SMEAR LAYER   INDIAN DENTAL ACADEMYLeader in Continuing Dental Education   www.indiandentalacademy.com
Contents   Introduction   History   What is smear layer?   Morphology of the smear layer   Physiological consideratio...
Introduction   The term Smear layer is used most often to describe the    grinding debris left on dentin by cavity prepar...
History   Smear layer -17th century – Leeuwenhock.   Boyde,Switsur and Stewart,1963 - Grinding debris –    referred to a...
What is Smear layer ?   When tooth structure is cut ,instead of being uniformly    sheared, the mineralized matrix shatte...
Definition   Any debris ,calcific in nature,    produced by the reduction    or instrumentation of dentin,    enamel or c...
Morphology of the Smear LayerFormation   Exact mechanism- incompletely understood.   Boyde et al (1963)- Frictional heat...
   Gwinett A.J. (1984) –Dentin richer source of protein than    enamel, so the dentin matrix may contribute to the smear ...
Structure of smear layer   SEM - Amorphous, irregular and    granular appearance.   Eick et al (1970) - tooth particles ...
   Light microscope-Smear layer is absent.   SEM - undemineralized –low magnification-amorphous    apperance & dentinal ...
Composition   SEM : Organic and inorganic   Organic : heated coagulated proteins (gelatin formed by    the deterioration...
Layers of the smear layer   Cameron (1983) & Mader et al    (1984)- 2 parts    Superficial smear layer    Smear plugs   ...
Thickness –Smear layer   Goldman et al & Mader et al – 1-5µm   Thickness depends on    Type and sharpness of the cutting...
Attachment to the dentin   Gwinnet- smear layer is variable.   Pashley – smear layer lying over the dentin is analogous ...
Smear layer after use of steel and         tungsten burs   It produce an undulating pattern ,the troughs of which    run ...
Smear Layer– Carbide bur   www.indiandentalacademy.com
Diamond burs   Diamond points unlike carbide burs remove the dentinal    structure by abrading action.   Fine diamond bu...
   Absence of coolant- smeared debris can be found    commonly on the surface.   It does not form a continuous layer but...
Smear layer after the use of rotary           instrumentsHero 642-Snowy appearence                                    ProF...
PHYSIOLOGICAL CONSIDERATIONSINFLUENCE ON PERMEABILITY OF DENTINSubstances diffuse across dentin at a rate that is proporti...
Pashley distinguished between fluid movement inwardsfrom the dentin surface and outwards from the dentinal tubules.   ‘Dif...
(d4) (2π) (∆P)Fluid flow = ----------------- = 16 x                  (n) (L)    www.indiandentalacademy.com
The presence of smear layer - effect on the resistanceto movement of fluid across dentin by modifying tubuleradius.       ...
INFLUENCE ON SENSITIVITY OF DENTIN      Dentin sensitivity-open tubules in exposeddentin (Brannstrom 1982 ).       Pashl...
   If dentin is sensitive, then according to hydrodynamic    theory of dentin sensitivity, the dentinal tubules must be  ...
PATHOLOGICAL CONSIDERATIONS    a) Bacteria in the smear layer under restorations:     Brannstrom and Nyborg, 1971- growth...
    b)   Smear layer on dentin exposed to oral cavityWhen a smear layer is produced experimentally on human dentin,and lef...
c)The protective effect of smear plug in tubuleapertures and the consequences of removing theplugs   Vojinovic, Nyborg an...
   Pashley (1984) - smear plugs reduced the permeability    of dentin.    Etching and removal of smear plugs and peritub...
d) Pulpal irritation due to removal of smear layerCut dentin should not be treated with acid or EDTA -tubules becomeopen a...
Smear layer in restorative dentistry   Operative cutting process-smear layer.   Before restoration the layer       Left ...
Composite resin restorations   Early bonding agents utilizing the smear layer. Bond    strength-un satisfactory.   Newer...
Dahl (1978) - pumicing the dentin - three foldincrease in the tensile strength of the bond .         When cements are appl...
Tensile strength of a cement-dentin interface, Remove the smear layer by etching with acid. Use a resin that would infil...
     www.indiandentalacademy.com
Cast restorations While cementing cast restorations- pressure generated onand inside the casting .Since the cement is an ...
SMEAR LAYER IN ENDODONTICSIf a smear layer containing bacteria or bacterial products-allowed to remain within pulp chamber...
B.Sealers       Endodontic sealers acts as a glue to -good adaptation ofgutta percha to the canal walls. If the smear laye...
ROLE OF SMEAR LAYER IN           BONDING   Smear layer-removed or    altered-strong adhesive    bond.   Acid etching of ...
Adhesive Strategies-A ScientificClassification of Modern Adhesives.   3 Adhesion strategies-interact with the smear layer...
Smear layer –Modifying Adhesive   Smear layer –natural barrier to    the pulp.   Protecting it against bacterial    inva...
Smear layer –Removing Adhesives   Removal of smear layer-total-etch    concept.   Three-step smear layer –removing    ad...
Smear Layer-Dissolving Adhesives   Self-etching adhesives.   Self-etching primers partially      demineralize the smear ...
Smear Layer Treatment and Dentin        Bonding Agents   To chemically attach a restorative system to tooth    structure ...
   Dissolution : Dissolved smear layer plays a part in the                 chemical attachment of dentin bonding         ...
Modification    Eg: XR Bond, All bond   Treatment agent: XR Bond-ethyl alcohol,po4 ester.                        All bond...
AdvantagesSmear layer-Acts as a Biological Bandaid.It affords a drier surface for adhesion.Dentinal fluid flow rate –reduc...
   25-30 % porous –cant produce totally effective sealing.   Failure of retrograde filling following apical surgery.   ...
Methods of removal-smear layer             Smear layer removal is a controversy –fluctuateswith the various modalities of ...
The efficacy of the irrigating solution is dependent on :Chemical nature of solutionQuantity and temperatureContact timeDe...
  SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE NaOCl -organic tissue dissolving capacity.Use of NaOCl during or after instrumentation - superficial...
CHELATING AGENTSEthylene – Diamine tetra acetic acid(EDTA) which reacts with calcium ionsin dentin -soluble calcium chelat...
A quarternary ammonium bromide (Cetrimide) -added toEDTA (Fehr and Nygaard – Ostby 1983).   Mc Combe and Smith,1975 -when ...
ORGANIC ACIDS        Citric acid -effective root canalirrigant (coel 1975) and even moreeffective than Naocl alone inremov...
50% lactic acid ,      Canal walls -clean, but theopenings of dentinal tubules didnot appear to be completelypatent .     ...
SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE AND EDTA Smear layer - organic and inorganic components .   Combination - NaOCl and acids such as ci...
1% NaoCl & EDTA               5 minswww.indiandentalacademy.com
MTAD and NaOCl MTAD-mixture of tetracycline isomer       Acid (citric acid )       detergent (Tween -80)PH-2.15- removing...
SUGGESTED METHODS FOR REMOVING SMEAR LAYERAuthor             Amount          SolutionGoldman etal. (1981)      REDTA 17%  ...
Ultrasonic removal   A small file activated ultrasonically-fluid movement called    Acoustic streaming .   Cameron (1988...
           Acoustic streaming    www.indiandentalacademy.com
LASERS      Weichman & Johnson (1971) first                              applied a laser to the root canals -toseal the ap...
Nd:YAG laser- debris & smear layerbeing removed or melted,fused andrecrystallized .(Harashima et al1997).         Argon la...
Potassium Titanyl phosphate (KTP) laser -wavelength of 532µm - remove smear layer and debris from rootcanal. (Tenfik et. a...
xenon chlorine (xecl) laser - 308 µm can melt dentine andseal exposed dentinal tubules. (pini et. al. 1989, stabholz et.Al...
MICRO BRUSHES             Rotary and ultrasonic endobrushes - ISO lengthcontain 16mm. of bristles, - bristle diameters of ...
     www.indiandentalacademy.com
Conclusion   Smear layer is seen as a part of our daily clinical    practice. Though its dimensions are in micrometers, i...
Thank youwww.indiandentalacademy.com
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×

smear layer /certified fixed orthodontic courses by Indian dental academy

3,766

Published on

Welcome to Indian Dental Academy
The Indian Dental Academy is the Leader in continuing dental education , training dentists in all aspects of dentistry and offering a wide range of dental certified courses in different formats.


Indian dental academy has a unique training program & curriculum that provides students with exceptional clinical skills and enabling them to return to their office with high level confidence and start treating patients

State of the art comprehensive training-Faculty of world wide repute &Very affordable.

Published in: Education
2 Comments
14 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • very nice presentation , please doctor can i download it
    if you agree ,i will be thankful to you
    this is my email (azharali525@yahoo.com
       Reply 
    Are you sure you want to  Yes  No
    Your message goes here
  • Is there any way I can download this presentation ?
       Reply 
    Are you sure you want to  Yes  No
    Your message goes here
No Downloads
Views
Total Views
3,766
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
1
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
0
Comments
2
Likes
14
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

smear layer /certified fixed orthodontic courses by Indian dental academy

  1. 1. SMEAR LAYER INDIAN DENTAL ACADEMYLeader in Continuing Dental Education www.indiandentalacademy.com
  2. 2. Contents Introduction History What is smear layer? Morphology of the smear layer Physiological considerations Pathological considerations Smear layer in Restorative dentistry Smear layer in Endodontics Role of Bonding Methods of removal Advantages and Disadvantages conclusion www.indiandentalacademy.com
  3. 3. Introduction The term Smear layer is used most often to describe the grinding debris left on dentin by cavity preparation. Any debris produced iatrogenically by the cutting, not only of coronal dentin, but also of enamel, cementum and even the dentin of the root canal. www.indiandentalacademy.com
  4. 4. History Smear layer -17th century – Leeuwenhock. Boyde,Switsur and Stewart,1963 - Grinding debris – referred to as the smear layer. Eick and others,1970-Smeared layer. Mc Comb and Smith,1975 - Presence of smear layer- instrumented root canals. Goldman and others 1982 - Smear layer after the use of endodontic instruments. www.indiandentalacademy.com
  5. 5. What is Smear layer ? When tooth structure is cut ,instead of being uniformly sheared, the mineralized matrix shatters. Considerable quantities of cutting debris , made up of very small particles of mineralized collagen matrix, are produced. At the strategic interface of restorative materials and the dentin matrix, most of the debris is scattered –enamel and dentin www.indiandentalacademy.com surface.
  6. 6. Definition Any debris ,calcific in nature, produced by the reduction or instrumentation of dentin, enamel or cementum or as a contaminant which precludes interaction with the underlying pure tooth structure. - Eick www.indiandentalacademy.com
  7. 7. Morphology of the Smear LayerFormation Exact mechanism- incompletely understood. Boyde et al (1963)- Frictional heat during cavity preparation –important factor. Frictional heat may be 600ºC below the melting point of apatite -1800ºC to 2500ºC. Physiochemical phenomenon. www.indiandentalacademy.com
  8. 8.  Gwinett A.J. (1984) –Dentin richer source of protein than enamel, so the dentin matrix may contribute to the smear layer formed on enamel. Smear layer-by cutting when energy was expended. www.indiandentalacademy.com
  9. 9. Structure of smear layer SEM - Amorphous, irregular and granular appearance. Eick et al (1970) - tooth particles – less than 0.5µm to 15 µm. Pashley et al (1988) - Globular subunits ,0.05 -0.1 µm -originated from mineralized fibers. www.indiandentalacademy.com
  10. 10.  Light microscope-Smear layer is absent. SEM - undemineralized –low magnification-amorphous apperance & dentinal tubules are obscured. Higher magnification-granular substructure. www.indiandentalacademy.com
  11. 11. Composition SEM : Organic and inorganic Organic : heated coagulated proteins (gelatin formed by the deterioration of collagen heated by cutting temperatures ) Necrotic or viable pulp tissue Odontoblastic processes Saliva Blood cells and microorganisms. Inorganic Minerals from the dentinal structures Some non specific inorganic contaminants www.indiandentalacademy.com
  12. 12. Layers of the smear layer Cameron (1983) & Mader et al (1984)- 2 parts Superficial smear layer Smear plugs Extension of the packed material into dentinal tubules- 40µm Tubular packing phenomena- action of burs & endodontic instruments (Brannstrom and Johnson 1974) Penetration of smear material in to dentinal tubules-caused by capillary action – Cengiz et al (1990) www.indiandentalacademy.com
  13. 13. Thickness –Smear layer Goldman et al & Mader et al – 1-5µm Thickness depends on Type and sharpness of the cutting instruments Dry or wet cutting of the dentin Size and shape of the cavity or root canal Amount & chemical make up of irrigant used Thickest smear layer-10-15µm –coarse diamond blade (Pashley) www.indiandentalacademy.com
  14. 14. Attachment to the dentin Gwinnet- smear layer is variable. Pashley – smear layer lying over the dentin is analogous to wood being covered by wet saw dust. It is very tenacious but it is still permeable. www.indiandentalacademy.com
  15. 15. Smear layer after use of steel and tungsten burs It produce an undulating pattern ,the troughs of which run perpendicular with the direction of movement of the handpiece. Fine grooves can be seen running perpendicular to the undulations and parallel with the direction of rotation of the bur - “Galling” Frictional humps represent a “rebound effect” of the bur against the tooth surface. Galling phenomena - more marked with tungsten carbide burs. Fine grooves can be related to small facets found on cutting flutes of the bur. www.indiandentalacademy.com
  16. 16. Smear Layer– Carbide bur www.indiandentalacademy.com
  17. 17. Diamond burs Diamond points unlike carbide burs remove the dentinal structure by abrading action. Fine diamond burs- thin & dense smear layer Coarse diamond burs-thicker &looser smear layer www.indiandentalacademy.com
  18. 18.  Absence of coolant- smeared debris can be found commonly on the surface. It does not form a continuous layer but exists rather as localized islands with discontinuities exposing the underlying dentin. Coolant of water spray- reduce the amount and distribution of smeared debris. www.indiandentalacademy.com
  19. 19. Smear layer after the use of rotary instrumentsHero 642-Snowy appearence ProFile-Shiny & burnishedEngine Reamers –thinner & Profile -Muddy Appearance less compressed www.indiandentalacademy.com
  20. 20. PHYSIOLOGICAL CONSIDERATIONSINFLUENCE ON PERMEABILITY OF DENTINSubstances diffuse across dentin at a rate that is proportional Concentration gradient Surface area available for diffusion.The area available for diffusion in dentin is determined by Density of the tubules Diameter of the tubules.Theoretical area of diffusional surface varies from about 1% at DEJto 22% at the pulp. www.indiandentalacademy.com
  21. 21. Pashley distinguished between fluid movement inwardsfrom the dentin surface and outwards from the dentinal tubules. ‘Diffusion ’ as the movement of fluid from a high to lowconcentration. The rate of such movements varies with squareof radius (r 2 ). ‘ Convection’ as the pressure gradient in the tubules whichresults in a tendency for fluid outflow from the tubules ends.This varies with fourth power of radius (r 4 ). www.indiandentalacademy.com
  22. 22. (d4) (2π) (∆P)Fluid flow = ----------------- = 16 x (n) (L) www.indiandentalacademy.com
  23. 23. The presence of smear layer - effect on the resistanceto movement of fluid across dentin by modifying tubuleradius. Pashley & Others in 1978 - 86% of the totalresistance to flow of fluid. After etching with acid, the rate of flow of fluid increased-15 fold and (Reeder and Others 1978) 32 fold. Pashley - smear layer is removed Diffusion - ↑ 5 – 6 times. Convection - ↑ 25 – 26 times www.indiandentalacademy.com
  24. 24. INFLUENCE ON SENSITIVITY OF DENTIN Dentin sensitivity-open tubules in exposeddentin (Brannstrom 1982 ). Pashley et al- Movement of fluid in dentinal tubules –Dentin sensitivity. Etching dentin greatly increases the ease with which fluid can move across dentin. ↑ sensitivity of dentin to osmotic, thermal and tactile stimuli. www.indiandentalacademy.com
  25. 25.  If dentin is sensitive, then according to hydrodynamic theory of dentin sensitivity, the dentinal tubules must be patent and must allow movement of fluid across dentin. The presence of smear layer will prevent bacterial penetration of the tubules but will permit bacterial products to diffuse slowly into pulp. www.indiandentalacademy.com
  26. 26. PATHOLOGICAL CONSIDERATIONS a) Bacteria in the smear layer under restorations: Brannstrom and Nyborg, 1971- growth of bacteria undersilicate restorations.17 of the water cleaned cavities, withsmear layer remaining, numerous bacteria were present.Antiseptically cleaned & restored cavities-bacteria present. Bacteria may multiply on cavity walls even if there is noappreciable communication to the oral cavity seems to indicatethat certain microorganisms get sufficient nourishment fromthe smear layer and dentinal fluid. www.indiandentalacademy.com
  27. 27.     b) Smear layer on dentin exposed to oral cavityWhen a smear layer is produced experimentally on human dentin,and left exposed, it disappears after a couple of days and isreplaced by bacteria and after a week all most all tubules areopened and some even widened.The consequence is the invasion of bacteria. www.indiandentalacademy.com
  28. 28. c)The protective effect of smear plug in tubuleapertures and the consequences of removing theplugs Vojinovic, Nyborg and Brannstrom, 1973 - Etching thecavity prior to the placement of composite resin -massive invasion ofbacteria into dentinal tubules.The corresponding cavities cleaned by water and with the smear layerleft, had a bacterial layer on cavity walls but practically no invasioninto dentinal tubules.Smear plugs in the aperture of the tubules -prevented bacterialinvasion. www.indiandentalacademy.com
  29. 29.  Pashley (1984) - smear plugs reduced the permeability of dentin. Etching and removal of smear plugs and peritubular dentin - area of wet tubules may increase from about 10% to 25% - Garberoglio and Brannstrom, 1976 Difficult to dry the dentin. www.indiandentalacademy.com
  30. 30. d) Pulpal irritation due to removal of smear layerCut dentin should not be treated with acid or EDTA -tubules becomeopen and widened. e) Smear layer in root canals after reaming Carlson. L. Mader, J. Craig Baumgartner . Root canals- instrumented with k-type files and irrigated with 5.25% NaOClsolution. The smeared material -2 componentsSmeared layer on canal walls (1-2 µ m )Depth of tubule packing -few µ m to 40 µ m www.indiandentalacademy.com
  31. 31. Smear layer in restorative dentistry Operative cutting process-smear layer. Before restoration the layer Left in place Dissolved Can be replaced Modified or impregnated. Various studies-bacteria entrapped in the smear layer may survive and multiply under restorations. www.indiandentalacademy.com
  32. 32. Composite resin restorations Early bonding agents utilizing the smear layer. Bond strength-un satisfactory. Newer bonding system –partially or totally removed or impregnate the smear layer. Cements Glass ionomer and polycarboxylate-removal of smear layer. 10 % polyacrylic acid,30 %citric acid or hydrogen peroxide and distilled water. www.indiandentalacademy.com
  33. 33. Dahl (1978) - pumicing the dentin - three foldincrease in the tensile strength of the bond . When cements are applied to dentin covered with asmear layer and then tested for tensile strengthThe failure - either adhesive (between cement & smear layer)or cohesive (between constituents of smear layer) www.indiandentalacademy.com
  34. 34. Tensile strength of a cement-dentin interface, Remove the smear layer by etching with acid. Use a resin that would infiltrate through the entirethickness of the smear layer. To fix smear layer with glutaraldehyde (Hoppenbrouwers , Driessens & stadhouders, 1974) or tanning agents such astannic acid or Ferric chloride (Powis & other ,1982). To remove the smear layer by etching with acid and replaceit with an artificial smear layer composed of crystallineprecipitate(causton & Johnson,1982). Bowen used 5% ferric oxalate…. www.indiandentalacademy.com
  35. 35.   www.indiandentalacademy.com
  36. 36. Cast restorations While cementing cast restorations- pressure generated onand inside the casting .Since the cement is an incompressible liquid, it will transfer thispressure of fluid on and in dentin.Displacement of fluid in dentinal tubules.Thus it may be movements of fluid rather than the acidity of thecement, produces pain and pulpal irritation. The ease with which fluid can be forced across dentin isformalized by a term called “Hydraulic conductance ”. Volume of fluid transported across a known area of surfaceper unit time under a gradient of unit pressure (Reeder &Others, 1978). www.indiandentalacademy.com
  37. 37. SMEAR LAYER IN ENDODONTICSIf a smear layer containing bacteria or bacterial products-allowed to remain within pulp chamber or root canals,it mightprovide a reservoir of potential irritants.Apical Leakage Kennedy-absence of smear layer-less apical leakage. Removal of smear layer would improve gutta percha seals ifmaster cones are softened with chloroform and used withsealer and lateral condensation. Plasticized gutta percha –dentinal tubules-smear layer isabsent –mechanical lock between the guttapercha and thecanal wall. www.indiandentalacademy.com
  38. 38. B.Sealers Endodontic sealers acts as a glue to -good adaptation ofgutta percha to the canal walls. If the smear layer is not removed, the gutta percha may partlybe glued to dentin in the smear layer as well as to the exposedparts of the canal wall. Removing the smear layer from the root canals permitsincreased tensile strength of plastic posts(Goldman &others,1984). www.indiandentalacademy.com
  39. 39. ROLE OF SMEAR LAYER IN BONDING Smear layer-removed or altered-strong adhesive bond. Acid etching of the dentin Pka of the acid PH Chemical concentration& Viscosity. www.indiandentalacademy.com
  40. 40. Adhesive Strategies-A ScientificClassification of Modern Adhesives. 3 Adhesion strategies-interact with the smear layer.1.modify the smear layer &incorporate it in the bonding processes.One and two step2. removes the smear layer .Two-step and three-step3. Dissolves the smear layer. One and two step www.indiandentalacademy.com
  41. 41. Smear layer –Modifying Adhesive Smear layer –natural barrier to the pulp. Protecting it against bacterial invasion. Limiting the outflow of pulpal fluid. Effective wetting and in situ polymerization of monomers- micromechanical +chemical bond. www.indiandentalacademy.com
  42. 42. Smear layer –Removing Adhesives Removal of smear layer-total-etch concept. Three-step smear layer –removing adhesives. With the newest generationof one- bottle or single-bottle adhesives -3 step smear layer removing systems-reduced to two steps. www.indiandentalacademy.com
  43. 43. Smear Layer-Dissolving Adhesives Self-etching adhesives. Self-etching primers partially demineralize the smear layer & the underlying dentin –with out removing dissolved smear layer remnants or unplugging the tubule orifices. www.indiandentalacademy.com
  44. 44. Smear Layer Treatment and Dentin Bonding Agents To chemically attach a restorative system to tooth structure one of several options must be considered for the smear layer. Smear layer is managed- 5 ways (John et al). 1. No treatment at all. Smear layer is left intact. Eg. Scotch Bond 2 and prisma. www.indiandentalacademy.com
  45. 45.  Dissolution : Dissolved smear layer plays a part in the chemical attachment of dentin bonding agent. Eg: Scotch bond 2 and Mirage bond.Treatment agent :SB-2 -Maleic acid. Mirage Bond-HEMA Removal: Gluma Treatment agent-EDTA. www.indiandentalacademy.com
  46. 46. Modification Eg: XR Bond, All bond Treatment agent: XR Bond-ethyl alcohol,po4 ester. All bond- Succinic acid &HEMARemoval & Replacement Eg-Tenure –replaces the smear Layer with oxalate crystals which are deposited in the dentinal tubules. Treatment agent –Nitric acid, Aluminium oxalate. www.indiandentalacademy.com
  47. 47. AdvantagesSmear layer-Acts as a Biological Bandaid.It affords a drier surface for adhesion.Dentinal fluid flow rate –reduced in the presence of smearlayer.Bacterial penetration –dentinal tubules is prevented.DisadvantagesIt do not afford adequate bonding of material to dentin throughthem.It affect the physiologic status of the odontoblastic process inthe underlying dentin. www.indiandentalacademy.com
  48. 48.  25-30 % porous –cant produce totally effective sealing. Failure of retrograde filling following apical surgery. Avenue for leakage of microorganisms & a source of substrate for bacterial growth. Viable bacteria-remain in dentinal tubules use the smear layer –sustained growth &activity. www.indiandentalacademy.com
  49. 49. Methods of removal-smear layer Smear layer removal is a controversy –fluctuateswith the various modalities of restorative dentistry. Pashley-removing most of the smear layer over thetubules is difficult to achieve clinically - complex geometry ofmany cavities .Irrigating solutions - used during and after instrumentation toincrease cutting efficacy of root canal instruments and toflush away debris. www.indiandentalacademy.com
  50. 50. The efficacy of the irrigating solution is dependent on :Chemical nature of solutionQuantity and temperatureContact timeDepth of penetration of irrigation needleType and gauge of needleSurface tension of irrigating solutionAge of solution (Ingle 1985). www.indiandentalacademy.com
  51. 51.   SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE NaOCl -organic tissue dissolving capacity.Use of NaOCl during or after instrumentation - superficiallyclean canal walls with smear layer present (Baken et al1975, Goldman et al 1981). Alternating use of hydrogen peroxide and NaOClMc Combe and Smith (1975) - combination was not moreeffective in removing smear layer than NaOCl aloneproduced. www.indiandentalacademy.com
  52. 52. CHELATING AGENTSEthylene – Diamine tetra acetic acid(EDTA) which reacts with calcium ionsin dentin -soluble calcium chelates(Grossman et al 1988). Fehr and Nygaard-Ostby (1963) -Decalcified dentin to a depth of 20 – 30µm in 5 mins. Fraser (1974) - chelating effect-negligible in apical third of root canals. EDTA for 5 mins In a combination, urea peroxide wasadded (Rc-Prep) to float the dentinaldebris -root canal (Stevard et al 1969). www.indiandentalacademy.com
  53. 53. A quarternary ammonium bromide (Cetrimide) -added toEDTA (Fehr and Nygaard – Ostby 1983). Mc Combe and Smith,1975 -when this combination (REDTA)was used -no smear layer except in apical part of canal.EDTAC – Circumpulpal surface had a smooth structure;Dentinaltubules-regular circular appearence. 15 mins-working time(Goldberg and Spielbers, 1982).-Salvisol - based on Aminoquinaldinum diacetate .combined action of chelation and organic debridement .Better cleansing properties than EDTA-C (Frenstiller et al 1988). www.indiandentalacademy.com
  54. 54. ORGANIC ACIDS Citric acid -effective root canalirrigant (coel 1975) and even moreeffective than Naocl alone inremoving the smear layers(Baumgartner et al 1984). 50% Citric acid Citric acid removed smearlayer better -polyacrylic acid , lacticacid and phosphoric acid exceptEDTA .Disadvantage -leaves precipitatedcrystals. www.indiandentalacademy.com Crystals of Ca & P
  55. 55. 50% lactic acid , Canal walls -clean, but theopenings of dentinal tubules didnot appear to be completelypatent . Bitter (1989)- 25 % tannicacid-canals were cleaner & lactic acidsmoother than the walls treated –H2O2 and NaOCl. McComb et al (1976) - 5% and 10 % polyacrylic acid-remove the smear layer –accessible regions. polyacrylic acid www.indiandentalacademy.com
  56. 56. SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE AND EDTA Smear layer - organic and inorganic components . Combination - NaOCl and acids such as citric ,tannic,polyacrylic or chelating agents such as EDTA. Most effective working solution -5.25% NaOCl and themost effective final flush was 10ml. of 17% EDTA followed by10ml. of 5.25% NaOCl (Goldman et al.1982). www.indiandentalacademy.com
  57. 57. 1% NaoCl & EDTA 5 minswww.indiandentalacademy.com
  58. 58. MTAD and NaOCl MTAD-mixture of tetracycline isomer Acid (citric acid ) detergent (Tween -80)PH-2.15- removing inorganic substances.NaOCl- removes organic portion.EGTA and NaOClEthylene glycol-bis (B-amino-ethyl ether)-N,N,N,N-Tetra acetic acid.No erosion –intertubular and peritubular dentin. www.indiandentalacademy.com
  59. 59. SUGGESTED METHODS FOR REMOVING SMEAR LAYERAuthor Amount SolutionGoldman etal. (1981) REDTA 17% 20mlGoldman etal. (1982) REDTA 17% 10ml Naocl 5.25% 10mlYamada etal (1983) REDTA 17% 10ml Naocl 5.25% 10mlWhite etal (1984) REDTA 17% 10ml Naocl 5.25 10mlCiucchi etal (1989) Naocl 3% 1ml EDTA 15% 2mlGettleman etal (1991) EDTA 17% - www.indiandentalacademy.com
  60. 60. Ultrasonic removal A small file activated ultrasonically-fluid movement called Acoustic streaming . Cameron (1988) - 2 % to 4 % NaOCl +ultrasonic energy- removal of smear layer. Cameron (1983) -3-5 min irrigation-effective. Guerisoli et al- 15 % EDTAC +Distilled water or 1 % Naocl. www.indiandentalacademy.com
  61. 61.   Acoustic streaming www.indiandentalacademy.com
  62. 62. LASERS Weichman & Johnson (1971) first  applied a laser to the root canals -toseal the apical foramen in vitro -highpower CO2 laser. Middle thirdpashley et al (1992)- Co2 laser- dentinpermeability; melting smear layer. Apical third www.indiandentalacademy.com
  63. 63. Nd:YAG laser- debris & smear layerbeing removed or melted,fused andrecrystallized .(Harashima et al1997). Argon laser - efficient cleaningactivity on instrumented root canals Middle third(Harashima et al 1997)Er : YAG laser -more effective - Aror Nd:YAG laser (Takalashi et. al.1996) Apical third www.indiandentalacademy.com
  64. 64. Potassium Titanyl phosphate (KTP) laser -wavelength of 532µm - remove smear layer and debris from rootcanal. (Tenfik et. al 1998 ) Nano second-pulsed, frequency-doubled Nd:YAGlaser - smear layer removal (Arrastia-Jitosho et. al. 1998) www.indiandentalacademy.com
  65. 65. xenon chlorine (xecl) laser - 308 µm can melt dentine andseal exposed dentinal tubules. (pini et. al. 1989, stabholz et.Al)Ar-fluoride (F) excimer laser–removal of peritubular dentineat relatively high fluency (10 ~13 J/cm2) with melting andresolidification of the dentinal smear layer (stabholz et. Al). www.indiandentalacademy.com
  66. 66. MICRO BRUSHES Rotary and ultrasonic endobrushes - ISO lengthcontain 16mm. of bristles, - bristle diameters of 0.40, 0.50 ,0.60 and 0.80mm. Rotary activated micro brushes -300 RPM, helicalbristle pattern effectively -residual debris out of the canal in acoronal direction. Micro brushes designed for ultrasonic use- activateNaOCl and 17% EDTA -produced cleaned canals. Regardless of rotary versus ultrasonic activation,microbrush can finish the preparation -17% EDTA for 1 min. toclean the root canal system. www.indiandentalacademy.com
  67. 67.   www.indiandentalacademy.com
  68. 68. Conclusion Smear layer is seen as a part of our daily clinical practice. Though its dimensions are in micrometers, it is of strategic importance in restorative dentistry and endodontics. To prevent the infection into the dentinal tubules, microleakage, and for proper adhesion , it is advised to remove the smear layer and smear plugs. www.indiandentalacademy.com
  69. 69. Thank youwww.indiandentalacademy.com

×