• Share
  • Email
  • Embed
  • Like
  • Save
  • Private Content
Ppt presentation emilie_tack

Ppt presentation emilie_tack






Total Views
Views on SlideShare
Embed Views



0 Embeds 0

No embeds


Upload Details

Uploaded via as Microsoft PowerPoint

Usage Rights

© All Rights Reserved

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
Post Comment
Edit your comment

    Ppt presentation emilie_tack Ppt presentation emilie_tack Presentation Transcript

    • Hungary-EU-Israel Workshop Start-Ups and Innovation Tel Aviv, 30th May 2011 The Innovation Union flagship initiative and framework conditions  :  How to provide incentives for start-ups early-stage innovation?  Emilie Tack, Innovation Policy Unit DG Research and Innovation
      • Globalization of knowledge and innovation capacities
      • Impact of the crisis on public finances and business (especially innovative SMEs)
      •  The EU has lost six million jobs, € 1,000 billion of annual GDP during the crisis;
      • Major challenges
      • Maximize available resources by leverage, integration and cooperation
      •  The EU target of 3% of GDP for R&D in 2020 could create 3.7 million net new jobs and nearly € 800 billion of annual GDP by 2025
      Urgent need to fill the GAP at any level! Europe is facing a major innovation emergency
    • Evolution of World R&D expenditure in real terms PPS in millions € at 2000 prices
      • Ever stronger global competition for investments & markets
      • US and Japan lead on innovation whilst emerging economies are quickly catching up
      • On current trends, China is set to overtake the EU by 2014
      China excluding Hong-Kong Source: European Commission The EU must close the innovation gap now
    • Research and innovation performance: EU Member States Source: Innovation Union Scoreboard 2010 Note: the index used for comparison in the this chart is based on a set of 24 indicators Strong variations across Member States ES EU
      • Competitors’ success: no accident nor luck
      • Our key partners and emerging economies (eg. China, India, Brazil) follow a strategic approach to innovation and implement it!
      • A strategic approach to innovation =
        • Innovation is the overarching policy objective driving all other policies ( education , skills, regional development, standards, tax policy …)
        • Innovation policy is steered & monitored at the highest level (Prime Ministers are in charge)
      What can we learn from our competitors?
    • Our partners invest more in higher education Expenditure on tertiary education (% GDP)
    • US leads top universities ranking % in the top university institutions of the 2010 Shanghai list Source: European Commission
    • Students enrolment Number of undergraduate students 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 Millions China Source: DB Research, Eurostat, Figures for 2008-2009 for EU+US+JP are estimates National Statistics of China, 2010 Japan United States EU
      • A flagship initiative of the Europe 2020 strategy
      • Radically improving the framework conditions and reducing time-to-market
      • Tackling underinvestment, fragmentation and duplication (“critical mass”)
      • Using public funding to leverage private R&D (e.g. the EU Risk Sharing Finance Facility - RSFF)
      • Promoting massive investment in skills, education, research and innovation especially through « recovery » packages ( “Smart” fiscal consolidation )
      • See: http://ec.europa.eu/research/innovation-union/index_en.cfm
      EU’s strategic approach: Innovation Union
      • A “standardisation package” – comprising a Communication and a legislative proposal, to be adopted in May.
      • 2 implementing legislative proposals to create a unitary patent protection (under enhanced cooperation between 25 MS) presented on 13 April.
      • Proposals for putting in place an operational framework for the cross-border operation of venture capital funds by 2012.
      • A review of the State aid research and development and innovation framework in 2011
      • Proposals to exploit public procurement budgets for innovative products and services by the end of 2011
      Improving Framework conditions
    • Key Framework conditions Source: Eurostat R&D procurement expenditures ( excl. defence ) in the US and EU in Bn € - 2007 Source: European Commission Early-stage Venture Capital in Bn €, 2000 and 2009
    • IU Commitment 11
      • By 2012, the Commission will ensure that Venture Capital funds established in any Member State can function and invest freely in the EU
      • (If necessary by adopting a new legislative regime).
    • European Council conclusions follow-up
      • Every effort should be pursued to lift remaining legal and administrative obstacles to the cross-border operation of venture capital.
      • The Commission is invited to present proposals by the end of 2011 for putting in place an EU-wide venture capital scheme
    • IU Commitment 10
      • By 2014: on the basis of Commission proposals, the EU should put in place financial instruments to attract a major increase in private finance and close the market gaps in investing in research and innovation.
    • European Council conclusions follow-up
      • The Commission is invited to present proposals by the end of 2011 for scaling up the Risk Sharing Finance Facility
      • During 2011-2013, we will expand the scope and scale of RSFF implementing recommendations of the RSFF interim evaluation
    • Risk-Sharing Finance Facility (RSFF) Policy Support : current state of play
      • Moving towards a Portfolio First-Loss Piece for the whole RSFF (by end-2011), enabling a potential higher leverage effect on the EU financial contribution (cf. facing the level of demand until end-2013) and more support for target groups such as SMEs and research infrastructures
      • Launch of a dedicated window to address research-intensive and innovative SMEs and mid-caps (early 2012)
    • After 2013? Greater investment in R&D Next MFF Debt and equity Financial instrument ? Europe 2020 Europe 2020
    • RSFF post 2013? Innovation Credit Facility Good practice from the Netherlands
      • Most applicants for loans are young start-ups
      • Strong stress on the eligibility criteria on the developmental approach
      • Risk sharing
      • Cooperation-to-be with EIB
    • An integrated approach for the use of financial instruments to support R&D&I
        • Preparing the ground for the implementation of IUC 10
        • e.g. debt financial instrument in future CSF
      • Debt instrument will provide debt finance for risky investments in R&I activities and will cover loans, guarantees…
      • Equity instrument for early and growth stages investments :
          • Support to early stage and seed investment
          • Support to the development of EU venture capital
    • Current Programme s (2007/2013) R&D 7FP (DG RTD) Innovation (i) CIP (DG ENTR) Future Programme (2014/2020) R&D&I CSF EIPs Innovation Union Towards a Common Strategic Framework The European Institute for Innovation and Technology
    • Next steps towards a CSF
      • Follow up:
        • Analysis of contributions by Commission
        • Major event to conclude consultation (10 June 2011)
        • Inputs to preparation of Commission proposals
      • Commission proposals:
        • for post 2013 EU budget (June 2011)
        • for the Common Strategic Framework (by end of 2011)
      • Legislative decisions on the Common Strategic Framework by the Council and European Parliament (2012-13)
      • => Common Strategic Framework (from 2014)
    • Lessons learnt from current EU R&I funding
      • Cross-border pooling of resources
      • More competition in research
      • Focus on Excellence
      • Wide range of training possibilities
      • Raise of the international attractiveness of EU R&I
      • Fragmentation
      • Need for further simplification
      • Better strategy for innovation
      • Need to focus resources to address grand challenges
      • Broaden participation
      • Clearer agendas
    • Thank you for your attention