Reputation as (dis)incentive

1,412 views

Published on

Heather Piwowar at #sameAs on Reputation in a London Pub, May 2011

Published in: Education
0 Comments
3 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

No Downloads
Views
Total views
1,412
On SlideShare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
3
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
7
Comments
0
Likes
3
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

Reputation as (dis)incentive

  1. 1. Reputation as incentive Heather  Piwowar  @researchremix   DataONE  postdoc  with  NESCent  and  Dryad #sameAs  on  Reputation,  May  2011  
  2. 2. http://www.metmuseum.org/toah/ho/09/euwf/ho_24.45.1.htm
  3. 3. http://www.flickr.com/photos/jsmjr/62443357/
  4. 4. http://www.flickr.com/photos/camilleharrington/3587294608/
  5. 5. http://www.flickr.com/photos/rkuhnau/3318245976/
  6. 6. http://www.flickr.com/photos/conformpdx/1796399674/
  7. 7. http://www.flickr.com/photos/rkuhnau/3317418699/
  8. 8. http://www.flickr.com/photos/zemlinki/261617721/
  9. 9. http://www.flickr.com/photos/tracenmatt/3020786491/
  10. 10. http://www.flickr.com/photos/the-o/2078239333/
  11. 11. http://www.flickr.com/photos/sunrise/35819369/
  12. 12. Note: log scale
  13. 13. ~70%
  14. 14. http://www.flickr.com/photos/ryanr/142455033/
  15. 15. Reputation as incentive
  16. 16. Reputation as incentive
  17. 17. Reputationas disincentive
  18. 18. http://www.flickr.com/photos/joshb/25983792
  19. 19. http://www.flickr.com/photos/joshb/25983792
  20. 20. http://www.flickr.com/photos/joshb/25983792
  21. 21. http://www.flickr.com/photos/supersam5/216868485/
  22. 22. http://www.flickr.com/photos/commissariat/4829261601/ in/faves-30112411@N02/
  23. 23. http://www.flickr.com/photos/commissariat/4829261601/ in/faves-30112411@N02/
  24. 24. http://www.flickr.com/photos/samrich2003/175520596/
  25. 25. http://www.flickr.com/photos/nuttinbutlove/2954520460/
  26. 26. http://www.flickr.com/photos/kellyloveswhales/4009156878/
  27. 27. http://www.flickr.com/photos/supersam5/216868485/
  28. 28. Reputation
  29. 29. Standardpractice
  30. 30. journal  data  sharing  policy “An inherent principle of publication is that others should be able to replicate and build upon the authors published claims. Therefore, a condition of publication in a Nature journal is that authors are required to make materials, data and associated protocols available in a publicly accessible database …” http://www.nature.com/authors/editorial_policies/availability.html http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v453/n7197/index.html
  31. 31. High-impact journals tend to havea strong data-sharing policy Piwowar ELPUB 2008
  32. 32. Articles published in journalswith a strong data-sharing policyare more likely to have publicly available datasets Piwowar ELPUB 2008
  33. 33. Odds Ratio 0.25 0.50 1.00 2.00 4.00 8.00 Has journal policy Count of R01 & other NIH grantsAuthors prev GEOAE sharing & OA & microarray creation NOT K funding or P funding Journal impact Institution high citations & collaboration Journal policy consequences & long halflife Instititution is government & NOT higher ed NOT institution NCI or intramural NOT animals or mice Last author num prev pubs & first year pub Large NIH grant First author num prev pubs & first year pub Humans & cancer NOT geo reuse & YES high institution output Piwowar, PLoS ONE 2011 (soon), Who shares? Who doesn’t?
  34. 34. http://www.flickr.com/photos/sunrise/35819369/
  35. 35. http://www.flickr.com/photos/youraddresshere/6649228/
  36. 36. http://www.flickr.com/photos/huzzahvintage/4577075021/
  37. 37. thank youTodd Vision, Michael Whitlock, Wendy Chapman, DataONE and Dryad teamsThe open science online community and those who release their articles, datasets and photos openly

×