Your SlideShare is downloading. ×
School library as a heterotopic place / Béatrice Micheau
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5

Thanks for flagging this SlideShare!

Oops! An error has occurred.

Saving this for later? Get the SlideShare app to save on your phone or tablet. Read anywhere, anytime – even offline.
Text the download link to your phone
Standard text messaging rates apply

School library as a heterotopic place / Béatrice Micheau


Published on

II Konferencja Naukowa : Nauka o informacji (informacja naukowa) w okresie zmian, Warszawa, 15-16.04.2013 r. Instytut Informacji Naukowej i Studiów Bibliologicznych, Uniwersytet Warszawski …

II Konferencja Naukowa : Nauka o informacji (informacja naukowa) w okresie zmian, Warszawa, 15-16.04.2013 r. Instytut Informacji Naukowej i Studiów Bibliologicznych, Uniwersytet Warszawski

The 2nd Scientific Conference : Information Science in an Age of Change, April 15-16, 2013. Institute of Information and Book Studies, University of Warsaw

Published in: Education

  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Total Views
On Slideshare
From Embeds
Number of Embeds
Embeds 0
No embeds

Report content
Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

No notes for slide


  • 1. School library as a heterotopic placeBéatrice MicheauLaboratoire GERiiCOUniversité de Lille 3
  • 2. INTRODUCTIONPhD on information practices of teenagersin the north of FranceThree main different spaces of informationpractices : classroom, school library, homeTeenagers day lifeInformal and informal practices at the crossingof these three spaces
  • 3. INTRODUCTIONThese three spaces influence pupil’s information practices withoutdetermining them unequivocally and mechanisticallyproduction, circulation and reception of documents and thus to thebuilding of an information culture, within an anthropological meaning(Goody 1979, Olson 2010).« Information Literacy » as « a set of knowledge and skills shared in acommunity which allow to situate, to locate, to qualify, to treat and tocommunicate relevant information”(Béguin-Verbrugge et Kovacs,2011)
  • 4. INTRODUCTIONunderstanding the links between information practices andsocial spaces of document would make explicit the role ofthe practice places (De Certeau, 1990) in the building ofinformation literacy (Maury, 2011)− classroom, school library and home are the three mainspaces where are built pupil’s information literacy, bydifferent modes of production and circulation of documents.− school library as a practice place whose location andoperation would make him a heterotopic place as definedby Michel Foucault (Foucault, 2001)− Ethnic-semiotic approach
  • 5. INTRODUCTIONinformation literacy as the result of interbreeding andcontradictions between three cultures / info-documentary areas:the disciplinary culture of the classroom, the libraryheterogeneous culture and the family culture at homeschool library is an in-between, a frontier
  • 6. FRAMEWORKinformal info-documentary practices of studentsforms of document authorityethnographic method of observation and datacollectionThe notion of informal practice overlaps with that ofthe ordinary practiceReport to the rules, the standards
  • 7. FRAMEWORKMichel de Certeauthe concept of informal practice refers to waysof doing things, to be effective, to escape/toavoid power relations (symbolic or not), relatedto a system or an order, and in particular byusing diversion practiceshow pupils try to avoid or to play with thedisciplinary and / or documentary order in theirinformation practicesDestabilization on the Internet
  • 8. FRAMEWORKvalidate (affix a value to) documents or documentfragments on the Interneta contradictory notion: the informal practices ofvalidation, prioritization of documentsthe document as text registration and definition of textgenrethe relationship between prescription (standard) andpractices in the definition of information literacydocument is understood in a broad sense as any unitof meaning, text fragment, multimedia registration,recorded signification
  • 9. FRAMEWORKstandardized signs of identification and separation of textsas a source of qualification or disqualification ofdocuments (semiotic)two scientific issues:− the definition of document as text registration− the links between information literacy standards andformal and informal practices.==> an anthropological notion: the notion of space.==> how a document space is transformed into a documentplace.
  • 10. Documents as text spacesAnalyzing document spaces is questioning thenotion of document as− text crystallization,− deferred act of communicationDocument organizes the elements of cognitionor re-cognition of the textsthe researcher-reader wants to collect, identifysigns of identity, classification, validation ofencountered documents or documentfragments.
  • 11. Documents as text spacesDocument overflows normally the text byformalizing signs of identity and authority oftextsAuthor function : Michel Foucault and RogerChartier«Author » as a text function is primarily afunction of separation which allows texts toemerge and crystallize, formalize andinstitutionalize discursive formations
  • 12. Documents as text spacesThe document spatial arrangement of text andknowledge spaces (class, school library), are in thesame time− a mediation place of the texts,− a material inscription of texts− a formalization of signals and signs denoting orconnoting authorities of the text (author, publisher,genre of discourse).
  • 13. Document as text spacesCollecting books in a library affixes their documentaryvalue.Organizing documents in classification schemes, it is away to build a documentary landscape.Bringing documents in the class room is a way tolegitimate their use in the academic discipline.document legitimacy by their collection haven’t thesame meaning according to different places in theschool.
  • 14. Documents as text sapcesInformation literacy : not only good practices to useinformation systemInformation literacy : skills and knowledge necessaryto search, find, locate, classify the documents ordocumentary fragmentsanthropological construction of documentary valueWrite culture :Jack Goody and David R. OlsonAn anthropological approach requires understandingthe document’s circulation spaces as symbolic placesand co-constructing agents of info-documentaryculture
  • 15. Information literacy betweenstandards and practicesAcquiring, manufacturing, grouping, prohibitingdocuments and document practices contributeto the building of an information culture/literacy.Staging, putting into space, making visible(mediating) and thus excluding, hiding,forbidding documents and document practicesinvolve also the acquisition of an informationliteracy/culture.Consider spaces as implicit or explicitdocument standards involve an info-documentary learning.
  • 16. Information literacy betweenstandards and practicestext separation practice embodied by adynamic between− the document signs and forms (especially inthe physical space of the classroom andlibrary school) and− document uses,− adjustment practices,− misuses of disciplinary and / or documentaryorder.
  • 17. Information literacy betweenstandards and practicesThe building of informal information practices isthe result of the confrontation between− the more or less explicit teacher’s orlibrarian’s discourses,− the demands of their discipline in informationquality and text authority− family information practices of the pupils
  • 18. Method and contextEthnographic methodObservations of class rooms, courses, liibraryschoolCollecting data, texts, documents...Semi-directive interviews with teachers,librarian and pupilsEthno-semiotic approach (Le Marec, Jeanneret)Ecological approach (Bronfenbrenner, Bateson)
  • 19. Proxemy of spaces in the secondaryschoolSpace as artefactnot only material but also symbolic, a humanbeing extension whose sense analyses hasbeen formulated in the concept of “proxemy” byStuart Hall (Hall, 1971)A “proxemic” analysis of document spaces− how school library, over-meaning space, stronglyorganized, panoptic landscape of the documentcollection (Jacob et Baratin 1996) could also beparadoxically considered as a “semi-fixed” space: aspace where distance and link rules betweenhuman beings and/or objects are less restrictive
  • 20. Proxemy of spacesClassroom = a disciplinary and “fixed” spacewhere material features and hidden structuresare very restrictive and that organizes individualsegregation (a “sociofugal” space)− pedagogical simultaneity,− magisterial authority,− disciplinary overseeing− school supervision==> text and document production and circulationare subjects to the constraints of the curriculumand to the magisterial power
  • 21. Proxemy of spacesthe strongly oriented and segregated space of classroom,other documents than the purely school documents havea little placeTextbooks, incarnations of the program are the maindocuments present even in the form of fragmentsrecomposed through teachers handouts.the filter of the textbook or of the teacher.Subject to the magisterial authority, the requirements ofthe programs, documents and their visible aspectsdisappear.Lost of their editorial enunciation
  • 22. Proxemy of spacesIn conflict with this space, library school promotesconnections between students themselves, betweenstudents and the teacher-librarian, between studentsand documentary objectsFragmented into differentiated subspaces, schoollibrary presents to students− a paradoxical place− where the power of the library is unfolded− and the authority of scholarship is diluted, in thesame time
  • 23. School library as a circulation space : aheterotopiaSchool library is a circulation space, a place ofpassages (Jeanneret 2008) where documentsand info-documentary practices,heterogeneous and heterodox learning formsare confrontedSemi-public space (Maury 2011°Open space but also over-meaning andhierarchical space− Effective and real place of a post-modern school utopia ofpupil’s empowerment and culture sharing, school librarycould be characterized as a heterotopic place as definedby Michel Foucault (Foucault, 2001a): a deviation placewished but rejected by school institution
  • 24. School library as a circulation space : aheterotopiaFoucaulttwo types of significant spaces : utopias andheterotopiasUtopias are locations which have with society a reportof analogy, reversed or not reversedHeterotopias are the real locations, the spaces whichbecome places, places shaped by the institution butwhich have more or other symbolic significations thanthe common significations of the institution, like“utopias really effective”principles
  • 25. School library as a circulation space : aheterotopiaprinciplesvarious heterotopiaseach society uses heterotopias in different waysthe capacity of heterotopias of juxtaposing different sub-areasheterotopias are also heterochroniasHeterotopias :places of different useHeterotopias : places of normal use
  • 26. ConclusionSchool library is finally a place− between formal and informal practices,− between legitimated knowledge and ordinarycreativity,− between teacher’s uttering and pupil’s tactics(De Certeau 1990).School library is a place which questions theprofessional identity of the librarian-teacher