“ Visual argumentation” designates the act of presenting a premise, prompting a method of reasoning and making a claim, all achieved primarily through visual communication.
aspects
Any account of visual argumentation “must identify how we can
identify the internal elements of a visual image,
understand the contexts in which images are interpreted,
establish the consistency of an interpretation of the visual, and
chart changes in visual perspectives over time.”
“ Toward a Theory of Visual Argumentation,” David Birdsell and Leo Groarke, Argumentation and Advocacy, Summer 1996.
integrative approach
at the levels of:
pedagogy
curriculum
assessment
faculty and staff development
rhetoric
logos
pathos
ethos
example: logos in An Inconvenient Truth
example: pathos in An Inconvenient Truth
semiotics
Ferdinand de Saussure
sign
signifier
signified
Charles Peirce meaning is determined by reader/viewer in local context…
cinesemiotics
shot
scene
sequence
identification
interpellation and suturing
cultural studies
Stuart Hall
encoding/decoding
Marita Sturken and Lisa Cartwright
Practices of Looking: An Introduction to Visual Culture - race, class and gender in visual culture
media studies
immersive arguments
experiential arguments
the role of play and projective stance
James Gee
John Seely Brown and Doug Thomas
information visualization
Edward Tufte
“ working at the intersection of word, image, number and art.”
writing, typography, managing data sets, statistical analysis, line, layout and color…
“ escaping flatland”
visual tropes
metaphor
metonymy
juxtaposition
recontextualization
resources
Roland Barthes, “The Rhetoric of the Image”
Gunther Kress + Theo Van Leeuwen, Multimodal Discourse
Gunther Kress + Theo Van Leeuwen, Reading Images
Mary E. Hocks “Understanding Visual Rhetoric in Digital Writing Environments”
0 comments
Post a comment