SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 39
Download to read offline
I consume, therefore I am
Rationale for customizing food products
       to consumer unique preferences

             Isabelle Lesschaeve, PhD Ag. Eng.
            FEMA Annual Meeting May 8, 2012
2
There is no ONE consumer
Determinants of Food Preferences and Evolution




Customization
  of the Product Offering
There is no ONE consumer

Three major determinants of food choice and
preference (Rozin, 1991):
  • Biological factors
  • Cultural factors
  • Individual/Psychological factors
Also:
  • Socio-economic environment
        • Context of purchase
        • Heuristics
Biological determinants
Biological Determinants

Innate likes for sweet and dislikes for
  bitter and sour foods (Birch, 1982)


In utero nutrition impacts future child’s
   preference (Schaal, 2006)


Genetics:
   • Gender
   • Sensitivity to PROP
Biological Determinants

Sensory sensitivity
   • Anosmia or hyperosmia
   • Agueusia

   • Decreased sensitivity with aging
Development of Food Preference

 • Preference increases with exposure and familiarity
   (mere exposure theory, Zajonc 1968)

 • Preferences are acquired by associative learning
    • Results in desirable post-digestive consequences

 • Acceptance or Rejection (Rozin, 2007)?
    • Ruled by sensory/hedonic reasons
    • Anticipated consequences
    • Ideational Reasons
Investigating Sensory Preferences


White wine
Sensory Preferences for White Wines
by Canadian Consumers
 Use of preference mapping:
   To describe the sensory landscape available to
    consumers
   To determine the sensory attributes driving likes and
    dislikes for white wine




                                     Lesschaeve et al., in press
Consumer tests - Tasting
 Title Setting
 Sub-headline



• Rate their liking on a scale
                      How much do you like this glass of wine?

          Dislike extremely                          Like extremely
White Wine Preference Map
                                              Observations (axes F1 and F2: 48.18 %)
                   15
                                                  6                             Petroleum
                   10

                          Oak                                        14
                                                                      1              10
                    5
                                                            3
                                                                                                                   Smooth
    Burning                                                                     12             7
                                                                                                      11
                                                                                                                    Liking
                    0
    F2 (12.27 %)




                    -5
                                5                                    18                               9
                                                                                                                   Sweet
                   -10


                                             16                                                                Lychee
                   -15
                                Peas              Pepper                                               Floral
                   -20
                         -25    -20    -15            -10       -5          0         5   10   15         20
                                                                 F1 (35.91 %)                       Lesschaeve et al, 2011)
Segmentation based on Sensory
Preferences


Most marketing professionals are familiar with segmentation
 based on demographics or lifestyles
Segmentation based on Usage and Habits




                             © 2005 Constellation wines US
White Wine Sensory Preference Map
                                              Observations (axes F1 and F2: 48.18 %)
                   15
                                                  6                             Petroleum
                   10

                          Oak                                        14
                                                                      1              10
                                                                                               77%
                    5
                                                            3
                                                                                                                    Smooth
    Burning                                                                     12              7
                                                                                                       11
                                                                                                                     Liking
                    0
    F2 (12.27 %)




                    -5
                                5                                    18                                9
                                                                                                                    Sweet
                   -10


                                             16                                                                 Lychee
                   -15
                                Peas              Pepper                                                Floral
                   -20
                         -25    -20    -15            -10       -5          0         5   10    15         20
                                                                 F1 (35.91 %)                        Lesschaeve et al, 2011)
White Wine Sensory Preference Map

                          Cluster 1        Cluster 2      Total sample
                           (N=92)           (N=28)          (N=120)
          Proportion in
          the total         77 %             23 %            100 %
          sample
          Proportion
          Local Wine        32 %             43 %             34 %
          Drinkers
          Proportion
                                      NS
          Imported Wine     30 %             39 %             32 %
          Drinkers
          Proportion
                            38 %             18 %             33 %
          Millenials

                                                       Lesschaeve et al, in press)
White Wine Sensory Preference Map

                          Cluster 1        Cluster 2      Total sample
                           (N=92)           (N=28)          (N=120)
          Proportion in
          the total         77 %             23 %            100 %
          sample
          Proportion
          Local Wine        32 %             43 %             34 %
          Drinkers
          Proportion
                                      NS
          Imported Wine     30 %             39 %             32 %
          Drinkers
          Proportion
                            38 %             18 %             33 %
          Millenials

                                                       Lesschaeve et al, in press)
Intense Smell and Flavor
                               Some Vanilla                          Chardonnay (USA)
                            Toasted Oak Flavor




Sweet Taste
Fruity Smell
 and Flavor
                                                                                               Alcohol
Smooth
                                                                             H               ISmell and
                   A                                                                           Flavor
                                                                                                 F
                                                                                         J
                                                                                     G
               N                        K                        R
Berry                                                                V                     Lingering
                                                                         W       M
                             O                           T       D                         Aftertaste
                                                     C                   S
                                                             P       E       L           Spicy oak
                                                    Q
                                                                         U

                                               B
Liking
                               Sour Taste
                              Bitter Taste
Lesschaeve et al, 2001        Dry, Puckery
Red Wine Preference Map (USA)
                                                        ASTRINGENT
                      TOASTED OAK


         VANILLA

    W8                     W10                       W12
                                            BACK LPEPPER
                         VISCOUSW9               G3            W13
               BUTTER
              W6        W7
                       W5                                                 W14
                             W4                                W15
              BERRY JAM              W3          HOT
                                                            BITTER AT   BANDAID

SMOOTH                                                 W2                         W16
                                W1
                        RASPBERRY         GRASSY

                                            G2         SMOKY

                                     ASPARAGUS
               G1
SWEET
                                                 CASSIS
                   COOKED FRUIT



                                                                          Lesschaeve et al , 2000
Common Latent Dimensions across
Product Categories

Sensory preferences tend to reflect biology
  • From unripe to ripe (Citrus to tropical)
  • From safe to unsafe (Fruit to Wood/Mineral;
    Sweet to Bitter)
Consumer Preference and Food Choice

                                                        Socio-economic
     Product                  Consumer
                                                            context
                               Perception of
                             sensory attributes
 Physical and chemical                                      Price, availability,
    characteristics                                               brand,
   Nutritional value        Psychological factors:        social-cultural factors
                            Personality, previous
                              experience, mood,
                                beliefs, values

                               Demographics
  Physiological effects:                                    Attitudes towards
                                                            sensory attributes,
 Satiety, hunger, thirst,        Behaviour:                  health/nutrition,
        appetite            Choice/Consumption                 price/quality
                                /Preference


                                                     (Adapted from Shepherd, 1985)
Psychological determinants

Role of Heuristics
Heuristics

Strategies using readily accessible, though loosely applicable,
   information to control problem solving in human beings

Triggers:
   • Package information: price, brand, claims, nutritional facts,
     ingredients, design
   • Beliefs generating attitudes
   • Personal values
   • Motivation
   • Memory
Influence of Information

Sensory preferences for peaches may be altered by
  information
                      10

                       9
                  L
                  i    8
                  k
                  i    7
                  n    6
                  g
                       5                              Blind
                  S                                   Labeled
                       4
                  c
                  o    3
                  r
                  e    2
                  s    1

                       0
                           LNO   LO   INO    IO




                                                    Wu et al, 2012
Liking of the same white wine as a
function of region of origin and price
      2




    1.5




      1




    0.5




      0

             Cluster 1            Cluster 2           Cluster 3
    -0.5




     -1

           Niagara P.   None   Beamsville   None   $13-15   $16-20
              Appellation      Sub-Appellation       Price range
                                                      Lesschaeve et al, 2009
Other heuristics

Effect of a position in a sequence of tastings


                      Low Knowledge              High Knowledge




(Mantonakis et. al, 2009)
Factors Triggering Purchase at POS

Ontario Consumers’ Motivations
for Purchasing Red Wine
Elements tested
Category1: Wine Type                                       Category4: Extrinsic and In Store Cues
Cabernet Franc...the other Cabernet                        Pure sophistication
Meritage... a traditional blend of Cabernet Sauvignon,     With such a strong reputation, this winery's wines must be good
Cabernet Franc and Merlot                                  Experience the charm of the winery through its wines
Pinot Noir… you can taste the terroir in every sip         Funky, bright and colourful.... a wine for life's lighter moments
Gamay Noir… adapts to different wine styles                With a staff pick… your choice is simple
Shiraz or Syrah… same grape, same wine regardless of the   Buy worry free… available for you to sample
name
Made partially or entirely from dried red grapes to        Category5: Beliefs/Values
concentrate the flavours you enjoy                         Worth every penny
                                                           Feel good serving to the people you care about
Category2: Region of Origin
                                                           Reflects your lifestyle and individuality
Product of France
                                                           Great reviews on-line... your buying decision made easy
Product of Australia
                                                           Rich in antioxidants
Product of Chile
                                                           Recommended by family and friends... you are sure to love it
Product of Canada, VQA Prince Edward County
Product of Canada, VQA Niagara Peninsula
                                                           Category6: Quality
Blended from International and Canadian wines
                                                           Great wine, every time... with the taste you expect
Category3: Consumption Occasion                            Taste the quality of craftsmanship from the grape grower to the
Make an evening out with a loved one even more             winemaker
enjoyable                                                  Ruby red with flavours of black currant and a hint of green pepper
A great way to celebrate special occasions                 A full bodied wine with a warm plumy fruit flavour and a little bit of
Sure to impress clients and colleagues alike               dryness
Relaxes you after a busy day                               Pale in colour with a light flavour of raspberries and soft oak notes
A wine to enjoy with friends                               Made in the tradition of the greatest wine producers
A great accompaniment to your meal
Example of vignette
Typing consumers mindset for red wine

Three distinct segments:

• Cool climate enthusiasts (37%) favor cabernet franc and pinot
  noir wines from cool climate regions with rich flavours;

• Social Sippers (23%) are driven by meritage style and value
  wines matching their lifestyle;

• Big red drinkers (40%) who enjoy full bodied wine from
  Australia.
Nice to know there are different consumer
segments. How do we use this information?
Typing consumers mindset for red wine
Typing consumers mindset for red wine
Typing consumers mindset for red wine
Summary
• Biological factors along with individual characteristics moderate
  individual sensory preferences

• Latent dimensions of sensory preference exist across product
  categories

• Psychological and non sensory factors lead consumers to use
  heuristics to help them make a choice

• Knowledge of these factors and how they affect consumers
  decision making enables customization of product offering

• Sensory attributes and non sensory cues need to align to
  maximise consumer experience
Thank You!

Dr. Isabelle Lesschaeve
Isabelle.lesschaeve@vinelandresearch.com
+1 905 562-0320 Ext.769




                     www.vinelandresearch.com

More Related Content

More from Vineland Research and Innovation Centre (8)

AAWE 2009 Branding An Emerging Wine Region
AAWE 2009 Branding An Emerging Wine RegionAAWE 2009 Branding An Emerging Wine Region
AAWE 2009 Branding An Emerging Wine Region
 
IHC 2010 Mindsets For Buying Organic And Local
IHC 2010  Mindsets For Buying Organic And LocalIHC 2010  Mindsets For Buying Organic And Local
IHC 2010 Mindsets For Buying Organic And Local
 
OFVC 2011 TenderFruit session
OFVC 2011 TenderFruit sessionOFVC 2011 TenderFruit session
OFVC 2011 TenderFruit session
 
OFVC 2011 Berry Session
OFVC 2011 Berry SessionOFVC 2011 Berry Session
OFVC 2011 Berry Session
 
Nzwbs Gen Y New
Nzwbs Gen Y NewNzwbs Gen Y New
Nzwbs Gen Y New
 
Nzwbs Sensory preferences
Nzwbs Sensory preferencesNzwbs Sensory preferences
Nzwbs Sensory preferences
 
Vineland Seminar On Consumer Insight Dept
Vineland Seminar On Consumer Insight DeptVineland Seminar On Consumer Insight Dept
Vineland Seminar On Consumer Insight Dept
 
Wac 2008
Wac 2008Wac 2008
Wac 2008
 

103 Fema Lesschaeve

  • 1. I consume, therefore I am Rationale for customizing food products to consumer unique preferences Isabelle Lesschaeve, PhD Ag. Eng. FEMA Annual Meeting May 8, 2012
  • 2. 2
  • 3. There is no ONE consumer
  • 4. Determinants of Food Preferences and Evolution Customization of the Product Offering
  • 5. There is no ONE consumer Three major determinants of food choice and preference (Rozin, 1991): • Biological factors • Cultural factors • Individual/Psychological factors Also: • Socio-economic environment • Context of purchase • Heuristics
  • 7. Biological Determinants Innate likes for sweet and dislikes for bitter and sour foods (Birch, 1982) In utero nutrition impacts future child’s preference (Schaal, 2006) Genetics: • Gender • Sensitivity to PROP
  • 8. Biological Determinants Sensory sensitivity • Anosmia or hyperosmia • Agueusia • Decreased sensitivity with aging
  • 9. Development of Food Preference • Preference increases with exposure and familiarity (mere exposure theory, Zajonc 1968) • Preferences are acquired by associative learning • Results in desirable post-digestive consequences • Acceptance or Rejection (Rozin, 2007)? • Ruled by sensory/hedonic reasons • Anticipated consequences • Ideational Reasons
  • 11. Sensory Preferences for White Wines by Canadian Consumers  Use of preference mapping:  To describe the sensory landscape available to consumers  To determine the sensory attributes driving likes and dislikes for white wine Lesschaeve et al., in press
  • 12. Consumer tests - Tasting Title Setting Sub-headline • Rate their liking on a scale How much do you like this glass of wine? Dislike extremely Like extremely
  • 13. White Wine Preference Map Observations (axes F1 and F2: 48.18 %) 15 6 Petroleum 10 Oak 14 1 10 5 3 Smooth Burning 12 7 11 Liking 0 F2 (12.27 %) -5 5 18 9 Sweet -10 16 Lychee -15 Peas Pepper Floral -20 -25 -20 -15 -10 -5 0 5 10 15 20 F1 (35.91 %) Lesschaeve et al, 2011)
  • 14. Segmentation based on Sensory Preferences Most marketing professionals are familiar with segmentation based on demographics or lifestyles
  • 15. Segmentation based on Usage and Habits © 2005 Constellation wines US
  • 16. White Wine Sensory Preference Map Observations (axes F1 and F2: 48.18 %) 15 6 Petroleum 10 Oak 14 1 10 77% 5 3 Smooth Burning 12 7 11 Liking 0 F2 (12.27 %) -5 5 18 9 Sweet -10 16 Lychee -15 Peas Pepper Floral -20 -25 -20 -15 -10 -5 0 5 10 15 20 F1 (35.91 %) Lesschaeve et al, 2011)
  • 17. White Wine Sensory Preference Map Cluster 1 Cluster 2 Total sample (N=92) (N=28) (N=120) Proportion in the total 77 % 23 % 100 % sample Proportion Local Wine 32 % 43 % 34 % Drinkers Proportion NS Imported Wine 30 % 39 % 32 % Drinkers Proportion 38 % 18 % 33 % Millenials Lesschaeve et al, in press)
  • 18. White Wine Sensory Preference Map Cluster 1 Cluster 2 Total sample (N=92) (N=28) (N=120) Proportion in the total 77 % 23 % 100 % sample Proportion Local Wine 32 % 43 % 34 % Drinkers Proportion NS Imported Wine 30 % 39 % 32 % Drinkers Proportion 38 % 18 % 33 % Millenials Lesschaeve et al, in press)
  • 19. Intense Smell and Flavor Some Vanilla Chardonnay (USA) Toasted Oak Flavor Sweet Taste Fruity Smell and Flavor Alcohol Smooth H ISmell and A Flavor F J G N K R Berry V Lingering W M O T D Aftertaste C S P E L Spicy oak Q U B Liking Sour Taste Bitter Taste Lesschaeve et al, 2001 Dry, Puckery
  • 20. Red Wine Preference Map (USA) ASTRINGENT TOASTED OAK VANILLA W8 W10 W12 BACK LPEPPER VISCOUSW9 G3 W13 BUTTER W6 W7 W5 W14 W4 W15 BERRY JAM W3 HOT BITTER AT BANDAID SMOOTH W2 W16 W1 RASPBERRY GRASSY G2 SMOKY ASPARAGUS G1 SWEET CASSIS COOKED FRUIT Lesschaeve et al , 2000
  • 21. Common Latent Dimensions across Product Categories Sensory preferences tend to reflect biology • From unripe to ripe (Citrus to tropical) • From safe to unsafe (Fruit to Wood/Mineral; Sweet to Bitter)
  • 22. Consumer Preference and Food Choice Socio-economic Product Consumer context Perception of sensory attributes Physical and chemical Price, availability, characteristics brand, Nutritional value Psychological factors: social-cultural factors Personality, previous experience, mood, beliefs, values Demographics Physiological effects: Attitudes towards sensory attributes, Satiety, hunger, thirst, Behaviour: health/nutrition, appetite Choice/Consumption price/quality /Preference (Adapted from Shepherd, 1985)
  • 24. Heuristics Strategies using readily accessible, though loosely applicable, information to control problem solving in human beings Triggers: • Package information: price, brand, claims, nutritional facts, ingredients, design • Beliefs generating attitudes • Personal values • Motivation • Memory
  • 25. Influence of Information Sensory preferences for peaches may be altered by information 10 9 L i 8 k i 7 n 6 g 5 Blind S Labeled 4 c o 3 r e 2 s 1 0 LNO LO INO IO Wu et al, 2012
  • 26. Liking of the same white wine as a function of region of origin and price 2 1.5 1 0.5 0 Cluster 1 Cluster 2 Cluster 3 -0.5 -1 Niagara P. None Beamsville None $13-15 $16-20 Appellation Sub-Appellation Price range Lesschaeve et al, 2009
  • 27. Other heuristics Effect of a position in a sequence of tastings Low Knowledge High Knowledge (Mantonakis et. al, 2009)
  • 28. Factors Triggering Purchase at POS Ontario Consumers’ Motivations for Purchasing Red Wine
  • 29. Elements tested Category1: Wine Type Category4: Extrinsic and In Store Cues Cabernet Franc...the other Cabernet Pure sophistication Meritage... a traditional blend of Cabernet Sauvignon, With such a strong reputation, this winery's wines must be good Cabernet Franc and Merlot Experience the charm of the winery through its wines Pinot Noir… you can taste the terroir in every sip Funky, bright and colourful.... a wine for life's lighter moments Gamay Noir… adapts to different wine styles With a staff pick… your choice is simple Shiraz or Syrah… same grape, same wine regardless of the Buy worry free… available for you to sample name Made partially or entirely from dried red grapes to Category5: Beliefs/Values concentrate the flavours you enjoy Worth every penny Feel good serving to the people you care about Category2: Region of Origin Reflects your lifestyle and individuality Product of France Great reviews on-line... your buying decision made easy Product of Australia Rich in antioxidants Product of Chile Recommended by family and friends... you are sure to love it Product of Canada, VQA Prince Edward County Product of Canada, VQA Niagara Peninsula Category6: Quality Blended from International and Canadian wines Great wine, every time... with the taste you expect Category3: Consumption Occasion Taste the quality of craftsmanship from the grape grower to the Make an evening out with a loved one even more winemaker enjoyable Ruby red with flavours of black currant and a hint of green pepper A great way to celebrate special occasions A full bodied wine with a warm plumy fruit flavour and a little bit of Sure to impress clients and colleagues alike dryness Relaxes you after a busy day Pale in colour with a light flavour of raspberries and soft oak notes A wine to enjoy with friends Made in the tradition of the greatest wine producers A great accompaniment to your meal
  • 31. Typing consumers mindset for red wine Three distinct segments: • Cool climate enthusiasts (37%) favor cabernet franc and pinot noir wines from cool climate regions with rich flavours; • Social Sippers (23%) are driven by meritage style and value wines matching their lifestyle; • Big red drinkers (40%) who enjoy full bodied wine from Australia.
  • 32. Nice to know there are different consumer segments. How do we use this information?
  • 33. Typing consumers mindset for red wine
  • 34. Typing consumers mindset for red wine
  • 35. Typing consumers mindset for red wine
  • 36.
  • 37.
  • 38. Summary • Biological factors along with individual characteristics moderate individual sensory preferences • Latent dimensions of sensory preference exist across product categories • Psychological and non sensory factors lead consumers to use heuristics to help them make a choice • Knowledge of these factors and how they affect consumers decision making enables customization of product offering • Sensory attributes and non sensory cues need to align to maximise consumer experience
  • 39. Thank You! Dr. Isabelle Lesschaeve Isabelle.lesschaeve@vinelandresearch.com +1 905 562-0320 Ext.769 www.vinelandresearch.com