Roth philosophy /certified fixed orthodontic courses by Indian dental academy


Published on

The Indian Dental Academy is the Leader in continuing dental education , training dentists in all aspects of dentistry and offering a wide range of dental certified courses in different formats.

Indian dental academy provides dental crown & Bridge,rotary endodontics,fixed orthodontics,
Dental implants courses.for details pls visit ,or call

  • Be the first to comment

No Downloads
Total views
On SlideShare
From Embeds
Number of Embeds
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

Roth philosophy /certified fixed orthodontic courses by Indian dental academy

  1. 1. THE ROTH PHILOSOPHY INDIAN DENTAL ACADEMY Leader in continuing dental education
  2. 2. In 1968, R . H ROTH was introduced to Dr. L.F. ANDREWS of San Diego Roth started using straight wire appliance in his practice in 1970 when Andrews gave him the first set of prototype brackets that were welded into pinched band material and had been machined at great expense. After seeing the treatment progress of the first patient, he purchased the first commercially available Andrews brackets and started all his new cases with SWA. By the mid 1973,he switched his entire practice over to the SWA and rebonded all the patients who still had edgewise brackets.
  3. 3. He did extensive work in Andrews SWA and published two articles namely 1.Five year clinical evaluation of Andrews SW appliance.(1976 jco) 2.The SW appliance 17 years later (1987 jco). He started designing his own prescription as a clinical trial and error evaluation that lasted severed years. Cases were evaluated by the use of •Intra oral photograph and •Mounted models for tooth positions During treatment and At the end of appliance therapy
  4. 4. According to him teeth tend to relapse back from which they started, and if counter-tip, counter-rotation, counter-torque, and leveling of the curve of Spee were applied to the SWA in every possible direction, then it should be possible to use primarily one prescription for most cases, and to finish to an "END OF APPLIANCE THERAPY" goal in which all tooth positions are slightly overcorrected and from which the teeth will most likely settle into non-orthodontic normal positions So with the concept of overcorrection he designed his comprehensive prescription using the available Andrews extraction brackets.
  5. 5. THE ROTH Rx In 1979, Roth introduced a bracket setup containing modifications of the tip, torque, rotations and in out movement of the Andrews standard setup brackets. Ronald H. Roth
  6. 6. The major difference between the Andrews philosophy and the Roth approach to the use of the straight wire appliance has to do with the manner in which the teeth are moved and not necessarily the desired end result or the result attained. ANDREWS attempts to translate teeth throughout treatment without ever tipping teeth. This leads to the necessity of utilizing sliding mechanics and number of different series of brackets to solve the problem of translating teeth depending on how far the teeth must be moved. In the ROTH approach, tipping of teeth is allowed, by using round wires in the initial phase of the treatment, but the attempt is to keep the tipping to a minimum wherein it is not necessary to resort to complex mechanics to do the uprighting
  7. 7. Andrews' occlusion study was based purely upon anatomical measurements of tooth positions on untreated normals. According to him teeth should be positioned from an “ANATOMICAL STANDPOINT’” Roth’s occlusion study was based purely upon pantographically recorded and mounted a large number of post-treatment orthodontic cases on the Stuart articulator According to him natural teeth should be positioned from a “GNATHOLOGICAL STANDPOINT”
  8. 8. Andrews SW appliance….. Andrews collected 120 Non orthodontic models. He studied these models anatomically and laid down his “six keys to normal occlusion” I MOLAR RELATION IV ROTATIONS II CROWN ANGULATION V TIGHT CONTACTS III CROWN INCLINATION VI CURVE OF SPEE •After determining the “six keys to normal occlusion” he made certain measurements in the non orthodontic models which helped him in the development of SWA Andrews original standard straight wire brackets were designed to treat only non extraction cases with an ANB differential of less than 5º without the necessity of putting offset bends into the wire.
  9. 9. Then he introduced the extraction brackets which had counter tip and counter rotations built in, to allow translation of teeth as much as possible and to offset any relapse tendency. Later he introduced different series and sets of brackets for different combinations of extractions, and differentials, and anchorage requirement He developed a special classification of malocclusion and prescribed various bracket series for treatment of each, to allow translation of teeth without the need for bending offsets and also to allow for over correction in view of relapse tendencies.
  10. 10. - what made roth to modify Andrews SW appliance Inventory problem-To treat different cases clinicians were to buy band kits for all Andrews sets and series. They are very extensive inventory on the self. Also, changing anything about the appliances would be prohibitively expensive. Anchorage loss -When mesially angulated brackets are placed on the posterior teeth, the teeth tend to tip mesially and migrate forward that resulted is anchorage loss. Problem in finishing - To achieve desired tooth positions with the standard SWA, it was necessary to finish the mechanotherapy phase of treatment by placing compensating and reverse curve in the upper and lower archwire.
  11. 11. Roth's rationale for his bracket set up. The purpose of the Roth setup was to provide over corrected tooth positions prior to appliance removal that would allow the teeth in most instances to settle to what was found is non orthodontic normals studied by Andrews. •With the appliance in place, it is virtually impossible, because of bracket interference, to position the teeth precisely into the occlusion shown by the non orthodontic normal sample. •After appliance removal no matter how well treated the patient may be, the teeth will shift slightly from the positions they occupied at the time the appliance were removed
  12. 12. •Play or tipping freedom - Due to the play between the archwire and bracket, the delivered tip, torque and rotations forces are less than the designated amount “built in” the slot which need over correction to compensates for play. •The curve of Spee will return or deepen after appliance removal. •Teeth adjacent to an extraction site will tend to rotate and tip towards the extraction site. •As teeth in the buccal segments settle they will rotate and tip mesially, so if they are overcorrected and slightly tipped distally, they will tend to settle better than teeth that are already mesially inclined. •As band spaces close, there is a corresponding loss of torque of the anterior teeth.
  13. 13. OVERCORRECTION Extracted teeth with Roth Rx SWA brackets, showing over correction built in to the brackets Extracted teeth with Andrews SWA brackets showing non – orthodontic normal tooth position.
  14. 14. ROTH CONCEPT OF SELECTION OF TREATMENT MECHANICS Thorough diagnosis Establishing treatment goals Dynamic treatment planning
  15. 15. The traditional method of selecting treatment mechanics, based on the Angle's classification of malocclusion, is inadequate. Treatment mechanics should be selected by the set of conditions that exist along with the parameters that are placed on the situation. (The treatment mechanics must be tailored to the individual situation and the individual facial type).
  16. 16. •In diagnosis and treatment planning, it is necessary to diagnose the case from a mandibular position of centric relation, if one wish to treat centric relation occlusion. •One must utilize a specific set of criteria for a functional occlusion goal throughout diagnosis, treatment planning, and retention •One must have records. (Standard orthodontic models and cephalometric centric relation head films) taken in centric relation as well, if any significant centric discrepancy exists in a particular case
  17. 17. CO - CR discrepancy The neuromuscular positioning of the mandible will accommodate to existing occlusal discrepancies and hide the true nature of malocclusion So a REPOSITIONING SPLINT should be fabricated •To get the patient's mandible into centric and •To make the true discrepancy apparent. Once the discrepancies are apparent, one should make a treatment plan to deal with all of the discrepancies present in the case and not just one to cover only those discrepancies he can see intraorally.
  18. 18. TREATMENT MECHANIC •Those that are used on normal to brachyfacial types. Those that are used for the more dolichofacial types
  19. 19. TREATMENT MECHANIC SELECTIONS - FACTORS TO BE CONSIDERED. •The facial type of an individuals. •Reactions of various facial types to the proposed treatment. •How much growth remains and in which direction the mandible can be expected to grow and what means must be taken to alter the direction of this growth - favourably with treatment mechanics. •Effect of treatment mechanics on the patient's soft tissue profile.
  20. 20. TO PLAN AND TO SELECT APPROPRIATE TREATMENT MECHANICS, ROTH UTILIZED. •An adjusted head film tracing from centric (habitual) occlusion to centric relation. •Ricketts VTO and •The five position superimposition •Jarabak analysis .
  21. 21. The five position superimposition is utilised to quantify •The amount of growth needed to correct the jaw relationship. •The amount of orthopedic changes or jaw relationship changes necessary to correct the dental arch relationship and •The extent of tooth movement allowable or desirable both anteroposteriorly and vertically of the anterior and posterior teeth in each arch.
  22. 22. Jarabak analysis For qualitative assessment of the facial type and its probable response to the various kinds of treatment mechanics and growth. The most important measurementsare •The anterior to posterior face height ratio, •The tendency of the individual facial type to rotate clockwise or counter clockwise during growth, and •a response to certain treatment mechanics
  23. 23. Treatment goals 1. Pleasing facial esthetics, evaluated by soft tissue and skeletal measurements cephalometrically. 2. Molar relation and tooth alignment, evaluated by Angle's description of anatomical occlusion. 3. Functional occlusion, evaluated gnathologically on an articulator. 4. Stability of postreatment tooth positions and alignment. 5. Comfort, efficiency, and longevity of the dentition, supporting structures, and the temporomandibular joints.
  24. 24. ROTH'S ORTHODONTIC TREATMENT GOALS FOR AN IDEAL FUNCTIONAL OCCIUSION . I- Centric maximum occlusion or interuspation of the teeth should occur with the mandible relation, in condyles transversersy in centric which are and they centered seated against the articulator disks at the posterosuperior slopes of the eminence
  25. 25. This centric relation occlusion should have three point contact of the opposing centric cusps in their respective fossae. II- Mutually protective occlusion Occlusal force during closure should be of equal magnitude for all posterior teeth and the stress should be directed along the long axes of the teeth and the lower incisors should not be in contact with the lingual surface of upper incisors and should have a clearance of 0.005 inch (by transmitting all the occlusal forces, the centric stops of the posterior teeth will protect the anterior teeth from lateral stress).
  26. 26. Anterior guidance / incisal guidance In straight protrusion the anterior teeth should serve as a gentle glide path to disclude the posterior teeth very gently. To have such anterior guidance, there should be minimal but sufficient anterior overbite. In the absence of anterior guidance, excessive lateral stress on the cuspids may cause lingual movement of the lower cuspids and resultant lower anterior crowding, and/or labial movement of the maxillary cuspids and affects post treatment stability. No stress
  27. 27. Canine guidance / canine rise In lateral excursions the maxillary cuspids should act as guiding inclines to disclude the teeth on the balancing or non-functioning side and to disclude the teeth on the working or functioning side after approximately .5mm of group contact. balancing working R L
  28. 28. In a "mutually protective" occlusion •The anterior teeth protect the posterior teeth from lateral stress during protrusive movement and The posterior teeth protect the anterior teeth from lateral stress during closure into centric relation occlusion •So in a mutually protective occlusion, the mandible can execute its total range or envelope of motion without interference from the teeth and During closure the teeth will direct and maintain centricity of the condyles in the fossae
  29. 29. III -Tooth-to-two-teeth or cusp-embrasure occlusion During maximum intercuspation, there should should be Toothto-two-teeth or cusp-embrasure occlusion between the upper and lower teeth, because this make the lateral and protrusive movements with proper cuspid and incisor contact. IV- Tooth structure, tooth position and occlusal form should correlate perfectly with mandibular border movements, including the Bennett movement and immediate side shift.
  30. 30. ROTH'S ORTHODONTIC TREATMENT GOAL FOR AN IDEAL STATIC OCCLUSION. In terms of tooth alignment, the goal primarily is one is in very close harmony to that described by Andrews in his "six keys to normal occlusion".
  31. 31. ROTH SETUP Roth setup is available in both 0.018 and 0.022 slot Roth preferred 0.022 slot brackets because it offered more advantages •In terms of wire size selection, •In terms of stabilizing arches as anchor units and for orthognathic surgery and •For control of torque in the buccal segments, which is very important from the standpoint of functional occlusion.
  32. 32. The Roth setup incorporated into it a member of hooks for various types of elastic configuration and also double triple and lip bumper tube for the use of auxillary wires and attachments.
  33. 33. Bracket positioning with Roth set up The bracket placement vary slightly from the position advocated by Andrews, thus a flat, unbent, rectangular, full sized wire can be used as the finishing wire rather than one with reverse and compensating curve. Reference point – Andrews FA point The point on the facial axis that separates the gingival half of the clinical crown from the occlusal half. The key in determining the bracket height is the canine and premolars (second premolars is an extraction case). Ideally the center of the bracket should be placed at the maximum convexity of the crowns of the posterior teeth. In a teeth with average height of gingival attachment, the maximum convexity of the teeth will be at the center of the clinical crown.
  34. 34. Molars(upper/lower) From the buccal From the occlusal MB Both the right and left bands should be checked to ensure that they are in the same relative position on the crowns
  35. 35. Premolars(upper/lower) From the buccal From the occlusal Upper premolar bracket placement is the most variable because of tooth size. The most common error is not placing the bracket gingival enough, especially on smaller sized teeth.
  36. 36. Upper and lower Canine From the buccal From the occlusal
  37. 37. Upper and lower incisors
  38. 38. Upper arch Central tip torque rotation Andrews 5 7 0 Roth 5 12 0 9 3 0 9 8 0 Lateral If it is increased the resultant axial is esthetically and functionally undesirable The 5 torque increase in torque improves •Ethetics by preventing flattened profile, straight upper lip and obtuse nasolabial angle. •Provide more space for lower anterior teeth, thereby aiding classI intercuspation and •Establish proper anterior guidance & prevent lateral stress in posterior segments
  39. 39. Upper canine tip torque rotation Andrews 11 -7 0 Roth 13 -2 4M(mesial) •Increased because they are being retracted in most treatment. •Less negative torque to offset the reciprocal effect of building more positive torque into the incisors.
  40. 40. I&II PM tip torque rotation (A) 2 -7 0 (R) 0 -7 2D IM &IIM (A) 5 -9 10 (R) 0 -14 14D • Elimination of the mesial tip on all buccal segment teeth strengthened anchorage control significantly (but burning anchorage can be difficult). •To offset mesial the rotation that accompanies distal traction •The distal rotation of mesiobuccal cusp with reciprocal mesial rotation MB of mesiolingual cusp due to which cusp the cusp to cusp relation is changed to class I molar relation.
  41. 41. LOWER ARCH CENTRAL &LATERAL tip torque rotation (A) 2 -1 0 (R) 2 -1 0 (A) 5 -11 0 (R) 7 -11 2M CANINE
  42. 42. I PM tip (A) 2 -17 0 (R) -1 -17 4D 2 -22 0 -1 -22 4D 2 -30 0 -1 -30 4D 2 -35 0 -1 -30 4D II PM IM II M torque rotation • Because these teeth settle more mesially than the upper and simultaneously rotate mesially thus necessiating extra distal roration • No change in the torque-To establish proper functional occlusion
  43. 43. ROTH TRU-ARCH FORM Roth Tru-Arch form was derived from his extensive clinical testing and recording of jaw-movement patterns in treated patients who were out of retention and had remained stable.
  44. 44. . The Roth Tru-Arch form actually overcorrects the arch width slightly. In the front part of the arch, the widest part is at the bicuspids, not at the cuspids. The widest point in the entire arch is at the first molars region,(mesiobuccal cusp of I molar) There are actually five arcs in the Arch •A curve across the front •A Curve in cuspid-bicuspid area •A uniform curve in the buccal segment to allow for proper rotational position of the buccal segment teeth.
  45. 45. SEQUENCING OF TREATMENT OBJECTIVES The sequence of the treatment should be based on the dictates of the individual case. The sequence of treatment objectives are generally. 1. Eliminating cross bite 2. Correcting jaw relationship 3. Eliminating severe crowding creating space in the dental arches for severely malposed, impacted or blocked teeth, 4. Aligning the teeth in the individual arches, 5. Beginning space consolidation
  46. 46. 6. Finishing the lower arch It is of utmost importance that the lower arch must be finished in the correct position to act as a template to receive the upper teeth, so that the upper teeth can be set to the lowers 7. Achieving class I relationship of buccal segment, 8. Retracting and as if necessary intruding maxillary arterior teeth. 9. Detailing and finalizing the tooth position and the occlusion. In many instances a number of these steps will be combined and will be occurring simultaneously.
  47. 47. THE THREE PHASES OF TREATING MALOCCLUSION INCLUDES Phase I unlocking the malocclusion Phase II Working phase. Phase III Finalization or detailing of occlusion •To initial phase of treatment usually entails the use of some of the following appliances •Split palate Hass - type appliance •Quard helix •Transpalatal bar and / or a lingual arch •An occipital pull headgear or facebow to the 6 years molar •Utility arch.
  48. 48. Anchorage consideration Factors responsible for anchorage loss 1. Attempting to upright extremely distally tipped canines. 2. Pulling distally with posterior teeth against extremely procumbent or labially inclined incisors. 3. Attempting to level the curve of Spee with a continuous wire without the use of distal traction. 4. Attempting to do any of the first three tooth movements utilizing either a stiff or a resilient wire. 5. Attempting to move lingually or torque the maxillary incisor roots. 6. Attempting to expand the mandibular arch with a labial archwire.
  49. 49. some of the ways in which one can avoid using extra oral traction or losing anchorage are •The leveling process should be started with a small flexible wire. The best for this purpose is the braided arch wire. •When it is time to retract and upright lower anteriors that have been in labial or procumbent position, they should be retracted initially with an anterior facebow. In most instances 6 to 8 weeks of headgear to the lower anterior segment is all that is needed to upright the lower anterior teeth sufficiently that the remainder of the space can be closed with reciprocal mechanics.
  50. 50. •Band the second molars at the outset of full dentition treatment and use them for anchorage. It is much more difficult to displace the buccal segments in the mandibular dental arch forward if the second molars have been included as part of the anchorage unit. •When leveling the curve of Spee, wherever possible a utility arch should be used to intrude the incisors followed by canine by Bioprogressive technique and then going to the flexible small wires to gain bracket engagement and alignment of the entire arch and gradually level the remainder of the curve of Spee.
  51. 51. Phase I treatment •Helical loop archwires, Jarabak fashion made from 0.016” Elgiloy green wire(crowing) or 0.015” braided archwire(routinely) or Nitinol(severe rotation) • 0.019” braided wire • 0.018”Australian special plus.(finalisation of any stuborn rotation) •0.019” square blue Elgiloy utility arches are used in case of intrusion of incisor
  52. 52. Second phase of treatment. Anterior teeth are generally retracted en masse as a group of 6 second molars are routinely banded at the outset of treatment in the permanent dentition. Double keyhole loop wire mechanics (0.019 x 0.026” round edge rectangular)- In case of minimum and moderate anchorage casesModified Asher facebow- used in cases that need maximum anchorage and retraction.
  53. 53. At the end of space closure Double keyhole loop wire mechanics Replaced by 0.018x0.025” blue elgiloy incorporating exaggerated R & C curve with special torque adjustments(to offset the the undesirable effect produced by R & C curves) to provide •Rapid root paralleling •Leveling of Curve of spee & •Maxillary incisors lingual root torque
  54. 54. During extraction space closure, faster the space is closed, regardless of wire size, the more tipping there will be into the extraction space. So it is the force & rate at which the extraction space is closed determines the type of tooth movement(tipping or bodily) and not the dimension of the wire used.
  55. 55. FINISHING PHASE . The final finishing phase of treatment require filling of the bracket slot (0.022 x 0.025) to get full bracket expression. Short class II or III elastics are used to create anteroposterior denture adjustments. DETAILING OF TOOTH POSITION THE MANDIBULAR ARCH Lower incisors •The sequence of tooth positioning begins with placing the lower incisors teeth at or slightly lingual to the cephalometric goal. (-1 to A-Pog)
  56. 56. Over bite 0.005” over jet 2.5 mm 2.5 mm
  57. 57. •The four incisors teeth should have the roots divergent and roots appears to be in the same plane of space when viewed from the superior aspect. •Lower cuspid crowns should have 5 degrees angulation with the incisal tip 1mm higher than the incisal edge of, the lateral incisors And it should have should have a slightly exaggerated mesial rotation on extraction cases. •There should be overcorrection of root parallelism in the extraction site, if extractions were done.
  58. 58. •Bicuspids and molars should be upright and should have slight distal rotation. •There should be no spaces, and the arch form should be symmetrical. •The widest point of the mandibular arch should be the mesiobuccal cusps of the maxillary Imolars and the I bicuspid. •The curve of Spee should be leveled.(because it return to a 11.5mm curve, at its deepest point, after appliance removal and settling of the occlusion
  59. 59. MAXILLARY ARCH In the upper arch, the first tooth to be placed properly in relation to the lower arch should be the maxillary six-year molar. The upper six-year molars should have sufficient distal rotation, mesioaxial inclination, and buccal root torque, so as to fit with the lower six-year molars, as described by Andrews The maxillary twelve-year molar The upper bicuspids The upper anteriors
  60. 60. •The incisal edges of upper centrals and laterals should be almost at the same level with no more than 0.5mm height differential approximately •The widest point of the maxillary arch should be the mesiobuccal cusps of the maxillary six-year molars. •Cusp tip of the canine should be app 1-1.5mm incisally than the of the occlusal plane.
  61. 61. ROTH’S CONCLUDING STATEMENT “I have tried to present a philosophy of treatment with the concept of overcorrection, based on the specific set of goals stated at the outset, taking in to account existing conditions, facial types, and reaction to treatment mechanics. Naturally there are always exceptions to the way one approaches treatment”
  62. 62. REFERENCES •Treatment mechanics for the straight wire appliance- RONALD H. ROTH •orthodontics - current principles and techniques- Thomas M. Graber, Brainerd F. Swain •Treatment concepts using the fully dimensional appliance- RONALD H. ROTH preadjusted three- •Orthodontics- current principles and techniquesThomas M. Graber, Robert L. Vanarsdall •Five year clinical evaluation of the Andrews S-W applianceRoth •The straight wire appliance 17 years later- Roth •Functional occlusion for orthodontics-Roth-part I II III IV •Straight wire design strategies - five year clinical evaluation of the Roth modification of Andrew SW appliance-Lee W. Graber.
  63. 63. Thank you For more details please visit