2007 Dual Use Defense Info Briefing - Feb 26 2007 - Presentation Transcript
Dual Use Hawaii’s Innovation Industry February 26, 2007 Joint Information Briefing
Economic Development & Business Concerns
Rep. Kyle T. Yamashita , Chair
Rep. Glenn Wakai , Vice-Chair
Rep. Lyla B. Berg
Rep. Tom Brower
Rep. Jerry L. Chang
Rep. Faye P. Hanohano
Rep. Robert N. Herkes
Rep. Joey Manahan
Rep. Clift Tsuji
Rep. Ryan I. Yamane
Rep. Corinne W.L. Ching
Rep. Barbara C. Marumoto
Economic Development & Taxation Senator Carol Fukunaga, Chair Senator Will Espero, Vice-Chair Senator J. Kalani English Senator David Y. Ige Senator Sam Slom
Panelists
Jennifer Goto-Sabas, Chief of Staff, Senator Daniel K. Inouye
Jeanne Unemori-Skog, President & CEO, Maui Economic Development Board
Tom Cooper, Chair, Kauai Economic Development Board
Jan Sullivan, COO, Oceanit
Keith Matsumoto, Technical Director, HTDV
Ed Young, Program Manager HTDV, Enterprise Honolulu
Dr. Pat Sullivan, Founder & CEO, Hoana Medical
Larry Lieberman, Communications Director, Referentia Systems
Monte Littlefield, Founder & CEO, Pipeline Communications
Dr. Rob Yonover, Founder & CEO, See Rescue Technologies
Tareq Hoque, Founder & CEO, Concentris Systems
Ian Kitajima, Dual Use Network
Agenda
Introductions
What's Dual Use?
Why should you care about Dual Use?
What’s needed to create an innovation economy?
What’s missing?
Q&A
What’s Dual Use?
Dual Use – Refers to technology which has more than one use. Hawaii’s dual use companies have used Federal grant funding to develop state-of-the-art technologies.
Dual Use is Hawaii’s Innovation Industry
Innovation industries are driven by ideas , people , Capital, & companies
Ian PEOPLE CAPITAL IDEAS COMPANIES
Why Should You Care?
$4B in the last 10 years in support to Hawaii’s economy
Fast growing segment of tech
739% growth in contracts
73% growth in grants
Rank 24 th in SBIR grant funding, from last, with minimum State $s
Over 100 companies and growing
Average salary $54K vs. $42K median income
Ian Sources: HIPA 2005 Policy Review; University of Hawaii OTTED, U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of Economic Analysis; U.S. Department of Commerce, Census Bureau; National Science Foundation/Science Resources Study Division; U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics; Milken Institute; National Venture Capital Association; U.S. Patent & Trademark Of.ce; U.S. Of.ce of Management & Budget; U.S. Small Business Administration.
Ingredients for an Innovation Economy Jennifer PEOPLE CAPITAL IDEAS COMPANIES
Federal Investment in Hawaii’s Ideas
$323.5M
63 RDT&E Projects
in 2005
Source: Enterprise Honolulu Defense & Dual Use Strategic Plan Jennifer
Federal Funding from HTDV in Ideas Hawaii Technology Development Venture 3 years 45 projects $13M Keith/Ed
Ideas to Commercialization Technological Risk Ed/Keith Valley of Death Capital Requirements Product Development Hawaii Technology Development Venture State Tech Grants SBIR II / STTR Angels-Act215 Venture Capital Commercialization Institutional Investors-ERS Oahu Technology & Innovation Center KEDB & MEDB State Innovation Fund Self Funds Angels-Act215 Incubation SBIR I HTDC Incubators MIC & MRTC Government Support Private Sector Support
Ingredients for an Innovation Economy Jeanne PEOPLE CAPITAL IDEAS COMPANIES
People – Workforce Development
Maui Economic Development Board
Kauai Economic Development Board
Hawaii Economic Development Board
Enterprise Honolulu
Jeanne/Tom
Ingredients for an Innovation Economy Patrick PEOPLE CAPITAL IDEAS COMPANIES
What’s Missing? Turning ideas Into Products and Companies Patrick IDEAS via Federal Funding PRODUCTS >SB1688< Valley of Death COMPANIES via Act 215 Venture Capital
Ingredients for an Innovation Economy Ian PEOPLE CAPITAL IDEAS COMPANIES
Company Stories
Established
Referentia Systems
Oceanit
See Rescue
Startups
Pipeline Communication & Technology
Concentris Systems
Hoana Medical
Supported Concepts
Matching grants
3 rd Party Validation. Projects are vetted
Leverages federal $$$s
SB1688/HB1666 (Technology Grants)
Incentives like Act 215 that allows direct investments by investors into companies (bypass Venture Capital gatekeepers), and transparency for the public
Allows companies and investors to deal direct. No middlemen. No single person or organization should control the investment flow. No politics.
SB898: Annual DoTax report on QHTBs and effectiveness of tax credits.
Keep Act 215 alive, and intact!
Ian
Data Slides
Example of Defense / Dual Use Co’s
Kauai:
Trex Enterprises Corporation
Oceanit
SAIC
Advance Fusion
Maui:
Ambient Micro
Trex Enterprises Corporation
Akimeka, LLC
Lockheed Martin
SAIC
Peletex, Inc.
Big Island:
Kona Labs
Hawaii Oceanic Technologies
Carpin-Force Microelectronics
Oahu:
Pipeline Communications
BAE Systems
SAIC
Oceanit
Referentia Systems
Pacific Marine/Navatek
Trex
Omega
Oceantronics
Williams Aerospace
See Rescue Technologies
Cellular Bioengineering
21 st Century Software
Pukoa
Progeny
Applied Marine
Federal Investment in Hawaii’s Ideas
$4B
RDT&E* 10 yrs
*Research, Development, Test & Evaluation
Source: Enterprise Honolulu Defense & Dual Use Strategic Plan
Defense/Dual Use in Hawaii Sources: HIPA 2005 Policy Review; University of Hawaii OTTED, U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of Economic Analysis; U.S. Department of Commerce, Census Bureau; National Science Foundation/Science Resources Study Division; U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics; Milken Institute; National Venture Capital Association; U.S. Patent & Trademark Of.ce; U.S. Of.ce of Management & Budget; U.S. Small Business Administration. 49th 75 / yr Patent Activity 47th 1? Businesses created from UH R&D (2000-2002) 24th $3.5M / yr SBIR grant funding 15th 65 / yr Scientists & Engineers % of WF ~ 80+ No. of Defense D/U Companies Trend Rank 2003
QHTB salaries ($112,683,520)
327% more than credits claimed during last 4 years (p. 30, Table 2)
QHTB expenditures ($263,286,379)
764% more than credits claimed during last 4 years (p. 30, Table 2)
QHTB gross revenue generated ($51,625,758, ’03 only )
149% more than credits claimed in 2003 (p. 31, Table 4)
Effects of Act 215 (’02, ’03)
Job Creation of Act 215
$44K 1 vs. $83K 2
investment creates 1 innovation job in Hawaii compared to Silicon Valley
1 $60.32M credits claimed from 2000-’03 divided by 1,378 high tech jobs in existence at the end of 2003. Figures less performing arts investment & jobs.
2 $60.5B in venture capital invested from 2000-’03 in Silicon Valley divided by 725,400 tech jobs in existence at the end of 2003. Source: PWC Moneytree Report
But Hawaii Startups Under-funded
$900K 1 vs. $12M 2
investment per startup in Hawaii compared to Silicon Valley
1 $60.32M credits claimed from 2000-’03 divided by 67 QHTBs in existence at the end of 2003. Figures less performing arts investment & jobs.
2 $60.5B in venture capital invested from 2000-’03 in Silicon Valley divided by 4884 tech startups during the same time period. Source: PWC Moneytree Report
2005 Venture Investment Per Deal $0.9M $6.6M $7.35M $5.4M $6.6M $10M HI ‘03 Ireland Germany UK Israel U.S.
How Act 215 Auto-Corrects
If I move my QHTB out of state, can I still claim the R&D tax credit, and can my investors still claim the investment tax credit?
Answer is NO to both questions. The majority of the R&D must be performed in Hawaii
Can I can avoid spending my investors’ investment, and my investors can still claim their investment tax credit?
NO …the company will lose its QHTB status, and thus investors will lose their investment tax credit, and be subject to recapture
I heard there is no risk to investors when they are getting a 100% tax credit?
NO ….because an investor does NOT get his entire investment tax credit in the first year – the credit is spread over five years, during which the company could go bankrupt, and thus the investor would lose the credits for the remain years.
0 comments
Post a comment