Your SlideShare is downloading. ×
Joint families more likely to own homes
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×

Thanks for flagging this SlideShare!

Oops! An error has occurred.

×
Saving this for later? Get the SlideShare app to save on your phone or tablet. Read anywhere, anytime – even offline.
Text the download link to your phone
Standard text messaging rates apply

Joint families more likely to own homes

763
views

Published on

Accommodation can be classified into three categories—owned houses, rented houses and houses typically provided by employers. While home ownership is one of the main aims of household savings, almost …

Accommodation can be classified into three categories—owned houses, rented houses and houses typically provided by employers. While home ownership is one of the main aims of household savings, almost one-third of Indian urban households live in rented accommodations. Not owning a house because of financial reasons is just one of the reasons for living in rented accommodation. People could also do so because of work, proximity to facilities such as education, hospitals, etc.

However, across the five main consumer segments, a larger share of households live in their own homes in the more affluent segments, while almost 10% of the lowest income segment live in accommodation that is classified as neither owned nor rented, pointing to the type of work and occupations of the socio-economic category (SEC) E segment.

The richest SEC A segment, that has the highest share of households earning—more than Rs. 10 lakh a year—finds it the easiest to purchase homes. At the other end of the spectrum, the poorest SEC E households, with the highest share earning less than Rs. 3 lakh a year, have less than 60% living in their own homes. While this trend works across the country, northern states have a slightly higher share of households living in their own homes.

Also See House Ownership Trends (PDF)

In SEC D and SEC E segments, more than 60% of the households live in their own homes in the northern states. This could reflect in part the lower home values in towns of the north. It could also reflect the trend of people migrating from these states to other regions, who may choose to live in rented accommodation.

Looking at the share of households in owned accommodation, Delhi, Pune, Coimbatore, Madurai, Ludhiana, Chennai, Hyderabad, Bangalore, Mumbai and Kolkata rank at the bottom in the SEC E segment. Even in the SEC A segment, there are many who live in rented accommodation because of work reasons—cities such as Hyderabad, Bangalore, Chennai and Kolkata have less than 60% living in their own homes in this segment.

Once again, finer segmentation of urban consumers gives more insights. The highest share of households living in their own homes—more than 80%—are found in two segments, both whose chief wage earners are in their mature years. In the affluent category, this is the richest segment in urban India—households whose chief wage earners are well educated, businessmen, executives or professionals, married and living in joint families with their grown up married children.

Next to these households, from the less affluent category, comes the fifth largest consumer segment in urban India comprising households whose chief wage earners are school educated businessmen or skilled workers, married with grown-up, married children. It is by this stage in life that the chief wage earners are settled in one location and have saved enough to live in their own homes.

The segment with the highest share of households living in quarters that are neither owned nor rented has chief wage earners with the lowest education and skill sets, single and living alone in the cities. This group is the tenth largest in size in urban India and comprises mostly those with regular salaried jobs, accommodation seems to be one of the benefits given by employers.

The segment which has the highest share of households living in rented accommodation—more than 75%—comprises those whose chief wage earners are young, single, graduate professionals or skilled workers. Clearly, the single status is the dominant characteristic influencing the decision to live in rented houses, even as they put money aside for owning a home once the chief wage earner is more settled. In fact, those households who are living in joint families are more likely to be living in owned homes, than nuclear families.

Published in: Business

0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total Views
763
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
1
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
8
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

Report content
Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
No notes for slide

Transcript

  • 1. Published: Mint dated 20th June, 2011The heterogeneitythat characterizesthe modern Indianconsumer hascreated a mazethat marketerswould like tounravel in order totarget theirproducts andservices precisely.In this fortnightlyseries, IndicusAnalytics willpresent the variousfacets of urbanconsumers, acrossgeographies andsocio-economicgroups Indicus Consumer Data Products
  • 2. Accommodation can be classified into three categories—owned houses, rentedhouses and houses typically provided by employers. While home ownership is oneof the main aims of household savings, almost one-third of Indian urbanhouseholds live in rented accommodations. Not owning a house because offinancial reasons is just one of the reasons for living in rented accommodation.People could also do so because of work, proximity to facilities such as education,hospitals, etc. However, across the five main consumer segments, a larger shareof households live in their own homes in the more affluent segments, while almost10% of the lowest income segment live in accommodation that is classified asneither owned nor rented, pointing to the type of work and occupations of thesocio-economic category (SEC) E segment.
  • 3. The richest SEC A segment, that has the highest share of households earning—more than Rs. 10 lakh a year—finds it the easiest to purchase homes. At the otherend of the spectrum, the poorest SEC E households, with the highest share earningless than Rs. 3 lakh a year, have less than 60% living in their own homes. While thistrend works across the country, northern states have a slightly higher share ofhouseholds living in their own homes.In SEC D and SEC E segments, more than60% of the households live in their own homes in the northern states. This couldreflect in part the lower home values in towns of the north. It could also reflect thetrend of people migrating from these states to other regions, who may choose to livein rented accommodation.
  • 4. Looking at the share of households in owned accommodation, Delhi, Pune,Coimbatore, Madurai, Ludhiana, Chennai, Hyderabad, Bangalore, Mumbai andKolkata rank at the bottom in the SEC E segment. Even in the SEC A segment, thereare many who live in rented accommodation because of work reasons—cities suchas Hyderabad, Bangalore, Chennai and Kolkata have less than 60% living in theirown homes in this segment. Once again, finer segmentation of urban consumersgives more insights. The highest share of households living in their own homes—more than 80%—are found in two segments, both whose chief wage earners are intheir mature years. In the affluent category, this is the richest segment in urbanIndia—households whose chief wage earners are well educated, businessmen,executives or professionals, married and living in joint families with their grown upmarried children.
  • 5. Next to these households, from the less affluent category,comes the fifth largest consumer segment in urban Indiacomprising households whose chief wage earners areschool educated businessmen or skilled workers, marriedwith grown-up, married children. It is by this stage in lifethat the chief wage earners are settled in one location andhave saved enough to live in their own homes. Thesegment with the highest share of households living inquarters that are neither owned nor rented has chief wageearners with the lowest education and skill sets, single andliving alone in the cities. This group is the tenth largest insize in urban India and comprises mostly those withregular salaried jobs, accommodation seems to be one ofthe benefits given by employers. The segment which hasthe highest share of households living in rentedaccommodation—more than 75%—comprises thosewhose chief wage earners are young, single, graduateprofessionals or skilled workers. Clearly, the single statusis the dominant characteristic influencing the decision tolive in rented houses, even as they put money aside forowning a home once the chief wage earner is moresettled. In fact, those households who are living in jointfamilies are more likely to be living in owned homes, thannuclear families.

×