Upcoming SlideShare
×

# Vlsiphysicaldesignautomationonpartitioning 120219012744-phpapp01

271 views

Published on

Published in: Education, Technology, Design
1 Like
Statistics
Notes
• Full Name
Comment goes here.

Are you sure you want to Yes No
• Be the first to comment

Views
Total views
271
On SlideShare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
2
Actions
Shares
0
9
0
Likes
1
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide
• Maximum difference between partition sizes is usually specified as a percentage. For example, if 5% is the maximum allowable imbalance, then a partition cannot have more than 55% of the vertices (or sum of vertex weights) in a 2-way partitioning solutionWhat does cutsize mean?It refers to the number (sum of weights) of the edges that are “cut”, i.e., connect two vertices from two different partitions
• ### Vlsiphysicaldesignautomationonpartitioning 120219012744-phpapp01

1. 1. VLSI Physical Design Automation Introduction , partitioning Hemant kumar Roll No: 2910207 Cont no. 09992440824 Dept. of Electronics & Communication Engg., KITM, KURUKSHETRA.
2. 2. • VLSI CAD (also known as EDA – electronic design automation) students, in particular for chip implementation (physical design) • Circuit designers to understand how tools work behind the scene • Process engineers to tune process that is more circuit/physical design friendly • Mathematical/Computer Science majors who want to find tough problems to solve – Lots of VLSI physical design problems can be formulated into combinatorial optimization or mathematical programming problems. – Actually, most CAD problems are NP-complete -> heuristics Intended Audience
3. 3. Objective of this Lecture To review the materials used in fabrication of VLSI devices. To review the structure of devices and process involved in fabricating different types of VLSI circuits. To review the basic algorithm concepts.  Understand the process of VLSI layout design.  Study the basic algorithms used in layout design of VLSI circuits.  Learn about the physical design automation techniques used in the best-known academic and commercial layout systems.
4. 4. Physical Design • Converts a circuit description into a geometric description. – This description is used for fabrication of the chip. • Basic steps in the physical design cycle: 1. Partitioning 2. Floorplanning 3. placement 4. Routing 5. Compaction
5. 5. 6 System Level Partitioning Board Level Partitioning Chip Level Partitioning System PCBs Chips Subcircuits / Blocks So, what is Partitioning?
6. 6. 7 Why partition ? • Ask Lord Curzon  – The most effective way to solve problems of high complexity : Parallel CAD Development • System-level partitioning for multi-chip designs – Inter-chip interconnection delay dominates system performance • IO Pin Limitation • In deep-submicron designs, partitioning defines local and global interconnect, and has significant impact on circuit performance
7. 7. Importance of Circuit Partitioning  Divide-and-conquer methodology  The most effective way to solve problems of high complexity E.g.: min-cut based placement, partitioning-based test generation,…  System-level partitioning for multi-chip designs inter-chip interconnection delay dominates system performance.  Circuit emulation/parallel simulation partition large circuit into multiple FPGAs (e.g. Quickturn), or multiple special-purpose processors (e.g. Zycad).  Parallel CAD development Task decomposition and load balancing  In deep-submicron designs, partitioning defines local and global interconnect, and has significant impact on circuit performance …… ……
8. 8. 9 Objectives • Since each partition can correspond to a chip, interesting objectives are: – Minimum number of partitions • Subject to maximum size (area) of each partition – Minimum number of interconnections between partitions • Since they correspond to off-chip wiring with more delay and less reliability • Less pin count on ICs (larger IO pins, much higher packaging cost) – Balanced partitioning given bound for area of each partition
9. 9. Partitioning: Partitioning is the task of dividing a circuit into smaller parts . The objective is to partition the circuit into parts, so that the size of each component is within prescribed ranges and the number of connections between the components is minimized . Different ways to partition correspond to different circuit implementations . Therefore, a good partitioning can significantly improve circuit performance and reduce layout costs . • Decomposition of a complex system into smaller subsystems – Done hierarchically – Partitioning done until each subsystem has manageable size – Each subsystem can be designed independently • Interconnections between partitions minimized – Less hassle interfacing the subsystems – Communication between subsystems usually costly
10. 10. Partitioning of a Circuit Input size: 48 Cut 1=4 Size 1=15 Cut 2=4 Size 2=16 Size 3=17
11. 11. Hierarcahical Partitioning • Levels of partitioning: – System-level partitioning: Each sub-system can be designed as a single PCB – Board-level partitioning: Circuit assigned to a PCB is partitioned into sub-circuits each fabricated as a VLSI chip – Chip-level partitioning: Circuit assigned to the chip is divided into manageable sub- circuits NOTE: physically not necessary
12. 12. 13 Delay at Different Levels of Partitions A B C PCB1 D x 10x 20x PCB2
13. 13. 14 Partitioning: Formal Definition • Input: – Graph or hypergraph – Usually with vertex weights – Usually weighted edges • Constraints – Number of partitions (K-way partitioning) – Maximum capacity of each partition OR maximum allowable difference between partitions • Objective – Assign nodes to partitions subject to constraints s.t. the cutsize is minimized • Tractability - Is NP-complete 
14. 14. Circuit Representation • Netlist: – Gates:A, B, C, D – Nets: {A,B,C}, {B,D}, {C,D} • Hypergraph: – Vertices: A, B, C, D – Hyperedges: {A,B,C}, {B,D}, {C,D} – Vertex label: Gate size/area – Hyperedge label: Importance of net (weight) A B C D A B C D
15. 15. 16 Circuit Partitioning: Formulation Bi-partitioning formulation: Minimize interconnections between partitions • Minimum cut: min c(x, x’) • minimum bisection: min c(x, x’) with |x|= |x’| • minimum ratio-cut: min c(x, x’) / |x||x’| X X’ c(X,X’)
16. 16. 17 A Bi-Partitioning Example Min-cut size=13 Min-Bisection size = 300 Min-ratio-cut size= 19 a b c e d f mini-ratio-cut min-bisection min-cut 9 10 100 100 100 100100 100 4 Ratio-cut helps to identify natural clusters
17. 17. 18 Iterative Partitioning Algorithms • Greedy iterative improvement method (Deterministic) – [Kernighan-Lin 1970] • Simulated Annealing (Non-Deterministic)
18. 18. 19 Restricted Partition Problem • Restrictions: – For Bisectioning of circuit – Assume all gates are of the same size – Works only for 2-terminal nets • If all nets are 2-terminal, hypergraph  graph a b c d Hypergraph Representation Graph Representation a b c d
19. 19. 20 Problem Formulation • Input: A graph with – Set verticesV (|V| = 2n) – Set of edges E (|E| = m) – Cost cAB for each edge {A, B} in E • Output: 2 partitions X &Y such that – Total cost of edge cuts is minimized – Each partition has n vertices • This problem is NP-Complete!!!!!
20. 20. 21 A Trivial Approach • Try all possible bisections and find the best one • If there are 2n vertices, # of possibilities = (2n)! / n!2 = nO(n) • For 4 vertices (a,b,c,d), 3 possibilities 1. X={a,b} & Y={c,d} 2. X={a,c} & Y={b,d} 3. X={a,d} & Y={b,c} • For 100 vertices, 5x1028 possibilities • Need 1.59x1013 years if one can try 100M possbilities per second
21. 21. Definitions • Definition 1: Consider any node a in block X. The contribution of node a to the cutset is called the external cost of a and is denoted as Ea, where Ea =Σcav (for all v in Y) • Definition 2: The internal cost Ia of node a in X is defined as follows: Ia =Σcav (for all v in X)
22. 22. Example • External cost (connection) Ea = 2 • Internal cost Ia = 1 a b c d X Y
23. 23. Idea of KL Algorithm • Da = Decrease in cut value if moving a = Ea-Ia – Moving node a from block X to block Y would decrease the value of the cutset by Ea and increase it by Ia a b c d X Y a b c d X Y Da = 2-1 = 1 Db = 1-1 = 0
24. 24. Idea of KL Algorithm • Note that we want to balance two partitions • If switch A & B, gain(A,B) = DA+DB-2cAB – cAB : edge cost for AB A B C D X Y A B C D X Y gain(A,B) = 1+0-2 = -1
25. 25. • Start with any initial legal partitions X and Y • A pass (exchanging each vertex exactly once) is described below: 1. For i := 1 to n do From the unlocked (unexchanged) vertices, choose a pair (A,B) s.t. gain(A,B) is largest Exchange A and B. Lock A and B. Let gi = gain(A,B) 2. Find the k s.t. G=g1+...+gk is maximized 3. Switch the first k pairs • Repeat the pass until there is no improvement (G=0) Idea of KL Algorithm
26. 26. Example 1 X 2 3 4 5 6 Y Original CutValue = 9 4 X 2 3 1 5 6 Y Optimal CutValue = 5 A good step-by-step example in SY book
27. 27. Time Complexity of KL • For each pass, – O(n2) time to find the best pair to exchange. – n pairs exchanged. – Total time is O(n3) per pass. • Better implementation can get O(n2log n) time per pass. • Number of passes is usually small.
28. 28. Recap of Kernighan-Lin’s Algorithm  Pair-wise exchange of nodes to reduce cut size  Allow cut size to increase temporarily within a pass Compute the gain of a swap Repeat Perform a feasible swap of max gain Mark swapped nodes “locked”; Update swap gains; Until no feasible swap; Find max prefix partial sum in gain sequence g1, g2, …, gm Make corresponding swaps permanent.  Start another pass if current pass reduces the cut size (usually converge after a few passes) u v a v u locked
29. 29. Other Partitioning Methods • KL and FM have each held up very well • Min-cut / max-flow algorithms –Ford-Fulkerson – for unconstrained partitions • Ratio cut • Genetic algorithm • Simulated annealing
30. 30. References and Copyright  Textbooks referred (none required)  [Mic94] G. De Micheli “Synthesis and Optimization of Digital Circuits” McGraw-Hill, 1994.  [CLR90] T. H. Cormen, C. E. Leiserson, R. L. Rivest “Introduction to Algorithms” MIT Press, 1990.  [Sar96] M. Sarrafzadeh, C. K. Wong “An Introduction to VLSI Physical Design” McGraw-Hill, 1996.  [She99] N. Sherwani “Algorithms For VLSI Physical Design Automation” Kluwer Academic Publishers, 3rd edition, 1999.
31. 31. THANK YOU