Your SlideShare is downloading. ×
  • Like
The Health Professions Council - Mark Potter
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×

Thanks for flagging this SlideShare!

Oops! An error has occurred.

×

Now you can save presentations on your phone or tablet

Available for both IPhone and Android

Text the download link to your phone

Standard text messaging rates apply

The Health Professions Council - Mark Potter

  • 558 views
Published

 

Published in Health & Medicine
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Be the first to comment
    Be the first to like this
No Downloads

Views

Total Views
558
On SlideShare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
1

Actions

Shares
Downloads
2
Comments
0
Likes
0

Embeds 0

No embeds

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
    No notes for slide
  • Title slide instructions
  • This slide is intended to show the diverse groups that the HPC register. Points to mention: Common core of standards so that all groups will benefit from the economies of scale At the same time profession specific standards to recognise what makes each profession unique
  • Title slide instructions
  • Title slide instructions
  • Types of allegations that can consider How the Investigation work – eg demand for information, article 25 powers How Panels are convened Who makes the selection Training of Panels Statutory Framework Adversarial Facts? Impairment? – on next slide Sanction? – on next slide Representation Hearing panels must include a member of the registrant’s profession and a lay person Process identical for all registrants Hearings are open to the public Witnesses HPC seen as independent and impartial
  • Title slide instructions
  • Title slide instructions
  • So if you have any queries about registration that I can’t answer today, or you think of later, here are the contact details for the registration department. Are there any questions?

Transcript

  • 1. The Health Professions Council Tuesday 15 November 2011, Romanian Authorities Study Visit
  • 2. Contents
    • Welcome and Introduction
    • The HPC and the role of a UK regulator
    • Policy at HPC
    • Fitness to practise
    • Stakeholder engagement
    • Registration at HPC
        • Mutual recognition and EEA processes
        • IMI / Security verification
        • Continuing professional development (CPD)
  • 3. Health Professions Council
    • Independent UK statutory regulator of 15 professions
    • One of nine health regulators
    • Derives powers from Health Professions Order 2001
    • Purpose is “ to safeguard the health and well-being of persons using or needing the services of registrants ” – Article 3(4)
    • Separate role from professional bodies and trade unions
  • 4. HPC Register 2011
    • 219,000 registrants from 15 professions
  • 5. Processes and standards The Register
  • 6. Professional and lay input
    • 507 ‘Partners’ working across 677 partner roles
      • – Our professions and lay persons
      • Provide expertise for good decision-making
      • Approval of education and training programmes
      • Registration decisions (applications and CPD audits)
      • Fitness to practise decisions
    • Council and Committees
    • Professional Liaison Groups (PLGs)
  • 7. Policy at the HPC Tuesday 15 November 2011, Romanian Authorities Study Visit
  • 8. About the Policy and Standards Department
    • Develop policy and strategy
    Policy and Standards Consultations
  • 9. Our standards
    • Standards of conduct, performance and ethics: behaviour and attitudes expected
    • Standards of proficiency: professional knowledge, understanding
    • CPD standards: requirements for ongoing learning
    • Standards of Education and Training: we use these to approve education programmes
  • 10. Guidance
    • Explains our policies in more detail
    • Advises registrants and/or students on how they can meet our standards
    • Formal guidance is published
    • Informal guidance (advice):
    • Website
    • Email
    • Phone
    • Meetings
  • 11. The way policy works
    • Responsible for reviewing standards, updating/writing new guidance, or undertaking work on policy change
    • Write papers for Committees and Council to advise them on options
    • Require Committee and Council approval of proposals before consulting – plus legal approval
    • Meet with stakeholders on projects relevant to HPC policy
    • Provide advice on HPC policy to registrants and members of the public
    • Organise and coordinate professional liaison groups to work on policy change as needed
  • 12. Consultations
    • Normally consult for 3 months
    • Information posted online in dedicated ‘consultations’ section of website
    • Also sent to consultation list of over 400 interested organisations.
    • Certain consultations go out to all registrants
    • Respond to external consultations
  • 13. Responses to external consultations
    • Respond to public consultations relevant to our work and our registrants
    • Respond positively where possible, constructively where we disagree with proposals
    • Recent consultations we have responded to:
    • European Commission Green Paper on Modernising the Professional Qualifications Directive
    • House of Lords European Union Committee call for evidence on the Professional Qualifications Directive
  • 14. Fitness to Practise Tuesday 15 November 2011, Romanian Authorities Study Visit
  • 15. Fitness to practise: An overview of the process
    • Allegation made
    • Investigate allegation
    • Interim order imposed
    • Hearing convened
    • Case considered by final
    • hearing panel
    • Sanction imposed
    Allegation Investigation Interim Order Hearing Judgement Mediation
  • 16. Fitness to practise: when we will take action
    • Serious or persistent failure to meet standards
    • Improper relationships with service users
    • Failure to respect the autonomy of service users
    • Sexual misconduct
    • Misuse or abuse of drugs and alcohol
    • Failure to provide adequate care
    • Poor record keeping
    • Theft from a service user
  • 17. Stakeholder engagement Tuesday 15 November 2011, Romanian Authorities Study Visit
  • 18. Stakeholder engagement
    • AURE (Alliance of UK regulators in Europe): Meetings 6x annually, communicating HPC position, debates , contributing to joint statements and consultation responses
    • BMA EU forum : Bi-annual meetings, wide range of organisations represented, debates, communicating HPC position
    • BIS (Department for Business, Innovation and Skills): Developing working relationships, supporting events eg EU Commission London, coordinating HPC responses, data gathering
    • CLEAR (The Council on Licensure, Enforcement and Regulation): Supporting CEO, attending as delegate (London 2011), speaking slot (CPD)
  • 19. Stakeholder engagement
    • EU Commission: Annual meetings with CEO & Policy, developing close working relationships, attending & supporting Commission events eg Modernisation of the Professional Qualifications Directive
    • Supporting International regulators : Cypriot Ministry of Labour, Norwegian government, Hong Kong
    • European Parliament : MEP meetings with CEO, attending IMCO Committee (Internal Market and Consumer Protection Committee), supporting MEP’s assistants
  • 20. Registration at the HPC Tuesday 15 November 2011, Romanian Authorities Study Visit
  • 21. Role of the registration department
    • Maintain and publish a Register of health professionals
    • 36 full time staff
    • 100,000+ telephone enquiries per year
    • 20,000+ email enquiries per year
    • UK approved courses – over 10,000 applications per year
    • Readmission and return to practice process
    • Bi-annual renewal process
    • Audit of continuing professional development (CPD)
    • Verification checks for identity, education and career history of all overseas qualified applicants
  • 22. Routes to registration – all international applicants
    • 180 - 200 International applications received per month (25% are EEA applicants).
    • Forms downloaded from HPC website
    • Applicants advised to read standards of proficiency before applying
    • Incomplete forms returned to applicants with advice
    • Character declarations sent to fitness to practice before assessment
    • Background checks carried out to verify applicant’s identity, education and good standing
    • Use of outside agencies such as UK NARIC and Kroll International for background checks
    • Service level agreement of 10 working days for assessment decisions
  • 23. Routes to registration – international (non-EEA)
    • Applications are sent to two registration assessors from the relevant profession (HPC partners)
    • Assessment based on professional qualification and additional education, training and experience
    • Possible outcomes:
    • Accept – applicants meets all standards of proficiency
    • Further verification – additional information requested to address shortfalls in application
    • Test of competence – interview to determine borderline cases
    • Reject – applicants have automatic right of appeal
  • 24. Routes to registration - EEA applicants with mutual recognition
    • Applications are sent to two registration assessors from the relevant profession (HPC partners)
    • Assessment based on professional comparison and additional education, training and experience
    • Possible outcomes:
    • Accept – applicants meets all standards of proficiency
    • Further verification – additional information requested to address significant shortfalls in application
    • Adaptation period – normally additional supervised practice or academic module. Applicants have automatic right of appeal
    • Aptitude test – can be requested by applicant if they feel adaptation period is not required
  • 25. Role of IMI
    • Currently three HPC professions covered:
        • Physiotherapists, Practitioner psychologists, Radiographers
    • All advisors involved in processing international applications have access to the IMI system
    • Safe and mostly effective way of receiving information
    • Used in both permanent establishment cases (verification process) and in decisions on temporary provision of services cases
    • Increasing use – 10 requests within last 6 months:
        • 7 sent by the HPC (Estonia, Greece, Lithuania, Romania, Spain)
        • 3 received by the HPC (1 from Sweden, 2 from Spain)
  • 26. IMI - our experience
    • Most replies within 1 month, however some take several months to conclude – this means delays in the recognition process and unnecessary obstacles for the applying professional
    • Not all relevant authorities are willing to engage – there is no method of enforcing mandatory use
    • Unclear which authorities can be contacted in some cases (long list to choose from) – lack of explanation who is responsible for what
    • Overview of regulatory systems for each profession would be helpful
    • Still a limited number of regulated professions covered by the ‘general system’
    • Good potential for growth and extended use
  • 27. Assessment process – training issues
    • Assessors receive refresher training every two years regarding developments in legislation
    • All new assessors receive equality and diversity training
    • On-going quality monitoring to ensure recommendations are fair, appropriate and legally sound
    • All refusal and adaptation period recommendations must be approved by registration managers
    • EU Commission has reaffirmed that systematic language testing is ruled out as a condition of recognition
    • Speech and language therapy is the only profession that is exempted from this part of the directive because knowledge of the language is a core competence of the profession
  • 28. Temporary provision of services
  • 29. Post-registration and renewal
    • Name and registration number displayed on the online Register available to the public
    • Registration renewed every two years with declarations of current practice, character, health and CPD
    • £76 fee payable per year
    • Registrants lapse from the Register if they do not renew successfully – must pay and sign
    • Requirement for registrants to keep personal information up to date
    • Registrants must advise of any changes in health or character
    • Over 60% of registrants now renew using online portal
    • Over 95% of registrants successfully renew each cycle
  • 30. Continuing professional development
    • A statutory requirement for all HPC registrants since July 2006
    • Audits began in May 2008
    • Flexible outcome based approach (not points / hours)
  • 31. Questions from HPC
    • Point of contact for regarding for professions regulated by the HPC in Romania
    • Certified/official translators – process for verification
    • For professions currently regulated in Romania which HPC regulates - is there one agreed curriculum? Who is the owner?
    • Status / role of Radiography Nurses - Nurses or Radiology Technicians?
  • 32.
    • Finding out more and getting in touch
    • www.hpc-uk.org
    • [email_address]
    • 0800 328 4218
    • Find us on www.facebook.com/hcpcuk
    • Follow us on www.twitter.com/HPC_news
    • Follow us on www.linkedin.com
    • Sign up for our RSS feeds www.hpc-uk.org