Your SlideShare is downloading. ×
Kg2518001805
Kg2518001805
Kg2518001805
Kg2518001805
Kg2518001805
Kg2518001805
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×

Thanks for flagging this SlideShare!

Oops! An error has occurred.

×
Saving this for later? Get the SlideShare app to save on your phone or tablet. Read anywhere, anytime – even offline.
Text the download link to your phone
Standard text messaging rates apply

Kg2518001805

158

Published on

IJERA (International journal of Engineering Research and Applications) is International online, ... peer reviewed journal. For more detail or submit your article, please visit www.ijera.com

IJERA (International journal of Engineering Research and Applications) is International online, ... peer reviewed journal. For more detail or submit your article, please visit www.ijera.com

0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total Views
158
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
0
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
1
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

Report content
Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
No notes for slide

Transcript

  • 1. K V Dinesh Kumar, B Swathi, K Suresh, M Suneetha Rani / International Journal of Engineering Research and Applications (IJERA) ISSN: 2248-9622 www.ijera.com Vol. 2, Issue 5, September- October 2012, pp.1800-1805 Efficient Data Transmission with Priority in Heterogeneous Networks K V DINESH KUMAR,M-Tech(DECS) B SWATHI,M-TECH(DECS) Chaitanya Engineerin Colege, Vizag Chaitanya Engineerin Colege,Vizag K SURESH, M-Tech M SUNEETHA RANI M-Tech(DECS) Chaitanya Engineerin Colege, Vizag Chaitanya Engineerin Colege, VizagABSTRACT In wireless networking domain, diverse supports services such as car collision avoidancewireless technologies are utilized for sharing data and road safety by exchanging warning messagesand providing data services. The protocols used across vehicles [5].Internetworking over VANETsin VANETs are DYMO and AODV+. Both of has been gaining a great deal of momentum over thethem can provide internet by communicating past few years. Its increasing importance has beenwith Road Side Units (RSUs) which are static. recognized by major car manufacturers,This application has performed well, still leaving governmental organizations and the academicsome challenges for the designers to be met in community. The Federal Communicationsadvancements. In this work, a novel architecture Commission has allocated spectrum for Inter-3G/UMTS networks are integrated with VANET Vehicle Communications (IVC) and similarnetworks in which a minimum number of applications (e.g., wireless access in vehiclegateways, per time instance are selected to environment).connect ordinary vehicles with the UMTSnetwork. In this paper, the enhanced version of IEEE In the proposed architecture, AODV is 802.11networks, which is IEEE 802.11p, forms theused in forming a VANET and a radio link to standards for Wireless Access for Vehicularconnect a VANET to 3G/UMTS base station Environments (WAVE). It operates at a frequencythrough a gateway. There is an instance, where a of 5.9 GHz, divided into 7 channels, each operatingnode must be given priority. The gateway must at a frequency of 10 MHz. It provides a high datagive highest priority in serving priority needed rate, ranging from 6 Mbps to 27 Mbps and anode by broadcasting about the arrival of vehicle shortrange radio communication of approximatelyand requesting the remaining nodes in a VANET 300 meters.to clear the road for a while. Simulation is By integrating VANET with UMTS, highcarried out for priority node and priority-less data rate can be coupled with wide-range ofnode and better results are obtained. communication. In the envisioned VANET/3G network, if one vehicle is connected to the UMTSIndex Terms--VANET, 3G, UMTS, AODV, network using its 3G UTRAN interface, it can serveAODV+, DYMO, RSU. as a relay node (i.e., mobile gateway) for other vehicles in its vicinity to access the UMTS network,I. INTRODUCTION by receiving data from them (using its IEEE In today’s wireless networking domain, 802.11p interface) and relaying the data to thediverse wireless technologies are utilized for sharing UMTS network. With such an integration, deaddata and providing data services. Among the spots in UMTS can be minimized to a significantavailable technologies, the leading examples are the extent.widely-deployed 3G cellular networks and IEEE802.11-based Vehicular Ad hoc Networks II. REVIEW OF EXISTING SYTEMS(VANETs). 3G cellular networks, such as Universal As already given in the abstract threeMobile Telecommunication Systems (UMTS), are important protocols are used in forming a VANET.pre-dominantly used for wide-area wireless data and They are DYMO, AODV+ and AODV. Let’s see aNode B. On the other hand, VANETs are used for brief discussion about the three protocols.shortrange, high-speed communication amongnearby A. DYMO (Dynamic MANET On demandvehicles, and between vehicles and roadside routing protocol)infrastructure units [1]. voice services via access to a The Dynamic MANET On-demand routingBase Station Transceiver (BST), also referred to as protocol (DYMO) is a newly proposed protocolUMTS Vehicle-to-Vehicle (V2V) communication currently defined in an IETF Internet-Draft [9] in its 1800 | P a g e
  • 2. K V Dinesh Kumar, B Swathi, K Suresh, M Suneetha Rani / International Journal of Engineering Research and Applications (IJERA) ISSN: 2248-9622 www.ijera.com Vol. 2, Issue 5, September- October 2012, pp.1800-1805twenty-first revision and is still work in progress. Hybrid gateway discovery. In pro-active gatewayDYMO is a successor of the AODV routing discovery, gateway periodically broadcast a gatewayprotocol. It operates similarly to AODV. DYMO advertisement (GWADV)message to all the mobiledoes not add extra features or extend the AODV nodes. The mobile node that receives theprotocol, but rather simplifies it, while retaining the advertisement creates a route entry for the gatewaybasic mode of operation. As is the case with all and then sends the acknowledgment back toreactive ad hoc routing protocols, DYMO consists gateway. To avoid duplication of advertisementof two protocol operations: route discovery and GWADV ID Field is used with message .In reactiveroute maintenance. Routes are discovered on gateway discovery process is initiated by mobiledemand when a node needs to send a packet to a nodes. This mobile node broadcast RREQ messagedestination currently not in its routing table. A route to all nearby gateway. Intermediate mobile nodesrequest message is flooded in the network using are not allowed to process RREQ message. Whenbroadcast and if the packet reaches its destination, a RREQ message is received by gateway it uni-castsreply message is sent back containing the the RREP to mobile nodes.discovered, accumulated path. Each entry in therouting table consists of the following fields: III. Clustering based Multi-metric mobileDestination Address, Sequence Number, Hop Gateway Management mechanismCount, Next Hop Address, Next Hop Interface, Is The proposed priority concept can beGateway, Prefix, Valid Timeout, and Delete understood from the following figure.Timeout.B. AODV (Ad Hoc On-Demand Distance-Vector Routing Protocol) The AODV Routing Protocol [8] provideson-demand route discovery in mobile ad hocnetworks. Like most reactive routing protocols,route finding is based on a route discovery cycleinvolving a broadcast network search and a uni-castreply containing discovered paths. AODV relies onper-node sequence numbers for loop freedom andfor ensuring selection of the most recent routingpath. AODV nodes maintain a route table in whichnext-hop routing information for destination nodes Figure 2: Proposed Architectureis stored. Each routing table entry has an associated CMGM protocol works depending on threelifetime value. If a route is not utilized within the main metrics for clustering and two algorithms forlifetime period, the route is expired otherwise, each gateway management. The three metrics are:time the route is used, the lifetime period is updated a. Direction of Movementso that the route is not prematurely deleted. b. UMTS Signal Strength c. IEEE 802.11p wireless transmission range. A. Multi-metric Mobile Gateway Selection Mechanism (algorithm 1) It is employed upon the available CHs of the GWC sub-cluster. The algorithm is based on the Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) technique. The considered metrics of the CH are the mobility speed, the UMTS RSS, and the link stability. The link stability is defined by the LET and RET metricsFigure 1: path establishment in AODV and DYMO between the source and the CH. At a certain time instance, let (xi, yi, zi) and (xj, yj, zj) denote the Cartesian coordinates of two neighboring vehicles iC. AODV+ Protocol and j, moving at speeds vi and vj , along two roads AODV is modified to support mobile inclined at θi and θj (0 < θi, θj < 2π) with respect todevices in network to communicate with fixed the x-axis, respectively. Let R denote the maximumdevices in Internet. This modified addition if AODV wireless transmission range of the IEEE 802.11pis known as AODV+. For the Internet access interface of the two vehicles. LETij canAODV+ has to discovery gateway. This gateway be then computed as in Equation (5).discovery is classified into three types: Pro-activegateway discovery, Reactive gateway discovery and 1801 | P a g e
  • 3. K V Dinesh Kumar, B Swathi, K Suresh, M Suneetha Rani / International Journal of Engineering Research and Applications (IJERA) ISSN: 2248-9622 www.ijera.com Vol. 2, Issue 5, September- October 2012, pp.1800-1805 − a𝑏 +𝑐𝑑 + a 2 +c 2 𝑅 2 −(𝑎𝑑 −𝑏𝑐 )2 during handoff, by letting only a minimum numberLETij= 𝑎 2 +𝑐 2 of gateways communicate with the UMTS BST atwhere, an instance. It should be noted that, according to thea = vicosθi – vjcosθj ; b = xi – xj above discussed multi-metric gateway selectionc = vi sinθi – vjsinθj ; d = yi –yj algorithm, the RET value is the maximum for a source with its nearest CH. This is because if Intuitively the larger the value of the LET, there exists any sub-cluster beyond the reachablethe higher is the stability of the link. Let a route sub-clusters from the vehicular source, the RETbetween a source and the gateway consist of (n - 1) between the source and the CH of that sub-clusterlinks between n vehicles. RET of the route can be will be null as there will be no common neighborthen expressed as follows: GWC between any two sub-clusters.RETn−1 = min{LETi,i+1}, i = 1. . .n − 1 B. Multi-metric Adaptive Mobile Gateway Handover Mechanism(algorithm 2) The scaling, weighting of priority factors The pseudo-code of the gateway handoverand normalization of the metric values follow the mechanism is shown in Algorithm 2. The mainmethod described to obtain the scaled metric value concept behind the gateway handover approach is asYi and weight (WCH) of any CHi. In Algorithm 1, follows. If the UMTS RSS of the gateway goesthe UMTS RSS and RET are metrics with positive below the signal strength threshold and/or if thecriterion (i.e., more optimality with increase in RET of the gateway with the source vehicle goesvalue). As far as the mobility speed metric is below its predetermined threshold, migration fromconcerned, if the direction of movement is towards the serving gateway to one or more gateways,the BST, the criterion is positive whereas if the selected by MMGSA, should take place for thatmovement is away from the BST, the criterion is vehicle. It should be stated that the mobility speednegative (i.e., less optimality with increase in value). metric is not considered in the gateway handoverHowever, in this paper, the first vehicular source decision due to the extremely inconsistent andbroadcasts a Gateway Solicitation (GWSOL) dynamic variation in the velocity of vehicles, whichmessage within the VANET, using the TTL value as makes it difficult to use a threshold value for speed.discussed in Section V-C. Given the fact that a The serving gateway forms a list of Gateway-Electshybrid gateway discovery mechanism is employed, by selecting one or more CHs having the maximumevery GWC belonging to a cluster knows weight with respect to each of its sources. All newinformation about its CH. Hence, it is sufficient for incoming transactions are forwarded to the newthe GWSOL to reach any GWC of a cluster to get Gateway- Elects. The serving gateway GW informsinformation about its CH; instead of reaching the current active vehicular sources in VANETdirectly the CH. The metric information of each CH about the Gateway-Elects using a hybrid gatewaylies with the GWCs of the cluster. When the discovery and advertisement mechanism.GWSOL message reaches any GWC, thisinformation is notified to the source. An optimal During the gateway selection, the gatewaygateway is then selected by the source vehicle using may correspond with one of the CHs. However, at athe MMGSA mechanism. The source vehicle then different instance, the same gateway may not servenotifies the vehicles of the newly selected gateway. as a CH, due to the dynamic clustering mechanism,By the time the next set of vehicular sources stated above. It may also instantaneously lose allemerge, at least one gateway would have been its neighbors which it had while being elected. Itelected as a result of the GWSOL initiated by the subsequently forms or joins a new cluster, while stillfirst source. maintaining its role as gateway in case its optimality is not affected, and gets new neighbors during the Each metric of the CH has its own communication course. There is also no guaranteethreshold value. After a time interval _t, if another that it will be the CH of the new cluster. Prior tovehicle becomes an active source for losing its optimality, a serving gateway selectscommunicating with the UMTS BST, that source Gateway-Elects (one or more), with respect to eachchecks if the UMTS RSS of the serving gateway and of its active sources.its RET with the gateway are greater than therespective threshold values SSTh and RETTh. If yes, Additionally CMGM also performs gatewaythe active source uses the same advertisement at the time of handover, determinesgateway for communicating with the UMTS BST. cluster head and also TTL(Time-To-Live)of aOtherwise, the source selects another gateway from cluster.the remaining CHs of the other clusters, by applyingthe MMGSA approach. Thus, MMGSA selects onlya minimum number of optimal gateways, savesthe UTRAN access network resources, especially 1802 | P a g e
  • 4. K V Dinesh Kumar, B Swathi, K Suresh, M Suneetha Rani / International Journal of Engineering Research and Applications (IJERA) ISSN: 2248-9622 www.ijera.com Vol. 2, Issue 5, September- October 2012, pp.1800-1805IV. PRIORITY IN HETEROGENEOUS Table 1: NS2 simulation parameters for VANETNETWORKS Parameters Value In priority resolving, the operation is Uplink Frequency 1.95GHzcarried in three phases. They are: Downlink Frequency 2.115GHz a) Identification of vehicle, Peak UTRAN Uplink 384 Kbps b) Gateway resolving its priorities Channel Bit Rate c) Serving vehicle by broadcasting its arrival. Peak UTRAN 2 Mbps Downlink Channel In the normal environment the gateway Bit Rateserves all its nodes equally without any priority. Transmission Range 7 kmThere is an instance where a vehicle has to be given of UMTS Node Bpriority. In the process of giving priority, first Node B Interface 20 packetsvehicle is identified by the gateway. For the gateway Queue lengthto identify vehicle, vehicle is given fixed IP address UMTS Node B – 622 Mbps(Transmissionirrespective to the location and care is taken such RNC Data Rate Time Interval (TTI): 1 ms)that normal nodes will not have the same IP address. RNC – SGSN Data 622 Mbps(TTI: 1 ms )Then gateway receives the request packets from the Ratevehicle with IP address given to it. SGSN – GGSN Data 622 Mbps(TTI: 10 ms) On receiving request packets from vehicle Ratethe gateway has to check its table of IP addresses, GGSN – External IP 10 Mbps (TTI: 15 ms)which it is serving now. Then it uses priority network data rateresolving method which is static, in allocating Routing Protocol 3G Pro-active routingpriority to vehicle IP address. This kind of priority Table 2: NS2 simulation parameters for UMTSmethod is known as fixed priority method. Actually gateway acts as a Wi-Fi access V. SIMULATION RESULTSpoint. So it can serve all the nodes at a time. But the The proposed Grouping-based Poly-drawback is delay. Because gateway has to transmit functional mobile Gateway Managementthe information to all its nodes at the same time. mechanism (CMGM) is implemented in theThis causes communication delay and results in Network Simulator NS2.34. For creating a mobiletraffic jam journey for vehicle. This is solved by terminal with dual interfaces, the IEEE 802.11 andgiving priority to information coming from node in the UMTS libraries of NS-Miracle were used. Theneed of priority. Hence the information from scenario consists of a VEHICLE GROUP connectedpriority node is sent to base station for broadcasting to the 3G network via the UTRAN interface. Tablespurpose by the gateway prior to the information I and II list the simulation parameters of thecoming from remaining nodes[6]. VEHICLE GROUP and 3G network s, respectively. The performance of the integrated network is Parameters Value evaluated in terms of Data Packet Delivery Area 8000 x 1000(m2) Function, Control Packet Overhead, throughput. The Channel Channel/ Wireless channel simulated results are given below: Propagation Model Propagation/nakagami Network Interface Phy/WirelessPhyExt MAC Interface Mac/802_11Ext Peak Wireless 300m Transmission Range Interface Queue Type Queue/DropTail/PriQueue Interface Queue 20 packets length Antenna Type Antenna/OmniAntenna Routing Protocol AODV Total number of 11 VANET vehicles Peak Mobility speed 30ms-1 Mobility Model Manhattan Mobility Model Graph 1: data packet delivery UMTS RSS -94dBM ratio versus number of nodes Threshold Transport-Layer TCP/Newreno The graph 1, demonstrates the good protocol performance of the proposed CMGM in terms of Application FTP higher DPDR, compared to the other two protocols, Packet size 1 KB and that is for different numbers of vehicular 1803 | P a g e
  • 5. K V Dinesh Kumar, B Swathi, K Suresh, M Suneetha Rani / International Journal of Engineering Research and Applications (IJERA) ISSN: 2248-9622 www.ijera.com Vol. 2, Issue 5, September- October 2012, pp.1800-1805sources in the VANET. The graph indicates that required optimal number), the selected gatewaysregardless of the underlying protocol, DPDR will be overloaded with data packets; some of whichgenerally tends to decrease along with increase in will be discarded, ultimately impacting thethe number of sources. The curves show a negative throughput. Hence, the first set of readings in thetrend. Indeed, the number of sources increases, the figure does not show a big difference in thepacket drops subsequently increase, especially when throughput achieved by the three protocols.the gateway is on the verge of losing its optimality. The simulation is carried out by giving priority to vehicle and the graph is plotted for the data packet delivery ratio versus the number of nodes, for priority node and a node without priority then the graph resulted as follows:Graph 2: overhead versus number of nodes The above graph 2 shows increase in CPOagainst the number of sources generating data.Though this is generally the trend, CMGM overAODV shows less CPO compared to the otherprotocols. This is due to the fact that only minimumnumbers of adequate gateways are elected forcarrying on the transaction, which significantlyreduces CPO due to multiple gateways, as in thecase of MGSA. However, a small amount of Graph 4: data packet delivery ratio versus number ofoverhead is involved during handover. One of the nodes for priority and priority-less vehicles.main differences between MGSA and our proposedCMGM mechanisms consists in the fact thatmobility is considered as a highly important metric VI. CONCLUSIONin CMGM whilst it is overlooked in MGSA. In this paper, we describe a network architecture that integrates VANET with UMTS and WIMAX. To enable such an integrated architecture, vehicles are clustered according to different metrics. A minimum number of adequate vehicles are selected to connect VANET and UMTS. Gateway management and selection is also performed in a dynamic manner using different metrics and in any emergency situation emergency nodes must be given priority such that they can be driven obstacle- free by broadcasting the messages within inter- VANET and intra-VANET. Hence this application can help vehicle to reach the place in-time. The result of data packet delivery ratio for priority and priority-less vehicles is presented in the paper. So inGraph 3: throughput versus number of clusters future work, we will present the simulation results for overhead and throughput also. In this graph, the achieved averageindividual throughput by using three different VII. REFERENCESprotocols is plotted for different numbers of clusters. [1] RAMC: A RSU-Assisted Multi-Channel In case there are many VANET clusters, Coordination MAC Protocol for VANET--CMGM would be able to select optimal CHs Kai LiuSch. of Electron. & Inf., Tongjias gateways and to support service continuity. Univ., Shanghai, China (2009)However, in case there are few clusters with not [2] Partho P.Mishra, Hemant Kanakia, “Aenough available gateways (i.e., less than the Hop-by-hop Ratebased Congestion Control 1804 | P a g e
  • 6. K V Dinesh Kumar, B Swathi, K Suresh, M Suneetha Rani / International Journal of Engineering Research and Applications (IJERA) ISSN: 2248-9622 www.ijera.com Vol. 2, Issue 5, September- October 2012, pp.1800-1805 Scheme,” In Proc. ACM SIGCOMM’92: 112-123.[3] B. Hull, K. Jamieson, and H. Balakrishnan, “Mitigating Congestion in Wireless Sensor Networks,” in Proc. ACM Sensys, Nov. 2004.[4] Sankarasubramaniam, Y., Ozgur, A., Akyildiz, I.: ESRT Event-to-Sink Reliable Transport in Wireless Sensor Networks. In: the Proceedings of ACM Mobihoc, pp. 177–189. ACM Press, New York (2003)[5] C.T. Ee and R. Bajcsy, “Congestion Control and Fairness for Many-to-one Routing in Sensor Networks,” in Proc.ACM Sensys, Nov. 2004.[6] Priority-based Congestion Control in Wireless Sensor Networks Chonggang Wang1, Kazem Sohraby1, Victor Lawrence2, Bo Li3, Yueming Hu4Proceedings of the IEEE[7] V. Rajendran, K. Obraczka, and J.J. Garcia-Luna-Aceves, “Energy-Efficient Collision-Free Medium Access Control for Wireless Sensor Networks”, 1st International Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems (SenSys’03), pp.181-192, Nov.2003.[8] I. Rhee, A. Warrier, M. Aia, and J. Min, “Z-MAC: A Hybrid MAC for Wireless Sensor Networks”, 3rd International Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems (SenSys’05), pp.90-101, Nov.2005.[9] M. Barnes, H. Leather and D.K. Arvind, “Emergency Evacuation using Wireless Sensor Networks”, 32nd IEEE Conference on Local Computer Networks (LCN’07), pp 851-857, Oct. 2007.[10] Yihong Wu, Lin Zhang, Yiqun Wu, Zhisheng Niu, “Interest Dissemination with Directional Antennas for Wireless Sensor Networks with Mobile Sinks,” 4th International Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems (Sensys’06), pp.99-111, 2006. 1805 | P a g e

×