Current status and future challenges in mastitis research

3,353 views
3,209 views

Published on

A couple of years ago, we gathered with 9 individual mastitis experts, to freely discuss issues around mastitis.
One of the results was an overview paper on the current status and future challenges of mastitis research. It was presented at the 50th anniversary Annual Meeting of the NMC (www.nmconline.org). These are the slides of this presentation, given by Joe Hogan and myself.

Published in: Education
4 Comments
6 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • An instrumental presentation, thanks Dr Henk Hogeveen
       Reply 
    Are you sure you want to  Yes  No
    Your message goes here
  • Specificity for diagnosis is indeed important. With Ekomilk digital cell counters, a high specificity (few false positives) with good sensitivity is guaranteed at approx. 0.04$/test with an optional mastitis monitoring app per quarter, per cow/udder and for the herd. www.ekomilk.eu . SCC still is one of the most reliable and widely accepted indicators for mastitis (udder health), both for clinical and subclinical cases.
       Reply 
    Are you sure you want to  Yes  No
    Your message goes here
  • dear collegues ,
    thanks for all researchs that your show in this site NMC, and Linkedin too.
    I thinlk this is the best web site in order to comunícate our comments and suggest.
    for example ,
    we are working here in Chile with a new ,amazing product for use on the skin ( like teat dip).this product is bases to copper salt , the research in going to from U.OF CHILE,INTA, institute. the leader of this research is profesor :Guillermo Figueroa.
       Reply 
    Are you sure you want to  Yes  No
    Your message goes here
  • Thanx Dr. Henk, brief and very informative presentation.
       Reply 
    Are you sure you want to  Yes  No
    Your message goes here
No Downloads
Views
Total views
3,353
On SlideShare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
2
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
258
Comments
4
Likes
6
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide
  • I added this OIE reference as it seems that not all know about this. Practically all countries are OIE members so in principle this should be binding….And it is said there that antibiotic use should be targeted if possible. The flow chart shows simply how this goes in practice, e.g. in herd protocols.
  • I like this. All this tube business is more or less bluff, and we should finally admit that. Worse that they cause more selection pressure than narrow-spectrum ones.
  • This is one detail, quite important but can be left out if there is no time.
  • Conclusions, from future chapter.
  • Score 3-4  1.5 x vaker major pathogen
  • Spenen staan in contact met de melkmachine via de tepelvoering: dat is het enige directe contact tussen koe en machine en is dus van groot belang!
  • Score 3-4  1.5 x vaker major pathogen
  • Uiteindelijk komt het allemaal neer op de speenpunt: het slotgat is het allerbelangrijkste onderdeel van de afweer van de koe tegen mastitiskiemen. Een koe met een beschadigd slotgat krijgt vrijwel zeker mastitis: de eerste lijn van afweer is verstoord. En juist dat slotgat staat onder druk tijdens het melken en proberen we te beschermen door goed te melken en te desinfecteren, zoals inde voorgaande plaatjes aangegeven.
  • Reiniging: (vrij) chloor en zeer hoge temperaturen ( > 80 graden) tasten rubber aan : haarscheurtjes (Cracking) Bij hard water ook meer slijtage (  aanslag op oppervlak)
  • Onderzoek bij 170 ‘random’ melkveehouders: Bijna de helft vervangt tepelvoeringen standaard om 12 maanden: zeer waarschijnlij k uit gewoonte en niet omdat 12 maanden de optimale tijd is: dat is namelijk bijna nooit zo (zie tabel vorige plaatje)
  • Gegevens uit diezelfde data-set: frequentie verangen rubber tepelvoeringen op 170 bedrijven
  • Current status and future challenges in mastitis research

    1. 1. Current Status and Future Challenges in Mastitis Research Henk Hogeveen Joe Hogan
    2. 2. This mastitis forum <ul><li>Eric Hillerton </li></ul><ul><li>Henk Hogeveen </li></ul><ul><li>Herman Barkema </li></ul><ul><li>Joe Hogan </li></ul><ul><li>Karin Persson Waller </li></ul><ul><li>Satu Pyorala </li></ul><ul><li>Steve Oliver </li></ul><ul><li>Theo Lam </li></ul><ul><li>Ynte Schukken </li></ul>
    3. 3. Topics <ul><li>Current status </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Pathogens </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Diagnosis </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Immunology </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Therapy </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Environment </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Milking equipment </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Management </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Socio-economic </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Wrapping up </li></ul>
    4. 4. <ul><li>Etiological agents </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Countries, regions, farms </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Stage of lactation </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Seasons </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Evolve </li></ul></ul>Pathogens
    5. 5. <ul><li>Staphylococci </li></ul><ul><li>Staph aureus </li></ul><ul><ul><li>strain diversity </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>related genotypes within herd </li></ul></ul>Pathogens Photo: SVA, Uppsala
    6. 6. <ul><ul><li>CNS - increasing interest in many countries </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Multiple species and strains </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Dfferential diagnostics </li></ul></ul></ul>Pathogens
    7. 7. <ul><li>Streptococci </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Strep agalactiae </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>still concern in some countries </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>genotypes between human and bovine isolates </li></ul></ul></ul>Pathogens Photo: SVA, Uppsala
    8. 8. <ul><ul><li>Strep dysgalactiae </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>(environmental/contagious) </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>fresh heifers </li></ul></ul></ul>Pathogens
    9. 9. <ul><ul><li>Strep uberis </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>housed and pastured systems </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>strain differences </li></ul></ul></ul>Pathogens
    10. 10. <ul><li>Coliforms </li></ul><ul><ul><li>severity = host response </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>genetically heterogenous group </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>mild to severe </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>acute to chronic </li></ul></ul></ul>Pathogens Photo: SVA, Uppsala
    11. 11. <ul><li>Pathogenesis </li></ul><ul><ul><li>bacteria and host </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Epidemiology & Ecology </li></ul><ul><ul><li>genotype and environment </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Emergence of ”new and old” pathogens </li></ul>Future challenges - Pathogens
    12. 12. Topics <ul><li>Current status </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Pathogens </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Diagnosis </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Immunology </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Therapy </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Environment </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Milking equipment </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Management </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Socio-economic </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Wrapping up </li></ul>
    13. 13. <ul><li>Bacteriological culture </li></ul><ul><li>Somatic cell counts </li></ul><ul><li>Soluble indicators of inflammation </li></ul>Diagnostics
    14. 14. <ul><li>Sample collection </li></ul><ul><li>Sample handling </li></ul><ul><li>Laboratory techniques </li></ul><ul><li>Interpretation </li></ul>Standardization
    15. 15. <ul><li>Precision on antibiotic selection </li></ul><ul><li>Low specificity = false-positives </li></ul>On Farm Diagnostics
    16. 16. <ul><li>Detection of genes </li></ul><ul><li>ID organism </li></ul><ul><li>Identify virulence factors </li></ul><ul><li>Clonal variance </li></ul>PCR
    17. 17. <ul><li>Simple low-cost </li></ul><ul><li>Rapid on farm </li></ul><ul><li>RT Interpretation - Implementation </li></ul>Future Challenges – Diagnostics
    18. 18. Topics <ul><li>Current status </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Pathogens </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Diagnosis </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Immunology </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Therapy </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Environment </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Milking equipment </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Management </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Socio-economic </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Wrapping up </li></ul>
    19. 19. Host Defense
    20. 20. <ul><ul><li>SOL </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Breed </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Genotype </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Age </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Milk yield </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Nutrition </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Existing infection </li></ul></ul>Host defense
    21. 21. <ul><li>Teat Canal </li></ul><ul><li>Phagocytic Cells </li></ul><ul><li>Soluble factors </li></ul>Innate Immunity
    22. 22. <ul><li>Macrophages/monocytes </li></ul><ul><li>Lymphocytes </li></ul><ul><li>Antibodies </li></ul>Acquired Immunity
    23. 23. <ul><li>Cytokines </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Recruit </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Class switch </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Activate </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Up regulate/down regulate </li></ul></ul>Bridge Between
    24. 24. <ul><li>Whole cell bacterins </li></ul><ul><li>Subunit vaccines </li></ul><ul><li>Adjuvants </li></ul><ul><li>Route </li></ul>Vaccination
    25. 25. <ul><li>Vaccine </li></ul><ul><li>Virulence factors </li></ul><ul><li>Genotyping </li></ul><ul><li>Environmental factors </li></ul>Future Challenges – Host Defense
    26. 26. Topics <ul><li>Current status </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Pathogens </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Diagnosis </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Immunology </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Therapy </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Environment </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Milking equipment </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Management </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Socio-economic </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Wrapping up </li></ul>
    27. 27. <ul><li>Eliminate IMI </li></ul><ul><li>Prudent use of antimicrobials </li></ul><ul><li>Welfare of animal </li></ul>Therapy
    28. 28. Treatment should be targeted towards the causing pathogen OIE World Organisation for Animal Health Terrestrial Animal Health Code GUIDELINES FOR THE RESPONSIBLE AND PRUDENT USE OF ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS IN VETERINARY MEDICINE
    29. 29. Broad-spectrum antibiotics <ul><li>Prudent? </li></ul><ul><li>Efficacious? </li></ul>
    30. 30. <ul><li>The longer, the better? </li></ul><ul><li>Efficacy of longer treatment is available in: </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Staphylococcus aureus </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Streptococcus uberis </li></ul></ul>Duration of Treatment
    31. 31. <ul><li>What is long? </li></ul><ul><li>Very few comparative trials </li></ul><ul><li>> 5 days may seldom be economical </li></ul>Duration of Treatment
    32. 32. <ul><li>Pharmacokinetics </li></ul><ul><li>Route and duration </li></ul><ul><li>Antimicrobial resistance </li></ul><ul><li>Economical benefits </li></ul><ul><li>Alternatives to antibiotics </li></ul>Future challenges - treatment
    33. 33. Topics <ul><li>Current status </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Pathogens </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Diagnosis </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Immunology </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Therapy </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Environment </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Milking equipment </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Management </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Socio-economic </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Wrapping up </li></ul>
    34. 34. <ul><li>Biological </li></ul><ul><li>Physical </li></ul><ul><li>Chemical </li></ul>Environment
    35. 35. <ul><li>Fecal contamination </li></ul><ul><li>Moisture </li></ul><ul><li>Organic matter </li></ul>Reduce Exposure to Pathogens
    36. 36. Exposure = Density <ul><li>Confinement </li></ul><ul><li>Pasture </li></ul>
    37. 37. Exposure vs Susceptibility
    38. 38. Future Challenges – Environment <ul><li>$ $$$$$ </li></ul><ul><li>Waste/Recycle </li></ul><ul><li>Ecology/Image </li></ul><ul><li>Welfare </li></ul>
    39. 39. Topics <ul><li>Current status </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Pathogens </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Diagnosis </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Immunology </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Therapy </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Environment </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Milking equipment </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Management </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Socio-economic </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Wrapping up </li></ul>
    40. 41. <ul><li>Acts as a vector to transfer pathogens </li></ul><ul><li>Damages the first line of udder defence </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Teat </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Canal </li></ul></ul>Role of machine milking in udder health
    41. 42. Cyclic and irregular vacuum fluctuations
    42. 43. Claw volume increased to 116 ml -9% Small milk tube bore increased to 11 mm -16% Add smt air bleeds (0.57 mm) -18% Long pulse tube restrictor (3 mm) -19% Change to alternate pulsation -20% COMBINED EFFECT -84% Key changes in machine milking affecting cyclic fluctuations
    43. 44. Knowledge on irregular vacuum fluctuations <ul><li>Blocked air bleeds </li></ul><ul><li>Low reserve </li></ul><ul><li>Excessive losses </li></ul><ul><li>Ineffective regulator </li></ul><ul><li>Liner slip </li></ul><ul><li>Cluster attachment </li></ul><ul><li>Cluster removal </li></ul><ul><li>ALL AFFECT VACUUM STABILITY AND BACTERIAL TRANSFER </li></ul>
    44. 45. Milk flow
    45. 46. Milk flow Bad Good
    46. 47. Completeness of milking Effect on teat color Effect of liner age Liner surface 0 milkings 4000 milkings
    47. 48. h Teat condition and overmilking 2 min 5 min 0 min 0 min 5 min 2 min
    48. 49. Heifers Cows Flow rate (ml/min) 200 400 200 400 Machine-on time (min) 5.5 5.0 7.9 7.4 Yield (kg) 21.1 21.2 31.5 31.6 Teat score 1.3 1.0 1.7 1.1 New infections, % cows 16 15 15 15 From MD Rasmussen Effect of ACR setting
    49. 50. Peri-harvest diagnosis <ul><li>Precision dairy farming </li></ul><ul><li>Milk harvesting technology </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Parlor performance </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>In-line/on-line detection of udder inflammation </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Other diseases </li></ul></ul><ul><li>5 robots: 2 prep, 2 attach, 1 post-spray </li></ul><ul><li>http:// www.youtube.com/watch?v =--e_AOeOC4s </li></ul>
    50. 51. In-line/on-line diagnostics <ul><li>Small amount of milk is immediately diverted into diagnostic device: </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Milk meters: milk weight, conductivity, temperature. </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Diagnostic systems: </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Light scattering (fat, protein, lactose, SCC) </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Bio-sensors (LDH, progesteron, BHBA </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Electronic tongue </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Thermal camera </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Light diffusion (color) </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Capilary activity (CMT-like, SCC) </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>…… </li></ul></ul></ul>
    51. 52. Future challenges – machine milking <ul><li>Target </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Swift and complete removal of milk </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Remain the integrity of milk and health of teat </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Integrate sensors </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Without disrupting milking process </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Properly evaluated functioning (also economic) </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Associated “new” management </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Further automation </li></ul><ul><li>Managing the teat canal </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Teat closure </li></ul></ul>
    52. 53. Topics <ul><li>Current status </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Pathogens </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Diagnosis </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Immunology </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Therapy </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Environment </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Milking equipment </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Management </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Socio-economic </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Wrapping up </li></ul>
    53. 54. <ul><ul><li>Dry cow antibiotics </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Post milking teat disinfection </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Milking and milking machine </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Clinical mastitis cases </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Chronically infected cows </li></ul></ul>Basis for numerous on farm udder health programs Have shown to be effective The 5-point plan on contagious mastitis
    54. 55. Sampimon et al., 2009 Dutch prevalence studies
    55. 56. <ul><li>establishment of goals for udder health </li></ul><ul><li>maintenance of clean, comfortable environment </li></ul><ul><li>proper milking procedures </li></ul><ul><li>proper maintenance and use of milking equipment </li></ul><ul><li>good record keeping </li></ul><ul><li>appropriate management of clinical mastitis during lactation </li></ul><ul><li>effective dry cow management </li></ul><ul><li>maintenance of biosecurity for contagious pathogens and culling of chronically infected cows </li></ul><ul><li>regular monitoring of udder health status </li></ul><ul><li>periodic review of mastitis control program </li></ul>The 10 point plan
    56. 57. Contagious mastitis Environmental mastitis Infectious pressure Zadoks, 2002
    57. 58. % score 3 and 4 % score 3 and 4 % new infections BMSCC Hygiene and udder health Schreiner and Ruegg, 2003
    58. 59. Prevent other contact with the milking machine
    59. 60. More than taking measures <ul><li>Evaluation </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Udder health </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>BMSCC </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Incidence rate clinical mastitis </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Cows with high SCC </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>… .. </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Intermediate factors </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Udder hygiene </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Teat condition </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>… . </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Tools are available </li></ul></ul>
    60. 62. Teat scoring strategy
    61. 63. <ul><li>Straightforward management: </li></ul><ul><li>replace after 2500 milkings </li></ul><ul><li>- What are farmers doing? </li></ul>Remember the liners …
    62. 64. Frequency liner replacement Olde Riekerink and Sampimon, 2008
    63. 65. Number of herds 70% Milkings before replacement
    64. 66. Future challenges – Management <ul><li>(Further) develop management measures and tools </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Applicable for a variety of modern dairy farmers </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Straightforward </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Use of technology (precision dairy farming) </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Estimate effect of management measures (“clinical trials”) </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Give advisor arguments to “sell” improved management </li></ul></ul>
    65. 67. Topics <ul><li>Current status </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Pathogens </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Diagnosis </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Immunology </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Therapy </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Environment </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Milking equipment </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Management </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Socio-economics </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Wrapping up </li></ul>
    66. 68. Literature (€) 1€ = 1.27$US Bar 2008 Halasa 2009 Hagnestam-Nielsen 2009 Huijps 2008 Level Cow Cow Cow-year Cow Milk production losses - 11 78 36 Labour - 11 - 4 Treatment - 14 - 15 Culling - 46 - 22 Death - 0 - 0 Veterinarian - 2 - 1 Milk quality - 0 - 0 Materials - 0 - 0 Diagnostics - 0 - 0 Total 61 84 97 78
    67. 69. Mastitis costs money <ul><li>Estimations: $US 77 – 123 /cow/year </li></ul><ul><li>Variation between farms: </li></ul><ul><ul><li>The Netherlands: $US 99 -195 </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>US: $US 45 – 620 </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Farmers attitude: </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Know mastitis = $$$$ </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Underestimate the costs </li></ul></ul>
    68. 70. Specific studies on treatment specifically subclinical mastitis <ul><li>Streptococci: € 12/treatment (Swinkels et al., 2005a) </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Partial budget model R = 0.21 </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Staphylococci: - € 21/treatment (Swinkels et al., 2005b) </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Partial budget model R = 0.32 </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Streptococci: - € 11/treatment (Steeneveld et al., 2007) </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Stochastic model </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Gram positive: € 2,601/100 cows (Van den Borne et al., 2010) </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Stochastic dynamic model </li></ul></ul>
    69. 71. Additional expenditures Reduced losses Net benefit Milk cows with clinical mastitis last 37 16 -21 Milk cows with subclinical mastitis last 104 20 -84 Use of separate cloths during udder preparation 26 9 -17 Wash dirty udders during udder preparation 3 9 6 Prestripping 34 9 -25 Use of milkers’ gloves during milking 1 9 8 Post milking teat disinfection 31 31 -0 Back-flushing clusters after milking a cow with clinical mastitis 1 11 10 Back-flushing clusters after milking a cow with subclinical mastitis 123 15 -108 Replace teat cup liners in time 13 11 -2 Use of a treatment protocol 7 15 8 Application of blanket dry cow therapy 9 36 27 Keep cows standing after milking 2 12 10 Feed additional dry cow minerals 13 13 0 Prevent overcrowding 23 13 -10 Clean boxes 54 15 -39 Clean yards 51 8 -43 Optimize feed ration 24 13 -11
    70. 72. Money is not the only motivator Theory of planned behaviour … ..and there are lots of other frameworks There is an intention-behaviour discrepancy among farmers
    71. 73. Future challenges – socio economics <ul><li>Cost calculations at chain level </li></ul><ul><ul><li>More than accumulation of individual farms </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>What are economic consequences of a loss of image </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Cost-effectiveness of management </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Lack of clinical trials </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Effect of measure depends on assumptions (dynamics) </li></ul></ul><ul><li>More insight in motivating farmers </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Bringing the message </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Money </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Other factors </li></ul></ul>
    72. 75. Topics <ul><li>Current status </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Pathogens </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Diagnosis </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Immunology </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Therapy </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Environment </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Milking equipment </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Management </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Socio-economics </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Wrapping up </li></ul>
    73. 76. Reality in developed countries <ul><li>The ‘consumer’ demand: </li></ul><ul><ul><li>A safe healthy product </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Healthy happy cows </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Environmental friendly </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Government (politicians) demands: </li></ul><ul><ul><li>No risk for humans </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Human medicine demands: </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Decrease of antibiotics and hormones in cattle </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Deal with (potential) zoonotic diseases </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Business behavior results in an increase in herd size </li></ul>
    74. 77. Consequences <ul><li>Consumers “in the barn” </li></ul><ul><li>Restrictive use of antibiotics and hormones </li></ul><ul><li>Change in definition of “Quality” </li></ul><ul><li>More organic farms </li></ul><ul><li>Control of zoonotic disease requires </li></ul><ul><li>Changed farming systems </li></ul>
    75. 78. So … <ul><li>Mastitis was and remains: </li></ul><ul><ul><li>A production (economic) disease </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>A welfare burden </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Mastitis is becoming: </li></ul><ul><ul><li>An image issue </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>A sustainability issue </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>(less mastitis -> less culling -> less youngstock raising -> less greenhouse gas emissions etc. </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><li>Of increased importance </li></ul>
    76. 79. Finally <ul><li>We’ve come from far, we’ve done a lot </li></ul><ul><li>There are many challenges ahead of us </li></ul>We acknowledge the Dutch dairy industry for initiating this mastitis forum

    ×