Applying agile and lean principles to the governance of software and systems development


Published on

Applying lean thinking to the governance
of software development

Published in: Technology
  • Be the first to comment

No Downloads
Total Views
On Slideshare
From Embeds
Number of Embeds
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

Applying agile and lean principles to the governance of software and systems development

  1. 1. IBM Software Agility@Scale™RationalApplying agile and lean principlesto the governance of software andsystems development
  2. 2. 2 Agility@ScaleApplying lean thinking to the governance It’s possible to loosen the reins onof software development development teams without losing control.As more and more project teams adopt agile softwaredevelopment methods, issues arise with traditional approaches The good news is that you’re likely following some of theseto IT governance. Such approaches—which include Control practices already. The bad news is that it’ll likely take yourObjectives for Information and Related Technology (COBIT) organization several years to adopt every practice, and there’sand the Project Management Institute (PMI) Organizational no set order in which to implement them. However, theProject Management Maturity Model (OPM-3)—are often too practices are synergistic and can be adopted incrementally.heavy in practice for development shops seeking to be more Each added practice helps strengthen your ability to effectivelyagile or lean. implement subsequent practices.Effective governance for lean development isn’t about Defining governancecommand and control. Instead, the focus is on enabling the IT and systems engineering governance establishes chains ofright behaviors and practices through collaborative and responsibility, authority and communication in support of thesupportive techniques. It is far more effective to motivate overall enterprise’s goals and strategy. It also establishespeople to do the right thing than it is to force them to do so. measurements, policies, standards and control mechanisms to enable people to carry out their roles and responsibilitiesA lean approach to development governance weaves the effectively.1 You do this by balancing risk versus return onphilosophies of lean and agile software development into investment (ROI), setting in place effective processes andtraditional IT governance to form a lightweight, collaboration- practices, defining the direction and goals for the department,based framework that reflects the realities of modern IT and defining the roles that people play with and within theorganizations. department.This paper begins with an overview of the principles of Governance and management are two different things:effective IT governance, discussing how they pertain to the Governance looks at an organization from the outside, treatingmore specific subset of development governance. It follows it as a system that needs to have the appropriate structure andwith an overview of the principles of lean software processes in place to provide a stream of value. Management,development. The heart of the paper is a description of on the other hand, is inside the organization and ensures thateighteen practices that define a lean approach to governing the structure and processes are implemented development projects within your IT organization.These practices show how to embed governance into tools, Development governance is an important subset of IT andprocesses and development guidance to make it as easy as system engineering governance, the scope of which covers thepossible for people to keep their software and systems delivery steering of software and system development projects. Basedprojects on track. They bring the lean thinking that has on considerable experience with agile development teams, IBMrevolutionized supply chain management into the governance believes organizations that have adopted COBIT or OPM-3of software and systems development. (or similar traditional frameworks) can benefit by loosening the reins on their approach to governing development projects— without sacrificing essential controls and audit trails. To help you improve your governance framework, IBM has developed a palette of practices that support lean development.
  3. 3. IBM Software 3Although many of these practices also apply to IT and systems organization performing in such a way that business goals areengineering governance in general, the focus of this paper is on met. In many ways the maxims “You ship the organization” andgoverning agile and lean development projects. “You get what you measure” are primary motivators for organizations to build an effective development governancePrinciples of effective IT governance program.In The IBM Rational Edge2, Murray Cantor and John D.Sanders describe seven principles to guide IT governance Deploymentefforts. Because development governance is a subset of IT The governance solution must be implemented incrementally.governance, these principles are directly applicable to a You cannot implement all of the practices described in thisdiscussion of lean development governance. They address paper at once. You must first pick and choose the ones thatprocess, artifact lifecycle, risk, suitability, behavior, deployment address your immediate pains before adopting others.and automation. AutomationProcess Technology makes the governance solution empowering andGovernance is a process that is applied to the processes that unobtrusive. The more you embed, or automate, yourneed to be governed. Policies and standards are applied to development governance practices through automation anddevelopment processes; decision rights are enforced within the culture, the more likely they are to be followed.processes; and the processes are measured and controlled. Principles of lean software developmentArtifact lifecycle In Implementing Lean Software Development 3, Mary andThe lifecycles of artifacts produced by the governed processes Tom Poppendieck show how the seven principles of leanguide the governance solution. Part of governing software manufacturing can be applied to optimize the whole IT valuedevelopment is understanding the artifacts (such as executable stream. These principles offer practical, measurable ways totests and working software) produced by project teams, and transform software delivery processes.then monitoring how these artifacts evolve throughout thedevelop¬ment effort. Eliminate waste Lean thinking advocates regard any activity that does notRisk directly add value to the finished product as waste. The threeMeasures and controls must be adjusted according to the level biggest sources of waste in software development are theof risk. When risk is low you can focus on measuring the addition of extra features, churn and crossing organizationalactivities of the team. When risk is high you need to focus on boundaries. Crossing organizational boundaries can increasehelping the team mitigate the risk(s) it faces. costs by 25 percent or more by creating buffers that slow response time and interfere with communication. It is criticalSuitability that development teams be allowed to organize and operate inThe needs of the organization determine how the level and a manner that reflects the work they’re trying to accomplish—style of governance are tailored. For example, development rather than the functional roles of team members.teams building life critical software need a tighter governanceapproach than teams building an informational Web site. Build in quality The Poppendiecks make a simple observation: if you routinelyBehavior find problems with your verification process, then your processThe governance solution drives the organizational behavior. must be defective. When you regularly find that yourFrom a development governance point of view, the challenge is developers are doing things that you don’t want them toto create an environment that results in the development
  4. 4. 4 Agility@Scaledo—or are not doing what they should be doing—then your Optimize the wholeapproach to governance must be at fault. It’s important not to If you want to govern your development efforts effectively, youmake governance yet another set of activities layered on top of must look at the bigger picture. You need to understand theyour software process. Instead the strategy should be to embed high-level business processes that individual projects support—governance into your processes, making it as easy as possible processes that often cross multiple systems. You need tofor developers to do the right thing. manage programs of interrelated systems so you can deliver a complete product to your stakeholders. Measurements shouldCreate knowledge address how well you’re delivering business value, because thatPlanning is useful, but learning is essential. You want to is the raison d’être of your IT department.promote strategies, such as iterative development, that helpteams discover what stakeholders really want and act on that Categories of development governanceknowledge. It’s also important to have a body of reusable Traditional governance often uses command-and-controlstandards and guidelines that people can easily modify to meet strategies. These strategies focus on managing and directingspecific project needs. In addition, consistent and timely development project teams explicitly, using gateways andfeedback is important, both within the team and at the triggers that attempt to enforce rules and catch violations.program level, through continuous monitoring of simple and Although valid and effective in some situations, this approachrelevant metrics. can be like herding cats for many organizations. Much work is put into establishing the governance framework and managingDefer commitment the governance effort, but very little is achieved in practice.It’s not necessary to start software development by defining acomplete specification. You can support the business effectively In contrast, lean governance focuses on collaborative strategiesthrough flexible architectures that are change tolerant and by that strive to enable and motivate team members implicitly.scheduling irreversible decisions to the last possible moment. For example, the traditional approach to coding guidelinesFrequently, deferring commitment requires the ability to would be to create them and then enforce their usage throughclosely couple end-to-end business scenarios to capabilities formal inspections and post hoc correction of errant code. Thedeveloped in multiple applications by multiple projects. lean approach would be to write the guidelines collaboratively with your programmers, explain why it’s important forDeliver quickly everyone to adopt the guidelines, and then provide tooling andIt is possible to deliver high-quality systems quickly. By support to make it as easy as possible for developers tolimiting the work of a team to its capacity, you can establish a continuously code within those guidelines.reliable and repeatable flow of work. An effective governancestrategy doesn’t demand teams do more than they are capable Figure 1 categorizes and illustrates the relationships of theof, but instead asks them to self-organize and determine what practices for lean governance. It shows how they align to thethey can accomplish. At an organizational level, it’s important six major categories of IT governance: mission and principles,to enable programs to deliver business value at a pace defined organization, processes, measures, roles and responsibilities,by the fastest-moving projects, rather than at the speed of the and policies and standards.slowest project.Respect peopleThe Poppendiecks also observe that sustainable advantage isgained from engaged, thinking people. The implication is thatyou need a human resources strategy that focuses on enablingIT teams—not on controlling them.
  5. 5. IBM Software 5Figure 1: The eighteen practices of lean software development governance are aligned to six categories of governance.Practices for mission and principles Under the guidance of a pragmatic governance body, IT teamsIBM identifies four lean practices to guide the mission and 4 will be much more likely to conform to the governanceprinciples category of governance. program because it’s easy for them to do so. People will actually step up and make processes and polices come alive toPragmatic governance body help the organization reach its goals. The alternative is anA governance program does not run itself; a group of people environment where teams will do whatever is necessary tocalled a governance body runs it. The manner in which the comply with the command-and-control governance structure.governance body organizes and conducts itself is a key After any review, they’ll simply return to managing the projectdeterminant of the overall effectiveness of the governance the way they see fit, resulting in two sets of books—the realprogram. one and the one presented outside of the team.To support lean development, a pragmatic governance body An effective approach for lean development is to create a smallrespects people by focusing on enabling IT professionals first, central team, often referred to as a governance competencyand on controlling and managing them second. It does this by center, which is extended with part-time members from thecreating an environment where people can be effective in governed IT organizations and the appropriate business units.practice and not just in management theory. Such an Making key representatives of the governed organizations partenvironment promotes situation-specific strategies, procedures of the governance body avoids a “us versus them” mentalityand practices; provides teams with access to the resources they and helps ensure that governance guidance is relevant andneed, including ready access to business stakeholders; and actionable. Picking the right people for the governance body isprovides guidance, support and mentoring to teams that have absolutely crucial. Very often the people who jump at thedeviated from expected norms. chance to volunteer for a governance body are the people you least want governing.
  6. 6. 6 Agility@ScaleStaged program delivery There are several benefits to staged program delivery. First, byStaged program delivery enables you to optimize the whole grouping projects according to business objectives, andprogram while still completing projects quickly. Programs, managing them as a program, you can more effectively deliverwhich are collections of related projects, should be rolled out on major business objectives. Second, using a control projectincrementally over time. Instead of holding back a release to provides well-defined governance milestones for the programwait for a subproject, each subproject must sign up for a that focus on risk and variance reduction as well as valuepredetermined release date. If the subproject misses the date, it creation. Third, dividing a potentially large program deliversskips to the next release, minimizing the impact to the value incrementally around business subgoals. And finally,customers of the program. Think of a train schedule. If the semi-independent execution of projects enables more efficientproject misses the release train, it has to wait for the next one. development because each project has as much tacticalGranted, because of dependencies between projects, sometimes flexibility as possible to support higher project missing the release train causes several to do so. It is a good strategy to manage programs with loosely coupledAs you see in Figure 2, usage of a control project enables individual projects, by a control project run according to fourcoordinated execution of the program while providing phases: inception, elaboration, construction and transition.flexibility in execution of individual projects within the control Ideally the individual projects should take an evolutionaryproject. Iterations play a fundamental role here, because they approach, using agile processes such as Disciplined Agileprovide stable anchoring points to allow projects to drive and Delivery (DAD), Scrum or OpenUP.validate meaningful cross-project integration.Figure 2: As illustrated by Bittner and Spence in Managing Iterative Software Development Projects, risk reduction and value creationcan be effectively addressed by managing a program stage through a control project.
  7. 7. IBM Software 7Business-driven project pipeline are not interested in managing large teams of people. You willThe demand for IT projects always exceeds available resources. lose qualified people if the only senior roles in your ITA business-driven project pipeline maximizes the business organization are management positions. Effective humanvalue of development investments by enabling organizations to resources (HR) policies can help you increase your pool ofprioritize and optimize projects in alignment with business resources and retain skilled staff.goals and objectives. This alignment can be accomplished withscorecards and other portfolio management strategies that help Align stakeholder policies with IT valuesyou assess each project against a set of parameters you define You can easily derail software development projects withto measure business value. Lean thinking encourages ill-fitting business practices. For example, many organizationsorganizations to focus on no more than five parameters and use will insist on an “accurate” cost estimate at the beginning of ascoring as an aid in a business discussion about prioritization software development project. This proves unrealistic inrather than as a strict measure. practice because requirements evolve over the life of a project10 and because there are so many uncertainties in a project, whichScenario-driven development leads to a variance in your estimate.Scenario-driven development provides the business context inwhich to drive effective software development projects. The Besides being unrealistic, stakeholder demand for an accuratewhole cannot be defined without understanding the parts, and estimate up front motivates development teams to adopt riskythe parts cannot be defined in detail without understanding the practices such as detailed requirements definitions early in thewhole. If you don’t know how the parts impact the overall project.11 Although it is expected that the business will put costsolution, you can get bogged down in building components and schedule constraints on software development teams, thethat don’t fit together. To understand the big picture of the way in which it does so must reflect the realities of thebusiness, you can identify usage scenarios at both the develop-ment lifecycle and must be flexible enough to allowenterprise and project levels using approaches such as use-case development teams to remain effective.12flow down7 or green threads.8 These techniques help eachproject team see how its part fits into the whole. They also In short, your business stakeholders must have realistic policiesimprove collaboration among and between teams and serve as for engaging IT, including how projects are funded, howconsistent control mechanisms by focusing developer attention requirements are documented, and the level and kind ofon system integrations. involvement stakeholders will have with software development project teams.Practices for organizationTwo lean practices guide definition of the appropriate Lean thinking encourages business stakeholders to be activeorganizational climate to support agile development.9 Applying participants on development teams. IT professionals should bethese practices can help you better leverage people as a critical responsible for educating stakeholders in the fundamentals ofresource. modern software development so they understand the options available to them and the implications of their decisions.Align HR policies with IT values Conversely, IT professionals should learn the fundamentals ofHiring, retaining and promoting technical staff requires business value management so they can provide the earliestdifferent strategies than those for non-IT staff. To reward possible warning when project costs are in danger of exceedingdesired behaviors, you need to ensure that incentives are the expected business value. The benefits of these practicesappropriate for the mind-set of your technical staff. For include increased probability of project success and improvedexample, many IT professionals want to expand their technical software economics due to improved decision making.skills so they can work on more challenging projects. Yet most
  8. 8. 8 Agility@ScaleBusiness stakeholders must play an active scope. If the estimation of effort is off due to unforeseen events or difficulties, it is the scope that must give and be reassessed inrole on development project teams. the next iteration. Second, the definitions of “final product” and “complete” may evolve significantly from their originalPractices for development processes conceptions during project execution when the businessFive lean practices promote strategies for running a project stakeholders and implementers agree that doing so betterefficiently and effectively.13 satisfies business objectives. Each iteration of the project will increase the shared understanding of requirements. Third,Iterative development time boxing forces fast decision making and a crisp focus onUsing an iterative development approach, a project is what matters most—the regular delivery of working software.organized into a sequence of short iterations (referred to as Note that delivery isn’t always into production. Sometimes it’s“sprints” in Scrum14). Each iteration is time boxed and has a just into a test environment. The regular delivery of workingwell-defined set of objectives. The aim of each iteration is software increases the number of feedback opportunitiescom-plete, defect-free, working code. because stakeholders can easily see whether IT understands what they’ve asked for. It also enables fact-based governanceDuring each iteration, you build on the work of previous because working software is a concrete representation of whatiterations to evolve the requirements, analysis, design, a team has accomplished; whereas secondary artifacts such asimplementation and test assets until the final product is plans or specifications are merely promises that the team maycomplete (see Figure 3). There are several key benefits to this deliver at some point.approach. First, the length of each iteration is fixed, not theFigure 3: Based on frequent demonstrations and stakeholder feedback, the small course corrections early in the lifecycle of aniterative (“modern”) project lead to more rapid success, compared to a “waterfall” project.
  9. 9. IBM Software 9Most important, an iterative approach increases your ability to Risk-based milestonesbuild systems that meet the changing needs of your Iterative development is most effective when you combine itstakeholders. IBM recommends four-week-long iterations by with a deliberate balance of early risk reduction and early valuedefault.15 As you recognize that some other length for creation through risk-based milestones. This means that, asiterations is more appropriate for the context of a project, you prioritize the work for each iteration, you choose tochange the iteration length to reflect that context. You should develop those features that represent the biggest business,strive for the shortest iteration length possible for your organizational, programmatic and technical risks whileenvironment because the longer the iteration length the delivering the most value. Because these two objectives—greater the risk of allowing needless bureaucracy to creep into greatest risk and greatest value—are not usually aligned, theyour software delivery processes. There should be no time risk-based milestones approach of Disciplined Agile Deliverybetween iterations: all activities—from evaluating progress (DAD) or Unified Process (UP) forces a deliberate choicethrough planning and executing the next iteration—are an between maximizing early value creation and early riskintegral part of an iteration, not a superimposed external reduction. Both are fundamental for project success (see Figureprocess. 4), so it is important to have the right control points in place.Figure 4: Risk reduction (teal curve) and value (dashed blue curve) during the project lifecycle
  10. 10. 10 Agility@ScaleThroughout a Disciplined Agile Delivery (DAD) project there calling out eight scaling factors: geographic distribution, teamare light-weight management milestones requiring project size, regulatory compliance, domain complexity, technicaldeliverables to be assessed for risk reduction and value complexity, organizational complexity, organizationcreation. For example, at the end of the Inception phase you distribution, and enterprise discipline.should verify that a shared stakeholder consensus around visionand plan for the current release has been reached. Early in the We have two critical observations about tailoring your processConstruction phase the team needs to demonstrate that it has to meet your needs. First, a flexible, practices-based processan executable architecture, with a few selected scenarios that framework allows you to maximize reuse across lines ofcan be executed, and with a risk list that reflects the mitigation business (LOB) and projects while enabling flexibility so theyof many key technical and other risks. This risk reduction can adapt the process to their needs. For example, a givenneeds to be balanced with the value of the running code to project cares about eight specific practices right now becauseshow concrete evidence that the team has made actual they address the challenges faced by that team. Another teamprogress. Note that Rational Unified Process (RUP) takes a may focus on six practices, with four in common with the otherslightly different approach with an explicit phase called project team, because they face a different situation. The IBMElaboration which focuses on proving the architecture with practices library is a good resource [27]. Second, a projectworking code – DAD adopted the strategy of proving the team should also adapt process ceremony to lifecycle phase.architecture with working code from RUP but combined its The beginning of a project is typically accompanied byElaboration and Construction phases into one. IBM considerable uncertainty, and you want to encourage a lot ofrecommends adopting a risk-value lifecycle which includes creativity to develop an application that addresses the businessexplicit milestones.16 You can adopt similar strategies even if needs. More process typically reduces creativity, so you shouldyou are following other agile processes such as Scrum or use less process at the beginning of a project when uncertaintyExtreme Programming (XP). is an everyday factor. On the other hand, late in the project you often want to introduce more control, such as feature freeze orRisk-based milestones provide greater stakeholder insight and change-control boards, to remove unpredictability and riskscontrol and promote early value creation. They also help associated with the late introduction of defects.reduce the chance of project failure and can improveproductivity by driving out technical risks early, helping to Continuous improvementthereby reduce overall project risk. Lean-thinking organizations strive to continually improve processes. IBM recommends performing an assessment, suchProcess adaptation as a retrospective,17 at the end of each iteration and at projectBecause all projects are not created equal, it is critical to adapt end to capture lessons learned, and leverage that knowledge tothe development process to the needs of the project. A team improve the process.developing a Web site will work differently than a teamdeveloping a data warehouse. A team of 5 people will work The fundamental concept behind continuous improvement isdifferently than a team of 50. A team developing a life-critical simple: improve the way you work whenever the opportunitysystem will work differently than a team building a business presents itself. The old recommendation “You should learnapplication. It is not a question of more process being better or something new every day” is a good one. Furthermore, thisless process being better. Rather, the amount of ceremony, practice goes one step further and recommends that you act onprecision and control present in a project must be tailored to a what you learn and increase your overall effectiveness.variety of factors. The Agile Scaling Model (ASM) [26] definesa contextual framework for understanding the range of There are several ways that you can identify potentialsituations which IT delivery teams face, agile or otherwise, improvements to your software process during the execution of
  11. 11. IBM Software 11a software project. For example, you could include informal Simple and relevant metricsimprovement sessions or staff suggestion boxes or Web sites. Simple and relevant metrics provide the information necessaryOr you could encourage personal reflection and provide teams to understand how you are doing so you can take correctivewith an editable process (perhaps via a wiki). An effective actions as needed. Sadly, most organizations either use nostrategy is to schedule two hours at the end of each iteration metrics at all—meaning they’re effectively flying blind—orfor an informal retrospective. The practice of continuous they overdo it. They collect so many measurements that theyimprovement enables you to learn as you go and gives the team drown in data.clear control over its destiny. Effective metrics are relevant because they are commonly usedEmbedded compliance throughout your organization, and they provide theThe easier compliance is to achieve, the greater the chance IT information managers and executives need to take timely,professionals will actually comply. Therefore, compliance to appropriate action. When done right, simple and relevantregulations, corporate policies and guidance should be metrics enable fact-based governance. When such metrics areautomated wherever possible. When automation isn’t an automated, they enable painless governance. And when theyoption, compliance-related tasks should be part of your culture are used to explore critical trends, they enable proactiveand daily activities, rather than a set of tasks done as a separate governance.and late-in-the-game effort. Compliance becomes part of yourculture when people understand why it’s important and what It’s best to start with metrics that explore the value beingthe underlying principles are behind it. If compliance requires delivered by teams, the quality being delivered by the projectsignificant amounts of extra work, particularly when that work and the cost being expended. Not only are these metrics usefulis perceived to be onerous or arbitrary by the people doing it, for determining the current status of your projects, but they’rethen chances are greater that your compliance effort will be also useful for determining how far a team has deviated fromsubverted by development teams. initial expectations. Expectations are set at the business case level for time, spending and use of resources, and may beThe benefits of embedding compliance include reducing your updated periodically throughout the project. Bear in mind thatoverall compliance costs, reducing pushback from development the fundamental rule of all business metrics—measure theteams, and achieving higher levels of compliance than with thing that you actually want to control—applies equally totraditional approaches. IBM recommends that you define a development project metrics. For example, if you want tominimal solution that can be integrated into your process and improve code quality, don’t measure the number of bugs based on the intent of the appropriate regulations. A key Measure the number of bugs remaining. When the true goal isconsideration is assigning the right people to interpret the hard to measure, it is often tempting to substitute a more easilyregulations and create guidelines for development teams to quantified proxy that you believe tracks the true goal. Forfollow. If you assign bureaucrats to this effort, you will end up example, your true goal might be to improve overall ROI, butwith a bureaucratic solution. you choose to measure costs instead. Hard experience has shown that inevitably people will focus on the thing that isPractices for measurement actually measured. Over time the proxy will becomeWithin the measures category of development governance, increasingly decoupled from and thus unreliable as a measureIBM recommends two lean practices that foster informed of the true goal. Worse yet, the greater the rewards ordecision making with supporting targets and incentives.18 punishments associated with the proxy measure, the faster this divergence will happen. It is better to roughly measure the true goal than to precisely measure a proxy.
  12. 12. 12 Agility@ScaleContinuous project monitoring structure in which it operates. The team assumes theYou can regularly monitor the health of the IT projects within responsibility of doing the work the way it chooses. Teamyour organization through automated metrics collection, members select their own activities, everyone commits to theproject milestone reviews, postmortem reviews and even word work and the team coordinates regularly. This is a participatoryof mouth. Continuous project monitoring, combined with approach to decision making in which everyone has theiterative development, enables fact based governance by opportunity to provide input and listen to the decision-makingproviding up-to-date and accurate metrics based on delivered process.code versus assessments of specifications. This monitoringenables earlier problem detection, allowing you to take Self-organization works well when combined with iterativecorrective actions sooner and enabling effective governance development because the iterative approach allows the teamwhen you monitor the right metrics. IBM suggests that you and its stakeholders to agree on what should be delivered inbegin by automatically capturing and displaying your metrics the next iteration. At the end of the iteration, the team and allvia dashboard software. At you can see stakeholders assess what was done, and corrective actions areexamples of live project dashboards for the various Jazz taken. Although the team takes collective responsibility, theproduct teams, dashboards which display information ultimate responsibility and associated decision rights lie withgenerated by the development tools being used by the project the manager. Iterations provide a control mechanism to keepteams themselves. Furthermore, it’s possible to roll up self-organized teams from going off in undesirable direc¬tions.project-focused metrics to the portfolio level, and drill down Benefits from self-organization include:into the details as needed [28]. But, don’t try to manage by thenumbers alone. When a project seems to be deviating from its • Higher motivation that can lead to increased productivityexpected course, you should talk with the project team to • Decisions being made at the right place within thedetermine what is actually happening and whether team organizational structure because teams are empowered withmembers need help from you. both the responsibility and the authority to get the job done • Fewer opportunities for errors because of betterPractices for roles and responsibilities communication and fewer transitions of work productsThe two lean practices in the roles and responsibilities between individuals.governance category focus on enabling development by • Greater opportunities for people to increase their skills.making it clear who is responsible, who has authority and towhom these people are accountable.19 In short, project teams must have the authority to organizePromote self-organizing teams themselves, their work environment and their overall approachThe first value of agile software development is to foster as they see fit to effectively achieve project results. Anyindividuals and interactions over processes and tools.20 When it constraints placed on the team, such as organizational guidancecomes to lean development governance, the focus should be on (eg. coding standards, data guidelines, security guidelines, andenabling IT professionals to build high-quality working usability guidelines), must be described to and negotiated withsoftware and promoting effective collaboration among team the team throughout the project. Our experience is thatmembers, instead of trying to control or directly manage them. effective agile teams balance self-organization with appropriate governance, something which is built into IBM’s DisciplinedA self-organizing team has the authority to allocate the work Agile Delivery (DAD) process framework.that it will perform within the scope of the governance
  13. 13. IBM Software 13Align team structure with context appropriately. Within IBM Software Group we’ve applied thisIt is important to align team structure with the context of the strategy for several common components which needed tosituation in which the team finds itelf. Conway’s law, defined evolve quickly to support the needs of several disparate teamsby Melvin Conway in the late 1960s,21 tells us that any piece of who wanted to reuse the components. We found that in suchsoftware reflects the organizational structure of the group that situations a component team became overwhelmed withproduced it (or succinctly, “You ship your organization”). change requests and couldn’t easily support the required rate ofPeople will work in a manner that reflects the way they are change. This strategy work well in organizations with anorganized. In other words, a decentralized group is likely to existing and strong open source culture.produce a system with a decentralized architecture. Anystrengths or weaknesses in a project team’s organizational 4. Specialist teams - A specialist team focuses on the workstructure will inevitably be reflected in the resulting solution required for a single development discipline, such asthat it produces. programming, testing, or architecture. Each subteam does their portion of the overall work to implement the requiredFor large delivery teams there are four fundamental strategies, functionality and then hands off to the next subteam(s) downwhich can and often are combined, for organizing their the line. This strategy works well for organizations which stillstructure: have IT departments comprised mostly of specialists. The authors do not recommend this strategy for anything but a last1. Component teams - With this strategy a subteam is resort due to the significant bureaucratic burden of organizingresponsible for one or more components of the technical such teams, of validating the work when it is handed-offarchitecture. A component may be a large scale domain between teams, the increase traceability burden, and othercomponent, such as payment processing within a similar problems.manufacturing company, a collection of web services, atechnical framework (i.e. a security framework), or a Practices for policies and standardssubsystem. This strategy works well when the architecture of The three lean practices underlying governance policies andthe overall system is highly cohesive and loosely coupled and standards describe specific guidelines to support consistentwhen the requirements are easily assigned to a single operation among the various parties involved withcomponent (large requirements which span components would development.22need to be divided into small requirements which do not). The first value of agile software development is to prefer2. Feature teams - A feature team is responsible for fully individuals and interactions over processes and tools. Thisimplementing a given requirement, the feature, regardless of doesn’t imply that you won’t have any processes and tools atthe number of components the change affects. This strategy all, it simply states that they should be secondary to people,works well in environments with developers with a and the tools and processes should reflect the way that peoplecomprehensive knowledge about the system the are working work, not the other way around. With a lean approach toon, a sophisticated change and control process, and a governance your organization will adopt policies and standardscontinuous integration approach.’ that enable developers to collaborate effectively, that motivate them to develop and reuse existing infrastructure and assets,3. Internal open source - The basic idea is that the artifacts for and that enable them to do high-quality work. If there is aa component are made available internally within your conflict between effective individual behaviors and toolorganization in an open source manner and people from behaviors, the tool should concede.various development teams will evolve the artifacts
  14. 14. 14 Agility@ScaleIntegrated lifecycle environment There are significant organizational benefits to supportingSoftware development relies on intense collaboration among valued IT assets, including increased consistency and efficiency,team members at separate sites who frequently work different improved time to market, improved communication andhours or in different time zones. The sheer size of many decreased governance costs. IT departments should maintaindevelopment efforts also makes collaboration difficult because coding standards for their primary development languages, ayou need to support large-scale interactions. Added to the library of common patterns that they wish to promote withinchallenge is the need for management oversight and the their systems, reference architectures for critical aspects ofnecessary bookkeeping to ensure regulatory compliance. their technical infrastructure, and a description of the visionIntegrated lifecycle environments are built to enable for their enterprise architecture. There should also be peoplecollaboration at the lowest possible cost enabling infrastructure in place to support, evolve, and purchase or harvest thesefor most if not all the other governance practices. valued IT assets. An asset repository, such as IBM Rational Asset Manager (RAM), is critical to enable IT professionals toKey components of an integrated lifecycle environment find and manage the reusable assets available to them, and toinclude tools for software configuration management, analysis, capture and enforce policies related to asset creation and, construction, test, quality assurance, process And, it’s important to have metrics in place that can identifymanagement and project management. Lean integrated and reduce barriers to reuse, as well as measure the value oflifecycle environments such as the IBM Rational Application different elements of the reuse effort.Lifecycle Management (ALM) solution, facilitateimplementation of all or almost all of the identified governance Wherever possible you should buy rather than build an ITpractices. They help you lower your total cost of ownership asset, particularly if you can easily acquire something that(TCO) for tool environments, and enable collaboration. And, meets your needs, and thereby put the maintenance burden onthe best tool environments will automatically capture as much someone else.audit and metric data as possible with as little drag ondevelopers’ work as possible. Flexible architectures One of the aims of lean software development governance is toValued corporate assets enable flexibility and responsiveness in your business, which inAn IT asset is any software component, service, template, turn requires flexibility and responsiveness in how youenterprise model, reference architecture, example, pattern, organize and evolve your IT systems. Lean governance isguideline or standard that the organization expects IT enabled by flexible architectures because they enableprofessionals to apply in their everyday work. A valued IT asset development teams to react effectively to the changing needsis one that IT professionals actually want to apply, typically of the business. Currently the most flexible approaches tobecause they are viewed as both relevant to the task at hand architecture are through open computing and serviceand of sufficiently high quality. In other words, IT orientation and through the adoption of lean developmentprofessionals take advantage of the IT assets available to them techniques such as Agile Model Driven Development,23 Testbecause the assets actually enable them to increase their Driven Development (TDD),24 and continuous integration.25productivity. Flexible architectures can support evolving business needs, reduce time to market, increase ROI, lower TCO and reduceDevelopers follow the enterprise architecture and appropriate technical risk. By default, IBM recommends service-orientedreference architectures because those assets save them time. architectures (SOAs), open source technologies such asTheir systems invoke existing services, so they can take Eclipse, and standards such as Java™ Platform, Enterpriseadvantage of existing technical infrastructure. The key is to Edition (Java EE) and Unified Modeling Language (UML)..make it easier to reuse assets than to build them again.
  15. 15. IBM Software 15Conclusion AuthorsEvery IT organization has a development governance program Scott W. Ambler, Chief Methodologist for Agile and Lean, Rationalin place, but this program may not be explicit and it may not Software, IBM Software Groupbe effective. Traditional development governance frameworkshave had limited success because developers are intellectual Per Kroll, Chief Solution Architect, Measured Improvements, Rationalworkers who don’t work well under command-and-control Software, IBM Software Groupapproaches. To be effective, a governance program must reflectthe actual environment in which it is being applied, and take Endnotesinto consideration the people involved. We’d like to thank Cheri Bergeron, Lynn Brennan, Murray Cantor, Bernie Coyne, Clay M. Nelson, Bob Noble, Ted Rivera and Carl Zetie for theSuccessful development governance focuses on enabling the feedback and insights they provided for this paper.right behaviors and the best practices through collaborativeand supportive techniques. It proves to be far more effective to 1 Kroll, Per; “Making Agile Mainstream: Crossing the Chasm”; IBMmotivate people to do the right thing instead of forcing them Rational Edge; kroll; 2007to do so. The 18 practices IBM has identified for leandevelopment governance reflect the realities of software 2 Cantor, Murray and Sanders, John D.; “Operational IT Governance”; IBM Rational Edge; today. These practices can enable you to embed may07/cantor_sanders/index.html; May 2007governance in your tools, processes and development guidance. 3 Poppendieck, Mary and Poppendieck, Tom; Implementing Lean SoftwareThey support such modern approaches to development as Development: From Concept to Cash; Addison-Wesley Professional; Boston;Lean Software Development, Scrum, XP, Rational Unified 2006Process (RUP), Disciplined Agile Delivery (DAD), and Eclipse 4 Ambler, S. W. and Kroll, Per; “Best practices for lean developmentWay. governance—Part 1: Principles and Organizations”; IBM Rational Edge;; 2007Development governance is only part of the overall IT and 5 Kroll, P. and MacIsaac, B.; Agility and Discipline Made Easy—Practices fromsystems engineering governance picture, but it’s an important OpenUP and RUP; Addison-Wesley Professional; Pearson Education, Inc.;one. By streamlining the flow of work performed by the team, Boston; 2006a lean approach to governance can help you improve the value 6 Bittner, K. and Spence, I.; Managing Iterative Software Development Projects;provided by development projects. Addison-Wesley Professional; Boston; 2006 7 Cantor, M.; “Requirements Analysis and Design Part 3”; IBM RationalFor more information Edge; RationalEdge/oct03/m_rupse_mc.pdf; 2003To learn more about the Rational tools that can help youimplement lean development governance practices, contact 8 Nightingale, J. ; “Green Threads: Improving Cross-Product Integration”; Dr. Dobb’s Journal;; 2006your IBM representative or 9 Ambler, S. W. and Kroll, P.; “Best practices for lean development governance—Part 1: Principles and Organizations”; IBM Rational Edge;; 2007For an all-in-one lean development solution, learn more aboutIBM Rational Team Concert at: 10 Kroll, P. and Royce, W.; “Key Principles for Business-Driven Development”; IBM Rational Edge; rational/library/oct05/kroll; 2005 Ambler, Scott W.; “Examining the “Big Requirements Up Front (BRUF)” 11 Approach”;; 2005
  16. 16. Ambler, Scott W.; “Agile on a Fixed Budget”; Dr. Dobb’s Journal;; 2006 © Copyright IBM Corporation 2011 Ambler, S. W. and Kroll, Per; “Best practices for lean development13governance—Part 2: Processes and Measures”; IBM Rational Edge; http:// IBM; 2007 Software Group Route 10014 Agile Alliance; The Agile Manifesto;; 2001 Somers, NY 10589 U.S.A. Cantor, Murray and Kruchten. P.; Rational Unified Process Made Easy—A15Practitioner’s Guide to the RUP; Addison-Wesley Professional; Pearson Produced in the United States of AmericaEducation, Inc.; Boston; 2003 January 2011 All Rights Reserved Kroll, P. and MacIsaac, B; Agility and Discipline Made Easy—Practices from16OpenUP and RUP; Addison-Wesley Professional; Pearson Education, Inc.; IBM, the IBM logo, Rational and are trademarks or registeredBoston; 2006 trademarks of International Business Machines Corporation in the United States, other countries, or both. If these and other IBM trademarked terms Kerth, Norman L; Project Retrospectives: A Handbook for Team Reviews;17 are marked on their first occurrence in this information with a trademarkDorset House; New York; 2001 symbol (® or ™), these symbols indicate U.S. registered or common law Ambler, S. W. and Kroll, Per; “Best practices for lean development18 trademarks owned by IBM at the time this information was published. Suchgovernance—Part 2: Processes and Measures”; IBM Rational Edge; http:// trademarks may also be registered or common law trademarks in; 2007 countries. A current list of IBM trademarks is available on the Web at “Copyright and trademark information” at Ambler, S. W. and Kroll, Per; “Best practices for lean developmentgovernance—Part 3: Roles and Policies”; IBM Rational Edge; http://www. Other company, product and service names may be trademarks or; 2007 marks of others.20 Agile Alliance; The Agile Manifesto;; 2001 References in this publication to IBM products and services do not imply that IBM intends to make them available in all countries in which21 Conway, M. E.; “How Do Committees Invent?”; Datamation Magazine; IBM operates.; 1968 The information contained in this documentation is provided for22 Ambler, S. W. and Kroll, Per; “Best practices for lean development informational purposes only. While efforts were made to verify thegovernance—Part 3: Roles and Policies”; IBM Rational Edge; http://www. completeness and accuracy of the information contained in; 2007 documentation, it is provided “as is” without warranty of any kind, express or implied. Ambler, S. W.; The Object Primer 3rd Edition: Agile Model Driven23Development with UML 2; Cambridge University Press; New York; 2005 Please Recycle Astels, D.; Test-Driven Development: A Practical Guide; Addison Wesley;24Upper Saddle River, New Jersey; 2003 IBM; Rational Build Forge;; 200726 Ambler, S.W.; “The Agile Scaling Model (ASM): Adapting Agile Methods forComplex Environments”;; 200927 IBM; IBM Practices Plugins for Rational Method Composer;; 201028 IBM; Rational Executive Dashboard;; 2010 IBM; IBM Rational Asset Manager;; 2010 RAW14000-USEN-01