Legacy of Sports events presentation

Uploaded on


  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Be the first to comment
No Downloads


Total Views
On Slideshare
From Embeds
Number of Embeds



Embeds 0

No embeds

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

    No notes for slide


  • 1. Legacy of Mega Sports Events: What May Be The Legacy In Brazil from Hosting two Mega Sports Events? Sofia Sunden Research Assistant / Internship Programme Brasília, 10 th February 2012
  • 2. What May be the Legacy in Brazil from Hosting two Mega Sports Events?
    • Brazil has performed relatively well throughout the economic crisis, recovering fast from it.
    • Brazil is one of the few countries managing to combine economic growth with the reduction of absolute poverty and inequality .
    • Mega Sport Events are commonly believed to boost economic growth and enhance political reputation.
    • Will hosting two mega sports events establish Brazil as an economically and politically leading country – or is there a risk that the opposite scenario occurs?
  • 3. Brazil’s Current Economic Situation
    • Despite the crisis, Brazil’s economy has performed relatively well
      • • Annual GDP growth rate of 7.5 % percent in 2010
      • … while reducing poverty and inequality:
      • • 12 million lifted out of absolute poverty – from 11% to 3.8% (2001-2007)
      • • Income inequality (Gini) fell 8%, to 0.47 (2001-2009) – still high, though
      • Important contributors to poverty and inequality reduction:
      • • Bolsa Família (conditional cash transfer programme )
      • • New national minimum pay policy
  • 4. Increasing Inequality Worldwide
      • Income inequality has increased worldwide since the 1980’s (Wade 2011).
      • Income inequality can have a number of negative social impacts:
      • • Increased crime rates
      • • Reduced overall health
      • • Social unrest
      • (Oxfam 2012)
      • Therefore, to reduce income inequality should be a policy concern.
      • Such concern must be integral to the planning and implementation of the preparations for mega sports events.
  • 5. Legacy of Mega Sports Events , a contested concept
        • “ The underlying idea of a legacy creation is that it represents something of substance that will enhance the long-term well-being or lifestyle of destination residents in a very substantial manner—preferably in a way that reflects the values of the local population” (Ritchie 2000 p. 156).
        • Governments, media and lobby groups often refer to a positive legacy to get public approval and provide justification for redistributing funds.
        • Difficult to measure; effect on local public as well as visitors.
  • 6. Motivation to Organize Mega Sports Events
    • Motivations for countries wishing to host mega sports events commonly include the beliefs that it will boost economic growth, enhance political reputation and leave a long lasting positive legacy.
    • Motivations:
    • It is good ‘marketing’ for the country;
    • attract foreign investors;
    • increase tourism;
    • enhance the country’s international profile;
    • create investment in infrastructure -> boosting economic activity.
    • On the other hand, huge public investments are necessary.
  • 7. The Idea of a Positive Legacy
    • A Positive Legacy was seen in Barcelona’s Olympic Games, 1992
      • Urban development, innovative design and increased reputation
    • Is it an appropriate example to be used as a blue-print?
      • Urban developments were already in place in Barcelona for a decade prior to the events (Rolnik ,2011)
  • 8.
    • Mega Sport Events have also generated Negative Legacies:
    • Greece, Athens Olympic Games, 2000: economic losses and massive debts.
    • China, Beijing Olympic Games, 2008: relocation and forced evicted people.
    • South Africa, World Cup, 2010: forced evictions of people upon removal of slum areas; did not generate the forecasted surplus.
    • (Rolnik, 2011)
    A number of Negative Legacies
  • 9. Legacy in BRICS Countries?
    • BRICS countries have recently hosted (or are planning to host) a number of mega sport events.
    • Developed vs. BRICS countries as organizers of Mega Sport Events
      • Different economic and social costs?
        • Germany and France were able to refurbish already existing stadiums & no known legacy of forced evictions.
      • Is there more at stake for BRICS countries and more to gain for these countries in terms of increased political reputation?
        • The notion of ‘beautification’ and clearance of slum-areas for example.
      • Can the BRICS countries, which have a high level of absolute poverty, justify the spending for a Mega Sports Event?
  • 10. What May Be The Legacy in Brazil?
    • Some very optimistic forecasts (Ernst and Young, 2010) :
    • “ The positive effects of hosting one of the world’s major sports events may last forever and multiply, as we will see.”
    • Tourism may increase up to 79%.
    • “ In total, an additional R$ 142.39 billion will flow in the country from 2010 to 2014, generating 3.63 million jobs/year and R$ 63.48 billion of income for the population.”
    • “ After going through some stages and achieving solid macroeconomic core principles, the country approaches its desired status of being the world’s fifth largest economy in the very near future.”
  • 11. Ex-ante vs. ex-post
    • Estimations of impacts on economic growth, job creation and increased tourism are difficult to make.
    • To consider:
    • Is Brazil different from other countries where these events generated losses?
    • Is it possible to repeat the success witnessed in Barcelona ’92?
  • 12. Best case scenario
    • Best case scenario:
    • Improved infrastructure in a number of cities – including enhanced public transportation systems;
    • Creation of jobs – especially related to tourism and construction;
    • “ Pacifications” of a number of favelas in Rio de Janeiro which a) will curb drug trafficking and b) could provide improved social infrastructure;
    • Increased tourism to Brazil;
    • Enhanced reputation as a world leading country.
  • 13. Worst case scenario
    • A few risks:
    • Economic losses:
    • The government has assured to cover any funding issues the Organizing Committee may face.
    • Decreased social conditions or homelessness for those forced evicted.
    • Human rights violations
      • May be permitted by federal and state governments if and when allowing forced evictions in order to make space for the construction of arenas and the beautification of the cities.
  • 14. Final Thoughts
    • To Consider and Discuss:
    • Will hosting these mega sport events result in economic gains or losses?
    • Can these events generate a positive legacy among the public?
    • Will these events strengthen Brazil’s position economically and politically?
    • And finally: Is It Worth It?
  • 15. REFERENCE LIST Ernst and Young (2010) Sustainable Brazil Social and Economic Impacts of the 2014 World Cup © 2010 EYGM Limited. ( The study made in association with the Fundação Getúlio Vargas.) Newton, Caroline (2009) The Reverse Side of the Medal: About the 2010 FIFA World Cup and the Beautification of the N2 in Cape Town, Urban Forum Ritchie, J (2000) Turning 16 days into 16 years through Olympic legacies . Event Management Rolnik, Raquel (2011) Interview: “World Cup and Olympics: The Show and the Myth” published by Rio on Watch at http:// rioonwatch.org/?s =Raquel - originally published in Portuguese at http://pagina22.com.br/index.php/2011/08/o-espetaculo-do-mito/ “ O espetáculo e o mito ” - Revista Pagina 22 Oxfam (2012) Oxfam Briefing Paper Left behind by the G20? How inequality and environmental degradation threaten to exclude poor people from the benefits of economic growth . Oxfam GB Wade, R, H (2011) Income Inequality: Should We Worry About Global Trends? European Journal of Development Research . References
  • 16. The end
    • Thank you for listening
    • Sofia Sunden: fia_sund@hotmail.com