SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 7
Download to read offline
INTERNATIONALComputer VolumeOF COMPUTER ENGINEERING
  International Journal of JOURNAL
  6367(Print), ISSN 0976 – 6375(Online)
                                        Engineering and Technology (IJCET), ISSN 0976-
                                              4, Issue 1, January- February (2013), © IAEME
                             & TECHNOLOGY (IJCET)
ISSN 0976 – 6367(Print)
ISSN 0976 – 6375(Online)
Volume 4, Issue 1, January- February (2013), pp. 211-217
                                                                             IJCET
© IAEME: www.iaeme.com/ijcet.asp
Journal Impact Factor (2012): 3.9580 (Calculated by GISI)                ©IAEME
www.jifactor.com




                jQuery WEBSITES PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS
                  BASED ON LOADING TIME: AN OVERVIEW

                                         Asokan M
                       PG and Research department of Computer Science,
                               Nehru Memorial College, India


  ABSTRACT

         Internet is a more powerful web media. It provides a lot of important and effective
  services to our day-to-day life. Every one is particular about loading time of a web page.
  There are many softwares available to build a website. A website is a collection of Web
  pages, images, videos or other digital assets that is hosted on one or several Web server(s),
  usually accessible via the Internet, cell phone or a LAN. No one likes any slow-loading
  websites. jQuery is an open source JavaScript library that simplifies the interactions
  between an HTML document, or more precisely the Document Object Model, and JavaScript.
  jQuery is used to build faster loading websites.[1] This paper discuss about the loading time
  of jQuery websites on three different popular browsers and the loading time of Flash
  websites on Internet Explorer -10. The results were tabulated and analyzed.

  Keywords: Fully Loaded, jQuery, Load Time, web browser, WebPagetest tool

  I. INTRODUCTION

          Information on the Internet is a collection of documents from all over the world linked
  together by computer networks. In order to access the Internet, one needs a special computer
  software called web browser. A web browser is a special software program /application
  used to retrieve files from remote web servers. All web browsers are application programs
  that are developed to access information on WWW. Browsers differ from each other in more
  than one aspect. The distinguishing areas are: (i)Platform: Linux, Windows, Mac,Unix, etc.
  (ii) Protocols: FTP, SFTP, SAMBA, HTTP, IMAP, etc. (iii)Graphical User Interface (GUI)
  (iv)Layout Engine: Amaya, Gecko, Trident, KHTML, WebKit (v) Mobile Compatibility (vi)
  HTML5 Support (vii) Open Source (viii) Proprietary. Most popular browsers are (a) Google
  Chrome (b) Internet Explorer (c) Mozilla Firefox (d) Safari (e) Opera (f) Netscape Navigator
  (g) Lynx and many more. The website/ web page loading time of ten popular jQuery websites
                                               211
International Journal of Computer Engineering and Technology (IJCET), ISSN 0976-
6367(Print), ISSN 0976 – 6375(Online) Volume 4, Issue 1, January- February (2013), © IAEME

on three different web browsers were obtained using WebPagetest tool. In a similar way the
loading time of ten famous Flash websites have been obtained. Finally the Line charts have
been drawn for these two types of websites.

II. jQuery

        jQuery is a fast and concise JavaScript Library that simplifies HTML document
traversing, event handling, animating, and Ajax interactions for rapid web
development. jQuery is designed to change the way that we write JavaScript.

(a) jQuery ADVANTAGES.

    jQuery has many advantages some of them are listed below:
    (i) Relatively small file size. A compressed version of the library is only around 90 k.
   (ii) jQuery plugins are plenty in number and are constantly updated
   (iii) It is currently tested and optimized for development on modern browsers
    (iv) jQuery Mobile is compatible with most major mobile platforms, such as iOS,
          BlackBerry,Windows Mobile, Symbian and Android . etc...

(b)Historical yearly trends in the usage of client-side programming languages for
websites [2]

       The following table-1 report shows the historical trends in the usage of client-side
languages since January 2011.

          TABLE-1 USAGE STATISTICS OF CLIENT-SIDE LANGUAGES
                      2011       2012          2013       2013
                     1 Jan       1 Jan        1 Jan      18 Jan
            None     11.0%       8.6%         7.4%        7.4%
        JavaScript        88.4%             91.1%              92.4%             92.4%
             Flash        28.5%             25.6%              21.1%             20.8%
        Silverlight        0.3%              0.3%              0.2%              0.2%
              Java         0.1%              0.2%              0.2%              0.2%

  The above table-1 shows there is an increasing tendency in the usage of jQuery(JavaScript
Libraries) . Further it shows the usage of Flash and others were move towards a decreasing
tendency.

III. METHODOLOGY

       Website testing is an invincible method which is used to test the speed, usability and
performance of website. A website must be user friendly with good navigation and have cross
browser compatibility. Fast and optimized pages lead to higher visitor engagement, retention,
and conversions. There are many web page analysis tools available. Web Page test is one
among them. This tool provides a waterfall of a given page load performance as well as a


                                              212
International Journal of Computer Engineering and Technology (IJCET), ISSN 0976-
6367(Print), ISSN 0976 – 6375(Online) Volume 4, Issue 1, January- February (2013), © IAEME

comparison against an optimization checklist. Most famous jQuery website have been tested
using Web Page test tool for the browsers IE10,Chrome and Firefox. The data were tabulated.
Three line charts have been drawn to visualize the page loading time in seconds Vs bytes
loaded in KB’s of different websites. A similar test have been conducted for most popular
Flash based websites and the results were included.

IV. jQuery WEBSITES WEBPAGE LOAD TEST

        There are two ways available to test the website performance. One way is download
the relevant software and conduct the test in our system, another way is conduct the test
through online. Ten online tests were conducted using WebPagetest tool. WebPage test
Provide options for (i) Enter The Page URL (ii) Select a Location (iii) Select a Browser.
After entering the correct information the test result will be displayed within few minutes.
One such sample result for one of the popular jQuery website is shown in Fig-1, remaining
test results for some other popular jQuery websites have been recorded.

(a)Fully Loaded:
The metrics grouped together under the Fully Loaded heading are the metrics collected up
until there was 2 seconds of no network activity after Document Complete. This will usually
include any activity that is triggered by javascript after the main page loads.
(b) Load Time:
The Load Time is the time from when the user started navigating to the page until the
Document Complete event (usually when all of the page content has loaded).

For this web performance test, fully loaded time and fully loaded bytes in KB of First view
alone considered and are shown in table-2.



                            Web Page Performance Test for
                                   www.msn.com
  From: Dulles,VA IE10                     FIOS                   1/17/2013 10:10:13 AM

          Document Complete                                    Fully Loaded

                  First   Start                          Bytes                       Bytes
Load Time                        Time        Requests          Time      Requests
                  Byte    Render                         In                          In

First                                                    181                         890
         1.001s 0.311s 0.841s       1.001s 19                     1.672s 99
View                                                     KB                          KB

Repeat                                                   42                          44
       0.971s 0.327s 0.654s         0.971s 8                      1.257s 12
View                                                     KB                          KB

                  Fig-1 Web Page Performance Test using Webpage Test Tool



                                            213
International Journal of Computer Engineering and Technology (IJCET), ISSN 0976-
6367(Print), ISSN 0976 – 6375(Online) Volume 4, Issue 1, January- February (2013), © IAEME


   TABLE-2                FIRST VIEW- FULLY LOADED TIME IN SEC AND BYTES IN KB

                                           IE10-                Chrome-              FireFox-
Website                          IE10      KB          chrome   KB      Firefox      KB
msn.com                          1.672     890         4.74     696      4.236       683
Twitter.com
                                 2.413     421         1.743    0        1.388       389
Amazon.com
                                 3.445     1,512       4.67     1,537    2.547       1,653
Microsoft.com
                                 2.878     935         2.135    944      2.843       944
Bondmedia.co.uk
                                 21.583    3041        6.729    2967     7.106       2875
Huffingtonpost.com
                                 10.754    2780        9.392    2646     4.545       2663
Tumbir.com
                                 5.986     99          2.142    96       2.399       96
Answer.com
                                 1.066     98          0.974    98       1.04        98
Pinterest.com
                                 3.945     2012        2.435    1991     2.12        2003
Ask.com                          3.534     865         2.253    565      2.22        825

A chart is a graphic representation of data used to deliver a message. A line chart plots points
and then connects them with a line. A comparison between Loading time in seconds and
bytes loaded in KB has been found using MS Excel for the browsers IE 10 , Google
Chrome and FireFox and are shown in Fig-2,Fig-3 and Fig-4 respectively.


                  3500                                                          25
                  3000
                                                                                20
                  2500
    Bytes in KB




                  2000                                                          15
                  1500                                                          10
                  1000
                                                                                5
                   500
                                                                                          IE10-KB
                     0                                                          0
                                                                                          IE10




                                                 Websites



                         Fig-2 IE 10 Loading Time in Seconds Vs Bytes Loaded in KB



                                                      214
International Journal of Computer Engineering and Technology (IJCET), ISSN 0976-
6367(Print), ISSN 0976 – 6375(Online) Volume 4, Issue 1, January- February (2013), © IAEME



                         3500                                                     10
                         3000                                                     9
                                                                                  8
   Bytes in KB


                         2500                                                     7
                         2000                                                     6
                                                                                  5
                         1500                                                     4
                         1000                                                     3
                                                                                  2
                          500                                                     1
                            0                                                     0           Chrome-KB
                                                                                              Chrome




                                                    Websites


                          Fig-3 Google Chrome Loading Time in Seconds Vs Bytes Loaded in KB



                         3500                                                          8
                         3000                                                          7
                         2500                                                          6
           Bytes in KB




                                                                                       5
                         2000
                                                                                       4
                         1500                                                          3
                         1000                                                          2
                          500                                                          1      FireFox-KB
                            0                                                          0
                                                                                              Firefox




                                                      Websites


                                Fig-4 Firefox Loading Time in Seconds Vs Bytes Loaded in KB

From the above table and line charts we find that (i) IE 10 takes a maximum of 21.583
seconds to load 3041 bytes (ii)Google chrome takes a maximum of 9.392 secondss to load
2646 bytes (iii) Firefox takes a maximum of 7.106 seconds to load 2875 bytes.The total
time taken by each browser to load these ten websites , the total amount of KB’s loaded by
each browsers has been calculated. The number of bytes loaded per second by each of these
browsers are IE10 – 220.912 bytes/sec,Chrome-310.106 bytes/sec and Firefox-401.688
bytes/sec. It is evident from above discussion ,table-2 and Fig-2 - Fig-4 FireFox loads
faster, places chrome at the second place and IE-10 at third place.


                                                               215
International Journal of Computer Engineering and Technology (IJCET), ISSN 0976-
6367(Print), ISSN 0976 – 6375(Online) Volume 4, Issue 1, January- February (2013), © IAEME

V FLASH WEBSITES WEBPAGE LOAD TEST
         Using WebPagetest tool another set of online tests were conducted for Ten other
popular Flash based websites. The tests has been conducted with the browser IE-10. The
fully loaded time of First view have been recorded and are shown in Table-3.

TABLE-3 IE-10 FIRST VIEW- FULLY LOADED TIME IN SEC AND BYTES IN KB
                                          Website             Time      KB
                           mercedes-benz.com                     6.127     2,960
                           skodayeti.pl/en                      69.472   20,982
                           theoleg.com                           2.151     3,473
                           theprofiler.be                        9.289     1,366
                           kasulo.ws                             6.981     2,465
                           2advanced.com                           8.65    4,137
                           the951.com                            5.571     1,396
                           morganstanley.com                     3.735     1,168
                           sciencemuseum.org.uk                  3.289     1,125
                           testsoldatsjoman.forsvarsmakten.se    5.394     1,065


                  25,000                                                      80
                                                                              70
                  20,000                                                      60
    Bytes in KB




                  15,000                                                      50
                                                                              40
                  10,000                                                      30
                   5,000                                                      20
                                                                              10
                      0                                                       0
                                                                                   Bytes
                                                                                   Time




                                              Flash Websites



        Fig-5 Flash Websites- IE 10 Loading Time in Seconds Vs Bytes Loaded in KB

From the above Table-3 and line chart Fig-5 we find that IE 10 takes a maximum of 69.472
seconds to load 20, 98 bytes. The number of bytes loaded per second by the browsers IE10
has been found and was – 332.648 bytes/sec. The websites involved in our test are not “Flash
only “websites. There are certain disadvantages related to use the of Flash only websites.
They are (i) Loading time. Flash content takes longer than usual to load compared to regular
images and text. The heavier your Flash content is, the longer it will take to load.


                                                     216
International Journal of Computer Engineering and Technology (IJCET), ISSN 0976-
6367(Print), ISSN 0976 – 6375(Online) Volume 4, Issue 1, January- February (2013), © IAEME

(ii) Website Traffic. A website having Flash content would not be indexed by most search
engines. This means Flash website won’t be able to rank good in search engines.
Consequently, there will be less traffic coming to such sites. There are some other
disadvantages are also exists. From table-1 we observe that there is a decreasing tendency
towards the usage of Flash based and other types of (non jQuery based) websites.

VI. CONCLUSION

        The websites loading time for ten different websites on three popular browsers have
been tested and the results were analyzed using tables and line charts. The same test has been
conducted for ten other popular Flash based website. These tests were conducted using the IE
10 browser. The disadvantages of Flash only websites have been discussed. Present trends of
jQuery says, “it is the winner” and our findings favour the same. And it is time to include the
“write less do more jQuery “in our curriculum.

REFERENCES

   1. jQuery Community Experts, jQuery Cookbook (O’Reilly Media, Inc., 1005
      Gravenstein Highway North, Sebastopol, CA 95472)
   2. http://w3techs.com/technologies/overview/client_side_language/all
   3. http://www.webpagetest.org/
   4. www.upsdell.com/BrowserNews/
   5. JavaScript & jQuery: The Missing Manual, Copyright © 2012 David Sawyer
      McFarland David Sawyer McFarland.
   6. Ryan Benedetti and Ronan Cranley, Head First jQuery ( Copyright © 2011 O’Reilly
      Media, Inc., 1005 Gravenstein Highway North, Sebastopol, CA 95472)
   7. L. Chandra Sekaran and Dr. S. Balasubramanian, “Website Based Patent Information
      Searching Mechanism” International journal of Computer Engineering & Technology
      (IJCET), Volume 1, Issue 2, 2010, pp. 180 - 191, Published by IAEME.
   8. Ms. A. Suganthy, G.S.Sumithra, J.Hindusha, A.Gayathri and S.Girija, “Semantic Web
      Services And Its Challenges” International journal of Computer Engineering &
      Technology (IJCET), Volume 1, Issue 2, 2010, pp. 26 - 37, Published by IAEME.




                                             217

More Related Content

Similar to J query websites performance analysis based on loading time an overview

Android vs i os – an analysis
Android vs  i os – an analysisAndroid vs  i os – an analysis
Android vs i os – an analysisIAEME Publication
 
Techniques to Control Memory Hogging by Web Browsers: An in-Depth Review
Techniques to Control Memory Hogging by Web Browsers: An in-Depth ReviewTechniques to Control Memory Hogging by Web Browsers: An in-Depth Review
Techniques to Control Memory Hogging by Web Browsers: An in-Depth ReviewEditor IJCATR
 
Cvcc performance tuning
Cvcc performance tuningCvcc performance tuning
Cvcc performance tuningJohn McCaffrey
 
Single page applications
Single page applicationsSingle page applications
Single page applicationsDiego Cardozo
 
DockerCon SF 2015: Ben Golub's Keynote Day 1
DockerCon SF 2015: Ben Golub's Keynote Day 1DockerCon SF 2015: Ben Golub's Keynote Day 1
DockerCon SF 2015: Ben Golub's Keynote Day 1Docker, Inc.
 
10 Jahre Webentwicklung - am Beispiel des Frameworks qooxdoo
10 Jahre Webentwicklung - am Beispiel des Frameworks qooxdoo10 Jahre Webentwicklung - am Beispiel des Frameworks qooxdoo
10 Jahre Webentwicklung - am Beispiel des Frameworks qooxdooMartin Wittemann
 
FRONTEND DEVELOPMENT WITH REACT.JS
FRONTEND DEVELOPMENT WITH REACT.JSFRONTEND DEVELOPMENT WITH REACT.JS
FRONTEND DEVELOPMENT WITH REACT.JSIRJET Journal
 
Performance on the Yahoo! Homepage
Performance on the Yahoo! HomepagePerformance on the Yahoo! Homepage
Performance on the Yahoo! HomepageNicholas Zakas
 
Building performance into the new yahoo homepage presentation
Building performance into the new yahoo  homepage presentationBuilding performance into the new yahoo  homepage presentation
Building performance into the new yahoo homepage presentationmasudakram
 
Browser core red bus presentation
Browser core red bus presentation Browser core red bus presentation
Browser core red bus presentation redBus India
 
Web Crawler For Mining Web Data
Web Crawler For Mining Web DataWeb Crawler For Mining Web Data
Web Crawler For Mining Web DataIRJET Journal
 
IRJET - Review on Search Engine Optimization
IRJET - Review on Search Engine OptimizationIRJET - Review on Search Engine Optimization
IRJET - Review on Search Engine OptimizationIRJET Journal
 
SPEEDING UP THE WEB CRAWLING PROCESS ON A MULTI-CORE PROCESSOR USING VIRTUALI...
SPEEDING UP THE WEB CRAWLING PROCESS ON A MULTI-CORE PROCESSOR USING VIRTUALI...SPEEDING UP THE WEB CRAWLING PROCESS ON A MULTI-CORE PROCESSOR USING VIRTUALI...
SPEEDING UP THE WEB CRAWLING PROCESS ON A MULTI-CORE PROCESSOR USING VIRTUALI...ijwscjournal
 
WordPress Theme Performance - WP Vienna meetup 8.6.2016
WordPress Theme Performance - WP Vienna meetup 8.6.2016WordPress Theme Performance - WP Vienna meetup 8.6.2016
WordPress Theme Performance - WP Vienna meetup 8.6.2016jancbeck
 
Best practices to increase the performance of web-based applications
Best practices to increase the performance of web-based applicationsBest practices to increase the performance of web-based applications
Best practices to increase the performance of web-based applicationsMouhamad Kawas
 
Faster Frontends
Faster FrontendsFaster Frontends
Faster FrontendsAndy Davies
 
Measuring web performance
Measuring web performanceMeasuring web performance
Measuring web performancePatrick Meenan
 

Similar to J query websites performance analysis based on loading time an overview (20)

Android vs i os – an analysis
Android vs  i os – an analysisAndroid vs  i os – an analysis
Android vs i os – an analysis
 
Techniques to Control Memory Hogging by Web Browsers: An in-Depth Review
Techniques to Control Memory Hogging by Web Browsers: An in-Depth ReviewTechniques to Control Memory Hogging by Web Browsers: An in-Depth Review
Techniques to Control Memory Hogging by Web Browsers: An in-Depth Review
 
Transforming the web into a real application platform
Transforming the web into a real application platformTransforming the web into a real application platform
Transforming the web into a real application platform
 
Cvcc performance tuning
Cvcc performance tuningCvcc performance tuning
Cvcc performance tuning
 
Single page applications
Single page applicationsSingle page applications
Single page applications
 
DockerCon SF 2015: Ben Golub's Keynote Day 1
DockerCon SF 2015: Ben Golub's Keynote Day 1DockerCon SF 2015: Ben Golub's Keynote Day 1
DockerCon SF 2015: Ben Golub's Keynote Day 1
 
10 Jahre Webentwicklung - am Beispiel des Frameworks qooxdoo
10 Jahre Webentwicklung - am Beispiel des Frameworks qooxdoo10 Jahre Webentwicklung - am Beispiel des Frameworks qooxdoo
10 Jahre Webentwicklung - am Beispiel des Frameworks qooxdoo
 
FRONTEND DEVELOPMENT WITH REACT.JS
FRONTEND DEVELOPMENT WITH REACT.JSFRONTEND DEVELOPMENT WITH REACT.JS
FRONTEND DEVELOPMENT WITH REACT.JS
 
Performance on the Yahoo! Homepage
Performance on the Yahoo! HomepagePerformance on the Yahoo! Homepage
Performance on the Yahoo! Homepage
 
Building performance into the new yahoo homepage presentation
Building performance into the new yahoo  homepage presentationBuilding performance into the new yahoo  homepage presentation
Building performance into the new yahoo homepage presentation
 
Browser core red bus presentation
Browser core red bus presentation Browser core red bus presentation
Browser core red bus presentation
 
Jquery
JqueryJquery
Jquery
 
Web Crawler For Mining Web Data
Web Crawler For Mining Web DataWeb Crawler For Mining Web Data
Web Crawler For Mining Web Data
 
IRJET - Review on Search Engine Optimization
IRJET - Review on Search Engine OptimizationIRJET - Review on Search Engine Optimization
IRJET - Review on Search Engine Optimization
 
Web apps of the future
Web apps of the futureWeb apps of the future
Web apps of the future
 
SPEEDING UP THE WEB CRAWLING PROCESS ON A MULTI-CORE PROCESSOR USING VIRTUALI...
SPEEDING UP THE WEB CRAWLING PROCESS ON A MULTI-CORE PROCESSOR USING VIRTUALI...SPEEDING UP THE WEB CRAWLING PROCESS ON A MULTI-CORE PROCESSOR USING VIRTUALI...
SPEEDING UP THE WEB CRAWLING PROCESS ON A MULTI-CORE PROCESSOR USING VIRTUALI...
 
WordPress Theme Performance - WP Vienna meetup 8.6.2016
WordPress Theme Performance - WP Vienna meetup 8.6.2016WordPress Theme Performance - WP Vienna meetup 8.6.2016
WordPress Theme Performance - WP Vienna meetup 8.6.2016
 
Best practices to increase the performance of web-based applications
Best practices to increase the performance of web-based applicationsBest practices to increase the performance of web-based applications
Best practices to increase the performance of web-based applications
 
Faster Frontends
Faster FrontendsFaster Frontends
Faster Frontends
 
Measuring web performance
Measuring web performanceMeasuring web performance
Measuring web performance
 

More from IAEME Publication

IAEME_Publication_Call_for_Paper_September_2022.pdf
IAEME_Publication_Call_for_Paper_September_2022.pdfIAEME_Publication_Call_for_Paper_September_2022.pdf
IAEME_Publication_Call_for_Paper_September_2022.pdfIAEME Publication
 
MODELING AND ANALYSIS OF SURFACE ROUGHNESS AND WHITE LATER THICKNESS IN WIRE-...
MODELING AND ANALYSIS OF SURFACE ROUGHNESS AND WHITE LATER THICKNESS IN WIRE-...MODELING AND ANALYSIS OF SURFACE ROUGHNESS AND WHITE LATER THICKNESS IN WIRE-...
MODELING AND ANALYSIS OF SURFACE ROUGHNESS AND WHITE LATER THICKNESS IN WIRE-...IAEME Publication
 
A STUDY ON THE REASONS FOR TRANSGENDER TO BECOME ENTREPRENEURS
A STUDY ON THE REASONS FOR TRANSGENDER TO BECOME ENTREPRENEURSA STUDY ON THE REASONS FOR TRANSGENDER TO BECOME ENTREPRENEURS
A STUDY ON THE REASONS FOR TRANSGENDER TO BECOME ENTREPRENEURSIAEME Publication
 
BROAD UNEXPOSED SKILLS OF TRANSGENDER ENTREPRENEURS
BROAD UNEXPOSED SKILLS OF TRANSGENDER ENTREPRENEURSBROAD UNEXPOSED SKILLS OF TRANSGENDER ENTREPRENEURS
BROAD UNEXPOSED SKILLS OF TRANSGENDER ENTREPRENEURSIAEME Publication
 
DETERMINANTS AFFECTING THE USER'S INTENTION TO USE MOBILE BANKING APPLICATIONS
DETERMINANTS AFFECTING THE USER'S INTENTION TO USE MOBILE BANKING APPLICATIONSDETERMINANTS AFFECTING THE USER'S INTENTION TO USE MOBILE BANKING APPLICATIONS
DETERMINANTS AFFECTING THE USER'S INTENTION TO USE MOBILE BANKING APPLICATIONSIAEME Publication
 
ANALYSE THE USER PREDILECTION ON GPAY AND PHONEPE FOR DIGITAL TRANSACTIONS
ANALYSE THE USER PREDILECTION ON GPAY AND PHONEPE FOR DIGITAL TRANSACTIONSANALYSE THE USER PREDILECTION ON GPAY AND PHONEPE FOR DIGITAL TRANSACTIONS
ANALYSE THE USER PREDILECTION ON GPAY AND PHONEPE FOR DIGITAL TRANSACTIONSIAEME Publication
 
VOICE BASED ATM FOR VISUALLY IMPAIRED USING ARDUINO
VOICE BASED ATM FOR VISUALLY IMPAIRED USING ARDUINOVOICE BASED ATM FOR VISUALLY IMPAIRED USING ARDUINO
VOICE BASED ATM FOR VISUALLY IMPAIRED USING ARDUINOIAEME Publication
 
IMPACT OF EMOTIONAL INTELLIGENCE ON HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT PRACTICES AMONG...
IMPACT OF EMOTIONAL INTELLIGENCE ON HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT PRACTICES AMONG...IMPACT OF EMOTIONAL INTELLIGENCE ON HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT PRACTICES AMONG...
IMPACT OF EMOTIONAL INTELLIGENCE ON HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT PRACTICES AMONG...IAEME Publication
 
VISUALISING AGING PARENTS & THEIR CLOSE CARERS LIFE JOURNEY IN AGING ECONOMY
VISUALISING AGING PARENTS & THEIR CLOSE CARERS LIFE JOURNEY IN AGING ECONOMYVISUALISING AGING PARENTS & THEIR CLOSE CARERS LIFE JOURNEY IN AGING ECONOMY
VISUALISING AGING PARENTS & THEIR CLOSE CARERS LIFE JOURNEY IN AGING ECONOMYIAEME Publication
 
A STUDY ON THE IMPACT OF ORGANIZATIONAL CULTURE ON THE EFFECTIVENESS OF PERFO...
A STUDY ON THE IMPACT OF ORGANIZATIONAL CULTURE ON THE EFFECTIVENESS OF PERFO...A STUDY ON THE IMPACT OF ORGANIZATIONAL CULTURE ON THE EFFECTIVENESS OF PERFO...
A STUDY ON THE IMPACT OF ORGANIZATIONAL CULTURE ON THE EFFECTIVENESS OF PERFO...IAEME Publication
 
GANDHI ON NON-VIOLENT POLICE
GANDHI ON NON-VIOLENT POLICEGANDHI ON NON-VIOLENT POLICE
GANDHI ON NON-VIOLENT POLICEIAEME Publication
 
A STUDY ON TALENT MANAGEMENT AND ITS IMPACT ON EMPLOYEE RETENTION IN SELECTED...
A STUDY ON TALENT MANAGEMENT AND ITS IMPACT ON EMPLOYEE RETENTION IN SELECTED...A STUDY ON TALENT MANAGEMENT AND ITS IMPACT ON EMPLOYEE RETENTION IN SELECTED...
A STUDY ON TALENT MANAGEMENT AND ITS IMPACT ON EMPLOYEE RETENTION IN SELECTED...IAEME Publication
 
ATTRITION IN THE IT INDUSTRY DURING COVID-19 PANDEMIC: LINKING EMOTIONAL INTE...
ATTRITION IN THE IT INDUSTRY DURING COVID-19 PANDEMIC: LINKING EMOTIONAL INTE...ATTRITION IN THE IT INDUSTRY DURING COVID-19 PANDEMIC: LINKING EMOTIONAL INTE...
ATTRITION IN THE IT INDUSTRY DURING COVID-19 PANDEMIC: LINKING EMOTIONAL INTE...IAEME Publication
 
INFLUENCE OF TALENT MANAGEMENT PRACTICES ON ORGANIZATIONAL PERFORMANCE A STUD...
INFLUENCE OF TALENT MANAGEMENT PRACTICES ON ORGANIZATIONAL PERFORMANCE A STUD...INFLUENCE OF TALENT MANAGEMENT PRACTICES ON ORGANIZATIONAL PERFORMANCE A STUD...
INFLUENCE OF TALENT MANAGEMENT PRACTICES ON ORGANIZATIONAL PERFORMANCE A STUD...IAEME Publication
 
A STUDY OF VARIOUS TYPES OF LOANS OF SELECTED PUBLIC AND PRIVATE SECTOR BANKS...
A STUDY OF VARIOUS TYPES OF LOANS OF SELECTED PUBLIC AND PRIVATE SECTOR BANKS...A STUDY OF VARIOUS TYPES OF LOANS OF SELECTED PUBLIC AND PRIVATE SECTOR BANKS...
A STUDY OF VARIOUS TYPES OF LOANS OF SELECTED PUBLIC AND PRIVATE SECTOR BANKS...IAEME Publication
 
EXPERIMENTAL STUDY OF MECHANICAL AND TRIBOLOGICAL RELATION OF NYLON/BaSO4 POL...
EXPERIMENTAL STUDY OF MECHANICAL AND TRIBOLOGICAL RELATION OF NYLON/BaSO4 POL...EXPERIMENTAL STUDY OF MECHANICAL AND TRIBOLOGICAL RELATION OF NYLON/BaSO4 POL...
EXPERIMENTAL STUDY OF MECHANICAL AND TRIBOLOGICAL RELATION OF NYLON/BaSO4 POL...IAEME Publication
 
ROLE OF SOCIAL ENTREPRENEURSHIP IN RURAL DEVELOPMENT OF INDIA - PROBLEMS AND ...
ROLE OF SOCIAL ENTREPRENEURSHIP IN RURAL DEVELOPMENT OF INDIA - PROBLEMS AND ...ROLE OF SOCIAL ENTREPRENEURSHIP IN RURAL DEVELOPMENT OF INDIA - PROBLEMS AND ...
ROLE OF SOCIAL ENTREPRENEURSHIP IN RURAL DEVELOPMENT OF INDIA - PROBLEMS AND ...IAEME Publication
 
OPTIMAL RECONFIGURATION OF POWER DISTRIBUTION RADIAL NETWORK USING HYBRID MET...
OPTIMAL RECONFIGURATION OF POWER DISTRIBUTION RADIAL NETWORK USING HYBRID MET...OPTIMAL RECONFIGURATION OF POWER DISTRIBUTION RADIAL NETWORK USING HYBRID MET...
OPTIMAL RECONFIGURATION OF POWER DISTRIBUTION RADIAL NETWORK USING HYBRID MET...IAEME Publication
 
APPLICATION OF FRUGAL APPROACH FOR PRODUCTIVITY IMPROVEMENT - A CASE STUDY OF...
APPLICATION OF FRUGAL APPROACH FOR PRODUCTIVITY IMPROVEMENT - A CASE STUDY OF...APPLICATION OF FRUGAL APPROACH FOR PRODUCTIVITY IMPROVEMENT - A CASE STUDY OF...
APPLICATION OF FRUGAL APPROACH FOR PRODUCTIVITY IMPROVEMENT - A CASE STUDY OF...IAEME Publication
 
A MULTIPLE – CHANNEL QUEUING MODELS ON FUZZY ENVIRONMENT
A MULTIPLE – CHANNEL QUEUING MODELS ON FUZZY ENVIRONMENTA MULTIPLE – CHANNEL QUEUING MODELS ON FUZZY ENVIRONMENT
A MULTIPLE – CHANNEL QUEUING MODELS ON FUZZY ENVIRONMENTIAEME Publication
 

More from IAEME Publication (20)

IAEME_Publication_Call_for_Paper_September_2022.pdf
IAEME_Publication_Call_for_Paper_September_2022.pdfIAEME_Publication_Call_for_Paper_September_2022.pdf
IAEME_Publication_Call_for_Paper_September_2022.pdf
 
MODELING AND ANALYSIS OF SURFACE ROUGHNESS AND WHITE LATER THICKNESS IN WIRE-...
MODELING AND ANALYSIS OF SURFACE ROUGHNESS AND WHITE LATER THICKNESS IN WIRE-...MODELING AND ANALYSIS OF SURFACE ROUGHNESS AND WHITE LATER THICKNESS IN WIRE-...
MODELING AND ANALYSIS OF SURFACE ROUGHNESS AND WHITE LATER THICKNESS IN WIRE-...
 
A STUDY ON THE REASONS FOR TRANSGENDER TO BECOME ENTREPRENEURS
A STUDY ON THE REASONS FOR TRANSGENDER TO BECOME ENTREPRENEURSA STUDY ON THE REASONS FOR TRANSGENDER TO BECOME ENTREPRENEURS
A STUDY ON THE REASONS FOR TRANSGENDER TO BECOME ENTREPRENEURS
 
BROAD UNEXPOSED SKILLS OF TRANSGENDER ENTREPRENEURS
BROAD UNEXPOSED SKILLS OF TRANSGENDER ENTREPRENEURSBROAD UNEXPOSED SKILLS OF TRANSGENDER ENTREPRENEURS
BROAD UNEXPOSED SKILLS OF TRANSGENDER ENTREPRENEURS
 
DETERMINANTS AFFECTING THE USER'S INTENTION TO USE MOBILE BANKING APPLICATIONS
DETERMINANTS AFFECTING THE USER'S INTENTION TO USE MOBILE BANKING APPLICATIONSDETERMINANTS AFFECTING THE USER'S INTENTION TO USE MOBILE BANKING APPLICATIONS
DETERMINANTS AFFECTING THE USER'S INTENTION TO USE MOBILE BANKING APPLICATIONS
 
ANALYSE THE USER PREDILECTION ON GPAY AND PHONEPE FOR DIGITAL TRANSACTIONS
ANALYSE THE USER PREDILECTION ON GPAY AND PHONEPE FOR DIGITAL TRANSACTIONSANALYSE THE USER PREDILECTION ON GPAY AND PHONEPE FOR DIGITAL TRANSACTIONS
ANALYSE THE USER PREDILECTION ON GPAY AND PHONEPE FOR DIGITAL TRANSACTIONS
 
VOICE BASED ATM FOR VISUALLY IMPAIRED USING ARDUINO
VOICE BASED ATM FOR VISUALLY IMPAIRED USING ARDUINOVOICE BASED ATM FOR VISUALLY IMPAIRED USING ARDUINO
VOICE BASED ATM FOR VISUALLY IMPAIRED USING ARDUINO
 
IMPACT OF EMOTIONAL INTELLIGENCE ON HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT PRACTICES AMONG...
IMPACT OF EMOTIONAL INTELLIGENCE ON HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT PRACTICES AMONG...IMPACT OF EMOTIONAL INTELLIGENCE ON HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT PRACTICES AMONG...
IMPACT OF EMOTIONAL INTELLIGENCE ON HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT PRACTICES AMONG...
 
VISUALISING AGING PARENTS & THEIR CLOSE CARERS LIFE JOURNEY IN AGING ECONOMY
VISUALISING AGING PARENTS & THEIR CLOSE CARERS LIFE JOURNEY IN AGING ECONOMYVISUALISING AGING PARENTS & THEIR CLOSE CARERS LIFE JOURNEY IN AGING ECONOMY
VISUALISING AGING PARENTS & THEIR CLOSE CARERS LIFE JOURNEY IN AGING ECONOMY
 
A STUDY ON THE IMPACT OF ORGANIZATIONAL CULTURE ON THE EFFECTIVENESS OF PERFO...
A STUDY ON THE IMPACT OF ORGANIZATIONAL CULTURE ON THE EFFECTIVENESS OF PERFO...A STUDY ON THE IMPACT OF ORGANIZATIONAL CULTURE ON THE EFFECTIVENESS OF PERFO...
A STUDY ON THE IMPACT OF ORGANIZATIONAL CULTURE ON THE EFFECTIVENESS OF PERFO...
 
GANDHI ON NON-VIOLENT POLICE
GANDHI ON NON-VIOLENT POLICEGANDHI ON NON-VIOLENT POLICE
GANDHI ON NON-VIOLENT POLICE
 
A STUDY ON TALENT MANAGEMENT AND ITS IMPACT ON EMPLOYEE RETENTION IN SELECTED...
A STUDY ON TALENT MANAGEMENT AND ITS IMPACT ON EMPLOYEE RETENTION IN SELECTED...A STUDY ON TALENT MANAGEMENT AND ITS IMPACT ON EMPLOYEE RETENTION IN SELECTED...
A STUDY ON TALENT MANAGEMENT AND ITS IMPACT ON EMPLOYEE RETENTION IN SELECTED...
 
ATTRITION IN THE IT INDUSTRY DURING COVID-19 PANDEMIC: LINKING EMOTIONAL INTE...
ATTRITION IN THE IT INDUSTRY DURING COVID-19 PANDEMIC: LINKING EMOTIONAL INTE...ATTRITION IN THE IT INDUSTRY DURING COVID-19 PANDEMIC: LINKING EMOTIONAL INTE...
ATTRITION IN THE IT INDUSTRY DURING COVID-19 PANDEMIC: LINKING EMOTIONAL INTE...
 
INFLUENCE OF TALENT MANAGEMENT PRACTICES ON ORGANIZATIONAL PERFORMANCE A STUD...
INFLUENCE OF TALENT MANAGEMENT PRACTICES ON ORGANIZATIONAL PERFORMANCE A STUD...INFLUENCE OF TALENT MANAGEMENT PRACTICES ON ORGANIZATIONAL PERFORMANCE A STUD...
INFLUENCE OF TALENT MANAGEMENT PRACTICES ON ORGANIZATIONAL PERFORMANCE A STUD...
 
A STUDY OF VARIOUS TYPES OF LOANS OF SELECTED PUBLIC AND PRIVATE SECTOR BANKS...
A STUDY OF VARIOUS TYPES OF LOANS OF SELECTED PUBLIC AND PRIVATE SECTOR BANKS...A STUDY OF VARIOUS TYPES OF LOANS OF SELECTED PUBLIC AND PRIVATE SECTOR BANKS...
A STUDY OF VARIOUS TYPES OF LOANS OF SELECTED PUBLIC AND PRIVATE SECTOR BANKS...
 
EXPERIMENTAL STUDY OF MECHANICAL AND TRIBOLOGICAL RELATION OF NYLON/BaSO4 POL...
EXPERIMENTAL STUDY OF MECHANICAL AND TRIBOLOGICAL RELATION OF NYLON/BaSO4 POL...EXPERIMENTAL STUDY OF MECHANICAL AND TRIBOLOGICAL RELATION OF NYLON/BaSO4 POL...
EXPERIMENTAL STUDY OF MECHANICAL AND TRIBOLOGICAL RELATION OF NYLON/BaSO4 POL...
 
ROLE OF SOCIAL ENTREPRENEURSHIP IN RURAL DEVELOPMENT OF INDIA - PROBLEMS AND ...
ROLE OF SOCIAL ENTREPRENEURSHIP IN RURAL DEVELOPMENT OF INDIA - PROBLEMS AND ...ROLE OF SOCIAL ENTREPRENEURSHIP IN RURAL DEVELOPMENT OF INDIA - PROBLEMS AND ...
ROLE OF SOCIAL ENTREPRENEURSHIP IN RURAL DEVELOPMENT OF INDIA - PROBLEMS AND ...
 
OPTIMAL RECONFIGURATION OF POWER DISTRIBUTION RADIAL NETWORK USING HYBRID MET...
OPTIMAL RECONFIGURATION OF POWER DISTRIBUTION RADIAL NETWORK USING HYBRID MET...OPTIMAL RECONFIGURATION OF POWER DISTRIBUTION RADIAL NETWORK USING HYBRID MET...
OPTIMAL RECONFIGURATION OF POWER DISTRIBUTION RADIAL NETWORK USING HYBRID MET...
 
APPLICATION OF FRUGAL APPROACH FOR PRODUCTIVITY IMPROVEMENT - A CASE STUDY OF...
APPLICATION OF FRUGAL APPROACH FOR PRODUCTIVITY IMPROVEMENT - A CASE STUDY OF...APPLICATION OF FRUGAL APPROACH FOR PRODUCTIVITY IMPROVEMENT - A CASE STUDY OF...
APPLICATION OF FRUGAL APPROACH FOR PRODUCTIVITY IMPROVEMENT - A CASE STUDY OF...
 
A MULTIPLE – CHANNEL QUEUING MODELS ON FUZZY ENVIRONMENT
A MULTIPLE – CHANNEL QUEUING MODELS ON FUZZY ENVIRONMENTA MULTIPLE – CHANNEL QUEUING MODELS ON FUZZY ENVIRONMENT
A MULTIPLE – CHANNEL QUEUING MODELS ON FUZZY ENVIRONMENT
 

J query websites performance analysis based on loading time an overview

  • 1. INTERNATIONALComputer VolumeOF COMPUTER ENGINEERING International Journal of JOURNAL 6367(Print), ISSN 0976 – 6375(Online) Engineering and Technology (IJCET), ISSN 0976- 4, Issue 1, January- February (2013), © IAEME & TECHNOLOGY (IJCET) ISSN 0976 – 6367(Print) ISSN 0976 – 6375(Online) Volume 4, Issue 1, January- February (2013), pp. 211-217 IJCET © IAEME: www.iaeme.com/ijcet.asp Journal Impact Factor (2012): 3.9580 (Calculated by GISI) ©IAEME www.jifactor.com jQuery WEBSITES PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS BASED ON LOADING TIME: AN OVERVIEW Asokan M PG and Research department of Computer Science, Nehru Memorial College, India ABSTRACT Internet is a more powerful web media. It provides a lot of important and effective services to our day-to-day life. Every one is particular about loading time of a web page. There are many softwares available to build a website. A website is a collection of Web pages, images, videos or other digital assets that is hosted on one or several Web server(s), usually accessible via the Internet, cell phone or a LAN. No one likes any slow-loading websites. jQuery is an open source JavaScript library that simplifies the interactions between an HTML document, or more precisely the Document Object Model, and JavaScript. jQuery is used to build faster loading websites.[1] This paper discuss about the loading time of jQuery websites on three different popular browsers and the loading time of Flash websites on Internet Explorer -10. The results were tabulated and analyzed. Keywords: Fully Loaded, jQuery, Load Time, web browser, WebPagetest tool I. INTRODUCTION Information on the Internet is a collection of documents from all over the world linked together by computer networks. In order to access the Internet, one needs a special computer software called web browser. A web browser is a special software program /application used to retrieve files from remote web servers. All web browsers are application programs that are developed to access information on WWW. Browsers differ from each other in more than one aspect. The distinguishing areas are: (i)Platform: Linux, Windows, Mac,Unix, etc. (ii) Protocols: FTP, SFTP, SAMBA, HTTP, IMAP, etc. (iii)Graphical User Interface (GUI) (iv)Layout Engine: Amaya, Gecko, Trident, KHTML, WebKit (v) Mobile Compatibility (vi) HTML5 Support (vii) Open Source (viii) Proprietary. Most popular browsers are (a) Google Chrome (b) Internet Explorer (c) Mozilla Firefox (d) Safari (e) Opera (f) Netscape Navigator (g) Lynx and many more. The website/ web page loading time of ten popular jQuery websites 211
  • 2. International Journal of Computer Engineering and Technology (IJCET), ISSN 0976- 6367(Print), ISSN 0976 – 6375(Online) Volume 4, Issue 1, January- February (2013), © IAEME on three different web browsers were obtained using WebPagetest tool. In a similar way the loading time of ten famous Flash websites have been obtained. Finally the Line charts have been drawn for these two types of websites. II. jQuery jQuery is a fast and concise JavaScript Library that simplifies HTML document traversing, event handling, animating, and Ajax interactions for rapid web development. jQuery is designed to change the way that we write JavaScript. (a) jQuery ADVANTAGES. jQuery has many advantages some of them are listed below: (i) Relatively small file size. A compressed version of the library is only around 90 k. (ii) jQuery plugins are plenty in number and are constantly updated (iii) It is currently tested and optimized for development on modern browsers (iv) jQuery Mobile is compatible with most major mobile platforms, such as iOS, BlackBerry,Windows Mobile, Symbian and Android . etc... (b)Historical yearly trends in the usage of client-side programming languages for websites [2] The following table-1 report shows the historical trends in the usage of client-side languages since January 2011. TABLE-1 USAGE STATISTICS OF CLIENT-SIDE LANGUAGES 2011 2012 2013 2013 1 Jan 1 Jan 1 Jan 18 Jan None 11.0% 8.6% 7.4% 7.4% JavaScript 88.4% 91.1% 92.4% 92.4% Flash 28.5% 25.6% 21.1% 20.8% Silverlight 0.3% 0.3% 0.2% 0.2% Java 0.1% 0.2% 0.2% 0.2% The above table-1 shows there is an increasing tendency in the usage of jQuery(JavaScript Libraries) . Further it shows the usage of Flash and others were move towards a decreasing tendency. III. METHODOLOGY Website testing is an invincible method which is used to test the speed, usability and performance of website. A website must be user friendly with good navigation and have cross browser compatibility. Fast and optimized pages lead to higher visitor engagement, retention, and conversions. There are many web page analysis tools available. Web Page test is one among them. This tool provides a waterfall of a given page load performance as well as a 212
  • 3. International Journal of Computer Engineering and Technology (IJCET), ISSN 0976- 6367(Print), ISSN 0976 – 6375(Online) Volume 4, Issue 1, January- February (2013), © IAEME comparison against an optimization checklist. Most famous jQuery website have been tested using Web Page test tool for the browsers IE10,Chrome and Firefox. The data were tabulated. Three line charts have been drawn to visualize the page loading time in seconds Vs bytes loaded in KB’s of different websites. A similar test have been conducted for most popular Flash based websites and the results were included. IV. jQuery WEBSITES WEBPAGE LOAD TEST There are two ways available to test the website performance. One way is download the relevant software and conduct the test in our system, another way is conduct the test through online. Ten online tests were conducted using WebPagetest tool. WebPage test Provide options for (i) Enter The Page URL (ii) Select a Location (iii) Select a Browser. After entering the correct information the test result will be displayed within few minutes. One such sample result for one of the popular jQuery website is shown in Fig-1, remaining test results for some other popular jQuery websites have been recorded. (a)Fully Loaded: The metrics grouped together under the Fully Loaded heading are the metrics collected up until there was 2 seconds of no network activity after Document Complete. This will usually include any activity that is triggered by javascript after the main page loads. (b) Load Time: The Load Time is the time from when the user started navigating to the page until the Document Complete event (usually when all of the page content has loaded). For this web performance test, fully loaded time and fully loaded bytes in KB of First view alone considered and are shown in table-2. Web Page Performance Test for www.msn.com From: Dulles,VA IE10 FIOS 1/17/2013 10:10:13 AM Document Complete Fully Loaded First Start Bytes Bytes Load Time Time Requests Time Requests Byte Render In In First 181 890 1.001s 0.311s 0.841s 1.001s 19 1.672s 99 View KB KB Repeat 42 44 0.971s 0.327s 0.654s 0.971s 8 1.257s 12 View KB KB Fig-1 Web Page Performance Test using Webpage Test Tool 213
  • 4. International Journal of Computer Engineering and Technology (IJCET), ISSN 0976- 6367(Print), ISSN 0976 – 6375(Online) Volume 4, Issue 1, January- February (2013), © IAEME TABLE-2 FIRST VIEW- FULLY LOADED TIME IN SEC AND BYTES IN KB IE10- Chrome- FireFox- Website IE10 KB chrome KB Firefox KB msn.com 1.672 890 4.74 696 4.236 683 Twitter.com 2.413 421 1.743 0 1.388 389 Amazon.com 3.445 1,512 4.67 1,537 2.547 1,653 Microsoft.com 2.878 935 2.135 944 2.843 944 Bondmedia.co.uk 21.583 3041 6.729 2967 7.106 2875 Huffingtonpost.com 10.754 2780 9.392 2646 4.545 2663 Tumbir.com 5.986 99 2.142 96 2.399 96 Answer.com 1.066 98 0.974 98 1.04 98 Pinterest.com 3.945 2012 2.435 1991 2.12 2003 Ask.com 3.534 865 2.253 565 2.22 825 A chart is a graphic representation of data used to deliver a message. A line chart plots points and then connects them with a line. A comparison between Loading time in seconds and bytes loaded in KB has been found using MS Excel for the browsers IE 10 , Google Chrome and FireFox and are shown in Fig-2,Fig-3 and Fig-4 respectively. 3500 25 3000 20 2500 Bytes in KB 2000 15 1500 10 1000 5 500 IE10-KB 0 0 IE10 Websites Fig-2 IE 10 Loading Time in Seconds Vs Bytes Loaded in KB 214
  • 5. International Journal of Computer Engineering and Technology (IJCET), ISSN 0976- 6367(Print), ISSN 0976 – 6375(Online) Volume 4, Issue 1, January- February (2013), © IAEME 3500 10 3000 9 8 Bytes in KB 2500 7 2000 6 5 1500 4 1000 3 2 500 1 0 0 Chrome-KB Chrome Websites Fig-3 Google Chrome Loading Time in Seconds Vs Bytes Loaded in KB 3500 8 3000 7 2500 6 Bytes in KB 5 2000 4 1500 3 1000 2 500 1 FireFox-KB 0 0 Firefox Websites Fig-4 Firefox Loading Time in Seconds Vs Bytes Loaded in KB From the above table and line charts we find that (i) IE 10 takes a maximum of 21.583 seconds to load 3041 bytes (ii)Google chrome takes a maximum of 9.392 secondss to load 2646 bytes (iii) Firefox takes a maximum of 7.106 seconds to load 2875 bytes.The total time taken by each browser to load these ten websites , the total amount of KB’s loaded by each browsers has been calculated. The number of bytes loaded per second by each of these browsers are IE10 – 220.912 bytes/sec,Chrome-310.106 bytes/sec and Firefox-401.688 bytes/sec. It is evident from above discussion ,table-2 and Fig-2 - Fig-4 FireFox loads faster, places chrome at the second place and IE-10 at third place. 215
  • 6. International Journal of Computer Engineering and Technology (IJCET), ISSN 0976- 6367(Print), ISSN 0976 – 6375(Online) Volume 4, Issue 1, January- February (2013), © IAEME V FLASH WEBSITES WEBPAGE LOAD TEST Using WebPagetest tool another set of online tests were conducted for Ten other popular Flash based websites. The tests has been conducted with the browser IE-10. The fully loaded time of First view have been recorded and are shown in Table-3. TABLE-3 IE-10 FIRST VIEW- FULLY LOADED TIME IN SEC AND BYTES IN KB Website Time KB mercedes-benz.com 6.127 2,960 skodayeti.pl/en 69.472 20,982 theoleg.com 2.151 3,473 theprofiler.be 9.289 1,366 kasulo.ws 6.981 2,465 2advanced.com 8.65 4,137 the951.com 5.571 1,396 morganstanley.com 3.735 1,168 sciencemuseum.org.uk 3.289 1,125 testsoldatsjoman.forsvarsmakten.se 5.394 1,065 25,000 80 70 20,000 60 Bytes in KB 15,000 50 40 10,000 30 5,000 20 10 0 0 Bytes Time Flash Websites Fig-5 Flash Websites- IE 10 Loading Time in Seconds Vs Bytes Loaded in KB From the above Table-3 and line chart Fig-5 we find that IE 10 takes a maximum of 69.472 seconds to load 20, 98 bytes. The number of bytes loaded per second by the browsers IE10 has been found and was – 332.648 bytes/sec. The websites involved in our test are not “Flash only “websites. There are certain disadvantages related to use the of Flash only websites. They are (i) Loading time. Flash content takes longer than usual to load compared to regular images and text. The heavier your Flash content is, the longer it will take to load. 216
  • 7. International Journal of Computer Engineering and Technology (IJCET), ISSN 0976- 6367(Print), ISSN 0976 – 6375(Online) Volume 4, Issue 1, January- February (2013), © IAEME (ii) Website Traffic. A website having Flash content would not be indexed by most search engines. This means Flash website won’t be able to rank good in search engines. Consequently, there will be less traffic coming to such sites. There are some other disadvantages are also exists. From table-1 we observe that there is a decreasing tendency towards the usage of Flash based and other types of (non jQuery based) websites. VI. CONCLUSION The websites loading time for ten different websites on three popular browsers have been tested and the results were analyzed using tables and line charts. The same test has been conducted for ten other popular Flash based website. These tests were conducted using the IE 10 browser. The disadvantages of Flash only websites have been discussed. Present trends of jQuery says, “it is the winner” and our findings favour the same. And it is time to include the “write less do more jQuery “in our curriculum. REFERENCES 1. jQuery Community Experts, jQuery Cookbook (O’Reilly Media, Inc., 1005 Gravenstein Highway North, Sebastopol, CA 95472) 2. http://w3techs.com/technologies/overview/client_side_language/all 3. http://www.webpagetest.org/ 4. www.upsdell.com/BrowserNews/ 5. JavaScript & jQuery: The Missing Manual, Copyright © 2012 David Sawyer McFarland David Sawyer McFarland. 6. Ryan Benedetti and Ronan Cranley, Head First jQuery ( Copyright © 2011 O’Reilly Media, Inc., 1005 Gravenstein Highway North, Sebastopol, CA 95472) 7. L. Chandra Sekaran and Dr. S. Balasubramanian, “Website Based Patent Information Searching Mechanism” International journal of Computer Engineering & Technology (IJCET), Volume 1, Issue 2, 2010, pp. 180 - 191, Published by IAEME. 8. Ms. A. Suganthy, G.S.Sumithra, J.Hindusha, A.Gayathri and S.Girija, “Semantic Web Services And Its Challenges” International journal of Computer Engineering & Technology (IJCET), Volume 1, Issue 2, 2010, pp. 26 - 37, Published by IAEME. 217