Social Sourcing as a Collaborative Design Process: Story of GetPaid (Plone Conference 2007)

Loading...

Flash Player 9 (or above) is needed to view presentations.
We have detected that you do not have it on your computer. To install it, go here.

0 comments

Post a comment

    Post a comment
    Embed Video
    Edit your comment Cancel

    1 Favorite

    Social Sourcing as a Collaborative Design Process: Story of GetPaid (Plone Conference 2007) - Presentation Transcript

    1. Social Sourcing Free Software: The story of GetPaid and creating new opportunities for Plone Christopher Johnson ifPeople | www.ifpeople.net Plone Conference 2007 Napoli, Italy October 9, 2007
    2. Outline ● What is Social Sourcing? ● Why is it important for Free Software? ● The Story of GetPaid & Social Sourcing ● Lessons for Plone
    3. What is Social Sourcing? Def 1: Open Source Software for Civil Society Organizations (ie NGO/non- profit)
    4. What is Social Sourcing? Def. 2: An organizing approach that gets diverse stakeholders to participate to the software making process.
    5. Similar Process: Charrette ● Charrettes bring together people from multiple perspectives at the design stage for an intense collaboration. – Root: French for “cart” – More than just “crunch time”, it is also core to an Integrated Design Process
    6. Charrette ● Frequently used for: innovative building design, community planning, product design. – Key: collaborative decision making in design
    7. Data Center Charrette ● People from hardware, software, security, energy, real estate and more – Resulting design: ● 89% energy use reduction ● Equivalent computing power ● Increased reliability – See rmi.org
    8. Why is this relevant? ● Open Source Software projects are driven by developers ==> Developers, like architects, often reticent to get “human” input ==> Difficult for non-developers to participate in shaping outcome
    9. Why is this relevant? ● Diverse perspectives enrich the product ==> Expectations from client clarified upfront ==> Opportunities and constraints explored fully
    10. Why is this relevant? ● The quality of the process determines the quality of the outcome ==> How you get it done determines what you get done ==> Position product to have a strong community
    11. ● Plone: – Flexible + very useful out of the box ● Internationally... – Wide use in NGOs, though still dependent on third-party systems for donations ● 2006 PloneConf BOF – Conclusion: Need state of the art payment processing framework
    12. ● To action! But... – /me was new to community, not a developer, and with no ecommerce software experience. – “Social sourcing” helped to be transparent, inclusive, and improve the product. ● <DOCTYPE FREESOFTWARE PUBLIC...> <div id=”entrepreneur”> ...don't be afraid!
    13. ● Step 1: Get oriented – What is already out there? – What do we know about those things? – Why do we need something else? ● Result: – Reference on Plone Commerce: http://plonegetpaid.com/why/plone-commerce-backgro – Need for the product: http://plonegetpaid.com/why/need-for-this-product
    14. ● Step 2: Make a plan – What should we do? – How can we do it? – Who does it benefit and how? – Make it pretty to look at... ● Results: – Goal for GetPaid M1: Donation handling – Sponsorship plan: www.plonegetpaid.com/sponsor
    15. ● Step 3: Recruit leaders and participants – The project needs a qualified “sheperd” – Variety of expertise are needed ● Result: – Lead architect: Kapil Thangavelu – Organizer: Christopher Johnson – NGO Liason: Jon Stahl – Developers and UI: various (see Credits)
    16. ● Step 4: Refine the requirements (participative) – Get input of users, developers, user interface experts, consultants/supporters ● Results: – Architecture outline – User stories
    17. ● Step 5: Ask for money! – If you don't ask, you won't get it... – Tips for asking: ● Connect needs with value ● Be transparent ● Be patient and persistent ● Result: – Raised over US$12,000 to date – Contributions page
    18. ● Step 5: Don't forget... – Be accountable and transparent
    19. ● Step 6: Celebrate successes! – Reward and recognize people and their contributions – Communication is important! ● Results: – Blog, mailing list – Celebrations...
    20. ● Ongoing: – Make it fun! – Keep it organized! – Keep people motivated! ● Results: – 3 Sprints (UNC, Google, Argentina) – Google Code (wiki, issues) – Blog, mailing lists, channel (#getpaid)
    21. Social Source v1.0 Alpha ● – Study the market (benchmark) – Put together a compelling plan – Recruit the right people – Engage a wide base in refining requirements – Ask for money – Celebrate successes – Sustain it: fun, organization, motivation – Regroup, review, and restart...
    22. What does this mean for Plone? ● Plone is great! ● Lots of work heading into the future...but towards what? – Perhaps Plone could benefit from process improvements that would: ● Clarify direction and identity ● Provide more inclusive design process ● Improve the overall product ● Strengthen Plone community
    23. Plone Creation Process ● Overall vision: – Open process associated with vision? ● How can users be more involved? – Place to document it? ● Features: – PLIPs process determines features...but you have to be a “core developer” to make a PLIP ● Something before PLIPs but more specific than vision? ● Way to involve non-developers?
    24. Reminder ● Check out GetPaid at Naples Sprint! – Sprint for the Red Ocher Release Candidate – October 13-15, 2007
    25. Thank you! ● Contact info: – Christopher Johnson – cjj (at) ifpeople.net – www.ifpeople.net ● Links: – www.plonegetpaid.com – plone.org

    + ifPeopleifPeople, 2 years ago

    custom

    691 views, 1 favs, 0 embeds more stats

    Open Source projects are normally developer-driven more

    More info about this document

    © All Rights Reserved

    Go to text version

    • Total Views 691
      • 691 on SlideShare
      • 0 from embeds
    • Comments 0
    • Favorites 1
    • Downloads 1
    Most viewed embeds

    more

    All embeds

    less

    Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
    Flag as inappropriate

    Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate. If needed, use the feedback form to let us know more details.

    Cancel
    File a copyright complaint
    Having problems? Go to our helpdesk?

    Categories