Evidence: Denver and DC Quakes Caused byNukeshttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UGlvu_MMa9gThe sudden spike shown in both the very unusual DC and Denver earthquakes on August 23are consistent with an explosion from a sub-surface nuclear bomb. A recent interview ofBenjamin Fulford by David Wilcock gives some intriguing possibilities about a counter coup,and hope for release of suppressed energy technologies.by Sterling D. Allan
Today Ive received a phone call and a number ofemails from people referring to an interview thatDavid Wilcock conducted recently withBenjamin Fulford, who asserts that the recent DCand Denver Quakes were spurred by underground nukes wiping out two of the New World Orderbunkers by "white hat" elements in the U.S. Pentagon, signaling the end of days for the darkcabal that have been running the planet for millennia. The interview concludes with a discussionabout how with this victory over the dark elements of the former powers-that-be, that manyhitherto suppressed energy technologies will soon be released.Its all a bit difficult to believe, and I probably wouldnt be mentioning it to you were it not forsome hard facts that support the key points about the earthquakes not being natural. They havethe same seismological signature as what accompanies a nuclear blast detonated a few milesbelow the Earths surface.Here is a government website that gives a comparison of a nuclear test and an earthquake onseismograph. Here is a comparison they show between the May 11, 1998 Indian Nuclear Test,and the April 4, 1995 earthquake in Pakistan.It explains:Livermore seismologist Bill Walter explains that the differences in seismic P- and S-waveenergy provide one method of discriminating explosions from earthquakes. Seismic P waves arecompressional waves, similar to sound waves in the air. Shear (S) waves are transverse waves,like those that propagate along a rope when one end is shaken. Because underground explosionsare spherically symmetric disturbances, they radiate seismic P waves efficiently. In contrast,earthquakes result from sliding or rupture along a buried fault surface and strongly excite thetransverse motions of S waves. Thus, we expect that explosions will show strong P waves and
weak S waves and that earthquakes will show weak P waves and strong S waves, as seen inFigure 2.With that in mind, now look at this image of the seismic signature of the DC quake as shown atNBC17: Readings from a seismograph at Washington and Lee University, about 85 miles southwest of the earthquakes epicenter in Mineral.Does that seismograph depict a natural quake or a nuke or explosion-induced quake?Could it be any more blatant?Its as obvious as Building 7 being brought down by pre-placed demolition charges on 9/11.Heres the seismograph from the August 23 Denver quake that same day, as published by theDenver Post. A seismogram of the Trinidad earthquake as recorded on the Kent Denver School seismograph.Again, the immediate onset of the large quake at the bottom right is indicative of an explosion-induced quake, not a natural quake.
In poking around a little bit, I found an August 24 story from the Canadian PressCore, titled:Seismic evidence reveals underground nuclear detonation south of Washington DC. The authorsays that he was put onto this possibility by an unusual email he received from someone whoapparently was a whistleblower.I was pointed to this overlooked piece of evidence by someone who claimed to be with theUnited States Air Force. The story submission appeared to be sent by mistake as nothing wasvisible in the body of the submission. Instead of sending it to the trash I thought I would apply anold intelligence trick I was taught back in 1989. I right clicked my mouse on the body of thesubmission and selected all, then copy. I then opened up the notepad and selected paste from themenu. You would expect nothing to be pasted as there was nothing in the body of the submissionbut, just as I thought, a paragraph was pasted into the notepad. What was revealed was 1paragraph whereby who ever sent it stated he was a member of the United States Air Force. Hestated that the Virginia 5.8 magnitude earth "wasnt a natural earthquake and not a HAARPearthquake". He told me to find a seismograph of the Washington DC area earthquake andcompare it to a past earthquake. Then he stated that I should Google DUMB or DeepUnderground Military Bases. He ended by stating "the ABC warnings are real". I tried to tracethe IP of the submission but they dont exists. Air Force tunnel boring machine links deep underground military bases across U.S.
In the introduction to his interview with Fulford about the Denver and D.C. earthquakes not onlybeing nuke-induced, but that they were used to destroy two underground New World Orderbunker cities (of possibly 30,000 people each), Wilcock says:I started to contact my own sources, which have been built up over being a public figure on theInternet since 1999 – and gaining the trust of many people in various classified programs. I wasabsolutely astonished when I started to ask around and found out that everyone I know, with oneexception who probably wasnt on a need-to-know basis, confirmed that this attack did happen.Im familiar with the underground bunkers and cities that the black ops have been building. Thebest documentary I know on this was done by Jesse Ventura in his "Conspiracy Theory" series. Ibuilt a feature page on the 2012 episode in which the last half of the program was devoted to theunderground bunkers that have quietly been built by dark elements in the U.S. Governmentlooking out for their own survival with no thought for informing or preparing the population atlarge.Here is some material that my awakened friend, Fred Burks compiled, who was formerly atranslator for two U.S. Presidents: Comparisons of seismograph readings for earthquakes with nuclear tests https://www.llnl.gov/str/Walter.html - Comparison of a nuclear test and an earthquake on seismograph on a government website http://www.iris.edu/hq/programs/education_and_outreach/animations/17 - Comparison of seismograph signatures for various events Washington, DC, 5.8 earthquake on Aug 23, 2011, 1:51 PM local time http://www2.nbc17.com/news/2011/aug/23/13/59-earthquake-rocks-virginia-ar-1324668 - Most striking seismograph of DC quake on NBC affiliate http://www.news.cornell.edu/stories/Aug11/SneeEarthquake.html - Cornell University seismograph quite definitive http://www.geol.vt.edu/outreach/vtso/2011/0823-louisa - Multiple seismographs of DC quake http://www.iris.edu/cgi- bin/wilberII/wilberII_EnO_page4.pl?evname=20110823_175103.5.spyder - Access to hundreds more Denver, 5.3 earthquake on Aug 22, 2011, 11:43 PM local time (roughly 12 hours before the DC quake) http://www.denverpost.com/news/ci_18737351 - Denver Post seismograph showing clearly nuclear explosion signature http://www.iris.edu/cgi- bin/wilberII/wilberII_EnO_page4.pl?evname=20110822_233020.4.spyder - Hundreds of
seismograph readings To see what seismographs look like for more normal earthquakes, click below: http://www.iris.edu/cgi- bin/wilberII/wilberII_EnO_page4.pl?evname=20110818_153740.0.spyder - 4.6 scale Aug 18, 2011 Off the coast of British Columbia http://www.iris.edu/cgi- bin/wilberII/wilberII_EnO_page4.pl?evname=20110902_110325.7.spyder - 4.7 scale Sep 2, 2011 Utah Both the Denver and DC earthquakes were quite shallow, with official reports giving 3.7 miles depth for the DC quake (http://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/recenteqsww/Quakes/se082311a.php) and 2.5 miles for Denver (http://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/eqinthenews/2011/usc0005idz). That is well within even conventional drilling technologies these days (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kola_Superdeep_Borehole). According to Wikipedia (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Earthquake), earthquakes under 70 km (43 miles) are considered "shallow focus" earthquakes. The Virginia quake was the largest there in 117 years, while the Denver quake was the largest in Colorado in 41 years. These two rare quakes happened only 12 hours apart. (Washington Post; Denver Post; Aug. 23, 2011) So I find the evidence fairly solid that both of these quakes were not natural.I agree with Fred that there is definitely enough evidence to consider the two very unusualquakes on August 23 as probably being spurred by nukes. The question that is intriguing is why,who, and how. Though its hard to believe all the stuff covered in the Wilcock-Fulfordinterview, I do think its worth a perusal, to give you something to think about and a workinghypothesis to start from. Its definitely worth our attention, especially if the release of hithertosuppressed free energy patents is one of the upshots of this recent counter coup.What is alleged by Fulford and Wilcock is that the nukes were done by good elements in thePentagon who are fed up with the New World Order conspirators using the US Military toenforce the spread of the police state tyranny, whose plan is to reduce the world population by90% down to a "manageable" 500,000,000.I personally am greatly encouraged by the possibility that there is that high a level of resistancefrom within the ranks of what used to be nearly totally controlled by the conspirators. Its arebellion from within what used to be something they controlled.The two underground cities were probably two key bunkers where the New World Orderconspirators thought they could go run and hide while they bring destruction to the inhabitantson the surface. But now they have been sent a message: "Were all in this together here on planetEarth; what you do to others you do to yourself, so stop the destruction."
Hanks Mills comments....On September 17, 2011 11:43 PM, my associate Hank Mills added:Elected government officials are not the only individuals who control the course of humanevents. There exists powerful individuals from the realms of banking, finance, secretive extra-government agencies, and the military-industrial complex, who manipulate the strings that makethe puppets in official elected offices do their bidding. This tangled web of the ultra elite powerbarons is not easy to sort through. I do not think anyone fully understands the true structure ofthese organizations, and their true motivations. What we do know, is that these institutes andfamilies of power have suppressed exotic technologies and the truth about extraterrestrial activityon our planet. This suppression has been on going since before the crash of an extraterrestrialspace craft near Roswell, NM in the year 1947.If a nuclear attack did take place on one or more underground bases, this would be a clearindication of dissension in the ranks of the "powers that be." This whole situation reminds me --to a certain extent --of the situation in the fictional series Stargate SG1. In that fictional series, ahighly secret, ultra black-budget military organization exists called, "Stargate Command." Theleadership of this organization have the task of trying to protect our planet from extraterrestrialthreats, exploring the galaxy by traveling through "stargates" which allow near instantaneoustravel to other worlds, and maintaining the secrecy of their program. Those working for Stargate
Command are portrayed as being the "good guys", despite the fact they suppress exotictechnologies, withhold fundamental information about the universe from the public, and oftentake it upon themselves to make decisions that impact the entire human race -- mostly with littlesupervision from elected authorities.In this same fictional series, there are rouge groups, agencies, and organizations that competewith the Stargate program. Some of these entities claim to be opposed to Stargate Commandssecrecy and track record of sometimes putting humanity at risk, but in reality have their selfishmotivations. Of course there are groups of extraterrestrials in this fictional series that have theirown desires and interests. Some of these groups of extraterrestrials are benevolent, others areopportunistic, and still others are hostile. Although communicating with these species have oftenbenefited Stargate Commands efforts to protect humanity, interaction with them have oftencreated troublesome situations or threats to Earth.The simple fact is that in the fictional series of Stargate and in our reality, it is not always easy todistinguish the good guys from the bad guys. Even the attack on the underground bases may (ormay not) have prevented some sinister plot, this does not mean those who launched the attackwere "good." They may not be heroes, or on the side of the billions of people on this planet.Their motivation for the attack may not be as simple and pure as we may hope.If these apparent earthquakes were actually attacks on underground bunkers, thousands of peoplemay have died. Many of these people probably were not evil, sinister individuals plotting for theeradication of 90% of the population, but could have simply been engineers and scientistsworking jobs, to earn a paycheck. The majority of those employed by these bases may have hadno political agenda at all, and simply were thrilled to work on exotic technologies -- or needed tofind a way to pay their mortgage!For example, NASA has naysayed alternative energy and alternative propulsion technologies fordecades. The space agency has also belittled and mocked the incontrovertible evidence thatunknown craft are visiting our planet. Regardless what we think of those who have activelyparticipated in suppression, we cannot forget that the majority of people at NASA have hadnothing to do with it. To think that everyone at NASA is in a plot to suppress information thatcould change our world is simply implausible beyond measure. Most of those individualsworking at NASA truly believe they are working for the agency with the most advanced spacetechnology in existence, or are simply there to get a paycheck.Any nuclear attack that has taken place is a total and complete tragedy. If those who perpetuatedthe attack desired to do the right thing, they should have organized a way to come forward to thepublic, and share what they knew. Instead, these individuals -- many of which have probablybeen actively participating in suppression of various topics -- may have taken another path thatlimits their personal risk while ending the lives of others. Standing up and releasing highlyclassified information about extraterrestrial life, exotic technologies that could benefit all ofhumanity, or the operations of ultra secretive organizations, can be risky. In fact, it can be verydangerous, but fear of persecution is not an excuse for a nuclear attack.I would urge the individuals and organizations that want to do the "right thing" to avoid conflicts
with other entities, and simply speak up. Despite their rank, position, or situation they shouldorganize the information they have, and share it with the world. We live in an age wherecommunication is easier than ever before. If someone really wants to tell a story, in a matter ofhours or less they can upload videos of their testimony to YouTube, send the video to thousandsof people via email, post the information on countless message boards, drop a few hundredDVDs in the mailbox, create a Facebook profile with the information, and transmit theinformation in so many ways NO ONE will be able to stop it.The more aspiring "good guys" who are willing to come forward and distribute their story at thesame time the better it is for everyone involved.There is no excuse for violence. Even when it comes protecting ones self, the best defense ishonesty and full disclosure. I think the motivations and sincerity of any group that wouldperpetuate an act of violence should be questioned.Lets hope if a nuclear attack did happen on one or more top secret bases, that these will be lastsuch attacks.What the world needs is the truth, the full truth, and nothing but the truth.Sterling Adds...The fact that the President and Congress have such low approval ratings has a lot to do with howunbelievable they have become. Who can trust the government when they say: "This is how andwhy 9/11 happened, and this is what we should do about it;" when a common sense look at whatactually happened screams so loudly to the contrary." Some truth from the government would benice, but it will take some time before people start believing again because they have been lied tofor so long.###This story is also published at BeforeItsNews.Links http://www.divinecosmos.com/start-here/davids-blog/975-undergroundbases - David Wilcocks interview with Benjamin Fulford Seismic evidence reveals underground nuclear detonation south of Washington DC. (PressCore; Aug. 24, 2011) 5.8-magnitude quake shakes central Va., East Coast (NBC17; Aug. 23, 2011) Minor damage from magnitude-5.3 Colorado quake (Denver Post; Aug. 23, 2011) http://www.whale.to/b/underground_h.html Obama Ordered To Denver Bunker By US Military "General Maslov states in his report, though, his concern over this drill is "heightened" due to last months nuclear attack on the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) branch of the intercontinental military tunnel complex between Washington D.C. and Denver, and which we reported on in our
24 August report Russia Reports Nuclear Explosions Hit Vast US Military Tunnel Network." (EU Times; Sept. 14, 2011) o Strange Sound Before Virginia Quake ! felt like the ground was shaking! (YouTube; Aug. 24, 2011)Were NORAD And Shadow Govt Bases The Nuke/Quake Targets? (BeforeItsNews; Sept. 20,2011)