Participant Observation
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×
 

Participant Observation

on

  • 6,509 views

 

Statistics

Views

Total Views
6,509
Views on SlideShare
6,507
Embed Views
2

Actions

Likes
0
Downloads
100
Comments
0

1 Embed 2

http://www.slideshare.net 2

Accessibility

Categories

Upload Details

Uploaded via as Microsoft PowerPoint

Usage Rights

© All Rights Reserved

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Processing…
Post Comment
Edit your comment
  • Which one is not like the others?

Participant Observation Participant Observation Presentation Transcript

  • Participant Observation Michael, Anna, Stacey, Laurisa, April
  • Our source
    • Mack, N., Woodsong, C., MacQueen, K.M., Guest, G. & Namey E. (2005). Participant Observation. In Qualitative Research Methods: A Data Collector's Field Guide . (pp. 13-28). Research Triangle Park, North Carolina: Family Health International
    Download the chapter free from: http:// www.fhi.org/en/RH/Pubs/booksReports / QRM_datacoll.htm
  • Participant Observation is kind of like being ….
  • Mixed with a little of this …
  • What is Participant Observation?
    • A qualitative method
    • Studies subjects in their own environment
    • Uses unobtrusive methods like writing observations in a field notebook
    • Strives to be objective and understand the subject’s point of view
    • Aims to be detailed and comprehensive
  • Methods of participant observation
    • Creating diagrams, charts and maps
    • Numerical data
    • Written, audio, photo and video recordings
    • Interviews and conversations
    • Can be done individually, in pairs, or in teams
    • Can occur in a structured or unstructured setting
  • Tips
    • Develop relationships with stakeholders
    • Engage in activities without calling attention to yourself
    • Always keep your research questions in mind
    • Do research on your subject before hand
    • Consider alternative forms of data
    • Distinguishing interpretation from observation
  • Example of interpretation vs. observation
  • Example of observation At first the client sat very stiffly on the chair next to the receptionist's desk. She (client) picked up a magazine and let the pages flutter through her fingers very quickly without really looking at any of the pages. She then set the magazine down, looked at her watch, tugged at her skirt, and picked up the magazine again. This time she didn't look at the magazine. She set it back down, took out a cigarette, and began smoking. She would watch the receptionist out of the corner of her eye, and then look back down at the magazine, and back up at the two or three other people waiting in the room. Her eyes moved from the people to the magazine to the cigarette to the people to the magazine in rapid succession. She avoided eye contact with anyone in the room. When her name was finally called by the receptionist, she jumped up like she was startled.
  • Ethics to consider confidentiality, consent, cultural context, disclosure
    • Weaknesses
    • Time-consuming
    • Documentation relies on memory, personal discipline, and diligence of researcher
    • Requires conscious effort at objectivity because method is inherently subjective
    • Strengths
    • Allows for insight into contexts, relationships, behavior
    • Can provide information previously unknown to researchers that is crucial for project design, data collection, and interpretation of other data
    Is Participant Observation the right method for me?
  • Some Case Study Examples
    • Jeong, W. (2004). Unbreakable ethnic bonds: information seeking behavior of Korean graduate students in the United States. Library and Information Science Research, 26(3), p. 384-400. Doi: 10.1016/j.lisr.2004.04.001
    • Tin, K. and Al-Hawamdeh, S. (2002). The changing role of paraprofessionals in the knowledge economy. Journal of Information Science, 28(4) , p. 331-343.
    • Gross, M., Dresang, E., and Holt, L. (2004). Children’s in-library use of computers in an urban public library. Library and Information Science Research, 26(3) , p. 311-337. Doi: 10.1016/j.lisr.2004.04.002
    • Chatman, E. (1986). Diffusion theory: a review and test of a conceptual model in information diffusion. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 37(6) , p. 377-386.