2007 Dual Use Defense Info Briefing - Feb 26 2007

Loading...

Flash Player 9 (or above) is needed to view presentations.
We have detected that you do not have it on your computer. To install it, go here.

0 comments

Post a comment

    Post a comment
    Embed Video
    Edit your comment Cancel

    Favorites, Groups & Events

    2007 Dual Use Defense Info Briefing - Feb 26 2007 - Presentation Transcript

    1.  
    2. Dual Use Hawaii’s Innovation Industry February 26, 2007 Joint Information Briefing
      • Economic Development & Business Concerns
      • Rep. Kyle T. Yamashita , Chair
      • Rep. Glenn Wakai , Vice-Chair
      • Rep. Lyla B. Berg
      • Rep. Tom Brower
      • Rep. Jerry L. Chang
      • Rep. Faye P. Hanohano
      • Rep. Robert N. Herkes
      • Rep. Joey Manahan
      • Rep. Clift Tsuji
      • Rep. Ryan I. Yamane
      • Rep. Corinne W.L. Ching
      • Rep. Barbara C. Marumoto
      Economic Development & Taxation Senator Carol Fukunaga, Chair Senator Will Espero, Vice-Chair Senator J. Kalani English Senator David Y. Ige Senator Sam Slom
    3. Panelists
      • Jennifer Goto-Sabas, Chief of Staff, Senator Daniel K. Inouye
      • Jeanne Unemori-Skog, President & CEO, Maui Economic Development Board
      • Tom Cooper, Chair, Kauai Economic Development Board
      • Jan Sullivan, COO, Oceanit
      • Keith Matsumoto, Technical Director, HTDV
      • Ed Young, Program Manager HTDV, Enterprise Honolulu
      • Dr. Pat Sullivan, Founder & CEO, Hoana Medical
      • Larry Lieberman, Communications Director, Referentia Systems
      • Monte Littlefield, Founder & CEO, Pipeline Communications
      • Dr. Rob Yonover, Founder & CEO, See Rescue Technologies
      • Tareq Hoque, Founder & CEO, Concentris Systems
      • Ian Kitajima, Dual Use Network
    4. Agenda
      • Introductions
      • What's Dual Use?
      • Why should you care about Dual Use?
      • What’s needed to create an innovation economy?
      • What’s missing?
      • Q&A
    5. What’s Dual Use?
      • Dual Use – Refers to technology which has more than one use. Hawaii’s dual use companies have used Federal grant funding to develop state-of-the-art technologies.
      • Dual Use is Hawaii’s Innovation Industry
      • Innovation industries are driven by ideas , people , Capital, & companies
      Ian PEOPLE CAPITAL IDEAS COMPANIES
    6. Why Should You Care?
      • $4B in the last 10 years in support to Hawaii’s economy
      • Fast growing segment of tech
        • 739% growth in contracts
        • 73% growth in grants
      • Rank 24 th in SBIR grant funding, from last, with minimum State $s
      • Over 100 companies and growing
      • Average salary $54K vs. $42K median income
      Ian Sources: HIPA 2005 Policy Review; University of Hawaii OTTED, U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of Economic Analysis; U.S. Department of Commerce, Census Bureau; National Science Foundation/Science Resources Study Division; U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics; Milken Institute; National Venture Capital Association; U.S. Patent & Trademark Of.ce; U.S. Of.ce of Management & Budget; U.S. Small Business Administration.
    7. Ingredients for an Innovation Economy Jennifer PEOPLE CAPITAL IDEAS COMPANIES
    8. Federal Investment in Hawaii’s Ideas
      • $323.5M
      • 63 RDT&E Projects
      • in 2005
      Source: Enterprise Honolulu Defense & Dual Use Strategic Plan Jennifer
    9. Federal Funding from HTDV in Ideas Hawaii Technology Development Venture 3 years 45 projects $13M Keith/Ed
    10. Ideas to Commercialization Technological Risk Ed/Keith Valley of Death Capital Requirements Product Development Hawaii Technology Development Venture State Tech Grants SBIR II / STTR Angels-Act215 Venture Capital Commercialization Institutional Investors-ERS Oahu Technology & Innovation Center KEDB & MEDB State Innovation Fund Self Funds Angels-Act215 Incubation SBIR I HTDC Incubators MIC & MRTC Government Support Private Sector Support
    11. Ingredients for an Innovation Economy Jeanne PEOPLE CAPITAL IDEAS COMPANIES
    12. People – Workforce Development
      • Maui Economic Development Board
      • Kauai Economic Development Board
      • Hawaii Economic Development Board
      • Enterprise Honolulu
      Jeanne/Tom
    13. Ingredients for an Innovation Economy Patrick PEOPLE CAPITAL IDEAS COMPANIES
    14. What’s Missing? Turning ideas Into Products and Companies Patrick IDEAS via Federal Funding PRODUCTS >SB1688< Valley of Death COMPANIES via Act 215 Venture Capital
    15. Ingredients for an Innovation Economy Ian PEOPLE CAPITAL IDEAS COMPANIES
    16. Company Stories
      • Established
        • Referentia Systems
        • Oceanit
        • See Rescue
      • Startups
        • Pipeline Communication & Technology
        • Concentris Systems
        • Hoana Medical
    17. Supported Concepts
      • Matching grants
        • 3 rd Party Validation. Projects are vetted
        • Leverages federal $$$s
        • SB1688/HB1666 (Technology Grants)
      • Incentives like Act 215 that allows direct investments by investors into companies (bypass Venture Capital gatekeepers), and transparency for the public
        • Allows companies and investors to deal direct. No middlemen. No single person or organization should control the investment flow. No politics.
        • SB898: Annual DoTax report on QHTBs and effectiveness of tax credits.
      • Keep Act 215 alive, and intact!
      Ian
    18. Data Slides
    19. Example of Defense / Dual Use Co’s
      • Kauai:
      • Trex Enterprises Corporation
      • Oceanit
      • SAIC
      • Advance Fusion
      • Maui:
      • Ambient Micro
      • Trex Enterprises Corporation
      • Akimeka, LLC
      • Lockheed Martin
      • SAIC
      • Peletex, Inc.
      • Big Island:
      • Kona Labs
      • Hawaii Oceanic Technologies
      • Carpin-Force Microelectronics
      • Oahu:
      • Pipeline Communications
      • BAE Systems
      • SAIC
      • Oceanit
      • Referentia Systems
      • Pacific Marine/Navatek
      • Trex
      • Omega
      • Oceantronics
      • Williams Aerospace
      • See Rescue Technologies
      • Cellular Bioengineering
      • 21 st Century Software
      • Pukoa
      • Progeny
      • Applied Marine
    20. Federal Investment in Hawaii’s Ideas
      • $4B
      • RDT&E* 10 yrs
      • *Research, Development, Test & Evaluation
      Source: Enterprise Honolulu Defense & Dual Use Strategic Plan
    21. Defense/Dual Use in Hawaii Sources: HIPA 2005 Policy Review; University of Hawaii OTTED, U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of Economic Analysis; U.S. Department of Commerce, Census Bureau; National Science Foundation/Science Resources Study Division; U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics; Milken Institute; National Venture Capital Association; U.S. Patent & Trademark Of.ce; U.S. Of.ce of Management & Budget; U.S. Small Business Administration.  49th 75 / yr Patent Activity  47th 1? Businesses created from UH R&D (2000-2002)  24th $3.5M / yr SBIR grant funding  15th 65 / yr Scientists & Engineers % of WF  ~ 80+ No. of Defense D/U Companies Trend Rank 2003
      • QHTB salaries ($112,683,520)
        • 327% more than credits claimed during last 4 years (p. 30, Table 2)
      • QHTB expenditures ($263,286,379)
        • 764% more than credits claimed during last 4 years (p. 30, Table 2)
      • QHTB gross revenue generated ($51,625,758, ’03 only )
        • 149% more than credits claimed in 2003 (p. 31, Table 4)
      Effects of Act 215 (’02, ’03)
    22. Job Creation of Act 215
      • $44K 1 vs. $83K 2
      • investment creates 1 innovation job in Hawaii compared to Silicon Valley
      • 1 $60.32M credits claimed from 2000-’03 divided by 1,378 high tech jobs in existence at the end of 2003. Figures less performing arts investment & jobs.
      • 2 $60.5B in venture capital invested from 2000-’03 in Silicon Valley divided by 725,400 tech jobs in existence at the end of 2003. Source: PWC Moneytree Report
    23. But Hawaii Startups Under-funded
      • $900K 1 vs. $12M 2
      • investment per startup in Hawaii compared to Silicon Valley
      • 1 $60.32M credits claimed from 2000-’03 divided by 67 QHTBs in existence at the end of 2003. Figures less performing arts investment & jobs.
      • 2 $60.5B in venture capital invested from 2000-’03 in Silicon Valley divided by 4884 tech startups during the same time period. Source: PWC Moneytree Report
    24. 2005 Venture Investment Per Deal $0.9M $6.6M $7.35M $5.4M $6.6M $10M HI ‘03 Ireland Germany UK Israel U.S.
    25. How Act 215 Auto-Corrects
      • If I move my QHTB out of state, can I still claim the R&D tax credit, and can my investors still claim the investment tax credit?
        • Answer is NO to both questions. The majority of the R&D must be performed in Hawaii
      • Can I can avoid spending my investors’ investment, and my investors can still claim their investment tax credit?
        • NO …the company will lose its QHTB status, and thus investors will lose their investment tax credit, and be subject to recapture
      • I heard there is no risk to investors when they are getting a 100% tax credit?
        • NO ….because an investor does NOT get his entire investment tax credit in the first year – the credit is spread over five years, during which the company could go bankrupt, and thus the investor would lose the credits for the remain years.

    + Ian KitajimaIan Kitajima, 2 years ago

    custom

    517 views, 0 favs, 0 embeds more stats

    More info about this document

    © All Rights Reserved

    Go to text version

    • Total Views 517
      • 517 on SlideShare
      • 0 from embeds
    • Comments 0
    • Favorites 0
    • Downloads 8
    Most viewed embeds

    more

    All embeds

    less

    Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
    Flag as inappropriate

    Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate. If needed, use the feedback form to let us know more details.

    Cancel
    File a copyright complaint
    Having problems? Go to our helpdesk?

    Categories