The Integration Of Technology Into Institutional Corporate Strategy

Loading...

Flash Player 9 (or above) is needed to view presentations.
We have detected that you do not have it on your computer. To install it, go here.

0 comments

Post a comment

    Post a comment
    Embed Video
    Edit your comment Cancel

    Favorites, Groups & Events

    The Integration Of Technology Into Institutional Corporate Strategy - Presentation Transcript

    1. The integration of technology into institutional corporate strategy A study for the JISC and the Leadership Foundation for Higher Education by Duke & Jordan Ltd with Bob Powell
    2. Purpose of Study
      • Identification of the issues and development needs relating to the integration of technology into institutional strategies in UK higher education
      • Examination of
        • awareness
        • current practices
        • potential benefit
    3. Who we interviewed– 1 England NI Scotland Wales Grand Total Governor 1 1 2 SMT 9 2 1 2 14 Planning Officer 4 1 1 6 Head of ICT 13 1 4 2 20 Other 6 1 7 Grand Total 33 5 7 4 49
    4. Who we interviewed – 2 England NI Scotland Wales Grand Total Non Educational org 2 1 3 Other HE organisation 6 1 7 Non Uni HEI 1 2 3 Post 92 Uni 1 2 3 92 Uni 5 2 7 Pre-92 uni 12 2 3 17 Russell Uni 6 1 2 9 Grand Total 33 5 7 4 49
    5. Split of HEIs interviewed England NI Scotland Wales Grand Total Non Uni HEI 1 1 2 Post 92 Uni 1 1 2 92 Uni 5 1 6 Pre-92 uni 6 1 2 9 Russell Uni 4 1 1 6 Grand Total 17 2 4 2 25
    6. Essence of questions to institutional players
      • How does your institutional strategy development process work? How are any conflicts resolved?
      • How does technology currently contribute to delivering your institutional key strategic imperatives in Teaching and Learning, Research, Administration and other activities
      • How does your institution know where and how technology can make a significant contribution to institutional strategy?
      • How well do you think that your institutional strategy development succeeds in integrating consideration of technology? How would you improve it?
    7. The role of technology
      • Technology can be
        • Transformational
          • ie radical change of the institution
        • A strategic enabler
          • The strategy cannot be achieved without technology
        • An operational enabler
          • Technology used to deliver but not critical
    8. Strategy Development – Integrated Model CEO SMT University Committees. Academic Units Vision Draft strategy Governors Final strategy Approval Implementation Head of ICT and IS Policy Committee
    9. Corporate Strategy Development – Disjoint Model CEO SMT University Committees. Academic Units Vision Governors Final strategy Approval Implementation Draft strategy
    10. Technology Strategy Development – Disjoint Model CEO SMT University Committees. Academic Units Vision Draft strategy Governors Final strategy Approval Implementation Head of ICT and IS Policy Committee Implementation Draft strategy Draft technology strategy Final technology strategy
    11. Five Examples
      • 1 small HEI
      • 2 1992 HEIs
      • One pre-1992 HEI
      • One Russell Group HEI
    12. Example - Institution A
      • Coherent long term corporate vision of institution
      • Technology at the core of university-wide change
      • Structure of roles to develop and deliver strategy
      • Considerable autonomy in Schools
      • Currently have a separate IS strategy
        • Last time for this
    13. Example - Institution B
      • No technology strategy felt to be needed
      • Enterprise architecture approach within institutional strategy
        • Cascades down to technology
      • Open senior management team
        • No specific IT skills within SMT
          • But involvement of several members in technology management
    14. Example - Institution C
      • Small vocationally-focussed institution
      • Integrated model
      • Technology seen as a strategic enabler
      • CEO and Deputy CEO technology literate
      • Management team tasked to deliver strategy
      • Consultation around How ? rather than What ?
      • Innovation + partnership in technology as key element of success
    15. Example - Institution D
      • Vision and top level strategy
        • developed by SMT
      • Rolling approach
        • roughly one area of strategy updated annually
      • ICT seen as strategic enabler
        • One strategy component is devoted to ICT
    16. Example - Institution E
      • Very long term corporate strategy
        • 10 year cycle
        • Very broad aims
      • Separate functional strategies
        • overlapping time cycles
      • Schools have significant autonomy and financial independence
      • IT strategy is a Governance strategy
        • sets the framework and boundaries rather than content and substance
    17. Issues – 1 - Success
      • In Question 4 we asked
        • How well do you think that your institutional strategy development succeeds in integrating consideration of technology? How would you improve it?
      • Answers
        • Most said “Reasonably well”
          • Whatever their style of strategy development
    18. Issues - 2
      • Two principal models of University
        • Federal
          • Number of strong independent planning loci
        • Unitary
          • Planning is concentrated with clear central view taken
      • Variants of Disjoint are most common
    19. Issues – 3 – the role of technology
      • Technology can be
        • Transformational
          • ie radical change of the institution
          • Few HEIs
        • A strategic enabler
          • The strategy cannot be achieved without technology
          • Some HEIs
        • An operational enabler
          • Technology used to deliver but not critical
          • The norm for HEIs
    20. Issues – 4 – The role of the Head of ICT CIO territory CTO territory The Comfort Zone The Hard part
    21. Issues - 5
      • Where does the Head of ICT sit in the hierarchy
        • SMT
        • Elsewhere
      • This was the major issue seen as needing improvement in the answers to
          • How well do you think that your institutional strategy development succeeds in integrating consideration of technology? How would you improve it?
    22. Issues - 6
      • The skills/characteristics of the
        • Head of ICT
        • CTO
        • CIO
          • Frequently from outside the sector
    23. What is good practice?
      • Clear that most institutions have thought about how and where consideration of ICT is made in the strategic planning process
      • Not clear that all CEOs understand what technology can/cannot deliver
      • But
        • if you are not using the tools to hand optimally, you are denying yourself opportunities
    24. What is good practice?
        • Our recent work on shared services for the JISC
          • HEIs must deal with
            • Globalisation of HE
            • Economic downturn
          • HEIs need to be
            • Lean
            • Agile
          • Technology critical to both of these
    25. What is good practice?
        • We sought to establish examples of good practice
          • Practice and processes which ensure that consideration of ICT is brought into play effectively in development and delivery of institutional overall corporate strategy
          • Fundamental criterion for establishing effectiveness was the judgement of those interviewed
    26. To improve good practice
      • SMTs should be technology literate
        • ie at least one member of SMT should understand what technology can and cannot deliver
          • Requires CIO or equivalent
      • Technology should at least be a strategic enabler
        • Cannot achieve this without integrated strategy development
      • UK HEIs should develop
        • Their own CIOs
        • Technology support staff who are business focused
    27. Dearing Recommendation 42
      • “ We recommend that all higher education institutions should develop managers who combine a deep understanding of Communications and Information Technology with senior management experience.”
    28. Thank you

    + Hector PeeblesHector Peebles, 2 years ago

    custom

    303 views, 0 favs, 1 embeds more stats

    Duke & Jordan

    More info about this document

    © All Rights Reserved

    Go to text version

    • Total Views 303
      • 296 on SlideShare
      • 7 from embeds
    • Comments 0
    • Favorites 0
    • Downloads 18
    Most viewed embeds
    • 7 views on http://strategictechnology.jiscinvolve.org

    more

    All embeds
    • 7 views on http://strategictechnology.jiscinvolve.org

    less

    Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
    Flag as inappropriate

    Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate. If needed, use the feedback form to let us know more details.

    Cancel
    File a copyright complaint
    Having problems? Go to our helpdesk?

    Categories