Primer: Virtual Desktop Delivery-
     Desktop and Application
    One Size Does Not Fit All
           Virtualization
   ...
Barb Goldworm
• President & chief analyst, FOCUS (www.focusonsystems.com), an analyst
  firm focused on systems, storage &...
Virtualization Adoption
                                                                                                  ...
Top 3 Priorities for Next Virtualization Efforts
                Expand server virt. to > servers and apps
               ...
Defining Desktop and
                         Application Virtualization
• Desktops
         – Server Hosted
             ...
XenApp/Terminal Services Sessions
                                    Virtual Desktop Infrastructure                      ...
Business Drivers -- IT issues
• Desktop and application support/management has plagued IT since
  corporate adoption of PC...
Business Drivers:
                                        Changing User Needs
• Increase in remote user scenarios
        ...
Technical Drivers
•     Server virtualization adoption (products, people, process)
•     Server, network improvements - re...
Windows 7 Migration
• Most companies skipped Vista
• XP support ending
• Win 7 requires more memory and faster
  processor...
Why (Re-)Evaluate
                                        Desktop Strategies?
• Centralized desktops can reduce desktop
  ...
Why (Re-)Evaluate
                                        Desktop Strategies?
• Extend lifespan of current desktop hardwar...
Desktop Virtualization
• Bottom line benefits
         – Improve mgmt and support – reduce OpEx
         – Improve securit...
Desktop Virtualization Barriers
• Previous barriers to broad implementation
  have been/are being eliminated
         – St...
Virtualization Layers

                    Before                               After
                                    ...
Virtualization Architectures
       VM 1         VM 2                                                              Virtual...
XenApp/Terminal Services Sessions
                                        Virtual Desktop Architecture                    ...
App                                                                          Manage!
      App
            App


         ...
Server Based Computing/
         Presentation Virtualization
•   Virtualizes the Presentation Layer
•   Delivery Protocol ...
User Access Device Choices
• Existing Desktops/Workstations/Laptops
         – Use current desktops as dumb terminal
     ...
Thin/Zero Client Computing
                      • Thin client computing Model
                             –   “dumb term...
XenApp/Terminal Services Sessions
                                        Virtual Desktop Infrastructure                  ...
Manage!
Server-hosted/Centralized Desktop

OS OS OS                                                         Provision OS a...
Virtual Desktop Infrastructure (VDI)
• Server-hosted, desktop virtualization
• Each user connects to VM from Thin or Rich ...
Virtual Desktop Infrastructure (VDI)
• Leverages server virtualization software
  and management/automation tools
• Howeve...
Personalization:
                                        User Virtualization
•     Separate user space from the OS
•     T...
Personalization and User
      Environment Management
• Enables users to access their files and
  customized settings from...
Virtual Desktop Considerations
 • User experience
 • Provisioning
          – Templates, pools, persistence
          – Se...
Hidden Costs
•   Cheap PC storage to expensive SAN storage
•   Lots of duplicate storage (OS images, apps, data)
•   Serve...
Adoption in 2010 is about
                     Overcoming historical barriers
• Barriers being eliminated
         – Stora...
MS VDI Licensing changes
                      • No separate license to access a VDI Windows
                        deskt...
Server Hosted DV
                                           The Big Three
• VMware: View 4 on ESX VI3, vSphere, View
  Com...
XenApp/Terminal Services Sessions
                                        Virtual Desktop Architecture                    ...
Multi-OS or Developer/Tester
           Desktop
      – User has full admin capabilities
      – Can leverage golden image...
Managed PC hosted
      – Virtualization of the PC desktop, setup/managed centrally
      – Work-at-home, contractor, trai...
Client-Hosted
                                Desktop Virtualization
  Hosted Virtualization (Type 2)                     ...
XenApp/Terminal Services Sessions
                                        Virtual Desktop Architecture                    ...
Manage!
PC/Workstation Blade -Centralized Desktop

 OS OS OS                                                           Pro...
PC and Workstation Blades
• Full PC/workstation in centrally located
  chassis
• Usually one-to-one – not virtualized
• Us...
PC/Workstation Blades
• HP
       – Early, first big player -- PC and Workstation blades, HP
         and Neoware clients
...
Application Virtualization

Native Installed
  Applications



                                Virtualization    Virtualiz...
Applications are                                             Tilt the panes and
placed in layers within                   ...
Application Virtualization and Streaming
             Data Center                                      Executes on User De...
App Virt Players
•     VMware ThinApp (Thinstall)
•     Microsoft App-V (SoftGrid)
•     Citrix XenApp
•     Symantec (SVS...
Use Cases And Technologies
                                   Multi-user            Virtual Desktop           Smart
Server...
Use Cases, Technologies, and Vendor Solutions
                                            VMware View,
                   ...
Conclusions: Future Directions
• Market
         – Inflection point for Desktop Virtualization – 2010
         – Most barr...
Conclusions:
• Technology Summary
         –    Overall management tools improving
         –    Provisioning improvements...
Conclusions: Evaluate the Landscape
• Citrix has been leader in understanding
  apps/desktops. XenDesktop XenApp crosses t...
Recommendations
• Examine all your use case requirements
• Consider but don’t limit to your existing virtualization
  vend...
Resources
  • FOCUS Website:
    http://www.focusonsystems.com/research/
  • FOCUS Research Reports, Vendor Briefs, Profil...
Give Us A Piece Of Your Mind!
           Please fill out an Interop evaluation form:
               interop.com/evaluation...
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×

Desktop virtualization primer one size does not fit all

2,384

Published on

Published in: Education
0 Comments
2 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

No Downloads
Views
Total Views
2,384
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
0
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
148
Comments
0
Likes
2
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

Desktop virtualization primer one size does not fit all

  1. 1. Primer: Virtual Desktop Delivery- Desktop and Application One Size Does Not Fit All Virtualization Barb Goldworm President and Chief Analyst
  2. 2. Barb Goldworm • President & chief analyst, FOCUS (www.focusonsystems.com), an analyst firm focused on systems, storage & next generation data centers • Barb has 30 years experience in systems and storage with IBM, StorageTek, Novell, Enterprise Management Associates, multiple successful startups • Expert Columnist since 1990s – NetworkWorld, ComputerWorld SNWOnline, TechTarget SearchServerVirtualization, SearchVMware, Virtual DataCenter Virtual-Strategy Magazine, Business Trends Quarterly • Author: 100s of research reports, white papers, columns, book Blade Servers & Virtualization • Conference Keynote Speaker/Chair/Advisory Board: Chair/Advisor: Interop Virtualization, DataCenter Insights, CloudConnect… Judge: Best of VMworld, Product of the Year Keynote speaker: Tech Target Storage Decisions, Avnet Road To Virtualization Tour, VirtualPath University, StoragePath University… © 2010 FOCUS - www.focusonsystems.com 2
  3. 3. Virtualization Adoption In production > 24 Storage months Virtualization In production 12-24 months In production 6-12 Application months Virtualization In production < 6 months Desktop Planning to impl < 6 months Virtualization Planning to impl 6-12 mo Server Planning to Virtualization implement > 12 mo No plans 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% Source: FOCUS Research Series – Managing the Virtual Environment © 2010 FOCUS - www.focusonsystems.com 3
  4. 4. Top 3 Priorities for Next Virtualization Efforts Expand server virt. to > servers and apps Implement desktop virtualization Impl performance management Impl server virtualization Impl storage management Impl capacity management Impl security management Impl VM lifecycle management Impl storage virtualization Impl data protection capabilities Expand desktop virt. to > groups/desktops Impl application virtualization Impl fault mgmt & root cause analysis Expand applications being virtualized Implement networked storage 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% Source: FOCUS Research Series – Managing the Virtual Environment © 2010 FOCUS - www.focusonsystems.com © 2009 FOCUS - www.focusonsystems.com 4
  5. 5. Defining Desktop and Application Virtualization • Desktops – Server Hosted • Server-Based Computing – shared published desktops/apps • Virtual Desktop Infrastructure (VDI) – server hosted virtual desktops (VMs) – Client Hosted • Locally managed virtual desktops (VMs) • Centrally managed virtual desktops (VMs) • Applications – Application virtualization - isolation/sandboxing – Application streaming for local execution © 2010 FOCUS - www.focusonsystems.com 5
  6. 6. XenApp/Terminal Services Sessions Virtual Desktop Infrastructure Multi-User Architecture User Access Devices PC Virtual Desktops (VMs) App 1 App 2 PC App 1 App 2 Guest OS App 1 App 2 App 1 App 2 Guest OS Thin Client Thin Client App 1 App 2 App 1 App 2 App 1 App 2 Guest OS Laptop Laptop Hypervisor Windows (TS) Server Server Hosted Server PC or Workstation Client Hosted Contractor/ Blades Multi-OS or DeveloperDesktop Work from Home Desktop Vista XP Secured/Managed Virtual Desktop Mac OS Unmanaged Win 7 Linux Personal/Contractor Desktop Microsoft Virtual PC, Windows Virtual PC Parallels Desktop, Oracle VirtualBox MED-V (Kidaro), ClearCube, HP, IBM, Verari VMware WorkStation, Player, Fusion, VMware ACE, © 2010 FOCUS - www.focusonsystems.com VMware CVP, Xen client RingCube vDesk
  7. 7. Business Drivers -- IT issues • Desktop and application support/management has plagued IT since corporate adoption of PCs • Desktop operating costs are high – Refresh cycles raise cost/benefit questions -- frequency of desktop HW upgrades versus thin client – Upgrading Win 7 vs. shift to thin client/virtual desktops • Security issues on the rise -- risk of information theft • Environmental issues of distributed desktops vs. centralized • Mergers and acquisitions/New employees • Initial VDI success where security and compliance were key and not just cost © 2010 FOCUS - www.focusonsystems.com 7
  8. 8. Business Drivers: Changing User Needs • Increase in remote user scenarios – Remote workers – Contract workers – Work from home scenarios • Changing “desktop” – Laptops, smartphones, netbooks, BYOC – Move to Windows 7 • Broad range of user types and requirements – Power Users – Knowledge Workers – Task Users – Mobile Users • Survey users to assess requirements © 2010 FOCUS - www.focusonsystems.com 8
  9. 9. Technical Drivers • Server virtualization adoption (products, people, process) • Server, network improvements - reliability/bandwidth • Virtual desktop infrastructure (VDI) improvements • Application streaming and virtualization • Personalization improvements • Client hypervisors & Mobile platforms • Graphics protocols improvements (PCoIP, HDX, RDP 7) • Offline check in/check out • Windows 7 Installation © 2010 FOCUS - www.focusonsystems.com 9
  10. 10. Windows 7 Migration • Most companies skipped Vista • XP support ending • Win 7 requires more memory and faster processors • Installation not upgrade • Sever the connection between hardware refresh and OS upgrade through virtualization abstraction © 2010 FOCUS - www.focusonsystems.com 10
  11. 11. Why (Re-)Evaluate Desktop Strategies? • Centralized desktops can reduce desktop management/support operating costs and improve user satisfaction – Provision/update from shared OS and app images – Eliminate application interaction support problems – Minimize/eliminate SW on physical desktops – Backup user data © 2010 FOCUS - www.focusonsystems.com 11
  12. 12. Why (Re-)Evaluate Desktop Strategies? • Extend lifespan of current desktop hardware • Provide desktop and application access from anywhere • Increase security of desktop data and applications • Improve compliance management • Increase desktop reliability, availability, serviceability • Windows 7 will require touching every desktop © 2010 FOCUS - www.focusonsystems.com 12
  13. 13. Desktop Virtualization • Bottom line benefits – Improve mgmt and support – reduce OpEx – Improve security – Get user data backed up – Extend desktop hardware lifespan – Increase reliability, availability, serviceability © 2010 FOCUS - www.focusonsystems.com 13
  14. 14. Desktop Virtualization Barriers • Previous barriers to broad implementation have been/are being eliminated – Storage issues (image management) – User experience/interface (e.g. graphics) – Personalization – layering user info on top of virtual desktops and virtual applications – Mobile/offline user issues – Licensing/cost issues © 2010 FOCUS - www.focusonsystems.com 14
  15. 15. Virtualization Layers Before After Personalization User Profile Applications Application Virtualization Applications Operating System Operating System Hardware HW Virtualization Hardware © 2010 FOCUS - www.focusonsystems.com 15
  16. 16. Virtualization Architectures VM 1 VM 2 Virtual Virtual Environment Environment Virtualization layer Virtual Virtual Environment Environment VM 1 VM 2 VM 3 VM 4 Host OS OS Virtualization Layer Virtualization layer Host OS Hardware Hardware Hardware Hosted Virtualization Bare-Metal Hypervisor OS Virtualization Virtualization • Solaris Containers • VMware Server, • VMware ESX, ESXi • Parallels Virtuozzo Player, Workstation • Citrix XenServer • MS Virtual Server, • MS Hyper-V Virtual PC • Client Hypervisor (VMware & Citrix) © 2010 FOCUS - www.focusonsystems.com 16
  17. 17. XenApp/Terminal Services Sessions Virtual Desktop Architecture Multi-User Architecture User Access Devices PC Virtual Desktops (VMs) App 1 App 2 PC App 1 App 2 Guest OS App 1 App 2 App 1 App 2 Guest OS Thin Client Thin Client App 1 App 2 App 1 App 2 App 1 App 2 Guest OS Laptop Laptop Hypervisor Windows (TS) Server Server Hosted Server PC or Workstation Client Hosted Contractor/ Blades Multi-OS or DeveloperDesktop Work from Home Desktop Vista XP Secured/Managed Virtual Desktop Mac OS Unmanaged Win 7 Linux Personal/Contractor Desktop Microsoft Virtual PC, Parallels Desktop, MS EDV (Kidaro), ClearCube, HP, IBM, Verari VMware WorkStation, Player, Fusion VMware ACE, © 2009 FOCUS - www.focusonsystems.com VMware CVP, Xen client RingCube vDesk
  18. 18. App Manage! App App Provision Apps App Delivery Protocol App App App App App App App App App App App App App XenApp/ XenApp/ Terminal Services XenApp/ Terminal Services Terminal Services Operating System Operating System Operating System Server Server Server Connection Manager Server Infrastructure Connection User Access Management/Security Device(s) 18 © 2010 FOCUS - www.focusonsystems.com
  19. 19. Server Based Computing/ Presentation Virtualization • Virtualizes the Presentation Layer • Delivery Protocol – RDP, ICA, HDX, EnhancedRDP • Connection Manager – Session Manager, Dynamic/Static • Highly controlled environment • Corporate applications • Task workers (e.g. call centers) • No user customization • Highest ratio of users/server 19 © 2010 FOCUS - www.focusonsystems.com
  20. 20. User Access Device Choices • Existing Desktops/Workstations/Laptops – Use current desktops as dumb terminal – No upfront CapEx investment • Thin Clients • Zero Clients • PDAs and Smart Phones • Future Mobile Devices? © 2010 FOCUS - www.focusonsystems.com 20
  21. 21. Thin/Zero Client Computing • Thin client computing Model – “dumb terminal” legacy – Application on server – UI on client device – Thin/Zero client device – Thick/Fat client • Benefits – Minimal-to-no SW updates – Longevity – Reduced support – Less vulnerable – Green - Reduced power/cooling – CapEx, OpEx 21 © 2010 FOCUS - www.focusonsystems.com
  22. 22. XenApp/Terminal Services Sessions Virtual Desktop Infrastructure Multi-User Architecture User Access Devices PC Virtual Desktops (VMs) App 1 App 2 PC App 1 App 2 Guest OS App 1 App 2 App 1 App 2 Guest OS Thin Client Thin Client App 1 App 2 App 1 App 2 App 1 App 2 Guest OS Laptop Laptop Hypervisor Windows (TS) Server Server Hosted Server PC or Workstation Client Hosted Contractor/ Blades Multi-OS or DeveloperDesktop Work from Home Desktop Vista XP Secured/Managed Virtual Desktop Mac OS Unmanaged Win 7 Linux Personal/Contractor Desktop Microsoft Virtual PC, Parallels Desktop, MS EDV (Kidaro), ClearCube, HP, IBM, Verari VMware WorkStation, Player, Fusion VMware ACE, © 2009 FOCUS - www.focusonsystems.com VMware CVP, Xen client RingCube vDesk
  23. 23. Manage! Server-hosted/Centralized Desktop OS OS OS Provision OS and Apps App App App App Delivery Protocol App App App App App App App App App App App App App App App App App App App App App App App App App App App OS OS OS OS OS OS OS OS OS Virtual Virtual Machine Virtual Infrastructure Infrastructure Infrastructure Hardware Connection Hardware Manager Virtual Infrastructure Connection User Access © 2010 FOCUS - www.focusonsystems.com Management/Security Device(s) 23
  24. 24. Virtual Desktop Infrastructure (VDI) • Server-hosted, desktop virtualization • Each user connects to VM from Thin or Rich Client • VMs can be customized, user has more control than published apps • Dedicated or pooled, persistent/non-persistent • Connection broker/manager handles connecting user to VM (Published Apps, Workstation/PC Blade) • Integrates with AD, LDAP • Licensing options -- MS VECD 24 © 2010 FOCUS - www.focusonsystems.com
  25. 25. Virtual Desktop Infrastructure (VDI) • Leverages server virtualization software and management/automation tools • However, managing desktops are different than managing servers! 25 © 2010 FOCUS - www.focusonsystems.com
  26. 26. Personalization: User Virtualization • Separate user space from the OS • Traditional profile settings • Personalized settings • Applications • Printing settings • Context information • Central management • Dynamic composition © 2010 FOCUS - www.focusonsystems.com 26
  27. 27. Personalization and User Environment Management • Enables users to access their files and customized settings from any approved device – VMware (RTO Virtual Profiles) – Citrix (Sepago) – AppSense Environment Manager – Liquidware ProfileUnity – Microsoft Windows and Win 7 27 © 2010 FOCUS - www.focusonsystems.com
  28. 28. Virtual Desktop Considerations • User experience • Provisioning – Templates, pools, persistence – Separate OS, apps, profiles, data • Storage and image management – PC Storage to central SAN storage – Central image management • Golden images, linked clones, OS Streaming – Duplication and deduplication • Offline usage – Offline VDI, App Streaming © 2010 FOCUS - www.focusonsystems.com 28
  29. 29. Hidden Costs • Cheap PC storage to expensive SAN storage • Lots of duplicate storage (OS images, apps, data) • Server and storage hardware on back-end • Space in data center • Possible network upgrade • Move to thin client – now vs later 29 © 2010 FOCUS - www.focusonsystems.com
  30. 30. Adoption in 2010 is about Overcoming historical barriers • Barriers being eliminated – Storage issues (image management) – User experience – interface (e.g. graphics) – Personalization – layered on top of virtual desktops and virtual applications – Mobile users – Licensing & pricing (Desktop OS and Apps) © 2010 FOCUS - www.focusonsystems.com 30
  31. 31. MS VDI Licensing changes • No separate license to access a VDI Windows desktop for Software Assurance customers (Virtual Desktop Access (VDA) rights included) • Non-SA customers – VDA now $100 per device per year (VECD was $110) • VDA users can access their VDI Windows desktop and MS Office apps on secondary, non-corporate network devices, such as home PCs and kiosks • Replaces VECD • Effective July 1, 2010 © 2010 FOCUS - www.focusonsystems.com 31
  32. 32. Server Hosted DV The Big Three • VMware: View 4 on ESX VI3, vSphere, View Composer, View Manager, RDP, PCoIP, ThinApp • Citrix: XenDesktop 4 on XenServer, (or ESX or Hyper-V), Desktop Provisioning, ICA, HDX, FlexCast – XenDesktop includes XenApp • Microsoft: VDI Suites on Hyper-V, Windows Server 2008 R2 Remote Desktop Services, RDP 7, Windows 7, App-V, M-EDV, RemoteFX(future) © 2010 FOCUS - www.focusonsystems.com 32
  33. 33. XenApp/Terminal Services Sessions Virtual Desktop Architecture Multi-User Architecture User Access Devices PC Virtual Desktops (VMs) App 1 App 2 PC App 1 App 2 Guest OS App 1 App 2 App 1 App 2 Guest OS Thin Client Thin Client App 1 App 2 App 1 App 2 App 1 App 2 Guest OS Laptop Laptop Hypervisor Windows (TS) Server Server Hosted Server PC or Workstation Client Hosted Contractor/ Blades Multi-OS or DeveloperDesktop Work from Home Desktop Vista XP Secured/Managed Virtual Desktop Mac OS Unmanaged Win 7 Linux Personal/Contractor Desktop Microsoft Virtual PC, Parallels Desktop, MS EDV (Kidaro), ClearCube, HP, IBM, Verari VMware WorkStation, Player, Fusion VMware ACE, © 2009 FOCUS - www.focusonsystems.com VMware CVP, Xen client RingCube vDesk
  34. 34. Multi-OS or Developer/Tester Desktop – User has full admin capabilities – Can leverage golden image for easy provisioning – Vendors • VMware Workstation, Player, MS Virtual PC • Future VMware CVP & Citrix XenClient • VMware Fusion, Parallels Desktop • Virtual Computer 34 © 2010 FOCUS - www.focusonsystems.com April 10 34
  35. 35. Managed PC hosted – Virtualization of the PC desktop, setup/managed centrally – Work-at-home, contractor, training lab – Highly controlled one-to-many • Data encryption • Desktop lockout – timed/instantaneous • Local device access • Connections • Applications – VMware ACE, Moka5, RingCube, MS Kidaro, Virtual Computer 35 © 2010 FOCUS - www.focusonsystems.com April 10 35
  36. 36. Client-Hosted Desktop Virtualization Hosted Virtualization (Type 2) Bare-Metal (Type 1) Hypervisor • VMware Workstation • Neocleus • Virtual PC • Virtual Computer • Windows Virtual PC • XenClient (Win 7 XP Mode) • VMware CVP Guest Operating System Virtualization Layer Guest Operating Guest Operating System System Native Desktop Operating System Virtualization Layer Hardware © 2010 FOCUS - www.focusonsystems.com Hardware 36
  37. 37. XenApp/Terminal Services Sessions Virtual Desktop Architecture Multi-User Architecture User Access Devices PC Virtual Desktops (VMs) App 1 App 2 PC App 1 App 2 Guest OS App 1 App 2 App 1 App 2 Guest OS Thin Client Thin Client App 1 App 2 App 1 App 2 App 1 App 2 Guest OS Laptop Laptop Hypervisor Windows (TS) Server Server Hosted Server PC or Workstation Client Hosted Contractor/ Blades Multi-OS or DeveloperDesktop Work from Home Desktop Vista XP Secured/Managed Virtual Desktop Mac OS Unmanaged Win 7 Linux Personal/Contractor Desktop Microsoft Virtual PC, Parallels Desktop, MS EDV (Kidaro), ClearCube, HP, IBM, Verari VMware WorkStation, Player, Fusion VMware ACE, © 2009 FOCUS - www.focusonsystems.com VMware CVP, Xen client RingCube vDesk
  38. 38. Manage! PC/Workstation Blade -Centralized Desktop OS OS OS Provision OS and Apps App App App App Delivery Protocol App App App App App App App App App OS OS OS PC Blade PC Blade PC Blade Connection Manager PC/workstation Blade User Access Infrastructure Connection Device(s) Management/Security © 2010 FOCUS - www.focusonsystems.com © 2009 FOCUS - www.focusonsystems.com 38
  39. 39. PC and Workstation Blades • Full PC/workstation in centrally located chassis • Usually one-to-one – not virtualized • Use cases – Graphics/heavy compute power-user • CAD/CAE • Trading floor 39 © 2010 FOCUS - www.focusonsystems.com 39
  40. 40. PC/Workstation Blades • HP – Early, first big player -- PC and Workstation blades, HP and Neoware clients – RGS graphics compression (SW) • Clearcube – Early leader in PC blades – Trading floor, Hospital operating rooms, ERs – Graphics compression (Teradici), quad monitors and user ports • IBM – Workstation blade, DevonIT client – Graphics compression (Teradici) 40 © 2010 FOCUS - www.focusonsystems.com April 10 40
  41. 41. Application Virtualization Native Installed Applications Virtualization Virtualization Virtualization Sandbox Sandbox Sandbox Desktop Operating System 41 © 2010 FOCUS - www.focusonsystems.com
  42. 42. Applications are Tilt the panes and placed in layers within the applications Microsoft Windows, appear to the user like panes of glass, each as expected with their own “Registry” Virtual Application Sandboxes Native OS + Applications 42 © 2010 FOCUS - www.focusonsystems.com
  43. 43. Application Virtualization and Streaming Data Center Executes on User Devices APP APP APP APP APP APP APP APP Red XP Vista Hat Solaris Adobe Reader VM VM VM VM Desktop Virtualization SW Desktop OS Visio 1 to Many Local Desktop Virtualization MS Office 2003 MS MS Adobe Office Office Visio Reader 2007 2003 Application Packaging/ Sequencing Server MS IE Office Application Virtualization 2007 Desktop OS Web or Streaming Server © 2010 FOCUS - www.focusonsystems.com Application Virtualization 43
  44. 44. App Virt Players • VMware ThinApp (Thinstall) • Microsoft App-V (SoftGrid) • Citrix XenApp • Symantec (SVS and AppStream) • InstallFree • Xenocode Virtual Application Studio © 2010 FOCUS - www.focusonsystems.com 44
  45. 45. Use Cases And Technologies Multi-user Virtual Desktop Smart Server-hosted Server-based Infrastructure Phone Delivery Computing Application Virtualization and Streaming Managed PC and Managed Client-hosted Workstation Client-hosted) Blades Client-hosted Delivery Client-hosted Virtual Desktop Task Users Knowledge Workers Power Users Mobile Users 45 © 2010 FOCUS - www.focusonsystems.com
  46. 46. Use Cases, Technologies, and Vendor Solutions VMware View, Citrix XenDesktop, Citrix Server-based MS Terminal MS VDI Suite, Receiver, Delivery Services, RedHat Enterprise VMware Citrix XenApp Desktop (KVM), MVP Sun VDI/SGD MS App-V, Citrix XenApp , Symantec SVS, InstallFree MS EDV, IBM, HP, MS EDV, ClearCube, VMware ACE, VMware ACE, RingCube Client-based Teradici, RingCube Verari Delivery VMware Workstation, Player & Fusion, Parallels Desktop, MS Virtual PC, VMware CVP, Citrix XenClient Task Users Knowledge Power Users Mobile Users Workers 46 © 2010 FOCUS - www.focusonsystems.com
  47. 47. Conclusions: Future Directions • Market – Inflection point for Desktop Virtualization – 2010 – Most barriers now eliminated – Increased focus on security and compliance – Increased focus on management issues – Licensing issues slow to change – Pricing changes continuing © 2010 FOCUS - www.focusonsystems.com 47
  48. 48. Conclusions: • Technology Summary – Overall management tools improving – Provisioning improvements – Storage improvements – Offline improvements in progress – Client Hypervisors in progress – Mobile Platforms 2010/2011 – Increasing separation of desktop, OS, app, user data – App Stores modeled after iTunes – Shift from device management to user/services mgmt © 2010 FOCUS - www.focusonsystems.com 48
  49. 49. Conclusions: Evaluate the Landscape • Citrix has been leader in understanding apps/desktops. XenDesktop XenApp crosses the most use cases. Strengths: flexibility, bandwidth, application & networking • VMware has been leader in server virtualization and managing the VMware infrastructure Strengths: density, simplicity, server virt mgmt tools • Microsoft has been leader in desktop and server operating systems and applications Strengths: cost, desktop & integration and mgmt © 2010 FOCUS - www.focusonsystems.com 49
  50. 50. Recommendations • Examine all your use case requirements • Consider but don’t limit to your existing virtualization vendors/solutions • Don’t just treat desktops like servers • Evaluate both user experience and IT impacts • Consider storage and networking issues as key parts of decision • Build cross-functional teams (server, desktop, storage, networking) • Consider major vendors and startups • Don’t be afraid of mix and match solutions • One size does NOT fit all © 2010 FOCUS - www.focusonsystems.com 50
  51. 51. Resources • FOCUS Website: http://www.focusonsystems.com/research/ • FOCUS Research Reports, Vendor Briefs, Profiles & events New – FOCUS Research Series: Managing the Virtual Infrastructure – FOCUS Research Series: Desktop & Application Delivery – White Papers, Solution Profiles, Briefs – Road2Virtualization events, Road2Information Optimization – Interop Virtualization Workshops and Track Sessions • FOCUS Columns, Webcasts, Podcasts: – Information Week, TechTarget, Business Trends Quarterly, Virtual Strategy Magazine • Book: Blade Servers and Virtualization • Email: barbgoldworm@focusonsystems.com © 2010 FOCUS - www.focusonsystems.com 51
  52. 52. Give Us A Piece Of Your Mind! Please fill out an Interop evaluation form: interop.com/evaluations Your feedback helps us continue to offer the most comprehensive education programs! Each day, one respondent will be selected to receive a free conference pass to Interop New York 2010 or Interop Las Vegas 2011. Thank You!
  1. A particular slide catching your eye?

    Clipping is a handy way to collect important slides you want to go back to later.

×