Your SlideShare is downloading. ×
Bw24494498
Bw24494498
Bw24494498
Bw24494498
Bw24494498
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×

Thanks for flagging this SlideShare!

Oops! An error has occurred.

×
Saving this for later? Get the SlideShare app to save on your phone or tablet. Read anywhere, anytime – even offline.
Text the download link to your phone
Standard text messaging rates apply

Bw24494498

103

Published on

0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total Views
103
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
0
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
2
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

Report content
Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
No notes for slide

Transcript

  • 1. Rajshree B. Jotania, Pratiksha A. Patel / International Journal of Engineering Research and Applications (IJERA) ISSN: 2248-9622 www.ijera.com Vol. 2, Issue 4, July-August 2012, pp.494-498 Microstructure and Dielectric Properties of Mn Substituted Sr2Cu2Fe12O22 (Cu2Y) Hexaferrite Powder Rajshree B. Jotania*, Pratiksha A. Patel** *(Department of Physics, University School of sciences, Gujarat University, Navrangpura, Ahmedabad 380 009, Gujarat, India) ** (Samarth College of Engineering & Technology, Himmatnagar 383 001, Gujarat, India)ABSTRACT Hexaferrites are relatively low cost, composition Fe6O8 which is also known as spinelchemically stable material and they have found block.wide range of technological applications in The Y-structure can be built up from spinel blocks oftransformer core, high-quality filters, electronic, two oxygen layers which are connected by a block T,microwave devices and components. Among all one above the other, two layers with barium ions. Thehexaferrites, Y-type hexaferrite is an important layers containing barium (or strontium or lead) aretype of magnetic materials in VHF and UHF and hexagonal packed with respect to their adjacenthas gained much interest in recent years due to oxygen layer. These barium ions are larger than thetheir multiferroic properties. In this paper we oxygen ions. Therefore the distance between thereport the microstructural and dielectric oxygen layers which contain no barium ion. Theproperties of the polycrystalline bulk samples of distances are 2.40 and 2.32Å respectively. TheSr2Cu2-xMnxFe12O22 (x = 0.0, 0.6, 0.8, 1.0) projection of the distance between the centers of thehexaferrite prepared by using a chemical co- Ba ions on to the axis is 2.90Å, from which itprecipitation synthesis. All hexaferrite samples follows that the centers of the barium ions lies at awere characterized using XRD, FTIR, SEM and distance of 0.25Å out of the plane of the nearestdielectric measurements. X-ray results confirm oxygen layer [1, 2]. The unit cell with hexagonalthat Mn substitution for Cu does not affect the symmetry (space group R m) consists of 18 oxygenY-type hexaferrite phase formation. Dielectric layers with a repeat distance extending through onlymeasurements were carried out at room six oxygen layers.the length of the c axis beingtemperature in frequency range of 102 Hz to 43.56Å. In the hexagonal element cell each layer2x106Hz. again contain four large ions. There are fourKeywords - Y-type hexaferrite, co-precipitation successive layers of four oxygen ions, followed bytechnique, XRD, SEM, Dielectric properties two layers each containing three oxygen ions and one barium ion. The unit cell is composed of theI. INTRODUCTION sequence STSTST including three formula units. The Hexagonal ferrites are classified on the basis of metallic cations are distributed among six sublatticestheir chemical composition and crystal structure. as shown in table 1. Three octahedral ions ofThey are subdivided into six types: M-type sublattices 6cVI and 3bVI lies on a vertical threefold(AFe12O19), W-type (AMe2Fe16O27), X-type axis while the central 3bVI, ion sharing two faces of(A2Me2Fe28O46), Y-type (A2Me2Fe12O22), Z-type its coordination with the adjacent 6cVI ions inside T(A3Me2Fe24O41) and U-type (A4Me2Fe36O60); where block. Such a configuration possesses a higherA represents ions like Ba, Sr or Pb, and Me potential energy of the structure due to a strongerrepresents divalent metal ions like Mg or Zn. The electrostatic repulsion between the cations; thereforecrystalline and magnetic structures of the different such sites are likely to be preferred by low chargetypes of hexaferrites are remarkably complex and can ions. The Y-type hexagonal hexaferrites have gainedbe considered as a superposition of T, R and S blocks much interest in recent years due to their multiferroicalong the hexagonal c-axis. Where T block of four properties [3-5]. These ferrites are used in electronictypes of oxygen ions (O4-BaO3-BaO3-O4) with the communication, microwave devices andcomposition Ba2Fe8O14, R is a three oxygen layer components6. Miniaturization of ferrite devices in theblock (O4-BaO3-O4) with the composition BaFe6O11, electronic communication requires high-permeabilityS block is a two oxygen layer block (O4-O4) with materials at relatively lower microwave frequencies (0–10 GHz) and Y-type hexaferrite considered as 494 | P a g e
  • 2. Rajshree B. Jotania, Pratiksha A. Patel / International Journal of Engineering Research and Applications (IJERA) ISSN: 2248-9622 www.ijera.com Vol. 2, Issue 4, July-August 2012, pp.494-498 potential material for technical applications. High and was kept at room temperature 24 hours for aging. permeability in Y-type ferrite is attributed to spin The obtained precipitates were washed in 1:1 mixture rotation and domain wall motions. Y-type hexaferrite of methanol and acetone followed by 100% de is an important type of soft magnetic materials in ionized water to remove impurities. The precipitate VHF and UHF [7-14]. was dried at 80°C for 24 hours in an oven and then calcined at 950°C for 4 hours followed by furnace Table 1. Number of ions per unit formula, cooling to room temperature to get final product of coordination and spin orientation for the various Sr2Cu2-XMnXFe12O22 hexaferrite powder. metallic sublattices of Y-structure [15]. 2.2 CharacterizationSublattice Coordination Block Number The Fourier transformed infrared spectra of ions Spin (FTIR) of dried precursors and calcinated powder were recorded at room temperature by the KBr pellet 6cIV tetrahedral S 2 Down method using a FTIR Brucker tensor 27 model. Phase and quantitative analysis were performed by X-ray 3aVI octahedral S 1 UP diffraction using CuKα radiation (λ = 1.5405Å) on PW1830 diffractometer. The 2θ Bragg angles were 8hVI octahedral S-T 6 UP scanned over a range of 18-90°. Scanning electron micrographs were obtained using a MAKE- 6cVI octahedral T 2 Down LEO/LICA Model STEROECAN 440 scanning 6cIV tetrahedral T 2 Down electron microscope. The dielectric properties of Sr2Cu2-XMnXFe12O22 (x= 0.0, 0.6, 0.8 and 1.0) 3bVI octahedral T 1 UP samples were investigated using an Agilent Precision LCR meter (Model No. E4980A). The physical properties of Y-type hexaferrite depends on many factors like preparation methods, III RESULTS AND DISCUSSION sintering temperature, time, chemical composition and amount of substitution etc. Many studies have 3.1 FTIR analysis been reported on addition of divalent, trivalent and tetravalent ions in Y-hexaferrites [16-21], but FTIR spectra of dried precursors and according to our knowledge none has reported Mn calcinated samples was taken for x = 0.8 and 1.0 substituted Y-type strontium-copper hexaferrite. Our samples in order to monitor the structural changes work focuses on the Physical and dielectric studies of during the synthesis process. Mn doped Y-type hexaferrite prepared. For this purpose Y-type hexaferrite with composition Sr2Cu2-XMnXFe12O22 (x = 0.0, 0.6, 0.8 and 1.0) has been prepared using a co-precipitation technique. II. EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURE 2.1 Powder preparation Single-phase hexaferrite powders of Mn doped Cu2Y with composition Sr2Cu2-xMnxFe12O22 (x = 0.0, 0.6, 0.8, 1.0) were produced by using a co- precipitation technique. A. R. Grade powder of strontium nitrate (Sr(NO3)2·6H2O), ferric nitrate (Fe(NO3)2·9H2O), copper sulfate (CuSO4), Manganese nitrate (Mn(NO3)2·4H2O) were used as starting materials. Stoicheometric amount of strontium nitrate, ferric nitrate, copper sulfate and manganese nitrate were mixed in an appropriate amount of de-ionized water. Ammonium solution Fig. 1(a) FTIR Spectra of Sr2Cu2-xMnxFe12O22 (30% w/v) was added slowly in the mixture to adjust (x=0.8) hexaferrite sample pH of 8. The mixed solution was stirred for two hours 495 | P a g e
  • 3. Rajshree B. Jotania, Pratiksha A. Patel / International Journal of Engineering Research and Applications (IJERA) ISSN: 2248-9622 www.ijera.com Vol. 2, Issue 4, July-August 2012, pp.494-498 Where h, k, l are miller indices and d is inter planer distance. type The unit cell volume V of hexagonal crystal is obtained from equation (2) Unit cell volume, (2) The value of lattice constants and cell volume of prepared hexaferrite samples are listed in table 1. From the XRD results, it is evident that mono phase of Strontium Magenise hexaferrite produces at temperature of 950ºC.Fig. 1(b) FTIR Spectra of Sr2Cu2-xMnxFe12O2 [3017] [116] [0013] (x=1.0) hexaferrite sample [1128] Figure 1 shows the FTIR spectra of as [3019] [305] [215]prepared precipitates and the calcinated samples in [0210] [0029] [110]the wave number range from 4000 cm-1 to 400 cm-1. [0018] [2132]Figure 1 (a, b) shows FTIR spectra of dried [1130] Intensity (arb. unit) [1121] [119] [3025]precursors (heated at 40°C for 24 hrs) and Sr2Cu2- X= 0.0 [024]XMnXFe12O22 (x = 0.8 and 1.0) hexaferrite particlescalcinated at 950°C, respectively. The spectra ofdried precursors indicates the characteristic bands in X= 0.6the range 3200-3600 cm-1 assigned to O-H stretchingvibration of water molecules, while the asymmetrical X= 0.8and symmetrical vibration bands of CO2- are locatedaround 1600 cm-1. The bands about 1380 cm -1 areascribed to the N-O stretching vibration of NO3-. X= 1.0FTIR results show that after calcination theabsorption bands related to O-H, CO2-, and N-O aredisappear. The bands appearing around 550 cm-1 and440 cm-1 are attributed to M-O stretching vibration 20 30 40 50 2 Theta (deg.) 60 70 80of hexaferrite [22-24].3.2 X-ray analysis Fig. 2(a) XRD diffractogram of Sr2Cu2-XMnXFe12O22 (x =0.0, 0.6, 0.8, 1.0) hexaferrite powder Figure 2 (a, b) shows experimental X-raydiffraction patterns for Sr2Cu2-XMnXFe12O22 (x= 0.0,0.6, 0.8 and 1.0) samples and a standard pattern forY-type hexaferrite respectively. All XRD reflectionpeaks are indexed by applying a hexagonal crystalsystem and space group P63/mmc (here planes[0012], [113], [110], [1013], [116], [119], [024],[0210] [300], [2113], [1025], [220], [3015] used forprepared samples). Lattice constants a and c of Mndoped strontium copper hexaferrite samples werecalculated using equation (1) = (1) Fig. 2(b) Standard XRD pattern of Y- type 496 | P a g e
  • 4. Rajshree B. Jotania, Pratiksha A. Patel / International Journal of Engineering Research and Applications (IJERA) ISSN: 2248-9622 www.ijera.com Vol. 2, Issue 4, July-August 2012, pp.494-498Table 2. Lattice parameters (a, c) and cell volume Figure. 3 shows SEM micrographs of(V) of Sr2Cu2-XMnXFe12O22 (x = 0.0, 0.6, 0.8 and 1.0) Sr2Cu2-xMnxFe12O22 (x = 0.0, 0.6, 0.8 and 1.0)samples hexaferrite samples sintered at 950°C for 4 hrs, prepared by a chemical coprecipitation method. It is Sr. Mn Lattice constants observed from SEM images that the grains are non- uniform and densely distributed over the surface, No. Content (x) a (Å) c (Å) Volume more over grain size of the compound is found to be in the range of 300 nm–1.5μm. The SEM V (Å3) micrographs show that the grain size of the samples increased distinctly with Mn increases and the 1 0.0 5.695 59.00 1654.23 porosity decreased. 2 0.6 5.695 59.02 1657.13 3.4 Dielectric properties 3 0.8 5.695 59.02 1657.13 The dielectric measurements were carried out over the frequency range of 100 Hz to 2 MHz at room 4 1.0 5.695 59.00 1657.13 temperature. The variation of dielectric constant The XRD analysis reveals that all samples produce (real part, ε‫ )׳‬and dielectric loss (tan δ) withsingle Y-type phase and there is no effect of Mn frequency for Sr2Cu2-XMnXFe12O22 (x= 0.8, 1.0)substitution on phase formation. The results indicate hexaferrite samples are shown in figure (4a) andthat the material has a well defined Y-type ferrite figure 4(b) respectively. It is clear from figurecrystalline phase. Lattice parameters of all four 4(a, b); the dielectric constant (ε‫ )׳‬as well assamples are found almost equal (a = 5.690Å, c = dielectric loss tangent (tan δ) decreases with59.00Å). There is not much effect of Mn substitution increasing measuring frequency. This decreaseon lattice parameters and cell volume because of behavior of (ε‫ )׳‬and (tan δ) with log frequency canalmost same ionic radii of Cu2+ (0.57Å) and Mn2+ be explained on the basis of the assumption that the(0.66Å). mechanism of the polarization process in ferrites [22, 23].3.3. SEM analysis 18 X=0.8 X=1.0 15 Dielectric constant (real) 12 9 6 2 3 4 5 6 7 Log F Fig. 4 (a) Frequency dependence of dielectric constant (real part, ε) of Sr2Cu2-XMnXFe12O22 (x = 0.8, 1.0) hexaferrite samples The dielectric loss (tan δ) can be expressed in terms of the real and imaginary parts of the dielectric constant asFig. 3 SEM micrographs of Sr2Cu2-xMnxFe12O22 (3) 497 | P a g e
  • 5. Rajshree B. Jotania, Pratiksha A. Patel / International Journal of Engineering Research and Applications (IJERA) ISSN: 2248-9622 www.ijera.com Vol. 2, Issue 4, July-August 2012, pp.494-498Where and are the real and imaginary parts of [6] Y. Bai, J. Zhou, Z. Gui, L. Li, Mater Chem Physthe dielectric constant respectively 98(1), 2006, 66-70. [7] M. Obol , X. Zuo, C. Vittoria, J Appl Phys 91, 2006, 7616-19. doi:10.1063/1.1446113 0.30 [8] T.Nakamura, K. I. Hatakeyama, IEEE Trans Magn 36,2000, 3415-3417. doi:10.1109/20.908844 X=0.8 [9] H. J. Kwon, J. Y. Shin, J. Y. Oh, J Appl Phys 0.25 X=1.0 75,1994,6109-6111. doi:10.1063/1.355476 [10] M. Obol , C. Vittoria, J Appl Phys 94,2003, 4013- 0.20 4017. doi:10.1063/1.1601291 Loss tangent [11] M. Obol, C. Vittoria, IEEE Trans Magn 39, 2003, 0.15 3103-3105.doi:10.1109/TMAG.2003.816019 [12] M. Obol, C. Vittoria, J Magn Magn Mater, 0.10 E1799, 2004,272–276. doi:10.1016/j.jmmm.2003.12.1116 0.05 [13] M. Obol, C. Vittoria, J Magn Magn Mater 265,2003, 290-295. doi:10.1016/S0304- 0.00 8853(03)00277-4. 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 4.5 5.0 5.5 6.0 6.5 [14] Y. Bai, J. Zhou, Z.Gui, L. Li, J Magn Magn Log F Mater 250, 2002, 364- 369. [15] G. Albanese, Journal de Physique, Colloque CI, supplement au no. 4, Tome 38,1977,Cl-85-C194. Fig. 4 (b) The variation of dielectric loss tangent [16] G. Albanese, A. Deriu, F. Licci and S. Rinaldi,with log frequency IEEE Trans Magn Mag 14, 1978,710–712. [17] A Deriu, F Licci, S Rinaldi and T Besagni, J Magn IV. CONCLUSION Magn Mater, 22,1981, 257-260. Mn doped Cu2Y hexaferrite powder [18] S. G. Lee and S. J. Kwon, J Magn Magn Mater,(Sr2Cu2-XMnXFe12O22) have been synthesized using 153,1996, 279 -284.a chemical co-precipitation synthesis technique [19] M. A. El. Hiti, and A. M. Abo El Ata, J Magn Magn Mater 195,1999, 667-678.followed by a single-step sintering at 950°C for 4 [20] Y. Hiraoka, H. Nakamura, M. Soda, Y.hrs. Prepared hexaferrite materials were Wakabayashi, and T. Kimura, J Appl Phys, 110,characterized for structure, morphology, and 2011, 0339201-7.dielectric properties. FTIR results confirm the [21] K. Knížek, P. Novák and M. Küpferling, Phys Revformation of pure hexaferrite and structural changes B 73,2006,1531031-4.produced after calcination at high temperatures. [22] O. Crap, R. Barjeda, E. Segal, M. Brezeanu,XRD result reveals that Mn doping (x = 0.0, 0.6, 0.8 Thermochim Acta, 318,1998, 57.and 1.0) does not destroy the phase formation of Y- [23] H. G. Zhang, L. T. Li, Z. W. Ma, J. Zhou, Z. X.type hexaferrite. Mn doping increased the grain size Yue, Z. L. Gui, J Magn Magn Mater 218, 2000, 67-71.and decreased porosity. [24] Z. Yue, W. Guo, J. Zhou, Z. Gui, L. Li, J Magn Magn Mater, 270, 2004, 216-223.ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS [25] K. W. Wagner, Amer Phis, 40,1973, 817-855. The authors are thankful to GUJCOST, [26] C. G. Koops, Phys Rev, 83,1951,121-124.Gandhinagar, Gujarat, India for providing partialfinancial support in the form of minor researchproject code no.0401121.REFERENCES[1] M. Y. Salunkhe, D. K. Kulkarni, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 279(1), 2004, 64-68. doi.org/10.1016/j.jmmm.2004.01.046[2] J. Smit, H. P. J. Wijn, In: Ferrites, (Philip’s Tech Library, New York, 1959)[3] S. Ishiwata, Y. Taguchi, H. Murakawa, Y. Onose, Y. Tokura, Science 319,2008,1643-1346.[4] T. Kimura, G. Lawes and A. P. Ramirez, Phys Rev Lett 94, 2005,137201-4.[5] S. Ishiwata, Y. Taguchi, Y. Tokunaga, H. Murakawa, Y. Onose and Y. Tokura, Phy Rev B 79, 2009, 180408 (R). 498 | P a g e

×