Hicks Site 2008 Project Write Presentation
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×
 

Like this? Share it with your network

Share

Hicks Site 2008 Project Write Presentation

on

  • 3,856 views

A presentation by Troy Hicks for the SITE 2008 conference about Red Cedar Writing Project's Title II Professional Development grant, Project WRITE.

A presentation by Troy Hicks for the SITE 2008 conference about Red Cedar Writing Project's Title II Professional Development grant, Project WRITE.

Statistics

Views

Total Views
3,856
Views on SlideShare
3,787
Embed Views
69

Actions

Likes
1
Downloads
20
Comments
0

4 Embeds 69

http://projectwritemsu.wikispaces.com 60
https://projectwritemsu.wikispaces.com 5
http://www.slideshare.net 2
http://www.linkedin.com 2

Accessibility

Categories

Upload Details

Uploaded via as Microsoft PowerPoint

Usage Rights

© All Rights Reserved

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Processing…
Post Comment
Edit your comment
  • Situate your research in terms of the current state of the field of English education and talk about how that research informs your teaching. Who are you? What are you doing? Why are you doing it?

Hicks Site 2008 Project Write Presentation Presentation Transcript

  • 1. Project WRITE Writing, Reading, Inquiry, and Technology in Education Troy Hicks, PhD Central Michigan University SITE 2008
  • 2. Today’s Talk
    • Framing the Project
      • Writing Instruction, Adolescent Literacy, and Digital Literacy
      • Teacher Professional Development
    • Current PD Work
    • Implications of Current Work and Next Directions for Project
  • 3. The State of English Education
    • Implications of CEE Summit - May 2005
    • Today, new technologies are changing the types of texts we and our students create and interpret even as they are influencing the social, political, and cultural contexts in which our texts are composed and shared. Since these technologies are influencing the development of individuals, institutions, and communities (and since individuals, institutions, and communities are shaping these technologies and their uses), it is essential for English educators to turn a critical eye toward the benefits and affordances; the limitations and liabilities of integrating these newer technologies into our teaching.
    • - Swenson et al. (2005)
  • 4. Writing Inst. “ Grammar of Schooling” Assessment Attitudes Genres Adol. Lit. Literacy “Crisis” Curriculum Relationships Relevance Rigor Digital Lit. Changing Technologies Newer Literacies Access and Infrastructure
  • 5. The Pedagogy of Multiliteracies
    • In this book, we attempt to broaden this understanding of literacy and literacy teaching and learning to include negotiating a multiplicity of discourses... We argue that literacy pedagogy now must account for the burgeoning variety of text forms associated with information and multimedia technologies.
    • New London Group, p. 9
  • 6. Project WRITE: Pedagogy of Multiliteracies Model Situated Practice Creating a community of learners with a shared understanding of content area literacy and digital literacy Overt Instruction Modeling content area literacy strategies and uses of technologies such as blogs, wikis, podcasts, and digital stories while explicitly teaching skills to support teacher learning Critical Framing Reflecting on current practices and how our understanding and teaching of content area literacy and digital literacy is enacted Transformed Practice Moving towards a complex and creative understanding of literacy practices and how they are fully enacted within and across classrooms by engaging in collaborative work Core Goals Identify classroom literacy practices and implement new practices Develop thematic units of study that utilize technology
  • 7. Effective Professional Development
    • Engaging in pertinent literacy practices that will be used in their classrooms
    • Observing teacher leaders demonstrate these literacy practices
    • Focusing on students’ needs and achievements
  • 8.  
  • 9. Project WRITE PD Calendar
    • Two full days of PD - Oct and Nov 2007
    • One full day of PD - Dec 2007
    • Monthly night sessions - Jan - Apr 2008
    • One full day of PD - May 2008
    • One week of PD - August 2008
    • Two days of PD in fall 2008
  • 10. Project WRITE Shared Readings
    • Beers, G. Kylene, Probst, Robert E., & Rief, Linda. (2007). Adolescent literacy: Turning promise into practice . Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
    • Burke, Jim. (2003). Writing reminders: Tools, tips, and techniques . Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
    • Fletcher, Ralph J. (2006). Boy writers: Reclaiming their voices . Portland, Me.: Stenhouse Publishers.
    • Warlick, D. (2005). Raw materials for the mind: A teacher's guide to digital literacy . Lulu.com.
  • 11. Current Project Work
    • Monthly Professional Development Sessions
      • Focus on adolescent literacy, writing assessment, boy writers, digital literacies
    • Project Wiki
      • Reading and Discussion
      • Developing Own Curriculum
      • Collaborating with Others
    • Summer Workshop
  • 12. http://projectwritemsu.wikispaces.com/
  • 13. Implications of a Multiliteracies Approach
    • The metalanguage of Multiliteracies describes the elements of Design, not as rules, but as an heuristic that accounts for the infinite variability of different forms of meaning-making in relation to the cultures, the subcultures, or the layers of an individual’s identity that these forms serve.
    • - New London Group, p. 36
  • 14. Implications
    • Teacher Professional Development
      • Professional Learning Communities, as Enabled by Virtual and Face-to-Face Work
    • Purpose of English Education
      • Engaging in Multiliteracies Work
      • Teacher Education and Professional Development
  • 15. References
    • New London Group. (2000). A pedagogy of multiliteracies: Designing social futures. In B. Cope & M. Kalantzis (Eds.), Multiliteracies: Literacy learning and the design of social futures (pp. 9-37). London ; New York: Routledge.
    • Swenson, J., Rozema, R., Young, C. A., McGrail, E., & Whitin, P. (2005). Beliefs about technology and the preparation of English teachers: Beginning the conversation. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education [Online serial] Available: http://www.citejournal.org/vol5/iss3/languagearts/article1.cfm, 5 (3/4).
  • 16. Photo Credits
    • Logos from Wikipedia, Edublogs, del.icio.us, YouTube, Wikispaces, and MySpace are screenshots from the respective sites and copyrighted by those sites.
    • All other images: Troy Hicks or Red Cedar Writing Project, Michigan State University
  • 17. Produced by Troy Hicks [email_address] hickstro.org This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 United States License.