Your SlideShare is downloading. ×
0
Jamie reid
Jamie reid
Jamie reid
Jamie reid
Jamie reid
Jamie reid
Jamie reid
Jamie reid
Jamie reid
Jamie reid
Jamie reid
Jamie reid
Jamie reid
Jamie reid
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×

Thanks for flagging this SlideShare!

Oops! An error has occurred.

×
Saving this for later? Get the SlideShare app to save on your phone or tablet. Read anywhere, anytime – even offline.
Text the download link to your phone
Standard text messaging rates apply
0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total Views
107
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
0
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
2
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

Report content
Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
No notes for slide

Transcript

  • 1. © 2013 FinityConsultingPty Limited Risk Equalisation: Can We Do Better? Health Insurance Summit – July 2013 Jamie Reid – Finity Actuaries and Consultants
  • 2. Risk Equalisation – Can We Do Better? Why is risk equalisation important? Current System: What works and what doesn’t? Options for change 2
  • 3. Ever present and ever changing 3
  • 4. 0 200 400 600 800 1,000 1,200 1,400 $millions Age Premiums Claims (Before Risk Eq) Community Rating Requires Risk Equalisation 4 Subsidy Source: Finity analysis of PHIAC data, year ending June 2012
  • 5. Cost Differences By Age Largely Eliminated 5 Source: Finity analysis of PHIAC data, year ending June 2012 0 200 400 600 800 1,000 1,200 1,400 $millions Age Premiums Claims (After Risk Eq)
  • 6. More than 40% of claim costs are shared 6 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 %ofClaimsEqualised Claims($bn) Year Ending June Hospital Claims Paid Claims subject to risk equalisation Risk equalisation % New RE arrangements Lifetime health cover introduced New RE arrangements Source: Finity analysis of PHIAC data, various years
  • 7. More Than Half of Claim Costs Shared by 2020 7 30% 35% 40% 45% 50% 55% 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014F 2016F 2018F 2020F %ofClaimsEqualised Year Ending 30 June Historical maximum: 46% (1994) High Low Source: PHIAC data, Finity projections
  • 8. What works and what doesn’t work? 8 + Age cost differences removed + Fairly simple and well- understood - Other cost differences remains - Insurers share efficiency gains - Affordability challenge for under 65s
  • 9. Options for Change New System •Risk based capitation Change Current System •High cost claim pool •Encourage younger joiners •Capping growth 9
  • 10. Risk Based Capitation Based on expected rather than actual claim costs Insurer incentive to control actual costs Increased complexity Netherlands provides a case study No appetite for Australian RBC in 2003 10
  • 11. High Cost Claims Pool (HCCP) Covers claims above $50,000 While claim costs increase each year, threshold has not changed If HCCP remains then threshold should be indexed 11 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013F 2014F 2015F 2016F 2017F 2018F 2019F 2020F HCCP($m) Year Ending 30 June
  • 12. Encourage Younger Joiners 12 0 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 5,000 6,000 $perperson Age Premium Claims (Before Risk Eq) Subsidy
  • 13. Conclusion Risk equalisation systems don’t last forever - change is inevitable Life of the current system can be increased HCCP changes look like an easy win RBC should remain under active consideration in Australia Making changes sooner rather than later allows any adverse impacts to be addressed 13
  • 14. Contact Jamie Reid Tel: +61 2 8252 3309 Mobile: +61 4 3756 2290 Jamie.Reid@finity.com.au

×