Your SlideShare is downloading. ×
MRC/info4africa KZN Community Forum | July 2014 | Youth Sexualities | Mz Kerry Frizelle
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5

Thanks for flagging this SlideShare!

Oops! An error has occurred.

Saving this for later? Get the SlideShare app to save on your phone or tablet. Read anywhere, anytime – even offline.
Text the download link to your phone
Standard text messaging rates apply

MRC/info4africa KZN Community Forum | July 2014 | Youth Sexualities | Mz Kerry Frizelle


Published on

Kerry Frizelle, Counselling Psychologist and Psychology Lecturer at the University of KwaZulu-Natal presented on “Vulnerable Sexualities” at the July 2014 MRC/info4africa KZN Community Forum. …

Kerry Frizelle, Counselling Psychologist and Psychology Lecturer at the University of KwaZulu-Natal presented on “Vulnerable Sexualities” at the July 2014 MRC/info4africa KZN Community Forum.
Kerry’s presentation showcased the findings of a research survey conducted by two Psychology Honours students, Olwethu Jili and Khanyisile Nene, under her supervision. By critically analysing media reports that highlighted youth sexuality, Kerry and her students uncovered a variety of assumptions and underpinning principles that negatively portrayed youth sexuality in South African newspapers that are aimed at an adult readership.

Published in: Health & Medicine, Education
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Total Views
On Slideshare
From Embeds
Number of Embeds
Embeds 0
No embeds

Report content
Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

No notes for slide


  • 1. Vulnerable Sexualities Kerry Frizelle UKZN
  • 2. Background HSRC 2014 • In 2012 1.2% population HIV positive (6.4 million). • 15-24 – Incidence: 139 000 (male 26, 000, female 113,000) • HIV incidence has declined in 15-24 age group • 2.8%: 2002-2005 – 2.3%: 2005-2008 – 1.5 2008-2012 • Significantly higher percentage (58.4%) of condom use than other age groups. • However, condom use across age groups reduced. • 15-24 more likely to believe at risk, and more knowledgeable about transmission and prevention. • However, overall, only 26.8% had accurate knowledge. • 62.2% HIV positive males and 45% positive males are not aware of their status.
  • 3. Our study • 1980’s social research – based on taken for granted assumptions about youth as ‘high risk’. • South African materials – turbulent transition from adolescence to adulthood. • View youth as ‘innocence’ = prohibiting, banning, punishing. • Paternalistic, patronising programmes – child hostile. • My role as a lecturer ‘disrupt’ and ‘trouble’ these ideas. • Examine ‘historically imagined’ assumptions. • Make youth differently visible. • Anyone working with youth.
  • 4. Childhood, youth and sexuality • Law extended childhood in Africa to age of 18 – a period of immaturity warranting differential treatment. • Innocent and in need of protection. • Global standards has portrayed all youth as dependent, immature, incapable of assuming responsibility. • Protectionist stance. • Sexual socialisation within the South African context – not always as it is now. • Psychology – ‘storm and stress’ model of youth.
  • 5. Newspaper Articles • How are these ideas (re)produced in newspaper articles targeted at adults? • Grand narrative – or a dominant story – of negative and problematic youth sexuality. • What ‘sub-stories’ are activated in the articles?
  • 6. Legal/Criminal Discourse • Either a perpetrator of a sexual crime or a victim of a sexual crime. • What is rendered invisible is the possibility of a consensual, pleasurable and active sexuality. • Research shows youth are having sex as young as 15 – not all victims. • Youth sexuality only acknowledged when framed as a crime. • Protectionist stance – future sexual subjects – prepared to avoid risk. • Adolescent sexuality is equated with violence. • Danger and disease. • Female youth sexuality = a moment of victimisation. • Do not acknowledge the complexity of sexuality – negative and positive.
  • 7. Developmental/Transitional • Youth are represented as being primarily experimental, explorative and driven by internal developmental forces. • Sex-crazed – raging hormones – unable to control their behaviour that is driven by biology, bodily changes and/or peer pressure. • Inherently chaotic, out of control, easily influenced and hyper- sexual,
  • 8. Gendered discourse • Females feature more than males - teenage pregnancy is a female problem. • Female youth are represented as sexually immoral – male sexuality normalised. • It is female youth who are more often explicitly and implicitly reported as being sexual victims. • Pregnancy = abuse • Woman binary – either sexually immoral or victims. • Missing discourse of desire and agency. • Males are the perpetrators. • Almost exclusively heterosexual.
  • 9. Parental discourse • On one hand they are positioned as adults who are ultimately responsible for guiding and monitoring. • On other hand the are seen as failures and to blame. • Primarily working or unemployed parents who are represented as unavailable, permissive and irresponsible. • Low and middle income youth more likely to be sexually active than higher income.
  • 10. Racial Discourse • Although racial category ‘black’ is not used, reference to particular geographical spaces, surveys and visual representations suggest black children’s behaviour particularly problematic. • Black youth sexuality is foregrounded and seen as a problem, while white sexuality remains hidden and normalised. • Interventions for black youth.
  • 11. Expert Discourse • Full of references to experts. • Professionals become the ultimate experts and regulators of youth sexuality because of the ‘failings’ of women. • Youth seen as irresponsible and incapable of contributing.
  • 12. Scientific Discourse • Serves to verify the problematic nature of youth sexuality as scientific using statistical evidence. • Using statistics means that you can claim something is a ‘truth’. • Claims about a problematic youth sexuality become difficult to question in the face of scientific evidence. • Surveys are a sight of a close surveillance and control – where lives and relationships of youth are closely monitored and controlled. • 1980’s research – while data to confirm high risk behaviour – the data that showed they were making healthy decisions overlooked. • Youth remain marginalised.
  • 13. So… • South African youth sexuality is constructed as problematic. • Active (black) youth (hetero)sexuality is authoritatively rendered problematic, inherently out of control and in need of the intervention of experts and professionals. • Risk focused interventions. • Unless we challenge sexist, classist and racist notions of sexuality we will fail to empower youth. • Missing discourse of desire. • We need to read our textual worlds more critically and examine our often ‘imagined’ fears.