The Integration Of Technology Into Institutional Corporate Strategy - Presentation Transcript
The integration of technology into institutional corporate strategy A study for the JISC and the Leadership Foundation for Higher Education by Duke & Jordan Ltd with Bob Powell
Purpose of Study
Identification of the issues and development needs relating to the integration of technology into institutional strategies in UK higher education
Examination of
awareness
current practices
potential benefit
Who we interviewed– 1 England NI Scotland Wales Grand Total Governor 1 1 2 SMT 9 2 1 2 14 Planning Officer 4 1 1 6 Head of ICT 13 1 4 2 20 Other 6 1 7 Grand Total 33 5 7 4 49
Who we interviewed – 2 England NI Scotland Wales Grand Total Non Educational org 2 1 3 Other HE organisation 6 1 7 Non Uni HEI 1 2 3 Post 92 Uni 1 2 3 92 Uni 5 2 7 Pre-92 uni 12 2 3 17 Russell Uni 6 1 2 9 Grand Total 33 5 7 4 49
Split of HEIs interviewed England NI Scotland Wales Grand Total Non Uni HEI 1 1 2 Post 92 Uni 1 1 2 92 Uni 5 1 6 Pre-92 uni 6 1 2 9 Russell Uni 4 1 1 6 Grand Total 17 2 4 2 25
Essence of questions to institutional players
How does your institutional strategy development process work? How are any conflicts resolved?
How does technology currently contribute to delivering your institutional key strategic imperatives in Teaching and Learning, Research, Administration and other activities
How does your institution know where and how technology can make a significant contribution to institutional strategy?
How well do you think that your institutional strategy development succeeds in integrating consideration of technology? How would you improve it?
The role of technology
Technology can be
Transformational
ie radical change of the institution
A strategic enabler
The strategy cannot be achieved without technology
An operational enabler
Technology used to deliver but not critical
Strategy Development – Integrated Model CEO SMT University Committees. Academic Units Vision Draft strategy Governors Final strategy Approval Implementation Head of ICT and IS Policy Committee
Corporate Strategy Development – Disjoint Model CEO SMT University Committees. Academic Units Vision Governors Final strategy Approval Implementation Draft strategy
Technology Strategy Development – Disjoint Model CEO SMT University Committees. Academic Units Vision Draft strategy Governors Final strategy Approval Implementation Head of ICT and IS Policy Committee Implementation Draft strategy Draft technology strategy Final technology strategy
Five Examples
1 small HEI
2 1992 HEIs
One pre-1992 HEI
One Russell Group HEI
Example - Institution A
Coherent long term corporate vision of institution
Technology at the core of university-wide change
Structure of roles to develop and deliver strategy
Considerable autonomy in Schools
Currently have a separate IS strategy
Last time for this
Example - Institution B
No technology strategy felt to be needed
Enterprise architecture approach within institutional strategy
Cascades down to technology
Open senior management team
No specific IT skills within SMT
But involvement of several members in technology management
Example - Institution C
Small vocationally-focussed institution
Integrated model
Technology seen as a strategic enabler
CEO and Deputy CEO technology literate
Management team tasked to deliver strategy
Consultation around How ? rather than What ?
Innovation + partnership in technology as key element of success
Example - Institution D
Vision and top level strategy
developed by SMT
Rolling approach
roughly one area of strategy updated annually
ICT seen as strategic enabler
One strategy component is devoted to ICT
Example - Institution E
Very long term corporate strategy
10 year cycle
Very broad aims
Separate functional strategies
overlapping time cycles
Schools have significant autonomy and financial independence
IT strategy is a Governance strategy
sets the framework and boundaries rather than content and substance
Issues – 1 - Success
In Question 4 we asked
How well do you think that your institutional strategy development succeeds in integrating consideration of technology? How would you improve it?
Answers
Most said “Reasonably well”
Whatever their style of strategy development
Issues - 2
Two principal models of University
Federal
Number of strong independent planning loci
Unitary
Planning is concentrated with clear central view taken
Variants of Disjoint are most common
Issues – 3 – the role of technology
Technology can be
Transformational
ie radical change of the institution
Few HEIs
A strategic enabler
The strategy cannot be achieved without technology
Some HEIs
An operational enabler
Technology used to deliver but not critical
The norm for HEIs
Issues – 4 – The role of the Head of ICT CIO territory CTO territory The Comfort Zone The Hard part
Issues - 5
Where does the Head of ICT sit in the hierarchy
SMT
Elsewhere
This was the major issue seen as needing improvement in the answers to
How well do you think that your institutional strategy development succeeds in integrating consideration of technology? How would you improve it?
Issues - 6
The skills/characteristics of the
Head of ICT
CTO
CIO
Frequently from outside the sector
What is good practice?
Clear that most institutions have thought about how and where consideration of ICT is made in the strategic planning process
Not clear that all CEOs understand what technology can/cannot deliver
But
if you are not using the tools to hand optimally, you are denying yourself opportunities
What is good practice?
Our recent work on shared services for the JISC
HEIs must deal with
Globalisation of HE
Economic downturn
HEIs need to be
Lean
Agile
Technology critical to both of these
What is good practice?
We sought to establish examples of good practice
Practice and processes which ensure that consideration of ICT is brought into play effectively in development and delivery of institutional overall corporate strategy
Fundamental criterion for establishing effectiveness was the judgement of those interviewed
To improve good practice
SMTs should be technology literate
ie at least one member of SMT should understand what technology can and cannot deliver
Requires CIO or equivalent
Technology should at least be a strategic enabler
Cannot achieve this without integrated strategy development
UK HEIs should develop
Their own CIOs
Technology support staff who are business focused
Dearing Recommendation 42
“ We recommend that all higher education institutions should develop managers who combine a deep understanding of Communications and Information Technology with senior management experience.”
0 comments
Post a comment