Annals of Knowledge Sharing in Distributed Software Development Environments: Experience from Open Source Software Projects

Loading...

Flash Player 9 (or above) is needed to view presentations.
We have detected that you do not have it on your computer. To install it, go here.

0 comments

Post a comment

    Post a comment
    Embed Video
    Edit your comment Cancel

    1 Event

    Annals of Knowledge Sharing in Distributed Software Development Environments: Experience from Open Source Software Projects - Presentation Transcript

    1. Annals of Knowledge Sharing in Distributed Software Development Environments: Experience from Open Source Software Projects Collaboration and Knowledge Sharing in Software Development Teams (SofTEAM ‘09) International Workshop on Software ENgineering within Social software Environments (SENSE09) Fraunhofer Institute Experimental Software Engineering, Kaiserslautern, Germany, March 3, 2009 . ______________________________________________________________________________________ Sulayman K. Sowe, Rishab A. Ghosh, Luc Soete Collaborative Creativity Group, UNU-MERIT, Maastricht, The Netherlands Contact: sowe@merit.unu.edu Annals of Knowledge Sharing in Distributed Software Development Environments: Experience from Open Source Software Projects By SKSowe
    2. Menu..... Knowledge sharing in distributed software development environments ● Knowledge sharing: Repositories ● Knowledge sharing: Metrics ● Knowledge sharing: Methodologies ● Nature of knowledge sharing in F/OSS projects ● Knowledge sharing in F/OSS projects: Some challenges ● /2/ Annals of Knowledge Sharing in Distributed Software Development Environments: Experience from Open Source Software Projects By SKSowe
    3. Knowledge sharing in distributed software development environments Knowledge sharing: ● A synergistic process where project participants establish knowledge links (k) by – “talking to each other”, and in the process get more than they put in: kAB= 1 if there is knowledge sharing between actors A and B, and 0 if otherwise. Benefits: ● Produce goods (software) and services (support). – Develop and refine project strategies. – Enable individual and project learning. – Helps build trust and confidence among participants. – Problems: ● How to leverage tacit knowledge of – community members? How to coordinate disperse individuals? – Providing easy to use tools for light- – weight knowledge sharing? Ways and means of studying team – members? /3/ Annals of Knowledge Sharing in Distributed Software Development Environments: Experience from Open Source Software Projects By SKSowe
    4. Knowledge sharing enablers ● 1 2 But we must ask ● Is there knowledge sharing? – Knowledge sharing Who are the people involved? – in the Bazaar How much knowledge sharing are team members? – /4/ Annals of Knowledge Sharing in Distributed Software Development Environments: Experience from Open Source Software Projects By SKSowe
    5. Knowledge sharing repositories Source code management (SCM) systems-CVS/SVN ● Who committed, changed, commented, modified what aspect of the code. Easy to revert to – earlier knowledge construct. Small number of people sharing knowledge regarding development process – Knowledge sharing is intense, trust and confidence is high and ● technology is not a barrier. Bug databases/tracking systems (BTS) ● Large number of people sharing knowledge on software quality assurance issues. – Who submitted, fixed, closed, commented on, assigned to which bug – Discussion on project milestone, software release cycle, etc. – Mailing lists ● Largest number of people sharing knowledge/experience/expertise. – Specialized 'rooms'; developers, users, localization, ports, documentation, etc. – Other knowledge sharing repositories ● IRC, IM, Wikis, Trac, documented off-line developers sprints – /5/ Annals of Knowledge Sharing in Distributed Software Development Environments: Experience from Open Source Software Projects By SKSowe
    6. Knowledge sharing metrics Experience from the sqo-oss and Flossmetrics projects Shows, in addition to product and process metrics, ● Composite community metrics are needed to understand the dynamics of – F/OSS development teams. Source code - CVS/SVN ● Count developers who made commits to the same module/branch of the code; Count – developers who commented on the code; Count cross-repository participation, etc. Bug tracking systems: ● Count open critical bugs at time_x; Count critical bugs fixed at time_x; Average time – to fix N bugs; Knowledge link between bug reporters and fixers, etc. Mailing lists: ● Count unique subscribers; Count messages per list per time_x; Average thread depth; – x_members in more than 1 list (knowledge brokerage) Total number of emails posted to a list (nposts) – Total number of replies made to questions posted to the lists (nreplies) – /6/ Annals of Knowledge Sharing in Distributed Software Development Environments: Experience from Open Source Software Projects By SKSowe
    7. Methodologies for studying Knowledge sharing Characteristics of the data: Debian developer and users mailing lists. 3735 developers with 29685 posts and 128933 replies. 5970 users with 193276 posts and 165380 replies. Mailing lists + SVN from Flossmetrics database on 14 projects. Flossmetrice data, 830 projects with BTS and 284 SVN dumps /7/ Annals of Knowledge Sharing in Distributed Software Development Environments: Experience from Open Source Software Projects By SKSowe
    8. Nature of knowledge sharing in F/OSS projects 1): Knowledge sharing is skewed: Small number of people (core) form knowledge cliques. 2): Knowledge brokerage. 3): The power-law nature of knowledge sharing. 4): Correlation between knowledge sharing activities. Developer List User List Test Variable nposts nreplies nposts nreplies 1000 ,475* 1000 ,550* Kandella’s taub nposts Corr. Coef. ,475* 1000 ,550* 1000 nreplies Corr. Coef. Spearmans rho nposts Corr. Coef. 1000 ,608* 1000 ,699* nreplies Corr. Coef. ,608* 1000 ,699* 1000 /8/ Annals of Knowledge Sharing in Distributed Software Development Environments: Experience from Open Source Software Projects By SKSowe
    9. Nature of knowledge sharing in F/OSS projects..cont. 5): Knowledge sharing in more than 1 repository: Developers tend to commit more to svn than post to mailing lists. But results are – inconclusive! Source: Flossmetrics database( ref. WOPDaSD08); 468 developers made 96749 commits, 61258 posts. /9/ Annals of Knowledge Sharing in Distributed Software Development Environments: Experience from Open Source Software Projects By SKSowe
    10. Knowledge sharing in F/OSS projects...some research challenges How to deal with large quantity of data? ● Howe to study software development teams from more than 1 view point – using data ● from different repositories? How to link data points from different repositories? ● How to ensure anonymity in the data (eg. Emails)? ● Are team members really interested to 'see' and know what their colleagues are ● doing? Is ontology based folksonomics the right way to go to provide collaborative platforms? ● Experience from http://www.osor.eu/ Thanks a lot for your attention Questions & Comments /10/ Annals of Knowledge Sharing in Distributed Software Development Environments: Experience from Open Source Software Projects By SKSowe

    + Hans-Joerg HappelHans-Joerg Happel, 8 months ago

    custom

    610 views, 0 favs, 0 embeds more stats

    "Annals of Knowledge Sharing in Distributed Softwar more

    More info about this document

    © All Rights Reserved

    Go to text version

    • Total Views 610
      • 610 on SlideShare
      • 0 from embeds
    • Comments 0
    • Favorites 0
    • Downloads 6
    Most viewed embeds

    more

    All embeds

    less

    Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
    Flag as inappropriate

    Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate. If needed, use the feedback form to let us know more details.

    Cancel
    File a copyright complaint
    Having problems? Go to our helpdesk?

    Categories