malnutrition among SC and ST women .
    • In spite of high economic growth Gujarat fares the worst in terms of overall hunger index among high per-capita income states.
    • It ranked 13 out of 17 major states in hunger index, below Orissa, UP, WB, and Assam etc.
    Economic Growth versus Malnutrition Reduction (HDR 2011)
  • Open defecation - serious threat to health & nutritional status (HDR 2011)
    • Improvement in households with access to sanitation facilities from 40 % in 2002 to 51 % in 2008-9
      • Large inter state variations
        • Less than 2% hhs in Delhi lacked access to toilet facility compared to 79% in Orissa
  • Legal Action on the Right to Food
    • Initiated in 2001 following a PIL filed in the Supreme Court by People’s Union for Civil Liberties (PUCL) asking for the Right to Food to be made a fundamental right.
    • The case has emerged as the longest continuing mandamus in the world on the Right to Food.
    • So far, more than 70 interim orders have been passed in this case .
  • Outcomes so far
    • Mainstreamed discourse on the Right to Food in India
    • Principle of universal entitlements established with the universalisation of the Mid Day Meal and ICDS programmes
    • Conditions created for enactment of the National Rural Employment Guarantee Act
    • Supreme Court orders help to convert 9 food and employment schemes into legal entitlements that are justiciable
    • Supreme Court orders result in massive increases in budget allocations for all the nine schemes
  • Distinctive features
    • Special focus on creating specific entitlements for marginalised groups such as the urban homeless, single women and persons with disabilities by.
    • Supreme Court sets up The Supreme Court Commissioners office as an independent oversight body, outside of Government
    • Supreme Court orders result in massive increases in budget allocations for all the nine schemes
  • The National Food Security Act
  • Imperatives for legislating the Right to Food
    • Moral Imperative
    • (High growth and yet hunger and malnutrition persist alongside poor social indicators)
    • Political Imperative
    • ( Legislature vs.Judiciary )
    • “ Electoral” imperative
    • ( Anti-incumbency in the context of the 2009 General and State Elections )
  • Key elements proposed by Civil Society as the framework for the NFSA?
    • Offer legislative sanction to legal entitlements
    • Strengthen existing programmes.
    • Create new sets of entitlements for very marginalised groups and vulnerable communities.
    • Establish independent monitoring institutions empowered to redress grievances effectively (including punitive legal action)
    • Strengthen the “protect” and “respect” elements of the Right to Food including protection of livelihoods and production issues.
  • Issues and Challenges
    • 1. Universal or targeted?
      • Should the Act be applicable only to BPL families as currently envisaged?
    • Food or Food plus?
      • Vision of the Food Ministry about the Act is restricted to provisioning of 25 kgs of food grains at Rs.3 per kg ONLY for BPL families
      • Government does not recognize nutrition as a capability contingent on factors other than just provisioning of subsidised food .
      • Food alone is not sufficient; need more things to be in place
    • Is it affordable?
      • What are the financial implications?
      • How will the entitlement be financed?
    • Will it see the light of day?
      • No ownership by key institutions including the PMO and the Planning Commission.
      • Lack of consensus within civil society.
      • Unlikely to attain convergence of schemes operated by five Ministries
  • Thank you