Civil society action in the field of heritage in Europe: strengths and weaknesses (Annick Schramme) - Presentation Transcript
Civil Society action in the field of heritage in Europe: strenghts and weaknesses Prof. dr. Annick Schramme
19 th century: space between state and family (Hegel)
20 th century: space between state, market and family
What is civil society?
Kaldor (2003) ‘ The process through which individuals negotiate, argue, struggle against or agree with each other and with the centres of political and economical authority. Through voluntary associations, movements, parties, unions, the individual is able to act publicly’ .
What is civil society?
The civil society, state and market are not seperated fields, but are overlapping each other (Iris Marion Young, 2000)
activities are processes coordinated on different manners
The autonomy of civil society
more than a passive transfer point
Civil society mediates
functions: service providing, education and awareness rising, promotion of interest/advocate (Huyse, 2001)
Functions of civil society
a new international playing field for civil society
more need to provide feedback to citizens
multilevel governance model
Civil society and globalisation
What are the underlying assumptions behind the conjunction European cultural heritage
It often serves a purpose, a political programme
Cultural heritage and Europe
Heritage is a cultural and political concept inseparable from the history of the nation state and the emerge of ‘national cultures’.
Gellner: cultural identification is crucial to the nation building process
Cultural heritage and Europe
Cultural heritage and Europe
The idea of a ‘Common European cultural heritage’ after World War II
context of cooperation and peacekeeping
European identity as an important condition of economic and political integration
A widespread apathy to the European project and the notorious ‘democratic deficit’ ---> Declaration concerning European Identity in 1973
1983: Solemn declaration of EU extented EC cooperation to culture: ‘ in order to affirm the awareness of a common cultural heritage as an element in de European identity’ .
Cultural Heritage and European Identity
The EU Maastricht Treaty (1992, article 128)
§1.‘ The community shall contribute to the flowering of the cultures of the Member States, while respecting their national and regional diversity and at the same time bringing the common cultural heritage to the fore’
Unity or diversity?
Council of Europe
Since foundation in 1949 an interest in the cultural dimension of Europe.
1999: campaign: ‘Europe: a Common Heritage’
Council of Europe related cultural Heritage with democracy and democratic values
Benjamin Barber, 2003 and Carole Rosenstein, 2006
Framework Convention of the Council of Europe on the Value of Cultural Heritage for Society
new concept of ‘heritage community’
new opportunities
Faro Convention (CoE, 2005)
‘ a group of resources inherited from the past which peaple identify, independly of ownership, as a reflection and expression of their constantly evolving values, beliefs, knowledge and traditions. It includes all aspects of the environment resulting from interaction between people and places through time.’
Definition of heritage communities
bounding factor is not political but cultural
imagined communities become intentional communities
purpose: to create cross-border communities
heritage as a whole
fits with the political agenda of intercultural dialogue
Faro Convention (CoE, 2005)
17 october 2003: Unesco Convention for the safeguarding of the Intangible Cultural Heritage
20 october 2005: Unesco Convention on the Protection and Promotion of the Diversity of Cultural Expressions
Unesco and cultural heritage
articles 2.1, 11, 12, 13 and 15 of the Unesco Convention Intangible Cultural Heritage
articles 11 and 12 of the Faro Convention
--> broadest possible participation of groups, communities and individuals
Civil society action and cultural heritage in Europe
Civil society action and cultural heritage in Europe
Structured dialogue in cultural policy still in their infancy
subsidiarity principle
some programmes, like Culture 2007-2013
no issue for the European Parliament
negative impact of the European legislation on the heritage sector
Weaknesses of the civil society action in cultural heritage
Focus on local cultural heritage
lack of global thinking
less organised then the Arts Sector
fragmentation
tension between tangible and intangible heritage
A few networks
Europa Nostra (1963)
EFAH (1992) became ‘Culture Action Europe’(2008)
The European Heritage Network (CoE, 1999)
Observatory for EU legislation (2006)
Inventory of Heritage Organisations (>2008)
The treaty of Lisbon, article 11 (art. 4, EC): will recognise dialogue with civil society as a fundamental principle of European Unions Governance.
2007: Agenda for Culture: three domains
cultural diversity and intercultural dialogue
creativity
culture as a part of an European foreign policy
Europe and the civil society dialogue
mobilisation of a large variety of actors (including ‘the hard to reach’)
a dynamic exchange of information and dialogue within the sector
the development of a specific expertise about the actors
knowledge of the needs of the field
‘ Civil society: making it work better’ (2006)
a real form of dialogue between stakeholders and policy makers:
end goal: better public policy making
not to legitimize decisions already taken
openness, transparency and the commitment to engage with the sector at all stages of the policy process
open method of coordination
‘ Civil society: making it work better’ (2006)
Cultural heritage is flourishing
broader concept of heritage
new approach of the Faro Convention (2005) that leads cultural heritage organizations to work in highly diverse, cross-sectoral ways
Conclusions
a real opportunity to participate more actively
make sure that all actors of the European heritage sector have the opportunity to take part in European debates
It has to happen all across Europe, not only in ‘Brussels’
0 comments
Post a comment