• Share
  • Email
  • Embed
  • Like
  • Save
  • Private Content
Logistieke Barcamp 9 juni 2011 - Tri-Vizor
 

Logistieke Barcamp 9 juni 2011 - Tri-Vizor

on

  • 617 views

 

Statistics

Views

Total Views
617
Views on SlideShare
617
Embed Views
0

Actions

Likes
0
Downloads
6
Comments
0

0 Embeds 0

No embeds

Accessibility

Categories

Upload Details

Uploaded via as Adobe PDF

Usage Rights

© All Rights Reserved

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Processing…
Post Comment
Edit your comment

    Logistieke Barcamp 9 juni 2011 - Tri-Vizor Logistieke Barcamp 9 juni 2011 - Tri-Vizor Presentation Transcript

    • “Georkestreerde horizontale samenwerking” Duurzame logistiek door co-modaliteit en goederenstroombundeling Logistieke Barcamp Innovatiecentrum Limburg - PHL Bart Vannieuwenhuyse 09-06-11© 2011
    • World Economic Forum Supply Chain Study 2009 ≡ 24% of good vehicles in the EU are running empty ≡ Average loading of the rest is 57% ≡ Overall efficiency: 43% ≡ Flow imbalance could only explain half of this loss ≡ Knowing that transport and logistics are responsible for 14-20% of global carbon footprint ≡ Given the network capacity limitations and the freight flow demand growth forecasts How much longer can this be justified?© 2011
    • How to react? ≡ Regulation ≡ e.g. smart road pricing, the Eurovignette directive,… ≡ Innovation ≡ traffic avoidance through product development (e.g. iPad) ≡ design for logistics ≡ transport technology innovation ≡ Horizontal collaboration – bundling of freight flows ≡ “logical, but not easy” ≡ requires ≡ a new type of co-operation (‘co-opetition’) ≡ new logistics actors: impartial orchestrators,… ≡ new types multilateral agreements ≡ trust ≡ expertise© 2011
    • Vision on logistics Sustainability ≡ Since 2006 : Trade off between 3 supply chain forces further decreases optimisation and improvement potential Supply Chain Optimisation Efficiency Effectiveness© 2011
    • Sustainability? ≡ Focus on climate – Carbon Footprint ≡ CO2 eq ≡ Long term – global ≡ But also pollution – the environment - health ≡ NOx, SO2, PM10,… ≡ Short term - local© 2011
    • Climate Effect Carbon footprint Multimodal Transport TRI-VIZOR, 2010. Rule of thumb Truck – 1 km – 1 kg CO2eq Train – 1 km – 12 kg CO2eq© 2011
    • Vision on logistics ≡ Only cross-company collaboration, consolidation and bundling of flows can further improve efficiency, effectiveness and sustainability simultaneously Effectiveness Supply Cross Chain Supply Sustainability Supply Chain Supply Chain Chain Optimisation Supply Chain Efficiency© 2011
    • Bundling and consolidation Point-to-Point: simple Low effectiveness Low efficiency Low sustainability Decoupling: challenging High effectiveness High efficiency through volume High sustainability© 2011
    • Horizontal collaboration The global strategic objectives for the consumer goods industry: 1. Make our business more sustainable 2. Optimize a shared supply chain 3. Engage with technology-enabled consumers 4. Serve the health and wellbeing of consumers Future Value Chain 2020: building strategies for the new decade, The Consumer Goods Forum, Capgemini and HP 2010© 2011
    • The making of The Worlds First Orchestrated Horizontal Collaboration© 2011
    • What is Orchestration? ≡ Synchronizing supply chains of multiple shippers and generate substantial gains ≡ Consolidation in geography and time - smart bundling ≡ Managing the consolidation from a shipper’s perspective© 2011
    • Orchestration guarantees ≡ Impartial moderation (trustee and referee) of the community of shippers ≡ Anti-trust compliance: full transparency of the community information while keeping confidential the company-specific information ≡ Correct gain sharing ≡ Maximum stability of community based on contracts with clear exit and volume strategies for each member ≡ A pro-active expansion of the community with new flows ≡ Comfort…© 2011
    • Cross Supply Chain® Consolidation Methodology© 2011
    • Cross Supply Chain® Database Looking for collaboration partners among: ≡ Almost 80 companies (mostly blue chip) ≡ Almost 50 000 transport lanes LSP Pharma & Other Healthcare High Tech Automotive Chemistry FMCG & Food© 2011
    • Multilateral contract Tri-partite multilateral contract Extended Carrier Contract Contract of means Order status, POD • Invoicing services Clauses with Shipper 1 Invoice, Reporting • Planning mechanisms for • Gain sharing calculations • Gain sharing Shipper 2 • Community management • Volume variations Individual orders • Expansion, entries & exits • Entry/Exit Shipper n • Reporting Services • Continuous improvement • Advisory Mandate Orchestration Services POD, Invoice Carrier Combined orders, Reporting© 2011
    • Orchestration Process© 2011
    • ORDER DATA CAPACITY DATA TARIFF DATA Shippers Carriers / 3PLs Carriers / 3PLs XML e-mail Booking platform (Transwide,…) SUPPLY CHAIN REPORTING INVOICING VISIBILITY Overview combined shipments WEEK 43 Delivery Capacity Additional Total Pallet Opportunity POLAND Company Order no Pallets Savings date Cost Costs cost price costs Individual Shipments X 80173526 4 6/11/2010 580 580 145,0 35,6 Individual Shipments Y 20100612 28 7/11/2010 1470 1470 52,5 249,4 Total Individual Shipments 32 2050 2050 64,1 Combined Shipment X+Y 32 6/11/2010 1440 325 1765 55,2 285,0 Delivery Capacity Additional Total Pallet Opportunity POLAND Company Order no Pallets Savings date Cost Costs cost price costs Individual Shipments X 80174989 10 8/11/2010 950 950 95,0 198,5 Individual Shipments Y 20100615 23 8/11/2010 1470 1470 63,9 456,5 200 Total Individual Shipments 33 2420 2420 73,3 Combined Shipment X+Y 33 8/11/2010 1440 325 1765 53,5 655,0 200 Delivery Capacity Additional Total Pallet Opportunity HUNGARY Company Order no Pallets Savings date Cost Costs cost price costs Individual Shipments X 80174989 10 8/11/2010 1290 1290 129,0 311,7 Individual Shipments Y 20100820 20 8/11/2010 1770 1770 88,5 623,3 Total Individual Shipments 30 3060 3060 102,0 Combined Shipment X+Y 30 8/11/2010 1800 325 2125 70,8 935,0 0 Delivery Capacity Additional Total Pallet Opportunity CZECH REPUBLIC Company Order no Pallets Savings date Cost Costs cost price costs Individual Shipments X 80185555 5 8/11/2010 850 850 170,0 155,8 Individual Shipments Y 20101150 25 8/11/2010 1350 1350 54,0 187,5 Total Individual Shipments 30 2200 2200 73,3 Combined Shipment X+Y 30 8/11/2010 1650 325 1975 65,8 225,0 0 Community Management Meeting … TOTAL WEEK 43 Company Pallets Capacity Additional Total Cost Costs cost Pallet price Savings Opportunity costs Individual Shipments X 127 17500 17500 137,8 1460,6 Individual Shipments Y 430 45800 45800 106,5 4945,4 Total Individual Shipments Combined Shipment WEEK 43 X+Y TOTAL COST SAVINGS 557 557 63300 51369 63300 5525 56894 113,6 102,1 6406,0 0 Community Portal Shipper X € 12.972,2 € 1.460,6© 2011 Shipper Y TOTAL COST € 43.921,8 € 4.945,4 € 56.894,0 € 6.406,0
    • State of the art Cloud Computing© 2011
    • Horizontal collaboration – the process October 2010 ≡ Scoping to 8 destinations ≡ Feasibility analysis ≡ Consolidation concept: ≡ multiple pick-up / multiple drop ≡ Combining FTL-LTL ≡ Temperature controlled ≡ Positive Business Case© 2011
    • Horizontal collaboration – the process December 2010 ≡ Important 3PL selection criteria ≡ All time availability of capacity ≡ Pharma qualified ≡ Temperature controlled ≡ Multimodal ≡ Familiar with regional issues in Eastern Europe© 2011
    • Horizontal collaboration – the process Major Issues ≡ Gain sharing mechanisms, based on ≡ Baseline tariff: separate volumes ≡ Consolidated tariff: combined volumes ≡ CO2 calculations (ADEME protocol) ≡ Volume variation rules ≡ Entry/Exit strategy (according anti-trust) ≡ Fee structure for orchestrator: fixed + variable ≡ Orchestration services, incl. paymaster© 2011
    • Horizontal collaboration – the process March 2011 ≡ Startup lane: Romania ≡ Key: combining FTL and LTL shipments to FTL shipments with double stack ≡ Practicalities ≡ How to realize an ideal combination scheme? ≡ How to obtain lead time expansion where ever possible? 320 Sibiu 450 Brasov 50 160 1600 Braine Lessines Genk Oradea 570 Chitila Truck Train Truck 580 Bucharest Departure Genk TUE WED FRI SAT Arrival Oradea FRI SAT MON TUE Delivery Romania MON MON TUE WED Total lead time 5 4 3 4© 2011
    • Horizontal collaboration – the process April 2011 First results Romania ≡ Lead time expansions possible if pre-notified by orchestrator ≡ Net cost savings: double digit ≡ CO2 savings: > 50% (multimodal) ≡ Service level improvement© 2011
    • Horizontal collaboration – the process May - June 2011 ≡ Systematically adding new destinations ≡ Continuous improvement of interfaces and processes ≡ First talks with new community members© 2011
    • Create a (supply) chain breakthrough... ≡ Applying multimodality & co-modality through bundling of freight flows The way to go ≡ Creating breakthroughs through an orchestrated horizontal collaboration The challenge© 2011
    • Bart Vannieuwenhuyse TRI-VIZOR NV Waterfront Research Park Galileilaan 18 B-2845 Niel T: +32 3 292 62 10 F: +32 3 292 62 11 www.trivizor.com© 2011