Your SlideShare is downloading. ×
0
Landgren Holm Akramy & Wiberg - Does it make any difference? An impact evaluation of the libraries educational activities at Lund University, Sweden
Landgren Holm Akramy & Wiberg - Does it make any difference? An impact evaluation of the libraries educational activities at Lund University, Sweden
Landgren Holm Akramy & Wiberg - Does it make any difference? An impact evaluation of the libraries educational activities at Lund University, Sweden
Landgren Holm Akramy & Wiberg - Does it make any difference? An impact evaluation of the libraries educational activities at Lund University, Sweden
Landgren Holm Akramy & Wiberg - Does it make any difference? An impact evaluation of the libraries educational activities at Lund University, Sweden
Landgren Holm Akramy & Wiberg - Does it make any difference? An impact evaluation of the libraries educational activities at Lund University, Sweden
Landgren Holm Akramy & Wiberg - Does it make any difference? An impact evaluation of the libraries educational activities at Lund University, Sweden
Landgren Holm Akramy & Wiberg - Does it make any difference? An impact evaluation of the libraries educational activities at Lund University, Sweden
Landgren Holm Akramy & Wiberg - Does it make any difference? An impact evaluation of the libraries educational activities at Lund University, Sweden
Landgren Holm Akramy & Wiberg - Does it make any difference? An impact evaluation of the libraries educational activities at Lund University, Sweden
Landgren Holm Akramy & Wiberg - Does it make any difference? An impact evaluation of the libraries educational activities at Lund University, Sweden
Landgren Holm Akramy & Wiberg - Does it make any difference? An impact evaluation of the libraries educational activities at Lund University, Sweden
Landgren Holm Akramy & Wiberg - Does it make any difference? An impact evaluation of the libraries educational activities at Lund University, Sweden
Landgren Holm Akramy & Wiberg - Does it make any difference? An impact evaluation of the libraries educational activities at Lund University, Sweden
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×

Thanks for flagging this SlideShare!

Oops! An error has occurred.

×
Saving this for later? Get the SlideShare app to save on your phone or tablet. Read anywhere, anytime – even offline.
Text the download link to your phone
Standard text messaging rates apply

Landgren Holm Akramy & Wiberg - Does it make any difference? An impact evaluation of the libraries educational activities at Lund University, Sweden

467

Published on

Published in: Education
0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total Views
467
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
0
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
2
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

Report content
Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
No notes for slide

Transcript

  • 1. Does it make any difference? An impact evaluation of thelibraries’ user education at Lund University, Sweden
  • 2. The next 15 minutes will deal with• our project – and its methods• the results – but also • some added values – and finally • where we stand today LILAC 2012   Akramy/Holm/Landgren/Wiberg
  • 3. • Sara Akramy, Bitte Holm, Lena Landgren & Anna Wiberg• Lund University Libraries Faculty Faculty library library Faculty library Faculty library University  Library library Faculty LILAC 2012   Akramy/Holm/Landgren/Wiberg
  • 4. Why & HowWhy? How?‐ Evaluate the libraries’ user  ‐ 3 faculties and University Library education ‐ Spring 2011‐ Increase quality ‐ Focus group interviews‐ Find out what are the ”factors” ‐ Collecting data that make a difference ‐ Model by Sharon Markless and  David Streatfield (Evaluating the  impact of your library, 2006) LILAC 2012   Akramy/Holm/Landgren/Wiberg
  • 5. ObjectiveStudents can independently find sources that are relevant to their assignments LILAC 2012   Akramy/Holm/Landgren/Wiberg
  • 6. Markless’ & Streatfield’s model e.g. Students feel  an increased  Students can independently find sources that confidence in  are relevant to their assignments their own ability to  search for  information e.g. Librarians are  involved in the  planning of the  teaching at  departments e.g.  ‐number of  teaching librarians e.g. Creating  learning  ‐pedagogical  outcomes for libraries’ method user education LILAC 2012   Akramy/Holm/Landgren/Wiberg
  • 7. Results• Learning and students’ thoughts and experiences• Learning outcomes• Pedagogical methods• Information literacy• The liability issue of information literacy• Contact and integration of library’s user education LILAC 2012   Akramy/Holm/Landgren/Wiberg
  • 8. Some factors that might make a difference• Library user education is relevant and timely • Library user education is integrated in courses throughout the curriculum• Library strives to meet students’ diversity • Education provides opportunities to practice information literacy• Librarians’ pedagogical competence• Library user education should have the same conditions regarding learning  outcomes and examination as other education• The pedagogical method• Students and teachers are aware of the importance of information literacy• The liability issue of information literacy: Who is responsible for students’ development of information literacy?• Organization and information channels ‐ cooperation and dialogue between  teachers and librarians LILAC 2012   Akramy/Holm/Landgren/Wiberg
  • 9. Added values LILAC 2012   Akramy/Holm/Landgren/Wiberg
  • 10. Where we are today• A meeting in February with our library managers to ensure  next step of the evaluation• Keep the way we worked during step 1, but with some time  saving changes• Changes in the environment LILAC 2012   Akramy/Holm/Landgren/Wiberg
  • 11. Markless’ & Streatfield’s model LILAC 2012   Akramy/Holm/Landgren/Wiberg
  • 12. Next steps• Formulate targets for each faculty library based on  the information gained from the study• Plan activities to  be implemented autumn 2012 ‐ spring 2013• Re‐evaluation spring 2014 LILAC 2012   Akramy/Holm/Landgren/Wiberg
  • 13. So, will we prove we make a difference?• Things to consider – Actions taken by the library – Changes in the environment • Together we make a difference! LILAC 2012   Akramy/Holm/Landgren/Wiberg
  • 14. Thanks! Sara Akramy, Medical Faculty Library sara.akramy@med.lu.seBitte Holm, Library of School of Economics & Management bitte.holm@ehl.lu.se Lena Landgren, University Library lena.landgren@lub.lu.se Anna Wiberg, Faculty of Law Library anna.wiberg@jur.lu.se LILAC 2012   Akramy/Holm/Landgren/Wiberg

×