Roland Vossen, Atlis

750 views
637 views

Published on

EMODNet, 12 februari 2010, Bunnik

0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total views
750
On SlideShare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
60
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
5
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide
  • 1. Discovery of Data. It is difficult for potential users to obtain an overview of what data - biological, chemical, physical, geological - are available in a particular region. 2. Access to data. Those holding the data may not release them either because of confidentiality or security constraints, because they do not or cannot allocate sufficient resources for archiving and maintaining data (e.g. data stored on increasingly obsolete technological systems) or because they wish to retain a monopoly of products derived from the data. 3. Use of data. Even where data are available, their use or re-use may be limited by the data policy of the owner. The primary driver for data creation can limit their broader use. 4. Cost of data. The prices imposed by some data-owners reduces the uptake of these data by users. 5. Coherence of Data. Developing a complete picture in time and space over a sea-area using data collected by different bodies is complicated by fragmented standards, formats and nomenclature. This is particularly the case when there is a need to study cross-border areas or to use data stemming from EN 17 EN diverse expert communities.. Whether studying ocean circulation, fish stock populations or tsunamis, data from different sources are required. 6. Quality of Data. There are no universally-recognised measures of quality, precision or accuracy. Metadata documentation may be sparse or inadequate so potential users do not know what confidence to ascribe to the data. 7. Quantity of Data. At present there is not enough data being observed to meet many user requirements. There are serious gaps in coverage and range of data types.
  • SeaDataNet SeaDataNet has federated open digital repositories to manage, access and share data, information, products and knowledge originating from oceanographic fleets, new automatic observation systems and space sensors.
  • Directorate Matime – for Maritime affairs and Fisheries
  • 7 partners
  • Coördinatie: OGS 25 partners (cumm. 46)
  • Coördinatie: Vlaams Instituut voor de Zee 10 partners (cumm. 56)
  • Coördinatie: JNCC 6 partners (cumm. 62) (netto 62 – 13 = 49 organisaties)
  • Roland Vossen, Atlis

    1. 1. EMODnet European Marine Observation and Data Network
    2. 2. Agenda <ul><li>Background </li></ul><ul><li>Objectives </li></ul><ul><li>Standards </li></ul><ul><li>Schedule </li></ul><ul><li>Project organization </li></ul><ul><li>Coverage </li></ul><ul><li>Hydrographic Lot </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Objectives </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Data </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Interfacing Systems </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Hydrographic Portal </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Questions </li></ul>
    3. 3. Background <ul><li>The behavior of seas and oceans is crucial to human life on this planet </li></ul><ul><ul><li>The marine life influences the provision of food </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Changes in coastal morphology influence erosion, flooding and maritime transport </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Ocean circulation is a primary, if poorly-understood, influence on the terrestrial climate </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Since the industrial revolution there is an ever growing interdependence between the human and marine domains </li></ul><ul><li>The impact of future changes in oceanic systems, their impact on human activity and the feedbacks on the ocean cannot be forecast without understanding the way the system works </li></ul>
    4. 4. Objectives <ul><li>Define the appropriate processes, develop the best technology and estimate the costs of a final operational European Marine Observation and Data Network </li></ul><ul><li>Provide first components of a final system </li></ul><ul><li>Assemble fragmented and inaccessible marine data into interoperable, contiguous and publicly available data streams for complete maritime basins. </li></ul>
    5. 5. Objectives <ul><li>Discovery of Data </li></ul><ul><li>Access to data </li></ul><ul><li>Use of data </li></ul><ul><li>Cost of data </li></ul><ul><li>Coherence of Data </li></ul><ul><li>Quality of Data. </li></ul><ul><li>Quantity of Data </li></ul>
    6. 6. Standards <ul><li>INSPIRE </li></ul><ul><li>OGC </li></ul><ul><li>SeaDataNet </li></ul>
    7. 7. Schedule May 2009 May 2010 May 2011 May 2012 November 2010 Definition & development Pilot Improvements Operational pilot
    8. 8. Projectorganisatie EMODnet DG MARE Hydrography Geology Chemistry Biology Broad Scale Habitats
    9. 9. <ul><li>Water depth in gridded form (500 m grid) </li></ul><ul><li>Water depth in vector form with isobaths at a scale of at least one to one million. </li></ul><ul><li>Coastlines </li></ul><ul><li>Underwater features </li></ul>EMODnet DG MARE Geology Chemistry Biology Broad Scale Habitats Hydrography Data
    10. 10. <ul><li>MARIS – NL (Management, DM and IT expertise) </li></ul><ul><li>IFREMER – FR (Research institute) </li></ul><ul><li>ATLIS – NL (IT expertise, DM hydrography) </li></ul><ul><li>IEO – ES (Research institute) </li></ul><ul><li>NERC-NOCS – UK (Research institute) </li></ul><ul><li>GSI – IE (HO – Ireland) </li></ul><ul><li>SHOM – FR (HO – France) </li></ul><ul><li>Data form HO’s Germany, Norway, Denmark, Netherlands and Belgium </li></ul>EMODnet DG MARE Geology Chemistry Biology Broad Scale Habitats Hydrography Organizations
    11. 11. <ul><li>Sea-bed sediments </li></ul><ul><li>Sea-floor geology </li></ul><ul><li>Boundaries and faults </li></ul><ul><li>Rate of coastal erosion or sedimentation </li></ul><ul><li>Geological events and event probabilities (landslides, volcanic, earthquake epicentres) </li></ul><ul><li>Seismic profiles </li></ul><ul><li>Minerals (including aggregates, oil and gas). </li></ul>Geology Data EMODnet DG MARE Hydrography Geology Chemistry Biology Broad Scale Habitats
    12. 12. <ul><li>Finland </li></ul><ul><li>Latvia </li></ul><ul><li>Lithuania </li></ul><ul><li>Estonia </li></ul><ul><li>Poland </li></ul><ul><li>Germany </li></ul><ul><li>Denmark </li></ul><ul><li>Norway </li></ul><ul><li>Sweden </li></ul><ul><li>Netherlands </li></ul><ul><li>Belgium </li></ul><ul><li>France </li></ul><ul><li>Ireland </li></ul><ul><li>UK </li></ul>Geology Organizations EMODnet DG MARE Hydrography Geology Chemistry Biology Broad Scale Habitats
    13. 13. <ul><li>synthetic compounds </li></ul><ul><ul><li>pesticides, </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Anti foulants, </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>pharmaceuticals, </li></ul></ul><ul><li>heavy metals, </li></ul><ul><li>Radio nuclides; </li></ul><ul><li>fertilizers and other nitrogen- and phosphorus-rich substances </li></ul><ul><li>organic matter (e.g. from sewers or mariculture) </li></ul><ul><li>hydrocarbons including oil pollution </li></ul>Chemistry Data EMODnet DG MARE Hydrography Geology Chemistry Biology Broad Scale Habitats
    14. 14. Chemistry Organizations EMODnet DG MARE Hydrography Geology Chemistry Biology Broad Scale Habitats
    15. 15. <ul><li>phytoplankton </li></ul><ul><li>zooplankton </li></ul><ul><li>angiosperms </li></ul><ul><li>macro-algae </li></ul><ul><li>invertebrate bottom fauna, </li></ul><ul><li>bird communities </li></ul><ul><li>sea mammals. </li></ul><ul><li>reptiles </li></ul>Biology Data EMODnet DG MARE Hydrography Geology Chemistry Biology Broad Scale Habitats
    16. 16. <ul><li>VLIZ : EurOBIS, ERMS, WoRMS, PESI </li></ul><ul><li>NIOO-CEME : MarBEF, MARS </li></ul><ul><li>MARIS & IFREMER : Seadatanet </li></ul><ul><li>GBIF </li></ul><ul><li>Bremen University: PANGAEA </li></ul><ul><li>ICES </li></ul><ul><li>Rutgers University: OBIS </li></ul><ul><li>IBSS: Black Sea Marine Biology Network </li></ul><ul><li>ESF-Marine Board (advisory) </li></ul><ul><li>IODE (advisory) </li></ul>Biology Organizations EMODnet DG MARE Hydrography Geology Chemistry Biology Broad Scale Habitats
    17. 17. <ul><li>Sediment </li></ul><ul><li>Bathymetry </li></ul><ul><li>Light </li></ul><ul><li>Wave energy at seabed </li></ul><ul><li>Tidal energy at seabed </li></ul><ul><li>Salinity at seabed </li></ul><ul><li>Temperature at seabed </li></ul><ul><li>O2/POC/Chl </li></ul><ul><li>Ice cover </li></ul><ul><li>Stratification </li></ul>Broad Scale Habitats Data EMODnet DG MARE Hydrography Geology Chemistry Biology Broad Scale Habitats
    18. 18. <ul><li>Joint Nature Conservation Committee, UK </li></ul><ul><li>Ifremer </li></ul><ul><li>DHI </li></ul><ul><li>ISPRA </li></ul><ul><li>Swedish Environmental Protection Agency (NVV) </li></ul><ul><li>IEO </li></ul>Broad Scale Habitats Organizations EMODnet DG MARE Hydrography Geology Chemistry Biology Broad Scale Habitats
    19. 19. Coverage
    20. 20. Coverage
    21. 21. Hydrographic lot <ul><li>Objectives </li></ul><ul><li>Data </li></ul><ul><li>Interfacing Systems </li></ul><ul><li>Hydrographic Portal </li></ul>
    22. 22. Objectives <ul><li>Collate existing data from public and private organisations </li></ul><ul><li>Assessing their accuracy and precision and assembling them into common datasets; </li></ul><ul><li>Develop, test, operate and maintain a portal allowing public access and viewing of these data </li></ul><ul><li>Monitor and report on the effectiveness of the system </li></ul><ul><li>Analyze further steps for improvement </li></ul><ul><li>Analyze the necessary requirements to maintain the components built up in each lot as a sustainable infrastructure </li></ul><ul><li>Keep the portal operational during project </li></ul>
    23. 23. Data - layers
    24. 24. Interfacing Systems
    25. 25. Hydrographic Portal - components
    26. 26. Hydrographic Portal – user interface
    27. 32. EMODnet ? ? May 2009 May 2010 May 2011 November 2010

    ×