Your SlideShare is downloading. ×
Fetal pillow - Mercer Medica
Fetal pillow - Mercer Medica
Fetal pillow - Mercer Medica
Fetal pillow - Mercer Medica
Fetal pillow - Mercer Medica
Fetal pillow - Mercer Medica
Fetal pillow - Mercer Medica
Fetal pillow - Mercer Medica
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×

Thanks for flagging this SlideShare!

Oops! An error has occurred.

×
Saving this for later? Get the SlideShare app to save on your phone or tablet. Read anywhere, anytime – even offline.
Text the download link to your phone
Standard text messaging rates apply

Fetal pillow - Mercer Medica

424

Published on

The Obstetric Malpractice Conference is only national conference for the prevention, management and defense of obstetric negligence claims. …

The Obstetric Malpractice Conference is only national conference for the prevention, management and defense of obstetric negligence claims.

For more information about the event, please visit: http://www.informa.com.au/obstetricmalpractice14

Published in: Health & Medicine
0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total Views
424
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
0
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
10
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

Report content
Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
No notes for slide

Transcript

  • 1. Obstetric Malpractice Conference 2014- Exhibitor DATE: Thursday, 26 JUNE 2014 New developments - Reducing complications associated with a deeply engaged head at caesarean section: a simple instrument KERRI BROCK EXECUTIVE MANAGER kbrock@mercermedical.com.au MOB: 0411 759 763 PETER DAWES AUSTRALIA MANAGER pdawes@mercermedical.com.au MOB: 0458 778 311
  • 2. New developments Reducing complications associated with a deeply engaged head at caesarean section: a simple instrument Authors Mandeep Singh / Rajiv Varma Key content: • There has been a disproportionate increase in caesarean section performed in the second stage of labour in the last few years. • Difficult delivery of the fetal head during caesarean section carries a higher risk of complications for both mother and baby. • The sentinel audit report published by the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists recommends a consultant presence when caesarean section is performed at full dilatation. Learning objectives: • The obstetrician needs to anticipate the possibility of difficult delivery of the fetal head during caesarean section. • Using an assistant to push the fetus can cause trauma,as the force required to push is uncontrolled. • The Foetal Disimpacting System® seems to be effective in elevating the fetal head when it is deeply engaged. Ethical issues: • There is a need for more data before the fetal disimpacting device is adopted in routine obstetric practice. • Use of this device when preparing for an emergency caesarean section,for instance in a situation of umbilical cord prolapse,might be justified. Keywords caesarean section / deeply engaged head / delivery complications / failed instrumental delivery / fetal disimpacting device Please cite this article as: Singh M,Varma R. Reducing complications associated with a deeply engaged head at caesarean section: a simple instrument. The Obstetrician & Gynaecologist 2008;10:xxx–xxx. Author details 1 New developments2008;10:xxx–xxx10.1576/toag.10.1.000.27000 www.rcog.org.uk/togonlineThe Obstetrician & Gynaecologist © 2008 Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists Mandeep Singh MB BS Clinical Fellow Southend Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Prittlewell Chase, Westcliff-on-Sea, Essex SS0 0RY, UK Rajiv Varma FRCOG Consultant Basildon University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Nethermayne, Basildon, Essex SS16 5NL, UK Email: rvarma99@aol.com (corresponding author) TOG10_1_07 11/28/07 10:02 PM Page 1
  • 3. Introduction The incidence of caesarean section has risen steadily in the last two decades: in most developed countries the incidence is now around 25%.The high rate of caesarean section is now regarded as a major public health problem.This concern is well placed,because it is likely that this upward trend will continue.1 The reasons for the increased rates are complex: safety of the operation leading to complacency, relative lack of skill in younger obstetricians,fear of litigation and pressure from the consumer have all been cited.There has been a disproportionate increase in caesarean section being performed in the second stage of labour in the last few years.2 Preferential use of ventouse,particularly the Kiwi™ OmniCup vacuum delivery system (Clinical Innovations Europe Ltd,Oxon,UK),over forceps delivery might also have played a role in the increase in caesarean section in the second stage, due to a significantly higher failure rate.3 Deeply engaged head at caesarean section The true incidence of a caesarean section with a deeply engaged head is unknown but it probably accounts for 25% of all emergency caesarean sections.Women who have had a failed instrumental delivery followed by caesarean section in late labour account for most of these cases.It may also be as a consequence of deep transverse arrest,arrest in the occipitoposterior position and unanticipated cephalopelvic disproportion late in labour.A relatively smaller number of caesarean sections in early labour and those performed electively might also occasionally have a deeply engaged head.Contributory factors are listed in Box 1. Caesarean section in late labour or at full dilatation with reduced liquor and an engaged fetal head is a difficult procedure and carries a higher risk of complications for both mother and baby.4,5 This is reflected in a high rate of extension of the uterine incision (a rate of up to 35% has been reported).6 The extensions occur due to excessive manipulation that might be required to deliver the fetal head when the lower uterine segment is already thin, oedematous and overstretched. This results in higher rates of major obstetric haemorrhage, injury to uterine vessels, trauma to the urinary tract and an increased length of hospital stay. The risks for the fetus include difficulty in delivering the fetal head,leading to delay between uterine incision and delivery in an already compromised fetus,and direct fetal trauma resulting from attempts at extracting a deeply engaged head from the pelvis,such as skull fractures,cephalhaematoma and subgaleal haematoma. Techniques described for the delivery of a deeply engaged head The difficulty in delivering the fetal head arises because of lack of space between the bony pelvis, pelvic soft tissues and the fetal head and the degree that the head has moulded into the pelvis.This lack of space makes it difficult for the surgeon to insert their hand to dislodge the fetal head from the pelvis.Several techniques have been reported in the literature for delivery of a deeply engaged head:7 • Use of an assistant to push up the fetal head vaginally when attempts to deliver abdominally have failed.It is important that the push is only applied when the uterus is not contracting.This may lead to a significant delay in uterine incision to delivery time.It can also be associated with direct fetal trauma due to uncontrolled force used by the assistant to dislodge the head from below. • Abdominovaginal delivery has been described by Landesman.8 The woman is placed in the Whitmore position9 (a modified lithotomy position where the thighs are moderately abducted and flexed to an angle of approximately 135 degrees relative to the trunk) and an assistant introduces their hand into the vagina to push the head up,the surgeon at the same time places an upward traction on the shoulders to help in dislodging the head. • Breech extraction can be achieved if a high transverse incision is made or a J-shaped extension is made to the normal lower segment incision.Extension of the incision is very common with this manoeuvre.Anticipating difficulty and making a vertical incision is the ideal course of action when attempting a breech extraction. • A prospective randomised trial reported by Fasubaa et al.suggested a lower risk of fetal and maternal injury when the fetus was delivered by pull method as compared to the push method.10 All these techniques rely on extensive experience that is often not immediately available on the labour ward.Caesarean sections are usually performed by the doctors in training who are unlikely to be experienced enough to deviate from the normal techniques of performing a caesarean section.The sentinel audit report published by the 2 New developments 2008;10:XXX–XXX The Obstetrician & Gynaecologist © 2008 Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists Box 1 Contributory factors to the increase in incidence of caesarean section with a deeply engaged head The device described in this article is manufactured by Safe Obstetric Systems UK Ltd (Essex, UK), which is owned by Rajiv Varma. While wewouldnotnormallyinclude an article which describes one manufacturer’s device alone, this section aims to highlight new developments in our practice and, as such, this device is showing a novel technique which has the potential to save lives. • Reluctance to resort to instrumental delivery, particularly rotational forceps, in the late second stage (greater use of caesarean section in situations where vaginal delivery can be safely undertaken). • Less stringent guidelines regarding the length of the second stage and increasing use of epidural analgesia, leading to a prolonged second stage. • Higher incidence of failure of instrumental delivery. TOG10_1_07 11/28/07 10:02 PM Page 2
  • 4. Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists recommended a consultant presence when caesarean section is performed at full dilatation.11 Anticipation of a difficult delivery at caesarean section is important.Failed instrumental delivery, occipitoposterior position,secondary arrest in labour and excessive moulding should alert the obstetrician to the possibility of this complication occurring.A careful abdominal palpation and bimanual examination to assess the engagement of head could further help to predict the difficulty in the delivery of fetus by caesarean section.The simple device shown in Figure 1,used in this situation prophylactically,could reduce some the complications associated with a deeply engaged head that can lead to serious maternal and fetal morbidity. It could also be used instead of an assistant to elevate the fetal head when attempts to delivery the head during caesarean section have failed. The Foetal Disimpacting System® is manufactured by Safe Obstetric Systems UK Ltd (Essex,UK).It consists of a base plate 11 cm long and 4.5 cm wide, foldable along the midline of the short axis towards the superior surface,to which a balloon is attached. The balloon is attached through a connector to a tube 80 cm in length that is in turn attached to a 60 ml syringe through a two-way connector. It is inserted vaginally below the fetal head at the time of inserting a Foley catheter or after a failed attempt at an instrumental delivery.Before insertion,the device is filled with 40 ml of normal saline.The saline is aspirated along with any air in the system then the device is ready for use (Figure 2). It is folded along its short axis and aligned so that the fold of the device is in the anteroposterior diameter of pelvis,and inserted using generous amount of obstetric cream (the process is no different from inserting a ventouse cup).Once in the vagina,the device is placed posteriorly,like a ventouse cup for an occipitoposterior position. Once inserted,the woman’s legs are straightened (this closes the vaginal opening and prevents the downward movement of the base plate) and she is prepared for caesarean section.The time taken for this manoeuvre is around 30 seconds.An assistant uses between 100–120 ml of saline to inflate the balloon using a syringe.The inflation is maintained only for a short time just before making the uterine incision and delivery of fetus. The base plate straightens and opens to become flat against the pelvic floor during the inflation process. The balloon inflates and gently elevates the fetal head 2–3 cm from its position,making it easier to deliver.As soon as the delivery is achieved,the balloon is deflated and can be removed after finishing the caesarean section: the device can be gently pulled out using the attached tubing or by hooking a finger into the base plate. We carried out a pilot study in 30 women in advanced labour with a deeply engaged head at the Institute of Obstetrics and Gynaecology and Government Hospital for Women and Children, Chennai,India.The indications for caesarean section are detailed in Table 1.Ethical approval was obtained and an informed consent was received from all the participants.The device was inserted in the manner described and ultrasound was used after the insertion and during the inflation to see the movement of fetal head.For the purpose of this study and to allow for scanning,the balloon was inflated before making the skin incision.Women requiring an urgent or emergency caesarean section were excluded from the trial. Ultrasonographic examination was performed transabdominally with the woman in a supine position.The fetal skull was identified with anterior and posterior tabula clearly depicted in the imaging plane.The ultrasound probe was held at a constant angle during the entire procedure by the operator and hard copies of images were taken.The device was inserted by an assistant and inflated with 120 ml of normal saline and the image seen at the 3 New developments2008;10:XXX–XXXThe Obstetrician & Gynaecologist © 2008 Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists 60 ml syringe and tubing Silicone balloon Folding base plate with rounded, atraumatic edges Figure 1 The Foetal Disimpacting System® Base plate folded along the hinges for insertion Figure 2 The Foetal Disimpacting System® ready for insertion Indication for caesarean section Women (n) 8–10 cm failed progress 6 Failed forceps delivery (midcavity) 3a Failed forceps delivery (rotational) 6 Failed ventouse delivery 12 Excessive moulding 3 a (2in the occipitoposterior position) Table 1 Indications for caesarean section in 30 women in advanced labour with a deeply engaged head TOG10_1_07 11/28/07 10:02 PM Page 3
  • 5. scan was printed.The two images were compared and change in position of fetal head was measured in centimetres using a ruler. A mean elevation of 3 cm was achieved with fluid volumes of 60–120 ml.There was no device expulsion and the fetal head was delivered with ease in all women.Both the vagina and fetal head were examined carefully after the caesarean section to look for trauma and none was seen. Conclusion The risks related to caesarean section in advanced labour are significant and this simple device seems to be effective.The initial experience is small but promising and further,larger trials are required. This device could also be used when cord prolapse has occurred,to elevate the fetal head and relieve the pressure on the cord before performing caesarean section.It could also have an application in and potentially increase the success rate of external cephalic version by lifting the breech from beneath.A prospective randomised trial of its use in caesarean section with a deeply engaged head is presently underway. References 1 Martin JA, Hamilton BE, Sutton PD,Ventura SJ, Menacker F, Munson ML. Births: final data for 2002. NatlVital Stat Rep 2003;52:1–113. 2 Spencer C, Murphy D, Bewley S. Caesarean delivery in the second stage of labour. BMJ 2006;333:613–4. doi:10.1136/bmj.38971.466979.DE 3 Groom KM, Jones BA, Miller N, Paterson-Brown S. A prospective randomised controlled trial of the Kiwi Omnicup versus conventional ventouse cup for vacuum-assisted vaginal delivery. BJOG 2006;113:183–9. doi:10.1111/j.1471-0528.2005.00834.x 4 Häger RM, Daltviet AK, Hofoss D, Nilson ST, Øian P, HenriksenT. Complications of cesarean deliveries: rates and risk factors. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2004;190:428–34. doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2003.08.037 5 Murphy DJ, Liebling RE,Verity L, Swingler R, Patel R. Early maternal and neonatal morbidity associated with operative delivery in second stage of labour: a cohort study. Lancet 2001;358:1203–7. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(01)06341-3 6 Rodriguez AI, Porter KB, O’Brien WF. Blunt versus sharp expansion of the uterine incision in low-segment transverse cesarean section. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1994;171:1022–5. 7 Blickstein I. Difficult delivery of the impacted fetal head during cesarean section: intraoperative disengagement dystocia. J Perinat Med 2004;32:465–9. doi:10.1515/JPM.2004.152 8 Landesman R, Graber EA. Abdominovaginal delivery: modification of the cesarean section operation to facilitate delivery of the impacted head. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1984;148:707–10. 9 Whitmore WF.Total Cystectomy. In: The Biology and Clinical Management of Bladder Cancer. Cooper EH, Williams RE, editors. London: Blackwell Scientific Publications; 1975. p. 193–228. 10 Fasubaa OB, Ezechi OC, Orji EO, Ogunniyi SO, Akindele ST, Loto OM et al. Delivery of the impacted head of fetus at caesarean section after prolonged obstructed labour: a randomised comparative study of two methods. J Obstet Gynaecol 2002;22:375–8. doi:10.1080/ 01443610220141290 11 Royal College of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. RCOG Clinical Effectiveness Support Unit. The National Sentinel Caesarean Section Audit Report. London; RCOG: 2001. www.rcog.org.uk/resources/ public/pdf/nscs_audit.pdf 4 New developments 2008;10:XXX–XXX The Obstetrician & Gynaecologist © 2008 Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists TOG10_1_07 11/28/07 10:02 PM Page 4
  • 6. Fetal Pillow A safe choice for a difficult Caesarean Section Steps for Use Hold the device by the wings between thumb and fingers and fold to squeeze the balloon between the two wings. The tube attachment should be at the superior end when the device is folded. Liberal amount of obstetric cream should be used for insertion. This process is very similar to inserting a silastic ventouse cup. After the delivery of baby the two-way tap can be opened to release the fluid. The device is easily removed by pulling on the tubing or hooking a finger on the plate and pulling the device out of the vagina. The device should be pushed posteriorly towards the coccyx. This position is similar to a posterior ventouse cup. The device is now lying on the anococcygeal ligament, this prevents any downward movement during inflation. The patient’s legs are now placed flat on the operating table. The device is now ready for inflation. Inflation should ideally be carried out after draping the patient for the Caesarean Section. Use 180mls of Sterile Saline with the 60mls syringe (THREE SYRINGES FULL) provided and close the tap so that no fluid escapes. Once inserted the device lies flat with the balloon surface in contact with the fetal head. STEP 4 Preparing for Inflation STEP 6 Removal STEP 2 Insertion This quick reference guide does not include all the information necessary for selection and use. Please see instructions for use for complete product and handling details. Contact details for new orders or any queries i.taylor@fetalpillow.com or www.fetalpillow.com © Safe Obstetrics Systems SAFE OBSTETRIC SYSTEMS LIMITED, a company incorporated and registered in England and Wales with a company number 05923369 whose registered office is at Berkeley Townsend, Hunter House, 150 Hutton Road, Shenfield, Brentwood, Essex, CM15 8NL. STEP 1 Preparation STEP 3 Positioning STEP 5 Inflation Fetal Pillow Instructions Poster G:Layout 1 3/11/11 09:55 Page 1
  • 7. Results RCT1from Contact SystemsObstetricsSafe©2012 www.fetalpillow.comori.taylor@fetalpillow.comqueriesanyorordersnewfordetails SAFE Berkeley 8NLCM15Essex,Brentwood,Shenfield, Road,Hutton150House,HunterTownsend,atisofficeregisteredwhose05923369numbercompany awithWalesandEnglandinregisteredandincorporatedcompanyaLIMITED,SYSTEMSOBSTETRIC 240 Controls)119andPillowFetal(121patient Fetal SectionCaesareanstage2ndin for babyandmotherboth outcomesinimprovementsignificantdeliversPillow 1. unpublished2013.trial.randomizedprospectiveA Pillow.FetalusingdilationfullatSectionCaesareanaincomplicationsReducingJ.MukherjiiP,KanrarA,DeR,TibriwalC,SBarmanS,Seal
  • 8. The Fetal Pillow (FP) : A Novel Intervention to Reduce Maternal and Fetal Complications in Caesarean Sections at Full Dilatation (CSFD) Mufti N. , Thomas T., Sircar S. Wishaw General Hospital, Scotland, ML2 ODP Introduction and Aim Conclusions Methods Results Figure 1- Patient Information and demographics: Figure 2- Labour Information: Figure 3 Continued - Caesarean Section Information: . Aim The prime aim of this audit is to establish whether or not elevating the fetal head prior to delivery using the Fetal Pillow reduces maternal and fetal trauma at caesarean sections at full dilatation (CSFD). Introduction There is now evidence that CSFD carries much higher morbidity for both mother and the baby. There is a higher incidence of uterine incision extensions, post partum haemorrhage, increased operating time, increased maternal blood transfusion, ITU admission and increased length of hospital stay for the mother. For the baby, there is a higher risk of admission to NICU and birth injury These often occur as a result of the increased manipulation required for delivery of the head due to reduced liquor, thin overstretched and oedematous lower segment, excessive caput and moulding, and the often deeply engaged head What is the Fetal Pillow? The FP is a silicone balloon that is inserted vaginally under the fetal head prior to performing a CSFD. After insertion the balloon is inflated using 180mls of sterile saline. The balloon inflates causing a 3-4 cm upward displacement of the fetal head. This makes the delivery of the head easier with minimal manipulation. This allows the surgeon to site the uterine incision higher on a wider and thicker part of the lower segment. Figure 3- Caesarean Section Information: Figure 4 – Maternal And Fetal Complications Demographics Fetal Pillow CSFD Gestation (avg.) 39+9 weeks 40+1 weeks Patient age (avg.) 31 years 28 years BMI (avg.) 29 26 Fetal weight (avg.) 3777 3624 Average First Stage Duration (hrs) 8 10 Average Second Stage Duration (hrs) 4 5 Parity 0 (%) 63 72 Parity 1 (%) 25 22 Parity 2 (%) 12 6 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 Fetal Pillow CSFD Trial of Instrumental Delivery Yes No 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 Above spines At spines Below spines Station Fetal Pillow CSFD 45.8 70 4.7 3.4 Fetal Pillow CSFD Operating Times Average operating time (Min) Average incision to delivery time (Min) Literature Search Pro Forma Forms Developed. Inclusion Criteria were singleton term pregnancy requiring CS at full dilatation. Forms given to surgeons to fill in after each use of FP – 16 forms collected and analysed. 18 cases of CSFD without FP use were analysed to compare. 698 829 Fetal Pillow CSFD Average Blood loss (mls) 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Very difficult Difficult Not difficult Easy Very easy Delivery Of Fetal Head Delivery of Fetal Head Fetal Pillow Delivery of Fetal Head CSFD 1) The results are very encouraging to assess the routine use of Fetal Pillow in CSFD 2) In the FP group there was reduction in time taken for the procedure, and blood loss at procedure. 3) There were no maternal temperature > 38, no intra-operative trauma, no need for transfusions, and no maternal admissions to HDU 4) Further comparison study showing complications of CSFD without FP in the same unit would be useful to see if there is any significance. Maternal Complications Fetal Complications CSFD FP CSFD FP  2 patients received blood transfusions  1 patient required re- admission  3 patients in the CSFD group had maternal pyrexia > 38  1 patient required HDU admission  1 had bladder wall damage repaired during procedure No maternal complicat ions Two babies from the CSFD group required admission for IV Abx, and stayed for an avg of 3 days. Two babies from the FP required admission for IV Abx, for only one day References 1)McKelvey A, Ashe R, McKenna D, Roberts R. Caesarean section in the second stage of labour; A retrospective review of obstetric setting and morbidity. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. April 2010;30(3):264-267 2)Seal S et al. Does Elevating the Fetal Head Prior to Delivery using Fetal Pillow Reduce Complications in a Full Dilation Ceasaran Section? A prospective study with historic controls.

×