Best companies to work for 2010 11
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×
 

Best companies to work for 2010 11

on

  • 2,668 views

How We Did It...

How We Did It

Source: Business Today http://businesstoday.intoday.in/bt/story/how-we-did-it/1/12518.html

Issue Dated January 18, 2011

Ten is a significant age for a survey. Business Today's annual exercise of finding The Best Companies to Work For turns 10 with this edition. After completely overhauling the methodology in the summer of 2009 to make it "by the employee and of the employee", we have tried to fine-tune it further this year. So, along with our survey and knowledge partners, we tried to capture not just the overall ranking of 25 companies and a sector ranking of 10 each for nine sectors but also the human resource facets of the Indian workplace.

Critical views from the employee universe, too, were captured in some detail. For instance: What factors do employees consider important in a workplace? What makes a company attractive to its employees? What demoralises them? What upsets them enough to make them contemplate a job change? Are they satisfied in their current role? If not, what can organisations do to address the factors they are dissatisfied with? Do they believe the senior management of the company adheres to ethical values? Read the answers elsewhere in this cover story package.



We partnered with Indicus Analytics for designing and conducting the survey. For helping us interpret the results, we partnered with PeopleStrong, an hr consultancy firm. First things first. The BT-Indicus Analytics-PeopleStrong survey is a perception-based one. What this means is that companies make their way into the survey simply because Indian workers want them to be there. Only employees - not students and those not working - were allowed to take part in the survey, which was conducted between August and October 2010, and was open for about 100 days. From 1,000 companies last year, the universe of this year's survey has expanded to 3,700 companies across 350 cities and towns. We reached out to a large employee base again this year (over 8,600 employees).

The Approach: An online survey allowed employees from different kinds of companies to participate and express their views. Online research is known to get more honest opinions. Mailers and other forms of communication were sent to randomly selected 1.5 million possible respondents, out of which about 70,000 (4.7 per cent) came to the survey page. Of these, 8,634 (12.3 per cent) respondents filled out the questionnaire. These respondents, 11 per cent of whom were women, were truly representative of the great Indian workplace (see graphics).



Data authenticity was ensured in two ways: a) the questionnaire design itself had built-in verifications that reject responses with contradictory/ incomplete information and; b) a verification backcheck of about 20 per cent of the accepted responses. Overall rejection was under 5 per cent.

No one company or a set of companies dominates the sample. No company had more than 30 respondents, and only eight companies had more than 20. The bulk of the companies had only one or two respondents.

The Ranking: Survey respondents were asked to select and rank five companies, which in their opinion were the best to work for across industries or sectors. The respondents were then asked to rank these five companies on five parameters - career growth prospects, financial compensation, work-life balance, performance evaluation and other hr practices. The rankings for each of these parameters were restricted to three companies. The ranking of companies within a sector was restricted to people working in that specific industry. Again, each respondent was asked to rank the top five in that industry on each of the above-mentioned parameters with the ranking then whittled to three companies. The final list of best companies to work for overall and within each sector was based on rank scores. Following what statisticians call the 90 per cent rule, Rank 1 got a rank score of 100, Rank 2 received 90, Rank 3: 81, Rank 4: 73 and Rank 5 translated into a

Statistics

Views

Total Views
2,668
Views on SlideShare
1,784
Embed Views
884

Actions

Likes
0
Downloads
44
Comments
0

11 Embeds 884

http://www.indicus.net 761
http://amitsinha64.blogspot.com 55
http://www.amitsinha64.blogspot.com 23
http://indicus.net 19
http://203.200.89.8 13
http://amitsinha64.blogspot.in 6
http://www.indicus.netwww.indicus.net 3
http://mal.indicus.net 1
http://webcache.googleusercontent.com 1
http://translate.googleusercontent.com 1
http://media.eyestate.in 1
More...

Accessibility

Categories

Upload Details

Uploaded via as Adobe PDF

Usage Rights

© All Rights Reserved

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Processing…
Post Comment
Edit your comment

Best companies to work for 2010 11 Best companies to work for 2010 11 Presentation Transcript

  • BestCompaniesto Work forIn India2010-11How We Did ItBusinessTodayIssue Dated January 18,2011
  • Ten is a significant age for asurvey. Business Todaysannual exercise of findingThe Best Companies toWork For turns 10 with thisedition. After completelyoverhauling themethodology in the summerof 2009 to make it "by theemployee and of theemployee", we have tried tofine-tune it further this year.So, along with our surveyand knowledge partners, wetried to capture not just theoverall ranking of 25companies and a sectorranking of 10 each for ninesectors but also the humanresource facets of the Indianworkplace.
  • Critical views from the employee universe, too, were captured in some detail. Forinstance: What factors do employees consider important in a workplace? Whatmakes a company attractive to its employees? What demoralises them? Whatupsets them enough to make them contemplate a job change? Are they satisfiedin their current role? If not, what can organisations do to address the factors theyare dissatisfied with? Do they believe the senior management of the companyadheres to ethical values? Read the answers elsewhere in this cover storypackage.We partnered with Indicus Analytics for designing and conducting the survey. Forhelping us interpret the results, we partnered with PeopleStrong, an HRconsultancy firm. First things first. The BT-Indicus Analytics-PeopleStrong surveyis a perception-based one. What this means is that companies make their wayinto the survey simply because Indian workers want them to be there. Onlyemployees - not students and those not working - were allowed to take part in thesurvey, which was conducted between August and October 2010, and was openfor about 100 days. From 1,000 companies last year, the universe of this yearssurvey has expanded to 3,700 companies across 350 cities and towns. Wereached out to a large employee base again this year (over 8,600 employees).
  • The Approach: An online survey allowed employees from different kinds ofcompanies to participate and express their views. Online research is known to getmore honest opinions. Mailers and other forms of communication were sent torandomly selected 1.5 million possible respondents, out of which about 70,000 (4.7per cent) came to the survey page. Of these, 8,634 (12.3 per cent) respondentsfilled out the questionnaire. These respondents, 11 per cent of whom were women,were truly representative of the great Indian workplace (see graphics).Data authenticity was ensured in two ways: a) the questionnaire design itself hadbuilt-in verifications that reject responses with contradictory/ incomplete informationand; b) a verification backcheck of about 20 per cent of the accepted responses.Overall rejection was under 5 per cent.No one company or a set of companies dominates the sample. No company hadmore than 30 respondents, and only eight companies had more than 20. The bulk ofthe companies had only one or two respondents.
  • The Ranking: Survey respondents were asked to select and rank five companies,which in their opinion were the best to work for across industries or sectors. Therespondents were then asked to rank these five companies on five parameters -career growth prospects, financial compensation, work-life balance, performanceevaluation and other hr practices. The rankings for each of these parameters wererestricted to three companies. The ranking of companies within a sector wasrestricted to people working in that specific industry. Again, each respondent wasasked to rank the top five in that industry on each of the above-mentionedparameters with the ranking then whittled to three companies. The final list of bestcompanies to work for overall and within each sector was based on rank scores.Following what statisticians call the 90 per cent rule, Rank 1 got a rank score of100, Rank 2 received 90, Rank 3: 81, Rank 4: 73 and Rank 5 translated into a rankscore of 66. The rank score for each company was aggregated across allrespondents and the highest scorer was assigned an index score of 100. Othercompanies were ranked relatively based on their aggregate scores.This method of scoring and indexing is considered robust in statistics. This is thesecond year of the survey in its new avatar. Our aim was to make the BT BestCompanies to Work For study bigger and comprehensive.
  • Converting ratings into importance weightsRespondents were asked to rate the various factors on a scale. These ratings were converted into importanceweights (percentage weights summing up to 100 per cent).A respondent assesses n(n-1)/ 2 importance ratios between attributes. This information is stored in the upper(or lower) triangle of a (n x n) matrix, whose typical element ajk represents the weight ratio of wi/wk. Theremaining elements of the matrix are filled by employing the reciprocal of the matrix: ajk = 1/akj and ajj = 1, forall j and k.Example: The following pair wise judgments were madeWe compute the geometric mean of each row of the matrix and then normalise the resulting numbers:The ratings of each respondent are converted into weights. For a given segment of the sample of respondents,the mean weights for every factor are then computed.