ELC for CWR
Diversity assessment and gap analysis
Mauricio Parra Quijano
Ecogeographic land characterization for CWR diver...
ELC overview
It is a made-to-measure map according to researcher needs to
discriminate adaptive scenarios within a work fr...
ELC overview
How to delineate different adaptive scenarios in a work frame?
ELC overview
How in the past most of these type of maps were delineated?

DMEER - EEA, 2003
ELC overview
But what about abiotic masked conditions related to plant
physiology-adaptation?
ELC overview
Right now we have enough tools to achieve our own plant abioticadaptive maps thanks to

Geographic Informatio...
ELC overview
Right now we have enough tools to achieve our own plant abioticadaptive maps thanks to

Ecogeographic
Data (l...
ELC overview
If you know
… the resulting abiotic adaptive scenarios …

Your
data

Species
data

3
0

1

1
3

8

1

2

0

1

0

1

1

5
...
In situ gap analysis
… from an ecogeographical point of view, are you including key
populations in your protected areas?
S...
In situ gap analysis
… are you including key adaptive scenarios in your protected areas?

in situ
conservation




X
...
Why this approach works better for CWR?
… it’s about time
Human influence (domestication)

Specific environmental adaptati...
Ecogeographic Land Characterization Maps
For ex situ conservation can be used as a base of:
 Massive/fast ecogeographic g...
Ecogeographic Land Characterization Maps
For in situ conservation this methodology has been used only as a
criterion in st...
Thank you
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×

Ecogeographic land characterization for CWR diversity and gap analysis Workshop - presentation 1

124

Published on

Published in: Education
0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total Views
124
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
0
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
4
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

Ecogeographic land characterization for CWR diversity and gap analysis Workshop - presentation 1

  1. 1. ELC for CWR Diversity assessment and gap analysis Mauricio Parra Quijano Ecogeographic land characterization for CWR diversity and gap analysis Training workshop 26–27 February 2014, Room UG08, Learning Centre, University of Birmingham
  2. 2. ELC overview It is a made-to-measure map according to researcher needs to discriminate adaptive scenarios within a work frame ≠ Abiotic adaptation ≠ Adaptive genetic diversity
  3. 3. ELC overview How to delineate different adaptive scenarios in a work frame?
  4. 4. ELC overview How in the past most of these type of maps were delineated? DMEER - EEA, 2003
  5. 5. ELC overview But what about abiotic masked conditions related to plant physiology-adaptation?
  6. 6. ELC overview Right now we have enough tools to achieve our own plant abioticadaptive maps thanks to Geographic Information Systems and…
  7. 7. ELC overview Right now we have enough tools to achieve our own plant abioticadaptive maps thanks to Ecogeographic Data (layers) availability Soil Precipitation Temperature Aspect
  8. 8. ELC overview
  9. 9. If you know … the resulting abiotic adaptive scenarios … Your data Species data 3 0 1 1 3 8 1 2 0 1 0 1 1 5 0 1 and you also know the total possible scenarios for the target species (from known populations)
  10. 10. In situ gap analysis … from an ecogeographical point of view, are you including key populations in your protected areas? Species data Pops in situ conservation 1 0 8 2 2 2 1 0 1 0 5 1 1 0
  11. 11. In situ gap analysis … are you including key adaptive scenarios in your protected areas? in situ conservation     X  X
  12. 12. Why this approach works better for CWR? … it’s about time Human influence (domestication) Specific environmental adaptation
  13. 13. Ecogeographic Land Characterization Maps For ex situ conservation can be used as a base of:  Massive/fast ecogeographic germplasm characterization  Representativeness assessment in germplasm collections  Core collections And complement of other interesting methods such as:  Optimized germplasm collection  FIGS
  14. 14. Ecogeographic Land Characterization Maps For in situ conservation this methodology has been used only as a criterion in studies to:  Identify populations with high priority to be conserved  Identify protected areas which contain target environments / are covering priority populations  Determine optimal places for genetic reserves  Establish CWR national strategies  Prioritize sites to focus on on-farm conservation efforts
  15. 15. Thank you
  1. A particular slide catching your eye?

    Clipping is a handy way to collect important slides you want to go back to later.

×