INTERNATIONALMechanical Engineering and Technology (IJMET), ISSN 0976 – International Journal of JOURNAL OF MECHANICAL ENG...
International Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Technology (IJMET), ISSN 0976 –6340(Print), ISSN 0976 – 6359(Online) V...
International Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Technology (IJMET), ISSN 0976 –6340(Print), ISSN 0976 – 6359(Online) V...
International Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Technology (IJMET), ISSN 0976 –6340(Print), ISSN 0976 – 6359(Online) V...
International Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Technology (IJMET), ISSN 0976 –6340(Print), ISSN 0976 – 6359(Online) V...
International Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Technology (IJMET), ISSN 0976 –6340(Print), ISSN 0976 – 6359(Online) V...
International Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Technology (IJMET), ISSN 0976 –6340(Print), ISSN 0976 – 6359(Online) V...
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×

Web based e manufacturing of prototypes by using rapid prototyping technology

283

Published on

0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total Views
283
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
0
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
14
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

Web based e manufacturing of prototypes by using rapid prototyping technology

  1. 1. INTERNATIONALMechanical Engineering and Technology (IJMET), ISSN 0976 – International Journal of JOURNAL OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING 6340(Print), ISSN 0976 – 6359(Online) Volume 4, Issue 2, March - April (2013) © IAEME AND TECHNOLOGY (IJMET)ISSN 0976 – 6340 (Print)ISSN 0976 – 6359 (Online)Volume 4, Issue 2, March - April (2013), pp. 32-38 IJMET© IAEME: www.iaeme.com/ijmet.aspJournal Impact Factor (2013): 5.7731 (Calculated by GISI)www.jifactor.com ©IAEME WEB BASED E- MANUFACTURING OF PROTOTYPES BY USING RAPID PROTOTYPING TECHNOLOGY Raju B S1, Chandra Sekhar U 2, Drakshayani D N 3 1 Associate Professor, Mechanical Engineering, Reva Institute of Technology and Management, Yelahanka, Bangalore: 560064, Karnataka. 2 Scientist G, GTRE, C.V.Raman Nagar, DRDO, Bangalore: 560093 3 Professor, Mechanical Engineering, Sir.M.VIT, Bangalore, Karnataka. ABSTRACT There is an industrial need for rapid manufacture of one-off intricate prototypes, for defense, vintage equipment and medical prosthetics. This paper presents a systematic approach for this purpose, using a combination of reverse engineering, solid modeling, rapid prototyping, rapid tooling and Internet technologies. Rapid prototyping and Manufacturing technology, involves automated fabrication of intricate shapes using a layer-by-layer principle, has matured over the last decade which posses high potential to reduce the cycle time and cost of product development as one of the enabling tool in digital manufacturing. Web based Rapid Prototyping & Manufacturing techniques enhances the design and manufacturing productivity, speed, economy and reduction in lead time. Two basic characteristics of RP make it eminently suited to web based e-manufacturing: (1) The main input is a solid model of the part in a facetted format stored in a STL file (generated by 3D scanning an existing part of by solid modeling) and (2) the fabrication process is highly automated; no part-specific tooling is required. In practice, there are a large number of combinations of RP and RT, besides a choice of materials and fabrication equipment. These decisions greatly influence the quality of parts (in terms of surface finish, dimensional accuracy, strength and life) as well as the lead time and cost. Thus the paper also presents the experimental investigation to demonstrate the methodology and bench marking major RP/RT methods to fabricate the prototypes for various applications such as functional testing, Mechanical dynamic testing and patterns for casting. Keywords: Solid modeling, E-Manufacturing, Rapid prototyping, Rapid tooling, Internet based manufacturing 32
  2. 2. International Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Technology (IJMET), ISSN 0976 –6340(Print), ISSN 0976 – 6359(Online) Volume 4, Issue 2, March - April (2013) © IAEME1. INTRODUCTION Due to the advances in mechanical, electronics and computers components, there has beensignificant growth in communication, information technology and worldwide networking, whichleads to globalization and opening of markets, hence increases in worldwide competition amongindustries. The evolution of the market necessitated the reduction of time to market mainlybecause the product life cycle is shorter but also because it is very important to proceed morerapidly from an initial conception to mass production object [1]. Introducing new products at ever increasing rates is crucial for remaining successful in acompetitive global economy; decreasing product development cycle times and increasing productcomplexity require new ways to realize innovative ideas. In response to these challenges, industryand academia have invented a spectrum of technologies that help to develop new products and tobroaden the number of product alternatives. Examples of these technologies include feature-baseddesign, design for manufacturability analysis, simulation, computational prototyping, and virtualand physical prototyping. Most designers agree that “getting physical fast” is critical in exploringnovel design concepts. The sooner designers experiment with new products, the faster they gaininspiration for further design changes [2] Rapid prototyping is the name given to a host of related technologies that are used tofabricate physical objects directly from CAD data sources. These methods are unique in that theyadd and bond materials in layers to form objects. Such techniques offer advantages compared toclassical subtractive fabrication methods such as milling or turning in following ways: Objects can be formed with any geometric complexity or intricacy without the need for elaborate machine setup or final assembly, Objects can be made from multiple materials, or as composites, or materials can even be varied in a controlled fashion at any location in an object, Solid freeform fabrication systems reduce the construction of complex objects to a manageable, straightforward, and relatively fast process.Thus, the commercially available RP techniques are: SLA, SLS, FDM, 3DP, LOM, IJP and SGC.2. RAPID PROTOTYPING & ITS SIGNIFICANCE Introducing new products at ever increasing rates is crucial for remaining successful in acompetitive global economy; decreasing product development cycle times and increasing productcomplexity require new ways to realize innovative ideas. In response to these challenges, industryand academia have invented a spectrum of technologies that help to develop new products and tobroaden the number of product alternatives. Examples of these technologies include feature-baseddesign, design for manufacturability analysis, simulation, computational prototyping, and virtualand physical prototyping. Most designers agree that “getting physical fast” is critical in exploringnovel design concepts. The sooner designers experiment with new products, the faster they gaininspiration for further design changes [10]. The Rapid prototyping (RP) technology, involvesautomated fabrication of geometrical shapes using a layer-by-layer principle from computer-Aided-Design (CAD) data. “Rapid prototyping can be defined as solid free form productionthrough computer automated, layer manufacturing which allows the transformation of digitaldesign into 3D solid object for production of models, prototypes and tooling”. The figure 1illustrates the methodology adopted for the rapid prototyping techniques. 33
  3. 3. International Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Technology (IJMET), ISSN 0976 –6340(Print), ISSN 0976 – 6359(Online) Volume 4, Issue 2, March - April (2013) © IAEME Figure 1. RP MethodologyIn the field of product development, particularly product modeling has become quite criticalin industrial performance improvement. The art of managing rapid product developmentdepends on making good trade-offs between four possible objectives in any productdevelopment cycle. * Development Speed * Product cost * Performance and * Development program expense2. RAPID DEVELOPMENT OF PROTOTYPES FOR CASTINGS Development of prototypes/pattern for one-off intricate castings involves thechallenges of economic viability, quick tooling development and producing defect-freecasting at the first attempt. These challenges can be overcome by making use of RP processfor developing casting patterns for sand as well as investment casting. While RP may seemslow, it is much faster than the weeks or months required to manufacture the tooling byconventional machining processes, especially for complex shapes.The RP processes can be used for directly producing the casting patterns, referred to as directrapid tooling. The RP parts can also be used as masters for ‘soft tooling’ processes such asepoxy mass casting, PU face casting, metal spray and RTV moulding. Thus, the combinationof RP and soft tooling methods can give indirect routes for casting tooling development.Example an FDM process(ABS-plastic master pattern), which converted into an epoxy moldby mass casting and finally converted into a production pattern by PU face casting, Thus thedifferent RP techniques of each model and materials available for each RP and RT processgive a large number of potential routes. In recent era, several researchers have explored rapidcasting development using RP and RT. Casting produced by LOM patterns were found to bearound 25% cast saving [3] and LOM tooling yielding about 50% saving in time and cast 34
  4. 4. International Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Technology (IJMET), ISSN 0976 –6340(Print), ISSN 0976 – 6359(Online) Volume 4, Issue 2, March - April (2013) © IAEMEcompared to aluminum tooling [4]. The various patterns produced for various applicationsdirectly from FDM process about 73% less time compared to any other conventional methods[5]. Stereolithography which is commonly known as master of RP systems which producesepoxy resin prototypes were used in investment casting to produce foundry tooling andcastings, saving time up to 50% and proven with more cost effective than conventionalmethods. Today’s global environment can enable people to go “from Object to object” asshown in fig 2 through 3D digitizing and reverse engineering. Part modeling and Rapidmanufacturing of parts, both directly and indirectly using rapid tooling. Knowledge andknow-how regarding new technologies should also be accessible for integration in theproduct process during the design stage. In the course of Rapid product development, thenature of data changes. Consequently, the numerical reference model should coherentlysupport different data formats, depending on the technologies and the design process stages.The new technology initiative based on the STEP (Standard for Exchange of Product ModelData) format which is used to define heterogeneous and multi-material object datamanagement [7]. There is an industrial need for rapid manufacture of one-off intricate prototype castingfor defense, vintage equipment and medical prosthetics. The RP and RT technologies providethe solution, but are limited by the high costs of installation and maintenance. Thus this canbe overcome by using Web-based technologies, to create e-manufacturing systems. A numberof researchers have explored the application of Internet for engineering purposes. Most ofthem have mainly focused on faster and effective communications and on virtual reality. IM(Internet Manufacturing) proposed for the development of a distributed rapid prototypingsystem via the internet to form a frame work of IM for the support of effective productdevelopment [6]3. E-MANUFACTUIRNG OF PROTOTYPES Two basic characteristics of RP make it eminently suited to e-manufacturing: (1) themain input is a solid model part in an STL file format which can be produced directly fromsolid part or by reversing engineering techniques. (2) The fabrication process which is highlyautomated without any specific tooling (TOOL LESS ADDITIVE PROCESS). Thus it ispossible to model the part or tooling in one location and get the part automatically fabricatedin another location by sending the data information of the model through the Internet facility.The various step of casting pattern development can be compressed by web-enabling the PR& RT route which is described below. 1. Switch on the server of the RP and forward the STL file of the pattern of the model to the manufactured. 2. The STL file is checked and errors such as tessellation error, dangling edges and missing facets if any, are fixed. 3. Thus the automatic generation of quotation depending on the pattern volume. 4. Once for all the acceptance of the customer is made, process planning is done automatically for the part. 5. The part manufacturing is done on the RP machines, followed by post processing and finally for dispatch. 6. The related invoice and forms are generated automatically and forwarded by e-mail & then further forwarded for dispatch. 35
  5. 5. International Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Technology (IJMET), ISSN 0976 –6340(Print), ISSN 0976 – 6359(Online) Volume 4, Issue 2, March - April (2013) © IAEME3.1 Illustration of Web Based Manufacturing The figure 2 illustrates the web based manufacturing where the component can bebuild anywhere in the world by using the internet facilities and also with available rapidprototyping machine for fabrication. The figure 3 illustrates the architecture of web basedmanufacturing of prototypes through rapid prototyping [9]. Prototype Figure 2 Manufacturing through Internet web based Technique Figure 3: Over all architecture - web based processing of prototypes through RP [9] 36
  6. 6. International Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Technology (IJMET), ISSN 0976 –6340(Print), ISSN 0976 – 6359(Online) Volume 4, Issue 2, March - April (2013) © IAEME4. FABRICATION OF STEREOLITHOGRAPHY PROTOTYPES FOR MECHANICALCHARACTERIZATION The mechanical properties of stereolithography (Photopolymer Parts) models can generally beinfluenced by not only the material characteristics, but also the method of manufacturing. Since thestereolithography process relies on the layer manufacturing concept as well as involves in the post-curing process, it is possible for stereolithography model to exhibit the directional dependencemechanical properties. The objectives of the present work focused on the influence of buildparameters such as Layer thickness, orientations, hatch space and the influence of ultraviolet post-curing period to mechanical properties which are the most significant to the strength ofstereolithography product. The figure 4 – 6 illustrates the Tensile (D638-03), Impact (D 256-04) andFlexural (D790) test specimen according to ASTM Standards with the stereolithography prototypeswhich are used for mechanical characterization. Figure 4: Tensile Test Specimen & SLA prototypes of Tensile test specimen Figure 5: Impact Test Specimen & SLA prototypes of Impact test specimen Figure 5: Flexural Test Specimen & SLA prototypes of Flexural test specimen 37
  7. 7. International Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Technology (IJMET), ISSN 0976 –6340(Print), ISSN 0976 – 6359(Online) Volume 4, Issue 2, March - April (2013) © IAEME5. CONCLUSIONS Pattern development is the main bottleneck (in terms of time and cost) formanufacturing one-off intricate Prototypes, especially for replacement purposes. This can beovercome by a combination of reverse engineering, RP/RT and web-based technologies asillustrated above. The approach has been demonstrated by taking up a standard test specimenwhich used to characterize the mechanical properties of stereolithography prototypes thetensile, impact and flexural strength of CIBSTOOL SL5530 Resin produced by SLA5000stereolithography machines through web based manufacturing process which drasticallyreduces the lead time.6. REFERENCES[1] Raju, B. S., 2006, “New trends in Rapid product development”, International conferenceon intelligent systems and control ISCO 2006, V.Gunaraj editor, Coimbatore, Tamil nadu, pp.132-138.[2] Krause, F. L., Ciesla, M., Stiel, Ch., and Ulbrich, A., 2000, “Enhanced RP for fasterproduct development processes”, Journal of Rapid prototyping, Vol 6, No2, pp. Page No: 63-69[3] Mueller, B., and Kochen, D., 1999, “Laminated object manufacturing for RP andpatternmaking in foundry industry”, Computers in Industry, no.1, pp.47-53.[4] Wang, W., Conley, J .G, and Stoll, H.W., 1999, “Object Manufacturing Process”, RapidPrototyping Journal, Vol 3, pp: 134-141.[5] Sushila, B., K. Karthik P.Radhakrishnan, 1998, “Rapid Tooling for casting- A case studyon application of Rapid Prototyping processes”, Indian Foundry Journal , Vol 11, PP: 213-216.[6] Francis, E. H. and Tay, 2001, “Distributed rapid prototyping- a framework for Internetprototyping and manufacturing”, Journal of Integrated Manufacturing Systems, Vol 6, pp:409-415.[7] Raju, B.S., 2004, “Studies on application of Rapid prototyping for the generation ofphotoelastic model”, M.Tech-thesis., Div.Mechanical Engineering, Sir M.VIT, Bangalore.[8] Yasser, A., Hosni, Jamal Nayfeh, and Ravindra Sundaram, 1999,“Investment castingusing Stereolithography: Case of Complex objects”, Rapid prototyping Journal , Vol 5, No 1,Page No1-7.[9] Hongbo lan ., “Web based rapid prototyping and manufacturing system: A review”,Computers in Industry, Vol 60 , Issue 9 , Dec 2009, Page 643-656. 38

×