Your SlideShare is downloading. ×
Curricula challenges of technical and management education institutions
Curricula challenges of technical and management education institutions
Curricula challenges of technical and management education institutions
Curricula challenges of technical and management education institutions
Curricula challenges of technical and management education institutions
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×

Thanks for flagging this SlideShare!

Oops! An error has occurred.

×
Saving this for later? Get the SlideShare app to save on your phone or tablet. Read anywhere, anytime – even offline.
Text the download link to your phone
Standard text messaging rates apply

Curricula challenges of technical and management education institutions

99

Published on

0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total Views
99
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
0
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
1
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

Report content
Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
No notes for slide

Transcript

  • 1. International Journal of Management (IJM), ISSN 0976 – 6502(Print), ISSN 0976 –INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT (IJM) 6510(Online), Volume 4, Issue 1, January- February (2013)ISSN 0976 – 6367(Print)ISSN 0976 – 6375(Online)Volume 4, Issue 1, January- February (2013), pp. 56-60 IJM© IAEME: www.iaeme.com/ijm.html ©IAEMEJournal Impact Factor (2012): 3.5420 (Calculated by GISI)www.jifactor.com CURRICULA CHALLENGES OF TECHNICAL AND MANAGEMENT EDUCATION INSTITUTIONS Dr. A. G. Matani Associate Professor- Mech Engg Government College of Engineering Amravati- 444604[ M.S.]- India Email: ashokgm333@rediffmail.com ABSTRACT Countries that invest more in research and development (R&D) generate more new knowledge. USA, UK and Japan have US$25,000 GDP and spend 2% of their GDP on research; Thailand, Malaysia and Indonesia with US$ 5000 GDP, spend only 0.5% in R&D, India and China are spending 1% in R & D. Most developing countries spend less than 1%. Major universities and centers of excellence play a vital role in knowledge generation. The powerful universities have always dominated the production and distribution of knowledge, while weaker institutions and systems with fewer resources and lower academic standards have tended to follow them. This paper attempts to highlight the relevance of curriculum on the quality of teaching and teaching learning process in the technical and management education institutions in India. Key words: collaborative learning, Information and communication technologies, knowledge generation, digitalized knowledge. INTRODUCTION Teaching is one of the most challenging and crucial professions in the world. Teachers are critical in facilitating learning and in making it more efficient and effective; they hold the key to the success of any educational reform; and they are accountable for successful human development of the nation and for preparing the foundation for social and economic development. Yet, they are usually ill-prepared and left on their own to understand and address the needs of students, parents, administrators, society, the economy, and the past, present, and future. [Altbach 2003]. 56
  • 2. International Journal of Management (IJM), ISSN 0976 – 6502(Print), ISSN 0976 –6510(Online), Volume 4, Issue 1, January- February (2013) Most universities adapt quickly to global trends in order to stay competitive andrelevant. The rapidly changing world demands that universities be current and up to date.This dynamic redefines the importance of various disciplines. N.R. Narayana Murthy, theChairman of Infosys recommended that in order to have world-class educational institutionsin India, educational institutions should be allowed to function as an industry in a free marketenvironment. Universities should be allowed to form alliances with firms for research andfunding. Businesses must be consulted in curriculum design and in the conducting of courses.Educational institutions, for their part, should stress innovation, research and developmentand the creation of new knowledge. [Murthy 2005].MAJOR LEADERSHIP CHALLENGES[1] Market forces Market forces will continue to drive change in organizations at a macroeconomiclevel, and these forces will demand more from our organizations and our leaders. Largerorganizations in most industries gain economies of scale as they distribute overhead expensesacross more units of production. This leads to greater profits and stock valuation. Beingglobal, or more precisely, offering products or services in a variety of countries and cultures,increases the size of the market to be served. Technology advances have greatly reduced thecosts of reaching these different geographically dispersed markets.[2] People issues Tomorrows staff will have very different expectations of, and demands on, theirorganizations, the employee-employer relationship in the best organizations of tomorrow willlook very different, the ability to balance employee needs at global level and customer wantsat both global and local levels - a balance that will become harder to strike, and to strikeprofitably and efficiently, in the coming years. As the work force continues to grow morediverse, those able to accept individual differences in the workplace and to look at them as asource of creative energy and productivity will have access to a larger and more talentedwork force. In a quickly changing world, talented human capital will be a prime ingredient ofbusiness success.[3] Leadership competencies Strategic focus and vision, coupled with a practical sense of when to be flexible andadaptable, will be most critical for survival. Key leadership competencies will include: theability to develop and articulate a value proposition - maintaining it in a dynamic market andenergizing others to buy into it; investing in a business model that guides employee decision-making at all levels; committing to a culture that values mentorship and learning whilealigning individual and corporate goals, and recognizing what it means to develop andmanage truly transformational knowledge systems. [Lucas F. Johnston]FACTORS AFFECTING PERFORMANCE OF EDUCATIONAL SYSTEMS** Globalization, with digitalized knowledge and permeable educational boundaries** Connectivity through the Internet, which results in a globalization of information andincreased access** Increasing digital divide, due to differing access capacity** Commoditization of knowledge, and a more consumer-oriented attitude in the university 57
  • 3. International Journal of Management (IJM), ISSN 0976 – 6502(Print), ISSN 0976 –6510(Online), Volume 4, Issue 1, January- February (2013)** Government funding decreases, leading to a more competitive stance** Need for lifelong learning, which demands new approachesIn this context, technical and management education institutions are faced with some seriouschallenges:** Improving quality, increasing access and reducing costs** Modularizing education so that it can be used and re-used** Changing the role of faculty** Developing e-learning competencies** Changing institutional leadership styles to become more adaptable and flexibleTraining in the workplace has become a continuous need as firms find it necessary to providetheir staff with opportunities to upgrade their skills and acquire new ones to adjust to newmarket demands. However, traditional face-to-face training is costly—particularly in terms oftrainees’ time and travel. Firms have introduced different levels of e-training—providingsynchronous and asynchronous opportunities through the Internet, videoconferencing, videos,CDs, television, etc. [Dimitrios Koufopoulos, Maria Argyropoulou & George Kalchev ]OFFERING MULTI-PERSPECTIVE CURRICULUM • Continuously expose students and staff to multiple views of the world (create different socio-cultural/educational societies, promote interdisciplinary activities, harness experiences of all the students in teaching and learning, value alternative world views, use comparative approaches to teaching); • Encourage reflexive learning and teaching (reflexive dialogue, keeping reflexive diaries, reflexive teaching/learning logs) so that students can constantly and critically reshape their approaches and views about learning and teaching; • Seek to create a culture that makes students and staff feel that the university is a democratic meeting place where the encounter of diversity (in terms of gender, maturity, culture, nationality) creates opportunities to develop new competencies, knowledge and understandings. • Increase opportunities for collaborative learning (communities of practice, group work, workshops, and seminars) which exploit the diversity within the student body.INTEGRATING TECHNOLOGY INTO THE CURRICULUM Chickering and Gamsons seven principles of good practice need to be implementedfor integrating technology into the curriculum. These are:-** Encourage contact between students and faculty.** Develop reciprocity and cooperation among students.** Encourage active learning.** Give prompt feedback.** Emphasize time on task.** Communicate high expectations.** Respect diverse talents and ways of learning. 58
  • 4. International Journal of Management (IJM), ISSN 0976 – 6502(Print), ISSN 0976 –6510(Online), Volume 4, Issue 1, January- February (2013)Birla Institute of Technology and Science (BITS), Pilani and its global alumni associationBITSAA have launched BITSConnect 2.0. a model of multi-campus education in India,comprising Immersive Telepresence, High-definition Video Conferencing and LiveStreaming technologies . By bridging the geographical distance across campuses and globalknowledge centers, this platform will facilitate collaboration among its faculty, students,industry partners and alumni, for education, research and mentorship. This joint University-Alumni initiative will provide seamless integration of all campuses, create new avenues ofresearch collaboration and knowledge sharing among faculty, students and researchersworldwide. To collaborate, Faculty and Staff no longer need to travel. Academicians fromacross the world will be able to collaborate with and mentor research projects in BITS viaImmersive Telepresence.CONCLUSIONS The 21st Century universities, technical and management education institutions facenumerous challenges at local, regional and global levels. Problems and issues in the currentsocio-economic and geo-political aspects demand broader, multi-perspective understandingabout the world, life and work. As the most visible and significant site of knowledge creation,the educational institutions has a social responsibility to equip the members of the societywith necessary competencies, knowledge, understandings, and new skills so that they canconstantly negotiate the changing nature of work, the labor force, information technologiesand cultural identities of people.Curriculum content and the pedagogical approaches used by teachers are key vehicles forimproving teaching and learning for all students. Internationalizing the curriculum involvesproviding students with global perspectives of their discipline and giving them a broaderknowledge base for their future careers.REFERENCES[1] Altbach, Philip G. (2003). Globalization and the Universities Myth and Realities in anUnequal World. Journal of Educational Planning and Administration, Vol: XVII, No: 2,pp.227-247[2] Caruana, V. & Spurling, N. (2007). The Internationalization of UK Higher Education: areview of selected material. Project Report. Higher Education Academy.[3] Dimitrios Koufopoulos, Maria Argyropoulou & George Kalchev (2009), Challenges andProspects in Modern Management ATINER[4] Huddart, T. & Jackson, E. (2010) Understanding internationalization of home students forimprovements to curriculum design[5] Jones, E. & Killick, D. (2007). Internationalization of the curriculum. In E. Jones & S.Brown (Eds). Internationalizing Higher Education. London: Routledge.[66] Lucas F. Johnston (2012), Cases, Challenges, and Opportunities from Across theCurriculum, Routledge – 262 pages[7] Murthy, N.R.N. (2005). Government regulation stifling higher education. United News ofIndia, Kochi, India[8] NKC (National Knowledge Commision), (2006). Recommendation for Higher Educationin India, NKC, New Delhi. 59
  • 5. International Journal of Management (IJM), ISSN 0976 – 6502(Print), ISSN 0976 –6510(Online), Volume 4, Issue 1, January- February (2013)[9] Report of World Bank (2012), Strengthening Education Quality in East Asia (SABER:System Assessment and Benching marking for Education Results - EAST Asia Pilot) WorldBank; Bangkok: UNESCO Bangkok, 142 p[10] Report : BITS Pilani Launches New Model for Multi-Campus Education dtd.16 January2013.[11] C.Ramanigopal, “Knowledge Management Strategies In Higher Education” Internationaljournal of Advanced Research in Management (IJARM), Volume 3, Issue 1, 2012,pp. 20 - 29, Published by IAEME.[12] Dr. C. Kavitha and S. Sushma Raj, “A New Paradigm In Management Of Higher EducationalInstitutes Of Government Sector, India” International Journal of Management (IJM), Volume 3,Issue 2, 2012, pp. 32 - 42, Published by IAEME 60

×