• Share
  • Email
  • Embed
  • Like
  • Save
  • Private Content
Workplace Wellness - State of Wellness 2012 US National Survey Results - Raw Data
 

Workplace Wellness - State of Wellness 2012 US National Survey Results - Raw Data

on

  • 325 views

 

Statistics

Views

Total Views
325
Views on SlideShare
289
Embed Views
36

Actions

Likes
0
Downloads
3
Comments
0

1 Embed 36

http://statesofwellness.healthiermn.com 36

Accessibility

Categories

Upload Details

Uploaded via as Adobe PDF

Usage Rights

© All Rights Reserved

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Processing…
Post Comment
Edit your comment

    Workplace Wellness - State of Wellness 2012 US National Survey Results - Raw Data Workplace Wellness - State of Wellness 2012 US National Survey Results - Raw Data Presentation Transcript

    • WORKPLACE WELLNESS INITIATIVES STUDY / 12430 / SEPTEMBER 2012 PAGE 1Table 1-1QUESTION 1:What types of health care plans, if any, does your organization currently offer your employees? Even if your organization does not contribute to the premium but just makesinsurance available, and the worker pays 100%, we would consider that to be offering health insurance.BANNER 1 ORG HEALTH ORGANIZATION SIZE PROFIT STATUS REGION EMPLOYEES W/ CARE YEARS IN OPERATION GRADE ================= ================= ======================= ================== ======================= =========== NON- 100- PRIV- PUB- PROF/ NORTH MID- 0-10 11-20 21-50 51+ TOTAL 1-99 499 500+ ATE LIC GOVT -EAST SOUTH WEST WEST 0-74% 75-84% 85%+ YRS YRS YRS YRS A/B C/D/F ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----BASE=TOTAL ASKED 406 113 124 169 212 77 117 61 129 140 76 108 79 169 46 61 144 135 234 169 100% 28% 31% 42% 52% 19% 29% 15% 32% 34% 19% 27% 19% 42% 11% 15% 35% 33% 58% 42%PPO, OR PREFERRED PROVIDER 323 80 102 141 165 63 95 38 110 111 64 84 64 141 35 44 114 113 189 132ORGANIZATION 80% 71% 82% 83% 78% 82% 81% 62% 85% 79% 84% 78% 81% 83% 76% 72% 79% 84% 81% 78%HDHP WITH HSA, OR A 143 37 46 60 69 34 40 10 45 57 31 39 31 59 17 16 54 49 73 70HIGH-DEDUCTIBLE HEALTH PLAN 35% 33% 37% 36% 33% 44% 34% 16% 35% 41% 41% 36% 39% 35% 37% 26% 38% 36% 31% 41%WITH HEALTH SAVINGS ACCOUNTHMO, OR HEALTH MAINTENANCE 120 31 29 60 53 26 41 25 42 22 31 34 24 51 10 15 53 36 64 55ORGANIZATION 30% 27% 23% 36% 25% 34% 35% 41% 33% 16% 41% 31% 30% 30% 22% 25% 37% 27% 27% 33%HRA, OR HEALTH 70 8 26 36 27 14 29 12 15 30 13 17 15 30 5 7 29 25 34 36REIMBURSEMENT ARRANGEMENTS 17% 7% 21% 21% 13% 18% 25% 20% 12% 21% 17% 16% 19% 18% 11% 11% 20% 19% 15% 21%POS, OR POINT OF SERVICE 57 18 13 26 21 11 25 14 21 17 5 12 13 27 6 7 19 22 32 25 14% 16% 10% 15% 10% 14% 21% 23% 16% 12% 7% 11% 16% 16% 13% 11% 13% 16% 14% 15%INDEMNITY PLAN 9 3 1 5 2 2 5 1 3 5 - 4 1 4 - - 6 3 4 4 2% 3% 1% 3% 1% 3% 4% 2% 2% 4% - 4% 1% 2% - - 4% 2% 2% 2%SOMETHING ELSE 4 1 2 1 1 - 3 2 1 1 - 1 1 2 1 2 - 1 2 2 1% 1% 2% 1% - - 3% 3% 1% 1% - 1% 1% 1% 2% 3% - 1% 1% 1%DO NOT OFFER HEALTH CARE 12 9 3 - 12 - - 1 3 6 2 - - - 4 5 2 1 7 4PLANS 3% 8% 2% - 6% - - 2% 2% 4% 3% - - - 9% 8% 1% 1% 3% 2% P U B L I C O P I N I O N S T R A T E G I E S
    • WORKPLACE WELLNESS INITIATIVES STUDY / 12430 / SEPTEMBER 2012 PAGE 2Table 1-2QUESTION 1:What types of health care plans, if any, does your organization currently offer your employees? Even if your organization does not contribute to the premium but just makesinsurance available, and the worker pays 100%, we would consider that to be offering health insurance.BANNER 2 WELLNESS ROLE OF IMPORTANT ISSUES (%10) HEALTH CONCERNS (COMBINED) - BENEFICIAL STATE/LOCAL GOVT ROLE OF FED GOVT ======================== =============================== ================= ================= ================= DECR LACK HIGH NOT INSU- PROD- WORK- OBES- STRESS OF CHRON BLOOD VERY/ MORE LESS NO MORE LESS NO RANCE UCTI- ABSEN- ERS ITY/ /MEN- FIT- DIS- PRE- AT ACT- ACT- CHAN- ACT- ACT- CHAN- TOTAL COSTS VITY TEEISM COMP WEIGHT TAL NESS EASE SSURE VERY SMWT ALL IVE IVE GE IVE IVE GE ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ------ ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----BASE=TOTAL ASKED 406 197 140 120 110 211 207 205 133 136 154 199 51 184 60 148 152 79 157 100% 49% 34% 30% 27% 52% 51% 50% 33% 33% 38% 49% 13% 45% 15% 36% 37% 19% 39%PPO, OR PREFERRED PROVIDER 323 161 114 100 96 164 171 165 106 111 130 154 38 141 44 125 118 59 129ORGANIZATION 80% 82% 81% 83% 87% 78% 83% 80% 80% 82% 84% 77% 75% 77% 73% 84% 78% 75% 82%HDHP WITH HSA, OR A 143 77 50 43 35 71 75 82 48 50 59 65 17 67 21 49 54 29 52HIGH-DEDUCTIBLE HEALTH PLAN 35% 39% 36% 36% 32% 34% 36% 40% 36% 37% 38% 33% 33% 36% 35% 33% 36% 37% 33%WITH HEALTH SAVINGS ACCOUNTHMO, OR HEALTH MAINTENANCE 120 59 44 33 29 62 68 59 45 35 49 51 20 54 15 47 47 18 50ORGANIZATION 30% 30% 31% 28% 26% 29% 33% 29% 34% 26% 32% 26% 39% 29% 25% 32% 31% 23% 32%HRA, OR HEALTH 70 33 22 22 17 41 39 40 23 25 32 34 4 33 10 25 28 15 24REIMBURSEMENT ARRANGEMENTS 17% 17% 16% 18% 15% 19% 19% 20% 17% 18% 21% 17% 8% 18% 17% 17% 18% 19% 15%POS, OR POINT OF SERVICE 57 27 28 22 13 31 32 25 18 19 23 29 4 24 12 20 24 14 16 14% 14% 20% 18% 12% 15% 15% 12% 14% 14% 15% 15% 8% 13% 20% 14% 16% 18% 10%INDEMNITY PLAN 9 7 5 4 3 6 6 4 5 2 5 3 1 4 - 5 3 - 6 2% 4% 4% 3% 3% 3% 3% 2% 4% 1% 3% 2% 2% 2% - 3% 2% - 4%SOMETHING ELSE 4 3 1 - - 3 1 1 2 3 1 3 - 2 1 1 1 1 2 1% 2% 1% - - 1% - - 2% 2% 1% 2% - 1% 2% 1% 1% 1% 1%DO NOT OFFER HEALTH CARE 12 3 4 3 1 7 2 5 6 2 2 6 4 4 1 6 2 1 9PLANS 3% 2% 3% 3% 1% 3% 1% 2% 5% 1% 1% 3% 8% 2% 2% 4% 1% 1% 6% P U B L I C O P I N I O N S T R A T E G I E S
    • WORKPLACE WELLNESS INITIATIVES STUDY / 12430 / SEPTEMBER 2012 PAGE 3Table 1-3QUESTION 1:What types of health care plans, if any, does your organization currently offer your employees? Even if your organization does not contribute to the premium but just makesinsurance available, and the worker pays 100%, we would consider that to be offering health insurance.BANNER 3 ------------------- AMONG THOSE WITH WELLNESS INITIATIVE --------------------- HAVE WELLNESS % OF YEARS FINANCIAL EMPLOYEE ACCESS INITATIVE OPERATING BUDGET IN OPERATION INCENTIVE ROI TO INITIATIVE =========== ================= ================= =========== =========== ================== 6% OR 1-2 3-4 5+ TOTAL YES NO 0-1% 2-5% MORE YRS YRS YRS YES NO YES NO 0-74% 75-84% 85%+ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ -----BASE=TOTAL ASKED 406 224 182 78 64 26 73 43 90 111 110 90 124 19 13 172 100% 55% 45% 35% 29% 12% 33% 19% 40% 50% 49% 40% 55% 8% 6% 77%PPO, OR PREFERRED PROVIDER 323 185 138 63 51 20 54 32 82 94 89 72 105 13 11 142ORGANIZATION 80% 83% 76% 81% 80% 77% 74% 74% 91% 85% 81% 80% 85% 68% 85% 83%HDHP WITH HSA, OR A 143 89 54 29 27 11 29 22 30 53 34 33 53 8 7 65HIGH-DEDUCTIBLE HEALTH PLAN 35% 40% 30% 37% 42% 42% 40% 51% 33% 48% 31% 37% 43% 42% 54% 38%WITH HEALTH SAVINGS ACCOUNTHMO, OR HEALTH MAINTENANCE 120 67 53 19 16 11 22 17 20 24 43 32 31 6 3 52ORGANIZATION 30% 30% 29% 24% 25% 42% 30% 40% 22% 22% 39% 36% 25% 32% 23% 30%HRA, OR HEALTH 70 53 17 18 16 10 13 13 23 34 19 23 29 4 1 42REIMBURSEMENT ARRANGEMENTS 17% 24% 9% 23% 25% 38% 18% 30% 26% 31% 17% 26% 23% 21% 8% 24%POS, OR POINT OF SERVICE 57 36 21 11 8 9 14 6 14 15 21 18 16 5 1 28 14% 16% 12% 14% 13% 35% 19% 14% 16% 14% 19% 20% 13% 26% 8% 16%INDEMNITY PLAN 9 5 4 3 1 1 3 - 2 2 3 1 4 1 - 4 2% 2% 2% 4% 2% 4% 4% - 2% 2% 3% 1% 3% 5% - 2%SOMETHING ELSE 4 1 3 1 - - - 1 - 1 - - 1 - - 1 1% - 2% 1% - - - 2% - 1% - - 1% - - 1%DO NOT OFFER HEALTH CARE 12 3 9 1 1 1 1 - 2 - 2 - 2 1 - 2PLANS 3% 1% 5% 1% 2% 4% 1% - 2% - 2% - 2% 5% - 1% P U B L I C O P I N I O N S T R A T E G I E S
    • WORKPLACE WELLNESS INITIATIVES STUDY / 12430 / SEPTEMBER 2012 PAGE 4Table 2-1QUESTION 2:Approximately what percentage of your organizations operating budget would you say is spent on health insurance coverage for your employees? This excludes employee programsfocused on health and wellness that are separate from health insurance coverage.BANNER 1 ORG HEALTH ORGANIZATION SIZE PROFIT STATUS REGION EMPLOYEES W/ CARE YEARS IN OPERATION GRADE ================= ================= ======================= ================== ======================= =========== NON- 100- PRIV- PUB- PROF/ NORTH MID- 0-10 11-20 21-50 51+ TOTAL 1-99 499 500+ ATE LIC GOVT -EAST SOUTH WEST WEST 0-74% 75-84% 85%+ YRS YRS YRS YRS A/B C/D/F ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----BASE=TOTAL ASKED 267 75 86 106 138 46 83 41 83 96 47 82 53 119 22 41 102 94 155 111 100% 28% 32% 40% 52% 17% 31% 15% 31% 36% 18% 31% 20% 45% 8% 15% 38% 35% 58% 42%0-24% 203 64 66 73 109 29 65 38 61 73 31 68 44 85 17 32 81 68 125 77 76% 85% 77% 69% 79% 63% 78% 93% 73% 76% 66% 83% 83% 71% 77% 78% 79% 72% 81% 69%25-49% 51 10 16 25 20 13 18 3 18 16 14 10 7 29 4 7 17 21 29 22 19% 13% 19% 24% 14% 28% 22% 7% 22% 17% 30% 12% 13% 24% 18% 17% 17% 22% 19% 20%50-74% 10 - 3 7 7 3 - - 3 5 2 3 1 5 1 2 3 4 1 9 4% - 3% 7% 5% 7% - - 4% 5% 4% 4% 2% 4% 5% 5% 3% 4% 1% 8%75%+ 3 1 1 1 2 1 - - 1 2 - 1 1 - - - 1 1 - 3 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 2% - - 1% 2% - 1% 2% - - - 1% 1% - 3%MEAN 15.4 10.7 15.4 18.8 15.3 19.7 13.3 10.9 15.7 16.3 17.0 14.0 14.2 15.9 15.5 14.7 14.4 16.2 12.6 19.5 P U B L I C O P I N I O N S T R A T E G I E S
    • WORKPLACE WELLNESS INITIATIVES STUDY / 12430 / SEPTEMBER 2012 PAGE 5Table 2-2QUESTION 2:Approximately what percentage of your organizations operating budget would you say is spent on health insurance coverage for your employees? This excludes employee programsfocused on health and wellness that are separate from health insurance coverage.BANNER 2 WELLNESS ROLE OF IMPORTANT ISSUES (%10) HEALTH CONCERNS (COMBINED) - BENEFICIAL STATE/LOCAL GOVT ROLE OF FED GOVT ======================== =============================== ================= ================= ================= DECR LACK HIGH NOT INSU- PROD- WORK- OBES- STRESS OF CHRON BLOOD VERY/ MORE LESS NO MORE LESS NO RANCE UCTI- ABSEN- ERS ITY/ /MEN- FIT- DIS- PRE- AT ACT- ACT- CHAN- ACT- ACT- CHAN- TOTAL COSTS VITY TEEISM COMP WEIGHT TAL NESS EASE SSURE VERY SMWT ALL IVE IVE GE IVE IVE GE ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ------ ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----BASE=TOTAL ASKED 267 123 102 86 75 140 134 138 89 91 103 133 30 132 37 92 106 49 101 100% 46% 38% 32% 28% 52% 50% 52% 33% 34% 39% 50% 11% 49% 14% 34% 40% 18% 38%0-24% 203 88 72 63 48 104 105 106 69 70 69 111 22 94 29 78 75 43 82 76% 72% 71% 73% 64% 74% 78% 77% 78% 77% 67% 83% 73% 71% 78% 85% 71% 88% 81%25-49% 51 25 23 16 17 32 21 24 18 17 30 15 6 30 7 11 25 6 16 19% 20% 23% 19% 23% 23% 16% 17% 20% 19% 29% 11% 20% 23% 19% 12% 24% 12% 16%50-74% 10 7 5 5 7 3 7 7 - 3 4 5 1 8 - 2 5 - 3 4% 6% 5% 6% 9% 2% 5% 5% - 3% 4% 4% 3% 6% - 2% 5% - 3%75%+ 3 3 2 2 3 1 1 1 2 1 - 2 1 - 1 1 1 - - 1% 2% 2% 2% 4% 1% 1% 1% 2% 1% - 2% 3% - 3% 1% 1% - -MEAN 15.4 17.8 17.1 17.4 21.1 15.2 15.2 15.6 14.5 15.2 17.5 13.7 15.9 16.9 14.4 12.8 17.6 10.3 13.2 P U B L I C O P I N I O N S T R A T E G I E S
    • WORKPLACE WELLNESS INITIATIVES STUDY / 12430 / SEPTEMBER 2012 PAGE 6Table 2-3QUESTION 2:Approximately what percentage of your organizations operating budget would you say is spent on health insurance coverage for your employees? This excludes employee programsfocused on health and wellness that are separate from health insurance coverage.BANNER 3 ------------------- AMONG THOSE WITH WELLNESS INITIATIVE --------------------- HAVE WELLNESS % OF YEARS FINANCIAL EMPLOYEE ACCESS INITATIVE OPERATING BUDGET IN OPERATION INCENTIVE ROI TO INITIATIVE =========== ================= ================= =========== =========== ================== 6% OR 1-2 3-4 5+ TOTAL YES NO 0-1% 2-5% MORE YRS YRS YRS YES NO YES NO 0-74% 75-84% 85%+ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ -----BASE=TOTAL ASKED 267 154 113 66 57 22 49 31 71 83 71 66 85 13 8 126 100% 58% 42% 43% 37% 14% 32% 20% 46% 54% 46% 43% 55% 8% 5% 82%0-24% 203 111 92 61 42 3 37 22 51 62 49 45 64 10 7 92 76% 72% 81% 92% 74% 14% 76% 71% 72% 75% 69% 68% 75% 77% 88% 73%25-49% 51 35 16 5 14 14 10 6 18 18 17 18 16 2 1 29 19% 23% 14% 8% 25% 64% 20% 19% 25% 22% 24% 27% 19% 15% 13% 23%50-74% 10 6 4 - 1 4 2 1 2 3 3 2 4 1 - 4 4% 4% 4% - 2% 18% 4% 3% 3% 4% 4% 3% 5% 8% - 3%75%+ 3 2 1 - - 1 - 2 - - 2 1 1 - - 1 1% 1% 1% - - 5% - 6% - - 3% 2% 1% - - 1%MEAN 15.4 16.5 14.0 8.2 16.3 38.2 15.8 20.6 14.8 15.3 18.0 18.5 14.9 19.3 12.0 15.6 P U B L I C O P I N I O N S T R A T E G I E S
    • WORKPLACE WELLNESS INITIATIVES STUDY / 12430 / SEPTEMBER 2012 PAGE 7Table 3-1QUESTION 3:What grade would you give your organizations employees in terms of being healthy?BANNER 1 ORG HEALTH ORGANIZATION SIZE PROFIT STATUS REGION EMPLOYEES W/ CARE YEARS IN OPERATION GRADE ================= ================= ======================= ================== ======================= =========== NON- 100- PRIV- PUB- PROF/ NORTH MID- 0-10 11-20 21-50 51+ TOTAL 1-99 499 500+ ATE LIC GOVT -EAST SOUTH WEST WEST 0-74% 75-84% 85%+ YRS YRS YRS YRS A/B C/D/F ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----BASE=TOTAL ASKED 403 113 122 168 210 76 117 61 127 139 76 108 78 168 46 61 142 134 234 169 100% 28% 30% 42% 52% 19% 29% 15% 32% 34% 19% 27% 19% 42% 11% 15% 35% 33% 58% 42%**D/S (A/B - C/D/F) 65 53 16 -4 42 18 5 21 13 11 20 10 8 36 16 11 22 10 234 -169 16% 47% 13% -2% 20% 24% 4% 34% 10% 8% 26% 9% 10% 21% 35% 18% 15% 7% 100% -100%A/B 234 83 69 82 126 47 61 41 70 75 48 59 43 102 31 36 82 72 234 ---- 58% 73% 57% 49% 60% 62% 52% 67% 55% 54% 63% 55% 55% 61% 67% 59% 58% 54% 100% -C/D/F 169 30 53 86 84 29 56 20 57 64 28 49 35 66 15 25 60 62 - 169----- 42% 27% 43% 51% 40% 38% 48% 33% 45% 46% 37% 45% 45% 39% 33% 41% 42% 46% - 100% A 16 7 2 7 11 2 3 2 5 3 6 3 4 4 4 2 4 5 16 - 4% 6% 2% 4% 5% 3% 3% 3% 4% 2% 8% 3% 5% 2% 9% 3% 3% 4% 7% - B 218 76 67 75 115 45 58 39 65 72 42 56 39 98 27 34 78 67 218 - 54% 67% 55% 45% 55% 59% 50% 64% 51% 52% 55% 52% 50% 58% 59% 56% 55% 50% 93% - C 153 26 48 79 75 26 52 16 54 56 27 45 31 60 14 24 53 55 - 153 38% 23% 39% 47% 36% 34% 44% 26% 43% 40% 36% 42% 40% 36% 30% 39% 37% 41% - 91% D 15 3 5 7 9 3 3 4 3 7 1 3 4 6 1 1 7 6 - 15 4% 3% 4% 4% 4% 4% 3% 7% 2% 5% 1% 3% 5% 4% 2% 2% 5% 4% - 9% F 1 1 - - - - 1 - - 1 - 1 - - - - - 1 - 1 - 1% - - - - 1% - - 1% - 1% - - - - - 1% - 1% P U B L I C O P I N I O N S T R A T E G I E S
    • WORKPLACE WELLNESS INITIATIVES STUDY / 12430 / SEPTEMBER 2012 PAGE 8Table 3-2QUESTION 3:What grade would you give your organizations employees in terms of being healthy?BANNER 2 WELLNESS ROLE OF IMPORTANT ISSUES (%10) HEALTH CONCERNS (COMBINED) - BENEFICIAL STATE/LOCAL GOVT ROLE OF FED GOVT ======================== =============================== ================= ================= ================= DECR LACK HIGH NOT INSU- PROD- WORK- OBES- STRESS OF CHRON BLOOD VERY/ MORE LESS NO MORE LESS NO RANCE UCTI- ABSEN- ERS ITY/ /MEN- FIT- DIS- PRE- AT ACT- ACT- CHAN- ACT- ACT- CHAN- TOTAL COSTS VITY TEEISM COMP WEIGHT TAL NESS EASE SSURE VERY SMWT ALL IVE IVE GE IVE IVE GE ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ------ ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----BASE=TOTAL ASKED 403 195 139 120 109 209 206 205 132 135 152 198 51 183 60 147 151 79 155 100% 48% 34% 30% 27% 52% 51% 51% 33% 33% 38% 49% 13% 45% 15% 36% 37% 20% 38%**D/S (A/B - C/D/F) 65 9 25 14 17 -7 58 27 20 15 26 30 11 7 14 43 9 19 35 16% 5% 18% 12% 16% -3% 28% 13% 15% 11% 17% 15% 22% 4% 23% 29% 6% 24% 23%A/B 234 102 82 67 63 101 132 116 76 75 89 114 31 95 37 95 80 49 95--- 58% 52% 59% 56% 58% 48% 64% 57% 58% 56% 59% 58% 61% 52% 62% 65% 53% 62% 61%C/D/F 169 93 57 53 46 108 74 89 56 60 63 84 20 88 23 52 71 30 60----- 42% 48% 41% 44% 42% 52% 36% 43% 42% 44% 41% 42% 39% 48% 38% 35% 47% 38% 39% A 16 2 3 4 3 2 10 6 7 5 8 4 4 8 4 3 8 4 3 4% 1% 2% 3% 3% 1% 5% 3% 5% 4% 5% 2% 8% 4% 7% 2% 5% 5% 2% B 218 100 79 63 60 99 122 110 69 70 81 110 27 87 33 92 72 45 92 54% 51% 57% 53% 55% 47% 59% 54% 52% 52% 53% 56% 53% 48% 55% 63% 48% 57% 59% C 153 83 51 47 42 99 68 81 50 52 57 76 18 80 21 47 66 26 54 38% 43% 37% 39% 39% 47% 33% 40% 38% 39% 38% 38% 35% 44% 35% 32% 44% 33% 35% D 15 10 6 6 4 8 6 8 5 8 6 7 2 7 2 5 4 4 6 4% 5% 4% 5% 4% 4% 3% 4% 4% 6% 4% 4% 4% 4% 3% 3% 3% 5% 4% F 1 - - - - 1 - - 1 - - 1 - 1 - - 1 - - - - - - - - - - 1% - - 1% - 1% - - 1% - - P U B L I C O P I N I O N S T R A T E G I E S
    • WORKPLACE WELLNESS INITIATIVES STUDY / 12430 / SEPTEMBER 2012 PAGE 9Table 3-3QUESTION 3:What grade would you give your organizations employees in terms of being healthy?BANNER 3 ------------------- AMONG THOSE WITH WELLNESS INITIATIVE --------------------- HAVE WELLNESS % OF YEARS FINANCIAL EMPLOYEE ACCESS INITATIVE OPERATING BUDGET IN OPERATION INCENTIVE ROI TO INITIATIVE =========== ================= ================= =========== =========== ================== 6% OR 1-2 3-4 5+ TOTAL YES NO 0-1% 2-5% MORE YRS YRS YRS YES NO YES NO 0-74% 75-84% 85%+ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ -----BASE=TOTAL ASKED 403 222 181 77 64 25 72 43 89 111 109 89 124 19 13 170 100% 55% 45% 35% 29% 11% 32% 19% 40% 50% 49% 40% 56% 9% 6% 77%**D/S (A/B - C/D/F) 65 30 35 21 6 -5 -8 -9 41 3 27 13 16 -1 -5 30 16% 14% 19% 27% 9% -20% -11% -21% 46% 3% 25% 15% 13% -5% -38% 18%A/B 234 126 108 49 35 10 32 17 65 57 68 51 70 9 4 100--- 58% 57% 60% 64% 55% 40% 44% 40% 73% 51% 62% 57% 56% 47% 31% 59%C/D/F 169 96 73 28 29 15 40 26 24 54 41 38 54 10 9 70----- 42% 43% 40% 36% 45% 60% 56% 60% 27% 49% 38% 43% 44% 53% 69% 41% A 16 10 6 2 3 1 4 1 2 3 7 5 5 1 - 6 4% 5% 3% 3% 5% 4% 6% 2% 2% 3% 6% 6% 4% 5% - 4% B 218 116 102 47 32 9 28 16 63 54 61 46 65 8 4 94 54% 52% 56% 61% 50% 36% 39% 37% 71% 49% 56% 52% 52% 42% 31% 55% C 153 91 62 26 27 14 37 24 24 49 41 37 50 9 9 66 38% 41% 34% 34% 42% 56% 51% 56% 27% 44% 38% 42% 40% 47% 69% 39% D 15 5 10 2 2 1 3 2 - 5 - 1 4 1 - 4 4% 2% 6% 3% 3% 4% 4% 5% - 5% - 1% 3% 5% - 2% F 1 - 1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1% - - - - - - - - - - - - - P U B L I C O P I N I O N S T R A T E G I E S
    • WORKPLACE WELLNESS INITIATIVES STUDY / 12430 / SEPTEMBER 2012 PAGE 10Table 4-1Summary of Priorities: % 10BANNER 1 ORG HEALTH ORGANIZATION SIZE PROFIT STATUS REGION EMPLOYEES W/ CARE YEARS IN OPERATION GRADE ================= ================= ======================= ================== ======================= =========== NON- 100- PRIV- PUB- PROF/ NORTH MID- 0-10 11-20 21-50 51+ TOTAL 1-99 499 500+ ATE LIC GOVT -EAST SOUTH WEST WEST 0-74% 75-84% 85%+ YRS YRS YRS YRS A/B C/D/F ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----BASE=TOTAL ASKED 406 113 124 169 212 77 117 61 129 140 76 108 79 169 46 61 144 135 234 169 100% 28% 31% 42% 52% 19% 29% 15% 32% 34% 19% 27% 19% 42% 11% 15% 35% 33% 58% 42%HEALTH INSURANCE COSTS 197 54 63 80 104 34 59 26 61 69 41 60 34 80 19 22 73 72 102 93 49% 48% 51% 47% 50% 44% 50% 43% 47% 50% 54% 56% 43% 47% 42% 36% 51% 53% 44% 55% (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1)DECREASED PRODUCTIVITY 140 41 42 57 76 27 37 19 42 47 32 33 24 65 14 18 55 46 82 57 35% 37% 34% 34% 36% 35% 32% 32% 33% 34% 42% 31% 31% 38% 32% 30% 38% 34% 35% 34% (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (3) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (3) (2) (2)ABSENTEEISM 120 36 33 51 61 17 42 16 34 46 24 30 22 53 13 13 39 48 67 53 30% 32% 27% 31% 29% 22% 36% 26% 27% 34% 32% 28% 28% 31% 29% 22% 27% 36% 29% 31% (3) (3) (4) (3) (4) (3) (2) (3) (3) (3) (4) (4) (3) (3) (3) (4) (3) (2) (3) (3)WORKERS COMPENSATION OR 110 21 38 51 63 14 33 13 31 39 27 31 22 43 10 15 37 41 63 46 DISABILITY CLAIMS 27% 19% 31% 30% 30% 18% 28% 22% 24% 28% 36% 29% 28% 25% 22% 25% 26% 30% 27% 27% (4) (4) (3) (4) (3) (4) (4) (4) (4) (4) (3) (3) (4) (4) (4) (3) (4) (4) (4) (4) P U B L I C O P I N I O N S T R A T E G I E S
    • WORKPLACE WELLNESS INITIATIVES STUDY / 12430 / SEPTEMBER 2012 PAGE 11Table 4-2Summary of Priorities: % 10BANNER 2 WELLNESS ROLE OF IMPORTANT ISSUES (%10) HEALTH CONCERNS (COMBINED) - BENEFICIAL STATE/LOCAL GOVT ROLE OF FED GOVT ======================== =============================== ================= ================= ================= DECR LACK HIGH NOT INSU- PROD- WORK- OBES- STRESS OF CHRON BLOOD VERY/ MORE LESS NO MORE LESS NO RANCE UCTI- ABSEN- ERS ITY/ /MEN- FIT- DIS- PRE- AT ACT- ACT- CHAN- ACT- ACT- CHAN- TOTAL COSTS VITY TEEISM COMP WEIGHT TAL NESS EASE SSURE VERY SMWT ALL IVE IVE GE IVE IVE GE ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ------ ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----BASE=TOTAL ASKED 406 197 140 120 110 211 207 205 133 136 154 199 51 184 60 148 152 79 157 100% 49% 34% 30% 27% 52% 51% 50% 33% 33% 38% 49% 13% 45% 15% 36% 37% 19% 39%HEALTH INSURANCE COSTS 197 197 104 85 89 105 108 103 67 57 93 88 15 92 27 68 75 38 72 49% 100% 75% 71% 81% 50% 52% 50% 50% 42% 61% 44% 29% 50% 45% 46% 49% 48% 46% (1) (1) (2) (3) (2) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1)DECREASED PRODUCTIVITY 140 104 140 98 80 65 72 69 49 44 70 61 9 70 16 47 56 20 53 35% 53% 100% 82% 73% 31% 35% 34% 37% 33% 46% 31% 18% 38% 27% 32% 37% 26% 34% (2) (2) (1) (2) (3) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) *(3) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2)ABSENTEEISM 120 85 98 120 76 62 56 62 45 33 59 50 10 64 12 37 51 19 41 30% 43% 71% 100% 70% 30% 27% 31% 34% 24% 39% 25% 20% 35% 20% 25% 34% 24% 26% (3) (4) (3) (1) (4) (3) (4) (3) (3) (3) (3) (3) (2) (3) (4) (3) (3) (3) (3)WORKERS COMPENSATION OR 110 89 80 76 110 57 60 62 38 25 54 47 9 58 13 34 49 15 39 DISABILITY CLAIMS 27% 45% 58% 64% 100% 27% 29% 30% 29% 19% 36% 24% 18% 32% 22% 23% 32% 19% 25% (4) (3) (4) (4) (1) (4) (3) (4) (4) (4) (4) (4) *(3) (4) (3) (4) (4) (4) (4) P U B L I C O P I N I O N S T R A T E G I E S
    • WORKPLACE WELLNESS INITIATIVES STUDY / 12430 / SEPTEMBER 2012 PAGE 12Table 4-3Summary of Priorities: % 10BANNER 3 ------------------- AMONG THOSE WITH WELLNESS INITIATIVE --------------------- HAVE WELLNESS % OF YEARS FINANCIAL EMPLOYEE ACCESS INITATIVE OPERATING BUDGET IN OPERATION INCENTIVE ROI TO INITIATIVE =========== ================= ================= =========== =========== ================== 6% OR 1-2 3-4 5+ TOTAL YES NO 0-1% 2-5% MORE YRS YRS YRS YES NO YES NO 0-74% 75-84% 85%+ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ -----BASE=TOTAL ASKED 406 224 182 78 64 26 73 43 90 111 110 90 124 19 13 172 100% 55% 45% 35% 29% 12% 33% 19% 40% 50% 49% 40% 55% 8% 6% 77%HEALTH INSURANCE COSTS 197 112 85 34 33 14 42 23 39 60 52 47 59 15 5 80 49% 50% 47% 44% 52% 54% 58% 53% 43% 54% 47% 52% 48% 79% 38% 47% (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1)DECREASED PRODUCTIVITY 140 80 60 28 22 12 30 15 30 42 37 38 38 8 1 65 35% 36% 33% 36% 34% 48% 42% 35% 34% 38% 34% 43% 31% 44% 8% 38% (2) (2) (2) (2) (3) (3) (2) *(2) (3) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (4) (2)ABSENTEEISM 120 70 50 20 23 13 22 14 30 37 32 36 31 7 2 55 30% 32% 28% 26% 36% 52% 31% 33% 34% 34% 29% 40% 25% 37% 15% 33% (3) (3) (3) (4) (2) (2) (3) (4) (2) (3) (3) (3) (3) (3) *(2) (3)WORKERS COMPENSATION OR 110 67 43 23 20 8 21 15 27 36 31 33 29 4 2 53 DISABILITY CLAIMS 27% 30% 24% 30% 31% 32% 29% 35% 31% 33% 28% 37% 24% 21% 15% 31% (4) (4) (4) (3) (4) (4) (4) *(2) (4) (4) (4) (4) (4) (4) *(2) (4) P U B L I C O P I N I O N S T R A T E G I E S
    • WORKPLACE WELLNESS INITIATIVES STUDY / 12430 / SEPTEMBER 2012 PAGE 13Table 5-1Summary of Priorities: % 8-10BANNER 1 ORG HEALTH ORGANIZATION SIZE PROFIT STATUS REGION EMPLOYEES W/ CARE YEARS IN OPERATION GRADE ================= ================= ======================= ================== ======================= =========== NON- 100- PRIV- PUB- PROF/ NORTH MID- 0-10 11-20 21-50 51+ TOTAL 1-99 499 500+ ATE LIC GOVT -EAST SOUTH WEST WEST 0-74% 75-84% 85%+ YRS YRS YRS YRS A/B C/D/F ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----BASE=TOTAL ASKED 406 113 124 169 212 77 117 61 129 140 76 108 79 169 46 61 144 135 234 169 100% 28% 31% 42% 52% 19% 29% 15% 32% 34% 19% 27% 19% 42% 11% 15% 35% 33% 58% 42%HEALTH INSURANCE COSTS 340 93 102 145 172 66 102 50 106 122 62 92 64 147 35 48 119 119 194 144 84% 83% 83% 86% 82% 86% 87% 82% 82% 88% 82% 85% 81% 87% 78% 79% 83% 88% 83% 86% (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1)DECREASED PRODUCTIVITY 292 83 84 125 158 57 77 44 94 94 60 80 51 127 32 45 107 93 173 117 73% 74% 69% 74% 76% 74% 66% 73% 73% 68% 79% 75% 65% 75% 73% 74% 75% 69% 75% 69% (2) (2) (2) (3) (2) (2) (3) (2) (2) (3) (2) (3) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (3) (2) (3)ABSENTEEISM 278 75 78 125 140 55 83 44 84 97 53 81 49 115 29 38 101 94 159 119 69% 68% 63% 75% 68% 71% 71% 72% 66% 71% 71% 76% 63% 68% 64% 66% 71% 70% 69% 70% (3) (3) (3) (2) (3) (3) (2) (3) (3) (2) (3) (2) (3) (3) (3) (3) (3) (2) (3) (2)WORKERS COMPENSATION OR 233 54 68 111 117 45 71 38 65 80 50 66 42 98 22 33 81 82 131 101 DISABILITY CLAIMS 58% 49% 56% 66% 56% 58% 61% 63% 51% 58% 66% 62% 53% 58% 49% 54% 57% 61% 56% 60% (4) (4) (4) (4) (4) (4) (4) (4) (4) (4) (4) (4) (4) (4) (4) (4) (4) (4) (4) (4) P U B L I C O P I N I O N S T R A T E G I E S
    • WORKPLACE WELLNESS INITIATIVES STUDY / 12430 / SEPTEMBER 2012 PAGE 14Table 5-2Summary of Priorities: % 8-10BANNER 2 WELLNESS ROLE OF IMPORTANT ISSUES (%10) HEALTH CONCERNS (COMBINED) - BENEFICIAL STATE/LOCAL GOVT ROLE OF FED GOVT ======================== =============================== ================= ================= ================= DECR LACK HIGH NOT INSU- PROD- WORK- OBES- STRESS OF CHRON BLOOD VERY/ MORE LESS NO MORE LESS NO RANCE UCTI- ABSEN- ERS ITY/ /MEN- FIT- DIS- PRE- AT ACT- ACT- CHAN- ACT- ACT- CHAN- TOTAL COSTS VITY TEEISM COMP WEIGHT TAL NESS EASE SSURE VERY SMWT ALL IVE IVE GE IVE IVE GE ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ------ ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----BASE=TOTAL ASKED 406 197 140 120 110 211 207 205 133 136 154 199 51 184 60 148 152 79 157 100% 49% 34% 30% 27% 52% 51% 50% 33% 33% 38% 49% 13% 45% 15% 36% 37% 19% 39%HEALTH INSURANCE COSTS 340 197 128 106 104 180 175 169 113 120 134 170 35 149 51 128 124 69 132 84% 100% 92% 89% 95% 85% 85% 82% 85% 88% 88% 86% 69% 81% 85% 87% 82% 87% 85% (1) (1) (3) (3) (2) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1)DECREASED PRODUCTIVITY 292 156 140 114 99 149 146 147 94 99 118 139 34 134 45 102 115 53 108 73% 80% 100% 96% 90% 71% 71% 72% 71% 73% 78% 70% 67% 73% 76% 69% 76% 68% 70% (2) (2) (1) (2) (3) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2)ABSENTEEISM 278 155 134 120 95 140 142 139 86 91 115 134 28 128 41 99 109 48 106 69% 79% 96% 100% 88% 67% 69% 69% 65% 67% 76% 68% 56% 70% 69% 68% 73% 62% 68% (3) (3) (2) (1) (4) (3) (3) (3) (3) (3) (3) (3) (3) (3) (3) (3) (3) (3) (3)WORKERS COMPENSATION OR 233 138 112 102 110 127 111 118 77 74 97 114 22 113 35 76 90 42 87 DISABILITY CLAIMS 58% 70% 81% 86% 100% 60% 54% 58% 58% 55% 64% 58% 43% 61% 58% 52% 60% 53% 56% (4) (4) (4) (4) (1) (4) (4) (4) (4) (4) (4) (4) (4) (4) (4) (4) (4) (4) (4) P U B L I C O P I N I O N S T R A T E G I E S
    • WORKPLACE WELLNESS INITIATIVES STUDY / 12430 / SEPTEMBER 2012 PAGE 15Table 5-3Summary of Priorities: % 8-10BANNER 3 ------------------- AMONG THOSE WITH WELLNESS INITIATIVE --------------------- HAVE WELLNESS % OF YEARS FINANCIAL EMPLOYEE ACCESS INITATIVE OPERATING BUDGET IN OPERATION INCENTIVE ROI TO INITIATIVE =========== ================= ================= =========== =========== ================== 6% OR 1-2 3-4 5+ TOTAL YES NO 0-1% 2-5% MORE YRS YRS YRS YES NO YES NO 0-74% 75-84% 85%+ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ -----BASE=TOTAL ASKED 406 224 182 78 64 26 73 43 90 111 110 90 124 19 13 172 100% 55% 45% 35% 29% 12% 33% 19% 40% 50% 49% 40% 55% 8% 6% 77%HEALTH INSURANCE COSTS 340 188 152 63 53 23 61 37 75 97 90 78 102 17 9 144 84% 84% 84% 81% 83% 88% 85% 86% 83% 87% 82% 87% 82% 89% 69% 84% (1) (1) (1) (1) *(1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1)DECREASED PRODUCTIVITY 292 164 128 54 53 20 55 31 66 85 77 74 82 14 7 130 73% 74% 71% 69% 83% 80% 76% 72% 74% 77% 70% 83% 66% 78% 54% 76% (2) (2) (2) (2) *(1) *(3) (2) *(2) (2) *(2) (2) (2) (2) (2) *(2) (2)ABSENTEEISM 278 156 122 46 51 21 51 31 61 85 70 71 78 14 7 122 69% 71% 68% 61% 80% 84% 71% 72% 69% 77% 64% 80% 63% 74% 54% 72% (3) (3) (3) (3) (3) (2) (3) *(2) (3) *(2) (3) (3) (3) (3) *(2) (3)WORKERS COMPENSATION OR 233 136 97 42 44 20 43 27 58 74 61 61 68 11 6 107 DISABILITY CLAIMS 58% 62% 54% 55% 69% 80% 60% 63% 66% 67% 55% 68% 55% 58% 46% 63% (4) (4) (4) (4) (4) *(3) (4) (4) (4) (4) (4) (4) (4) (4) (4) (4) P U B L I C O P I N I O N S T R A T E G I E S
    • WORKPLACE WELLNESS INITIATIVES STUDY / 12430 / SEPTEMBER 2012 PAGE 16Table 6-1Summary of Priorities: % MeanBANNER 1 ORG HEALTH ORGANIZATION SIZE PROFIT STATUS REGION EMPLOYEES W/ CARE YEARS IN OPERATION GRADE ================= ================= ======================= ================== ======================= =========== NON- 100- PRIV- PUB- PROF/ NORTH MID- 0-10 11-20 21-50 51+ TOTAL 1-99 499 500+ ATE LIC GOVT -EAST SOUTH WEST WEST 0-74% 75-84% 85%+ YRS YRS YRS YRS A/B C/D/F ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----BASE=TOTAL ASKED 406 113 124 169 212 77 117 61 129 140 76 108 79 169 46 61 144 135 234 169 100% 28% 31% 42% 52% 19% 29% 15% 32% 34% 19% 27% 19% 42% 11% 15% 35% 33% 58% 42%HEALTH INSURANCE COSTS 8.8 8.7 8.8 8.9 8.8 8.8 8.9 8.8 8.7 8.9 8.8 9.0 8.7 8.9 8.3 8.4 8.8 9.0 8.7 9.0 (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1)DECREASED PRODUCTIVITY 8.2 8.2 8.2 8.3 8.3 8.3 8.0 8.4 8.2 8.1 8.5 8.3 8.0 8.3 8.1 8.1 8.3 8.2 8.3 8.1 (2) (2) (2) (3) (2) (2) (3) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) *(2)ABSENTEEISM 8.0 7.7 7.9 8.3 7.9 8.1 8.1 8.2 7.8 8.1 8.0 8.1 7.8 7.9 7.7 7.7 8.0 8.2 7.9 8.1 (3) (3) (3) (2) (3) (3) (2) (3) (3) (3) (3) (3) (3) (3) (3) (3) (3) (3) (3) *(2)WORKERS COMPENSATION OR 7.4 6.6 7.4 7.9 7.3 7.6 7.5 8.1 7.0 7.3 7.8 7.7 7.2 7.3 6.6 6.8 7.5 7.7 7.4 7.5 DISABILITY CLAIMS (4) (4) (4) (4) (4) (4) (4) (4) (4) (4) (4) (4) (4) (4) (4) (4) (4) (4) (4) (4) P U B L I C O P I N I O N S T R A T E G I E S
    • WORKPLACE WELLNESS INITIATIVES STUDY / 12430 / SEPTEMBER 2012 PAGE 17Table 6-2Summary of Priorities: % MeanBANNER 2 WELLNESS ROLE OF IMPORTANT ISSUES (%10) HEALTH CONCERNS (COMBINED) - BENEFICIAL STATE/LOCAL GOVT ROLE OF FED GOVT ======================== =============================== ================= ================= ================= DECR LACK HIGH NOT INSU- PROD- WORK- OBES- STRESS OF CHRON BLOOD VERY/ MORE LESS NO MORE LESS NO RANCE UCTI- ABSEN- ERS ITY/ /MEN- FIT- DIS- PRE- AT ACT- ACT- CHAN- ACT- ACT- CHAN- TOTAL COSTS VITY TEEISM COMP WEIGHT TAL NESS EASE SSURE VERY SMWT ALL IVE IVE GE IVE IVE GE ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ------ ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----BASE=TOTAL ASKED 406 197 140 120 110 211 207 205 133 136 154 199 51 184 60 148 152 79 157 100% 49% 34% 30% 27% 52% 51% 50% 33% 33% 38% 49% 13% 45% 15% 36% 37% 19% 39%HEALTH INSURANCE COSTS 8.8 10.0 9.5 9.3 9.6 8.8 8.9 8.8 8.9 8.9 9.1 8.8 8.0 8.8 8.9 8.8 8.8 8.9 8.7 (1) (1) (2) (3) (2) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1)DECREASED PRODUCTIVITY 8.2 8.7 10.0 9.7 9.2 8.2 8.2 8.1 8.1 8.3 8.6 8.1 7.6 8.3 8.2 8.1 8.4 7.9 8.2 (2) (2) (1) (2) (4) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2)ABSENTEEISM 8.0 8.5 9.4 10.0 9.2 8.0 7.9 7.9 8.0 7.8 8.3 8.0 7.2 8.1 7.7 7.8 8.2 7.6 7.9 (3) (3) (3) (1) (3) (3) (3) (3) (3) (3) (3) (3) (3) (3) (3) (3) (3) (3) (3)WORKERS COMPENSATION OR 7.4 8.2 8.7 9.0 10.0 7.5 7.3 7.4 7.4 7.2 7.8 7.4 6.4 7.5 7.5 7.2 7.5 7.1 7.3 DISABILITY CLAIMS (4) (4) (4) (4) (1) (4) (4) (4) (4) (4) (4) (4) (4) (4) (4) (4) (4) (4) (4) P U B L I C O P I N I O N S T R A T E G I E S
    • WORKPLACE WELLNESS INITIATIVES STUDY / 12430 / SEPTEMBER 2012 PAGE 18Table 6-3Summary of Priorities: % MeanBANNER 3 ------------------- AMONG THOSE WITH WELLNESS INITIATIVE --------------------- HAVE WELLNESS % OF YEARS FINANCIAL EMPLOYEE ACCESS INITATIVE OPERATING BUDGET IN OPERATION INCENTIVE ROI TO INITIATIVE =========== ================= ================= =========== =========== ================== 6% OR 1-2 3-4 5+ TOTAL YES NO 0-1% 2-5% MORE YRS YRS YRS YES NO YES NO 0-74% 75-84% 85%+ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ -----BASE=TOTAL ASKED 406 224 182 78 64 26 73 43 90 111 110 90 124 19 13 172 100% 55% 45% 35% 29% 12% 33% 19% 40% 50% 49% 40% 55% 8% 6% 77%HEALTH INSURANCE COSTS 8.8 8.9 8.7 8.8 8.9 8.7 9.0 9.1 8.7 9.1 8.8 9.0 8.8 9.5 8.4 8.8 (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1)DECREASED PRODUCTIVITY 8.2 8.3 8.1 8.2 8.6 8.5 8.5 8.1 8.4 8.3 8.3 8.6 8.1 8.7 7.1 8.5 (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (3) (2) (3) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (4) (2)ABSENTEEISM 8.0 8.1 7.8 7.7 8.6 8.7 8.1 8.2 8.1 8.2 8.0 8.5 7.8 8.5 7.5 8.2 (3) (3) (3) (3) (3) (2) (3) (2) (3) (3) (3) (3) (3) (3) *(2) (3)WORKERS COMPENSATION OR 7.4 7.8 7.0 7.5 8.0 8.3 7.7 7.8 7.9 8.0 7.5 8.1 7.5 7.7 7.5 7.7 DISABILITY CLAIMS (4) (4) (4) (4) (4) (4) (4) (4) (4) (4) (4) (4) (4) (4) *(2) (4) P U B L I C O P I N I O N S T R A T E G I E S
    • WORKPLACE WELLNESS INITIATIVES STUDY / 12430 / SEPTEMBER 2012 PAGE 19Table 7-1QUESTION 4:Below are some issues that may be impacted by employee health behaviors and conditions. Please rate the importance of these issues in terms of overall organization priorities.1 is Not Important At All To Your Organization, 10 is Extremely Important To Your Organization.Health insurance costsBANNER 1 ORG HEALTH ORGANIZATION SIZE PROFIT STATUS REGION EMPLOYEES W/ CARE YEARS IN OPERATION GRADE ================= ================= ======================= ================== ======================= =========== NON- 100- PRIV- PUB- PROF/ NORTH MID- 0-10 11-20 21-50 51+ TOTAL 1-99 499 500+ ATE LIC GOVT -EAST SOUTH WEST WEST 0-74% 75-84% 85%+ YRS YRS YRS YRS A/B C/D/F ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----BASE=TOTAL ASKED 404 112 123 169 210 77 117 61 129 138 76 108 79 169 45 61 144 135 233 168 100% 28% 30% 42% 52% 19% 29% 15% 32% 34% 19% 27% 20% 42% 11% 15% 36% 33% 58% 42%10 197 54 63 80 104 34 59 26 61 69 41 60 34 80 19 22 73 72 102 93-- 49% 48% 51% 47% 50% 44% 50% 43% 47% 50% 54% 56% 43% 47% 42% 36% 51% 53% 44% 55%8-10 340 93 102 145 172 66 102 50 106 122 62 92 64 147 35 48 119 119 194 144---- 84% 83% 83% 86% 82% 86% 87% 82% 82% 88% 82% 85% 81% 87% 78% 79% 83% 88% 83% 86%5-7 55 15 18 22 32 10 13 11 19 13 12 15 14 21 6 11 23 15 36 19--- 14% 13% 15% 13% 15% 13% 11% 18% 15% 9% 16% 14% 18% 12% 13% 18% 16% 11% 15% 11%1-4 9 4 3 2 6 1 2 - 4 3 2 1 1 1 4 2 2 1 3 5--- 2% 4% 2% 1% 3% 1% 2% - 3% 2% 3% 1% 1% 1% 9% 3% 1% 1% 1% 3% 9 74 19 21 34 38 18 18 16 23 27 8 19 19 28 6 13 27 23 44 30 18% 17% 17% 20% 18% 23% 15% 26% 18% 20% 11% 18% 24% 17% 13% 21% 19% 17% 19% 18% 8 69 20 18 31 30 14 25 8 22 26 13 13 11 39 10 13 19 24 48 21 17% 18% 15% 18% 14% 18% 21% 13% 17% 19% 17% 12% 14% 23% 22% 21% 13% 18% 21% 13% 7 30 6 12 12 18 4 8 7 9 6 8 8 6 13 4 5 11 10 15 15 7% 5% 10% 7% 9% 5% 7% 11% 7% 4% 11% 7% 8% 8% 9% 8% 8% 7% 6% 9% 6 14 6 1 7 8 5 1 2 4 5 3 3 5 5 1 3 8 2 13 1 3% 5% 1% 4% 4% 6% 1% 3% 3% 4% 4% 3% 6% 3% 2% 5% 6% 1% 6% 1% 5 11 3 5 3 6 1 4 2 6 2 1 4 3 3 1 3 4 3 8 3 3% 3% 4% 2% 3% 1% 3% 3% 5% 1% 1% 4% 4% 2% 2% 5% 3% 2% 3% 2% 4 2 2 - - 2 - - - - 2 - - - - 2 - - - 1 1 - 2% - - 1% - - - - 1% - - - - 4% - - - - 1% 3 3 - 2 1 1 - 2 - 1 - 2 1 1 - - 1 1 1 - 3 1% - 2% 1% - - 2% - 1% - 3% 1% 1% - - 2% 1% 1% - 2% 2 2 1 - 1 1 1 - - 1 1 - - - 1 2 - - - 2 - - 1% - 1% - 1% - - 1% 1% - - - 1% 4% - - - 1% - 1 2 1 1 - 2 - - - 2 - - - - - - 1 1 - - 1 - 1% 1% - 1% - - - 2% - - - - - - 2% 1% - - 1%MEAN 8.8 8.7 8.8 8.9 8.8 8.8 8.9 8.8 8.7 8.9 8.8 9.0 8.7 8.9 8.3 8.4 8.8 9.0 8.7 9.0MEDIAN 9.0 9.0 10.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 10.0 9.0 9.0 9.5 10.0 10.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 10.0 10.0 9.0 10.0 P U B L I C O P I N I O N S T R A T E G I E S
    • WORKPLACE WELLNESS INITIATIVES STUDY / 12430 / SEPTEMBER 2012 PAGE 20Table 7-2QUESTION 4:Below are some issues that may be impacted by employee health behaviors and conditions. Please rate the importance of these issues in terms of overall organization priorities.1 is Not Important At All To Your Organization, 10 is Extremely Important To Your Organization.Health insurance costsBANNER 2 WELLNESS ROLE OF IMPORTANT ISSUES (%10) HEALTH CONCERNS (COMBINED) - BENEFICIAL STATE/LOCAL GOVT ROLE OF FED GOVT ======================== =============================== ================= ================= ================= DECR LACK HIGH NOT INSU- PROD- WORK- OBES- STRESS OF CHRON BLOOD VERY/ MORE LESS NO MORE LESS NO RANCE UCTI- ABSEN- ERS ITY/ /MEN- FIT- DIS- PRE- AT ACT- ACT- CHAN- ACT- ACT- CHAN- TOTAL COSTS VITY TEEISM COMP WEIGHT TAL NESS EASE SSURE VERY SMWT ALL IVE IVE GE IVE IVE GE ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ------ ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----BASE=TOTAL ASKED 404 197 139 119 110 211 206 205 133 136 153 198 51 184 60 147 152 79 156 100% 49% 34% 29% 27% 52% 51% 51% 33% 34% 38% 49% 13% 46% 15% 36% 38% 20% 39%10 197 197 104 85 89 105 108 103 67 57 93 88 15 92 27 68 75 38 72-- 49% 100% 75% 71% 81% 50% 52% 50% 50% 42% 61% 44% 29% 50% 45% 46% 49% 48% 46%8-10 340 197 128 106 104 180 175 169 113 120 134 170 35 149 51 128 124 69 132---- 84% 100% 92% 89% 95% 85% 85% 82% 85% 88% 88% 86% 69% 81% 85% 87% 82% 87% 85%5-7 55 - 8 10 5 23 29 30 18 15 16 24 14 30 9 16 26 10 17--- 14% - 6% 8% 5% 11% 14% 15% 14% 11% 10% 12% 27% 16% 15% 11% 17% 13% 11%1-4 9 - 3 3 1 8 2 6 2 1 3 4 2 5 - 3 2 - 7--- 2% - 2% 3% 1% 4% 1% 3% 2% 1% 2% 2% 4% 3% - 2% 1% - 4% 9 74 - 18 14 9 39 30 35 27 32 19 48 7 30 13 30 27 16 29 18% - 13% 12% 8% 18% 15% 17% 20% 24% 12% 24% 14% 16% 22% 20% 18% 20% 19% 8 69 - 6 7 6 36 37 31 19 31 22 34 13 27 11 30 22 15 31 17% - 4% 6% 5% 17% 18% 15% 14% 23% 14% 17% 25% 15% 18% 20% 14% 19% 20% 7 30 - 8 7 3 15 16 13 11 8 10 12 8 17 5 8 15 5 10 7% - 6% 6% 3% 7% 8% 6% 8% 6% 7% 6% 16% 9% 8% 5% 10% 6% 6% 6 14 - - - 1 5 10 10 4 4 3 9 2 7 2 5 5 3 5 3% - - - 1% 2% 5% 5% 3% 3% 2% 5% 4% 4% 3% 3% 3% 4% 3% 5 11 - - 3 1 3 3 7 3 3 3 3 4 6 2 3 6 2 2 3% - - 3% 1% 1% 1% 3% 2% 2% 2% 2% 8% 3% 3% 2% 4% 3% 1% 4 2 - 1 1 - 1 - 1 - 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 - - 2 - - 1% 1% - - - - - 1% - 1% 2% 1% - 1% - - 1% 3 3 - 1 1 1 3 1 3 - - 1 2 - 3 - - 1 - 2 1% - 1% 1% 1% 1% - 1% - - 1% 1% - 2% - - 1% - 1% 2 2 - - - - 2 1 1 2 - 1 1 - 1 - 1 1 - 1 - - - - - 1% - - 2% - 1% 1% - 1% - 1% 1% - 1% 1 2 - 1 1 - 2 - 1 - - 1 - 1 - - 1 - - 2 - - 1% 1% - 1% - - - - 1% - 2% - - 1% - - 1%MEAN 8.8 10.0 9.5 9.3 9.6 8.8 8.9 8.8 8.9 8.9 9.1 8.8 8.0 8.8 8.9 8.8 8.8 8.9 8.7MEDIAN 9.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 9.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 9.0 10.0 9.0 8.0 9.5 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 P U B L I C O P I N I O N S T R A T E G I E S
    • WORKPLACE WELLNESS INITIATIVES STUDY / 12430 / SEPTEMBER 2012 PAGE 21Table 7-3QUESTION 4:Below are some issues that may be impacted by employee health behaviors and conditions. Please rate the importance of these issues in terms of overall organization priorities.1 is Not Important At All To Your Organization, 10 is Extremely Important To Your Organization.Health insurance costsBANNER 3 ------------------- AMONG THOSE WITH WELLNESS INITIATIVE --------------------- HAVE WELLNESS % OF YEARS FINANCIAL EMPLOYEE ACCESS INITATIVE OPERATING BUDGET IN OPERATION INCENTIVE ROI TO INITIATIVE =========== ================= ================= =========== =========== ================== 6% OR 1-2 3-4 5+ TOTAL YES NO 0-1% 2-5% MORE YRS YRS YRS YES NO YES NO 0-74% 75-84% 85%+ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ -----BASE=TOTAL ASKED 404 223 181 78 64 26 72 43 90 111 110 90 124 19 13 172 100% 55% 45% 35% 29% 12% 32% 19% 40% 50% 49% 40% 56% 9% 6% 77%10 197 112 85 34 33 14 42 23 39 60 52 47 59 15 5 80-- 49% 50% 47% 44% 52% 54% 58% 53% 43% 54% 47% 52% 48% 79% 38% 47%8-10 340 188 152 63 53 23 61 37 75 97 90 78 102 17 9 144---- 84% 84% 84% 81% 83% 88% 85% 86% 83% 87% 82% 87% 82% 89% 69% 84%5-7 55 33 22 14 11 2 10 6 14 14 19 12 21 2 4 26--- 14% 15% 12% 18% 17% 8% 14% 14% 16% 13% 17% 13% 17% 11% 31% 15%1-4 9 2 7 1 - 1 1 - 1 - 1 - 1 - - 2--- 2% 1% 4% 1% - 4% 1% - 1% - 1% - 1% - - 1% 9 74 35 39 16 7 4 10 8 13 19 16 15 19 1 2 31 18% 16% 22% 21% 11% 15% 14% 19% 14% 17% 15% 17% 15% 5% 15% 18% 8 69 41 28 13 13 5 9 6 23 18 22 16 24 1 2 33 17% 18% 15% 17% 20% 19% 13% 14% 26% 16% 20% 18% 19% 5% 15% 19% 7 30 18 12 9 6 - 7 4 6 8 10 5 13 2 2 14 7% 8% 7% 12% 9% - 10% 9% 7% 7% 9% 6% 10% 11% 15% 8% 6 14 9 5 4 3 - 1 2 5 4 5 5 4 - 1 7 3% 4% 3% 5% 5% - 1% 5% 6% 4% 5% 6% 3% - 8% 4% 5 11 6 5 1 2 2 2 - 3 2 4 2 4 - 1 5 3% 3% 3% 1% 3% 8% 3% - 3% 2% 4% 2% 3% - 8% 3% 4 2 1 1 1 - - 1 - - - 1 - 1 - - 1 - - 1% 1% - - 1% - - - 1% - 1% - - 1% 3 3 - 3 - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1% - 2% - - - - - - - - - - - - - 2 2 - 2 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1% - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1 2 1 1 - - 1 - - 1 - - - - - - 1 - - 1% - - 4% - - 1% - - - - - - 1%MEAN 8.8 8.9 8.7 8.8 8.9 8.7 9.0 9.1 8.7 9.1 8.8 9.0 8.8 9.5 8.4 8.8MEDIAN 9.0 10.0 9.0 9.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 9.0 10.0 9.0 10.0 9.0 10.0 9.0 9.0 P U B L I C O P I N I O N S T R A T E G I E S
    • WORKPLACE WELLNESS INITIATIVES STUDY / 12430 / SEPTEMBER 2012 PAGE 22Table 8-1QUESTION 5:Below are some issues that may be impacted by employee health behaviors and conditions. Please rate the importance of these issues in terms of overall organization priorities.1 is Not Important At All To Your Organization, 10 is Extremely Important To Your Organization.AbsenteeismBANNER 1 ORG HEALTH ORGANIZATION SIZE PROFIT STATUS REGION EMPLOYEES W/ CARE YEARS IN OPERATION GRADE ================= ================= ======================= ================== ======================= =========== NON- 100- PRIV- PUB- PROF/ NORTH MID- 0-10 11-20 21-50 51+ TOTAL 1-99 499 500+ ATE LIC GOVT -EAST SOUTH WEST WEST 0-74% 75-84% 85%+ YRS YRS YRS YRS A/B C/D/F ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----BASE=TOTAL ASKED 401 111 123 167 207 77 117 61 128 137 75 107 78 169 45 58 143 135 230 169 100% 28% 31% 42% 52% 19% 29% 15% 32% 34% 19% 27% 19% 42% 11% 14% 36% 34% 57% 42%10 120 36 33 51 61 17 42 16 34 46 24 30 22 53 13 13 39 48 67 53-- 30% 32% 27% 31% 29% 22% 36% 26% 27% 34% 32% 28% 28% 31% 29% 22% 27% 36% 29% 31%8-10 278 75 78 125 140 55 83 44 84 97 53 81 49 115 29 38 101 94 159 119---- 69% 68% 63% 75% 68% 71% 71% 72% 66% 71% 71% 76% 63% 68% 64% 66% 71% 70% 69% 70%5-7 92 21 36 35 48 18 26 14 32 31 15 18 23 40 10 14 31 33 50 40--- 23% 19% 29% 21% 23% 23% 22% 23% 25% 23% 20% 17% 29% 24% 22% 24% 22% 24% 22% 24%1-4 31 15 9 7 19 4 8 3 12 9 7 8 6 14 6 6 11 8 21 10--- 8% 14% 7% 4% 9% 5% 7% 5% 9% 7% 9% 7% 8% 8% 13% 10% 8% 6% 9% 6% 9 83 20 24 39 46 21 16 16 26 26 15 27 13 32 7 11 38 23 51 32 21% 18% 20% 23% 22% 27% 14% 26% 20% 19% 20% 25% 17% 19% 16% 19% 27% 17% 22% 19% 8 75 19 21 35 33 17 25 12 24 25 14 24 14 30 9 14 24 23 41 34 19% 17% 17% 21% 16% 22% 21% 20% 19% 18% 19% 22% 18% 18% 20% 24% 17% 17% 18% 20% 7 44 6 18 20 21 11 12 8 18 10 8 8 11 17 7 6 10 18 24 19 11% 5% 15% 12% 10% 14% 10% 13% 14% 7% 11% 7% 14% 10% 16% 10% 7% 13% 10% 11% 6 25 8 11 6 14 4 7 5 7 12 1 6 7 11 3 7 7 7 14 11 6% 7% 9% 4% 7% 5% 6% 8% 5% 9% 1% 6% 9% 7% 7% 12% 5% 5% 6% 7% 5 23 7 7 9 13 3 7 1 7 9 6 4 5 12 - 1 14 8 12 10 6% 6% 6% 5% 6% 4% 6% 2% 5% 7% 8% 4% 6% 7% - 2% 10% 6% 5% 6% 4 8 3 3 2 4 2 2 1 1 3 3 3 - 4 1 1 4 2 4 4 2% 3% 2% 1% 2% 3% 2% 2% 1% 2% 4% 3% - 2% 2% 2% 3% 1% 2% 2% 3 8 4 2 2 5 1 2 1 3 3 1 3 3 1 2 1 2 3 4 4 2% 4% 2% 1% 2% 1% 2% 2% 2% 2% 1% 3% 4% 1% 4% 2% 1% 2% 2% 2% 2 10 5 4 1 7 - 3 1 6 1 2 2 3 5 1 3 4 2 9 1 2% 5% 3% 1% 3% - 3% 2% 5% 1% 3% 2% 4% 3% 2% 5% 3% 1% 4% 1% 1 5 3 - 2 3 1 1 - 2 2 1 - - 4 2 1 1 1 4 1 1% 3% - 1% 1% 1% 1% - 2% 1% 1% - - 2% 4% 2% 1% 1% 2% 1%MEAN 8.0 7.7 7.9 8.3 7.9 8.1 8.1 8.2 7.8 8.1 8.0 8.1 7.8 7.9 7.7 7.7 8.0 8.2 7.9 8.1MEDIAN 9.0 9.0 8.0 9.0 9.0 8.0 8.0 9.0 8.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 8.0 9.0 8.0 8.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 P U B L I C O P I N I O N S T R A T E G I E S
    • WORKPLACE WELLNESS INITIATIVES STUDY / 12430 / SEPTEMBER 2012 PAGE 23Table 8-2QUESTION 5:Below are some issues that may be impacted by employee health behaviors and conditions. Please rate the importance of these issues in terms of overall organization priorities.1 is Not Important At All To Your Organization, 10 is Extremely Important To Your Organization.AbsenteeismBANNER 2 WELLNESS ROLE OF IMPORTANT ISSUES (%10) HEALTH CONCERNS (COMBINED) - BENEFICIAL STATE/LOCAL GOVT ROLE OF FED GOVT ======================== =============================== ================= ================= ================= DECR LACK HIGH NOT INSU- PROD- WORK- OBES- STRESS OF CHRON BLOOD VERY/ MORE LESS NO MORE LESS NO RANCE UCTI- ABSEN- ERS ITY/ /MEN- FIT- DIS- PRE- AT ACT- ACT- CHAN- ACT- ACT- CHAN- TOTAL COSTS VITY TEEISM COMP WEIGHT TAL NESS EASE SSURE VERY SMWT ALL IVE IVE GE IVE IVE GE ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ------ ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----BASE=TOTAL ASKED 401 196 139 120 108 208 205 202 132 136 151 198 50 183 59 146 150 78 155 100% 49% 35% 30% 27% 52% 51% 50% 33% 34% 38% 49% 12% 46% 15% 36% 37% 19% 39%10 120 85 98 120 76 62 56 62 45 33 59 50 10 64 12 37 51 19 41-- 30% 43% 71% 100% 70% 30% 27% 31% 34% 24% 39% 25% 20% 35% 20% 25% 34% 24% 26%8-10 278 155 134 120 95 140 142 139 86 91 115 134 28 128 41 99 109 48 106---- 69% 79% 96% 100% 88% 67% 69% 69% 65% 67% 76% 68% 56% 70% 69% 68% 73% 62% 68%5-7 92 29 2 - 9 55 49 44 36 34 26 52 14 45 10 34 31 21 37--- 23% 15% 1% - 8% 26% 24% 22% 27% 25% 17% 26% 28% 25% 17% 23% 21% 27% 24%1-4 31 12 3 - 4 13 14 19 10 11 10 12 8 10 8 13 10 9 12--- 8% 6% 2% - 4% 6% 7% 9% 8% 8% 7% 6% 16% 5% 14% 9% 7% 12% 8% 9 83 42 22 - 16 40 48 41 22 32 27 51 5 34 17 30 29 18 32 21% 21% 16% - 15% 19% 23% 20% 17% 24% 18% 26% 10% 19% 29% 21% 19% 23% 21% 8 75 28 14 - 3 38 38 36 19 26 29 33 13 30 12 32 29 11 33 19% 14% 10% - 3% 18% 19% 18% 14% 19% 19% 17% 26% 16% 20% 22% 19% 14% 21% 7 44 11 - - 4 28 18 21 22 15 9 25 10 20 7 14 15 10 17 11% 6% - - 4% 13% 9% 10% 17% 11% 6% 13% 20% 11% 12% 10% 10% 13% 11% 6 25 6 1 - 3 15 16 9 10 11 8 14 3 13 2 10 9 6 10 6% 3% 1% - 3% 7% 8% 4% 8% 8% 5% 7% 6% 7% 3% 7% 6% 8% 6% 5 23 12 1 - 2 12 15 14 4 8 9 13 1 12 1 10 7 5 10 6% 6% 1% - 2% 6% 7% 7% 3% 6% 6% 7% 2% 7% 2% 7% 5% 6% 6% 4 8 4 1 - 1 7 1 6 3 3 3 3 2 2 3 3 4 2 2 2% 2% 1% - 1% 3% - 3% 2% 2% 2% 2% 4% 1% 5% 2% 3% 3% 1% 3 8 3 1 - 2 4 3 5 - 2 1 4 2 3 2 3 1 3 4 2% 2% 1% - 2% 2% 1% 2% - 1% 1% 2% 4% 2% 3% 2% 1% 4% 3% 2 10 3 1 - - 1 6 7 3 5 4 5 1 4 1 5 5 1 4 2% 2% 1% - - - 3% 3% 2% 4% 3% 3% 2% 2% 2% 3% 3% 1% 3% 1 5 2 - - 1 1 4 1 4 1 2 - 3 1 2 2 - 3 2 1% 1% - - 1% - 2% - 3% 1% 1% - 6% 1% 3% 1% - 4% 1%MEAN 8.0 8.5 9.4 10.0 9.2 8.0 7.9 7.9 8.0 7.8 8.3 8.0 7.2 8.1 7.7 7.8 8.2 7.6 7.9MEDIAN 9.0 9.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 8.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 8.0 9.0 9.0 8.0 9.0 8.0 8.0 9.0 8.0 8.0 P U B L I C O P I N I O N S T R A T E G I E S
    • WORKPLACE WELLNESS INITIATIVES STUDY / 12430 / SEPTEMBER 2012 PAGE 24Table 8-3QUESTION 5:Below are some issues that may be impacted by employee health behaviors and conditions. Please rate the importance of these issues in terms of overall organization priorities.1 is Not Important At All To Your Organization, 10 is Extremely Important To Your Organization.AbsenteeismBANNER 3 ------------------- AMONG THOSE WITH WELLNESS INITIATIVE --------------------- HAVE WELLNESS % OF YEARS FINANCIAL EMPLOYEE ACCESS INITATIVE OPERATING BUDGET IN OPERATION INCENTIVE ROI TO INITIATIVE =========== ================= ================= =========== =========== ================== 6% OR 1-2 3-4 5+ TOTAL YES NO 0-1% 2-5% MORE YRS YRS YRS YES NO YES NO 0-74% 75-84% 85%+ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ -----BASE=TOTAL ASKED 401 221 180 76 64 25 72 43 88 110 109 89 123 19 13 169 100% 55% 45% 34% 29% 11% 33% 19% 40% 50% 49% 40% 56% 9% 6% 76%10 120 70 50 20 23 13 22 14 30 37 32 36 31 7 2 55-- 30% 32% 28% 26% 36% 52% 31% 33% 34% 34% 29% 40% 25% 37% 15% 33%8-10 278 156 122 46 51 21 51 31 61 85 70 71 78 14 7 122---- 69% 71% 68% 61% 80% 84% 71% 72% 69% 77% 64% 80% 63% 74% 54% 72%5-7 92 55 37 26 12 2 17 10 24 20 34 15 39 4 5 41--- 23% 25% 21% 34% 19% 8% 24% 23% 27% 18% 31% 17% 32% 21% 38% 24%1-4 31 10 21 4 1 2 4 2 3 5 5 3 6 1 1 6--- 8% 5% 12% 5% 2% 8% 6% 5% 3% 5% 5% 3% 5% 5% 8% 4% 9 83 44 39 9 16 5 15 10 14 22 22 20 21 4 1 36 21% 20% 22% 12% 25% 20% 21% 23% 16% 20% 20% 22% 17% 21% 8% 21% 8 75 42 33 17 12 3 14 7 17 26 16 15 26 3 4 31 19% 19% 18% 22% 19% 12% 19% 16% 19% 24% 15% 17% 21% 16% 31% 18% 7 44 25 19 9 7 2 7 5 11 6 18 7 17 4 3 15 11% 11% 11% 12% 11% 8% 10% 12% 13% 5% 17% 8% 14% 21% 23% 9% 6 25 13 12 9 2 - 3 3 7 8 5 2 11 - 2 11 6% 6% 7% 12% 3% - 4% 7% 8% 7% 5% 2% 9% - 15% 7% 5 23 17 6 8 3 - 7 2 6 6 11 6 11 - - 15 6% 8% 3% 11% 5% - 10% 5% 7% 5% 10% 7% 9% - - 9% 4 8 3 5 1 - - 1 1 - 1 2 1 1 - - 2 2% 1% 3% 1% - - 1% 2% - 1% 2% 1% 1% - - 1% 3 8 2 6 - 1 1 2 - - - 2 - 2 1 1 - 2% 1% 3% - 2% 4% 3% - - - 2% - 2% 5% 8% - 2 10 4 6 3 - 1 1 - 3 3 1 1 3 - - 4 2% 2% 3% 4% - 4% 1% - 3% 3% 1% 1% 2% - - 2% 1 5 1 4 - - - - 1 - 1 - 1 - - - - 1% - 2% - - - - 2% - 1% - 1% - - - -MEAN 8.0 8.1 7.8 7.7 8.6 8.7 8.1 8.2 8.1 8.2 8.0 8.5 7.8 8.5 7.5 8.2MEDIAN 9.0 9.0 8.0 8.0 9.0 10.0 9.0 9.0 8.5 9.0 8.0 9.0 8.0 9.0 8.0 9.0 P U B L I C O P I N I O N S T R A T E G I E S
    • WORKPLACE WELLNESS INITIATIVES STUDY / 12430 / SEPTEMBER 2012 PAGE 25Table 9-1QUESTION 6:Below are some issues that may be impacted by employee health behaviors and conditions. Please rate the importance of these issues in terms of overall organization priorities.1 is Not Important At All To Your Organization, 10 is Extremely Important To Your Organization.Decreased productivityBANNER 1 ORG HEALTH ORGANIZATION SIZE PROFIT STATUS REGION EMPLOYEES W/ CARE YEARS IN OPERATION GRADE ================= ================= ======================= ================== ======================= =========== NON- 100- PRIV- PUB- PROF/ NORTH MID- 0-10 11-20 21-50 51+ TOTAL 1-99 499 500+ ATE LIC GOVT -EAST SOUTH WEST WEST 0-74% 75-84% 85%+ YRS YRS YRS YRS A/B C/D/F ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----BASE=TOTAL ASKED 402 112 122 168 209 77 116 60 128 138 76 107 78 169 44 61 143 134 231 169 100% 28% 30% 42% 52% 19% 29% 15% 32% 34% 19% 27% 19% 42% 11% 15% 36% 33% 57% 42%10 140 41 42 57 76 27 37 19 42 47 32 33 24 65 14 18 55 46 82 57-- 35% 37% 34% 34% 36% 35% 32% 32% 33% 34% 42% 31% 31% 38% 32% 30% 38% 34% 35% 34%8-10 292 83 84 125 158 57 77 44 94 94 60 80 51 127 32 45 107 93 173 117---- 73% 74% 69% 74% 76% 74% 66% 73% 73% 68% 79% 75% 65% 75% 73% 74% 75% 69% 75% 69%5-7 87 22 30 35 38 17 32 13 27 36 11 22 22 31 9 12 27 35 46 41--- 22% 20% 25% 21% 18% 22% 28% 22% 21% 26% 14% 21% 28% 18% 20% 20% 19% 26% 20% 24%1-4 23 7 8 8 13 3 7 3 7 8 5 5 5 11 3 4 9 6 12 11--- 6% 6% 7% 5% 6% 4% 6% 5% 5% 6% 7% 5% 6% 7% 7% 7% 6% 4% 5% 7% 9 80 19 26 35 47 16 17 15 23 24 18 26 14 32 11 10 30 25 50 30 20% 17% 21% 21% 22% 21% 15% 25% 18% 17% 24% 24% 18% 19% 25% 16% 21% 19% 22% 18% 8 72 23 16 33 35 14 23 10 29 23 10 21 13 30 7 17 22 22 41 30 18% 21% 13% 20% 17% 18% 20% 17% 23% 17% 13% 20% 17% 18% 16% 28% 15% 16% 18% 18% 7 44 9 20 15 22 6 16 8 13 16 7 13 11 12 5 6 13 17 24 20 11% 8% 16% 9% 11% 8% 14% 13% 10% 12% 9% 12% 14% 7% 11% 10% 9% 13% 10% 12% 6 23 8 4 11 8 8 7 3 5 14 1 4 4 13 2 5 9 6 14 9 6% 7% 3% 7% 4% 10% 6% 5% 4% 10% 1% 4% 5% 8% 5% 8% 6% 4% 6% 5% 5 20 5 6 9 8 3 9 2 9 6 3 5 7 6 2 1 5 12 8 12 5% 4% 5% 5% 4% 4% 8% 3% 7% 4% 4% 5% 9% 4% 5% 2% 3% 9% 3% 7% 4 9 1 5 3 5 1 3 3 2 2 2 1 1 6 1 1 4 2 2 7 2% 1% 4% 2% 2% 1% 3% 5% 2% 1% 3% 1% 1% 4% 2% 2% 3% 1% 1% 4% 3 6 3 1 2 2 1 3 - 2 3 1 1 3 2 - 1 2 3 4 2 1% 3% 1% 1% 1% 1% 3% - 2% 2% 1% 1% 4% 1% - 2% 1% 2% 2% 1% 2 2 2 - - 2 - - - 2 - - 1 1 - - 2 - - 2 - - 2% - - 1% - - - 2% - - 1% 1% - - 3% - - 1% - 1 6 1 2 3 4 1 1 - 1 3 2 2 - 3 2 - 3 1 4 2 1% 1% 2% 2% 2% 1% 1% - 1% 2% 3% 2% - 2% 5% - 2% 1% 2% 1%MEAN 8.2 8.2 8.2 8.3 8.3 8.3 8.0 8.4 8.2 8.1 8.5 8.3 8.0 8.3 8.1 8.1 8.3 8.2 8.3 8.1MEDIAN 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 8.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 8.0 9.0 9.0 8.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 P U B L I C O P I N I O N S T R A T E G I E S
    • WORKPLACE WELLNESS INITIATIVES STUDY / 12430 / SEPTEMBER 2012 PAGE 26Table 9-2QUESTION 6:Below are some issues that may be impacted by employee health behaviors and conditions. Please rate the importance of these issues in terms of overall organization priorities.1 is Not Important At All To Your Organization, 10 is Extremely Important To Your Organization.Decreased productivityBANNER 2 WELLNESS ROLE OF IMPORTANT ISSUES (%10) HEALTH CONCERNS (COMBINED) - BENEFICIAL STATE/LOCAL GOVT ROLE OF FED GOVT ======================== =============================== ================= ================= ================= DECR LACK HIGH NOT INSU- PROD- WORK- OBES- STRESS OF CHRON BLOOD VERY/ MORE LESS NO MORE LESS NO RANCE UCTI- ABSEN- ERS ITY/ /MEN- FIT- DIS- PRE- AT ACT- ACT- CHAN- ACT- ACT- CHAN- TOTAL COSTS VITY TEEISM COMP WEIGHT TAL NESS EASE SSURE VERY SMWT ALL IVE IVE GE IVE IVE GE ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ------ ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----BASE=TOTAL ASKED 402 195 140 119 110 209 205 203 133 135 151 198 51 183 59 147 151 78 155 100% 49% 35% 30% 27% 52% 51% 50% 33% 34% 38% 49% 13% 46% 15% 37% 38% 19% 39%10 140 104 140 98 80 65 72 69 49 44 70 61 9 70 16 47 56 20 53-- 35% 53% 100% 82% 73% 31% 35% 34% 37% 33% 46% 31% 18% 38% 27% 32% 37% 26% 34%8-10 292 156 140 114 99 149 146 147 94 99 118 139 34 134 45 102 115 53 108---- 73% 80% 100% 96% 90% 71% 71% 72% 71% 73% 78% 70% 67% 73% 76% 69% 76% 68% 70%5-7 87 29 - 5 5 47 49 40 26 30 28 48 10 38 10 37 27 18 40--- 22% 15% - 4% 5% 22% 24% 20% 20% 22% 19% 24% 20% 21% 17% 25% 18% 23% 26%1-4 23 10 - - 6 13 10 16 13 6 5 11 7 11 4 8 9 7 7--- 6% 5% - - 5% 6% 5% 8% 10% 4% 3% 6% 14% 6% 7% 5% 6% 9% 5% 9 80 28 - 11 14 46 40 41 20 31 26 44 10 35 16 27 31 18 30 20% 14% - 9% 13% 22% 20% 20% 15% 23% 17% 22% 20% 19% 27% 18% 21% 23% 19% 8 72 24 - 5 5 38 34 37 25 24 22 34 15 29 13 28 28 15 25 18% 12% - 4% 5% 18% 17% 18% 19% 18% 15% 17% 29% 16% 22% 19% 19% 19% 16% 7 44 15 - 3 1 25 24 19 16 13 13 26 5 20 6 16 17 9 17 11% 8% - 3% 1% 12% 12% 9% 12% 10% 9% 13% 10% 11% 10% 11% 11% 12% 11% 6 23 9 - 2 1 11 14 11 8 10 6 13 4 9 2 12 5 5 13 6% 5% - 2% 1% 5% 7% 5% 6% 7% 4% 7% 8% 5% 3% 8% 3% 6% 8% 5 20 5 - - 3 11 11 10 2 7 9 9 1 9 2 9 5 4 10 5% 3% - - 3% 5% 5% 5% 2% 5% 6% 5% 2% 5% 3% 6% 3% 5% 6% 4 9 4 - - 1 6 3 6 6 3 2 2 5 4 2 3 4 3 2 2% 2% - - 1% 3% 1% 3% 5% 2% 1% 1% 10% 2% 3% 2% 3% 4% 1% 3 6 3 - - 2 5 2 5 2 2 - 6 - 5 - 1 2 2 2 1% 2% - - 2% 2% 1% 2% 2% 1% - 3% - 3% - 1% 1% 3% 1% 2 2 1 - - 1 - 1 2 1 - - 1 1 - - 2 - - 2 - 1% - - 1% - - 1% 1% - - 1% 2% - - 1% - - 1% 1 6 2 - - 2 2 4 3 4 1 3 2 1 2 2 2 3 2 1 1% 1% - - 2% 1% 2% 1% 3% 1% 2% 1% 2% 1% 3% 1% 2% 3% 1%MEAN 8.2 8.7 10.0 9.7 9.2 8.2 8.2 8.1 8.1 8.3 8.6 8.1 7.6 8.3 8.2 8.1 8.4 7.9 8.2MEDIAN 9.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 8.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 8.0 9.0 P U B L I C O P I N I O N S T R A T E G I E S
    • WORKPLACE WELLNESS INITIATIVES STUDY / 12430 / SEPTEMBER 2012 PAGE 27Table 9-3QUESTION 6:Below are some issues that may be impacted by employee health behaviors and conditions. Please rate the importance of these issues in terms of overall organization priorities.1 is Not Important At All To Your Organization, 10 is Extremely Important To Your Organization.Decreased productivityBANNER 3 ------------------- AMONG THOSE WITH WELLNESS INITIATIVE --------------------- HAVE WELLNESS % OF YEARS FINANCIAL EMPLOYEE ACCESS INITATIVE OPERATING BUDGET IN OPERATION INCENTIVE ROI TO INITIATIVE =========== ================= ================= =========== =========== ================== 6% OR 1-2 3-4 5+ TOTAL YES NO 0-1% 2-5% MORE YRS YRS YRS YES NO YES NO 0-74% 75-84% 85%+ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ -----BASE=TOTAL ASKED 402 222 180 78 64 25 72 43 89 110 110 89 124 18 13 171 100% 55% 45% 35% 29% 11% 32% 19% 40% 50% 50% 40% 56% 8% 6% 77%10 140 80 60 28 22 12 30 15 30 42 37 38 38 8 1 65-- 35% 36% 33% 36% 34% 48% 42% 35% 34% 38% 34% 43% 31% 44% 8% 38%8-10 292 164 128 54 53 20 55 31 66 85 77 74 82 14 7 130---- 73% 74% 71% 69% 83% 80% 76% 72% 74% 77% 70% 83% 66% 78% 54% 76%5-7 87 49 38 20 10 4 15 7 22 18 31 13 36 4 5 35--- 22% 22% 21% 26% 16% 16% 21% 16% 25% 16% 28% 15% 29% 22% 38% 20%1-4 23 9 14 4 1 1 2 5 1 7 2 2 6 - 1 6--- 6% 4% 8% 5% 2% 4% 3% 12% 1% 6% 2% 2% 5% - 8% 4% 9 80 43 37 11 17 3 13 10 17 21 22 20 21 2 1 37 20% 19% 21% 14% 27% 12% 18% 23% 19% 19% 20% 22% 17% 11% 8% 22% 8 72 41 31 15 14 5 12 6 19 22 18 16 23 4 5 28 18% 18% 17% 19% 22% 20% 17% 14% 21% 20% 16% 18% 19% 22% 38% 16% 7 44 23 21 11 4 1 8 3 10 7 16 4 19 2 2 17 11% 10% 12% 14% 6% 4% 11% 7% 11% 6% 15% 4% 15% 11% 15% 10% 6 23 13 10 5 4 2 1 3 8 7 6 4 9 2 1 9 6% 6% 6% 6% 6% 8% 1% 7% 9% 6% 5% 4% 7% 11% 8% 5% 5 20 13 7 4 2 1 6 1 4 4 9 5 8 - 2 9 5% 6% 4% 5% 3% 4% 8% 2% 4% 4% 8% 6% 6% - 15% 5% 4 9 5 4 3 - - 2 2 - 3 2 - 4 - - 4 2% 2% 2% 4% - - 3% 5% - 3% 2% - 3% - - 2% 3 6 2 4 1 1 - - 2 - 2 - - 2 - 1 1 1% 1% 2% 1% 2% - - 5% - 2% - - 2% - 8% 1% 2 2 - 2 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1% - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1 6 2 4 - - 1 - 1 1 2 - 2 - - - 1 1% 1% 2% - - 4% - 2% 1% 2% - 2% - - - 1%MEAN 8.2 8.3 8.1 8.2 8.6 8.5 8.5 8.1 8.4 8.3 8.3 8.6 8.1 8.7 7.1 8.5MEDIAN 9.0 9.0 9.0 8.5 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 8.0 9.0 8.0 9.0 P U B L I C O P I N I O N S T R A T E G I E S
    • WORKPLACE WELLNESS INITIATIVES STUDY / 12430 / SEPTEMBER 2012 PAGE 28Table 10-1QUESTION 7:Below are some issues that may be impacted by employee health behaviors and conditions. Please rate the importance of these issues in terms of overall organization priorities.1 is Not Important At All To Your Organization, 10 is Extremely Important To Your Organization.Workers compensation or disability claimsBANNER 1 ORG HEALTH ORGANIZATION SIZE PROFIT STATUS REGION EMPLOYEES W/ CARE YEARS IN OPERATION GRADE ================= ================= ======================= ================== ======================= =========== NON- 100- PRIV- PUB- PROF/ NORTH MID- 0-10 11-20 21-50 51+ TOTAL 1-99 499 500+ ATE LIC GOVT -EAST SOUTH WEST WEST 0-74% 75-84% 85%+ YRS YRS YRS YRS A/B C/D/F ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----BASE=TOTAL ASKED 402 111 122 169 208 77 117 60 128 138 76 107 79 169 45 61 142 135 232 168 100% 28% 30% 42% 52% 19% 29% 15% 32% 34% 19% 27% 20% 42% 11% 15% 35% 34% 58% 42%10 110 21 38 51 63 14 33 13 31 39 27 31 22 43 10 15 37 41 63 46-- 27% 19% 31% 30% 30% 18% 28% 22% 24% 28% 36% 29% 28% 25% 22% 25% 26% 30% 27% 27%8-10 233 54 68 111 117 45 71 38 65 80 50 66 42 98 22 33 81 82 131 101---- 58% 49% 56% 66% 56% 58% 61% 63% 51% 58% 66% 62% 53% 58% 49% 54% 57% 61% 56% 60%5-7 112 32 33 47 55 27 30 19 38 36 19 28 25 45 10 15 43 40 66 45--- 28% 29% 27% 28% 26% 35% 26% 32% 30% 26% 25% 26% 32% 27% 22% 25% 30% 30% 28% 27%1-4 57 25 21 11 36 5 16 3 25 22 7 13 12 26 13 13 18 13 35 22--- 14% 23% 17% 7% 17% 6% 14% 5% 20% 16% 9% 12% 15% 15% 29% 21% 13% 10% 15% 13% 9 59 14 18 27 30 17 12 18 16 15 10 20 6 26 4 10 26 15 32 27 15% 13% 15% 16% 14% 22% 10% 30% 13% 11% 13% 19% 8% 15% 9% 16% 18% 11% 14% 16% 8 64 19 12 33 24 14 26 7 18 26 13 15 14 29 8 8 18 26 36 28 16% 17% 10% 20% 12% 18% 22% 12% 14% 19% 17% 14% 18% 17% 18% 13% 13% 19% 16% 17% 7 50 13 15 22 23 12 15 12 16 14 8 11 10 21 3 2 19 22 32 18 12% 12% 12% 13% 11% 16% 13% 20% 13% 10% 11% 10% 13% 12% 7% 3% 13% 16% 14% 11% 6 24 8 8 8 11 9 4 6 8 8 2 7 6 10 5 3 10 6 14 10 6% 7% 7% 5% 5% 12% 3% 10% 6% 6% 3% 7% 8% 6% 11% 5% 7% 4% 6% 6% 5 38 11 10 17 21 6 11 1 14 14 9 10 9 14 2 10 14 12 20 17 9% 10% 8% 10% 10% 8% 9% 2% 11% 10% 12% 9% 11% 8% 4% 16% 10% 9% 9% 10% 4 19 4 9 6 11 3 5 2 9 6 2 6 3 9 5 2 7 5 12 7 5% 4% 7% 4% 5% 4% 4% 3% 7% 4% 3% 6% 4% 5% 11% 3% 5% 4% 5% 4% 3 14 6 6 2 9 1 4 1 6 7 - 3 4 3 2 2 5 5 6 8 3% 5% 5% 1% 4% 1% 3% 2% 5% 5% - 3% 5% 2% 4% 3% 4% 4% 3% 5% 2 14 7 5 2 10 - 4 - 7 4 3 4 3 6 2 6 4 2 10 4 3% 6% 4% 1% 5% - 3% - 5% 3% 4% 4% 4% 4% 4% 10% 3% 1% 4% 2% 1 10 8 1 1 6 1 3 - 3 5 2 - 2 8 4 3 2 1 7 3 2% 7% 1% 1% 3% 1% 3% - 2% 4% 3% - 3% 5% 9% 5% 1% 1% 3% 2%MEAN 7.4 6.6 7.4 7.9 7.3 7.6 7.5 8.1 7.0 7.3 7.8 7.7 7.2 7.3 6.6 6.8 7.5 7.7 7.4 7.5MEDIAN 8.0 7.0 8.0 8.0 8.0 8.0 8.0 9.0 8.0 8.0 8.0 8.0 8.0 8.0 7.0 8.0 8.0 8.0 8.0 8.0 P U B L I C O P I N I O N S T R A T E G I E S
    • WORKPLACE WELLNESS INITIATIVES STUDY / 12430 / SEPTEMBER 2012 PAGE 29Table 10-2QUESTION 7:Below are some issues that may be impacted by employee health behaviors and conditions. Please rate the importance of these issues in terms of overall organization priorities.1 is Not Important At All To Your Organization, 10 is Extremely Important To Your Organization.Workers compensation or disability claimsBANNER 2 WELLNESS ROLE OF IMPORTANT ISSUES (%10) HEALTH CONCERNS (COMBINED) - BENEFICIAL STATE/LOCAL GOVT ROLE OF FED GOVT ======================== =============================== ================= ================= ================= DECR LACK HIGH NOT INSU- PROD- WORK- OBES- STRESS OF CHRON BLOOD VERY/ MORE LESS NO MORE LESS NO RANCE UCTI- ABSEN- ERS ITY/ /MEN- FIT- DIS- PRE- AT ACT- ACT- CHAN- ACT- ACT- CHAN- TOTAL COSTS VITY TEEISM COMP WEIGHT TAL NESS EASE SSURE VERY SMWT ALL IVE IVE GE IVE IVE GE ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ------ ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----BASE=TOTAL ASKED 402 196 139 119 110 210 206 205 132 135 151 198 51 184 60 146 151 79 155 100% 49% 35% 30% 27% 52% 51% 51% 33% 34% 38% 49% 13% 46% 15% 36% 38% 20% 39%10 110 89 80 76 110 57 60 62 38 25 54 47 9 58 13 34 49 15 39-- 27% 45% 58% 64% 100% 27% 29% 30% 29% 19% 36% 24% 18% 32% 22% 23% 32% 19% 25%8-10 233 138 112 102 110 127 111 118 77 74 97 114 22 113 35 76 90 42 87---- 58% 70% 81% 86% 100% 60% 54% 58% 58% 55% 64% 58% 43% 61% 58% 52% 60% 53% 56%5-7 112 38 21 13 - 55 66 53 37 37 39 56 15 44 17 49 39 24 46--- 28% 19% 15% 11% - 26% 32% 26% 28% 27% 26% 28% 29% 24% 28% 34% 26% 30% 30%1-4 57 20 6 4 - 28 29 34 18 24 15 28 14 27 8 21 22 13 22--- 14% 10% 4% 3% - 13% 14% 17% 14% 18% 10% 14% 27% 15% 13% 14% 15% 16% 14% 9 59 26 19 14 - 37 22 22 22 24 18 35 6 24 13 20 17 14 25 15% 13% 14% 12% - 18% 11% 11% 17% 18% 12% 18% 12% 13% 22% 14% 11% 18% 16% 8 64 23 13 12 - 33 29 34 17 25 25 32 7 31 9 22 24 13 23 16% 12% 9% 10% - 16% 14% 17% 13% 19% 17% 16% 14% 17% 15% 15% 16% 16% 15% 7 50 19 8 6 - 24 28 26 17 15 16 27 7 16 9 23 17 10 21 12% 10% 6% 5% - 11% 14% 13% 13% 11% 11% 14% 14% 9% 15% 16% 11% 13% 14% 6 24 7 5 3 - 11 15 9 7 10 7 15 1 12 - 12 10 3 11 6% 4% 4% 3% - 5% 7% 4% 5% 7% 5% 8% 2% 7% - 8% 7% 4% 7% 5 38 12 8 4 - 20 23 18 13 12 16 14 7 16 8 14 12 11 14 9% 6% 6% 3% - 10% 11% 9% 10% 9% 11% 7% 14% 9% 13% 10% 8% 14% 9% 4 19 8 1 2 - 8 7 12 3 10 6 9 4 9 4 6 9 6 4 5% 4% 1% 2% - 4% 3% 6% 2% 7% 4% 5% 8% 5% 7% 4% 6% 8% 3% 3 14 6 2 2 - 7 8 6 5 9 4 6 4 6 3 4 2 4 8 3% 3% 1% 2% - 3% 4% 3% 4% 7% 3% 3% 8% 3% 5% 3% 1% 5% 5% 2 14 2 - - - 8 6 9 6 5 2 8 4 5 1 8 6 1 7 3% 1% - - - 4% 3% 4% 5% 4% 1% 4% 8% 3% 2% 5% 4% 1% 5% 1 10 4 3 - - 5 8 7 4 - 3 5 2 7 - 3 5 2 3 2% 2% 2% - - 2% 4% 3% 3% - 2% 3% 4% 4% - 2% 3% 3% 2%MEAN 7.4 8.2 8.7 9.0 10.0 7.5 7.3 7.4 7.4 7.2 7.8 7.4 6.4 7.5 7.5 7.2 7.5 7.1 7.3MEDIAN 8.0 9.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 8.0 8.0 8.0 8.0 8.0 8.0 8.0 7.0 8.0 8.0 8.0 8.0 8.0 8.0 P U B L I C O P I N I O N S T R A T E G I E S
    • WORKPLACE WELLNESS INITIATIVES STUDY / 12430 / SEPTEMBER 2012 PAGE 30Table 10-3QUESTION 7:Below are some issues that may be impacted by employee health behaviors and conditions. Please rate the importance of these issues in terms of overall organization priorities.1 is Not Important At All To Your Organization, 10 is Extremely Important To Your Organization.Workers compensation or disability claimsBANNER 3 ------------------- AMONG THOSE WITH WELLNESS INITIATIVE --------------------- HAVE WELLNESS % OF YEARS FINANCIAL EMPLOYEE ACCESS INITATIVE OPERATING BUDGET IN OPERATION INCENTIVE ROI TO INITIATIVE =========== ================= ================= =========== =========== ================== 6% OR 1-2 3-4 5+ TOTAL YES NO 0-1% 2-5% MORE YRS YRS YRS YES NO YES NO 0-74% 75-84% 85%+ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ -----BASE=TOTAL ASKED 402 221 181 77 64 25 72 43 88 110 110 90 123 19 13 170 100% 55% 45% 35% 29% 11% 33% 19% 40% 50% 50% 41% 56% 9% 6% 77%10 110 67 43 23 20 8 21 15 27 36 31 33 29 4 2 53-- 27% 30% 24% 30% 31% 32% 29% 35% 31% 33% 28% 37% 24% 21% 15% 31%8-10 233 136 97 42 44 20 43 27 58 74 61 61 68 11 6 107---- 58% 62% 54% 55% 69% 80% 60% 63% 66% 67% 55% 68% 55% 58% 46% 63%5-7 112 66 46 27 16 3 20 13 23 29 37 23 43 6 7 46--- 28% 30% 25% 35% 25% 12% 28% 30% 26% 26% 34% 26% 35% 32% 54% 27%1-4 57 19 38 8 4 2 9 3 7 7 12 6 12 2 - 17--- 14% 9% 21% 10% 6% 8% 13% 7% 8% 6% 11% 7% 10% 11% - 10% 9 59 28 31 7 10 5 11 5 10 13 15 12 16 4 1 22 15% 13% 17% 9% 16% 20% 15% 12% 11% 12% 14% 13% 13% 21% 8% 13% 8 64 41 23 12 14 7 11 7 21 25 15 16 23 3 3 32 16% 19% 13% 16% 22% 28% 15% 16% 24% 23% 14% 18% 19% 16% 23% 19% 7 50 33 17 13 7 1 10 5 11 15 18 11 22 5 4 19 12% 15% 9% 17% 11% 4% 14% 12% 13% 14% 16% 12% 18% 26% 31% 11% 6 24 13 11 5 5 1 4 4 5 8 5 6 7 1 1 11 6% 6% 6% 6% 8% 4% 6% 9% 6% 7% 5% 7% 6% 5% 8% 6% 5 38 20 18 9 4 1 6 4 7 6 14 6 14 - 2 16 9% 9% 10% 12% 6% 4% 8% 9% 8% 5% 13% 7% 11% - 15% 9% 4 19 8 11 2 1 2 5 1 2 3 5 5 3 - - 8 5% 4% 6% 3% 2% 8% 7% 2% 2% 3% 5% 6% 2% - - 5% 3 14 7 7 3 3 - 3 - 4 2 5 1 6 2 - 5 3% 3% 4% 4% 5% - 4% - 5% 2% 5% 1% 5% 11% - 3% 2 14 3 11 2 - - 1 1 1 1 2 - 2 - - 3 3% 1% 6% 3% - - 1% 2% 1% 1% 2% - 2% - - 2% 1 10 1 9 1 - - - 1 - 1 - - 1 - - 1 2% - 5% 1% - - - 2% - 1% - - 1% - - 1%MEAN 7.4 7.8 7.0 7.5 8.0 8.3 7.7 7.8 7.9 8.0 7.5 8.1 7.5 7.7 7.5 7.7MEDIAN 8.0 8.0 8.0 8.0 8.0 9.0 8.0 8.0 8.0 8.0 8.0 8.5 8.0 8.0 7.0 8.0 P U B L I C O P I N I O N S T R A T E G I E S
    • WORKPLACE WELLNESS INITIATIVES STUDY / 12430 / SEPTEMBER 2012 PAGE 31Table 11-1QUESTION 8F:Which from the list below do you consider to be the top three health conditions or areas that you feel are the greatest concern to your employees? Rank them in terms of yourfirst, second and third choice.First Choice.BANNER 1 ORG HEALTH ORGANIZATION SIZE PROFIT STATUS REGION EMPLOYEES W/ CARE YEARS IN OPERATION GRADE ================= ================= ======================= ================== ======================= =========== NON- 100- PRIV- PUB- PROF/ NORTH MID- 0-10 11-20 21-50 51+ TOTAL 1-99 499 500+ ATE LIC GOVT -EAST SOUTH WEST WEST 0-74% 75-84% 85%+ YRS YRS YRS YRS A/B C/D/F ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----BASE=TOTAL ASKED 405 113 123 169 211 77 117 61 129 139 76 108 79 169 46 61 144 135 234 168 100% 28% 30% 42% 52% 19% 29% 15% 32% 34% 19% 27% 20% 42% 11% 15% 36% 33% 58% 41%OBESITY/OVERWEIGHT 96 15 28 53 45 22 29 14 29 38 15 31 21 34 6 15 28 40 48 47 24% 13% 23% 31% 21% 29% 25% 23% 22% 27% 20% 29% 27% 20% 13% 25% 19% 30% 21% 28%STRESS AND OTHER MENTAL 94 31 26 37 47 14 33 12 26 32 24 21 16 40 9 12 39 29 66 27HEALTH ISSUES 23% 27% 21% 22% 22% 18% 28% 20% 20% 23% 32% 19% 20% 24% 20% 20% 27% 21% 28% 16%LACK OF EXERCISE/FITNESS 61 19 24 18 35 12 14 11 19 20 11 13 12 35 7 9 26 18 35 26 15% 17% 20% 11% 17% 16% 12% 18% 15% 14% 14% 12% 15% 21% 15% 15% 18% 13% 15% 15%CHRONIC DISEASES 44 12 12 20 18 10 16 8 17 17 2 10 10 18 3 7 16 16 23 21 11% 11% 10% 12% 9% 13% 14% 13% 13% 12% 3% 9% 13% 11% 7% 11% 11% 12% 10% 13%HIGH BLOOD PRESSURE 39 8 10 21 19 9 11 5 19 11 4 12 5 19 2 8 12 15 19 20 10% 7% 8% 12% 9% 12% 9% 8% 15% 8% 5% 11% 6% 11% 4% 13% 8% 11% 8% 12%TOBACCO USE 27 9 11 7 21 2 4 7 7 11 2 12 5 7 9 6 5 6 16 11 7% 8% 9% 4% 10% 3% 3% 11% 5% 8% 3% 11% 6% 4% 20% 10% 3% 4% 7% 7%WORKPLACE INJURIES 26 12 4 10 13 5 8 3 7 4 12 6 4 12 3 2 11 9 17 8 6% 11% 3% 6% 6% 6% 7% 5% 5% 3% 16% 6% 5% 7% 7% 3% 8% 7% 7% 5%POOR NUTRITION 6 3 3 - 5 - 1 1 1 2 2 - 4 1 3 1 2 - 2 4 1% 3% 2% - 2% - 1% 2% 1% 1% 3% - 5% 1% 7% 2% 1% - 1% 2%COLD AND FLU VACCINATIONS 5 3 2 - 4 - 1 - 2 1 2 1 1 1 2 1 2 - 3 2 1% 3% 2% - 2% - 1% - 2% 1% 3% 1% 1% 1% 4% 2% 1% - 1% 1%ALCOHOL AND SUBSTANCE ABUSE 4 1 2 1 3 1 - - 1 2 1 2 1 - 2 - 2 - 4 - 1% 1% 2% 1% 1% 1% - - 1% 1% 1% 2% 1% - 4% - 1% - 2% -HIGH CHOLESTEROL 3 - 1 2 1 2 - - 1 1 1 - - 2 - - 1 2 1 2 1% - 1% 1% - 3% - - 1% 1% 1% - - 1% - - 1% 1% - 1% P U B L I C O P I N I O N S T R A T E G I E S
    • WORKPLACE WELLNESS INITIATIVES STUDY / 12430 / SEPTEMBER 2012 PAGE 32Table 11-2QUESTION 8F:Which from the list below do you consider to be the top three health conditions or areas that you feel are the greatest concern to your employees? Rank them in terms of yourfirst, second and third choice.First Choice.BANNER 2 WELLNESS ROLE OF IMPORTANT ISSUES (%10) HEALTH CONCERNS (COMBINED) - BENEFICIAL STATE/LOCAL GOVT ROLE OF FED GOVT ======================== =============================== ================= ================= ================= DECR LACK HIGH NOT INSU- PROD- WORK- OBES- STRESS OF CHRON BLOOD VERY/ MORE LESS NO MORE LESS NO RANCE UCTI- ABSEN- ERS ITY/ /MEN- FIT- DIS- PRE- AT ACT- ACT- CHAN- ACT- ACT- CHAN- TOTAL COSTS VITY TEEISM COMP WEIGHT TAL NESS EASE SSURE VERY SMWT ALL IVE IVE GE IVE IVE GE ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ------ ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----BASE=TOTAL ASKED 405 197 139 119 110 211 207 205 133 136 153 199 51 184 60 148 152 79 157 100% 49% 34% 29% 27% 52% 51% 51% 33% 34% 38% 49% 13% 45% 15% 37% 38% 20% 39%OBESITY/OVERWEIGHT 96 40 30 25 30 96 35 44 25 29 41 47 8 42 16 35 33 20 39 24% 20% 22% 21% 27% 45% 17% 21% 19% 21% 27% 24% 16% 23% 27% 24% 22% 25% 25%STRESS AND OTHER MENTAL 94 39 28 23 21 28 94 50 26 22 38 43 13 40 19 32 36 19 36HEALTH ISSUES 23% 20% 20% 19% 19% 13% 45% 24% 20% 16% 25% 22% 25% 22% 32% 22% 24% 24% 23%LACK OF EXERCISE/FITNESS 61 35 19 17 14 30 25 61 13 8 25 27 8 33 7 20 29 10 21 15% 18% 14% 14% 13% 14% 12% 30% 10% 6% 16% 14% 16% 18% 12% 14% 19% 13% 13%CHRONIC DISEASES 44 25 17 18 14 23 12 13 44 20 12 29 3 19 5 17 13 10 19 11% 13% 12% 15% 13% 11% 6% 6% 33% 15% 8% 15% 6% 10% 8% 11% 9% 13% 12%HIGH BLOOD PRESSURE 39 20 17 12 7 15 10 14 12 39 15 19 5 21 2 16 19 4 14 10% 10% 12% 10% 6% 7% 5% 7% 9% 29% 10% 10% 10% 11% 3% 11% 13% 5% 9%TOBACCO USE 27 15 7 7 7 10 10 11 3 5 6 15 6 12 5 9 6 8 12 7% 8% 5% 6% 6% 5% 5% 5% 2% 4% 4% 8% 12% 7% 8% 6% 4% 10% 8%WORKPLACE INJURIES 26 14 12 10 12 7 11 6 7 8 10 13 3 12 4 9 11 6 7 6% 7% 9% 8% 11% 3% 5% 3% 5% 6% 7% 7% 6% 7% 7% 6% 7% 8% 4%POOR NUTRITION 6 2 1 1 1 1 3 3 - 1 2 2 1 3 - 3 3 - 2 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% - 1% 1% - 1% 1% 1% 2% 2% - 2% 2% - 1%COLD AND FLU VACCINATIONS 5 3 5 5 3 1 2 3 2 - 1 1 3 1 - 3 1 - 3 1% 2% 4% 4% 3% - 1% 1% 2% - 1% 1% 6% 1% - 2% 1% - 2%ALCOHOL AND SUBSTANCE ABUSE 4 2 1 - - - 3 - 1 1 1 2 1 - 1 3 - 1 3 1% 1% 1% - - - 1% - 1% 1% 1% 1% 2% - 2% 2% - 1% 2%HIGH CHOLESTEROL 3 2 2 1 1 - 2 - - 3 2 1 - 1 1 1 1 1 1 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% - 1% - - 2% 1% 1% - 1% 2% 1% 1% 1% 1% P U B L I C O P I N I O N S T R A T E G I E S
    • WORKPLACE WELLNESS INITIATIVES STUDY / 12430 / SEPTEMBER 2012 PAGE 33Table 11-3QUESTION 8F:Which from the list below do you consider to be the top three health conditions or areas that you feel are the greatest concern to your employees? Rank them in terms of yourfirst, second and third choice.First Choice.BANNER 3 ------------------- AMONG THOSE WITH WELLNESS INITIATIVE --------------------- HAVE WELLNESS % OF YEARS FINANCIAL EMPLOYEE ACCESS INITATIVE OPERATING BUDGET IN OPERATION INCENTIVE ROI TO INITIATIVE =========== ================= ================= =========== =========== ================== 6% OR 1-2 3-4 5+ TOTAL YES NO 0-1% 2-5% MORE YRS YRS YRS YES NO YES NO 0-74% 75-84% 85%+ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ -----BASE=TOTAL ASKED 405 223 182 78 64 26 72 43 90 111 110 90 124 19 13 172 100% 55% 45% 35% 29% 12% 32% 19% 40% 50% 49% 40% 56% 9% 6% 77%OBESITY/OVERWEIGHT 96 62 34 24 16 9 23 14 22 36 25 28 29 5 3 50 24% 28% 19% 31% 25% 35% 32% 33% 24% 32% 23% 31% 23% 26% 23% 29%STRESS AND OTHER MENTAL 94 54 40 16 12 6 18 9 19 25 28 22 31 3 3 39HEALTH ISSUES 23% 24% 22% 21% 19% 23% 25% 21% 21% 23% 25% 24% 25% 16% 23% 23%LACK OF EXERCISE/FITNESS 61 31 30 9 17 1 6 9 15 16 15 12 18 3 2 25 15% 14% 16% 12% 27% 4% 8% 21% 17% 14% 14% 13% 15% 16% 15% 15%CHRONIC DISEASES 44 22 22 10 8 1 7 4 11 10 12 9 12 3 2 16 11% 10% 12% 13% 13% 4% 10% 9% 12% 9% 11% 10% 10% 16% 15% 9%HIGH BLOOD PRESSURE 39 23 16 7 5 4 5 4 11 16 7 11 12 2 1 20 10% 10% 9% 9% 8% 15% 7% 9% 12% 14% 6% 12% 10% 11% 8% 12%TOBACCO USE 27 10 17 5 2 1 3 1 6 3 7 1 9 - - 9 7% 4% 9% 6% 3% 4% 4% 2% 7% 3% 6% 1% 7% - - 5%WORKPLACE INJURIES 26 13 13 5 2 2 5 1 5 2 11 4 8 2 - 9 6% 6% 7% 6% 3% 8% 7% 2% 6% 2% 10% 4% 6% 11% - 5%POOR NUTRITION 6 3 3 2 - 1 3 - - - 3 - 3 - 2 1 1% 1% 2% 3% - 4% 4% - - - 3% - 2% - 15% 1%COLD AND FLU VACCINATIONS 5 - 5 - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1% - 3% - - - - - - - - - - - - -ALCOHOL AND SUBSTANCE ABUSE 4 2 2 - 1 - 1 - 1 1 1 1 1 - - 2 1% 1% 1% - 2% - 1% - 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% - - 1%HIGH CHOLESTEROL 3 3 - - 1 1 1 1 - 2 1 2 1 1 - 1 1% 1% - - 2% 4% 1% 2% - 2% 1% 2% 1% 5% - 1% P U B L I C O P I N I O N S T R A T E G I E S
    • WORKPLACE WELLNESS INITIATIVES STUDY / 12430 / SEPTEMBER 2012 PAGE 34Table 12-1QUESTION 8S:Which from the list below do you consider to be the top three health conditions or areas that you feel are the greatest concern to your employees? Rank them in terms of yourfirst, second and third choice.Second Choice.BANNER 1 ORG HEALTH ORGANIZATION SIZE PROFIT STATUS REGION EMPLOYEES W/ CARE YEARS IN OPERATION GRADE ================= ================= ======================= ================== ======================= =========== NON- 100- PRIV- PUB- PROF/ NORTH MID- 0-10 11-20 21-50 51+ TOTAL 1-99 499 500+ ATE LIC GOVT -EAST SOUTH WEST WEST 0-74% 75-84% 85%+ YRS YRS YRS YRS A/B C/D/F ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----BASE=TOTAL ASKED 405 113 123 169 211 77 117 61 129 139 76 108 79 169 46 61 144 135 234 168 100% 28% 30% 42% 52% 19% 29% 15% 32% 34% 19% 27% 20% 42% 11% 15% 36% 33% 58% 41%LACK OF EXERCISE/FITNESS 77 21 22 34 45 14 18 14 17 33 13 22 19 24 6 16 28 23 40 37 19% 19% 18% 20% 21% 18% 15% 23% 13% 24% 17% 20% 24% 14% 13% 26% 19% 17% 17% 22%OBESITY/OVERWEIGHT 68 21 23 24 34 7 27 8 22 23 15 15 14 33 7 8 24 27 32 35 17% 19% 19% 14% 16% 9% 23% 13% 17% 17% 20% 14% 18% 20% 15% 13% 17% 20% 14% 21%STRESS AND OTHER MENTAL 57 10 20 27 30 13 14 13 22 16 6 13 9 33 7 7 21 18 35 22HEALTH ISSUES 14% 9% 16% 16% 14% 17% 12% 21% 17% 12% 8% 12% 11% 20% 15% 11% 15% 13% 15% 13%HIGH BLOOD PRESSURE 50 13 16 21 28 10 12 7 20 16 7 11 8 23 5 10 16 16 29 21 12% 12% 13% 12% 13% 13% 10% 11% 16% 12% 9% 10% 10% 14% 11% 16% 11% 12% 12% 13%CHRONIC DISEASES 46 10 15 21 20 8 18 10 11 16 9 15 12 12 3 5 15 18 29 16 11% 9% 12% 12% 9% 10% 15% 16% 9% 12% 12% 14% 15% 7% 7% 8% 10% 13% 12% 10%POOR NUTRITION 28 13 9 6 20 1 7 4 10 9 5 10 6 10 7 6 8 7 16 12 7% 12% 7% 4% 9% 1% 6% 7% 8% 6% 7% 9% 8% 6% 15% 10% 6% 5% 7% 7%HIGH CHOLESTEROL 27 10 5 12 12 9 6 2 10 10 5 5 2 17 2 3 12 9 17 10 7% 9% 4% 7% 6% 12% 5% 3% 8% 7% 7% 5% 3% 10% 4% 5% 8% 7% 7% 6%COLD AND FLU VACCINATIONS 19 9 3 7 7 6 6 1 6 6 6 4 6 5 4 2 5 8 15 4 5% 8% 2% 4% 3% 8% 5% 2% 5% 4% 8% 4% 8% 3% 9% 3% 3% 6% 6% 2%TOBACCO USE 14 - 5 9 5 8 1 1 6 3 4 6 1 7 2 2 9 1 7 7 3% - 4% 5% 2% 10% 1% 2% 5% 2% 5% 6% 1% 4% 4% 3% 6% 1% 3% 4%WORKPLACE INJURIES 9 2 4 3 4 1 4 1 1 5 2 5 1 2 1 1 4 3 6 3 2% 2% 3% 2% 2% 1% 3% 2% 1% 4% 3% 5% 1% 1% 2% 2% 3% 2% 3% 2%ALCOHOL AND SUBSTANCE ABUSE 9 3 1 5 6 - 3 - 3 2 4 2 1 2 2 1 2 4 8 - 2% 3% 1% 3% 3% - 3% - 2% 1% 5% 2% 1% 1% 4% 2% 1% 3% 3% - P U B L I C O P I N I O N S T R A T E G I E S
    • WORKPLACE WELLNESS INITIATIVES STUDY / 12430 / SEPTEMBER 2012 PAGE 35Table 12-2QUESTION 8S:Which from the list below do you consider to be the top three health conditions or areas that you feel are the greatest concern to your employees? Rank them in terms of yourfirst, second and third choice.Second Choice.BANNER 2 WELLNESS ROLE OF IMPORTANT ISSUES (%10) HEALTH CONCERNS (COMBINED) - BENEFICIAL STATE/LOCAL GOVT ROLE OF FED GOVT ======================== =============================== ================= ================= ================= DECR LACK HIGH NOT INSU- PROD- WORK- OBES- STRESS OF CHRON BLOOD VERY/ MORE LESS NO MORE LESS NO RANCE UCTI- ABSEN- ERS ITY/ /MEN- FIT- DIS- PRE- AT ACT- ACT- CHAN- ACT- ACT- CHAN- TOTAL COSTS VITY TEEISM COMP WEIGHT TAL NESS EASE SSURE VERY SMWT ALL IVE IVE GE IVE IVE GE ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ------ ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----BASE=TOTAL ASKED 405 197 139 119 110 211 207 205 133 136 153 199 51 184 60 148 152 79 157 100% 49% 34% 29% 27% 52% 51% 51% 33% 34% 38% 49% 13% 45% 15% 37% 38% 20% 39%LACK OF EXERCISE/FITNESS 77 36 26 26 28 32 44 77 11 16 29 34 14 35 7 31 29 9 33 19% 18% 19% 22% 25% 15% 21% 38% 8% 12% 19% 17% 27% 19% 12% 21% 19% 11% 21%OBESITY/OVERWEIGHT 68 44 22 22 18 68 27 35 22 16 31 29 7 37 9 21 27 13 26 17% 22% 16% 18% 16% 32% 13% 17% 17% 12% 20% 15% 14% 20% 15% 14% 18% 16% 17%STRESS AND OTHER MENTAL 57 34 24 17 17 29 57 29 12 10 25 24 8 27 6 24 26 12 19HEALTH ISSUES 14% 17% 17% 14% 15% 14% 28% 14% 9% 7% 16% 12% 16% 15% 10% 16% 17% 15% 12%HIGH BLOOD PRESSURE 50 17 15 11 10 26 13 6 19 50 17 28 5 20 11 18 16 13 21 12% 9% 11% 9% 9% 12% 6% 3% 14% 37% 11% 14% 10% 11% 18% 12% 11% 16% 13%CHRONIC DISEASES 46 18 15 13 13 18 24 14 46 20 12 26 8 15 9 19 12 11 19 11% 9% 11% 11% 12% 9% 12% 7% 35% 15% 8% 13% 16% 8% 15% 13% 8% 14% 12%POOR NUTRITION 28 16 11 10 7 10 7 22 3 4 14 12 2 19 1 8 16 2 10 7% 8% 8% 8% 6% 5% 3% 11% 2% 3% 9% 6% 4% 10% 2% 5% 11% 3% 6%HIGH CHOLESTEROL 27 13 12 8 7 7 8 7 8 16 10 15 1 11 4 11 10 5 11 7% 7% 9% 7% 6% 3% 4% 3% 6% 12% 7% 8% 2% 6% 7% 7% 7% 6% 7%COLD AND FLU VACCINATIONS 19 5 6 4 2 2 11 9 4 1 4 14 1 11 1 6 8 3 5 5% 3% 4% 3% 2% 1% 5% 4% 3% 1% 3% 7% 2% 6% 2% 4% 5% 4% 3%TOBACCO USE 14 4 3 3 2 10 3 3 4 3 5 6 3 5 3 6 4 2 8 3% 2% 2% 3% 2% 5% 1% 1% 3% 2% 3% 3% 6% 3% 5% 4% 3% 3% 5%WORKPLACE INJURIES 9 6 1 1 4 3 9 2 2 - 3 6 - 2 4 3 3 4 2 2% 3% 1% 1% 4% 1% 4% 1% 2% - 2% 3% - 1% 7% 2% 2% 5% 1%ALCOHOL AND SUBSTANCE ABUSE 9 4 4 4 2 6 3 1 2 - 3 5 1 2 4 1 1 4 3 2% 2% 3% 3% 2% 3% 1% - 2% - 2% 3% 2% 1% 7% 1% 1% 5% 2% P U B L I C O P I N I O N S T R A T E G I E S
    • WORKPLACE WELLNESS INITIATIVES STUDY / 12430 / SEPTEMBER 2012 PAGE 36Table 12-3QUESTION 8S:Which from the list below do you consider to be the top three health conditions or areas that you feel are the greatest concern to your employees? Rank them in terms of yourfirst, second and third choice.Second Choice.BANNER 3 ------------------- AMONG THOSE WITH WELLNESS INITIATIVE --------------------- HAVE WELLNESS % OF YEARS FINANCIAL EMPLOYEE ACCESS INITATIVE OPERATING BUDGET IN OPERATION INCENTIVE ROI TO INITIATIVE =========== ================= ================= =========== =========== ================== 6% OR 1-2 3-4 5+ TOTAL YES NO 0-1% 2-5% MORE YRS YRS YRS YES NO YES NO 0-74% 75-84% 85%+ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ -----BASE=TOTAL ASKED 405 223 182 78 64 26 72 43 90 111 110 90 124 19 13 172 100% 55% 45% 35% 29% 12% 32% 19% 40% 50% 49% 40% 56% 9% 6% 77%LACK OF EXERCISE/FITNESS 77 45 32 17 8 6 20 6 14 20 24 16 26 4 1 37 19% 20% 18% 22% 13% 23% 28% 14% 16% 18% 22% 18% 21% 21% 8% 22%OBESITY/OVERWEIGHT 68 41 27 16 14 3 13 10 15 18 23 18 21 2 1 35 17% 18% 15% 21% 22% 12% 18% 23% 17% 16% 21% 20% 17% 11% 8% 20%STRESS AND OTHER MENTAL 57 36 21 16 10 1 12 5 17 14 22 14 20 4 2 28HEALTH ISSUES 14% 16% 12% 21% 16% 4% 17% 12% 19% 13% 20% 16% 16% 21% 15% 16%HIGH BLOOD PRESSURE 50 28 22 7 9 4 8 8 11 18 10 14 14 2 4 20 12% 13% 12% 9% 14% 15% 11% 19% 12% 16% 9% 16% 11% 11% 31% 12%CHRONIC DISEASES 46 24 22 7 8 3 7 4 11 17 7 8 15 2 1 17 11% 11% 12% 9% 13% 12% 10% 9% 12% 15% 6% 9% 12% 11% 8% 10%POOR NUTRITION 28 8 20 2 4 - 3 1 3 5 3 4 4 - 2 6 7% 4% 11% 3% 6% - 4% 2% 3% 5% 3% 4% 3% - 15% 3%HIGH CHOLESTEROL 27 16 11 5 5 4 4 3 9 10 6 10 6 2 2 10 7% 7% 6% 6% 8% 15% 6% 7% 10% 9% 5% 11% 5% 11% 15% 6%COLD AND FLU VACCINATIONS 19 6 13 2 - 2 - 2 2 2 4 1 5 - - 4 5% 3% 7% 3% - 8% - 5% 2% 2% 4% 1% 4% - - 2%TOBACCO USE 14 10 4 4 3 2 4 - 5 3 7 3 7 2 - 8 3% 4% 2% 5% 5% 8% 6% - 6% 3% 6% 3% 6% 11% - 5%WORKPLACE INJURIES 9 3 6 - 1 - 1 1 1 1 2 - 3 1 - 1 2% 1% 3% - 2% - 1% 2% 1% 1% 2% - 2% 5% - 1%ALCOHOL AND SUBSTANCE ABUSE 9 6 3 2 2 1 - 3 2 3 2 2 3 - - 6 2% 3% 2% 3% 3% 4% - 7% 2% 3% 2% 2% 2% - - 3% P U B L I C O P I N I O N S T R A T E G I E S
    • WORKPLACE WELLNESS INITIATIVES STUDY / 12430 / SEPTEMBER 2012 PAGE 37Table 13-1QUESTION 8T:Which from the list below do you consider to be the top three health conditions or areas that you feel are the greatest concern to your employees? Rank them in terms of yourfirst, second and third choice.Third Choice.BANNER 1 ORG HEALTH ORGANIZATION SIZE PROFIT STATUS REGION EMPLOYEES W/ CARE YEARS IN OPERATION GRADE ================= ================= ======================= ================== ======================= =========== NON- 100- PRIV- PUB- PROF/ NORTH MID- 0-10 11-20 21-50 51+ TOTAL 1-99 499 500+ ATE LIC GOVT -EAST SOUTH WEST WEST 0-74% 75-84% 85%+ YRS YRS YRS YRS A/B C/D/F ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----BASE=TOTAL ASKED 405 113 123 169 211 77 117 61 129 139 76 108 79 169 46 61 144 135 234 168 100% 28% 30% 42% 52% 19% 29% 15% 32% 34% 19% 27% 20% 42% 11% 15% 36% 33% 58% 41%LACK OF EXERCISE/FITNESS 67 21 16 30 36 9 22 10 21 21 15 19 12 30 8 13 18 25 41 26 17% 19% 13% 18% 17% 12% 19% 16% 16% 15% 20% 18% 15% 18% 17% 21% 13% 19% 18% 15%STRESS AND OTHER MENTAL 56 13 15 28 22 15 19 3 15 25 13 18 10 19 9 7 19 19 31 25HEALTH ISSUES 14% 12% 12% 17% 10% 19% 16% 5% 12% 18% 17% 17% 13% 11% 20% 11% 13% 14% 13% 15%HIGH BLOOD PRESSURE 47 13 16 18 28 8 11 8 15 17 7 11 11 21 6 4 16 17 27 19 12% 12% 13% 11% 13% 10% 9% 13% 12% 12% 9% 10% 14% 12% 13% 7% 11% 13% 12% 11%OBESITY/OVERWEIGHT 47 9 15 23 23 10 14 9 17 15 6 15 6 22 4 6 23 13 21 26 12% 8% 12% 14% 11% 13% 12% 15% 13% 11% 8% 14% 8% 13% 9% 10% 16% 10% 9% 15%CHRONIC DISEASES 43 13 12 18 21 9 13 6 13 11 13 11 10 16 7 8 15 12 24 19 11% 12% 10% 11% 10% 12% 11% 10% 10% 8% 17% 10% 13% 9% 15% 13% 10% 9% 10% 11%POOR NUTRITION 35 12 12 11 19 6 10 7 9 16 3 9 8 12 4 4 15 11 22 12 9% 11% 10% 7% 9% 8% 9% 11% 7% 12% 4% 8% 10% 7% 9% 7% 10% 8% 9% 7%TOBACCO USE 33 12 10 11 15 9 9 4 11 13 5 9 5 14 2 6 14 10 17 16 8% 11% 8% 7% 7% 12% 8% 7% 9% 9% 7% 8% 6% 8% 4% 10% 10% 7% 7% 10%WORKPLACE INJURIES 22 2 6 14 14 6 2 5 5 11 1 6 6 8 2 2 8 9 12 10 5% 2% 5% 8% 7% 8% 2% 8% 4% 8% 1% 6% 8% 5% 4% 3% 6% 7% 5% 6%HIGH CHOLESTEROL 22 8 8 6 13 1 8 2 13 4 3 6 6 8 - 5 6 9 16 6 5% 7% 7% 4% 6% 1% 7% 3% 10% 3% 4% 6% 8% 5% - 8% 4% 7% 7% 4%COLD AND FLU VACCINATIONS 16 5 9 2 13 - 3 4 4 3 5 1 3 9 2 5 5 2 12 3 4% 4% 7% 1% 6% - 3% 7% 3% 2% 7% 1% 4% 5% 4% 8% 3% 1% 5% 2%ALCOHOL AND SUBSTANCE ABUSE 15 3 4 8 6 4 5 3 5 3 4 3 2 8 2 1 5 6 10 5 4% 3% 3% 5% 3% 5% 4% 5% 4% 2% 5% 3% 3% 5% 4% 2% 3% 4% 4% 3% P U B L I C O P I N I O N S T R A T E G I E S
    • WORKPLACE WELLNESS INITIATIVES STUDY / 12430 / SEPTEMBER 2012 PAGE 38Table 13-2QUESTION 8T:Which from the list below do you consider to be the top three health conditions or areas that you feel are the greatest concern to your employees? Rank them in terms of yourfirst, second and third choice.Third Choice.BANNER 2 WELLNESS ROLE OF IMPORTANT ISSUES (%10) HEALTH CONCERNS (COMBINED) - BENEFICIAL STATE/LOCAL GOVT ROLE OF FED GOVT ======================== =============================== ================= ================= ================= DECR LACK HIGH NOT INSU- PROD- WORK- OBES- STRESS OF CHRON BLOOD VERY/ MORE LESS NO MORE LESS NO RANCE UCTI- ABSEN- ERS ITY/ /MEN- FIT- DIS- PRE- AT ACT- ACT- CHAN- ACT- ACT- CHAN- TOTAL COSTS VITY TEEISM COMP WEIGHT TAL NESS EASE SSURE VERY SMWT ALL IVE IVE GE IVE IVE GE ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ------ ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----BASE=TOTAL ASKED 405 197 139 119 110 211 207 205 133 136 153 199 51 184 60 148 152 79 157 100% 49% 34% 29% 27% 52% 51% 51% 33% 34% 38% 49% 13% 45% 15% 37% 38% 20% 39%LACK OF EXERCISE/FITNESS 67 32 24 19 20 39 35 67 18 10 36 28 3 39 10 18 29 14 23 17% 16% 17% 16% 18% 18% 17% 33% 14% 7% 24% 14% 6% 21% 17% 12% 19% 18% 15%STRESS AND OTHER MENTAL 56 35 20 16 22 24 56 25 16 12 19 33 4 25 4 25 21 7 23HEALTH ISSUES 14% 18% 14% 13% 20% 11% 27% 12% 12% 9% 12% 17% 8% 14% 7% 17% 14% 9% 15%HIGH BLOOD PRESSURE 47 20 12 10 8 23 21 14 18 47 15 25 7 18 8 17 14 9 20 12% 10% 9% 8% 7% 11% 10% 7% 14% 35% 10% 13% 14% 10% 13% 11% 9% 11% 13%OBESITY/OVERWEIGHT 47 21 13 15 9 47 19 22 15 19 18 25 4 24 6 16 18 10 18 12% 11% 9% 13% 8% 22% 9% 11% 11% 14% 12% 13% 8% 13% 10% 11% 12% 13% 11%CHRONIC DISEASES 43 24 17 14 11 21 18 15 43 9 15 20 8 14 6 21 11 8 22 11% 12% 12% 12% 10% 10% 9% 7% 32% 7% 10% 10% 16% 8% 10% 14% 7% 10% 14%POOR NUTRITION 35 14 15 12 11 17 16 20 3 4 9 21 4 18 3 14 15 6 14 9% 7% 11% 10% 10% 8% 8% 10% 2% 3% 6% 11% 8% 10% 5% 9% 10% 8% 9%TOBACCO USE 33 15 11 9 7 12 12 18 4 8 12 17 4 14 8 11 12 8 11 8% 8% 8% 8% 6% 6% 6% 9% 3% 6% 8% 9% 8% 8% 13% 7% 8% 10% 7%WORKPLACE INJURIES 22 11 8 7 9 9 8 8 4 8 7 9 6 7 7 6 8 8 5 5% 6% 6% 6% 8% 4% 4% 4% 3% 6% 5% 5% 12% 4% 12% 4% 5% 10% 3%HIGH CHOLESTEROL 22 11 9 8 6 9 4 3 7 16 10 8 4 14 - 7 9 2 10 5% 6% 6% 7% 5% 4% 2% 1% 5% 12% 7% 4% 8% 8% - 5% 6% 3% 6%COLD AND FLU VACCINATIONS 16 3 2 2 2 4 8 9 2 2 6 7 3 5 3 7 8 2 6 4% 2% 1% 2% 2% 2% 4% 4% 2% 1% 4% 4% 6% 3% 5% 5% 5% 3% 4%ALCOHOL AND SUBSTANCE ABUSE 15 11 8 7 5 6 8 4 3 1 6 6 2 6 4 5 6 4 5 4% 6% 6% 6% 5% 3% 4% 2% 2% 1% 4% 3% 4% 3% 7% 3% 4% 5% 3% P U B L I C O P I N I O N S T R A T E G I E S
    • WORKPLACE WELLNESS INITIATIVES STUDY / 12430 / SEPTEMBER 2012 PAGE 39Table 13-3QUESTION 8T:Which from the list below do you consider to be the top three health conditions or areas that you feel are the greatest concern to your employees? Rank them in terms of yourfirst, second and third choice.Third Choice.BANNER 3 ------------------- AMONG THOSE WITH WELLNESS INITIATIVE --------------------- HAVE WELLNESS % OF YEARS FINANCIAL EMPLOYEE ACCESS INITATIVE OPERATING BUDGET IN OPERATION INCENTIVE ROI TO INITIATIVE =========== ================= ================= =========== =========== ================== 6% OR 1-2 3-4 5+ TOTAL YES NO 0-1% 2-5% MORE YRS YRS YRS YES NO YES NO 0-74% 75-84% 85%+ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ -----BASE=TOTAL ASKED 405 223 182 78 64 26 72 43 90 111 110 90 124 19 13 172 100% 55% 45% 35% 29% 12% 32% 19% 40% 50% 49% 40% 56% 9% 6% 77%LACK OF EXERCISE/FITNESS 67 37 30 12 13 3 11 7 16 18 19 16 19 3 3 28 17% 17% 16% 15% 20% 12% 15% 16% 18% 16% 17% 18% 15% 16% 23% 16%STRESS AND OTHER MENTAL 56 29 27 6 10 6 7 5 12 17 12 12 14 4 - 21HEALTH ISSUES 14% 13% 15% 8% 16% 23% 10% 12% 13% 15% 11% 13% 11% 21% - 12%HIGH BLOOD PRESSURE 47 29 18 15 6 2 11 5 11 14 14 8 20 2 1 22 12% 13% 10% 19% 9% 8% 15% 12% 12% 13% 13% 9% 16% 11% 8% 13%OBESITY/OVERWEIGHT 47 26 21 9 7 4 5 8 12 16 10 10 16 2 4 20 12% 12% 12% 12% 11% 15% 7% 19% 13% 14% 9% 11% 13% 11% 31% 12%CHRONIC DISEASES 43 23 20 9 7 1 8 5 8 9 14 10 13 3 1 16 11% 10% 11% 12% 11% 4% 11% 12% 9% 8% 13% 11% 10% 16% 8% 9%POOR NUTRITION 35 15 20 5 5 1 9 1 4 3 12 5 10 1 1 13 9% 7% 11% 6% 8% 4% 13% 2% 4% 3% 11% 6% 8% 5% 8% 8%TOBACCO USE 33 22 11 9 6 3 6 6 10 14 8 9 13 2 1 18 8% 10% 6% 12% 9% 12% 8% 14% 11% 13% 7% 10% 10% 11% 8% 10%WORKPLACE INJURIES 22 13 9 2 4 1 3 3 6 8 5 9 4 - - 11 5% 6% 5% 3% 6% 4% 4% 7% 7% 7% 5% 10% 3% - - 6%HIGH CHOLESTEROL 22 9 13 5 1 1 4 - 4 7 2 3 5 - - 8 5% 4% 7% 6% 2% 4% 6% - 4% 6% 2% 3% 4% - - 5%COLD AND FLU VACCINATIONS 16 9 7 3 3 1 3 2 3 2 6 2 5 - - 9 4% 4% 4% 4% 5% 4% 4% 5% 3% 2% 5% 2% 4% - - 5%ALCOHOL AND SUBSTANCE ABUSE 15 11 4 3 2 3 5 1 4 3 8 6 5 2 2 6 4% 5% 2% 4% 3% 12% 7% 2% 4% 3% 7% 7% 4% 11% 15% 3% P U B L I C O P I N I O N S T R A T E G I E S
    • WORKPLACE WELLNESS INITIATIVES STUDY / 12430 / SEPTEMBER 2012 PAGE 40Table 14-1QUESTION 8C:Which from the list below do you consider to be the top three health conditions or areas that you feel are the greatest concern to your employees? Rank them in terms of yourfirst, second and third choice.Combined Choice.BANNER 1 ORG HEALTH ORGANIZATION SIZE PROFIT STATUS REGION EMPLOYEES W/ CARE YEARS IN OPERATION GRADE ================= ================= ======================= ================== ======================= =========== NON- 100- PRIV- PUB- PROF/ NORTH MID- 0-10 11-20 21-50 51+ TOTAL 1-99 499 500+ ATE LIC GOVT -EAST SOUTH WEST WEST 0-74% 75-84% 85%+ YRS YRS YRS YRS A/B C/D/F ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----BASE=TOTAL ASKED 405 113 123 169 211 77 117 61 129 139 76 108 79 169 46 61 144 135 234 168 100% 28% 30% 42% 52% 19% 29% 15% 32% 34% 19% 27% 20% 42% 11% 15% 36% 33% 58% 41%OBESITY/OVERWEIGHT 211 45 66 100 102 39 70 31 68 76 36 61 41 89 17 29 75 80 101 108 52% 40% 54% 59% 48% 51% 60% 51% 53% 55% 47% 56% 52% 53% 37% 48% 52% 59% 43% 64%STRESS AND OTHER MENTAL 207 54 61 92 99 42 66 28 63 73 43 52 35 92 25 26 79 66 132 74HEALTH ISSUES 51% 48% 50% 54% 47% 55% 56% 46% 49% 53% 57% 48% 44% 54% 54% 43% 55% 49% 56% 44%LACK OF EXERCISE/FITNESS 205 61 62 82 116 35 54 35 57 74 39 54 43 89 21 38 72 66 116 89 51% 54% 50% 49% 55% 45% 46% 57% 44% 53% 51% 50% 54% 53% 46% 62% 50% 49% 50% 53%HIGH BLOOD PRESSURE 136 34 42 60 75 27 34 20 54 44 18 34 24 63 13 22 44 48 75 60 34% 30% 34% 36% 36% 35% 29% 33% 42% 32% 24% 31% 30% 37% 28% 36% 31% 36% 32% 36%CHRONIC DISEASES 133 35 39 59 59 27 47 24 41 44 24 36 32 46 13 20 46 46 76 56 33% 31% 32% 35% 28% 35% 40% 39% 32% 32% 32% 33% 41% 27% 28% 33% 32% 34% 32% 33%TOBACCO USE 74 21 26 27 41 19 14 12 24 27 11 27 11 28 13 14 28 17 40 34 18% 19% 21% 16% 19% 25% 12% 20% 19% 19% 14% 25% 14% 17% 28% 23% 19% 13% 17% 20%POOR NUTRITION 69 28 24 17 44 7 18 12 20 27 10 19 18 23 14 11 25 18 40 28 17% 25% 20% 10% 21% 9% 15% 20% 16% 19% 13% 18% 23% 14% 30% 18% 17% 13% 17% 17%WORKPLACE INJURIES 57 16 14 27 31 12 14 9 13 20 15 17 11 22 6 5 23 21 35 21 14% 14% 11% 16% 15% 16% 12% 15% 10% 14% 20% 16% 14% 13% 13% 8% 16% 16% 15% 13%HIGH CHOLESTEROL 52 18 14 20 26 12 14 4 24 15 9 11 8 27 2 8 19 20 34 18 13% 16% 11% 12% 12% 16% 12% 7% 19% 11% 12% 10% 10% 16% 4% 13% 13% 15% 15% 11%COLD AND FLU VACCINATIONS 39 16 14 9 23 6 10 5 12 9 13 6 10 15 7 8 12 10 29 9 10% 14% 11% 5% 11% 8% 9% 8% 9% 6% 17% 6% 13% 9% 15% 13% 8% 7% 12% 5%ALCOHOL AND SUBSTANCE ABUSE 28 7 7 14 15 5 8 3 9 7 9 7 4 10 6 2 9 10 22 5 7% 6% 6% 8% 7% 6% 7% 5% 7% 5% 12% 6% 5% 6% 13% 3% 6% 7% 9% 3% P U B L I C O P I N I O N S T R A T E G I E S
    • WORKPLACE WELLNESS INITIATIVES STUDY / 12430 / SEPTEMBER 2012 PAGE 41Table 14-2QUESTION 8C:Which from the list below do you consider to be the top three health conditions or areas that you feel are the greatest concern to your employees? Rank them in terms of yourfirst, second and third choice.Combined Choice.BANNER 2 WELLNESS ROLE OF IMPORTANT ISSUES (%10) HEALTH CONCERNS (COMBINED) - BENEFICIAL STATE/LOCAL GOVT ROLE OF FED GOVT ======================== =============================== ================= ================= ================= DECR LACK HIGH NOT INSU- PROD- WORK- OBES- STRESS OF CHRON BLOOD VERY/ MORE LESS NO MORE LESS NO RANCE UCTI- ABSEN- ERS ITY/ /MEN- FIT- DIS- PRE- AT ACT- ACT- CHAN- ACT- ACT- CHAN- TOTAL COSTS VITY TEEISM COMP WEIGHT TAL NESS EASE SSURE VERY SMWT ALL IVE IVE GE IVE IVE GE ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ------ ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----BASE=TOTAL ASKED 405 197 139 119 110 211 207 205 133 136 153 199 51 184 60 148 152 79 157 100% 49% 34% 29% 27% 52% 51% 51% 33% 34% 38% 49% 13% 45% 15% 37% 38% 20% 39%OBESITY/OVERWEIGHT 211 105 65 62 57 211 81 101 62 64 90 101 19 103 31 72 78 43 83 52% 53% 47% 52% 52% 100% 39% 49% 47% 47% 59% 51% 37% 56% 52% 49% 51% 54% 53%STRESS AND OTHER MENTAL 207 108 72 56 60 81 207 104 54 44 82 100 25 92 29 81 83 38 78HEALTH ISSUES 51% 55% 52% 47% 55% 38% 100% 51% 41% 32% 54% 50% 49% 50% 48% 55% 55% 48% 50%LACK OF EXERCISE/FITNESS 205 103 69 62 62 101 104 205 42 34 90 89 25 107 24 69 87 33 77 51% 52% 50% 52% 56% 48% 50% 100% 32% 25% 59% 45% 49% 58% 40% 47% 57% 42% 49%HIGH BLOOD PRESSURE 136 57 44 33 25 64 44 34 49 136 47 72 17 59 21 51 49 26 55 34% 29% 32% 28% 23% 30% 21% 17% 37% 100% 31% 36% 33% 32% 35% 34% 32% 33% 35%CHRONIC DISEASES 133 67 49 45 38 62 54 42 133 49 39 75 19 48 20 57 36 29 60 33% 34% 35% 38% 35% 29% 26% 20% 100% 36% 25% 38% 37% 26% 33% 39% 24% 37% 38%TOBACCO USE 74 34 21 19 16 32 25 32 11 16 23 38 13 31 16 26 22 18 31 18% 17% 15% 16% 15% 15% 12% 16% 8% 12% 15% 19% 25% 17% 27% 18% 14% 23% 20%POOR NUTRITION 69 32 27 23 19 28 26 45 6 9 25 35 7 40 4 25 34 8 26 17% 16% 19% 19% 17% 13% 13% 22% 5% 7% 16% 18% 14% 22% 7% 17% 22% 10% 17%WORKPLACE INJURIES 57 31 21 18 25 19 28 16 13 16 20 28 9 21 15 18 22 18 14 14% 16% 15% 15% 23% 9% 14% 8% 10% 12% 13% 14% 18% 11% 25% 12% 14% 23% 9%HIGH CHOLESTEROL 52 26 23 17 14 16 14 10 15 35 22 24 5 26 5 19 20 8 22 13% 13% 17% 14% 13% 8% 7% 5% 11% 26% 14% 12% 10% 14% 8% 13% 13% 10% 14%COLD AND FLU VACCINATIONS 39 11 13 11 7 7 20 21 8 3 11 21 7 17 4 15 17 5 13 10% 6% 9% 9% 6% 3% 10% 10% 6% 2% 7% 11% 14% 9% 7% 10% 11% 6% 8%ALCOHOL AND SUBSTANCE ABUSE 28 17 13 11 7 12 14 5 6 2 10 13 4 8 9 9 7 9 11 7% 9% 9% 9% 6% 6% 7% 2% 5% 1% 7% 7% 8% 4% 15% 6% 5% 11% 7% P U B L I C O P I N I O N S T R A T E G I E S
    • WORKPLACE WELLNESS INITIATIVES STUDY / 12430 / SEPTEMBER 2012 PAGE 42Table 14-3QUESTION 8C:Which from the list below do you consider to be the top three health conditions or areas that you feel are the greatest concern to your employees? Rank them in terms of yourfirst, second and third choice.Combined Choice.BANNER 3 ------------------- AMONG THOSE WITH WELLNESS INITIATIVE --------------------- HAVE WELLNESS % OF YEARS FINANCIAL EMPLOYEE ACCESS INITATIVE OPERATING BUDGET IN OPERATION INCENTIVE ROI TO INITIATIVE =========== ================= ================= =========== =========== ================== 6% OR 1-2 3-4 5+ TOTAL YES NO 0-1% 2-5% MORE YRS YRS YRS YES NO YES NO 0-74% 75-84% 85%+ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ -----BASE=TOTAL ASKED 405 223 182 78 64 26 72 43 90 111 110 90 124 19 13 172 100% 55% 45% 35% 29% 12% 32% 19% 40% 50% 49% 40% 56% 9% 6% 77%OBESITY/OVERWEIGHT 211 129 82 49 37 16 41 32 49 70 58 56 66 9 8 105 52% 58% 45% 63% 58% 62% 57% 74% 54% 63% 53% 62% 53% 47% 62% 61%STRESS AND OTHER MENTAL 207 119 88 38 32 13 37 19 48 56 62 48 65 11 5 88HEALTH ISSUES 51% 53% 48% 49% 50% 50% 51% 44% 53% 50% 56% 53% 52% 58% 38% 51%LACK OF EXERCISE/FITNESS 205 113 92 38 38 10 37 22 45 54 58 44 63 10 6 90 51% 51% 51% 49% 59% 38% 51% 51% 50% 49% 53% 49% 51% 53% 46% 52%HIGH BLOOD PRESSURE 136 80 56 29 20 10 24 17 33 48 31 33 46 6 6 62 34% 36% 31% 37% 31% 38% 33% 40% 37% 43% 28% 37% 37% 32% 46% 36%CHRONIC DISEASES 133 69 64 26 23 5 22 13 30 36 33 27 40 8 4 49 33% 31% 35% 33% 36% 19% 31% 30% 33% 32% 30% 30% 32% 42% 31% 28%TOBACCO USE 74 42 32 18 11 6 13 7 21 20 22 13 29 4 1 35 18% 19% 18% 23% 17% 23% 18% 16% 23% 18% 20% 14% 23% 21% 8% 20%POOR NUTRITION 69 26 43 9 9 2 15 2 7 8 18 9 17 1 5 20 17% 12% 24% 12% 14% 8% 21% 5% 8% 7% 16% 10% 14% 5% 38% 12%WORKPLACE INJURIES 57 29 28 7 7 3 9 5 12 11 18 13 15 3 - 21 14% 13% 15% 9% 11% 12% 13% 12% 13% 10% 16% 14% 12% 16% - 12%HIGH CHOLESTEROL 52 28 24 10 7 6 9 4 13 19 9 15 12 3 2 19 13% 13% 13% 13% 11% 23% 13% 9% 14% 17% 8% 17% 10% 16% 15% 11%COLD AND FLU VACCINATIONS 39 15 24 5 3 3 3 4 5 4 10 3 10 - - 13 10% 7% 13% 6% 5% 12% 4% 9% 6% 4% 9% 3% 8% - - 8%ALCOHOL AND SUBSTANCE ABUSE 28 19 9 5 5 4 6 4 7 7 11 9 9 2 2 14 7% 9% 5% 6% 8% 15% 8% 9% 8% 6% 10% 10% 7% 11% 15% 8% P U B L I C O P I N I O N S T R A T E G I E S
    • WORKPLACE WELLNESS INITIATIVES STUDY / 12430 / SEPTEMBER 2012 PAGE 43Table 15-1QUESTION 10:In general, how beneficial would you say worksite wellness initiatives are to organizations like yours?BANNER 1 ORG HEALTH ORGANIZATION SIZE PROFIT STATUS REGION EMPLOYEES W/ CARE YEARS IN OPERATION GRADE ================= ================= ======================= ================== ======================= =========== NON- 100- PRIV- PUB- PROF/ NORTH MID- 0-10 11-20 21-50 51+ TOTAL 1-99 499 500+ ATE LIC GOVT -EAST SOUTH WEST WEST 0-74% 75-84% 85%+ YRS YRS YRS YRS A/B C/D/F ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----BASE=TOTAL ASKED 404 112 123 169 210 77 117 61 129 139 75 108 78 168 44 61 144 135 234 167 100% 28% 30% 42% 52% 19% 29% 15% 32% 34% 19% 27% 19% 42% 11% 15% 36% 33% 58% 41%**D/S (BENEFICIAL - NOT 302 66 93 143 138 65 99 39 83 121 59 88 56 126 30 33 108 117 172 127 BENEFICIAL) 75% 59% 76% 85% 66% 84% 85% 64% 64% 87% 79% 81% 72% 75% 68% 54% 75% 87% 74% 76%TOTAL BENEFICIAL 353 89 108 156 174 71 108 50 106 130 67 98 67 147 37 47 126 126 203 147---------------- 87% 79% 88% 92% 83% 92% 92% 82% 82% 94% 89% 91% 86% 88% 84% 77% 88% 93% 87% 88%TOTAL NOT BENEFICIAL 51 23 15 13 36 6 9 11 23 9 8 10 11 21 7 14 18 9 31 20-------------------- 13% 21% 12% 8% 17% 8% 8% 18% 18% 6% 11% 9% 14% 13% 16% 23% 13% 7% 13% 12% VERY BENEFICIAL 154 29 48 77 77 27 50 21 45 52 36 40 25 68 16 19 54 56 89 63 38% 26% 39% 46% 37% 35% 43% 34% 35% 37% 48% 37% 32% 40% 36% 31% 38% 41% 38% 38% SOMEWHAT BENEFICIAL 199 60 60 79 97 44 58 29 61 78 31 58 42 79 21 28 72 70 114 84 49% 54% 49% 47% 46% 57% 50% 48% 47% 56% 41% 54% 54% 47% 48% 46% 50% 52% 49% 50% NOT THAT BENEFICIAL 48 21 14 13 36 5 7 10 22 9 7 9 11 19 7 14 17 7 30 18 12% 19% 11% 8% 17% 6% 6% 16% 17% 6% 9% 8% 14% 11% 16% 23% 12% 5% 13% 11% NOT BENEFICIAL AT ALL 3 2 1 - - 1 2 1 1 - 1 1 - 2 - - 1 2 1 2 1% 2% 1% - - 1% 2% 2% 1% - 1% 1% - 1% - - 1% 1% - 1% P U B L I C O P I N I O N S T R A T E G I E S
    • WORKPLACE WELLNESS INITIATIVES STUDY / 12430 / SEPTEMBER 2012 PAGE 44Table 15-2QUESTION 10:In general, how beneficial would you say worksite wellness initiatives are to organizations like yours?BANNER 2 WELLNESS ROLE OF IMPORTANT ISSUES (%10) HEALTH CONCERNS (COMBINED) - BENEFICIAL STATE/LOCAL GOVT ROLE OF FED GOVT ======================== =============================== ================= ================= ================= DECR LACK HIGH NOT INSU- PROD- WORK- OBES- STRESS OF CHRON BLOOD VERY/ MORE LESS NO MORE LESS NO RANCE UCTI- ABSEN- ERS ITY/ /MEN- FIT- DIS- PRE- AT ACT- ACT- CHAN- ACT- ACT- CHAN- TOTAL COSTS VITY TEEISM COMP WEIGHT TAL NESS EASE SSURE VERY SMWT ALL IVE IVE GE IVE IVE GE ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ------ ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----BASE=TOTAL ASKED 404 196 140 119 110 210 207 204 133 136 154 199 51 184 60 146 151 78 157 100% 49% 35% 29% 27% 52% 51% 50% 33% 34% 38% 49% 13% 46% 15% 36% 37% 19% 39%**D/S (BENEFICIAL - NOT 302 166 122 99 92 172 157 154 95 102 154 199 -51 158 36 100 129 52 109 BENEFICIAL) 75% 85% 87% 83% 84% 82% 76% 75% 71% 75% 100% 100% -100% 86% 60% 68% 85% 67% 69%TOTAL BENEFICIAL 353 181 131 109 101 191 182 179 114 119 154 199 - 171 48 123 140 65 133---------------- 87% 92% 94% 92% 92% 91% 88% 88% 86% 88% 100% 100% - 93% 80% 84% 93% 83% 85%TOTAL NOT BENEFICIAL 51 15 9 10 9 19 25 25 19 17 - - 51 13 12 23 11 13 24-------------------- 13% 8% 6% 8% 8% 9% 12% 12% 14% 13% - - 100% 7% 20% 16% 7% 17% 15% VERY BENEFICIAL 154 93 70 59 54 90 82 90 39 47 154 - - 76 16 53 72 18 56 38% 47% 50% 50% 49% 43% 40% 44% 29% 35% 100% - - 41% 27% 36% 48% 23% 36% SOMEWHAT BENEFICIAL 199 88 61 50 47 101 100 89 75 72 - 199 - 95 32 70 68 47 77 49% 45% 44% 42% 43% 48% 48% 44% 56% 53% - 100% - 52% 53% 48% 45% 60% 49% NOT THAT BENEFICIAL 48 13 9 10 9 17 24 24 18 17 - - 48 13 9 23 11 10 24 12% 7% 6% 8% 8% 8% 12% 12% 14% 13% - - 94% 7% 15% 16% 7% 13% 15% NOT BENEFICIAL AT ALL 3 2 - - - 2 1 1 1 - - - 3 - 3 - - 3 - 1% 1% - - - 1% - - 1% - - - 6% - 5% - - 4% - P U B L I C O P I N I O N S T R A T E G I E S
    • WORKPLACE WELLNESS INITIATIVES STUDY / 12430 / SEPTEMBER 2012 PAGE 45Table 15-3QUESTION 10:In general, how beneficial would you say worksite wellness initiatives are to organizations like yours?BANNER 3 ------------------- AMONG THOSE WITH WELLNESS INITIATIVE --------------------- HAVE WELLNESS % OF YEARS FINANCIAL EMPLOYEE ACCESS INITATIVE OPERATING BUDGET IN OPERATION INCENTIVE ROI TO INITIATIVE =========== ================= ================= =========== =========== ================== 6% OR 1-2 3-4 5+ TOTAL YES NO 0-1% 2-5% MORE YRS YRS YRS YES NO YES NO 0-74% 75-84% 85%+ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ -----BASE=TOTAL ASKED 404 223 181 78 64 25 72 43 90 111 109 90 123 19 12 172 100% 55% 45% 35% 29% 11% 32% 19% 40% 50% 49% 40% 55% 9% 5% 77%**D/S (BENEFICIAL - NOT 302 189 113 66 50 21 64 31 78 103 85 82 99 11 12 150 BENEFICIAL) 75% 85% 62% 85% 78% 84% 89% 72% 87% 93% 78% 91% 80% 58% 100% 87%TOTAL BENEFICIAL 353 206 147 72 57 23 68 37 84 107 97 86 111 15 12 161---------------- 87% 92% 81% 92% 89% 92% 94% 86% 93% 96% 89% 96% 90% 79% 100% 94%TOTAL NOT BENEFICIAL 51 17 34 6 7 2 4 6 6 4 12 4 12 4 - 11-------------------- 13% 8% 19% 8% 11% 8% 6% 14% 7% 4% 11% 4% 10% 21% - 6% VERY BENEFICIAL 154 112 42 34 32 15 45 15 41 57 53 51 56 8 5 87 38% 50% 23% 44% 50% 60% 63% 35% 46% 51% 49% 57% 46% 42% 42% 51% SOMEWHAT BENEFICIAL 199 94 105 38 25 8 23 22 43 50 44 35 55 7 7 74 49% 42% 58% 49% 39% 32% 32% 51% 48% 45% 40% 39% 45% 37% 58% 43% NOT THAT BENEFICIAL 48 17 31 6 7 2 4 6 6 4 12 4 12 4 - 11 12% 8% 17% 8% 11% 8% 6% 14% 7% 4% 11% 4% 10% 21% - 6% NOT BENEFICIAL AT ALL 3 - 3 - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1% - 2% - - - - - - - - - - - - - P U B L I C O P I N I O N S T R A T E G I E S
    • WORKPLACE WELLNESS INITIATIVES STUDY / 12430 / SEPTEMBER 2012 PAGE 46Table 16-1Summary of Worksite Wellness Initiative Statements: % Strongly AgreeBANNER 1 ORG HEALTH ORGANIZATION SIZE PROFIT STATUS REGION EMPLOYEES W/ CARE YEARS IN OPERATION GRADE ================= ================= ======================= ================== ======================= =========== NON- 100- PRIV- PUB- PROF/ NORTH MID- 0-10 11-20 21-50 51+ TOTAL 1-99 499 500+ ATE LIC GOVT -EAST SOUTH WEST WEST 0-74% 75-84% 85%+ YRS YRS YRS YRS A/B C/D/F ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----BASE=TOTAL ASKED 406 113 124 169 212 77 117 61 129 140 76 108 79 169 46 61 144 135 234 169 100% 28% 31% 42% 52% 19% 29% 15% 32% 34% 19% 27% 19% 42% 11% 15% 35% 33% 58% 42%WORKSITE WELLNESS 158 36 48 74 77 30 51 26 48 59 25 45 25 68 20 21 53 56 93 64 INITIATIVES HELP WORKERS 40% 32% 40% 44% 37% 39% 45% 45% 38% 42% 33% 42% 32% 40% 43% 35% 38% 42% 40% 39% DEVELOP HEALTHIER (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) LIFESTYLES.WORKSITE WELLNESS 125 27 41 57 63 23 39 22 31 48 24 36 24 56 15 19 42 45 75 49 INITIATIVES LOWER HEALTH 31% 24% 33% 34% 30% 30% 34% 36% 24% 35% 32% 33% 31% 34% 33% 31% 30% 33% 32% 29% CARE COSTS. (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2)WORKSITE WELLNESS 91 22 25 44 45 19 27 18 25 27 21 25 11 44 12 7 37 29 56 34 INITIATIVES INCREASE 23% 20% 20% 27% 21% 25% 23% 30% 20% 19% 28% 23% 14% 26% 26% 12% 26% 22% 24% 21% WORKER PRODUCTIVITY. (3) (3) (4) (3) (3) (3) (3) (4) (3) (3) (3) (3) (4) (3) (4) (4) (3) (3) (3) (4)WORKSITE WELLNESS 74 14 22 38 39 14 21 18 18 23 15 22 10 34 12 7 26 24 43 30 INITIATIVES REDUCE WORKER 19% 13% 18% 23% 19% 19% 18% 30% 15% 17% 20% 21% 13% 21% 27% 11% 19% 18% 19% 18% ABSENTEEISM. (4) (5) (5) (4) (4) (4) (5) (3) (5) (4) (4) (4) (5) (4) (3) (5) (4) (5) (4) (5)WORKSITE WELLNESS 70 17 27 26 35 10 25 16 21 20 13 22 14 26 5 8 26 28 32 38 INITIATIVES ONLY IMPACT A 17% 15% 22% 15% 17% 13% 22% 26% 17% 14% 17% 20% 18% 15% 11% 13% 18% 21% 14% 23% LIMITED NUMBER OF (5) (4) (3) (5) (5) (5) (4) (5) (4) (5) (5) (5) (3) (5) (5) (3) (5) (4) (5) (3) WORKERS.WORKSITE WELLNESS 28 7 8 13 18 4 6 2 9 12 5 7 8 8 3 3 8 10 13 15 INITIATIVES MAKE 7% 6% 7% 8% 9% 5% 5% 3% 7% 9% 7% 7% 10% 5% 7% 5% 6% 7% 6% 9% EMPLOYEES FEEL THAT THEIR (6) (6) (6) (6) (6) (6) (6) (7) (6) (6) (6) (6) (6) (6) *(6) (7) (6) (6) (6) (6) PRIVACY IS BEING INTRUDED UPON.WORKSITE WELLNESS 19 5 8 6 11 3 5 3 7 5 4 3 5 7 3 4 6 5 11 8 INITIATIVES DO LITTLE TO 5% 4% 7% 4% 5% 4% 4% 5% 6% 4% 5% 3% 6% 4% 7% 7% 4% 4% 5% 5% IMPROVE OVERALL WORKER (7) (7) (7) (7) (7) (7) (7) (6) (7) (7) (7) (7) (7) (7) *(6) (6) (7) (7) (7) (7) HEALTH. P U B L I C O P I N I O N S T R A T E G I E S
    • WORKPLACE WELLNESS INITIATIVES STUDY / 12430 / SEPTEMBER 2012 PAGE 47Table 16-2Summary of Worksite Wellness Initiative Statements: % Strongly AgreeBANNER 2 WELLNESS ROLE OF IMPORTANT ISSUES (%10) HEALTH CONCERNS (COMBINED) - BENEFICIAL STATE/LOCAL GOVT ROLE OF FED GOVT ======================== =============================== ================= ================= ================= DECR LACK HIGH NOT INSU- PROD- WORK- OBES- STRESS OF CHRON BLOOD VERY/ MORE LESS NO MORE LESS NO RANCE UCTI- ABSEN- ERS ITY/ /MEN- FIT- DIS- PRE- AT ACT- ACT- CHAN- ACT- ACT- CHAN- TOTAL COSTS VITY TEEISM COMP WEIGHT TAL NESS EASE SSURE VERY SMWT ALL IVE IVE GE IVE IVE GE ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ------ ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----BASE=TOTAL ASKED 406 197 140 120 110 211 207 205 133 136 154 199 51 184 60 148 152 79 157 100% 49% 34% 30% 27% 52% 51% 50% 33% 33% 38% 49% 13% 45% 15% 36% 37% 19% 39%WORKSITE WELLNESS 158 92 66 56 54 83 88 93 44 50 95 55 8 85 13 55 70 20 61 INITIATIVES HELP WORKERS 40% 47% 47% 47% 49% 40% 43% 46% 34% 37% 63% 28% 16% 47% 22% 37% 46% 26% 39% DEVELOP HEALTHIER (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (2) (1) (2) (1) (1) (1) (1) LIFESTYLES.WORKSITE WELLNESS 125 72 53 48 48 72 63 68 35 42 76 45 3 73 14 35 59 19 43 INITIATIVES LOWER HEALTH 31% 37% 38% 40% 44% 35% 31% 33% 27% 31% 50% 23% 6% 40% 23% 24% 39% 24% 28% CARE COSTS. (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (6) (2) (1) (2) (2) (2) (2)WORKSITE WELLNESS 91 61 43 35 38 46 51 50 27 29 63 25 2 49 11 27 46 15 26 INITIATIVES INCREASE 23% 32% 31% 30% 35% 22% 25% 25% 21% 22% 42% 13% 4% 27% 18% 18% 30% 19% 17% WORKER PRODUCTIVITY. (3) (3) (3) (3) (3) (3) (3) (3) (3) (3) (3) (4) (7) (3) (4) (3) (3) (4) (3)WORKSITE WELLNESS 74 46 34 33 35 40 44 39 20 23 52 19 3 43 7 20 39 8 23 INITIATIVES REDUCE WORKER 19% 24% 25% 28% 32% 20% 22% 20% 15% 17% 35% 10% 6% 24% 12% 14% 26% 11% 15% ABSENTEEISM. (4) (4) (4) (4) (4) (4) (4) (4) (5) (5) (4) (5) (5) (4) (5) (5) (4) (5) (5)WORKSITE WELLNESS 70 33 25 20 15 39 33 30 24 25 17 38 14 28 12 25 23 18 26 INITIATIVES ONLY IMPACT A 17% 17% 18% 17% 14% 19% 16% 15% 18% 19% 11% 19% 28% 15% 20% 17% 15% 23% 17% LIMITED NUMBER OF (5) (5) (5) (5) (5) (5) (5) (5) (4) (4) (5) (3) (1) (5) (3) (4) (5) (3) (4) WORKERS.WORKSITE WELLNESS 28 15 17 12 13 10 13 13 13 8 9 14 5 10 6 10 10 5 11 INITIATIVES MAKE 7% 8% 12% 10% 12% 5% 6% 6% 10% 6% 6% 7% 10% 5% 10% 7% 7% 6% 7% EMPLOYEES FEEL THAT THEIR (6) (6) (6) (6) (6) (7) (6) (6) (6) (6) (6) (6) (4) (6) (6) (6) (6) (6) (6) PRIVACY IS BEING INTRUDED UPON.WORKSITE WELLNESS 19 5 6 5 5 11 8 9 7 6 6 5 8 9 3 6 5 4 9 INITIATIVES DO LITTLE TO 5% 3% 4% 4% 5% 5% 4% 4% 5% 4% 4% 3% 16% 5% 5% 4% 3% 5% 6% IMPROVE OVERALL WORKER (7) (7) (7) (7) (7) (6) (7) (7) (7) (7) (7) (7) (3) (7) (7) (7) (7) (7) (7) HEALTH. P U B L I C O P I N I O N S T R A T E G I E S
    • WORKPLACE WELLNESS INITIATIVES STUDY / 12430 / SEPTEMBER 2012 PAGE 48Table 16-3Summary of Worksite Wellness Initiative Statements: % Strongly AgreeBANNER 3 ------------------- AMONG THOSE WITH WELLNESS INITIATIVE --------------------- HAVE WELLNESS % OF YEARS FINANCIAL EMPLOYEE ACCESS INITATIVE OPERATING BUDGET IN OPERATION INCENTIVE ROI TO INITIATIVE =========== ================= ================= =========== =========== ================== 6% OR 1-2 3-4 5+ TOTAL YES NO 0-1% 2-5% MORE YRS YRS YRS YES NO YES NO 0-74% 75-84% 85%+ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ -----BASE=TOTAL ASKED 406 224 182 78 64 26 73 43 90 111 110 90 124 19 13 172 100% 55% 45% 35% 29% 12% 33% 19% 40% 50% 49% 40% 55% 8% 6% 77%WORKSITE WELLNESS 158 97 61 30 31 10 39 13 36 49 47 47 43 7 4 75 INITIATIVES HELP WORKERS 40% 44% 34% 39% 49% 40% 55% 31% 40% 45% 44% 53% 35% 39% 31% 44% DEVELOP HEALTHIER (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (3) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) *(1) (1) LIFESTYLES.WORKSITE WELLNESS 125 77 48 25 21 10 27 13 31 43 33 40 32 4 3 64 INITIATIVES LOWER HEALTH 31% 35% 27% 32% 33% 42% 37% 30% 35% 39% 30% 44% 26% 21% 23% 38% CARE COSTS. (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) *(4) (4) (2)WORKSITE WELLNESS 91 60 31 14 16 11 25 6 24 27 32 31 24 6 2 44 INITIATIVES INCREASE 23% 27% 17% 18% 25% 46% 35% 14% 27% 25% 29% 35% 20% 32% 15% 26% WORKER PRODUCTIVITY. (3) (3) (3) (4) (3) (1) (3) (5) (3) (4) (3) (3) (4) (3) (5) (3)WORKSITE WELLNESS 74 49 25 13 12 7 20 7 17 27 21 25 21 4 4 35 INITIATIVES REDUCE WORKER 19% 22% 14% 17% 19% 29% 28% 18% 19% 25% 19% 28% 17% 21% 31% 21% ABSENTEEISM. (4) (4) (5) (5) (5) (4) (4) (4) (4) (3) (5) (4) (5) *(4) *(1) (4)WORKSITE WELLNESS 70 43 27 18 14 2 17 10 13 20 22 13 28 7 4 28 INITIATIVES ONLY IMPACT A 17% 19% 15% 23% 22% 8% 23% 23% 15% 18% 20% 14% 23% 37% 31% 16% LIMITED NUMBER OF (5) (5) (4) (3) (4) (6) (5) (3) (5) (5) (4) (5) (3) (2) *(1) (5) WORKERS.WORKSITE WELLNESS 28 15 13 3 4 3 7 3 4 8 6 7 7 1 - 11 INITIATIVES MAKE 7% 7% 7% 4% 6% 12% 10% 7% 4% 7% 5% 8% 6% 5% - 6% EMPLOYEES FEEL THAT THEIR (6) (6) (6) (7) (6) (5) (6) (6) (7) (6) (7) (6) (7) (7) (6) PRIVACY IS BEING INTRUDED UPON.WORKSITE WELLNESS 19 11 8 4 3 1 5 2 4 3 7 3 7 1 1 7 INITIATIVES DO LITTLE TO 5% 5% 4% 5% 5% 4% 7% 5% 5% 3% 6% 3% 6% 6% 8% 4% IMPROVE OVERALL WORKER (7) (7) (7) (6) (7) (7) (7) (7) (6) (7) (6) (7) (6) (6) (6) (7) HEALTH. P U B L I C O P I N I O N S T R A T E G I E S
    • WORKPLACE WELLNESS INITIATIVES STUDY / 12430 / SEPTEMBER 2012 PAGE 49Table 17-1Summary of Worksite Wellness Initiative Statements: % Total AgreeBANNER 1 ORG HEALTH ORGANIZATION SIZE PROFIT STATUS REGION EMPLOYEES W/ CARE YEARS IN OPERATION GRADE ================= ================= ======================= ================== ======================= =========== NON- 100- PRIV- PUB- PROF/ NORTH MID- 0-10 11-20 21-50 51+ TOTAL 1-99 499 500+ ATE LIC GOVT -EAST SOUTH WEST WEST 0-74% 75-84% 85%+ YRS YRS YRS YRS A/B C/D/F ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----BASE=TOTAL ASKED 406 113 124 169 212 77 117 61 129 140 76 108 79 169 46 61 144 135 234 169 100% 28% 31% 42% 52% 19% 29% 15% 32% 34% 19% 27% 19% 42% 11% 15% 35% 33% 58% 42%WORKSITE WELLNESS 380 105 115 160 198 72 110 56 121 134 69 102 72 162 44 56 132 130 226 152 INITIATIVES HELP WORKERS 95% 94% 96% 95% 94% 95% 96% 97% 96% 96% 91% 95% 94% 96% 96% 93% 94% 97% 97% 93% DEVELOP HEALTHIER (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) LIFESTYLES.WORKSITE WELLNESS 337 89 106 142 175 64 98 52 103 118 64 100 66 136 39 52 117 116 197 138 INITIATIVES LOWER HEALTH 84% 80% 86% 85% 84% 84% 84% 85% 81% 85% 86% 93% 85% 82% 85% 85% 84% 86% 85% 83% CARE COSTS. (2) (3) (2) (2) (3) (2) (2) (2) (2) (3) (3) (2) (2) (3) (4) (2) (2) (3) (2) (2)WORKSITE WELLNESS 334 92 104 138 176 63 95 49 99 119 67 92 64 142 41 47 116 116 196 136 INITIATIVES INCREASE 84% 82% 85% 83% 84% 84% 83% 80% 80% 86% 88% 85% 83% 85% 89% 78% 83% 87% 84% 82% WORKER PRODUCTIVITY. (3) (2) (3) (3) (2) (3) (3) (3) (3) (2) (2) (3) (3) (2) (3) (3) (3) (2) (3) (3)WORKSITE WELLNESS 309 85 95 129 161 58 90 47 97 110 55 90 58 121 40 44 99 111 184 123 INITIATIVES REDUCE WORKER 78% 77% 79% 78% 78% 77% 79% 78% 78% 80% 74% 84% 76% 74% 91% 72% 71% 83% 80% 75% ABSENTEEISM. (4) (4) (4) (4) (4) (4) (4) (4) (4) (4) (4) (4) (4) (4) (2) (5) (4) (4) (4) (4)WORKSITE WELLNESS 260 73 89 98 139 47 74 43 89 86 42 67 51 110 27 47 92 83 145 115 INITIATIVES ONLY IMPACT A 65% 65% 72% 58% 66% 61% 64% 70% 70% 61% 56% 62% 65% 65% 59% 77% 65% 61% 62% 68% LIMITED NUMBER OF (5) (5) (5) (5) (5) (5) (5) (5) (5) (5) (5) (5) (5) (5) (5) (4) (5) (5) (5) (5) WORKERS.WORKSITE WELLNESS 203 58 59 86 112 40 51 28 66 77 32 58 40 83 18 32 74 68 108 94 INITIATIVES MAKE 51% 52% 49% 51% 54% 52% 44% 47% 52% 55% 43% 54% 52% 50% 39% 52% 52% 51% 47% 56% EMPLOYEES FEEL THAT THEIR (6) (6) (6) (6) (6) (6) (6) (6) (6) (6) (6) (6) (6) (6) (6) (6) (6) (6) (6) (6) PRIVACY IS BEING INTRUDED UPON.WORKSITE WELLNESS 105 33 36 36 60 19 26 21 28 30 26 31 18 37 15 17 37 30 61 44 INITIATIVES DO LITTLE TO 26% 29% 30% 22% 29% 25% 22% 36% 22% 21% 34% 29% 23% 22% 33% 28% 26% 22% 26% 26% IMPROVE OVERALL WORKER (7) (7) (7) (7) (7) (7) (7) (7) (7) (7) (7) (7) (7) (7) (7) (7) (7) (7) (7) (7) HEALTH. P U B L I C O P I N I O N S T R A T E G I E S
    • WORKPLACE WELLNESS INITIATIVES STUDY / 12430 / SEPTEMBER 2012 PAGE 50Table 17-2Summary of Worksite Wellness Initiative Statements: % Total AgreeBANNER 2 WELLNESS ROLE OF IMPORTANT ISSUES (%10) HEALTH CONCERNS (COMBINED) - BENEFICIAL STATE/LOCAL GOVT ROLE OF FED GOVT ======================== =============================== ================= ================= ================= DECR LACK HIGH NOT INSU- PROD- WORK- OBES- STRESS OF CHRON BLOOD VERY/ MORE LESS NO MORE LESS NO RANCE UCTI- ABSEN- ERS ITY/ /MEN- FIT- DIS- PRE- AT ACT- ACT- CHAN- ACT- ACT- CHAN- TOTAL COSTS VITY TEEISM COMP WEIGHT TAL NESS EASE SSURE VERY SMWT ALL IVE IVE GE IVE IVE GE ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ------ ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----BASE=TOTAL ASKED 406 197 140 120 110 211 207 205 133 136 154 199 51 184 60 148 152 79 157 100% 49% 34% 30% 27% 52% 51% 50% 33% 33% 38% 49% 13% 45% 15% 36% 37% 19% 39%WORKSITE WELLNESS 380 186 136 117 107 195 199 192 122 127 149 188 42 174 54 141 147 71 147 INITIATIVES HELP WORKERS 95% 96% 98% 98% 97% 95% 97% 95% 93% 95% 99% 95% 86% 96% 93% 95% 97% 92% 95% DEVELOP HEALTHIER (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) LIFESTYLES.WORKSITE WELLNESS 337 167 119 103 96 177 172 177 107 113 142 165 29 166 44 118 140 61 124 INITIATIVES LOWER HEALTH 84% 86% 85% 86% 87% 85% 84% 87% 81% 84% 93% 84% 58% 91% 73% 80% 93% 77% 79% CARE COSTS. (2) (3) (3) (3) (3) (3) (2) (2) (3) (2) (3) (2) (3) (2) *(2) (3) (2) (2) (4)WORKSITE WELLNESS 334 171 123 108 96 180 165 175 106 110 145 160 28 161 43 119 133 60 127 INITIATIVES INCREASE 84% 89% 89% 92% 88% 87% 80% 86% 82% 82% 96% 82% 55% 88% 72% 82% 88% 76% 82% WORKER PRODUCTIVITY. (3) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (3) (3) (2) (3) (2) (3) (7) (3) (4) (2) (3) (3) (2)WORKSITE WELLNESS 309 155 111 94 90 160 159 158 98 104 135 147 27 142 41 117 120 53 125 INITIATIVES REDUCE WORKER 78% 81% 81% 80% 83% 78% 78% 80% 75% 78% 91% 75% 55% 79% 69% 80% 81% 70% 80% ABSENTEEISM. (4) (4) (4) (4) (4) (4) (4) (4) (4) (4) (4) (4) (6) (4) (5) (4) (4) (5) (3)WORKSITE WELLNESS 260 124 90 77 71 139 126 130 87 91 78 140 41 111 44 98 90 58 103 INITIATIVES ONLY IMPACT A 65% 63% 64% 64% 65% 67% 61% 64% 66% 67% 51% 71% 82% 60% 73% 66% 59% 73% 66% LIMITED NUMBER OF (5) (5) (5) (5) (5) (5) (5) (5) (5) (5) (5) (5) (2) (5) *(2) (5) (5) (4) (5) WORKERS.WORKSITE WELLNESS 203 102 68 56 54 98 101 96 74 77 64 111 28 93 35 71 76 42 81 INITIATIVES MAKE 51% 53% 49% 47% 50% 47% 49% 47% 56% 57% 42% 56% 57% 51% 59% 48% 50% 54% 52% EMPLOYEES FEEL THAT THEIR (6) (6) (6) (6) (6) (6) (6) (6) (6) (6) (6) (6) (4) (6) (6) (6) (6) (6) (6) PRIVACY IS BEING INTRUDED UPON.WORKSITE WELLNESS 105 44 29 25 27 45 49 46 44 37 20 56 29 39 23 37 30 28 39 INITIATIVES DO LITTLE TO 26% 23% 21% 21% 25% 22% 24% 23% 34% 27% 13% 29% 57% 21% 38% 25% 20% 35% 25% IMPROVE OVERALL WORKER (7) (7) (7) (7) (7) (7) (7) (7) (7) (7) (7) (7) (5) (7) (7) (7) (7) (7) (7) HEALTH. P U B L I C O P I N I O N S T R A T E G I E S
    • WORKPLACE WELLNESS INITIATIVES STUDY / 12430 / SEPTEMBER 2012 PAGE 51Table 17-3Summary of Worksite Wellness Initiative Statements: % Total AgreeBANNER 3 ------------------- AMONG THOSE WITH WELLNESS INITIATIVE --------------------- HAVE WELLNESS % OF YEARS FINANCIAL EMPLOYEE ACCESS INITATIVE OPERATING BUDGET IN OPERATION INCENTIVE ROI TO INITIATIVE =========== ================= ================= =========== =========== ================== 6% OR 1-2 3-4 5+ TOTAL YES NO 0-1% 2-5% MORE YRS YRS YRS YES NO YES NO 0-74% 75-84% 85%+ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ -----BASE=TOTAL ASKED 406 224 182 78 64 26 73 43 90 111 110 90 124 19 13 172 100% 55% 45% 35% 29% 12% 33% 19% 40% 50% 49% 40% 55% 8% 6% 77%WORKSITE WELLNESS 380 210 170 75 60 22 69 40 84 105 103 85 117 17 11 163 INITIATIVES HELP WORKERS 95% 95% 94% 97% 95% 88% 97% 95% 94% 95% 95% 96% 96% 94% 85% 96% DEVELOP HEALTHIER (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) *(1) (1) LIFESTYLES.WORKSITE WELLNESS 337 188 149 64 57 20 64 30 80 98 89 82 99 15 11 148 INITIATIVES LOWER HEALTH 84% 85% 83% 82% 89% 83% 88% 70% 91% 88% 82% 91% 80% 79% 85% 87% CARE COSTS. (2) (2) (3) (2) (3) (3) (3) (3) (2) (2) (3) (2) (3) (4) *(1) (2)WORKSITE WELLNESS 334 185 149 61 58 19 64 29 78 92 91 77 100 16 8 144 INITIATIVES INCREASE 84% 84% 83% 79% 91% 79% 89% 69% 88% 84% 83% 87% 81% 84% 62% 85% WORKER PRODUCTIVITY. (3) (3) (2) (3) (2) (4) (2) (4) (3) (3) (2) (3) (2) (3) (5) (3)WORKSITE WELLNESS 309 172 137 56 50 21 58 27 73 89 82 72 92 17 9 130 INITIATIVES REDUCE WORKER 78% 79% 77% 74% 79% 88% 81% 68% 82% 83% 75% 82% 75% 89% 69% 78% ABSENTEEISM. (4) (4) (4) (4) (4) (2) (4) (5) (4) (4) (4) (4) (4) (2) (4) (4)WORKSITE WELLNESS 260 137 123 54 40 11 46 31 52 69 67 52 79 12 10 103 INITIATIVES ONLY IMPACT A 65% 62% 68% 69% 63% 44% 63% 72% 58% 62% 61% 58% 64% 63% 77% 60% LIMITED NUMBER OF (5) (5) (5) (5) (5) (6) (5) (2) (5) (5) (5) (5) (5) (5) (3) (5) WORKERS.WORKSITE WELLNESS 203 110 93 40 28 14 37 23 42 66 43 41 64 10 7 83 INITIATIVES MAKE 51% 50% 52% 51% 44% 56% 51% 53% 47% 59% 39% 46% 52% 53% 54% 49% EMPLOYEES FEEL THAT THEIR (6) (6) (6) (6) (6) (5) (6) (6) (6) (6) (6) (6) (6) (6) (6) (6) PRIVACY IS BEING INTRUDED UPON.WORKSITE WELLNESS 105 51 54 19 15 4 17 13 18 27 23 17 32 3 4 38 INITIATIVES DO LITTLE TO 26% 23% 30% 25% 24% 16% 24% 30% 20% 24% 21% 19% 26% 18% 31% 22% IMPROVE OVERALL WORKER (7) (7) (7) (7) (7) (7) (7) (7) (7) (7) (7) (7) (7) (7) (7) (7) HEALTH. P U B L I C O P I N I O N S T R A T E G I E S
    • WORKPLACE WELLNESS INITIATIVES STUDY / 12430 / SEPTEMBER 2012 PAGE 52Table 18-1QUESTION 11:Below are a series of different viewpoints on worksite wellness initiatives. For each one, please select if you AGREE or DISAGREE with a particular position.Worksite wellness initiatives help workers develop healthier lifestyles.BANNER 1 ORG HEALTH ORGANIZATION SIZE PROFIT STATUS REGION EMPLOYEES W/ CARE YEARS IN OPERATION GRADE ================= ================= ======================= ================== ======================= =========== NON- 100- PRIV- PUB- PROF/ NORTH MID- 0-10 11-20 21-50 51+ TOTAL 1-99 499 500+ ATE LIC GOVT -EAST SOUTH WEST WEST 0-74% 75-84% 85%+ YRS YRS YRS YRS A/B C/D/F ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----BASE=TOTAL ASKED 400 112 120 168 210 76 114 58 126 140 76 107 77 168 46 60 140 134 234 164 100% 28% 30% 42% 53% 19% 29% 15% 32% 35% 19% 27% 19% 42% 12% 15% 35% 34% 59% 41%**D/S (AGREE - DISAGREE) 360 98 110 152 186 68 106 54 116 128 62 97 67 156 42 52 124 126 218 140 90% 88% 92% 90% 89% 89% 93% 93% 92% 91% 82% 91% 87% 93% 91% 87% 89% 94% 93% 85%TOTAL AGREE 380 105 115 160 198 72 110 56 121 134 69 102 72 162 44 56 132 130 226 152----------- 95% 94% 96% 95% 94% 95% 96% 97% 96% 96% 91% 95% 94% 96% 96% 93% 94% 97% 97% 93%TOTAL DISAGREE 20 7 5 8 12 4 4 2 5 6 7 5 5 6 2 4 8 4 8 12-------------- 5% 6% 4% 5% 6% 5% 4% 3% 4% 4% 9% 5% 6% 4% 4% 7% 6% 3% 3% 7% STRONGLY AGREE 158 36 48 74 77 30 51 26 48 59 25 45 25 68 20 21 53 56 93 64 40% 32% 40% 44% 37% 39% 45% 45% 38% 42% 33% 42% 32% 40% 43% 35% 38% 42% 40% 39% SOMEWHAT AGREE 222 69 67 86 121 42 59 30 73 75 44 57 47 94 24 35 79 74 133 88 56% 62% 56% 51% 58% 55% 52% 52% 58% 54% 58% 53% 61% 56% 52% 58% 56% 55% 57% 54% SOMEWHAT DISAGREE 19 7 5 7 11 4 4 2 4 6 7 5 4 6 2 4 8 3 7 12 5% 6% 4% 4% 5% 5% 4% 3% 3% 4% 9% 5% 5% 4% 4% 7% 6% 2% 3% 7% STRONGLY DISAGREE 1 - - 1 1 - - - 1 - - - 1 - - - - 1 1 - - - - 1% - - - - 1% - - - 1% - - - - 1% - - P U B L I C O P I N I O N S T R A T E G I E S
    • WORKPLACE WELLNESS INITIATIVES STUDY / 12430 / SEPTEMBER 2012 PAGE 53Table 18-2QUESTION 11:Below are a series of different viewpoints on worksite wellness initiatives. For each one, please select if you AGREE or DISAGREE with a particular position.Worksite wellness initiatives help workers develop healthier lifestyles.BANNER 2 WELLNESS ROLE OF IMPORTANT ISSUES (%10) HEALTH CONCERNS (COMBINED) - BENEFICIAL STATE/LOCAL GOVT ROLE OF FED GOVT ======================== =============================== ================= ================= ================= DECR LACK HIGH NOT INSU- PROD- WORK- OBES- STRESS OF CHRON BLOOD VERY/ MORE LESS NO MORE LESS NO RANCE UCTI- ABSEN- ERS ITY/ /MEN- FIT- DIS- PRE- AT ACT- ACT- CHAN- ACT- ACT- CHAN- TOTAL COSTS VITY TEEISM COMP WEIGHT TAL NESS EASE SSURE VERY SMWT ALL IVE IVE GE IVE IVE GE ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ------ ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----BASE=TOTAL ASKED 400 194 139 120 110 206 206 203 131 134 151 198 49 182 58 148 151 77 155 100% 49% 35% 30% 28% 52% 52% 51% 33% 34% 38% 50% 12% 46% 15% 37% 38% 19% 39%**D/S (AGREE - DISAGREE) 360 178 133 114 104 184 192 181 113 120 147 178 35 166 50 134 143 65 139 90% 92% 96% 95% 95% 89% 93% 89% 86% 90% 97% 90% 71% 91% 86% 91% 95% 84% 90%TOTAL AGREE 380 186 136 117 107 195 199 192 122 127 149 188 42 174 54 141 147 71 147----------- 95% 96% 98% 98% 97% 95% 97% 95% 93% 95% 99% 95% 86% 96% 93% 95% 97% 92% 95%TOTAL DISAGREE 20 8 3 3 3 11 7 11 9 7 2 10 7 8 4 7 4 6 8-------------- 5% 4% 2% 3% 3% 5% 3% 5% 7% 5% 1% 5% 14% 4% 7% 5% 3% 8% 5% STRONGLY AGREE 158 92 66 56 54 83 88 93 44 50 95 55 8 85 13 55 70 20 61 40% 47% 47% 47% 49% 40% 43% 46% 34% 37% 63% 28% 16% 47% 22% 37% 46% 26% 39% SOMEWHAT AGREE 222 94 70 61 53 112 111 99 78 77 54 133 34 89 41 86 77 51 86 56% 48% 50% 51% 48% 54% 54% 49% 60% 57% 36% 67% 69% 49% 71% 58% 51% 66% 55% SOMEWHAT DISAGREE 19 7 2 2 2 10 7 11 9 7 2 10 6 8 3 7 4 5 8 5% 4% 1% 2% 2% 5% 3% 5% 7% 5% 1% 5% 12% 4% 5% 5% 3% 6% 5% STRONGLY DISAGREE 1 1 1 1 1 1 - - - - - - 1 - 1 - - 1 - - 1% 1% 1% 1% - - - - - - - 2% - 2% - - 1% - P U B L I C O P I N I O N S T R A T E G I E S
    • WORKPLACE WELLNESS INITIATIVES STUDY / 12430 / SEPTEMBER 2012 PAGE 54Table 18-3QUESTION 11:Below are a series of different viewpoints on worksite wellness initiatives. For each one, please select if you AGREE or DISAGREE with a particular position.Worksite wellness initiatives help workers develop healthier lifestyles.BANNER 3 ------------------- AMONG THOSE WITH WELLNESS INITIATIVE --------------------- HAVE WELLNESS % OF YEARS FINANCIAL EMPLOYEE ACCESS INITATIVE OPERATING BUDGET IN OPERATION INCENTIVE ROI TO INITIATIVE =========== ================= ================= =========== =========== ================== 6% OR 1-2 3-4 5+ TOTAL YES NO 0-1% 2-5% MORE YRS YRS YRS YES NO YES NO 0-74% 75-84% 85%+ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ -----BASE=TOTAL ASKED 400 220 180 77 63 25 71 42 89 110 108 89 122 18 13 169 100% 55% 45% 35% 29% 11% 32% 19% 40% 50% 49% 40% 55% 8% 6% 77%**D/S (AGREE - DISAGREE) 360 200 160 73 57 19 67 38 79 100 98 81 112 16 9 157 90% 91% 89% 95% 90% 76% 94% 90% 89% 91% 91% 91% 92% 89% 69% 93%TOTAL AGREE 380 210 170 75 60 22 69 40 84 105 103 85 117 17 11 163----------- 95% 95% 94% 97% 95% 88% 97% 95% 94% 95% 95% 96% 96% 94% 85% 96%TOTAL DISAGREE 20 10 10 2 3 3 2 2 5 5 5 4 5 1 2 6-------------- 5% 5% 6% 3% 5% 12% 3% 5% 6% 5% 5% 4% 4% 6% 15% 4% STRONGLY AGREE 158 97 61 30 31 10 39 13 36 49 47 47 43 7 4 75 40% 44% 34% 39% 49% 40% 55% 31% 40% 45% 44% 53% 35% 39% 31% 44% SOMEWHAT AGREE 222 113 109 45 29 12 30 27 48 56 56 38 74 10 7 88 56% 51% 61% 58% 46% 48% 42% 64% 54% 51% 52% 43% 61% 56% 54% 52% SOMEWHAT DISAGREE 19 9 10 2 2 3 2 1 5 4 5 3 5 1 2 5 5% 4% 6% 3% 3% 12% 3% 2% 6% 4% 5% 3% 4% 6% 15% 3% STRONGLY DISAGREE 1 1 - - 1 - - 1 - 1 - 1 - - - 1 - - - - 2% - - 2% - 1% - 1% - - - 1% P U B L I C O P I N I O N S T R A T E G I E S
    • WORKPLACE WELLNESS INITIATIVES STUDY / 12430 / SEPTEMBER 2012 PAGE 55Table 19-1QUESTION 12:Below are a series of different viewpoints on worksite wellness initiatives. For each one, please select if you AGREE or DISAGREE with a particular position.Worksite wellness initiatives make employees feel that their privacy is being intruded upon.BANNER 1 ORG HEALTH ORGANIZATION SIZE PROFIT STATUS REGION EMPLOYEES W/ CARE YEARS IN OPERATION GRADE ================= ================= ======================= ================== ======================= =========== NON- 100- PRIV- PUB- PROF/ NORTH MID- 0-10 11-20 21-50 51+ TOTAL 1-99 499 500+ ATE LIC GOVT -EAST SOUTH WEST WEST 0-74% 75-84% 85%+ YRS YRS YRS YRS A/B C/D/F ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----BASE=TOTAL ASKED 400 111 121 168 208 77 115 59 127 140 74 107 77 167 46 61 141 134 230 168 100% 28% 30% 42% 52% 19% 29% 15% 32% 35% 19% 27% 19% 42% 12% 15% 35% 34% 58% 42%**D/S (AGREE - DISAGREE) 6 5 -3 4 16 3 -13 -3 5 14 -10 9 3 -1 -10 3 7 2 -14 20 2% 5% -2% 2% 8% 4% -11% -5% 4% 10% -14% 8% 4% -1% -22% 5% 5% 1% -6% 12%TOTAL AGREE 203 58 59 86 112 40 51 28 66 77 32 58 40 83 18 32 74 68 108 94----------- 51% 52% 49% 51% 54% 52% 44% 47% 52% 55% 43% 54% 52% 50% 39% 52% 52% 51% 47% 56%TOTAL DISAGREE 197 53 62 82 96 37 64 31 61 63 42 49 37 84 28 29 67 66 122 74-------------- 49% 48% 51% 49% 46% 48% 56% 53% 48% 45% 57% 46% 48% 50% 61% 48% 48% 49% 53% 44% STRONGLY AGREE 28 7 8 13 18 4 6 2 9 12 5 7 8 8 3 3 8 10 13 15 7% 6% 7% 8% 9% 5% 5% 3% 7% 9% 7% 7% 10% 5% 7% 5% 6% 7% 6% 9% SOMEWHAT AGREE 175 51 51 73 94 36 45 26 57 65 27 51 32 75 15 29 66 58 95 79 44% 46% 42% 43% 45% 47% 39% 44% 45% 46% 36% 48% 42% 45% 33% 48% 47% 43% 41% 47% SOMEWHAT DISAGREE 145 40 46 59 67 29 49 26 38 42 39 39 30 56 19 23 47 51 86 58 36% 36% 38% 35% 32% 38% 43% 44% 30% 30% 53% 36% 39% 34% 41% 38% 33% 38% 37% 35% STRONGLY DISAGREE 52 13 16 23 29 8 15 5 23 21 3 10 7 28 9 6 20 15 36 16 13% 12% 13% 14% 14% 10% 13% 8% 18% 15% 4% 9% 9% 17% 20% 10% 14% 11% 16% 10% P U B L I C O P I N I O N S T R A T E G I E S
    • WORKPLACE WELLNESS INITIATIVES STUDY / 12430 / SEPTEMBER 2012 PAGE 56Table 19-2QUESTION 12:Below are a series of different viewpoints on worksite wellness initiatives. For each one, please select if you AGREE or DISAGREE with a particular position.Worksite wellness initiatives make employees feel that their privacy is being intruded upon.BANNER 2 WELLNESS ROLE OF IMPORTANT ISSUES (%10) HEALTH CONCERNS (COMBINED) - BENEFICIAL STATE/LOCAL GOVT ROLE OF FED GOVT ======================== =============================== ================= ================= ================= DECR LACK HIGH NOT INSU- PROD- WORK- OBES- STRESS OF CHRON BLOOD VERY/ MORE LESS NO MORE LESS NO RANCE UCTI- ABSEN- ERS ITY/ /MEN- FIT- DIS- PRE- AT ACT- ACT- CHAN- ACT- ACT- CHAN- TOTAL COSTS VITY TEEISM COMP WEIGHT TAL NESS EASE SSURE VERY SMWT ALL IVE IVE GE IVE IVE GE ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ------ ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----BASE=TOTAL ASKED 400 194 139 119 109 207 205 203 132 134 152 197 49 183 59 147 151 78 155 100% 49% 35% 30% 27% 52% 51% 51% 33% 34% 38% 49% 12% 46% 15% 37% 38% 20% 39%**D/S (AGREE - DISAGREE) 6 10 -3 -7 -1 -11 -3 -11 16 20 -24 25 7 3 11 -5 1 6 7 2% 5% -2% -6% -1% -5% -1% -5% 12% 15% -16% 13% 14% 2% 19% -3% 1% 8% 5%TOTAL AGREE 203 102 68 56 54 98 101 96 74 77 64 111 28 93 35 71 76 42 81----------- 51% 53% 49% 47% 50% 47% 49% 47% 56% 57% 42% 56% 57% 51% 59% 48% 50% 54% 52%TOTAL DISAGREE 197 92 71 63 55 109 104 107 58 57 88 86 21 90 24 76 75 36 74-------------- 49% 47% 51% 53% 50% 53% 51% 53% 44% 43% 58% 44% 43% 49% 41% 52% 50% 46% 48% STRONGLY AGREE 28 15 17 12 13 10 13 13 13 8 9 14 5 10 6 10 10 5 11 7% 8% 12% 10% 12% 5% 6% 6% 10% 6% 6% 7% 10% 5% 10% 7% 7% 6% 7% SOMEWHAT AGREE 175 87 51 44 41 88 88 83 61 69 55 97 23 83 29 61 66 37 70 44% 45% 37% 37% 38% 43% 43% 41% 46% 51% 36% 49% 47% 45% 49% 41% 44% 47% 45% SOMEWHAT DISAGREE 145 66 48 40 35 79 74 78 44 41 56 72 16 66 20 55 57 28 51 36% 34% 35% 34% 32% 38% 36% 38% 33% 31% 37% 37% 33% 36% 34% 37% 38% 36% 33% STRONGLY DISAGREE 52 26 23 23 20 30 30 29 14 16 32 14 5 24 4 21 18 8 23 13% 13% 17% 19% 18% 14% 15% 14% 11% 12% 21% 7% 10% 13% 7% 14% 12% 10% 15% P U B L I C O P I N I O N S T R A T E G I E S
    • WORKPLACE WELLNESS INITIATIVES STUDY / 12430 / SEPTEMBER 2012 PAGE 57Table 19-3QUESTION 12:Below are a series of different viewpoints on worksite wellness initiatives. For each one, please select if you AGREE or DISAGREE with a particular position.Worksite wellness initiatives make employees feel that their privacy is being intruded upon.BANNER 3 ------------------- AMONG THOSE WITH WELLNESS INITIATIVE --------------------- HAVE WELLNESS % OF YEARS FINANCIAL EMPLOYEE ACCESS INITATIVE OPERATING BUDGET IN OPERATION INCENTIVE ROI TO INITIATIVE =========== ================= ================= =========== =========== ================== 6% OR 1-2 3-4 5+ TOTAL YES NO 0-1% 2-5% MORE YRS YRS YRS YES NO YES NO 0-74% 75-84% 85%+ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ -----BASE=TOTAL ASKED 400 222 178 78 64 25 73 43 89 111 110 90 124 19 13 171 100% 56% 45% 35% 29% 11% 33% 19% 40% 50% 50% 41% 56% 9% 6% 77%**D/S (AGREE - DISAGREE) 6 -2 8 2 -8 3 1 3 -5 21 -24 -8 4 1 1 -5 2% -1% 4% 3% -13% 12% 1% 7% -6% 19% -22% -9% 3% 5% 8% -3%TOTAL AGREE 203 110 93 40 28 14 37 23 42 66 43 41 64 10 7 83----------- 51% 50% 52% 51% 44% 56% 51% 53% 47% 59% 39% 46% 52% 53% 54% 49%TOTAL DISAGREE 197 112 85 38 36 11 36 20 47 45 67 49 60 9 6 88-------------- 49% 50% 48% 49% 56% 44% 49% 47% 53% 41% 61% 54% 48% 47% 46% 51% STRONGLY AGREE 28 15 13 3 4 3 7 3 4 8 6 7 7 1 - 11 7% 7% 7% 4% 6% 12% 10% 7% 4% 7% 5% 8% 6% 5% - 6% SOMEWHAT AGREE 175 95 80 37 24 11 30 20 38 58 37 34 57 9 7 72 44% 43% 45% 47% 38% 44% 41% 47% 43% 52% 34% 38% 46% 47% 54% 42% SOMEWHAT DISAGREE 145 75 70 24 24 6 24 12 32 27 48 30 45 7 4 58 36% 34% 39% 31% 38% 24% 33% 28% 36% 24% 44% 33% 36% 37% 31% 34% STRONGLY DISAGREE 52 37 15 14 12 5 12 8 15 18 19 19 15 2 2 30 13% 17% 8% 18% 19% 20% 16% 19% 17% 16% 17% 21% 12% 11% 15% 18% P U B L I C O P I N I O N S T R A T E G I E S
    • WORKPLACE WELLNESS INITIATIVES STUDY / 12430 / SEPTEMBER 2012 PAGE 58Table 20-1QUESTION 13:Below are a series of different viewpoints on worksite wellness initiatives. For each one, please select if you AGREE or DISAGREE with a particular position.Worksite wellness initiatives reduce worker absenteeism.BANNER 1 ORG HEALTH ORGANIZATION SIZE PROFIT STATUS REGION EMPLOYEES W/ CARE YEARS IN OPERATION GRADE ================= ================= ======================= ================== ======================= =========== NON- 100- PRIV- PUB- PROF/ NORTH MID- 0-10 11-20 21-50 51+ TOTAL 1-99 499 500+ ATE LIC GOVT -EAST SOUTH WEST WEST 0-74% 75-84% 85%+ YRS YRS YRS YRS A/B C/D/F ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----BASE=TOTAL ASKED 396 110 121 165 207 75 114 60 124 138 74 107 76 164 44 61 139 133 231 163 100% 28% 31% 42% 52% 19% 29% 15% 31% 35% 19% 27% 19% 41% 11% 15% 35% 34% 58% 41%**D/S (AGREE - DISAGREE) 222 60 69 93 115 41 66 34 70 82 36 73 40 78 36 27 59 89 137 83 56% 55% 57% 56% 56% 55% 58% 57% 56% 59% 49% 68% 53% 48% 82% 44% 42% 67% 59% 51%TOTAL AGREE 309 85 95 129 161 58 90 47 97 110 55 90 58 121 40 44 99 111 184 123----------- 78% 77% 79% 78% 78% 77% 79% 78% 78% 80% 74% 84% 76% 74% 91% 72% 71% 83% 80% 75%TOTAL DISAGREE 87 25 26 36 46 17 24 13 27 28 19 17 18 43 4 17 40 22 47 40-------------- 22% 23% 21% 22% 22% 23% 21% 22% 22% 20% 26% 16% 24% 26% 9% 28% 29% 17% 20% 25% STRONGLY AGREE 74 14 22 38 39 14 21 18 18 23 15 22 10 34 12 7 26 24 43 30 19% 13% 18% 23% 19% 19% 18% 30% 15% 17% 20% 21% 13% 21% 27% 11% 19% 18% 19% 18% SOMEWHAT AGREE 235 71 73 91 122 44 69 29 79 87 40 68 48 87 28 37 73 87 141 93 59% 65% 60% 55% 59% 59% 61% 48% 64% 63% 54% 64% 63% 53% 64% 61% 53% 65% 61% 57% SOMEWHAT DISAGREE 79 23 22 34 40 17 22 13 23 24 19 16 16 38 4 14 36 21 41 38 20% 21% 18% 21% 19% 23% 19% 22% 19% 17% 26% 15% 21% 23% 9% 23% 26% 16% 18% 23% STRONGLY DISAGREE 8 2 4 2 6 - 2 - 4 4 - 1 2 5 - 3 4 1 6 2 2% 2% 3% 1% 3% - 2% - 3% 3% - 1% 3% 3% - 5% 3% 1% 3% 1% P U B L I C O P I N I O N S T R A T E G I E S
    • WORKPLACE WELLNESS INITIATIVES STUDY / 12430 / SEPTEMBER 2012 PAGE 59Table 20-2QUESTION 13:Below are a series of different viewpoints on worksite wellness initiatives. For each one, please select if you AGREE or DISAGREE with a particular position.Worksite wellness initiatives reduce worker absenteeism.BANNER 2 WELLNESS ROLE OF IMPORTANT ISSUES (%10) HEALTH CONCERNS (COMBINED) - BENEFICIAL STATE/LOCAL GOVT ROLE OF FED GOVT ======================== =============================== ================= ================= ================= DECR LACK HIGH NOT INSU- PROD- WORK- OBES- STRESS OF CHRON BLOOD VERY/ MORE LESS NO MORE LESS NO RANCE UCTI- ABSEN- ERS ITY/ /MEN- FIT- DIS- PRE- AT ACT- ACT- CHAN- ACT- ACT- CHAN- TOTAL COSTS VITY TEEISM COMP WEIGHT TAL NESS EASE SSURE VERY SMWT ALL IVE IVE GE IVE IVE GE ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ------ ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----BASE=TOTAL ASKED 396 191 137 117 109 204 203 198 131 134 149 197 49 179 59 147 149 76 156 100% 48% 35% 30% 28% 52% 51% 50% 33% 34% 38% 50% 12% 45% 15% 37% 38% 19% 39%**D/S (AGREE - DISAGREE) 222 119 85 71 71 116 115 118 65 74 121 97 5 105 23 87 91 30 94 56% 62% 62% 61% 65% 57% 57% 60% 50% 55% 81% 49% 10% 59% 39% 59% 61% 39% 60%TOTAL AGREE 309 155 111 94 90 160 159 158 98 104 135 147 27 142 41 117 120 53 125----------- 78% 81% 81% 80% 83% 78% 78% 80% 75% 78% 91% 75% 55% 79% 69% 80% 81% 70% 80%TOTAL DISAGREE 87 36 26 23 19 44 44 40 33 30 14 50 22 37 18 30 29 23 31-------------- 22% 19% 19% 20% 17% 22% 22% 20% 25% 22% 9% 25% 45% 21% 31% 20% 19% 30% 20% STRONGLY AGREE 74 46 34 33 35 40 44 39 20 23 52 19 3 43 7 20 39 8 23 19% 24% 25% 28% 32% 20% 22% 20% 15% 17% 35% 10% 6% 24% 12% 14% 26% 11% 15% SOMEWHAT AGREE 235 109 77 61 55 120 115 119 78 81 83 128 24 99 34 97 81 45 102 59% 57% 56% 52% 50% 59% 57% 60% 60% 60% 56% 65% 49% 55% 58% 66% 54% 59% 65% SOMEWHAT DISAGREE 79 32 22 19 17 37 41 37 28 28 13 47 18 34 16 27 28 21 26 20% 17% 16% 16% 16% 18% 20% 19% 21% 21% 9% 24% 37% 19% 27% 18% 19% 28% 17% STRONGLY DISAGREE 8 4 4 4 2 7 3 3 5 2 1 3 4 3 2 3 1 2 5 2% 2% 3% 3% 2% 3% 1% 2% 4% 1% 1% 2% 8% 2% 3% 2% 1% 3% 3% P U B L I C O P I N I O N S T R A T E G I E S
    • WORKPLACE WELLNESS INITIATIVES STUDY / 12430 / SEPTEMBER 2012 PAGE 60Table 20-3QUESTION 13:Below are a series of different viewpoints on worksite wellness initiatives. For each one, please select if you AGREE or DISAGREE with a particular position.Worksite wellness initiatives reduce worker absenteeism.BANNER 3 ------------------- AMONG THOSE WITH WELLNESS INITIATIVE --------------------- HAVE WELLNESS % OF YEARS FINANCIAL EMPLOYEE ACCESS INITATIVE OPERATING BUDGET IN OPERATION INCENTIVE ROI TO INITIATIVE =========== ================= ================= =========== =========== ================== 6% OR 1-2 3-4 5+ TOTAL YES NO 0-1% 2-5% MORE YRS YRS YRS YES NO YES NO 0-74% 75-84% 85%+ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ -----BASE=TOTAL ASKED 396 218 178 76 63 24 72 40 89 107 110 88 122 19 13 167 100% 55% 45% 35% 29% 11% 33% 18% 41% 49% 50% 40% 56% 9% 6% 77%**D/S (AGREE - DISAGREE) 222 126 96 36 37 18 44 14 57 71 54 56 62 15 5 93 56% 58% 54% 47% 59% 75% 61% 35% 64% 66% 49% 64% 51% 79% 38% 56%TOTAL AGREE 309 172 137 56 50 21 58 27 73 89 82 72 92 17 9 130----------- 78% 79% 77% 74% 79% 88% 81% 68% 82% 83% 75% 82% 75% 89% 69% 78%TOTAL DISAGREE 87 46 41 20 13 3 14 13 16 18 28 16 30 2 4 37-------------- 22% 21% 23% 26% 21% 13% 19% 33% 18% 17% 25% 18% 25% 11% 31% 22% STRONGLY AGREE 74 49 25 13 12 7 20 7 17 27 21 25 21 4 4 35 19% 22% 14% 17% 19% 29% 28% 18% 19% 25% 19% 28% 17% 21% 31% 21% SOMEWHAT AGREE 235 123 112 43 38 14 38 20 56 62 61 47 71 13 5 95 59% 56% 63% 57% 60% 58% 53% 50% 63% 58% 55% 53% 58% 68% 38% 57% SOMEWHAT DISAGREE 79 41 38 16 12 3 14 10 14 16 25 15 26 2 4 32 20% 19% 21% 21% 19% 13% 19% 25% 16% 15% 23% 17% 21% 11% 31% 19% STRONGLY DISAGREE 8 5 3 4 1 - - 3 2 2 3 1 4 - - 5 2% 2% 2% 5% 2% - - 8% 2% 2% 3% 1% 3% - - 3% P U B L I C O P I N I O N S T R A T E G I E S
    • WORKPLACE WELLNESS INITIATIVES STUDY / 12430 / SEPTEMBER 2012 PAGE 61Table 21-1QUESTION 14:Below are a series of different viewpoints on worksite wellness initiatives. For each one, please select if you AGREE or DISAGREE with a particular position.Worksite wellness initiatives increase worker productivity.BANNER 1 ORG HEALTH ORGANIZATION SIZE PROFIT STATUS REGION EMPLOYEES W/ CARE YEARS IN OPERATION GRADE ================= ================= ======================= ================== ======================= =========== NON- 100- PRIV- PUB- PROF/ NORTH MID- 0-10 11-20 21-50 51+ TOTAL 1-99 499 500+ ATE LIC GOVT -EAST SOUTH WEST WEST 0-74% 75-84% 85%+ YRS YRS YRS YRS A/B C/D/F ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----BASE=TOTAL ASKED 400 112 122 166 210 75 115 61 124 139 76 108 77 167 46 60 140 134 233 165 100% 28% 31% 42% 53% 19% 29% 15% 31% 35% 19% 27% 19% 42% 12% 15% 35% 34% 58% 41%**D/S (AGREE - DISAGREE) 268 72 86 110 142 51 75 37 74 99 58 76 51 117 36 34 92 98 159 107 67% 64% 70% 66% 68% 68% 65% 61% 60% 71% 76% 70% 66% 70% 78% 57% 66% 73% 68% 65%TOTAL AGREE 334 92 104 138 176 63 95 49 99 119 67 92 64 142 41 47 116 116 196 136----------- 84% 82% 85% 83% 84% 84% 83% 80% 80% 86% 88% 85% 83% 85% 89% 78% 83% 87% 84% 82%TOTAL DISAGREE 66 20 18 28 34 12 20 12 25 20 9 16 13 25 5 13 24 18 37 29-------------- 17% 18% 15% 17% 16% 16% 17% 20% 20% 14% 12% 15% 17% 15% 11% 22% 17% 13% 16% 18% STRONGLY AGREE 91 22 25 44 45 19 27 18 25 27 21 25 11 44 12 7 37 29 56 34 23% 20% 20% 27% 21% 25% 23% 30% 20% 19% 28% 23% 14% 26% 26% 12% 26% 22% 24% 21% SOMEWHAT AGREE 243 70 79 94 131 44 68 31 74 92 46 67 53 98 29 40 79 87 140 102 61% 63% 65% 57% 62% 59% 59% 51% 60% 66% 61% 62% 69% 59% 63% 67% 56% 65% 60% 62% SOMEWHAT DISAGREE 58 18 16 24 28 11 19 10 23 17 8 15 11 22 4 12 21 15 33 25 15% 16% 13% 14% 13% 15% 17% 16% 19% 12% 11% 14% 14% 13% 9% 20% 15% 11% 14% 15% STRONGLY DISAGREE 8 2 2 4 6 1 1 2 2 3 1 1 2 3 1 1 3 3 4 4 2% 2% 2% 2% 3% 1% 1% 3% 2% 2% 1% 1% 3% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% P U B L I C O P I N I O N S T R A T E G I E S
    • WORKPLACE WELLNESS INITIATIVES STUDY / 12430 / SEPTEMBER 2012 PAGE 62Table 21-2QUESTION 14:Below are a series of different viewpoints on worksite wellness initiatives. For each one, please select if you AGREE or DISAGREE with a particular position.Worksite wellness initiatives increase worker productivity.BANNER 2 WELLNESS ROLE OF IMPORTANT ISSUES (%10) HEALTH CONCERNS (COMBINED) - BENEFICIAL STATE/LOCAL GOVT ROLE OF FED GOVT ======================== =============================== ================= ================= ================= DECR LACK HIGH NOT INSU- PROD- WORK- OBES- STRESS OF CHRON BLOOD VERY/ MORE LESS NO MORE LESS NO RANCE UCTI- ABSEN- ERS ITY/ /MEN- FIT- DIS- PRE- AT ACT- ACT- CHAN- ACT- ACT- CHAN- TOTAL COSTS VITY TEEISM COMP WEIGHT TAL NESS EASE SSURE VERY SMWT ALL IVE IVE GE IVE IVE GE ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ------ ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----BASE=TOTAL ASKED 400 193 138 118 109 207 206 204 130 134 151 196 51 182 60 146 151 79 154 100% 48% 35% 30% 27% 52% 52% 51% 33% 34% 38% 49% 13% 46% 15% 37% 38% 20% 39%**D/S (AGREE - DISAGREE) 268 149 108 98 83 153 124 146 82 86 139 124 5 140 26 92 115 41 100 67% 77% 78% 83% 76% 74% 60% 72% 63% 64% 92% 63% 10% 77% 43% 63% 76% 52% 65%TOTAL AGREE 334 171 123 108 96 180 165 175 106 110 145 160 28 161 43 119 133 60 127----------- 84% 89% 89% 92% 88% 87% 80% 86% 82% 82% 96% 82% 55% 88% 72% 82% 88% 76% 82%TOTAL DISAGREE 66 22 15 10 13 27 41 29 24 24 6 36 23 21 17 27 18 19 27-------------- 17% 11% 11% 8% 12% 13% 20% 14% 18% 18% 4% 18% 45% 12% 28% 18% 12% 24% 18% STRONGLY AGREE 91 61 43 35 38 46 51 50 27 29 63 25 2 49 11 27 46 15 26 23% 32% 31% 30% 35% 22% 25% 25% 21% 22% 42% 13% 4% 27% 18% 18% 30% 19% 17% SOMEWHAT AGREE 243 110 80 73 58 134 114 125 79 81 82 135 26 112 32 92 87 45 101 61% 57% 58% 62% 53% 65% 55% 61% 61% 60% 54% 69% 51% 62% 53% 63% 58% 57% 66% SOMEWHAT DISAGREE 58 19 12 7 11 22 38 24 21 24 5 32 20 17 16 24 17 17 22 15% 10% 9% 6% 10% 11% 18% 12% 16% 18% 3% 16% 39% 9% 27% 16% 11% 22% 14% STRONGLY DISAGREE 8 3 3 3 2 5 3 5 3 - 1 4 3 4 1 3 1 2 5 2% 2% 2% 3% 2% 2% 1% 2% 2% - 1% 2% 6% 2% 2% 2% 1% 3% 3% P U B L I C O P I N I O N S T R A T E G I E S
    • WORKPLACE WELLNESS INITIATIVES STUDY / 12430 / SEPTEMBER 2012 PAGE 63Table 21-3QUESTION 14:Below are a series of different viewpoints on worksite wellness initiatives. For each one, please select if you AGREE or DISAGREE with a particular position.Worksite wellness initiatives increase worker productivity.BANNER 3 ------------------- AMONG THOSE WITH WELLNESS INITIATIVE --------------------- HAVE WELLNESS % OF YEARS FINANCIAL EMPLOYEE ACCESS INITATIVE OPERATING BUDGET IN OPERATION INCENTIVE ROI TO INITIATIVE =========== ================= ================= =========== =========== ================== 6% OR 1-2 3-4 5+ TOTAL YES NO 0-1% 2-5% MORE YRS YRS YRS YES NO YES NO 0-74% 75-84% 85%+ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ -----BASE=TOTAL ASKED 400 221 179 77 64 24 72 42 89 109 110 89 123 19 13 169 100% 55% 45% 35% 29% 11% 33% 19% 40% 49% 50% 40% 56% 9% 6% 76%**D/S (AGREE - DISAGREE) 268 149 119 45 52 14 56 16 67 75 72 65 77 13 3 119 67% 67% 66% 58% 81% 58% 78% 38% 75% 69% 65% 73% 63% 68% 23% 70%TOTAL AGREE 334 185 149 61 58 19 64 29 78 92 91 77 100 16 8 144----------- 84% 84% 83% 79% 91% 79% 89% 69% 88% 84% 83% 87% 81% 84% 62% 85%TOTAL DISAGREE 66 36 30 16 6 5 8 13 11 17 19 12 23 3 5 25-------------- 17% 16% 17% 21% 9% 21% 11% 31% 12% 16% 17% 13% 19% 16% 38% 15% STRONGLY AGREE 91 60 31 14 16 11 25 6 24 27 32 31 24 6 2 44 23% 27% 17% 18% 25% 46% 35% 14% 27% 25% 29% 35% 20% 32% 15% 26% SOMEWHAT AGREE 243 125 118 47 42 8 39 23 54 65 59 46 76 10 6 100 61% 57% 66% 61% 66% 33% 54% 55% 61% 60% 54% 52% 62% 53% 46% 59% SOMEWHAT DISAGREE 58 29 29 11 5 5 8 7 10 13 16 10 18 3 5 18 15% 13% 16% 14% 8% 21% 11% 17% 11% 12% 15% 11% 15% 16% 38% 11% STRONGLY DISAGREE 8 7 1 5 1 - - 6 1 4 3 2 5 - - 7 2% 3% 1% 6% 2% - - 14% 1% 4% 3% 2% 4% - - 4% P U B L I C O P I N I O N S T R A T E G I E S
    • WORKPLACE WELLNESS INITIATIVES STUDY / 12430 / SEPTEMBER 2012 PAGE 64Table 22-1QUESTION 15:Below are a series of different viewpoints on worksite wellness initiatives. For each one, please select if you AGREE or DISAGREE with a particular position.Worksite wellness initiatives lower health care costs.BANNER 1 ORG HEALTH ORGANIZATION SIZE PROFIT STATUS REGION EMPLOYEES W/ CARE YEARS IN OPERATION GRADE ================= ================= ======================= ================== ======================= =========== NON- 100- PRIV- PUB- PROF/ NORTH MID- 0-10 11-20 21-50 51+ TOTAL 1-99 499 500+ ATE LIC GOVT -EAST SOUTH WEST WEST 0-74% 75-84% 85%+ YRS YRS YRS YRS A/B C/D/F ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----BASE=TOTAL ASKED 401 111 123 167 209 76 116 61 127 139 74 108 78 166 46 61 140 135 232 167 100% 28% 31% 42% 52% 19% 29% 15% 32% 35% 18% 27% 19% 41% 11% 15% 35% 34% 58% 42%**D/S (AGREE - DISAGREE) 273 67 89 117 141 52 80 43 79 97 54 92 54 106 32 43 94 97 162 109 68% 60% 72% 70% 67% 68% 69% 70% 62% 70% 73% 85% 69% 64% 70% 70% 67% 72% 70% 65%TOTAL AGREE 337 89 106 142 175 64 98 52 103 118 64 100 66 136 39 52 117 116 197 138----------- 84% 80% 86% 85% 84% 84% 84% 85% 81% 85% 86% 93% 85% 82% 85% 85% 84% 86% 85% 83%TOTAL DISAGREE 64 22 17 25 34 12 18 9 24 21 10 8 12 30 7 9 23 19 35 29-------------- 16% 20% 14% 15% 16% 16% 16% 15% 19% 15% 14% 7% 15% 18% 15% 15% 16% 14% 15% 17% STRONGLY AGREE 125 27 41 57 63 23 39 22 31 48 24 36 24 56 15 19 42 45 75 49 31% 24% 33% 34% 30% 30% 34% 36% 24% 35% 32% 33% 31% 34% 33% 31% 30% 33% 32% 29% SOMEWHAT AGREE 212 62 65 85 112 41 59 30 72 70 40 64 42 80 24 33 75 71 122 89 53% 56% 53% 51% 54% 54% 51% 49% 57% 50% 54% 59% 54% 48% 52% 54% 54% 53% 53% 53% SOMEWHAT DISAGREE 52 18 14 20 27 10 15 9 17 17 9 7 8 25 5 7 19 16 28 24 13% 16% 11% 12% 13% 13% 13% 15% 13% 12% 12% 6% 10% 15% 11% 11% 14% 12% 12% 14% STRONGLY DISAGREE 12 4 3 5 7 2 3 - 7 4 1 1 4 5 2 2 4 3 7 5 3% 4% 2% 3% 3% 3% 3% - 6% 3% 1% 1% 5% 3% 4% 3% 3% 2% 3% 3% P U B L I C O P I N I O N S T R A T E G I E S
    • WORKPLACE WELLNESS INITIATIVES STUDY / 12430 / SEPTEMBER 2012 PAGE 65Table 22-2QUESTION 15:Below are a series of different viewpoints on worksite wellness initiatives. For each one, please select if you AGREE or DISAGREE with a particular position.Worksite wellness initiatives lower health care costs.BANNER 2 WELLNESS ROLE OF IMPORTANT ISSUES (%10) HEALTH CONCERNS (COMBINED) - BENEFICIAL STATE/LOCAL GOVT ROLE OF FED GOVT ======================== =============================== ================= ================= ================= DECR LACK HIGH NOT INSU- PROD- WORK- OBES- STRESS OF CHRON BLOOD VERY/ MORE LESS NO MORE LESS NO RANCE UCTI- ABSEN- ERS ITY/ /MEN- FIT- DIS- PRE- AT ACT- ACT- CHAN- ACT- ACT- CHAN- TOTAL COSTS VITY TEEISM COMP WEIGHT TAL NESS EASE SSURE VERY SMWT ALL IVE IVE GE IVE IVE GE ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ------ ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----BASE=TOTAL ASKED 401 195 140 120 110 208 204 203 132 135 152 197 50 182 60 148 150 79 156 100% 49% 35% 30% 27% 52% 51% 51% 33% 34% 38% 49% 12% 45% 15% 37% 37% 20% 39%**D/S (AGREE - DISAGREE) 273 139 98 86 82 146 140 151 82 91 132 133 8 150 28 88 130 43 92 68% 71% 70% 72% 75% 70% 69% 74% 62% 67% 87% 68% 16% 82% 47% 59% 87% 54% 59%TOTAL AGREE 337 167 119 103 96 177 172 177 107 113 142 165 29 166 44 118 140 61 124----------- 84% 86% 85% 86% 87% 85% 84% 87% 81% 84% 93% 84% 58% 91% 73% 80% 93% 77% 79%TOTAL DISAGREE 64 28 21 17 14 31 32 26 25 22 10 32 21 16 16 30 10 18 32-------------- 16% 14% 15% 14% 13% 15% 16% 13% 19% 16% 7% 16% 42% 9% 27% 20% 7% 23% 21% STRONGLY AGREE 125 72 53 48 48 72 63 68 35 42 76 45 3 73 14 35 59 19 43 31% 37% 38% 40% 44% 35% 31% 33% 27% 31% 50% 23% 6% 40% 23% 24% 39% 24% 28% SOMEWHAT AGREE 212 95 66 55 48 105 109 109 72 71 66 120 26 93 30 83 81 42 81 53% 49% 47% 46% 44% 50% 53% 54% 55% 53% 43% 61% 52% 51% 50% 56% 54% 53% 52% SOMEWHAT DISAGREE 52 22 17 13 11 24 26 23 21 19 6 30 16 11 14 26 7 15 27 13% 11% 12% 11% 10% 12% 13% 11% 16% 14% 4% 15% 32% 6% 23% 18% 5% 19% 17% STRONGLY DISAGREE 12 6 4 4 3 7 6 3 4 3 4 2 5 5 2 4 3 3 5 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 1% 3% 2% 3% 1% 10% 3% 3% 3% 2% 4% 3% P U B L I C O P I N I O N S T R A T E G I E S
    • WORKPLACE WELLNESS INITIATIVES STUDY / 12430 / SEPTEMBER 2012 PAGE 66Table 22-3QUESTION 15:Below are a series of different viewpoints on worksite wellness initiatives. For each one, please select if you AGREE or DISAGREE with a particular position.Worksite wellness initiatives lower health care costs.BANNER 3 ------------------- AMONG THOSE WITH WELLNESS INITIATIVE --------------------- HAVE WELLNESS % OF YEARS FINANCIAL EMPLOYEE ACCESS INITATIVE OPERATING BUDGET IN OPERATION INCENTIVE ROI TO INITIATIVE =========== ================= ================= =========== =========== ================== 6% OR 1-2 3-4 5+ TOTAL YES NO 0-1% 2-5% MORE YRS YRS YRS YES NO YES NO 0-74% 75-84% 85%+ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ -----BASE=TOTAL ASKED 401 221 180 78 64 24 73 43 88 111 109 90 123 19 13 170 100% 55% 45% 35% 29% 11% 33% 19% 40% 50% 49% 41% 56% 9% 6% 77%**D/S (AGREE - DISAGREE) 273 155 118 50 50 16 55 17 72 85 69 74 75 11 9 126 68% 70% 66% 64% 78% 67% 75% 40% 82% 77% 63% 82% 61% 58% 69% 74%TOTAL AGREE 337 188 149 64 57 20 64 30 80 98 89 82 99 15 11 148----------- 84% 85% 83% 82% 89% 83% 88% 70% 91% 88% 82% 91% 80% 79% 85% 87%TOTAL DISAGREE 64 33 31 14 7 4 9 13 8 13 20 8 24 4 2 22-------------- 16% 15% 17% 18% 11% 17% 12% 30% 9% 12% 18% 9% 20% 21% 15% 13% STRONGLY AGREE 125 77 48 25 21 10 27 13 31 43 33 40 32 4 3 64 31% 35% 27% 32% 33% 42% 37% 30% 35% 39% 30% 44% 26% 21% 23% 38% SOMEWHAT AGREE 212 111 101 39 36 10 37 17 49 55 56 42 67 11 8 84 53% 50% 56% 50% 56% 42% 51% 40% 56% 50% 51% 47% 54% 58% 62% 49% SOMEWHAT DISAGREE 52 26 26 11 6 2 7 9 7 10 16 6 20 4 1 17 13% 12% 14% 14% 9% 8% 10% 21% 8% 9% 15% 7% 16% 21% 8% 10% STRONGLY DISAGREE 12 7 5 3 1 2 2 4 1 3 4 2 4 - 1 5 3% 3% 3% 4% 2% 8% 3% 9% 1% 3% 4% 2% 3% - 8% 3% P U B L I C O P I N I O N S T R A T E G I E S
    • WORKPLACE WELLNESS INITIATIVES STUDY / 12430 / SEPTEMBER 2012 PAGE 67Table 23-1QUESTION 16:Below are a series of different viewpoints on worksite wellness initiatives. For each one, please select if you AGREE or DISAGREE with a particular position.Worksite wellness initiatives do little to improve overall worker health.BANNER 1 ORG HEALTH ORGANIZATION SIZE PROFIT STATUS REGION EMPLOYEES W/ CARE YEARS IN OPERATION GRADE ================= ================= ======================= ================== ======================= =========== NON- 100- PRIV- PUB- PROF/ NORTH MID- 0-10 11-20 21-50 51+ TOTAL 1-99 499 500+ ATE LIC GOVT -EAST SOUTH WEST WEST 0-74% 75-84% 85%+ YRS YRS YRS YRS A/B C/D/F ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----BASE=TOTAL ASKED 401 113 122 166 209 76 116 59 126 140 76 107 78 167 46 60 141 134 232 167 100% 28% 30% 41% 52% 19% 29% 15% 31% 35% 19% 27% 19% 42% 11% 15% 35% 33% 58% 42%**D/S (AGREE - DISAGREE) -191 -47 -50 -94 -89 -38 -64 -17 -70 -80 -24 -45 -42 -93 -16 -26 -67 -74 -110 -79 -48% -42% -41% -57% -43% -50% -55% -29% -56% -57% -32% -42% -54% -56% -35% -43% -48% -55% -47% -47%TOTAL AGREE 105 33 36 36 60 19 26 21 28 30 26 31 18 37 15 17 37 30 61 44----------- 26% 29% 30% 22% 29% 25% 22% 36% 22% 21% 34% 29% 23% 22% 33% 28% 26% 22% 26% 26%TOTAL DISAGREE 296 80 86 130 149 57 90 38 98 110 50 76 60 130 31 43 104 104 171 123-------------- 74% 71% 70% 78% 71% 75% 78% 64% 78% 79% 66% 71% 77% 78% 67% 72% 74% 78% 74% 74% STRONGLY AGREE 19 5 8 6 11 3 5 3 7 5 4 3 5 7 3 4 6 5 11 8 5% 4% 7% 4% 5% 4% 4% 5% 6% 4% 5% 3% 6% 4% 7% 7% 4% 4% 5% 5% SOMEWHAT AGREE 86 28 28 30 49 16 21 18 21 25 22 28 13 30 12 13 31 25 50 36 21% 25% 23% 18% 23% 21% 18% 31% 17% 18% 29% 26% 17% 18% 26% 22% 22% 19% 22% 22% SOMEWHAT DISAGREE 193 55 58 80 104 37 52 20 65 77 31 48 44 82 21 28 69 67 107 85 48% 49% 48% 48% 50% 49% 45% 34% 52% 55% 41% 45% 56% 49% 46% 47% 49% 50% 46% 51% STRONGLY DISAGREE 103 25 28 50 45 20 38 18 33 33 19 28 16 48 10 15 35 37 64 38 26% 22% 23% 30% 22% 26% 33% 31% 26% 24% 25% 26% 21% 29% 22% 25% 25% 28% 28% 23% P U B L I C O P I N I O N S T R A T E G I E S
    • WORKPLACE WELLNESS INITIATIVES STUDY / 12430 / SEPTEMBER 2012 PAGE 68Table 23-2QUESTION 16:Below are a series of different viewpoints on worksite wellness initiatives. For each one, please select if you AGREE or DISAGREE with a particular position.Worksite wellness initiatives do little to improve overall worker health.BANNER 2 WELLNESS ROLE OF IMPORTANT ISSUES (%10) HEALTH CONCERNS (COMBINED) - BENEFICIAL STATE/LOCAL GOVT ROLE OF FED GOVT ======================== =============================== ================= ================= ================= DECR LACK HIGH NOT INSU- PROD- WORK- OBES- STRESS OF CHRON BLOOD VERY/ MORE LESS NO MORE LESS NO RANCE UCTI- ABSEN- ERS ITY/ /MEN- FIT- DIS- PRE- AT ACT- ACT- CHAN- ACT- ACT- CHAN- TOTAL COSTS VITY TEEISM COMP WEIGHT TAL NESS EASE SSURE VERY SMWT ALL IVE IVE GE IVE IVE GE ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ------ ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----BASE=TOTAL ASKED 401 194 139 119 109 207 205 202 131 136 152 196 51 182 60 147 150 79 155 100% 48% 35% 30% 27% 52% 51% 50% 33% 34% 38% 49% 13% 45% 15% 37% 37% 20% 39%**D/S (AGREE - DISAGREE) -191 -106 -81 -69 -55 -117 -107 -110 -43 -62 -112 -84 7 -104 -14 -73 -90 -23 -77 -48% -55% -58% -58% -50% -57% -52% -54% -33% -46% -74% -43% 14% -57% -23% -50% -60% -29% -50%TOTAL AGREE 105 44 29 25 27 45 49 46 44 37 20 56 29 39 23 37 30 28 39----------- 26% 23% 21% 21% 25% 22% 24% 23% 34% 27% 13% 29% 57% 21% 38% 25% 20% 35% 25%TOTAL DISAGREE 296 150 110 94 82 162 156 156 87 99 132 140 22 143 37 110 120 51 116-------------- 74% 77% 79% 79% 75% 78% 76% 77% 66% 73% 87% 71% 43% 79% 62% 75% 80% 65% 75% STRONGLY AGREE 19 5 6 5 5 11 8 9 7 6 6 5 8 9 3 6 5 4 9 5% 3% 4% 4% 5% 5% 4% 4% 5% 4% 4% 3% 16% 5% 5% 4% 3% 5% 6% SOMEWHAT AGREE 86 39 23 20 22 34 41 37 37 31 14 51 21 30 20 31 25 24 30 21% 20% 17% 17% 20% 16% 20% 18% 28% 23% 9% 26% 41% 16% 33% 21% 17% 30% 19% SOMEWHAT DISAGREE 193 90 66 58 44 102 99 91 57 72 64 110 17 88 27 77 70 41 79 48% 46% 47% 49% 40% 49% 48% 45% 44% 53% 42% 56% 33% 48% 45% 52% 47% 52% 51% STRONGLY DISAGREE 103 60 44 36 38 60 57 65 30 27 68 30 5 55 10 33 50 10 37 26% 31% 32% 30% 35% 29% 28% 32% 23% 20% 45% 15% 10% 30% 17% 22% 33% 13% 24% P U B L I C O P I N I O N S T R A T E G I E S
    • WORKPLACE WELLNESS INITIATIVES STUDY / 12430 / SEPTEMBER 2012 PAGE 69Table 23-3QUESTION 16:Below are a series of different viewpoints on worksite wellness initiatives. For each one, please select if you AGREE or DISAGREE with a particular position.Worksite wellness initiatives do little to improve overall worker health.BANNER 3 ------------------- AMONG THOSE WITH WELLNESS INITIATIVE --------------------- HAVE WELLNESS % OF YEARS FINANCIAL EMPLOYEE ACCESS INITATIVE OPERATING BUDGET IN OPERATION INCENTIVE ROI TO INITIATIVE =========== ================= ================= =========== =========== ================== 6% OR 1-2 3-4 5+ TOTAL YES NO 0-1% 2-5% MORE YRS YRS YRS YES NO YES NO 0-74% 75-84% 85%+ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ -----BASE=TOTAL ASKED 401 221 180 77 63 25 72 43 88 111 108 90 122 17 13 171 100% 55% 45% 35% 29% 11% 33% 19% 40% 50% 49% 41% 55% 8% 6% 77%**D/S (AGREE - DISAGREE) -191 -119 -72 -39 -33 -17 -38 -17 -52 -57 -62 -56 -58 -11 -5 -95 -48% -54% -40% -51% -52% -68% -53% -40% -59% -51% -57% -62% -48% -65% -38% -56%TOTAL AGREE 105 51 54 19 15 4 17 13 18 27 23 17 32 3 4 38----------- 26% 23% 30% 25% 24% 16% 24% 30% 20% 24% 21% 19% 26% 18% 31% 22%TOTAL DISAGREE 296 170 126 58 48 21 55 30 70 84 85 73 90 14 9 133-------------- 74% 77% 70% 75% 76% 84% 76% 70% 80% 76% 79% 81% 74% 82% 69% 78% STRONGLY AGREE 19 11 8 4 3 1 5 2 4 3 7 3 7 1 1 7 5% 5% 4% 5% 5% 4% 7% 5% 5% 3% 6% 3% 6% 6% 8% 4% SOMEWHAT AGREE 86 40 46 15 12 3 12 11 14 24 16 14 25 2 3 31 21% 18% 26% 19% 19% 12% 17% 26% 16% 22% 15% 16% 20% 12% 23% 18% SOMEWHAT DISAGREE 193 105 88 37 30 11 31 22 43 52 53 40 62 9 5 83 48% 48% 49% 48% 48% 44% 43% 51% 49% 47% 49% 44% 51% 53% 38% 49% STRONGLY DISAGREE 103 65 38 21 18 10 24 8 27 32 32 33 28 5 4 50 26% 29% 21% 27% 29% 40% 33% 19% 31% 29% 30% 37% 23% 29% 31% 29% P U B L I C O P I N I O N S T R A T E G I E S
    • WORKPLACE WELLNESS INITIATIVES STUDY / 12430 / SEPTEMBER 2012 PAGE 70Table 24-1QUESTION 17:Below are a series of different viewpoints on worksite wellness initiatives. For each one, please select if you AGREE or DISAGREE with a particular position.Worksite wellness initiatives only impact a limited number of workers.BANNER 1 ORG HEALTH ORGANIZATION SIZE PROFIT STATUS REGION EMPLOYEES W/ CARE YEARS IN OPERATION GRADE ================= ================= ======================= ================== ======================= =========== NON- 100- PRIV- PUB- PROF/ NORTH MID- 0-10 11-20 21-50 51+ TOTAL 1-99 499 500+ ATE LIC GOVT -EAST SOUTH WEST WEST 0-74% 75-84% 85%+ YRS YRS YRS YRS A/B C/D/F ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----BASE=TOTAL ASKED 403 112 123 168 210 77 116 61 127 140 75 108 78 168 46 61 142 135 233 168 100% 28% 31% 42% 52% 19% 29% 15% 32% 35% 19% 27% 19% 42% 11% 15% 35% 33% 58% 42%**D/S (AGREE - DISAGREE) 117 34 55 28 68 17 32 25 51 32 9 26 24 52 8 33 42 31 57 62 29% 30% 45% 17% 32% 22% 28% 41% 40% 23% 12% 24% 31% 31% 17% 54% 30% 23% 24% 37%TOTAL AGREE 260 73 89 98 139 47 74 43 89 86 42 67 51 110 27 47 92 83 145 115----------- 65% 65% 72% 58% 66% 61% 64% 70% 70% 61% 56% 62% 65% 65% 59% 77% 65% 61% 62% 68%TOTAL DISAGREE 143 39 34 70 71 30 42 18 38 54 33 41 27 58 19 14 50 52 88 53-------------- 35% 35% 28% 42% 34% 39% 36% 30% 30% 39% 44% 38% 35% 35% 41% 23% 35% 39% 38% 32% STRONGLY AGREE 70 17 27 26 35 10 25 16 21 20 13 22 14 26 5 8 26 28 32 38 17% 15% 22% 15% 17% 13% 22% 26% 17% 14% 17% 20% 18% 15% 11% 13% 18% 21% 14% 23% SOMEWHAT AGREE 190 56 62 72 104 37 49 27 68 66 29 45 37 84 22 39 66 55 113 77 47% 50% 50% 43% 50% 48% 42% 44% 54% 47% 39% 42% 47% 50% 48% 64% 46% 41% 48% 46% SOMEWHAT DISAGREE 101 28 25 48 49 19 33 13 24 41 23 31 23 37 13 10 36 38 57 42 25% 25% 20% 29% 23% 25% 28% 21% 19% 29% 31% 29% 29% 22% 28% 16% 25% 28% 24% 25% STRONGLY DISAGREE 42 11 9 22 22 11 9 5 14 13 10 10 4 21 6 4 14 14 31 11 10% 10% 7% 13% 10% 14% 8% 8% 11% 9% 13% 9% 5% 13% 13% 7% 10% 10% 13% 7% P U B L I C O P I N I O N S T R A T E G I E S
    • WORKPLACE WELLNESS INITIATIVES STUDY / 12430 / SEPTEMBER 2012 PAGE 71Table 24-2QUESTION 17:Below are a series of different viewpoints on worksite wellness initiatives. For each one, please select if you AGREE or DISAGREE with a particular position.Worksite wellness initiatives only impact a limited number of workers.BANNER 2 WELLNESS ROLE OF IMPORTANT ISSUES (%10) HEALTH CONCERNS (COMBINED) - BENEFICIAL STATE/LOCAL GOVT ROLE OF FED GOVT ======================== =============================== ================= ================= ================= DECR LACK HIGH NOT INSU- PROD- WORK- OBES- STRESS OF CHRON BLOOD VERY/ MORE LESS NO MORE LESS NO RANCE UCTI- ABSEN- ERS ITY/ /MEN- FIT- DIS- PRE- AT ACT- ACT- CHAN- ACT- ACT- CHAN- TOTAL COSTS VITY TEEISM COMP WEIGHT TAL NESS EASE SSURE VERY SMWT ALL IVE IVE GE IVE IVE GE ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ------ ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----BASE=TOTAL ASKED 403 196 140 120 110 209 206 204 132 135 153 198 50 184 60 148 152 79 156 100% 49% 35% 30% 27% 52% 51% 51% 33% 33% 38% 49% 12% 46% 15% 37% 38% 20% 39%**D/S (AGREE - DISAGREE) 117 52 40 34 32 69 46 56 42 47 3 82 32 38 28 48 28 37 50 29% 27% 29% 28% 29% 33% 22% 27% 32% 35% 2% 41% 64% 21% 47% 32% 18% 47% 32%TOTAL AGREE 260 124 90 77 71 139 126 130 87 91 78 140 41 111 44 98 90 58 103----------- 65% 63% 64% 64% 65% 67% 61% 64% 66% 67% 51% 71% 82% 60% 73% 66% 59% 73% 66%TOTAL DISAGREE 143 72 50 43 39 70 80 74 45 44 75 58 9 73 16 50 62 21 53-------------- 35% 37% 36% 36% 35% 33% 39% 36% 34% 33% 49% 29% 18% 40% 27% 34% 41% 27% 34% STRONGLY AGREE 70 33 25 20 15 39 33 30 24 25 17 38 14 28 12 25 23 18 26 17% 17% 18% 17% 14% 19% 16% 15% 18% 19% 11% 19% 28% 15% 20% 17% 15% 23% 17% SOMEWHAT AGREE 190 91 65 57 56 100 93 100 63 66 61 102 27 83 32 73 67 40 77 47% 46% 46% 48% 51% 48% 45% 49% 48% 49% 40% 52% 54% 45% 53% 49% 44% 51% 49% SOMEWHAT DISAGREE 101 46 32 28 25 48 58 56 28 32 50 42 8 52 10 38 42 13 43 25% 23% 23% 23% 23% 23% 28% 27% 21% 24% 33% 21% 16% 28% 17% 26% 28% 16% 28% STRONGLY DISAGREE 42 26 18 15 14 22 22 18 17 12 25 16 1 21 6 12 20 8 10 10% 13% 13% 13% 13% 11% 11% 9% 13% 9% 16% 8% 2% 11% 10% 8% 13% 10% 6% P U B L I C O P I N I O N S T R A T E G I E S
    • WORKPLACE WELLNESS INITIATIVES STUDY / 12430 / SEPTEMBER 2012 PAGE 72Table 24-3QUESTION 17:Below are a series of different viewpoints on worksite wellness initiatives. For each one, please select if you AGREE or DISAGREE with a particular position.Worksite wellness initiatives only impact a limited number of workers.BANNER 3 ------------------- AMONG THOSE WITH WELLNESS INITIATIVE --------------------- HAVE WELLNESS % OF YEARS FINANCIAL EMPLOYEE ACCESS INITATIVE OPERATING BUDGET IN OPERATION INCENTIVE ROI TO INITIATIVE =========== ================= ================= =========== =========== ================== 6% OR 1-2 3-4 5+ TOTAL YES NO 0-1% 2-5% MORE YRS YRS YRS YES NO YES NO 0-74% 75-84% 85%+ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ -----BASE=TOTAL ASKED 403 222 181 78 64 25 73 43 89 111 110 90 124 19 13 171 100% 55% 45% 35% 29% 11% 33% 19% 40% 50% 50% 41% 56% 9% 6% 77%**D/S (AGREE - DISAGREE) 117 52 65 30 16 -3 19 19 15 27 24 14 34 5 7 35 29% 23% 36% 38% 25% -12% 26% 44% 17% 24% 22% 16% 27% 26% 54% 20%TOTAL AGREE 260 137 123 54 40 11 46 31 52 69 67 52 79 12 10 103----------- 65% 62% 68% 69% 63% 44% 63% 72% 58% 62% 61% 58% 64% 63% 77% 60%TOTAL DISAGREE 143 85 58 24 24 14 27 12 37 42 43 38 45 7 3 68-------------- 35% 38% 32% 31% 38% 56% 37% 28% 42% 38% 39% 42% 36% 37% 23% 40% STRONGLY AGREE 70 43 27 18 14 2 17 10 13 20 22 13 28 7 4 28 17% 19% 15% 23% 22% 8% 23% 23% 15% 18% 20% 14% 23% 37% 31% 16% SOMEWHAT AGREE 190 94 96 36 26 9 29 21 39 49 45 39 51 5 6 75 47% 42% 53% 46% 41% 36% 40% 49% 44% 44% 41% 43% 41% 26% 46% 44% SOMEWHAT DISAGREE 101 57 44 17 18 6 22 7 24 25 32 22 35 5 3 45 25% 26% 24% 22% 28% 24% 30% 16% 27% 23% 29% 24% 28% 26% 23% 26% STRONGLY DISAGREE 42 28 14 7 6 8 5 5 13 17 11 16 10 2 - 23 10% 13% 8% 9% 9% 32% 7% 12% 15% 15% 10% 18% 8% 11% - 13% P U B L I C O P I N I O N S T R A T E G I E S
    • WORKPLACE WELLNESS INITIATIVES STUDY / 12430 / SEPTEMBER 2012 PAGE 73Table 25-1QUESTION 18:Does your organization have a worksite wellness initiative? By a worksite wellness initiative, we mean a coordinated set of strategies that includes environmental supports,health benefits, and workplace policies that are designed to meet the health and safety needs of all employees.BANNER 1 ORG HEALTH ORGANIZATION SIZE PROFIT STATUS REGION EMPLOYEES W/ CARE YEARS IN OPERATION GRADE ================= ================= ======================= ================== ======================= =========== NON- 100- PRIV- PUB- PROF/ NORTH MID- 0-10 11-20 21-50 51+ TOTAL 1-99 499 500+ ATE LIC GOVT -EAST SOUTH WEST WEST 0-74% 75-84% 85%+ YRS YRS YRS YRS A/B C/D/F ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----BASE=TOTAL ASKED 406 113 124 169 212 77 117 61 129 140 76 108 79 169 46 61 144 135 234 169 100% 28% 31% 42% 52% 19% 29% 15% 32% 34% 19% 27% 19% 42% 11% 15% 35% 33% 58% 42%**D/S (YES - NO) 42 -51 6 87 -22 39 25 -3 13 22 10 -10 5 29 -20 -17 10 57 18 23 10% -45% 5% 51% -10% 51% 21% -5% 10% 16% 13% -9% 6% 17% -43% -28% 7% 42% 8% 14%YES 224 31 65 128 95 58 71 29 71 81 43 49 42 99 13 22 77 96 126 96 55% 27% 52% 76% 45% 75% 61% 48% 55% 58% 57% 45% 53% 59% 28% 36% 53% 71% 54% 57%NO 182 82 59 41 117 19 46 32 58 59 33 59 37 70 33 39 67 39 108 73 45% 73% 48% 24% 55% 25% 39% 52% 45% 42% 43% 55% 47% 41% 72% 64% 47% 29% 46% 43% P U B L I C O P I N I O N S T R A T E G I E S
    • WORKPLACE WELLNESS INITIATIVES STUDY / 12430 / SEPTEMBER 2012 PAGE 74Table 25-2QUESTION 18:Does your organization have a worksite wellness initiative? By a worksite wellness initiative, we mean a coordinated set of strategies that includes environmental supports,health benefits, and workplace policies that are designed to meet the health and safety needs of all employees.BANNER 2 WELLNESS ROLE OF IMPORTANT ISSUES (%10) HEALTH CONCERNS (COMBINED) - BENEFICIAL STATE/LOCAL GOVT ROLE OF FED GOVT ======================== =============================== ================= ================= ================= DECR LACK HIGH NOT INSU- PROD- WORK- OBES- STRESS OF CHRON BLOOD VERY/ MORE LESS NO MORE LESS NO RANCE UCTI- ABSEN- ERS ITY/ /MEN- FIT- DIS- PRE- AT ACT- ACT- CHAN- ACT- ACT- CHAN- TOTAL COSTS VITY TEEISM COMP WEIGHT TAL NESS EASE SSURE VERY SMWT ALL IVE IVE GE IVE IVE GE ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ------ ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----BASE=TOTAL ASKED 406 197 140 120 110 211 207 205 133 136 154 199 51 184 60 148 152 79 157 100% 49% 34% 30% 27% 52% 51% 50% 33% 33% 38% 49% 13% 45% 15% 36% 37% 19% 39%**D/S (YES - NO) 42 27 20 20 24 47 31 21 5 24 70 -11 -17 34 -4 4 30 -5 9 10% 14% 14% 17% 22% 22% 15% 10% 4% 18% 45% -6% -33% 18% -7% 3% 20% -6% 6%YES 224 112 80 70 67 129 119 113 69 80 112 94 17 109 28 76 91 37 83 55% 57% 57% 58% 61% 61% 57% 55% 52% 59% 73% 47% 33% 59% 47% 51% 60% 47% 53%NO 182 85 60 50 43 82 88 92 64 56 42 105 34 75 32 72 61 42 74 45% 43% 43% 42% 39% 39% 43% 45% 48% 41% 27% 53% 67% 41% 53% 49% 40% 53% 47% P U B L I C O P I N I O N S T R A T E G I E S
    • WORKPLACE WELLNESS INITIATIVES STUDY / 12430 / SEPTEMBER 2012 PAGE 75Table 25-3QUESTION 18:Does your organization have a worksite wellness initiative? By a worksite wellness initiative, we mean a coordinated set of strategies that includes environmental supports,health benefits, and workplace policies that are designed to meet the health and safety needs of all employees.BANNER 3 ------------------- AMONG THOSE WITH WELLNESS INITIATIVE --------------------- HAVE WELLNESS % OF YEARS FINANCIAL EMPLOYEE ACCESS INITATIVE OPERATING BUDGET IN OPERATION INCENTIVE ROI TO INITIATIVE =========== ================= ================= =========== =========== ================== 6% OR 1-2 3-4 5+ TOTAL YES NO 0-1% 2-5% MORE YRS YRS YRS YES NO YES NO 0-74% 75-84% 85%+ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ -----BASE=TOTAL ASKED 406 224 182 78 64 26 73 43 90 111 110 90 124 19 13 172 100% 55% 45% 35% 29% 12% 33% 19% 40% 50% 49% 40% 55% 8% 6% 77%**D/S (YES - NO) 42 224 -182 78 64 26 73 43 90 111 110 90 124 19 13 172 10% 100% -100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%YES 224 224 - 78 64 26 73 43 90 111 110 90 124 19 13 172 55% 100% - 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%NO 182 - 182 - - - - - - - - - - - - - 45% - 100% - - - - - - - - - - - - - P U B L I C O P I N I O N S T R A T E G I E S
    • WORKPLACE WELLNESS INITIATIVES STUDY / 12430 / SEPTEMBER 2012 PAGE 76Table 26-1QUESTION 19:Approximately what percentage of your organizations operating budget would you say is spent on worksite wellness initiatives that are separate from health insurance coverage?BANNER 1 ORG HEALTH ORGANIZATION SIZE PROFIT STATUS REGION EMPLOYEES W/ CARE YEARS IN OPERATION GRADE ================= ================= ======================= ================== ======================= =========== NON- 100- PRIV- PUB- PROF/ NORTH MID- 0-10 11-20 21-50 51+ TOTAL 1-99 499 500+ ATE LIC GOVT -EAST SOUTH WEST WEST 0-74% 75-84% 85%+ YRS YRS YRS YRS A/B C/D/F ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----BASE=TOTAL ASKED 168 25 54 89 75 44 49 24 50 61 33 43 33 83 10 19 64 71 94 72 100% 15% 32% 53% 45% 26% 29% 14% 30% 36% 20% 26% 20% 49% 6% 11% 38% 42% 56% 43%0%-1% 78 15 32 31 37 13 28 14 18 30 16 24 13 40 5 10 32 31 49 28 46% 60% 59% 35% 49% 30% 57% 58% 36% 49% 48% 56% 39% 48% 50% 53% 50% 44% 52% 39%2-5% 64 8 18 38 30 19 15 8 22 23 11 16 13 30 1 7 27 27 35 29 38% 32% 33% 43% 40% 43% 31% 33% 44% 38% 33% 37% 39% 36% 10% 37% 42% 38% 37% 40%6%+ 26 2 4 20 8 12 6 2 10 8 6 3 7 13 4 2 5 13 10 15 15% 8% 7% 22% 11% 27% 12% 8% 20% 13% 18% 7% 21% 16% 40% 11% 8% 18% 11% 21%MEAN 4.0 2.3 2.5 5.3 3.3 5.7 3.5 2.7 4.8 4.2 3.3 3.3 4.2 4.1 8.7 2.8 3.1 4.2 3.0 5.2 P U B L I C O P I N I O N S T R A T E G I E S
    • WORKPLACE WELLNESS INITIATIVES STUDY / 12430 / SEPTEMBER 2012 PAGE 77Table 26-2QUESTION 19:Approximately what percentage of your organizations operating budget would you say is spent on worksite wellness initiatives that are separate from health insurance coverage?BANNER 2 WELLNESS ROLE OF IMPORTANT ISSUES (%10) HEALTH CONCERNS (COMBINED) - BENEFICIAL STATE/LOCAL GOVT ROLE OF FED GOVT ======================== =============================== ================= ================= ================= DECR LACK HIGH NOT INSU- PROD- WORK- OBES- STRESS OF CHRON BLOOD VERY/ MORE LESS NO MORE LESS NO RANCE UCTI- ABSEN- ERS ITY/ /MEN- FIT- DIS- PRE- AT ACT- ACT- CHAN- ACT- ACT- CHAN- TOTAL COSTS VITY TEEISM COMP WEIGHT TAL NESS EASE SSURE VERY SMWT ALL IVE IVE GE IVE IVE GE ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ------ ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----BASE=TOTAL ASKED 168 81 62 56 51 102 83 86 54 59 81 71 15 88 19 56 72 26 65 100% 48% 37% 33% 30% 61% 49% 51% 32% 35% 48% 42% 9% 52% 11% 33% 43% 15% 39%0%-1% 78 34 28 20 23 49 38 38 26 29 34 38 6 43 4 31 30 11 37 46% 42% 45% 36% 45% 48% 46% 44% 48% 49% 42% 54% 40% 49% 21% 55% 42% 42% 57%2-5% 64 33 22 23 20 37 32 38 23 20 32 25 7 29 13 20 28 13 21 38% 41% 35% 41% 39% 36% 39% 44% 43% 34% 40% 35% 47% 33% 68% 36% 39% 50% 32%6%+ 26 14 12 13 8 16 13 10 5 10 15 8 2 16 2 5 14 2 7 15% 17% 19% 23% 16% 16% 16% 12% 9% 17% 19% 11% 13% 18% 11% 9% 19% 8% 11%MEAN 4.0 4.5 4.6 5.3 4.4 3.8 4.4 4.0 3.0 3.9 5.0 2.9 3.1 4.2 3.7 3.5 4.5 2.9 3.5 P U B L I C O P I N I O N S T R A T E G I E S
    • WORKPLACE WELLNESS INITIATIVES STUDY / 12430 / SEPTEMBER 2012 PAGE 78Table 26-3QUESTION 19:Approximately what percentage of your organizations operating budget would you say is spent on worksite wellness initiatives that are separate from health insurance coverage?BANNER 3 ------------------- AMONG THOSE WITH WELLNESS INITIATIVE --------------------- HAVE WELLNESS % OF YEARS FINANCIAL EMPLOYEE ACCESS INITATIVE OPERATING BUDGET IN OPERATION INCENTIVE ROI TO INITIATIVE =========== ================= ================= =========== =========== ================== 6% OR 1-2 3-4 5+ TOTAL YES NO 0-1% 2-5% MORE YRS YRS YRS YES NO YES NO 0-74% 75-84% 85%+ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ -----BASE=TOTAL ASKED 168 168 - 78 64 26 52 34 82 92 75 70 94 17 9 139 100% 100% - 46% 38% 15% 31% 20% 49% 55% 45% 42% 56% 10% 5% 83%0%-1% 78 78 - 78 - - 24 16 38 41 37 19 58 4 2 72 46% 46% - 100% - - 46% 47% 46% 45% 49% 27% 62% 24% 22% 52%2-5% 64 64 - - 64 - 22 13 29 36 28 36 27 10 6 47 38% 38% - - 100% - 42% 38% 35% 39% 37% 51% 29% 59% 67% 34%6%+ 26 26 - - - 26 6 5 15 15 10 15 9 3 1 20 15% 15% - - - 100% 12% 15% 18% 16% 13% 21% 10% 18% 11% 14%MEAN 4.0 4.0 - 0.8 3.4 14.8 4.2 3.9 3.9 4.1 3.7 5.2 2.9 6.2 3.4 3.7 P U B L I C O P I N I O N S T R A T E G I E S
    • WORKPLACE WELLNESS INITIATIVES STUDY / 12430 / SEPTEMBER 2012 PAGE 79Table 27-1QUESTION 20:How many years ago was your organizations worksite wellness initiative first created?BANNER 1 ORG HEALTH ORGANIZATION SIZE PROFIT STATUS REGION EMPLOYEES W/ CARE YEARS IN OPERATION GRADE ================= ================= ======================= ================== ======================= =========== NON- 100- PRIV- PUB- PROF/ NORTH MID- 0-10 11-20 21-50 51+ TOTAL 1-99 499 500+ ATE LIC GOVT -EAST SOUTH WEST WEST 0-74% 75-84% 85%+ YRS YRS YRS YRS A/B C/D/F ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----BASE=TOTAL ASKED 206 30 64 112 91 50 65 28 65 75 38 47 42 96 12 22 75 88 114 90 100% 15% 31% 54% 44% 24% 32% 14% 32% 36% 18% 23% 20% 47% 6% 11% 36% 43% 55% 44%1 YEAR 36 4 13 19 19 7 10 6 9 15 6 12 7 11 5 6 13 11 14 22 17% 13% 20% 17% 21% 14% 15% 21% 14% 20% 16% 26% 17% 11% 42% 27% 17% 13% 12% 24%2 YEARS 37 9 11 17 17 6 14 6 15 8 8 8 7 18 4 4 14 12 18 18 18% 30% 17% 15% 19% 12% 22% 21% 23% 11% 21% 17% 17% 19% 33% 18% 19% 14% 16% 20%3 YEARS 23 4 6 13 12 5 6 3 9 6 5 2 9 8 1 - 11 9 12 11 11% 13% 9% 12% 13% 10% 9% 11% 14% 8% 13% 4% 21% 8% 8% - 15% 10% 11% 12%4 YEARS 20 2 4 14 9 4 7 3 7 8 2 1 7 11 - 5 5 10 5 15 10% 7% 6% 13% 10% 8% 11% 11% 11% 11% 5% 2% 17% 11% - 23% 7% 11% 4% 17%5 OR MORE YEARS 90 11 30 49 34 28 28 10 25 38 17 24 12 48 2 7 32 46 65 24 44% 37% 47% 44% 37% 56% 43% 36% 38% 51% 45% 51% 29% 50% 17% 32% 43% 52% 57% 27%MEAN 4.6 4.6 4.9 4.5 4.2 4.5 5.3 4.3 4.0 5.3 4.7 5.1 3.9 4.8 2.2 3.4 4.3 5.7 5.4 3.7 P U B L I C O P I N I O N S T R A T E G I E S
    • WORKPLACE WELLNESS INITIATIVES STUDY / 12430 / SEPTEMBER 2012 PAGE 80Table 27-2QUESTION 20:How many years ago was your organizations worksite wellness initiative first created?BANNER 2 WELLNESS ROLE OF IMPORTANT ISSUES (%10) HEALTH CONCERNS (COMBINED) - BENEFICIAL STATE/LOCAL GOVT ROLE OF FED GOVT ======================== =============================== ================= ================= ================= DECR LACK HIGH NOT INSU- PROD- WORK- OBES- STRESS OF CHRON BLOOD VERY/ MORE LESS NO MORE LESS NO RANCE UCTI- ABSEN- ERS ITY/ /MEN- FIT- DIS- PRE- AT ACT- ACT- CHAN- ACT- ACT- CHAN- TOTAL COSTS VITY TEEISM COMP WEIGHT TAL NESS EASE SSURE VERY SMWT ALL IVE IVE GE IVE IVE GE ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ------ ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----BASE=TOTAL ASKED 206 104 75 66 63 122 104 104 65 74 101 88 16 104 27 68 83 37 78 100% 50% 36% 32% 31% 59% 50% 50% 32% 36% 49% 43% 8% 50% 13% 33% 40% 18% 38%1 YEAR 36 20 14 9 9 21 15 16 12 10 19 13 3 20 2 13 16 3 16 17% 19% 19% 14% 14% 17% 14% 15% 18% 14% 19% 15% 19% 19% 7% 19% 19% 8% 21%2 YEARS 37 22 16 13 12 20 22 21 10 14 26 10 1 18 5 13 16 6 14 18% 21% 21% 20% 19% 16% 21% 20% 15% 19% 26% 11% 6% 17% 19% 19% 19% 16% 18%3 YEARS 23 13 9 10 8 14 14 12 6 9 8 13 2 14 1 7 13 2 5 11% 13% 12% 15% 13% 11% 13% 12% 9% 12% 8% 15% 13% 13% 4% 10% 16% 5% 6%4 YEARS 20 10 6 4 7 18 5 10 7 8 7 9 4 10 7 3 7 9 4 10% 10% 8% 6% 11% 15% 5% 10% 11% 11% 7% 10% 25% 10% 26% 4% 8% 24% 5%5 OR MORE YEARS 90 39 30 30 27 49 48 45 30 33 41 43 6 42 12 32 31 17 39 44% 38% 40% 45% 43% 40% 46% 43% 46% 45% 41% 49% 38% 40% 44% 47% 37% 46% 50%MEAN 4.6 4.4 4.2 5.0 4.5 4.5 4.8 4.7 5.2 4.6 4.4 4.9 5.3 4.4 4.1 5.2 4.4 4.9 4.8 P U B L I C O P I N I O N S T R A T E G I E S
    • WORKPLACE WELLNESS INITIATIVES STUDY / 12430 / SEPTEMBER 2012 PAGE 81Table 27-3QUESTION 20:How many years ago was your organizations worksite wellness initiative first created?BANNER 3 ------------------- AMONG THOSE WITH WELLNESS INITIATIVE --------------------- HAVE WELLNESS % OF YEARS FINANCIAL EMPLOYEE ACCESS INITATIVE OPERATING BUDGET IN OPERATION INCENTIVE ROI TO INITIATIVE =========== ================= ================= =========== =========== ================== 6% OR 1-2 3-4 5+ TOTAL YES NO 0-1% 2-5% MORE YRS YRS YRS YES NO YES NO 0-74% 75-84% 85%+ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ -----BASE=TOTAL ASKED 206 206 - 78 64 26 73 43 90 106 98 85 113 19 11 165 100% 100% - 38% 31% 13% 35% 21% 44% 51% 48% 41% 55% 9% 5% 80%1 YEAR 36 36 - 13 12 4 36 - - 14 21 13 21 7 2 24 17% 17% - 17% 19% 15% 49% - - 13% 21% 15% 19% 37% 18% 15%2 YEARS 37 37 - 11 10 2 37 - - 16 21 18 18 5 - 30 18% 18% - 14% 16% 8% 51% - - 15% 21% 21% 16% 26% - 18%3 YEARS 23 23 - 10 5 4 - 23 - 15 8 11 11 1 1 19 11% 11% - 13% 8% 15% - 53% - 14% 8% 13% 10% 5% 9% 12%4 YEARS 20 20 - 6 8 1 - 20 - 14 6 7 13 1 3 16 10% 10% - 8% 13% 4% - 47% - 13% 6% 8% 12% 5% 27% 10%5 OR MORE YEARS 90 90 - 38 29 15 - - 90 47 42 36 50 5 5 76 44% 44% - 49% 45% 58% - - 100% 44% 43% 42% 44% 26% 45% 46%MEAN 4.6 4.6 - 4.9 5.0 4.8 1.5 3.5 7.7 4.7 4.6 4.4 4.9 4.2 5.6 4.6 P U B L I C O P I N I O N S T R A T E G I E S
    • WORKPLACE WELLNESS INITIATIVES STUDY / 12430 / SEPTEMBER 2012 PAGE 82Table 28-1QUESTION 21:To the best of your knowledge, what are your organizations reasons for offering a worksite wellness initiative? Select all that apply.BANNER 1 ORG HEALTH ORGANIZATION SIZE PROFIT STATUS REGION EMPLOYEES W/ CARE YEARS IN OPERATION GRADE ================= ================= ======================= ================== ======================= =========== NON- 100- PRIV- PUB- PROF/ NORTH MID- 0-10 11-20 21-50 51+ TOTAL 1-99 499 500+ ATE LIC GOVT -EAST SOUTH WEST WEST 0-74% 75-84% 85%+ YRS YRS YRS YRS A/B C/D/F ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----BASE=TOTAL ASKED 222 30 65 127 93 58 71 29 70 81 42 48 42 98 13 22 77 95 125 95 100% 14% 29% 57% 42% 26% 32% 13% 32% 36% 19% 22% 19% 44% 6% 10% 35% 43% 56% 43%TO IMPROVE THE OVERALL 203 28 59 116 81 56 66 26 62 77 38 46 39 90 13 18 70 89 117 85HEALTH OF EMPLOYEES 91% 93% 91% 91% 87% 97% 93% 90% 89% 95% 90% 96% 93% 92% 100% 82% 91% 94% 94% 89%TO REDUCE EMPLOYEE HEALTH 189 19 58 112 74 51 64 26 59 68 36 42 37 84 10 16 66 84 104 84CARE COSTS 85% 63% 89% 88% 80% 88% 90% 90% 84% 84% 86% 88% 88% 86% 77% 73% 86% 88% 83% 88%TO IMPROVE EMPLOYEE 118 15 30 73 43 38 37 21 34 40 23 26 24 55 8 10 42 51 62 55PRODUCTIVITY 53% 50% 46% 57% 46% 66% 52% 72% 49% 49% 55% 54% 57% 56% 62% 45% 55% 54% 50% 58%TO IMPROVE EMPLOYEE MORALE 115 17 37 61 43 29 43 16 35 42 22 24 26 47 10 13 38 48 65 49 52% 57% 57% 48% 46% 50% 61% 55% 50% 52% 52% 50% 62% 48% 77% 59% 49% 51% 52% 52%TO REDUCE EMPLOYEE 109 10 27 72 40 35 34 19 28 37 25 25 19 51 6 9 36 52 58 50ABSENTEEISM 49% 33% 42% 57% 43% 60% 48% 66% 40% 46% 60% 52% 45% 52% 46% 41% 47% 55% 46% 53%TO REDUCE THE COSTS 76 7 17 52 30 24 22 11 25 23 17 16 14 34 2 12 21 35 36 39ASSOCIATED WITH DISABILITY 34% 23% 26% 41% 32% 41% 31% 38% 36% 28% 40% 33% 33% 35% 15% 55% 27% 37% 29% 41%CLAIMSTO ATTRACT AND RECRUIT 57 9 12 36 24 15 18 10 17 18 12 8 18 22 4 6 16 26 41 15EMPLOYEES 26% 30% 18% 28% 26% 26% 25% 34% 24% 22% 29% 17% 43% 22% 31% 27% 21% 27% 33% 16%WAS REQUESTED BY EMPLOYEES 37 5 10 22 6 10 21 4 12 13 8 8 12 10 - 5 12 16 18 18 17% 17% 15% 17% 6% 17% 30% 14% 17% 16% 19% 17% 29% 10% - 23% 16% 17% 14% 19%WORKSITE WELLNESS 36 5 11 20 11 9 16 7 14 10 5 8 2 21 1 1 10 23 23 12INITIATIVES WERE PART OF 16% 17% 17% 16% 12% 16% 23% 24% 20% 12% 12% 17% 5% 21% 8% 5% 13% 24% 18% 13%THE EXISTING HEALTH PLANTO REDUCE EMPLOYEE TURNOVER 35 3 7 25 11 10 14 7 11 10 7 11 10 8 2 5 9 14 21 14RATES 16% 10% 11% 20% 12% 17% 20% 24% 16% 12% 17% 23% 24% 8% 15% 23% 12% 15% 17% 15%SOMETHING ELSE 7 2 1 4 4 1 2 1 - 4 2 2 2 1 - 1 3 3 6 1 3% 7% 2% 3% 4% 2% 3% 3% - 5% 5% 4% 5% 1% - 5% 4% 3% 5% 1% P U B L I C O P I N I O N S T R A T E G I E S
    • WORKPLACE WELLNESS INITIATIVES STUDY / 12430 / SEPTEMBER 2012 PAGE 83Table 28-2QUESTION 21:To the best of your knowledge, what are your organizations reasons for offering a worksite wellness initiative? Select all that apply.BANNER 2 WELLNESS ROLE OF IMPORTANT ISSUES (%10) HEALTH CONCERNS (COMBINED) - BENEFICIAL STATE/LOCAL GOVT ROLE OF FED GOVT ======================== =============================== ================= ================= ================= DECR LACK HIGH NOT INSU- PROD- WORK- OBES- STRESS OF CHRON BLOOD VERY/ MORE LESS NO MORE LESS NO RANCE UCTI- ABSEN- ERS ITY/ /MEN- FIT- DIS- PRE- AT ACT- ACT- CHAN- ACT- ACT- CHAN- TOTAL COSTS VITY TEEISM COMP WEIGHT TAL NESS EASE SSURE VERY SMWT ALL IVE IVE GE IVE IVE GE ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ------ ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----BASE=TOTAL ASKED 222 112 79 70 67 128 118 112 69 78 112 93 16 109 28 75 91 37 82 100% 50% 36% 32% 30% 58% 53% 50% 31% 35% 50% 42% 7% 49% 13% 34% 41% 17% 37%TO IMPROVE THE OVERALL 203 105 73 65 62 116 109 105 65 71 107 84 11 101 24 70 85 33 74HEALTH OF EMPLOYEES 91% 94% 92% 93% 93% 91% 92% 94% 94% 91% 96% 90% 69% 93% 86% 93% 93% 89% 90%TO REDUCE EMPLOYEE HEALTH 189 97 69 61 57 111 101 92 60 68 101 78 9 96 22 63 81 31 67CARE COSTS 85% 87% 87% 87% 85% 87% 86% 82% 87% 87% 90% 84% 56% 88% 79% 84% 89% 84% 82%TO IMPROVE EMPLOYEE 118 69 53 46 43 67 65 61 38 43 66 46 6 64 13 37 56 18 37PRODUCTIVITY 53% 62% 67% 66% 64% 52% 55% 54% 55% 55% 59% 49% 38% 59% 46% 49% 62% 49% 45%TO IMPROVE EMPLOYEE MORALE 115 58 45 43 41 65 68 61 33 35 64 42 8 63 10 37 55 15 39 52% 52% 57% 61% 61% 51% 58% 54% 48% 45% 57% 45% 50% 58% 36% 49% 60% 41% 48%TO REDUCE EMPLOYEE 109 59 47 43 40 66 61 58 31 32 64 41 4 59 14 31 52 17 33ABSENTEEISM 49% 53% 59% 61% 60% 52% 52% 52% 45% 41% 57% 44% 25% 54% 50% 41% 57% 46% 40%TO REDUCE THE COSTS 76 42 31 30 32 47 36 47 22 23 44 29 3 38 8 27 36 9 25ASSOCIATED WITH DISABILITY 34% 38% 39% 43% 48% 37% 31% 42% 32% 29% 39% 31% 19% 35% 29% 36% 40% 24% 30%CLAIMSTO ATTRACT AND RECRUIT 57 25 18 19 13 32 36 35 11 16 37 17 2 29 3 22 30 3 20EMPLOYEES 26% 22% 23% 27% 19% 25% 31% 31% 16% 21% 33% 18% 13% 27% 11% 29% 33% 8% 24%WAS REQUESTED BY EMPLOYEES 37 14 9 7 10 20 18 23 17 16 18 15 4 19 3 13 16 6 14 17% 13% 11% 10% 15% 16% 15% 21% 25% 21% 16% 16% 25% 17% 11% 17% 18% 16% 17%WORKSITE WELLNESS 36 15 13 12 9 25 19 14 11 17 17 15 4 21 7 7 15 8 13INITIATIVES WERE PART OF 16% 13% 16% 17% 13% 20% 16% 13% 16% 22% 15% 16% 25% 19% 25% 9% 16% 22% 16%THE EXISTING HEALTH PLANTO REDUCE EMPLOYEE TURNOVER 35 15 14 16 14 17 20 18 11 9 23 10 1 19 3 10 20 2 9RATES 16% 13% 18% 23% 21% 13% 17% 16% 16% 12% 21% 11% 6% 17% 11% 13% 22% 5% 11%SOMETHING ELSE 7 3 - 2 3 2 7 4 4 1 3 2 2 3 1 3 2 1 4 3% 3% - 3% 4% 2% 6% 4% 6% 1% 3% 2% 13% 3% 4% 4% 2% 3% 5% P U B L I C O P I N I O N S T R A T E G I E S
    • WORKPLACE WELLNESS INITIATIVES STUDY / 12430 / SEPTEMBER 2012 PAGE 84Table 28-3QUESTION 21:To the best of your knowledge, what are your organizations reasons for offering a worksite wellness initiative? Select all that apply.BANNER 3 ------------------- AMONG THOSE WITH WELLNESS INITIATIVE --------------------- HAVE WELLNESS % OF YEARS FINANCIAL EMPLOYEE ACCESS INITATIVE OPERATING BUDGET IN OPERATION INCENTIVE ROI TO INITIATIVE =========== ================= ================= =========== =========== ================== 6% OR 1-2 3-4 5+ TOTAL YES NO 0-1% 2-5% MORE YRS YRS YRS YES NO YES NO 0-74% 75-84% 85%+ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ -----BASE=TOTAL ASKED 222 222 - 78 64 26 73 43 90 110 110 89 124 19 12 172 100% 100% - 35% 29% 12% 33% 19% 41% 50% 50% 40% 56% 9% 5% 77%TO IMPROVE THE OVERALL 203 203 - 72 56 24 68 34 85 103 99 84 112 17 11 158HEALTH OF EMPLOYEES 91% 91% - 92% 88% 92% 93% 79% 94% 94% 90% 94% 90% 89% 92% 92%TO REDUCE EMPLOYEE HEALTH 189 189 - 67 54 22 60 38 77 106 82 84 98 16 10 146CARE COSTS 85% 85% - 86% 84% 85% 82% 88% 86% 96% 75% 94% 79% 84% 83% 85%TO IMPROVE EMPLOYEE 118 118 - 35 39 17 39 27 45 61 57 58 56 12 4 93PRODUCTIVITY 53% 53% - 45% 61% 65% 53% 63% 50% 55% 52% 65% 45% 63% 33% 54%TO IMPROVE EMPLOYEE MORALE 115 115 - 38 33 14 44 20 44 42 72 46 63 9 8 89 52% 52% - 49% 52% 54% 60% 47% 49% 38% 65% 52% 51% 47% 67% 52%TO REDUCE EMPLOYEE 109 109 - 30 37 14 33 24 44 60 49 56 50 11 4 86ABSENTEEISM 49% 49% - 38% 58% 54% 45% 56% 49% 55% 45% 63% 40% 58% 33% 50%TO REDUCE THE COSTS 76 76 - 23 26 9 22 18 30 40 36 38 33 8 3 58ASSOCIATED WITH DISABILITY 34% 34% - 29% 41% 35% 30% 42% 33% 36% 33% 43% 27% 42% 25% 34%CLAIMSTO ATTRACT AND RECRUIT 57 57 - 20 14 9 16 9 25 21 36 26 29 3 4 45EMPLOYEES 26% 26% - 26% 22% 35% 22% 21% 28% 19% 33% 29% 23% 16% 33% 26%WAS REQUESTED BY EMPLOYEES 37 37 - 12 10 3 15 6 15 13 23 11 22 1 2 32 17% 17% - 15% 16% 12% 21% 14% 17% 12% 21% 12% 18% 5% 17% 19%WORKSITE WELLNESS 36 36 - 13 11 6 8 8 18 19 16 15 20 3 2 29INITIATIVES WERE PART OF 16% 16% - 17% 17% 23% 11% 19% 20% 17% 15% 17% 16% 16% 17% 17%THE EXISTING HEALTH PLANTO REDUCE EMPLOYEE TURNOVER 35 35 - 5 11 6 15 4 12 13 22 16 17 3 4 23RATES 16% 16% - 6% 17% 23% 21% 9% 13% 12% 20% 18% 14% 16% 33% 13%SOMETHING ELSE 7 7 - 4 2 - 1 2 4 4 3 3 4 1 1 4 3% 3% - 5% 3% - 1% 5% 4% 4% 3% 3% 3% 5% 8% 2% P U B L I C O P I N I O N S T R A T E G I E S
    • WORKPLACE WELLNESS INITIATIVES STUDY / 12430 / SEPTEMBER 2012 PAGE 85Table 29-1QUESTION 22:Do employees who participate in the worksite wellness initiative receive a financial incentive, such as paying a smaller share of their health insurance premium, having asmaller deductible, or contributing to a Health Savings Account, than employees who do not participate?BANNER 1 ORG HEALTH ORGANIZATION SIZE PROFIT STATUS REGION EMPLOYEES W/ CARE YEARS IN OPERATION GRADE ================= ================= ======================= ================== ======================= =========== NON- 100- PRIV- PUB- PROF/ NORTH MID- 0-10 11-20 21-50 51+ TOTAL 1-99 499 500+ ATE LIC GOVT -EAST SOUTH WEST WEST 0-74% 75-84% 85%+ YRS YRS YRS YRS A/B C/D/F ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----BASE=TOTAL ASKED 221 30 63 128 92 58 71 29 70 80 42 49 42 98 13 22 76 96 125 95 100% 14% 29% 58% 42% 26% 32% 13% 32% 36% 19% 22% 19% 44% 6% 10% 34% 43% 57% 43%**D/S (YES - NO) 1 -8 -5 14 -4 2 3 -3 -16 18 2 17 -2 - -7 -4 - 14 -11 13 - -27% -8% 11% -4% 3% 4% -10% -23% 23% 5% 35% -5% - -54% -18% - 15% -9% 14%YES 111 11 29 71 44 30 37 13 27 49 22 33 20 49 3 9 38 55 57 54 50% 37% 46% 55% 48% 52% 52% 45% 39% 61% 52% 67% 48% 50% 23% 41% 50% 57% 46% 57%NO 110 19 34 57 48 28 34 16 43 31 20 16 22 49 10 13 38 41 68 41 50% 63% 54% 45% 52% 48% 48% 55% 61% 39% 48% 33% 52% 50% 77% 59% 50% 43% 54% 43% P U B L I C O P I N I O N S T R A T E G I E S
    • WORKPLACE WELLNESS INITIATIVES STUDY / 12430 / SEPTEMBER 2012 PAGE 86Table 29-2QUESTION 22:Do employees who participate in the worksite wellness initiative receive a financial incentive, such as paying a smaller share of their health insurance premium, having asmaller deductible, or contributing to a Health Savings Account, than employees who do not participate?BANNER 2 WELLNESS ROLE OF IMPORTANT ISSUES (%10) HEALTH CONCERNS (COMBINED) - BENEFICIAL STATE/LOCAL GOVT ROLE OF FED GOVT ======================== =============================== ================= ================= ================= DECR LACK HIGH NOT INSU- PROD- WORK- OBES- STRESS OF CHRON BLOOD VERY/ MORE LESS NO MORE LESS NO RANCE UCTI- ABSEN- ERS ITY/ /MEN- FIT- DIS- PRE- AT ACT- ACT- CHAN- ACT- ACT- CHAN- TOTAL COSTS VITY TEEISM COMP WEIGHT TAL NESS EASE SSURE VERY SMWT ALL IVE IVE GE IVE IVE GE ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ------ ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----BASE=TOTAL ASKED 221 112 79 69 67 128 118 112 69 79 110 94 16 109 28 76 91 37 82 100% 51% 36% 31% 30% 58% 53% 51% 31% 36% 50% 43% 7% 49% 13% 34% 41% 17% 37%**D/S (YES - NO) 1 8 5 5 5 12 -6 -4 3 17 4 6 -8 9 6 -10 7 7 -10 - 7% 6% 7% 7% 9% -5% -4% 4% 22% 4% 6% -50% 8% 21% -13% 8% 19% -12%YES 111 60 42 37 36 70 56 54 36 48 57 50 4 59 17 33 49 22 36 50% 54% 53% 54% 54% 55% 47% 48% 52% 61% 52% 53% 25% 54% 61% 43% 54% 59% 44%NO 110 52 37 32 31 58 62 58 33 31 53 44 12 50 11 43 42 15 46 50% 46% 47% 46% 46% 45% 53% 52% 48% 39% 48% 47% 75% 46% 39% 57% 46% 41% 56% P U B L I C O P I N I O N S T R A T E G I E S
    • WORKPLACE WELLNESS INITIATIVES STUDY / 12430 / SEPTEMBER 2012 PAGE 87Table 29-3QUESTION 22:Do employees who participate in the worksite wellness initiative receive a financial incentive, such as paying a smaller share of their health insurance premium, having asmaller deductible, or contributing to a Health Savings Account, than employees who do not participate?BANNER 3 ------------------- AMONG THOSE WITH WELLNESS INITIATIVE --------------------- HAVE WELLNESS % OF YEARS FINANCIAL EMPLOYEE ACCESS INITATIVE OPERATING BUDGET IN OPERATION INCENTIVE ROI TO INITIATIVE =========== ================= ================= =========== =========== ================== 6% OR 1-2 3-4 5+ TOTAL YES NO 0-1% 2-5% MORE YRS YRS YRS YES NO YES NO 0-74% 75-84% 85%+ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ -----BASE=TOTAL ASKED 221 221 - 78 64 25 72 43 89 111 110 90 124 19 13 171 100% 100% - 35% 29% 11% 33% 19% 40% 50% 50% 41% 56% 9% 6% 77%**D/S (YES - NO) 1 1 - 4 8 5 -12 15 5 111 -110 34 -30 -7 3 11 - - - 5% 13% 20% -17% 35% 6% 100% -100% 38% -24% -37% 23% 6%YES 111 111 - 41 36 15 30 29 47 111 - 62 47 6 8 91 50% 50% - 53% 56% 60% 42% 67% 53% 100% - 69% 38% 32% 62% 53%NO 110 110 - 37 28 10 42 14 42 - 110 28 77 13 5 80 50% 50% - 47% 44% 40% 58% 33% 47% - 100% 31% 62% 68% 38% 47% P U B L I C O P I N I O N S T R A T E G I E S
    • WORKPLACE WELLNESS INITIATIVES STUDY / 12430 / SEPTEMBER 2012 PAGE 88Table 30-1QUESTION 23:How interested is your organization in expanding or improving your current worksite wellness initiative in the next one to three years?BANNER 1 ORG HEALTH ORGANIZATION SIZE PROFIT STATUS REGION EMPLOYEES W/ CARE YEARS IN OPERATION GRADE ================= ================= ======================= ================== ======================= =========== NON- 100- PRIV- PUB- PROF/ NORTH MID- 0-10 11-20 21-50 51+ TOTAL 1-99 499 500+ ATE LIC GOVT -EAST SOUTH WEST WEST 0-74% 75-84% 85%+ YRS YRS YRS YRS A/B C/D/F ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----BASE=TOTAL ASKED 220 30 64 126 92 57 71 29 70 79 42 49 41 98 13 22 76 96 123 96 100% 14% 29% 57% 42% 26% 32% 13% 32% 36% 19% 22% 19% 45% 6% 10% 35% 44% 56% 44%**D/S (INTERESTED - NOT 152 20 48 84 60 33 59 15 38 65 34 33 35 66 9 14 46 78 75 76 INTERESTED) 69% 67% 75% 67% 65% 58% 83% 52% 54% 82% 81% 67% 85% 67% 69% 64% 61% 81% 61% 79%TOTAL INTERESTED 186 25 56 105 76 45 65 22 54 72 38 41 38 82 11 18 61 87 99 86---------------- 85% 83% 88% 83% 83% 79% 92% 76% 77% 91% 90% 84% 93% 84% 85% 82% 80% 91% 80% 90%TOTAL NOT INTERESTED 34 5 8 21 16 12 6 7 16 7 4 8 3 16 2 4 15 9 24 10-------------------- 15% 17% 13% 17% 17% 21% 8% 24% 23% 9% 10% 16% 7% 16% 15% 18% 20% 9% 20% 10% VERY INTERESTED 86 10 26 50 40 18 28 12 23 30 21 19 19 37 5 8 26 45 39 46 39% 33% 41% 40% 43% 32% 39% 41% 33% 38% 50% 39% 46% 38% 38% 36% 34% 47% 32% 48% SOMEWHAT INTERESTED 100 15 30 55 36 27 37 10 31 42 17 22 19 45 6 10 35 42 60 40 45% 50% 47% 44% 39% 47% 52% 34% 44% 53% 40% 45% 46% 46% 46% 45% 46% 44% 49% 42% NOT VERY INTERESTED 26 2 6 18 12 10 4 5 12 6 3 8 3 10 1 3 12 7 17 9 12% 7% 9% 14% 13% 18% 6% 17% 17% 8% 7% 16% 7% 10% 8% 14% 16% 7% 14% 9% NOT INTERESTED AT ALL 8 3 2 3 4 2 2 2 4 1 1 - - 6 1 1 3 2 7 1 4% 10% 3% 2% 4% 4% 3% 7% 6% 1% 2% - - 6% 8% 5% 4% 2% 6% 1% P U B L I C O P I N I O N S T R A T E G I E S
    • WORKPLACE WELLNESS INITIATIVES STUDY / 12430 / SEPTEMBER 2012 PAGE 89Table 30-2QUESTION 23:How interested is your organization in expanding or improving your current worksite wellness initiative in the next one to three years?BANNER 2 WELLNESS ROLE OF IMPORTANT ISSUES (%10) HEALTH CONCERNS (COMBINED) - BENEFICIAL STATE/LOCAL GOVT ROLE OF FED GOVT ======================== =============================== ================= ================= ================= DECR LACK HIGH NOT INSU- PROD- WORK- OBES- STRESS OF CHRON BLOOD VERY/ MORE LESS NO MORE LESS NO RANCE UCTI- ABSEN- ERS ITY/ /MEN- FIT- DIS- PRE- AT ACT- ACT- CHAN- ACT- ACT- CHAN- TOTAL COSTS VITY TEEISM COMP WEIGHT TAL NESS EASE SSURE VERY SMWT ALL IVE IVE GE IVE IVE GE ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ------ ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----BASE=TOTAL ASKED 220 111 79 69 66 126 117 111 69 78 110 93 16 108 27 76 90 36 82 100% 50% 36% 31% 30% 57% 53% 50% 31% 35% 50% 42% 7% 49% 12% 35% 41% 16% 37%**D/S (INTERESTED - NOT 152 87 55 45 46 100 73 75 51 56 86 65 - 88 13 46 76 22 48 INTERESTED) 69% 78% 70% 65% 70% 79% 62% 68% 74% 72% 78% 70% - 81% 48% 61% 84% 61% 59%TOTAL INTERESTED 186 99 67 57 56 113 95 93 60 67 98 79 8 98 20 61 83 29 65---------------- 85% 89% 85% 83% 85% 90% 81% 84% 87% 86% 89% 85% 50% 91% 74% 80% 92% 81% 79%TOTAL NOT INTERESTED 34 12 12 12 10 13 22 18 9 11 12 14 8 10 7 15 7 7 17-------------------- 15% 11% 15% 17% 15% 10% 19% 16% 13% 14% 11% 15% 50% 9% 26% 20% 8% 19% 21% VERY INTERESTED 86 49 36 34 33 54 40 44 26 31 58 26 1 51 6 26 45 9 30 39% 44% 46% 49% 50% 43% 34% 40% 38% 40% 53% 28% 6% 47% 22% 34% 50% 25% 37% SOMEWHAT INTERESTED 100 50 31 23 23 59 55 49 34 36 40 53 7 47 14 35 38 20 35 45% 45% 39% 33% 35% 47% 47% 44% 49% 46% 36% 57% 44% 44% 52% 46% 42% 56% 43% NOT VERY INTERESTED 26 8 8 9 8 11 16 13 6 9 8 13 5 9 4 11 5 5 13 12% 7% 10% 13% 12% 9% 14% 12% 9% 12% 7% 14% 31% 8% 15% 14% 6% 14% 16% NOT INTERESTED AT ALL 8 4 4 3 2 2 6 5 3 2 4 1 3 1 3 4 2 2 4 4% 4% 5% 4% 3% 2% 5% 5% 4% 3% 4% 1% 19% 1% 11% 5% 2% 6% 5% P U B L I C O P I N I O N S T R A T E G I E S
    • WORKPLACE WELLNESS INITIATIVES STUDY / 12430 / SEPTEMBER 2012 PAGE 90Table 30-3QUESTION 23:How interested is your organization in expanding or improving your current worksite wellness initiative in the next one to three years?BANNER 3 ------------------- AMONG THOSE WITH WELLNESS INITIATIVE --------------------- HAVE WELLNESS % OF YEARS FINANCIAL EMPLOYEE ACCESS INITATIVE OPERATING BUDGET IN OPERATION INCENTIVE ROI TO INITIATIVE =========== ================= ================= =========== =========== ================== 6% OR 1-2 3-4 5+ TOTAL YES NO 0-1% 2-5% MORE YRS YRS YRS YES NO YES NO 0-74% 75-84% 85%+ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ -----BASE=TOTAL ASKED 220 220 - 78 64 25 72 43 88 109 110 89 123 19 13 170 100% 100% - 35% 29% 11% 33% 20% 40% 50% 50% 40% 56% 9% 6% 77%**D/S (INTERESTED - NOT 152 152 - 58 28 23 62 29 54 83 68 67 79 9 11 122 INTERESTED) 69% 69% - 74% 44% 92% 86% 67% 61% 76% 62% 75% 64% 47% 85% 72%TOTAL INTERESTED 186 186 - 68 46 24 67 36 71 96 89 78 101 14 12 146---------------- 85% 85% - 87% 72% 96% 93% 84% 81% 88% 81% 88% 82% 74% 92% 86%TOTAL NOT INTERESTED 34 34 - 10 18 1 5 7 17 13 21 11 22 5 1 24-------------------- 15% 15% - 13% 28% 4% 7% 16% 19% 12% 19% 12% 18% 26% 8% 14% VERY INTERESTED 86 86 - 25 23 14 41 14 26 49 36 46 39 6 8 65 39% 39% - 32% 36% 56% 57% 33% 30% 45% 33% 52% 32% 32% 62% 38% SOMEWHAT INTERESTED 100 100 - 43 23 10 26 22 45 47 53 32 62 8 4 81 45% 45% - 55% 36% 40% 36% 51% 51% 43% 48% 36% 50% 42% 31% 48% NOT VERY INTERESTED 26 26 - 9 12 1 3 7 12 11 15 9 17 3 1 18 12% 12% - 12% 19% 4% 4% 16% 14% 10% 14% 10% 14% 16% 8% 11% NOT INTERESTED AT ALL 8 8 - 1 6 - 2 - 5 2 6 2 5 2 - 6 4% 4% - 1% 9% - 3% - 6% 2% 5% 2% 4% 11% - 4% P U B L I C O P I N I O N S T R A T E G I E S
    • WORKPLACE WELLNESS INITIATIVES STUDY / 12430 / SEPTEMBER 2012 PAGE 91Table 31-1QUESTION 24:How interested is your organization in developing a worksite wellness initiative in the next one to three years?BANNER 1 ORG HEALTH ORGANIZATION SIZE PROFIT STATUS REGION EMPLOYEES W/ CARE YEARS IN OPERATION GRADE ================= ================= ======================= ================== ======================= =========== NON- 100- PRIV- PUB- PROF/ NORTH MID- 0-10 11-20 21-50 51+ TOTAL 1-99 499 500+ ATE LIC GOVT -EAST SOUTH WEST WEST 0-74% 75-84% 85%+ YRS YRS YRS YRS A/B C/D/F ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----BASE=TOTAL ASKED 179 82 58 39 116 17 46 31 58 58 32 58 37 69 32 38 66 39 107 71 100% 46% 32% 22% 65% 9% 26% 17% 32% 32% 18% 32% 21% 39% 18% 21% 37% 22% 60% 40%**D/S (INTERESTED - NOT 69 20 28 21 38 5 26 7 22 28 12 30 17 23 18 10 24 15 35 33 INTERESTED) 39% 24% 48% 54% 33% 29% 57% 23% 38% 48% 38% 52% 46% 33% 56% 26% 36% 38% 33% 46%TOTAL INTERESTED 124 51 43 30 77 11 36 19 40 43 22 44 27 46 25 24 45 27 71 52---------------- 69% 62% 74% 77% 66% 65% 78% 61% 69% 74% 69% 76% 73% 67% 78% 63% 68% 69% 66% 73%TOTAL NOT INTERESTED 55 31 15 9 39 6 10 12 18 15 10 14 10 23 7 14 21 12 36 19-------------------- 31% 38% 26% 23% 34% 35% 22% 39% 31% 26% 31% 24% 27% 33% 22% 37% 32% 31% 34% 27% VERY INTERESTED 48 16 20 12 27 4 17 7 14 16 11 16 13 17 8 10 13 16 25 22 27% 20% 34% 31% 23% 24% 37% 23% 24% 28% 34% 28% 35% 25% 25% 26% 20% 41% 23% 31% SOMEWHAT INTERESTED 76 35 23 18 50 7 19 12 26 27 11 28 14 29 17 14 32 11 46 30 42% 43% 40% 46% 43% 41% 41% 39% 45% 47% 34% 48% 38% 42% 53% 37% 48% 28% 43% 42% NOT VERY INTERESTED 37 16 13 8 25 4 8 8 10 11 8 9 9 16 5 5 16 10 23 14 21% 20% 22% 21% 22% 24% 17% 26% 17% 19% 25% 16% 24% 23% 16% 13% 24% 26% 21% 20% NOT INTERESTED AT ALL 18 15 2 1 14 2 2 4 8 4 2 5 1 7 2 9 5 2 13 5 10% 18% 3% 3% 12% 12% 4% 13% 14% 7% 6% 9% 3% 10% 6% 24% 8% 5% 12% 7% P U B L I C O P I N I O N S T R A T E G I E S
    • WORKPLACE WELLNESS INITIATIVES STUDY / 12430 / SEPTEMBER 2012 PAGE 92Table 31-2QUESTION 24:How interested is your organization in developing a worksite wellness initiative in the next one to three years?BANNER 2 WELLNESS ROLE OF IMPORTANT ISSUES (%10) HEALTH CONCERNS (COMBINED) - BENEFICIAL STATE/LOCAL GOVT ROLE OF FED GOVT ======================== =============================== ================= ================= ================= DECR LACK HIGH NOT INSU- PROD- WORK- OBES- STRESS OF CHRON BLOOD VERY/ MORE LESS NO MORE LESS NO RANCE UCTI- ABSEN- ERS ITY/ /MEN- FIT- DIS- PRE- AT ACT- ACT- CHAN- ACT- ACT- CHAN- TOTAL COSTS VITY TEEISM COMP WEIGHT TAL NESS EASE SSURE VERY SMWT ALL IVE IVE GE IVE IVE GE ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ------ ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----BASE=TOTAL ASKED 179 84 58 50 42 80 85 91 62 55 41 103 34 73 32 71 61 42 73 100% 47% 32% 28% 23% 45% 47% 51% 35% 31% 23% 58% 19% 41% 18% 40% 34% 23% 41%**D/S (INTERESTED - NOT 69 52 34 24 22 32 35 37 22 27 35 47 -14 49 -2 19 41 4 21 INTERESTED) 39% 62% 59% 48% 52% 40% 41% 41% 35% 49% 85% 46% -41% 67% -6% 27% 67% 10% 29%TOTAL INTERESTED 124 68 46 37 32 56 60 64 42 41 38 75 10 61 15 45 51 23 47---------------- 69% 81% 79% 74% 76% 70% 71% 70% 68% 75% 93% 73% 29% 84% 47% 63% 84% 55% 64%TOTAL NOT INTERESTED 55 16 12 13 10 24 25 27 20 14 3 28 24 12 17 26 10 19 26-------------------- 31% 19% 21% 26% 24% 30% 29% 30% 32% 25% 7% 27% 71% 16% 53% 37% 16% 45% 36% VERY INTERESTED 48 30 18 14 13 20 25 30 14 11 20 26 1 29 3 15 22 7 17 27% 36% 31% 28% 31% 25% 29% 33% 23% 20% 49% 25% 3% 40% 9% 21% 36% 17% 23% SOMEWHAT INTERESTED 76 38 28 23 19 36 35 34 28 30 18 49 9 32 12 30 29 16 30 42% 45% 48% 46% 45% 45% 41% 37% 45% 55% 44% 48% 26% 44% 38% 42% 48% 38% 41% NOT VERY INTERESTED 37 10 9 8 8 16 17 18 14 10 2 23 12 10 10 17 7 13 17 21% 12% 16% 16% 19% 20% 20% 20% 23% 18% 5% 22% 35% 14% 31% 24% 11% 31% 23% NOT INTERESTED AT ALL 18 6 3 5 2 8 8 9 6 4 1 5 12 2 7 9 3 6 9 10% 7% 5% 10% 5% 10% 9% 10% 10% 7% 2% 5% 35% 3% 22% 13% 5% 14% 12% P U B L I C O P I N I O N S T R A T E G I E S
    • WORKPLACE WELLNESS INITIATIVES STUDY / 12430 / SEPTEMBER 2012 PAGE 93Table 31-3QUESTION 24:How interested is your organization in developing a worksite wellness initiative in the next one to three years?BANNER 3 ------------------- AMONG THOSE WITH WELLNESS INITIATIVE --------------------- HAVE WELLNESS % OF YEARS FINANCIAL EMPLOYEE ACCESS INITATIVE OPERATING BUDGET IN OPERATION INCENTIVE ROI TO INITIATIVE =========== ================= ================= =========== =========== ================== 6% OR 1-2 3-4 5+ TOTAL YES NO 0-1% 2-5% MORE YRS YRS YRS YES NO YES NO 0-74% 75-84% 85%+ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ -----BASE=TOTAL ASKED 179 - 179 - - - - - - - - - - - - - 100% - 100% - - - - - - - - - - - - -**D/S (INTERESTED - NOT 69 - 69 - - - - - - - - - - - - - INTERESTED) 39% - 39% - - - - - - - - - - - - -TOTAL INTERESTED 124 - 124 - - - - - - - - - - - - ----------------- 69% - 69% - - - - - - - - - - - - -TOTAL NOT INTERESTED 55 - 55 - - - - - - - - - - - - --------------------- 31% - 31% - - - - - - - - - - - - - VERY INTERESTED 48 - 48 - - - - - - - - - - - - - 27% - 27% - - - - - - - - - - - - - SOMEWHAT INTERESTED 76 - 76 - - - - - - - - - - - - - 42% - 42% - - - - - - - - - - - - - NOT VERY INTERESTED 37 - 37 - - - - - - - - - - - - - 21% - 21% - - - - - - - - - - - - - NOT INTERESTED AT ALL 18 - 18 - - - - - - - - - - - - - 10% - 10% - - - - - - - - - - - - - P U B L I C O P I N I O N S T R A T E G I E S
    • WORKPLACE WELLNESS INITIATIVES STUDY / 12430 / SEPTEMBER 2012 PAGE 94Table 32-1QUESTION 25:How beneficial do you think employees find your organizations worksite wellness initiative to be?BANNER 1 ORG HEALTH ORGANIZATION SIZE PROFIT STATUS REGION EMPLOYEES W/ CARE YEARS IN OPERATION GRADE ================= ================= ======================= ================== ======================= =========== NON- 100- PRIV- PUB- PROF/ NORTH MID- 0-10 11-20 21-50 51+ TOTAL 1-99 499 500+ ATE LIC GOVT -EAST SOUTH WEST WEST 0-74% 75-84% 85%+ YRS YRS YRS YRS A/B C/D/F ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----BASE=TOTAL ASKED 222 30 64 128 93 58 71 29 70 81 42 49 42 98 13 22 76 96 125 96 100% 14% 29% 58% 42% 26% 32% 13% 32% 36% 19% 22% 19% 44% 6% 10% 34% 43% 56% 43%**D/S (BENEFICIAL - NOT 178 22 52 104 71 48 59 27 48 65 38 41 34 84 13 18 56 82 101 76 BENEFICIAL) 80% 73% 81% 81% 76% 83% 83% 93% 69% 80% 90% 84% 81% 86% 100% 82% 74% 85% 81% 79%TOTAL BENEFICIAL 200 26 58 116 82 53 65 28 59 73 40 45 38 91 13 20 66 89 113 86---------------- 90% 87% 91% 91% 88% 91% 92% 97% 84% 90% 95% 92% 90% 93% 100% 91% 87% 93% 90% 90%TOTAL NOT BENEFICIAL 22 4 6 12 11 5 6 1 11 8 2 4 4 7 - 2 10 7 12 10-------------------- 10% 13% 9% 9% 12% 9% 8% 3% 16% 10% 5% 8% 10% 7% - 9% 13% 7% 10% 10% VERY BENEFICIAL 33 5 3 25 13 7 13 5 10 14 4 9 2 18 1 2 9 18 21 12 15% 17% 5% 20% 14% 12% 18% 17% 14% 17% 10% 18% 5% 18% 8% 9% 12% 19% 17% 13% SOMEWHAT BENEFICIAL 167 21 55 91 69 46 52 23 49 59 36 36 36 73 12 18 57 71 92 74 75% 70% 86% 71% 74% 79% 73% 79% 70% 73% 86% 73% 86% 74% 92% 82% 75% 74% 74% 77% NOT THAT BENEFICIAL 18 4 4 10 9 4 5 - 8 8 2 3 3 6 - 2 7 6 10 8 8% 13% 6% 8% 10% 7% 7% - 11% 10% 5% 6% 7% 6% - 9% 9% 6% 8% 8% NOT BENEFICIAL AT ALL 4 - 2 2 2 1 1 1 3 - - 1 1 1 - - 3 1 2 2 2% - 3% 2% 2% 2% 1% 3% 4% - - 2% 2% 1% - - 4% 1% 2% 2% P U B L I C O P I N I O N S T R A T E G I E S
    • WORKPLACE WELLNESS INITIATIVES STUDY / 12430 / SEPTEMBER 2012 PAGE 95Table 32-2QUESTION 25:How beneficial do you think employees find your organizations worksite wellness initiative to be?BANNER 2 WELLNESS ROLE OF IMPORTANT ISSUES (%10) HEALTH CONCERNS (COMBINED) - BENEFICIAL STATE/LOCAL GOVT ROLE OF FED GOVT ======================== =============================== ================= ================= ================= DECR LACK HIGH NOT INSU- PROD- WORK- OBES- STRESS OF CHRON BLOOD VERY/ MORE LESS NO MORE LESS NO RANCE UCTI- ABSEN- ERS ITY/ /MEN- FIT- DIS- PRE- AT ACT- ACT- CHAN- ACT- ACT- CHAN- TOTAL COSTS VITY TEEISM COMP WEIGHT TAL NESS EASE SSURE VERY SMWT ALL IVE IVE GE IVE IVE GE ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ------ ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----BASE=TOTAL ASKED 222 112 80 70 67 128 118 112 69 79 111 94 16 109 28 76 91 37 82 100% 50% 36% 32% 30% 58% 53% 50% 31% 36% 50% 42% 7% 49% 13% 34% 41% 17% 37%**D/S (BENEFICIAL - NOT 178 90 70 60 57 108 94 94 49 65 109 70 -2 97 18 58 83 27 60 BENEFICIAL) 80% 80% 88% 86% 85% 84% 80% 84% 71% 82% 98% 74% -13% 89% 64% 76% 91% 73% 73%TOTAL BENEFICIAL 200 101 75 65 62 118 106 103 59 72 110 82 7 103 23 67 87 32 71---------------- 90% 90% 94% 93% 93% 92% 90% 92% 86% 91% 99% 87% 44% 94% 82% 88% 96% 86% 87%TOTAL NOT BENEFICIAL 22 11 5 5 5 10 12 9 10 7 1 12 9 6 5 9 4 5 11-------------------- 10% 10% 6% 7% 7% 8% 10% 8% 14% 9% 1% 13% 56% 6% 18% 12% 4% 14% 13% VERY BENEFICIAL 33 19 15 13 13 20 17 22 8 11 31 2 - 16 3 11 18 3 8 15% 17% 19% 19% 19% 16% 14% 20% 12% 14% 28% 2% - 15% 11% 14% 20% 8% 10% SOMEWHAT BENEFICIAL 167 82 60 52 49 98 89 81 51 61 79 80 7 87 20 56 69 29 63 75% 73% 75% 74% 73% 77% 75% 72% 74% 77% 71% 85% 44% 80% 71% 74% 76% 78% 77% NOT THAT BENEFICIAL 18 9 3 4 4 8 11 8 9 6 1 11 6 5 2 9 3 3 10 8% 8% 4% 6% 6% 6% 9% 7% 13% 8% 1% 12% 38% 5% 7% 12% 3% 8% 12% NOT BENEFICIAL AT ALL 4 2 2 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 - 1 3 1 3 - 1 2 1 2% 2% 3% 1% 1% 2% 1% 1% 1% 1% - 1% 19% 1% 11% - 1% 5% 1% P U B L I C O P I N I O N S T R A T E G I E S
    • WORKPLACE WELLNESS INITIATIVES STUDY / 12430 / SEPTEMBER 2012 PAGE 96Table 32-3QUESTION 25:How beneficial do you think employees find your organizations worksite wellness initiative to be?BANNER 3 ------------------- AMONG THOSE WITH WELLNESS INITIATIVE --------------------- HAVE WELLNESS % OF YEARS FINANCIAL EMPLOYEE ACCESS INITATIVE OPERATING BUDGET IN OPERATION INCENTIVE ROI TO INITIATIVE =========== ================= ================= =========== =========== ================== 6% OR 1-2 3-4 5+ TOTAL YES NO 0-1% 2-5% MORE YRS YRS YRS YES NO YES NO 0-74% 75-84% 85%+ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ -----BASE=TOTAL ASKED 222 222 - 78 64 25 73 43 89 111 110 90 124 19 13 171 100% 100% - 35% 29% 11% 33% 19% 40% 50% 50% 41% 56% 9% 6% 77%**D/S (BENEFICIAL - NOT 178 178 - 62 48 21 59 37 67 93 84 78 94 13 11 143 BENEFICIAL) 80% 80% - 79% 75% 84% 81% 86% 75% 84% 76% 87% 76% 68% 85% 84%TOTAL BENEFICIAL 200 200 - 70 56 23 66 40 78 102 97 84 109 16 12 157---------------- 90% 90% - 90% 88% 92% 90% 93% 88% 92% 88% 93% 88% 84% 92% 92%TOTAL NOT BENEFICIAL 22 22 - 8 8 2 7 3 11 9 13 6 15 3 1 14-------------------- 10% 10% - 10% 13% 8% 10% 7% 12% 8% 12% 7% 12% 16% 8% 8% VERY BENEFICIAL 33 33 - 5 11 7 11 5 15 22 11 19 11 3 2 25 15% 15% - 6% 17% 28% 15% 12% 17% 20% 10% 21% 9% 16% 15% 15% SOMEWHAT BENEFICIAL 167 167 - 65 45 16 55 35 63 80 86 65 98 13 10 132 75% 75% - 83% 70% 64% 75% 81% 71% 72% 78% 72% 79% 68% 77% 77% NOT THAT BENEFICIAL 18 18 - 7 5 2 6 2 9 8 10 5 12 2 1 11 8% 8% - 9% 8% 8% 8% 5% 10% 7% 9% 6% 10% 11% 8% 6% NOT BENEFICIAL AT ALL 4 4 - 1 3 - 1 1 2 1 3 1 3 1 - 3 2% 2% - 1% 5% - 1% 2% 2% 1% 3% 1% 2% 5% - 2% P U B L I C O P I N I O N S T R A T E G I E S
    • WORKPLACE WELLNESS INITIATIVES STUDY / 12430 / SEPTEMBER 2012 PAGE 97Table 33-1QUESTION 26:How beneficial would your employees find a worksite wellness initiative if your organization created one?BANNER 1 ORG HEALTH ORGANIZATION SIZE PROFIT STATUS REGION EMPLOYEES W/ CARE YEARS IN OPERATION GRADE ================= ================= ======================= ================== ======================= =========== NON- 100- PRIV- PUB- PROF/ NORTH MID- 0-10 11-20 21-50 51+ TOTAL 1-99 499 500+ ATE LIC GOVT -EAST SOUTH WEST WEST 0-74% 75-84% 85%+ YRS YRS YRS YRS A/B C/D/F ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----BASE=TOTAL ASKED 178 81 58 39 115 17 46 31 58 57 32 58 37 69 31 38 66 39 106 71 100% 46% 33% 22% 65% 10% 26% 17% 33% 32% 18% 33% 21% 39% 17% 21% 37% 22% 60% 40%**D/S (BENEFICIAL - NOT 116 39 44 33 77 9 30 13 44 43 16 40 27 37 29 24 38 21 64 51 BENEFICIAL) 65% 48% 76% 85% 67% 53% 65% 42% 76% 75% 50% 69% 73% 54% 94% 63% 58% 54% 60% 72%TOTAL BENEFICIAL 147 60 51 36 96 13 38 22 51 50 24 49 32 53 30 31 52 30 85 61---------------- 83% 74% 88% 92% 83% 76% 83% 71% 88% 88% 75% 84% 86% 77% 97% 82% 79% 77% 80% 86%TOTAL NOT BENEFICIAL 31 21 7 3 19 4 8 9 7 7 8 9 5 16 1 7 14 9 21 10-------------------- 17% 26% 12% 8% 17% 24% 17% 29% 12% 12% 25% 16% 14% 23% 3% 18% 21% 23% 20% 14% VERY BENEFICIAL 32 11 16 5 19 1 12 4 9 12 7 9 10 9 7 7 11 7 20 12 18% 14% 28% 13% 17% 6% 26% 13% 16% 21% 22% 16% 27% 13% 23% 18% 17% 18% 19% 17% SOMEWHAT BENEFICIAL 115 49 35 31 77 12 26 18 42 38 17 40 22 44 23 24 41 23 65 49 65% 60% 60% 79% 67% 71% 57% 58% 72% 67% 53% 69% 59% 64% 74% 63% 62% 59% 61% 69% NOT THAT BENEFICIAL 27 18 6 3 18 3 6 6 6 7 8 8 5 14 1 6 13 7 18 9 15% 22% 10% 8% 16% 18% 13% 19% 10% 12% 25% 14% 14% 20% 3% 16% 20% 18% 17% 13% NOT BENEFICIAL AT ALL 4 3 1 - 1 1 2 3 1 - - 1 - 2 - 1 1 2 3 1 2% 4% 2% - 1% 6% 4% 10% 2% - - 2% - 3% - 3% 2% 5% 3% 1% P U B L I C O P I N I O N S T R A T E G I E S
    • WORKPLACE WELLNESS INITIATIVES STUDY / 12430 / SEPTEMBER 2012 PAGE 98Table 33-2QUESTION 26:How beneficial would your employees find a worksite wellness initiative if your organization created one?BANNER 2 WELLNESS ROLE OF IMPORTANT ISSUES (%10) HEALTH CONCERNS (COMBINED) - BENEFICIAL STATE/LOCAL GOVT ROLE OF FED GOVT ======================== =============================== ================= ================= ================= DECR LACK HIGH NOT INSU- PROD- WORK- OBES- STRESS OF CHRON BLOOD VERY/ MORE LESS NO MORE LESS NO RANCE UCTI- ABSEN- ERS ITY/ /MEN- FIT- DIS- PRE- AT ACT- ACT- CHAN- ACT- ACT- CHAN- TOTAL COSTS VITY TEEISM COMP WEIGHT TAL NESS EASE SSURE VERY SMWT ALL IVE IVE GE IVE IVE GE ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ------ ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----BASE=TOTAL ASKED 178 84 58 50 42 80 84 91 62 55 41 102 34 73 32 70 61 42 72 100% 47% 33% 28% 24% 45% 47% 51% 35% 31% 23% 57% 19% 41% 18% 39% 34% 24% 40%**D/S (BENEFICIAL - NOT 116 70 44 38 34 64 52 55 40 41 41 76 -2 59 12 42 45 20 48 BENEFICIAL) 65% 83% 76% 76% 81% 80% 62% 60% 65% 75% 100% 75% -6% 81% 38% 60% 74% 48% 67%TOTAL BENEFICIAL 147 77 51 44 38 72 68 73 51 48 41 89 16 66 22 56 53 31 60---------------- 83% 92% 88% 88% 90% 90% 81% 80% 82% 87% 100% 87% 47% 90% 69% 80% 87% 74% 83%TOTAL NOT BENEFICIAL 31 7 7 6 4 8 16 18 11 7 - 13 18 7 10 14 8 11 12-------------------- 17% 8% 12% 12% 10% 10% 19% 20% 18% 13% - 13% 53% 10% 31% 20% 13% 26% 17% VERY BENEFICIAL 32 23 14 10 10 14 16 19 11 9 15 15 2 15 4 11 13 6 12 18% 27% 24% 20% 24% 18% 19% 21% 18% 16% 37% 15% 6% 21% 13% 16% 21% 14% 17% SOMEWHAT BENEFICIAL 115 54 37 34 28 58 52 54 40 39 26 74 14 51 18 45 40 25 48 65% 64% 64% 68% 67% 73% 62% 59% 65% 71% 63% 73% 41% 70% 56% 64% 66% 60% 67% NOT THAT BENEFICIAL 27 6 7 6 4 6 15 17 9 5 - 11 16 6 8 13 7 9 11 15% 7% 12% 12% 10% 8% 18% 19% 15% 9% - 11% 47% 8% 25% 19% 11% 21% 15% NOT BENEFICIAL AT ALL 4 1 - - - 2 1 1 2 2 - 2 2 1 2 1 1 2 1 2% 1% - - - 3% 1% 1% 3% 4% - 2% 6% 1% 6% 1% 2% 5% 1% P U B L I C O P I N I O N S T R A T E G I E S
    • WORKPLACE WELLNESS INITIATIVES STUDY / 12430 / SEPTEMBER 2012 PAGE 99Table 33-3QUESTION 26:How beneficial would your employees find a worksite wellness initiative if your organization created one?BANNER 3 ------------------- AMONG THOSE WITH WELLNESS INITIATIVE --------------------- HAVE WELLNESS % OF YEARS FINANCIAL EMPLOYEE ACCESS INITATIVE OPERATING BUDGET IN OPERATION INCENTIVE ROI TO INITIATIVE =========== ================= ================= =========== =========== ================== 6% OR 1-2 3-4 5+ TOTAL YES NO 0-1% 2-5% MORE YRS YRS YRS YES NO YES NO 0-74% 75-84% 85%+ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ -----BASE=TOTAL ASKED 178 - 178 - - - - - - - - - - - - - 100% - 100% - - - - - - - - - - - - -**D/S (BENEFICIAL - NOT 116 - 116 - - - - - - - - - - - - - BENEFICIAL) 65% - 65% - - - - - - - - - - - - -TOTAL BENEFICIAL 147 - 147 - - - - - - - - - - - - ----------------- 83% - 83% - - - - - - - - - - - - -TOTAL NOT BENEFICIAL 31 - 31 - - - - - - - - - - - - --------------------- 17% - 17% - - - - - - - - - - - - - VERY BENEFICIAL 32 - 32 - - - - - - - - - - - - - 18% - 18% - - - - - - - - - - - - - SOMEWHAT BENEFICIAL 115 - 115 - - - - - - - - - - - - - 65% - 65% - - - - - - - - - - - - - NOT THAT BENEFICIAL 27 - 27 - - - - - - - - - - - - - 15% - 15% - - - - - - - - - - - - - NOT BENEFICIAL AT ALL 4 - 4 - - - - - - - - - - - - - 2% - 2% - - - - - - - - - - - - - P U B L I C O P I N I O N S T R A T E G I E S
    • WORKPLACE WELLNESS INITIATIVES STUDY / 12430 / SEPTEMBER 2012 PAGE 100Table 34-1QUESTION 27:Based on your experience, over the last year do you think that worksite wellness initiatives were effective in reducing your organizations health care costs?BANNER 1 ORG HEALTH ORGANIZATION SIZE PROFIT STATUS REGION EMPLOYEES W/ CARE YEARS IN OPERATION GRADE ================= ================= ======================= ================== ======================= =========== NON- 100- PRIV- PUB- PROF/ NORTH MID- 0-10 11-20 21-50 51+ TOTAL 1-99 499 500+ ATE LIC GOVT -EAST SOUTH WEST WEST 0-74% 75-84% 85%+ YRS YRS YRS YRS A/B C/D/F ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----BASE=TOTAL ASKED 219 30 63 126 92 58 69 29 70 78 42 48 42 96 13 22 75 95 125 92 100% 14% 29% 58% 42% 26% 32% 13% 32% 36% 19% 22% 19% 44% 6% 10% 34% 43% 57% 42%**D/S (YES - NO) 9 -2 -5 16 6 2 1 9 -2 -4 6 12 -4 - 1 -2 -11 21 19 -10 4% -7% -8% 13% 7% 3% 1% 31% -3% -5% 14% 25% -10% - 8% -9% -15% 22% 15% -11%YES 114 14 29 71 49 30 35 19 34 37 24 30 19 48 7 10 32 58 72 41 52% 47% 46% 56% 53% 52% 51% 66% 49% 47% 57% 63% 45% 50% 54% 45% 43% 61% 58% 45%NO 105 16 34 55 43 28 34 10 36 41 18 18 23 48 6 12 43 37 53 51 48% 53% 54% 44% 47% 48% 49% 34% 51% 53% 43% 38% 55% 50% 46% 55% 57% 39% 42% 55% P U B L I C O P I N I O N S T R A T E G I E S
    • WORKPLACE WELLNESS INITIATIVES STUDY / 12430 / SEPTEMBER 2012 PAGE 101Table 34-2QUESTION 27:Based on your experience, over the last year do you think that worksite wellness initiatives were effective in reducing your organizations health care costs?BANNER 2 WELLNESS ROLE OF IMPORTANT ISSUES (%10) HEALTH CONCERNS (COMBINED) - BENEFICIAL STATE/LOCAL GOVT ROLE OF FED GOVT ======================== =============================== ================= ================= ================= DECR LACK HIGH NOT INSU- PROD- WORK- OBES- STRESS OF CHRON BLOOD VERY/ MORE LESS NO MORE LESS NO RANCE UCTI- ABSEN- ERS ITY/ /MEN- FIT- DIS- PRE- AT ACT- ACT- CHAN- ACT- ACT- CHAN- TOTAL COSTS VITY TEEISM COMP WEIGHT TAL NESS EASE SSURE VERY SMWT ALL IVE IVE GE IVE IVE GE ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ------ ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----BASE=TOTAL ASKED 219 111 77 68 65 127 116 110 67 79 108 94 16 107 28 75 89 37 82 100% 51% 35% 31% 30% 58% 53% 50% 31% 36% 49% 43% 7% 49% 13% 34% 41% 17% 37%**D/S (YES - NO) 9 3 11 18 11 5 8 4 1 3 32 -16 -8 3 - 3 5 -3 4 4% 3% 14% 26% 17% 4% 7% 4% 1% 4% 30% -17% -50% 3% - 4% 6% -8% 5%YES 114 57 44 43 38 66 62 57 34 41 70 39 4 55 14 39 47 17 43 52% 51% 57% 63% 58% 52% 53% 52% 51% 52% 65% 41% 25% 51% 50% 52% 53% 46% 52%NO 105 54 33 25 27 61 54 53 33 38 38 55 12 52 14 36 42 20 39 48% 49% 43% 37% 42% 48% 47% 48% 49% 48% 35% 59% 75% 49% 50% 48% 47% 54% 48% P U B L I C O P I N I O N S T R A T E G I E S
    • WORKPLACE WELLNESS INITIATIVES STUDY / 12430 / SEPTEMBER 2012 PAGE 102Table 34-3QUESTION 27:Based on your experience, over the last year do you think that worksite wellness initiatives were effective in reducing your organizations health care costs?BANNER 3 ------------------- AMONG THOSE WITH WELLNESS INITIATIVE --------------------- HAVE WELLNESS % OF YEARS FINANCIAL EMPLOYEE ACCESS INITATIVE OPERATING BUDGET IN OPERATION INCENTIVE ROI TO INITIATIVE =========== ================= ================= =========== =========== ================== 6% OR 1-2 3-4 5+ TOTAL YES NO 0-1% 2-5% MORE YRS YRS YRS YES NO YES NO 0-74% 75-84% 85%+ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ -----BASE=TOTAL ASKED 219 219 - 76 63 26 70 43 89 109 109 89 123 19 13 169 100% 100% - 35% 29% 12% 32% 20% 41% 50% 50% 41% 56% 9% 6% 77%**D/S (YES - NO) 9 9 - -12 5 8 -10 -1 9 29 -21 29 -21 1 5 1 4% 4% - -16% 8% 31% -14% -2% 10% 27% -19% 33% -17% 5% 38% 1%YES 114 114 - 32 34 17 30 21 49 69 44 59 51 10 9 85 52% 52% - 42% 54% 65% 43% 49% 55% 63% 40% 66% 41% 53% 69% 50%NO 105 105 - 44 29 9 40 22 40 40 65 30 72 9 4 84 48% 48% - 58% 46% 35% 57% 51% 45% 37% 60% 34% 59% 47% 31% 50% P U B L I C O P I N I O N S T R A T E G I E S
    • WORKPLACE WELLNESS INITIATIVES STUDY / 12430 / SEPTEMBER 2012 PAGE 103Table 35-1QUESTION 28:Based on your experience, do you think that worksite wellness initiatives are effective in reducing worker absenteeism at your organization?BANNER 1 ORG HEALTH ORGANIZATION SIZE PROFIT STATUS REGION EMPLOYEES W/ CARE YEARS IN OPERATION GRADE ================= ================= ======================= ================== ======================= =========== NON- 100- PRIV- PUB- PROF/ NORTH MID- 0-10 11-20 21-50 51+ TOTAL 1-99 499 500+ ATE LIC GOVT -EAST SOUTH WEST WEST 0-74% 75-84% 85%+ YRS YRS YRS YRS A/B C/D/F ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----BASE=TOTAL ASKED 218 30 62 126 92 57 69 29 69 78 42 48 42 95 13 21 74 96 125 91 100% 14% 28% 58% 42% 26% 32% 13% 32% 36% 19% 22% 19% 44% 6% 10% 34% 44% 57% 42%**D/S (YES - NO) -16 -2 -12 -2 - -5 -11 7 -1 -14 -8 2 -12 -9 3 -1 -6 -12 1 -19 -7% -7% -19% -2% - -9% -16% 24% -1% -18% -19% 4% -29% -9% 23% -5% -8% -13% 1% -21%YES 101 14 25 62 46 26 29 18 34 32 17 25 15 43 8 10 34 42 63 36 46% 47% 40% 49% 50% 46% 42% 62% 49% 41% 40% 52% 36% 45% 62% 48% 46% 44% 50% 40%NO 117 16 37 64 46 31 40 11 35 46 25 23 27 52 5 11 40 54 62 55 54% 53% 60% 51% 50% 54% 58% 38% 51% 59% 60% 48% 64% 55% 38% 52% 54% 56% 50% 60% P U B L I C O P I N I O N S T R A T E G I E S
    • WORKPLACE WELLNESS INITIATIVES STUDY / 12430 / SEPTEMBER 2012 PAGE 104Table 35-2QUESTION 28:Based on your experience, do you think that worksite wellness initiatives are effective in reducing worker absenteeism at your organization?BANNER 2 WELLNESS ROLE OF IMPORTANT ISSUES (%10) HEALTH CONCERNS (COMBINED) - BENEFICIAL STATE/LOCAL GOVT ROLE OF FED GOVT ======================== =============================== ================= ================= ================= DECR LACK HIGH NOT INSU- PROD- WORK- OBES- STRESS OF CHRON BLOOD VERY/ MORE LESS NO MORE LESS NO RANCE UCTI- ABSEN- ERS ITY/ /MEN- FIT- DIS- PRE- AT ACT- ACT- CHAN- ACT- ACT- CHAN- TOTAL COSTS VITY TEEISM COMP WEIGHT TAL NESS EASE SSURE VERY SMWT ALL IVE IVE GE IVE IVE GE ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ------ ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----BASE=TOTAL ASKED 218 112 78 68 66 126 116 110 67 79 109 92 16 105 28 76 88 37 82 100% 51% 36% 31% 30% 58% 53% 50% 31% 36% 50% 42% 7% 48% 13% 35% 40% 17% 38%**D/S (YES - NO) -16 4 6 8 10 -10 4 2 -5 -23 25 -30 -10 -9 -4 -8 -8 -11 - -7% 4% 8% 12% 15% -8% 3% 2% -7% -29% 23% -33% -63% -9% -14% -11% -9% -30% -YES 101 58 42 38 38 58 60 56 31 28 67 31 3 48 12 34 40 13 41 46% 52% 54% 56% 58% 46% 52% 51% 46% 35% 61% 34% 19% 46% 43% 45% 45% 35% 50%NO 117 54 36 30 28 68 56 54 36 51 42 61 13 57 16 42 48 24 41 54% 48% 46% 44% 42% 54% 48% 49% 54% 65% 39% 66% 81% 54% 57% 55% 55% 65% 50% P U B L I C O P I N I O N S T R A T E G I E S
    • WORKPLACE WELLNESS INITIATIVES STUDY / 12430 / SEPTEMBER 2012 PAGE 105Table 35-3QUESTION 28:Based on your experience, do you think that worksite wellness initiatives are effective in reducing worker absenteeism at your organization?BANNER 3 ------------------- AMONG THOSE WITH WELLNESS INITIATIVE --------------------- HAVE WELLNESS % OF YEARS FINANCIAL EMPLOYEE ACCESS INITATIVE OPERATING BUDGET IN OPERATION INCENTIVE ROI TO INITIATIVE =========== ================= ================= =========== =========== ================== 6% OR 1-2 3-4 5+ TOTAL YES NO 0-1% 2-5% MORE YRS YRS YRS YES NO YES NO 0-74% 75-84% 85%+ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ -----BASE=TOTAL ASKED 218 218 - 76 63 26 69 43 89 109 108 89 122 19 13 168 100% 100% - 35% 29% 12% 32% 20% 41% 50% 50% 41% 56% 9% 6% 77%**D/S (YES - NO) -16 -16 - -20 -1 4 -17 -11 5 -13 -4 1 -22 -3 -1 -18 -7% -7% - -26% -2% 15% -25% -26% 6% -12% -4% 1% -18% -16% -8% -11%YES 101 101 - 28 31 15 26 16 47 48 52 45 50 8 6 75 46% 46% - 37% 49% 58% 38% 37% 53% 44% 48% 51% 41% 42% 46% 45%NO 117 117 - 48 32 11 43 27 42 61 56 44 72 11 7 93 54% 54% - 63% 51% 42% 62% 63% 47% 56% 52% 49% 59% 58% 54% 55% P U B L I C O P I N I O N S T R A T E G I E S
    • WORKPLACE WELLNESS INITIATIVES STUDY / 12430 / SEPTEMBER 2012 PAGE 106Table 36-1QUESTION 29:Based on your experience, do you think that worksite wellness initiatives are effective in improving worker productivity at your organization?BANNER 1 ORG HEALTH ORGANIZATION SIZE PROFIT STATUS REGION EMPLOYEES W/ CARE YEARS IN OPERATION GRADE ================= ================= ======================= ================== ======================= =========== NON- 100- PRIV- PUB- PROF/ NORTH MID- 0-10 11-20 21-50 51+ TOTAL 1-99 499 500+ ATE LIC GOVT -EAST SOUTH WEST WEST 0-74% 75-84% 85%+ YRS YRS YRS YRS A/B C/D/F ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----BASE=TOTAL ASKED 219 29 63 127 92 58 69 29 69 79 42 49 42 95 13 21 75 96 125 92 100% 13% 29% 58% 42% 26% 32% 13% 32% 36% 19% 22% 19% 43% 6% 10% 34% 44% 57% 42%**D/S (YES - NO) 11 1 1 9 - 4 7 9 7 -3 -2 3 -4 7 -1 -7 11 8 15 -6 5% 3% 2% 7% - 7% 10% 31% 10% -4% -5% 6% -10% 7% -8% -33% 15% 8% 12% -7%YES 115 15 32 68 46 31 38 19 38 38 20 26 19 51 6 7 43 52 70 43 53% 52% 51% 54% 50% 53% 55% 66% 55% 48% 48% 53% 45% 54% 46% 33% 57% 54% 56% 47%NO 104 14 31 59 46 27 31 10 31 41 22 23 23 44 7 14 32 44 55 49 47% 48% 49% 46% 50% 47% 45% 34% 45% 52% 52% 47% 55% 46% 54% 67% 43% 46% 44% 53% P U B L I C O P I N I O N S T R A T E G I E S
    • WORKPLACE WELLNESS INITIATIVES STUDY / 12430 / SEPTEMBER 2012 PAGE 107Table 36-2QUESTION 29:Based on your experience, do you think that worksite wellness initiatives are effective in improving worker productivity at your organization?BANNER 2 WELLNESS ROLE OF IMPORTANT ISSUES (%10) HEALTH CONCERNS (COMBINED) - BENEFICIAL STATE/LOCAL GOVT ROLE OF FED GOVT ======================== =============================== ================= ================= ================= DECR LACK HIGH NOT INSU- PROD- WORK- OBES- STRESS OF CHRON BLOOD VERY/ MORE LESS NO MORE LESS NO RANCE UCTI- ABSEN- ERS ITY/ /MEN- FIT- DIS- PRE- AT ACT- ACT- CHAN- ACT- ACT- CHAN- TOTAL COSTS VITY TEEISM COMP WEIGHT TAL NESS EASE SSURE VERY SMWT ALL IVE IVE GE IVE IVE GE ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ------ ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----BASE=TOTAL ASKED 219 111 78 68 65 127 116 110 67 78 110 93 15 106 28 76 88 37 83 100% 51% 36% 31% 30% 58% 53% 50% 31% 36% 50% 42% 7% 48% 13% 35% 40% 17% 38%**D/S (YES - NO) 11 17 16 22 17 5 10 16 -1 -10 40 -21 -7 4 -2 2 14 -9 -1 5% 15% 21% 32% 26% 4% 9% 15% -1% -13% 36% -23% -47% 4% -7% 3% 16% -24% -1%YES 115 64 47 45 41 66 63 63 33 34 75 36 4 55 13 39 51 14 41 53% 58% 60% 66% 63% 52% 54% 57% 49% 44% 68% 39% 27% 52% 46% 51% 58% 38% 49%NO 104 47 31 23 24 61 53 47 34 44 35 57 11 51 15 37 37 23 42 47% 42% 40% 34% 37% 48% 46% 43% 51% 56% 32% 61% 73% 48% 54% 49% 42% 62% 51% P U B L I C O P I N I O N S T R A T E G I E S
    • WORKPLACE WELLNESS INITIATIVES STUDY / 12430 / SEPTEMBER 2012 PAGE 108Table 36-3QUESTION 29:Based on your experience, do you think that worksite wellness initiatives are effective in improving worker productivity at your organization?BANNER 3 ------------------- AMONG THOSE WITH WELLNESS INITIATIVE --------------------- HAVE WELLNESS % OF YEARS FINANCIAL EMPLOYEE ACCESS INITATIVE OPERATING BUDGET IN OPERATION INCENTIVE ROI TO INITIATIVE =========== ================= ================= =========== =========== ================== 6% OR 1-2 3-4 5+ TOTAL YES NO 0-1% 2-5% MORE YRS YRS YRS YES NO YES NO 0-74% 75-84% 85%+ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ -----BASE=TOTAL ASKED 219 219 - 77 63 25 70 42 90 109 108 89 122 19 13 169 100% 100% - 35% 29% 11% 32% 19% 41% 50% 49% 41% 56% 9% 6% 77%**D/S (YES - NO) 11 11 - -17 7 13 - - 2 -7 16 15 -10 1 -3 7 5% 5% - -22% 11% 52% - - 2% -6% 15% 17% -8% 5% -23% 4%YES 115 115 - 30 35 19 35 21 46 51 62 52 56 10 5 88 53% 53% - 39% 56% 76% 50% 50% 51% 47% 57% 58% 46% 53% 38% 52%NO 104 104 - 47 28 6 35 21 44 58 46 37 66 9 8 81 47% 47% - 61% 44% 24% 50% 50% 49% 53% 43% 42% 54% 47% 62% 48% P U B L I C O P I N I O N S T R A T E G I E S
    • WORKPLACE WELLNESS INITIATIVES STUDY / 12430 / SEPTEMBER 2012 PAGE 109Table 37-1Summary of Creating/Expanding Initiative Statements: % Strongly AgreeBANNER 1 ORG HEALTH ORGANIZATION SIZE PROFIT STATUS REGION EMPLOYEES W/ CARE YEARS IN OPERATION GRADE ================= ================= ======================= ================== ======================= =========== NON- 100- PRIV- PUB- PROF/ NORTH MID- 0-10 11-20 21-50 51+ TOTAL 1-99 499 500+ ATE LIC GOVT -EAST SOUTH WEST WEST 0-74% 75-84% 85%+ YRS YRS YRS YRS A/B C/D/F ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----BASE=TOTAL ASKED 406 113 124 169 212 77 117 61 129 140 76 108 79 169 46 61 144 135 234 169 100% 28% 31% 42% 52% 19% 29% 15% 32% 34% 19% 27% 19% 42% 11% 15% 35% 33% 58% 42%HEALTH PLANS OFFERED 227 57 75 95 114 40 73 35 66 82 44 59 46 98 25 33 78 84 123 102 PREMIUM DISCOUNTS OR 56% 51% 61% 57% 55% 52% 63% 57% 52% 59% 58% 55% 58% 58% 54% 55% 55% 62% 53% 61% REBATES FOR THESE (1) (1) (1) (2) (1) *(1) (1) (2) (1) (1) (1) (1) (2) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) INITIATIVES.WE COULD DEMONSTRATE A 218 47 72 99 107 40 71 37 63 78 40 58 47 89 24 30 76 79 115 100 FINANCIAL RETURN ON 54% 42% 58% 59% 51% 52% 62% 61% 50% 56% 53% 54% 59% 53% 52% 50% 53% 59% 50% 60% INVESTMENT FOR THESE (2) (2) (2) (1) (2) *(1) (2) (1) (2) (2) (2) (2) (1) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) INITIATIVES.THE STATE AND FEDERAL 176 40 55 81 90 35 51 30 50 63 33 48 36 74 22 25 65 58 95 81 GOVERNMENT PROVIDED TAX 44% 36% 45% 49% 44% 46% 44% 49% 40% 46% 44% 45% 46% 44% 48% 42% 46% 43% 41% 49% INCENTIVES FOR THESE (3) (4) (3) (3) (4) (3) (3) *(3) (3) (3) (3) (3) (3) (3) (3) (3) (3) (3) (3) (3) INITIATIVES.IT WOULD HELP ATTRACT AND 158 39 47 72 91 24 43 30 50 48 30 46 33 61 21 25 49 56 86 72 RETAIN TALENTED 40% 35% 39% 43% 44% 31% 37% 49% 39% 35% 41% 43% 42% 37% 46% 42% 34% 42% 37% 43% EMPLOYEES. (4) (5) (4) (4) (3) (5) (4) *(3) (4) (5) (4) (4) (4) (4) (4) (4) (4) (4) (4) (4)MY EMPLOYEES ACTIVELY 138 41 37 60 74 25 39 21 34 56 27 38 32 56 16 22 43 50 80 58 REQUESTED SUCH AN 35% 37% 30% 36% 35% 33% 34% 34% 27% 41% 36% 35% 41% 34% 35% 37% 30% 37% 35% 35% INITIATIVE. (5) (3) (5) (5) (5) (4) (5) (5) (5) (4) (5) (5) (5) (5) (5) (5) (5) (5) (5) (5)THERE WAS A COMMUNITY 86 20 21 45 47 14 25 13 25 29 19 23 14 37 12 13 23 35 49 37 INITIATIVE THAT 22% 18% 18% 27% 23% 18% 22% 22% 20% 21% 25% 21% 18% 22% 26% 22% 16% 26% 21% 22% RECOGNIZED EMPLOYERS WITH (6) (6) (6) (6) (6) (6) (6) (6) (6) (6) (6) (6) (6) (6) (6) (6) (6) (6) (6) (6) HEALTHY WORKPLACES. P U B L I C O P I N I O N S T R A T E G I E S
    • WORKPLACE WELLNESS INITIATIVES STUDY / 12430 / SEPTEMBER 2012 PAGE 110Table 37-2Summary of Creating/Expanding Initiative Statements: % Strongly AgreeBANNER 2 WELLNESS ROLE OF IMPORTANT ISSUES (%10) HEALTH CONCERNS (COMBINED) - BENEFICIAL STATE/LOCAL GOVT ROLE OF FED GOVT ======================== =============================== ================= ================= ================= DECR LACK HIGH NOT INSU- PROD- WORK- OBES- STRESS OF CHRON BLOOD VERY/ MORE LESS NO MORE LESS NO RANCE UCTI- ABSEN- ERS ITY/ /MEN- FIT- DIS- PRE- AT ACT- ACT- CHAN- ACT- ACT- CHAN- TOTAL COSTS VITY TEEISM COMP WEIGHT TAL NESS EASE SSURE VERY SMWT ALL IVE IVE GE IVE IVE GE ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ------ ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----BASE=TOTAL ASKED 406 197 140 120 110 211 207 205 133 136 154 199 51 184 60 148 152 79 157 100% 49% 34% 30% 27% 52% 51% 50% 33% 33% 38% 49% 13% 45% 15% 36% 37% 19% 39%HEALTH PLANS OFFERED 227 117 84 70 69 122 117 115 77 83 99 107 20 119 25 80 91 37 93 PREMIUM DISCOUNTS OR 56% 60% 61% 59% 63% 59% 57% 57% 59% 61% 65% 54% 40% 65% 42% 54% 60% 47% 60% REBATES FOR THESE (1) (2) (1) (1) (1) (1) (2) (1) (1) (1) (1) (2) (1) (1) (2) (1) (2) (2) (1) INITIATIVES.WE COULD DEMONSTRATE A 218 118 83 64 66 120 116 103 75 80 94 107 17 111 27 74 93 39 79 FINANCIAL RETURN ON 54% 61% 60% 54% 61% 58% 57% 51% 57% 60% 61% 54% 34% 61% 45% 50% 62% 49% 50% INVESTMENT FOR THESE (2) (1) (2) (2) (2) (2) (1) (2) (2) (2) (2) (1) (3) (2) (1) (2) (1) (1) (2) INITIATIVES.THE STATE AND FEDERAL 176 96 75 61 57 99 91 88 53 62 78 84 13 108 15 51 89 24 58 GOVERNMENT PROVIDED TAX 44% 50% 56% 52% 53% 48% 45% 44% 40% 47% 53% 42% 27% 60% 26% 34% 60% 31% 37% INCENTIVES FOR THESE (3) (3) (3) (3) (3) (3) (3) (3) (3) (3) (3) (3) (5) (3) (5) (5) (3) (4) (4) INITIATIVES.IT WOULD HELP ATTRACT AND 158 85 66 50 47 89 84 84 49 57 76 68 14 83 17 57 69 24 63 RETAIN TALENTED 40% 44% 48% 42% 43% 43% 41% 41% 37% 43% 50% 34% 29% 45% 28% 39% 46% 30% 40% EMPLOYEES. (4) (4) (4) (4) (4) (4) (4) (4) (4) (4) (4) (4) (4) (4) (4) (3) (4) (5) (3)MY EMPLOYEES ACTIVELY 138 71 53 43 42 73 78 70 47 42 56 63 19 62 21 52 51 31 54 REQUESTED SUCH AN 35% 37% 39% 36% 39% 35% 38% 34% 36% 32% 37% 32% 37% 34% 35% 36% 34% 39% 35% INITIATIVE. (5) (5) (5) (5) (5) (5) (5) (5) (5) (5) (5) (5) (2) (5) (3) (4) (5) (3) (5)THERE WAS A COMMUNITY 86 49 38 31 35 50 49 41 21 36 44 34 8 49 9 28 39 11 35 INITIATIVE THAT 22% 25% 28% 26% 32% 24% 24% 20% 16% 27% 29% 17% 16% 27% 15% 19% 26% 14% 23% RECOGNIZED EMPLOYERS WITH (6) (6) (6) (6) (6) (6) (6) (6) (6) (6) (6) (6) (6) (6) (6) (6) (6) (6) (6) HEALTHY WORKPLACES. P U B L I C O P I N I O N S T R A T E G I E S
    • WORKPLACE WELLNESS INITIATIVES STUDY / 12430 / SEPTEMBER 2012 PAGE 111Table 37-3Summary of Creating/Expanding Initiative Statements: % Strongly AgreeBANNER 3 ------------------- AMONG THOSE WITH WELLNESS INITIATIVE --------------------- HAVE WELLNESS % OF YEARS FINANCIAL EMPLOYEE ACCESS INITATIVE OPERATING BUDGET IN OPERATION INCENTIVE ROI TO INITIATIVE =========== ================= ================= =========== =========== ================== 6% OR 1-2 3-4 5+ TOTAL YES NO 0-1% 2-5% MORE YRS YRS YRS YES NO YES NO 0-74% 75-84% 85%+ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ -----BASE=TOTAL ASKED 406 224 182 78 64 26 73 43 90 111 110 90 124 19 13 172 100% 55% 45% 35% 29% 12% 33% 19% 40% 50% 49% 40% 55% 8% 6% 77%HEALTH PLANS OFFERED 227 128 99 48 34 15 43 27 49 76 51 58 67 9 9 99 PREMIUM DISCOUNTS OR 56% 58% 55% 62% 54% 60% 61% 63% 55% 68% 47% 64% 55% 50% 69% 58% REBATES FOR THESE (1) (1) (1) (2) (1) (2) (1) (2) (1) (1) (2) (1) (1) (3) (1) (1) INITIATIVES.WE COULD DEMONSTRATE A 218 127 91 51 31 17 41 27 49 71 54 54 67 11 8 97 FINANCIAL RETURN ON 54% 57% 50% 65% 49% 65% 57% 64% 54% 65% 50% 61% 54% 58% 62% 57% INVESTMENT FOR THESE (2) (2) (2) (1) (2) (1) (2) (1) (2) (2) (1) (2) (2) *(1) (2) (2) INITIATIVES.THE STATE AND FEDERAL 176 99 77 38 23 14 33 25 33 56 43 45 51 9 7 75 GOVERNMENT PROVIDED TAX 44% 45% 43% 49% 36% 56% 47% 58% 37% 50% 40% 50% 42% 47% 54% 44% INCENTIVES FOR THESE (3) (3) (3) (3) (4) (3) (4) (3) (3) (3) (3) (3) (3) (4) (3) (3) INITIATIVES.IT WOULD HELP ATTRACT AND 158 93 65 34 25 13 34 19 31 51 42 44 46 11 6 70 RETAIN TALENTED 40% 42% 36% 44% 39% 52% 48% 44% 35% 46% 39% 49% 37% 58% 46% 41% EMPLOYEES. (4) (4) (5) (4) (3) *(4) (3) (4) (4) (4) (4) (4) (4) *(1) (4) (4)MY EMPLOYEES ACTIVELY 138 72 66 28 21 9 25 17 23 42 29 34 35 5 5 56 REQUESTED SUCH AN 35% 33% 37% 36% 33% 36% 35% 40% 26% 38% 27% 38% 29% 26% 38% 33% INITIATIVE. (5) (5) (4) (5) (5) (6) (5) (5) (5) (5) (5) (5) (5) (6) (5) (5)THERE WAS A COMMUNITY 86 57 29 16 13 13 21 8 22 30 27 30 24 7 2 44 INITIATIVE THAT 22% 26% 16% 21% 20% 52% 30% 19% 25% 27% 25% 33% 20% 37% 15% 26% RECOGNIZED EMPLOYERS WITH (6) (6) (6) (6) (6) *(4) (6) (6) (6) (6) (6) (6) (6) (5) (6) (6) HEALTHY WORKPLACES. P U B L I C O P I N I O N S T R A T E G I E S
    • WORKPLACE WELLNESS INITIATIVES STUDY / 12430 / SEPTEMBER 2012 PAGE 112Table 38-1Summary of Creating/Expanding Initiative Statements: % Total AgreeBANNER 1 ORG HEALTH ORGANIZATION SIZE PROFIT STATUS REGION EMPLOYEES W/ CARE YEARS IN OPERATION GRADE ================= ================= ======================= ================== ======================= =========== NON- 100- PRIV- PUB- PROF/ NORTH MID- 0-10 11-20 21-50 51+ TOTAL 1-99 499 500+ ATE LIC GOVT -EAST SOUTH WEST WEST 0-74% 75-84% 85%+ YRS YRS YRS YRS A/B C/D/F ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----BASE=TOTAL ASKED 406 113 124 169 212 77 117 61 129 140 76 108 79 169 46 61 144 135 234 169 100% 28% 31% 42% 52% 19% 29% 15% 32% 34% 19% 27% 19% 42% 11% 15% 35% 33% 58% 42%HEALTH PLANS OFFERED 368 97 112 159 191 70 107 58 117 129 64 101 71 153 39 54 130 128 210 156 PREMIUM DISCOUNTS OR 92% 87% 91% 95% 91% 91% 92% 95% 93% 93% 84% 94% 90% 91% 85% 90% 92% 95% 90% 93% REBATES FOR THESE (1) (1) (1) *(1) (1) (2) (2) (1) (2) (1) (2) (2) (2) (1) *(2) (2) (2) (1) (2) (1) INITIATIVES.WE COULD DEMONSTRATE A 366 95 112 159 186 73 107 57 118 127 64 102 74 152 38 56 132 125 212 151 FINANCIAL RETURN ON 91% 86% 90% 95% 89% 95% 93% 93% 93% 91% 85% 94% 94% 91% 83% 93% 92% 93% 91% 90% INVESTMENT FOR THESE (2) (2) (2) *(1) (2) (1) (1) (2) (1) (2) (1) (1) (1) (2) (4) (1) (1) (2) (1) (2) INITIATIVES.IT WOULD HELP ATTRACT AND 336 88 100 148 176 65 95 51 102 121 62 89 67 139 41 50 117 114 201 133 RETAIN TALENTED 84% 80% 82% 88% 85% 84% 82% 84% 80% 88% 84% 82% 85% 84% 89% 83% 82% 85% 87% 80% EMPLOYEES. (3) (3) (4) (3) (3) (4) (4) (3) (4) (3) (3) (3) (3) (4) (1) (3) (3) (3) (3) (3)THE STATE AND FEDERAL 319 82 100 137 164 68 87 48 102 113 56 84 56 142 39 48 115 105 187 130 GOVERNMENT PROVIDED TAX 80% 75% 83% 83% 80% 89% 76% 79% 82% 82% 75% 79% 71% 85% 85% 81% 82% 78% 82% 78% INCENTIVES FOR THESE (4) (4) (3) (4) (4) (3) (5) (4) (3) (4) (4) (4) (5) (3) *(2) (4) (4) *(4) (4) (4) INITIATIVES.MY EMPLOYEES ACTIVELY 296 73 92 131 143 58 95 44 88 112 52 85 62 117 31 40 105 105 169 125 REQUESTED SUCH AN 74% 66% 75% 78% 68% 76% 83% 72% 70% 81% 69% 79% 79% 70% 67% 68% 74% 78% 73% 74% INITIATIVE. (5) (5) (5) (5) (5) (5) (3) (5) (5) (5) (6) (5) (4) (6) (5) (5) (5) *(4) (5) (5)THERE WAS A COMMUNITY 271 69 71 131 137 55 79 35 84 99 53 70 48 122 28 37 97 100 150 120 INITIATIVE THAT 68% 62% 59% 78% 66% 71% 68% 58% 67% 72% 70% 65% 62% 73% 61% 62% 68% 74% 65% 72% RECOGNIZED EMPLOYERS WITH (6) (6) (6) (6) (6) (6) (6) (6) (6) (6) (5) (6) (6) (5) (6) (6) (6) (6) (6) (6) HEALTHY WORKPLACES. P U B L I C O P I N I O N S T R A T E G I E S
    • WORKPLACE WELLNESS INITIATIVES STUDY / 12430 / SEPTEMBER 2012 PAGE 113Table 38-2Summary of Creating/Expanding Initiative Statements: % Total AgreeBANNER 2 WELLNESS ROLE OF IMPORTANT ISSUES (%10) HEALTH CONCERNS (COMBINED) - BENEFICIAL STATE/LOCAL GOVT ROLE OF FED GOVT ======================== =============================== ================= ================= ================= DECR LACK HIGH NOT INSU- PROD- WORK- OBES- STRESS OF CHRON BLOOD VERY/ MORE LESS NO MORE LESS NO RANCE UCTI- ABSEN- ERS ITY/ /MEN- FIT- DIS- PRE- AT ACT- ACT- CHAN- ACT- ACT- CHAN- TOTAL COSTS VITY TEEISM COMP WEIGHT TAL NESS EASE SSURE VERY SMWT ALL IVE IVE GE IVE IVE GE ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ------ ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----BASE=TOTAL ASKED 406 197 140 120 110 211 207 205 133 136 154 199 51 184 60 148 152 79 157 100% 49% 34% 30% 27% 52% 51% 50% 33% 33% 38% 49% 13% 45% 15% 36% 37% 19% 39%HEALTH PLANS OFFERED 368 180 127 111 101 195 192 186 124 125 137 185 45 170 54 134 137 72 144 PREMIUM DISCOUNTS OR 92% 93% 92% 93% 93% 94% 93% 92% 95% 93% 90% 93% 90% 93% 90% 91% 91% 91% 93% REBATES FOR THESE (1) (2) (2) (2) (2) (1) (2) (1) (2) (1) (3) (1) (1) (2) (1) (1) (2) (1) (1) INITIATIVES.WE COULD DEMONSTRATE A 366 182 130 112 103 191 191 185 125 118 145 179 41 171 52 133 140 70 142 FINANCIAL RETURN ON 91% 93% 94% 94% 94% 92% 94% 91% 95% 89% 95% 91% 82% 94% 87% 90% 93% 89% 90% INVESTMENT FOR THESE (2) (1) (1) (1) (1) (2) (1) (2) (1) (2) (1) (2) (2) (1) (2) (2) (1) (2) (2) INITIATIVES.IT WOULD HELP ATTRACT AND 336 171 123 104 95 176 177 170 111 113 139 161 35 161 43 125 131 61 132 RETAIN TALENTED 84% 88% 90% 88% 87% 85% 87% 84% 84% 84% 92% 81% 71% 88% 72% 85% 87% 77% 85% EMPLOYEES. (3) (3) (3) (3) (3) (3) (3) (3) (3) (3) (2) (4) (4) (3) (3) (3) (3) (3) (3)THE STATE AND FEDERAL 319 153 113 97 86 165 167 156 101 110 118 162 38 158 41 113 126 56 124 GOVERNMENT PROVIDED TAX 80% 79% 84% 83% 80% 80% 82% 78% 77% 83% 80% 82% 78% 87% 71% 76% 85% 73% 79% INCENTIVES FOR THESE (4) (4) (4) (4) (4) (4) (4) (4) (5) (4) (4) (3) (3) (4) (4) (4) (4) (4) (4) INITIATIVES.MY EMPLOYEES ACTIVELY 296 150 105 91 86 155 163 151 101 96 117 145 34 141 39 107 111 52 121 REQUESTED SUCH AN 74% 78% 77% 77% 79% 75% 80% 74% 78% 72% 77% 74% 67% 77% 65% 73% 74% 66% 78% INITIATIVE. (5) (5) (5) (5) (5) (5) (5) (5) (4) (5) (5) (5) (5) (5) (5) (5) (5) (5) (5)THERE WAS A COMMUNITY 271 142 104 87 82 148 146 139 87 87 116 128 26 135 36 94 107 49 105 INITIATIVE THAT 68% 73% 76% 74% 75% 72% 71% 68% 66% 65% 77% 65% 53% 74% 61% 64% 71% 63% 68% RECOGNIZED EMPLOYERS WITH (6) (6) (6) (6) (6) (6) (6) (6) (6) (6) (6) (6) (6) (6) (6) (6) (6) (6) (6) HEALTHY WORKPLACES. P U B L I C O P I N I O N S T R A T E G I E S
    • WORKPLACE WELLNESS INITIATIVES STUDY / 12430 / SEPTEMBER 2012 PAGE 114Table 38-3Summary of Creating/Expanding Initiative Statements: % Total AgreeBANNER 3 ------------------- AMONG THOSE WITH WELLNESS INITIATIVE --------------------- HAVE WELLNESS % OF YEARS FINANCIAL EMPLOYEE ACCESS INITATIVE OPERATING BUDGET IN OPERATION INCENTIVE ROI TO INITIATIVE =========== ================= ================= =========== =========== ================== 6% OR 1-2 3-4 5+ TOTAL YES NO 0-1% 2-5% MORE YRS YRS YRS YES NO YES NO 0-74% 75-84% 85%+ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ -----BASE=TOTAL ASKED 406 224 182 78 64 26 73 43 90 111 110 90 124 19 13 172 100% 55% 45% 35% 29% 12% 33% 19% 40% 50% 49% 40% 55% 8% 6% 77%HEALTH PLANS OFFERED 368 199 169 70 57 22 62 40 81 105 92 86 104 17 11 154 PREMIUM DISCOUNTS OR 92% 90% 93% 90% 90% 88% 87% 93% 91% 95% 85% 96% 85% 94% 85% 90% REBATES FOR THESE (1) (1) *(1) (1) *(1) *(1) (2) (2) (1) (2) (2) (2) (1) (1) *(1) *(1) INITIATIVES.WE COULD DEMONSTRATE A 366 197 169 69 57 21 61 40 79 107 88 86 102 17 11 154 FINANCIAL RETURN ON 91% 89% 93% 88% 90% 81% 85% 95% 88% 97% 81% 97% 83% 89% 85% 90% INVESTMENT FOR THESE (2) (2) *(1) (2) *(1) (5) (3) (1) (2) (1) (3) (1) (3) *(2) *(1) *(1) INITIATIVES.IT WOULD HELP ATTRACT AND 336 193 143 68 55 20 64 39 75 99 94 84 103 17 9 152 RETAIN TALENTED 84% 88% 79% 87% 86% 80% 90% 91% 84% 89% 86% 93% 84% 89% 69% 89% EMPLOYEES. (3) (3) (4) (3) (3) (6) (1) (3) (3) (3) (1) (3) (2) *(2) (4) (3)THE STATE AND FEDERAL 319 168 151 58 47 22 52 33 69 84 84 69 93 14 8 132 GOVERNMENT PROVIDED TAX 80% 77% 84% 74% 73% 88% 74% 77% 78% 76% 79% 77% 76% 74% 62% 78% INCENTIVES FOR THESE (4) (5) (3) (5) (4) *(1) (5) *(4) (4) (5) (4) (5) (4) (5) (5) (5) INITIATIVES.MY EMPLOYEES ACTIVELY 296 170 126 62 41 22 56 33 66 88 80 70 92 13 11 133 REQUESTED SUCH AN 74% 77% 70% 81% 64% 88% 78% 77% 75% 80% 74% 79% 75% 68% 85% 78% INITIATIVE. (5) (4) (5) (4) (6) *(1) (4) *(4) (5) (4) (5) (4) (5) (6) *(1) (4)THERE WAS A COMMUNITY 271 157 114 50 43 21 51 31 60 79 77 68 82 16 7 120 INITIATIVE THAT 68% 71% 64% 64% 67% 84% 72% 72% 67% 71% 71% 76% 67% 84% 54% 70% RECOGNIZED EMPLOYERS WITH (6) (6) (6) (6) (5) (4) (6) (6) (6) (6) (6) (6) (6) (4) (6) (6) HEALTHY WORKPLACES. P U B L I C O P I N I O N S T R A T E G I E S
    • WORKPLACE WELLNESS INITIATIVES STUDY / 12430 / SEPTEMBER 2012 PAGE 115Table 39-1QUESTION 30:Please select if you AGREE or DISAGREE with the following statements. My organization would be interested in creating or expanding a worksite wellness initiative if:We could demonstrate a financial return on investment for these initiatives.BANNER 1 ORG HEALTH ORGANIZATION SIZE PROFIT STATUS REGION EMPLOYEES W/ CARE YEARS IN OPERATION GRADE ================= ================= ======================= ================== ======================= =========== NON- 100- PRIV- PUB- PROF/ NORTH MID- 0-10 11-20 21-50 51+ TOTAL 1-99 499 500+ ATE LIC GOVT -EAST SOUTH WEST WEST 0-74% 75-84% 85%+ YRS YRS YRS YRS A/B C/D/F ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----BASE=TOTAL ASKED 402 111 124 167 210 77 115 61 127 139 75 108 79 167 46 60 144 135 232 167 100% 28% 31% 42% 52% 19% 29% 15% 32% 35% 19% 27% 20% 42% 11% 15% 36% 34% 58% 42%**D/S (AGREE - DISAGREE) 330 79 100 151 162 69 99 53 109 115 53 96 69 137 30 52 120 115 192 135 82% 71% 81% 90% 77% 90% 86% 87% 86% 83% 71% 89% 87% 82% 65% 87% 83% 85% 83% 81%TOTAL AGREE 366 95 112 159 186 73 107 57 118 127 64 102 74 152 38 56 132 125 212 151----------- 91% 86% 90% 95% 89% 95% 93% 93% 93% 91% 85% 94% 94% 91% 83% 93% 92% 93% 91% 90%TOTAL DISAGREE 36 16 12 8 24 4 8 4 9 12 11 6 5 15 8 4 12 10 20 16-------------- 9% 14% 10% 5% 11% 5% 7% 7% 7% 9% 15% 6% 6% 9% 17% 7% 8% 7% 9% 10% STRONGLY AGREE 218 47 72 99 107 40 71 37 63 78 40 58 47 89 24 30 76 79 115 100 54% 42% 58% 59% 51% 52% 62% 61% 50% 56% 53% 54% 59% 53% 52% 50% 53% 59% 50% 60% SOMEWHAT AGREE 148 48 40 60 79 33 36 20 55 49 24 44 27 63 14 26 56 46 97 51 37% 43% 32% 36% 38% 43% 31% 33% 43% 35% 32% 41% 34% 38% 30% 43% 39% 34% 42% 31% SOMEWHAT DISAGREE 32 16 9 7 22 3 7 3 8 11 10 5 5 13 8 4 9 9 18 14 8% 14% 7% 4% 10% 4% 6% 5% 6% 8% 13% 5% 6% 8% 17% 7% 6% 7% 8% 8% STRONGLY DISAGREE 4 - 3 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 - 2 - - 3 1 2 2 1% - 2% 1% 1% 1% 1% 2% 1% 1% 1% 1% - 1% - - 2% 1% 1% 1% P U B L I C O P I N I O N S T R A T E G I E S
    • WORKPLACE WELLNESS INITIATIVES STUDY / 12430 / SEPTEMBER 2012 PAGE 116Table 39-2QUESTION 30:Please select if you AGREE or DISAGREE with the following statements. My organization would be interested in creating or expanding a worksite wellness initiative if:We could demonstrate a financial return on investment for these initiatives.BANNER 2 WELLNESS ROLE OF IMPORTANT ISSUES (%10) HEALTH CONCERNS (COMBINED) - BENEFICIAL STATE/LOCAL GOVT ROLE OF FED GOVT ======================== =============================== ================= ================= ================= DECR LACK HIGH NOT INSU- PROD- WORK- OBES- STRESS OF CHRON BLOOD VERY/ MORE LESS NO MORE LESS NO RANCE UCTI- ABSEN- ERS ITY/ /MEN- FIT- DIS- PRE- AT ACT- ACT- CHAN- ACT- ACT- CHAN- TOTAL COSTS VITY TEEISM COMP WEIGHT TAL NESS EASE SSURE VERY SMWT ALL IVE IVE GE IVE IVE GE ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ------ ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----BASE=TOTAL ASKED 402 195 138 119 109 208 204 203 132 133 153 197 50 182 60 148 150 79 157 100% 49% 34% 30% 27% 52% 51% 50% 33% 33% 38% 49% 12% 45% 15% 37% 37% 20% 39%**D/S (AGREE - DISAGREE) 330 169 122 105 97 174 178 167 118 103 137 161 32 160 44 118 130 61 127 82% 87% 88% 88% 89% 84% 87% 82% 89% 77% 90% 82% 64% 88% 73% 80% 87% 77% 81%TOTAL AGREE 366 182 130 112 103 191 191 185 125 118 145 179 41 171 52 133 140 70 142----------- 91% 93% 94% 94% 94% 92% 94% 91% 95% 89% 95% 91% 82% 94% 87% 90% 93% 89% 90%TOTAL DISAGREE 36 13 8 7 6 17 13 18 7 15 8 18 9 11 8 15 10 9 15-------------- 9% 7% 6% 6% 6% 8% 6% 9% 5% 11% 5% 9% 18% 6% 13% 10% 7% 11% 10% STRONGLY AGREE 218 118 83 64 66 120 116 103 75 80 94 107 17 111 27 74 93 39 79 54% 61% 60% 54% 61% 58% 57% 51% 57% 60% 61% 54% 34% 61% 45% 50% 62% 49% 50% SOMEWHAT AGREE 148 64 47 48 37 71 75 82 50 38 51 72 24 60 25 59 47 31 63 37% 33% 34% 40% 34% 34% 37% 40% 38% 29% 33% 37% 48% 33% 42% 40% 31% 39% 40% SOMEWHAT DISAGREE 32 13 8 7 6 15 12 15 6 14 8 17 6 10 6 14 9 7 14 8% 7% 6% 6% 6% 7% 6% 7% 5% 11% 5% 9% 12% 5% 10% 9% 6% 9% 9% STRONGLY DISAGREE 4 - - - - 2 1 3 1 1 - 1 3 1 2 1 1 2 1 1% - - - - 1% - 1% 1% 1% - 1% 6% 1% 3% 1% 1% 3% 1% P U B L I C O P I N I O N S T R A T E G I E S
    • WORKPLACE WELLNESS INITIATIVES STUDY / 12430 / SEPTEMBER 2012 PAGE 117Table 39-3QUESTION 30:Please select if you AGREE or DISAGREE with the following statements. My organization would be interested in creating or expanding a worksite wellness initiative if:We could demonstrate a financial return on investment for these initiatives.BANNER 3 ------------------- AMONG THOSE WITH WELLNESS INITIATIVE --------------------- HAVE WELLNESS % OF YEARS FINANCIAL EMPLOYEE ACCESS INITATIVE OPERATING BUDGET IN OPERATION INCENTIVE ROI TO INITIATIVE =========== ================= ================= =========== =========== ================== 6% OR 1-2 3-4 5+ TOTAL YES NO 0-1% 2-5% MORE YRS YRS YRS YES NO YES NO 0-74% 75-84% 85%+ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ -----BASE=TOTAL ASKED 402 221 181 78 63 26 72 42 90 110 109 89 123 19 13 171 100% 55% 45% 35% 29% 12% 33% 19% 41% 50% 49% 40% 56% 9% 6% 77%**D/S (AGREE - DISAGREE) 330 173 157 60 51 16 50 38 68 104 67 83 81 15 9 137 82% 78% 87% 77% 81% 62% 69% 90% 76% 95% 61% 93% 66% 79% 69% 80%TOTAL AGREE 366 197 169 69 57 21 61 40 79 107 88 86 102 17 11 154----------- 91% 89% 93% 88% 90% 81% 85% 95% 88% 97% 81% 97% 83% 89% 85% 90%TOTAL DISAGREE 36 24 12 9 6 5 11 2 11 3 21 3 21 2 2 17-------------- 9% 11% 7% 12% 10% 19% 15% 5% 12% 3% 19% 3% 17% 11% 15% 10% STRONGLY AGREE 218 127 91 51 31 17 41 27 49 71 54 54 67 11 8 97 54% 57% 50% 65% 49% 65% 57% 64% 54% 65% 50% 61% 54% 58% 62% 57% SOMEWHAT AGREE 148 70 78 18 26 4 20 13 30 36 34 32 35 6 3 57 37% 32% 43% 23% 41% 15% 28% 31% 33% 33% 31% 36% 28% 32% 23% 33% SOMEWHAT DISAGREE 32 22 10 9 5 5 11 2 9 3 19 3 19 2 2 16 8% 10% 6% 12% 8% 19% 15% 5% 10% 3% 17% 3% 15% 11% 15% 9% STRONGLY DISAGREE 4 2 2 - 1 - - - 2 - 2 - 2 - - 1 1% 1% 1% - 2% - - - 2% - 2% - 2% - - 1% P U B L I C O P I N I O N S T R A T E G I E S
    • WORKPLACE WELLNESS INITIATIVES STUDY / 12430 / SEPTEMBER 2012 PAGE 118Table 40-1QUESTION 31:Please select if you AGREE or DISAGREE with the following statements. My organization would be interested in creating or expanding a worksite wellness initiative if:My employees actively requested such an initiative.BANNER 1 ORG HEALTH ORGANIZATION SIZE PROFIT STATUS REGION EMPLOYEES W/ CARE YEARS IN OPERATION GRADE ================= ================= ======================= ================== ======================= =========== NON- 100- PRIV- PUB- PROF/ NORTH MID- 0-10 11-20 21-50 51+ TOTAL 1-99 499 500+ ATE LIC GOVT -EAST SOUTH WEST WEST 0-74% 75-84% 85%+ YRS YRS YRS YRS A/B C/D/F ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----BASE=TOTAL ASKED 400 111 122 167 209 76 115 61 126 138 75 108 78 167 46 59 142 135 230 168 100% 28% 31% 42% 52% 19% 29% 15% 32% 35% 19% 27% 20% 42% 12% 15% 36% 34% 58% 42%**D/S (AGREE - DISAGREE) 192 35 62 95 77 40 75 27 50 86 29 62 46 67 16 21 68 75 108 82 48% 32% 51% 57% 37% 53% 65% 44% 40% 62% 39% 57% 59% 40% 35% 36% 48% 56% 47% 49%TOTAL AGREE 296 73 92 131 143 58 95 44 88 112 52 85 62 117 31 40 105 105 169 125----------- 74% 66% 75% 78% 68% 76% 83% 72% 70% 81% 69% 79% 79% 70% 67% 68% 74% 78% 73% 74%TOTAL DISAGREE 104 38 30 36 66 18 20 17 38 26 23 23 16 50 15 19 37 30 61 43-------------- 26% 34% 25% 22% 32% 24% 17% 28% 30% 19% 31% 21% 21% 30% 33% 32% 26% 22% 27% 26% STRONGLY AGREE 138 41 37 60 74 25 39 21 34 56 27 38 32 56 16 22 43 50 80 58 35% 37% 30% 36% 35% 33% 34% 34% 27% 41% 36% 35% 41% 34% 35% 37% 30% 37% 35% 35% SOMEWHAT AGREE 158 32 55 71 69 33 56 23 54 56 25 47 30 61 15 18 62 55 89 67 40% 29% 45% 43% 33% 43% 49% 38% 43% 41% 33% 44% 38% 37% 33% 31% 44% 41% 39% 40% SOMEWHAT DISAGREE 75 26 21 28 49 14 12 12 26 20 17 13 13 41 12 12 25 23 42 33 19% 23% 17% 17% 23% 18% 10% 20% 21% 14% 23% 12% 17% 25% 26% 20% 18% 17% 18% 20% STRONGLY DISAGREE 29 12 9 8 17 4 8 5 12 6 6 10 3 9 3 7 12 7 19 10 7% 11% 7% 5% 8% 5% 7% 8% 10% 4% 8% 9% 4% 5% 7% 12% 8% 5% 8% 6% P U B L I C O P I N I O N S T R A T E G I E S
    • WORKPLACE WELLNESS INITIATIVES STUDY / 12430 / SEPTEMBER 2012 PAGE 119Table 40-2QUESTION 31:Please select if you AGREE or DISAGREE with the following statements. My organization would be interested in creating or expanding a worksite wellness initiative if:My employees actively requested such an initiative.BANNER 2 WELLNESS ROLE OF IMPORTANT ISSUES (%10) HEALTH CONCERNS (COMBINED) - BENEFICIAL STATE/LOCAL GOVT ROLE OF FED GOVT ======================== =============================== ================= ================= ================= DECR LACK HIGH NOT INSU- PROD- WORK- OBES- STRESS OF CHRON BLOOD VERY/ MORE LESS NO MORE LESS NO RANCE UCTI- ABSEN- ERS ITY/ /MEN- FIT- DIS- PRE- AT ACT- ACT- CHAN- ACT- ACT- CHAN- TOTAL COSTS VITY TEEISM COMP WEIGHT TAL NESS EASE SSURE VERY SMWT ALL IVE IVE GE IVE IVE GE ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ------ ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----BASE=TOTAL ASKED 400 193 136 118 109 206 205 203 130 133 151 196 51 182 60 146 150 79 155 100% 48% 34% 30% 27% 52% 51% 51% 33% 33% 38% 49% 13% 46% 15% 37% 38% 20% 39%**D/S (AGREE - DISAGREE) 192 107 74 64 63 104 121 99 72 59 83 94 17 100 18 68 72 25 87 48% 55% 54% 54% 58% 50% 59% 49% 55% 44% 55% 48% 33% 55% 30% 47% 48% 32% 56%TOTAL AGREE 296 150 105 91 86 155 163 151 101 96 117 145 34 141 39 107 111 52 121----------- 74% 78% 77% 77% 79% 75% 80% 74% 78% 72% 77% 74% 67% 77% 65% 73% 74% 66% 78%TOTAL DISAGREE 104 43 31 27 23 51 42 52 29 37 34 51 17 41 21 39 39 27 34-------------- 26% 22% 23% 23% 21% 25% 20% 26% 22% 28% 23% 26% 33% 23% 35% 27% 26% 34% 22% STRONGLY AGREE 138 71 53 43 42 73 78 70 47 42 56 63 19 62 21 52 51 31 54 35% 37% 39% 36% 39% 35% 38% 34% 36% 32% 37% 32% 37% 34% 35% 36% 34% 39% 35% SOMEWHAT AGREE 158 79 52 48 44 82 85 81 54 54 61 82 15 79 18 55 60 21 67 40% 41% 38% 41% 40% 40% 41% 40% 42% 41% 40% 42% 29% 43% 30% 38% 40% 27% 43% SOMEWHAT DISAGREE 75 29 22 19 15 39 31 37 20 25 26 35 12 29 13 31 30 16 26 19% 15% 16% 16% 14% 19% 15% 18% 15% 19% 17% 18% 24% 16% 22% 21% 20% 20% 17% STRONGLY DISAGREE 29 14 9 8 8 12 11 15 9 12 8 16 5 12 8 8 9 11 8 7% 7% 7% 7% 7% 6% 5% 7% 7% 9% 5% 8% 10% 7% 13% 5% 6% 14% 5% P U B L I C O P I N I O N S T R A T E G I E S
    • WORKPLACE WELLNESS INITIATIVES STUDY / 12430 / SEPTEMBER 2012 PAGE 120Table 40-3QUESTION 31:Please select if you AGREE or DISAGREE with the following statements. My organization would be interested in creating or expanding a worksite wellness initiative if:My employees actively requested such an initiative.BANNER 3 ------------------- AMONG THOSE WITH WELLNESS INITIATIVE --------------------- HAVE WELLNESS % OF YEARS FINANCIAL EMPLOYEE ACCESS INITATIVE OPERATING BUDGET IN OPERATION INCENTIVE ROI TO INITIATIVE =========== ================= ================= =========== =========== ================== 6% OR 1-2 3-4 5+ TOTAL YES NO 0-1% 2-5% MORE YRS YRS YRS YES NO YES NO 0-74% 75-84% 85%+ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ -----BASE=TOTAL ASKED 400 220 180 77 64 25 72 43 88 110 108 89 122 19 13 170 100% 55% 45% 35% 29% 11% 33% 20% 40% 50% 49% 40% 55% 9% 6% 77%**D/S (AGREE - DISAGREE) 192 120 72 47 18 19 40 23 44 66 52 51 62 7 9 96 48% 55% 40% 61% 28% 76% 56% 53% 50% 60% 48% 57% 51% 37% 69% 56%TOTAL AGREE 296 170 126 62 41 22 56 33 66 88 80 70 92 13 11 133----------- 74% 77% 70% 81% 64% 88% 78% 77% 75% 80% 74% 79% 75% 68% 85% 78%TOTAL DISAGREE 104 50 54 15 23 3 16 10 22 22 28 19 30 6 2 37-------------- 26% 23% 30% 19% 36% 12% 22% 23% 25% 20% 26% 21% 25% 32% 15% 22% STRONGLY AGREE 138 72 66 28 21 9 25 17 23 42 29 34 35 5 5 56 35% 33% 37% 36% 33% 36% 35% 40% 26% 38% 27% 38% 29% 26% 38% 33% SOMEWHAT AGREE 158 98 60 34 20 13 31 16 43 46 51 36 57 8 6 77 40% 45% 33% 44% 31% 52% 43% 37% 49% 42% 47% 40% 47% 42% 46% 45% SOMEWHAT DISAGREE 75 41 34 13 19 3 13 8 19 18 23 16 24 4 1 34 19% 19% 19% 17% 30% 12% 18% 19% 22% 16% 21% 18% 20% 21% 8% 20% STRONGLY DISAGREE 29 9 20 2 4 - 3 2 3 4 5 3 6 2 1 3 7% 4% 11% 3% 6% - 4% 5% 3% 4% 5% 3% 5% 11% 8% 2% P U B L I C O P I N I O N S T R A T E G I E S
    • WORKPLACE WELLNESS INITIATIVES STUDY / 12430 / SEPTEMBER 2012 PAGE 121Table 41-1QUESTION 32:Please select if you AGREE or DISAGREE with the following statements. My organization would be interested in creating or expanding a worksite wellness initiative if:There was a community initiative that recognized employers with healthy workplaces.BANNER 1 ORG HEALTH ORGANIZATION SIZE PROFIT STATUS REGION EMPLOYEES W/ CARE YEARS IN OPERATION GRADE ================= ================= ======================= ================== ======================= =========== NON- 100- PRIV- PUB- PROF/ NORTH MID- 0-10 11-20 21-50 51+ TOTAL 1-99 499 500+ ATE LIC GOVT -EAST SOUTH WEST WEST 0-74% 75-84% 85%+ YRS YRS YRS YRS A/B C/D/F ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----BASE=TOTAL ASKED 400 112 120 168 207 77 116 60 126 138 76 107 78 168 46 60 142 135 232 166 100% 28% 30% 42% 52% 19% 29% 15% 32% 35% 19% 27% 20% 42% 12% 15% 36% 34% 58% 42%**D/S (AGREE - DISAGREE) 142 26 22 94 67 33 42 10 42 60 30 33 18 76 10 14 52 65 68 74 36% 23% 18% 56% 32% 43% 36% 17% 33% 43% 39% 31% 23% 45% 22% 23% 37% 48% 29% 45%TOTAL AGREE 271 69 71 131 137 55 79 35 84 99 53 70 48 122 28 37 97 100 150 120----------- 68% 62% 59% 78% 66% 71% 68% 58% 67% 72% 70% 65% 62% 73% 61% 62% 68% 74% 65% 72%TOTAL DISAGREE 129 43 49 37 70 22 37 25 42 39 23 37 30 46 18 23 45 35 82 46-------------- 32% 38% 41% 22% 34% 29% 32% 42% 33% 28% 30% 35% 38% 27% 39% 38% 32% 26% 35% 28% STRONGLY AGREE 86 20 21 45 47 14 25 13 25 29 19 23 14 37 12 13 23 35 49 37 22% 18% 18% 27% 23% 18% 22% 22% 20% 21% 25% 21% 18% 22% 26% 22% 16% 26% 21% 22% SOMEWHAT AGREE 185 49 50 86 90 41 54 22 59 70 34 47 34 85 16 24 74 65 101 83 46% 44% 42% 51% 43% 53% 47% 37% 47% 51% 45% 44% 44% 51% 35% 40% 52% 48% 44% 50% SOMEWHAT DISAGREE 100 29 40 31 54 18 28 19 33 31 17 28 25 34 16 17 32 27 66 33 25% 26% 33% 18% 26% 23% 24% 32% 26% 22% 22% 26% 32% 20% 35% 28% 23% 20% 28% 20% STRONGLY DISAGREE 29 14 9 6 16 4 9 6 9 8 6 9 5 12 2 6 13 8 16 13 7% 13% 8% 4% 8% 5% 8% 10% 7% 6% 8% 8% 6% 7% 4% 10% 9% 6% 7% 8% P U B L I C O P I N I O N S T R A T E G I E S
    • WORKPLACE WELLNESS INITIATIVES STUDY / 12430 / SEPTEMBER 2012 PAGE 122Table 41-2QUESTION 32:Please select if you AGREE or DISAGREE with the following statements. My organization would be interested in creating or expanding a worksite wellness initiative if:There was a community initiative that recognized employers with healthy workplaces.BANNER 2 WELLNESS ROLE OF IMPORTANT ISSUES (%10) HEALTH CONCERNS (COMBINED) - BENEFICIAL STATE/LOCAL GOVT ROLE OF FED GOVT ======================== =============================== ================= ================= ================= DECR LACK HIGH NOT INSU- PROD- WORK- OBES- STRESS OF CHRON BLOOD VERY/ MORE LESS NO MORE LESS NO RANCE UCTI- ABSEN- ERS ITY/ /MEN- FIT- DIS- PRE- AT ACT- ACT- CHAN- ACT- ACT- CHAN- TOTAL COSTS VITY TEEISM COMP WEIGHT TAL NESS EASE SSURE VERY SMWT ALL IVE IVE GE IVE IVE GE ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ------ ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----BASE=TOTAL ASKED 400 195 137 118 109 206 206 203 131 134 151 198 49 183 59 147 151 78 155 100% 49% 34% 30% 27% 52% 52% 51% 33% 34% 38% 50% 12% 46% 15% 37% 38% 20% 39%**D/S (AGREE - DISAGREE) 142 89 71 56 55 90 86 75 43 40 81 58 3 87 13 41 63 20 55 36% 46% 52% 47% 50% 44% 42% 37% 33% 30% 54% 29% 6% 48% 22% 28% 42% 26% 35%TOTAL AGREE 271 142 104 87 82 148 146 139 87 87 116 128 26 135 36 94 107 49 105----------- 68% 73% 76% 74% 75% 72% 71% 68% 66% 65% 77% 65% 53% 74% 61% 64% 71% 63% 68%TOTAL DISAGREE 129 53 33 31 27 58 60 64 44 47 35 70 23 48 23 53 44 29 50-------------- 32% 27% 24% 26% 25% 28% 29% 32% 34% 35% 23% 35% 47% 26% 39% 36% 29% 37% 32% STRONGLY AGREE 86 49 38 31 35 50 49 41 21 36 44 34 8 49 9 28 39 11 35 22% 25% 28% 26% 32% 24% 24% 20% 16% 27% 29% 17% 16% 27% 15% 19% 26% 14% 23% SOMEWHAT AGREE 185 93 66 56 47 98 97 98 66 51 72 94 18 86 27 66 68 38 70 46% 48% 48% 47% 43% 48% 47% 48% 50% 38% 48% 47% 37% 47% 46% 45% 45% 49% 45% SOMEWHAT DISAGREE 100 40 26 26 24 44 47 47 36 39 26 58 15 35 14 46 34 20 40 25% 21% 19% 22% 22% 21% 23% 23% 27% 29% 17% 29% 31% 19% 24% 31% 23% 26% 26% STRONGLY DISAGREE 29 13 7 5 3 14 13 17 8 8 9 12 8 13 9 7 10 9 10 7% 7% 5% 4% 3% 7% 6% 8% 6% 6% 6% 6% 16% 7% 15% 5% 7% 12% 6% P U B L I C O P I N I O N S T R A T E G I E S
    • WORKPLACE WELLNESS INITIATIVES STUDY / 12430 / SEPTEMBER 2012 PAGE 123Table 41-3QUESTION 32:Please select if you AGREE or DISAGREE with the following statements. My organization would be interested in creating or expanding a worksite wellness initiative if:There was a community initiative that recognized employers with healthy workplaces.BANNER 3 ------------------- AMONG THOSE WITH WELLNESS INITIATIVE --------------------- HAVE WELLNESS % OF YEARS FINANCIAL EMPLOYEE ACCESS INITATIVE OPERATING BUDGET IN OPERATION INCENTIVE ROI TO INITIATIVE =========== ================= ================= =========== =========== ================== 6% OR 1-2 3-4 5+ TOTAL YES NO 0-1% 2-5% MORE YRS YRS YRS YES NO YES NO 0-74% 75-84% 85%+ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ -----BASE=TOTAL ASKED 400 221 179 78 64 25 71 43 89 111 109 90 123 19 13 171 100% 55% 45% 35% 29% 11% 32% 19% 40% 50% 49% 41% 56% 9% 6% 77%**D/S (AGREE - DISAGREE) 142 93 49 22 22 17 31 19 31 47 45 46 41 13 1 69 36% 42% 27% 28% 34% 68% 44% 44% 35% 42% 41% 51% 33% 68% 8% 40%TOTAL AGREE 271 157 114 50 43 21 51 31 60 79 77 68 82 16 7 120----------- 68% 71% 64% 64% 67% 84% 72% 72% 67% 71% 71% 76% 67% 84% 54% 70%TOTAL DISAGREE 129 64 65 28 21 4 20 12 29 32 32 22 41 3 6 51-------------- 32% 29% 36% 36% 33% 16% 28% 28% 33% 29% 29% 24% 33% 16% 46% 30% STRONGLY AGREE 86 57 29 16 13 13 21 8 22 30 27 30 24 7 2 44 22% 26% 16% 21% 20% 52% 30% 19% 25% 27% 25% 33% 20% 37% 15% 26% SOMEWHAT AGREE 185 100 85 34 30 8 30 23 38 49 50 38 58 9 5 76 46% 45% 47% 44% 47% 32% 42% 53% 43% 44% 46% 42% 47% 47% 38% 44% SOMEWHAT DISAGREE 100 48 52 21 16 4 16 7 23 25 23 21 26 2 3 39 25% 22% 29% 27% 25% 16% 23% 16% 26% 23% 21% 23% 21% 11% 23% 23% STRONGLY DISAGREE 29 16 13 7 5 - 4 5 6 7 9 1 15 1 3 12 7% 7% 7% 9% 8% - 6% 12% 7% 6% 8% 1% 12% 5% 23% 7% P U B L I C O P I N I O N S T R A T E G I E S
    • WORKPLACE WELLNESS INITIATIVES STUDY / 12430 / SEPTEMBER 2012 PAGE 124Table 42-1QUESTION 33:Please select if you AGREE or DISAGREE with the following statements. My organization would be interested in creating or expanding a worksite wellness initiative if:It would help attract and retain talented employees.BANNER 1 ORG HEALTH ORGANIZATION SIZE PROFIT STATUS REGION EMPLOYEES W/ CARE YEARS IN OPERATION GRADE ================= ================= ======================= ================== ======================= =========== NON- 100- PRIV- PUB- PROF/ NORTH MID- 0-10 11-20 21-50 51+ TOTAL 1-99 499 500+ ATE LIC GOVT -EAST SOUTH WEST WEST 0-74% 75-84% 85%+ YRS YRS YRS YRS A/B C/D/F ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----BASE=TOTAL ASKED 400 110 122 168 207 77 116 61 127 138 74 108 79 166 46 60 143 134 231 167 100% 28% 31% 42% 52% 19% 29% 15% 32% 35% 19% 27% 20% 42% 12% 15% 36% 34% 58% 42%**D/S (AGREE - DISAGREE) 272 66 78 128 145 53 74 41 77 104 50 70 55 112 36 40 91 94 171 99 68% 60% 64% 76% 70% 69% 64% 67% 61% 75% 68% 65% 70% 67% 78% 67% 64% 70% 74% 59%TOTAL AGREE 336 88 100 148 176 65 95 51 102 121 62 89 67 139 41 50 117 114 201 133----------- 84% 80% 82% 88% 85% 84% 82% 84% 80% 88% 84% 82% 85% 84% 89% 83% 82% 85% 87% 80%TOTAL DISAGREE 64 22 22 20 31 12 21 10 25 17 12 19 12 27 5 10 26 20 30 34-------------- 16% 20% 18% 12% 15% 16% 18% 16% 20% 12% 16% 18% 15% 16% 11% 17% 18% 15% 13% 20% STRONGLY AGREE 158 39 47 72 91 24 43 30 50 48 30 46 33 61 21 25 49 56 86 72 40% 35% 39% 43% 44% 31% 37% 49% 39% 35% 41% 43% 42% 37% 46% 42% 34% 42% 37% 43% SOMEWHAT AGREE 178 49 53 76 85 41 52 21 52 73 32 43 34 78 20 25 68 58 115 61 45% 45% 43% 45% 41% 53% 45% 34% 41% 53% 43% 40% 43% 47% 43% 42% 48% 43% 50% 37% SOMEWHAT DISAGREE 54 18 18 18 26 11 17 9 20 17 8 16 9 23 4 9 21 17 24 30 14% 16% 15% 11% 13% 14% 15% 15% 16% 12% 11% 15% 11% 14% 9% 15% 15% 13% 10% 18% STRONGLY DISAGREE 10 4 4 2 5 1 4 1 5 - 4 3 3 4 1 1 5 3 6 4 3% 4% 3% 1% 2% 1% 3% 2% 4% - 5% 3% 4% 2% 2% 2% 3% 2% 3% 2% P U B L I C O P I N I O N S T R A T E G I E S
    • WORKPLACE WELLNESS INITIATIVES STUDY / 12430 / SEPTEMBER 2012 PAGE 125Table 42-2QUESTION 33:Please select if you AGREE or DISAGREE with the following statements. My organization would be interested in creating or expanding a worksite wellness initiative if:It would help attract and retain talented employees.BANNER 2 WELLNESS ROLE OF IMPORTANT ISSUES (%10) HEALTH CONCERNS (COMBINED) - BENEFICIAL STATE/LOCAL GOVT ROLE OF FED GOVT ======================== =============================== ================= ================= ================= DECR LACK HIGH NOT INSU- PROD- WORK- OBES- STRESS OF CHRON BLOOD VERY/ MORE LESS NO MORE LESS NO RANCE UCTI- ABSEN- ERS ITY/ /MEN- FIT- DIS- PRE- AT ACT- ACT- CHAN- ACT- ACT- CHAN- TOTAL COSTS VITY TEEISM COMP WEIGHT TAL NESS EASE SSURE VERY SMWT ALL IVE IVE GE IVE IVE GE ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ------ ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----BASE=TOTAL ASKED 400 195 137 118 109 208 204 203 132 134 151 198 49 183 60 147 150 79 156 100% 49% 34% 30% 27% 52% 51% 51% 33% 34% 38% 50% 12% 46% 15% 37% 38% 20% 39%**D/S (AGREE - DISAGREE) 272 147 109 90 81 144 150 137 90 92 127 124 21 139 26 103 112 43 108 68% 75% 80% 76% 74% 69% 74% 67% 68% 69% 84% 63% 43% 76% 43% 70% 75% 54% 69%TOTAL AGREE 336 171 123 104 95 176 177 170 111 113 139 161 35 161 43 125 131 61 132----------- 84% 88% 90% 88% 87% 85% 87% 84% 84% 84% 92% 81% 71% 88% 72% 85% 87% 77% 85%TOTAL DISAGREE 64 24 14 14 14 32 27 33 21 21 12 37 14 22 17 22 19 18 24-------------- 16% 12% 10% 12% 13% 15% 13% 16% 16% 16% 8% 19% 29% 12% 28% 15% 13% 23% 15% STRONGLY AGREE 158 85 66 50 47 89 84 84 49 57 76 68 14 83 17 57 69 24 63 40% 44% 48% 42% 43% 43% 41% 41% 37% 43% 50% 34% 29% 45% 28% 39% 46% 30% 40% SOMEWHAT AGREE 178 86 57 54 48 87 93 86 62 56 63 93 21 78 26 68 62 37 69 45% 44% 42% 46% 44% 42% 46% 42% 47% 42% 42% 47% 43% 43% 43% 46% 41% 47% 44% SOMEWHAT DISAGREE 54 21 14 14 13 26 22 25 19 19 11 31 11 20 13 18 18 14 19 14% 11% 10% 12% 12% 13% 11% 12% 14% 14% 7% 16% 22% 11% 22% 12% 12% 18% 12% STRONGLY DISAGREE 10 3 - - 1 6 5 8 2 2 1 6 3 2 4 4 1 4 5 3% 2% - - 1% 3% 2% 4% 2% 1% 1% 3% 6% 1% 7% 3% 1% 5% 3% P U B L I C O P I N I O N S T R A T E G I E S
    • WORKPLACE WELLNESS INITIATIVES STUDY / 12430 / SEPTEMBER 2012 PAGE 126Table 42-3QUESTION 33:Please select if you AGREE or DISAGREE with the following statements. My organization would be interested in creating or expanding a worksite wellness initiative if:It would help attract and retain talented employees.BANNER 3 ------------------- AMONG THOSE WITH WELLNESS INITIATIVE --------------------- HAVE WELLNESS % OF YEARS FINANCIAL EMPLOYEE ACCESS INITATIVE OPERATING BUDGET IN OPERATION INCENTIVE ROI TO INITIATIVE =========== ================= ================= =========== =========== ================== 6% OR 1-2 3-4 5+ TOTAL YES NO 0-1% 2-5% MORE YRS YRS YRS YES NO YES NO 0-74% 75-84% 85%+ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ -----BASE=TOTAL ASKED 400 220 180 78 64 25 71 43 89 111 109 90 123 19 13 171 100% 55% 45% 35% 29% 11% 32% 20% 40% 50% 50% 41% 56% 9% 6% 78%**D/S (AGREE - DISAGREE) 272 166 106 58 46 15 57 35 61 87 79 78 83 15 5 133 68% 75% 59% 74% 72% 60% 80% 81% 69% 78% 72% 87% 67% 79% 38% 78%TOTAL AGREE 336 193 143 68 55 20 64 39 75 99 94 84 103 17 9 152----------- 84% 88% 79% 87% 86% 80% 90% 91% 84% 89% 86% 93% 84% 89% 69% 89%TOTAL DISAGREE 64 27 37 10 9 5 7 4 14 12 15 6 20 2 4 19-------------- 16% 12% 21% 13% 14% 20% 10% 9% 16% 11% 14% 7% 16% 11% 31% 11% STRONGLY AGREE 158 93 65 34 25 13 34 19 31 51 42 44 46 11 6 70 40% 42% 36% 44% 39% 52% 48% 44% 35% 46% 39% 49% 37% 58% 46% 41% SOMEWHAT AGREE 178 100 78 34 30 7 30 20 44 48 52 40 57 6 3 82 45% 45% 43% 44% 47% 28% 42% 47% 49% 43% 48% 44% 46% 32% 23% 48% SOMEWHAT DISAGREE 54 25 29 9 8 5 7 3 13 10 15 6 18 2 3 18 14% 11% 16% 12% 13% 20% 10% 7% 15% 9% 14% 7% 15% 11% 23% 11% STRONGLY DISAGREE 10 2 8 1 1 - - 1 1 2 - - 2 - 1 1 3% 1% 4% 1% 2% - - 2% 1% 2% - - 2% - 8% 1% P U B L I C O P I N I O N S T R A T E G I E S
    • WORKPLACE WELLNESS INITIATIVES STUDY / 12430 / SEPTEMBER 2012 PAGE 127Table 43-1QUESTION 34:Please select if you AGREE or DISAGREE with the following statements. My organization would be interested in creating or expanding a worksite wellness initiative if:Health plans offered premium discounts or rebates for these initiatives.BANNER 1 ORG HEALTH ORGANIZATION SIZE PROFIT STATUS REGION EMPLOYEES W/ CARE YEARS IN OPERATION GRADE ================= ================= ======================= ================== ======================= =========== NON- 100- PRIV- PUB- PROF/ NORTH MID- 0-10 11-20 21-50 51+ TOTAL 1-99 499 500+ ATE LIC GOVT -EAST SOUTH WEST WEST 0-74% 75-84% 85%+ YRS YRS YRS YRS A/B C/D/F ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----BASE=TOTAL ASKED 402 112 123 167 209 77 116 61 126 139 76 107 79 168 46 60 142 135 233 167 100% 28% 31% 42% 52% 19% 29% 15% 31% 35% 19% 27% 20% 42% 11% 15% 35% 34% 58% 42%**D/S (AGREE - DISAGREE) 334 82 101 151 173 63 98 55 108 119 52 95 63 138 32 48 118 121 187 145 83% 73% 82% 90% 83% 82% 84% 90% 86% 86% 68% 89% 80% 82% 70% 80% 83% 90% 80% 87%TOTAL AGREE 368 97 112 159 191 70 107 58 117 129 64 101 71 153 39 54 130 128 210 156----------- 92% 87% 91% 95% 91% 91% 92% 95% 93% 93% 84% 94% 90% 91% 85% 90% 92% 95% 90% 93%TOTAL DISAGREE 34 15 11 8 18 7 9 3 9 10 12 6 8 15 7 6 12 7 23 11-------------- 8% 13% 9% 5% 9% 9% 8% 5% 7% 7% 16% 6% 10% 9% 15% 10% 8% 5% 10% 7% STRONGLY AGREE 227 57 75 95 114 40 73 35 66 82 44 59 46 98 25 33 78 84 123 102 56% 51% 61% 57% 55% 52% 63% 57% 52% 59% 58% 55% 58% 58% 54% 55% 55% 62% 53% 61% SOMEWHAT AGREE 141 40 37 64 77 30 34 23 51 47 20 42 25 55 14 21 52 44 87 54 35% 36% 30% 38% 37% 39% 29% 38% 40% 34% 26% 39% 32% 33% 30% 35% 37% 33% 37% 32% SOMEWHAT DISAGREE 23 11 7 5 10 5 8 2 7 8 6 4 6 11 5 2 8 6 16 7 6% 10% 6% 3% 5% 6% 7% 3% 6% 6% 8% 4% 8% 7% 11% 3% 6% 4% 7% 4% STRONGLY DISAGREE 11 4 4 3 8 2 1 1 2 2 6 2 2 4 2 4 4 1 7 4 3% 4% 3% 2% 4% 3% 1% 2% 2% 1% 8% 2% 3% 2% 4% 7% 3% 1% 3% 2% P U B L I C O P I N I O N S T R A T E G I E S
    • WORKPLACE WELLNESS INITIATIVES STUDY / 12430 / SEPTEMBER 2012 PAGE 128Table 43-2QUESTION 34:Please select if you AGREE or DISAGREE with the following statements. My organization would be interested in creating or expanding a worksite wellness initiative if:Health plans offered premium discounts or rebates for these initiatives.BANNER 2 WELLNESS ROLE OF IMPORTANT ISSUES (%10) HEALTH CONCERNS (COMBINED) - BENEFICIAL STATE/LOCAL GOVT ROLE OF FED GOVT ======================== =============================== ================= ================= ================= DECR LACK HIGH NOT INSU- PROD- WORK- OBES- STRESS OF CHRON BLOOD VERY/ MORE LESS NO MORE LESS NO RANCE UCTI- ABSEN- ERS ITY/ /MEN- FIT- DIS- PRE- AT ACT- ACT- CHAN- ACT- ACT- CHAN- TOTAL COSTS VITY TEEISM COMP WEIGHT TAL NESS EASE SSURE VERY SMWT ALL IVE IVE GE IVE IVE GE ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ------ ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----BASE=TOTAL ASKED 402 194 138 119 109 207 206 203 131 135 152 198 50 183 60 147 151 79 155 100% 48% 34% 30% 27% 51% 51% 50% 33% 34% 38% 49% 12% 46% 15% 37% 38% 20% 39%**D/S (AGREE - DISAGREE) 334 166 116 103 93 183 178 169 117 115 122 172 40 157 48 121 123 65 133 83% 86% 84% 87% 85% 88% 86% 83% 89% 85% 80% 87% 80% 86% 80% 82% 81% 82% 86%TOTAL AGREE 368 180 127 111 101 195 192 186 124 125 137 185 45 170 54 134 137 72 144----------- 92% 93% 92% 93% 93% 94% 93% 92% 95% 93% 90% 93% 90% 93% 90% 91% 91% 91% 93%TOTAL DISAGREE 34 14 11 8 8 12 14 17 7 10 15 13 5 13 6 13 14 7 11-------------- 8% 7% 8% 7% 7% 6% 7% 8% 5% 7% 10% 7% 10% 7% 10% 9% 9% 9% 7% STRONGLY AGREE 227 117 84 70 69 122 117 115 77 83 99 107 20 119 25 80 91 37 93 56% 60% 61% 59% 63% 59% 57% 57% 59% 61% 65% 54% 40% 65% 42% 54% 60% 47% 60% SOMEWHAT AGREE 141 63 43 41 32 73 75 71 47 42 38 78 25 51 29 54 46 35 51 35% 32% 31% 34% 29% 35% 36% 35% 36% 31% 25% 39% 50% 28% 48% 37% 30% 44% 33% SOMEWHAT DISAGREE 23 10 7 5 5 8 11 11 6 6 12 8 2 8 3 10 9 5 7 6% 5% 5% 4% 5% 4% 5% 5% 5% 4% 8% 4% 4% 4% 5% 7% 6% 6% 5% STRONGLY DISAGREE 11 4 4 3 3 4 3 6 1 4 3 5 3 5 3 3 5 2 4 3% 2% 3% 3% 3% 2% 1% 3% 1% 3% 2% 3% 6% 3% 5% 2% 3% 3% 3% P U B L I C O P I N I O N S T R A T E G I E S
    • WORKPLACE WELLNESS INITIATIVES STUDY / 12430 / SEPTEMBER 2012 PAGE 129Table 43-3QUESTION 34:Please select if you AGREE or DISAGREE with the following statements. My organization would be interested in creating or expanding a worksite wellness initiative if:Health plans offered premium discounts or rebates for these initiatives.BANNER 3 ------------------- AMONG THOSE WITH WELLNESS INITIATIVE --------------------- HAVE WELLNESS % OF YEARS FINANCIAL EMPLOYEE ACCESS INITATIVE OPERATING BUDGET IN OPERATION INCENTIVE ROI TO INITIATIVE =========== ================= ================= =========== =========== ================== 6% OR 1-2 3-4 5+ TOTAL YES NO 0-1% 2-5% MORE YRS YRS YRS YES NO YES NO 0-74% 75-84% 85%+ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ -----BASE=TOTAL ASKED 402 221 181 78 63 25 71 43 89 111 108 90 122 18 13 171 100% 55% 45% 35% 29% 11% 32% 19% 40% 50% 49% 41% 55% 8% 6% 77%**D/S (AGREE - DISAGREE) 334 177 157 62 51 19 53 37 73 99 76 82 86 16 9 137 83% 80% 87% 79% 81% 76% 75% 86% 82% 89% 70% 91% 70% 89% 69% 80%TOTAL AGREE 368 199 169 70 57 22 62 40 81 105 92 86 104 17 11 154----------- 92% 90% 93% 90% 90% 88% 87% 93% 91% 95% 85% 96% 85% 94% 85% 90%TOTAL DISAGREE 34 22 12 8 6 3 9 3 8 6 16 4 18 1 2 17-------------- 8% 10% 7% 10% 10% 12% 13% 7% 9% 5% 15% 4% 15% 6% 15% 10% STRONGLY AGREE 227 128 99 48 34 15 43 27 49 76 51 58 67 9 9 99 56% 58% 55% 62% 54% 60% 61% 63% 55% 68% 47% 64% 55% 50% 69% 58% SOMEWHAT AGREE 141 71 70 22 23 7 19 13 32 29 41 28 37 8 2 55 35% 32% 39% 28% 37% 28% 27% 30% 36% 26% 38% 31% 30% 44% 15% 32% SOMEWHAT DISAGREE 23 16 7 5 4 3 7 2 6 3 13 2 14 1 2 11 6% 7% 4% 6% 6% 12% 10% 5% 7% 3% 12% 2% 11% 6% 15% 6% STRONGLY DISAGREE 11 6 5 3 2 - 2 1 2 3 3 2 4 - - 6 3% 3% 3% 4% 3% - 3% 2% 2% 3% 3% 2% 3% - - 4% P U B L I C O P I N I O N S T R A T E G I E S
    • WORKPLACE WELLNESS INITIATIVES STUDY / 12430 / SEPTEMBER 2012 PAGE 130Table 44-1QUESTION 35:Please select if you AGREE or DISAGREE with the following statements. My organization would be interested in creating or expanding a worksite wellness initiative if:The state and federal government provided tax incentives for these initiatives.BANNER 1 ORG HEALTH ORGANIZATION SIZE PROFIT STATUS REGION EMPLOYEES W/ CARE YEARS IN OPERATION GRADE ================= ================= ======================= ================== ======================= =========== NON- 100- PRIV- PUB- PROF/ NORTH MID- 0-10 11-20 21-50 51+ TOTAL 1-99 499 500+ ATE LIC GOVT -EAST SOUTH WEST WEST 0-74% 75-84% 85%+ YRS YRS YRS YRS A/B C/D/F ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----BASE=TOTAL ASKED 397 110 121 166 206 76 115 61 124 137 75 106 79 167 46 59 141 135 229 166 100% 28% 30% 42% 52% 19% 29% 15% 31% 35% 19% 27% 20% 42% 12% 15% 36% 34% 58% 42%**D/S (AGREE - DISAGREE) 241 54 79 108 122 60 59 35 80 89 37 62 33 117 32 37 89 75 145 94 61% 49% 65% 65% 59% 79% 51% 57% 65% 65% 49% 58% 42% 70% 70% 63% 63% 56% 63% 57%TOTAL AGREE 319 82 100 137 164 68 87 48 102 113 56 84 56 142 39 48 115 105 187 130----------- 80% 75% 83% 83% 80% 89% 76% 79% 82% 82% 75% 79% 71% 85% 85% 81% 82% 78% 82% 78%TOTAL DISAGREE 78 28 21 29 42 8 28 13 22 24 19 22 23 25 7 11 26 30 42 36-------------- 20% 25% 17% 17% 20% 11% 24% 21% 18% 18% 25% 21% 29% 15% 15% 19% 18% 22% 18% 22% STRONGLY AGREE 176 40 55 81 90 35 51 30 50 63 33 48 36 74 22 25 65 58 95 81 44% 36% 45% 49% 44% 46% 44% 49% 40% 46% 44% 45% 46% 44% 48% 42% 46% 43% 41% 49% SOMEWHAT AGREE 143 42 45 56 74 33 36 18 52 50 23 36 20 68 17 23 50 47 92 49 36% 38% 37% 34% 36% 43% 31% 30% 42% 36% 31% 34% 25% 41% 37% 39% 35% 35% 40% 30% SOMEWHAT DISAGREE 49 18 12 19 26 4 19 7 14 16 12 13 14 16 5 7 14 20 29 20 12% 16% 10% 11% 13% 5% 17% 11% 11% 12% 16% 12% 18% 10% 11% 12% 10% 15% 13% 12% STRONGLY DISAGREE 29 10 9 10 16 4 9 6 8 8 7 9 9 9 2 4 12 10 13 16 7% 9% 7% 6% 8% 5% 8% 10% 6% 6% 9% 8% 11% 5% 4% 7% 9% 7% 6% 10% P U B L I C O P I N I O N S T R A T E G I E S
    • WORKPLACE WELLNESS INITIATIVES STUDY / 12430 / SEPTEMBER 2012 PAGE 131Table 44-2QUESTION 35:Please select if you AGREE or DISAGREE with the following statements. My organization would be interested in creating or expanding a worksite wellness initiative if:The state and federal government provided tax incentives for these initiatives.BANNER 2 WELLNESS ROLE OF IMPORTANT ISSUES (%10) HEALTH CONCERNS (COMBINED) - BENEFICIAL STATE/LOCAL GOVT ROLE OF FED GOVT ======================== =============================== ================= ================= ================= DECR LACK HIGH NOT INSU- PROD- WORK- OBES- STRESS OF CHRON BLOOD VERY/ MORE LESS NO MORE LESS NO RANCE UCTI- ABSEN- ERS ITY/ /MEN- FIT- DIS- PRE- AT ACT- ACT- CHAN- ACT- ACT- CHAN- TOTAL COSTS VITY TEEISM COMP WEIGHT TAL NESS EASE SSURE VERY SMWT ALL IVE IVE GE IVE IVE GE ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ------ ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----BASE=TOTAL ASKED 397 193 135 117 108 206 203 201 131 133 148 198 49 181 58 148 149 77 156 100% 49% 34% 29% 27% 52% 51% 51% 33% 34% 37% 50% 12% 46% 15% 37% 38% 19% 39%**D/S (AGREE - DISAGREE) 241 113 91 77 64 124 131 111 71 87 88 126 27 135 24 78 103 35 92 61% 59% 67% 66% 59% 60% 65% 55% 54% 65% 59% 64% 55% 75% 41% 53% 69% 45% 59%TOTAL AGREE 319 153 113 97 86 165 167 156 101 110 118 162 38 158 41 113 126 56 124----------- 80% 79% 84% 83% 80% 80% 82% 78% 77% 83% 80% 82% 78% 87% 71% 76% 85% 73% 79%TOTAL DISAGREE 78 40 22 20 22 41 36 45 30 23 30 36 11 23 17 35 23 21 32-------------- 20% 21% 16% 17% 20% 20% 18% 22% 23% 17% 20% 18% 22% 13% 29% 24% 15% 27% 21% STRONGLY AGREE 176 96 75 61 57 99 91 88 53 62 78 84 13 108 15 51 89 24 58 44% 50% 56% 52% 53% 48% 45% 44% 40% 47% 53% 42% 27% 60% 26% 34% 60% 31% 37% SOMEWHAT AGREE 143 57 38 36 29 66 76 68 48 48 40 78 25 50 26 62 37 32 66 36% 30% 28% 31% 27% 32% 37% 34% 37% 36% 27% 39% 51% 28% 45% 42% 25% 42% 42% SOMEWHAT DISAGREE 49 24 15 14 14 29 22 28 20 16 22 24 2 16 8 22 15 12 20 12% 12% 11% 12% 13% 14% 11% 14% 15% 12% 15% 12% 4% 9% 14% 15% 10% 16% 13% STRONGLY DISAGREE 29 16 7 6 8 12 14 17 10 7 8 12 9 7 9 13 8 9 12 7% 8% 5% 5% 7% 6% 7% 8% 8% 5% 5% 6% 18% 4% 16% 9% 5% 12% 8% P U B L I C O P I N I O N S T R A T E G I E S
    • WORKPLACE WELLNESS INITIATIVES STUDY / 12430 / SEPTEMBER 2012 PAGE 132Table 44-3QUESTION 35:Please select if you AGREE or DISAGREE with the following statements. My organization would be interested in creating or expanding a worksite wellness initiative if:The state and federal government provided tax incentives for these initiatives.BANNER 3 ------------------- AMONG THOSE WITH WELLNESS INITIATIVE --------------------- HAVE WELLNESS % OF YEARS FINANCIAL EMPLOYEE ACCESS INITATIVE OPERATING BUDGET IN OPERATION INCENTIVE ROI TO INITIATIVE =========== ================= ================= =========== =========== ================== 6% OR 1-2 3-4 5+ TOTAL YES NO 0-1% 2-5% MORE YRS YRS YRS YES NO YES NO 0-74% 75-84% 85%+ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ -----BASE=TOTAL ASKED 397 218 179 78 64 25 70 43 89 111 107 90 122 19 13 170 100% 55% 45% 36% 29% 11% 32% 20% 41% 51% 49% 41% 56% 9% 6% 78%**D/S (AGREE - DISAGREE) 241 118 123 38 30 19 34 23 49 57 61 48 64 9 3 94 61% 54% 69% 49% 47% 76% 49% 53% 55% 51% 57% 53% 52% 47% 23% 55%TOTAL AGREE 319 168 151 58 47 22 52 33 69 84 84 69 93 14 8 132----------- 80% 77% 84% 74% 73% 88% 74% 77% 78% 76% 79% 77% 76% 74% 62% 78%TOTAL DISAGREE 78 50 28 20 17 3 18 10 20 27 23 21 29 5 5 38-------------- 20% 23% 16% 26% 27% 12% 26% 23% 22% 24% 21% 23% 24% 26% 38% 22% STRONGLY AGREE 176 99 77 38 23 14 33 25 33 56 43 45 51 9 7 75 44% 45% 43% 49% 36% 56% 47% 58% 37% 50% 40% 50% 42% 47% 54% 44% SOMEWHAT AGREE 143 69 74 20 24 8 19 8 36 28 41 24 42 5 1 57 36% 32% 41% 26% 38% 32% 27% 19% 40% 25% 38% 27% 34% 26% 8% 34% SOMEWHAT DISAGREE 49 31 18 10 10 3 10 6 14 16 15 13 18 3 2 25 12% 14% 10% 13% 16% 12% 14% 14% 16% 14% 14% 14% 15% 16% 15% 15% STRONGLY DISAGREE 29 19 10 10 7 - 8 4 6 11 8 8 11 2 3 13 7% 9% 6% 13% 11% - 11% 9% 7% 10% 7% 9% 9% 11% 23% 8% P U B L I C O P I N I O N S T R A T E G I E S
    • WORKPLACE WELLNESS INITIATIVES STUDY / 12430 / SEPTEMBER 2012 PAGE 133Table 45-1QUESTION 36:Does your organization track the return on investment [ROI] of its worksite wellness initiatives?BANNER 1 ORG HEALTH ORGANIZATION SIZE PROFIT STATUS REGION EMPLOYEES W/ CARE YEARS IN OPERATION GRADE ================= ================= ======================= ================== ======================= =========== NON- 100- PRIV- PUB- PROF/ NORTH MID- 0-10 11-20 21-50 51+ TOTAL 1-99 499 500+ ATE LIC GOVT -EAST SOUTH WEST WEST 0-74% 75-84% 85%+ YRS YRS YRS YRS A/B C/D/F ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----BASE=TOTAL ASKED 214 30 61 123 89 57 68 29 67 77 41 48 41 95 13 21 75 94 121 92 100% 14% 29% 57% 42% 27% 32% 14% 31% 36% 19% 22% 19% 44% 6% 10% 35% 44% 57% 43%**D/S (YES - NO) -34 -12 -41 19 -25 13 -22 -1 -13 -21 1 -8 -1 -13 -7 -13 -13 4 -19 -16 -16% -40% -67% 15% -28% 23% -32% -3% -19% -27% 2% -17% -2% -14% -54% -62% -17% 4% -16% -17%YES 90 9 10 71 32 35 23 14 27 28 21 20 20 41 3 4 31 49 51 38 42% 30% 16% 58% 36% 61% 34% 48% 40% 36% 51% 42% 49% 43% 23% 19% 41% 52% 42% 41%NO 124 21 51 52 57 22 45 15 40 49 20 28 21 54 10 17 44 45 70 54 58% 70% 84% 42% 64% 39% 66% 52% 60% 64% 49% 58% 51% 57% 77% 81% 59% 48% 58% 59% P U B L I C O P I N I O N S T R A T E G I E S
    • WORKPLACE WELLNESS INITIATIVES STUDY / 12430 / SEPTEMBER 2012 PAGE 134Table 45-2QUESTION 36:Does your organization track the return on investment [ROI] of its worksite wellness initiatives?BANNER 2 WELLNESS ROLE OF IMPORTANT ISSUES (%10) HEALTH CONCERNS (COMBINED) - BENEFICIAL STATE/LOCAL GOVT ROLE OF FED GOVT ======================== =============================== ================= ================= ================= DECR LACK HIGH NOT INSU- PROD- WORK- OBES- STRESS OF CHRON BLOOD VERY/ MORE LESS NO MORE LESS NO RANCE UCTI- ABSEN- ERS ITY/ /MEN- FIT- DIS- PRE- AT ACT- ACT- CHAN- ACT- ACT- CHAN- TOTAL COSTS VITY TEEISM COMP WEIGHT TAL NESS EASE SSURE VERY SMWT ALL IVE IVE GE IVE IVE GE ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ------ ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----BASE=TOTAL ASKED 214 106 76 67 62 122 113 107 67 79 107 90 16 105 28 74 88 37 79 100% 50% 36% 31% 29% 57% 53% 50% 31% 37% 50% 42% 7% 49% 13% 35% 41% 17% 37%**D/S (YES - NO) -34 -12 - 5 4 -10 -17 -19 -13 -13 -5 -20 -8 -17 2 -16 -4 -1 -27 -16% -11% - 7% 6% -8% -15% -18% -19% -16% -5% -22% -50% -16% 7% -22% -5% -3% -34%YES 90 47 38 36 33 56 48 44 27 33 51 35 4 44 15 29 42 18 26 42% 44% 50% 54% 53% 46% 42% 41% 40% 42% 48% 39% 25% 42% 54% 39% 48% 49% 33%NO 124 59 38 31 29 66 65 63 40 46 56 55 12 61 13 45 46 19 53 58% 56% 50% 46% 47% 54% 58% 59% 60% 58% 52% 61% 75% 58% 46% 61% 52% 51% 67% P U B L I C O P I N I O N S T R A T E G I E S
    • WORKPLACE WELLNESS INITIATIVES STUDY / 12430 / SEPTEMBER 2012 PAGE 135Table 45-3QUESTION 36:Does your organization track the return on investment [ROI] of its worksite wellness initiatives?BANNER 3 ------------------- AMONG THOSE WITH WELLNESS INITIATIVE --------------------- HAVE WELLNESS % OF YEARS FINANCIAL EMPLOYEE ACCESS INITATIVE OPERATING BUDGET IN OPERATION INCENTIVE ROI TO INITIATIVE =========== ================= ================= =========== =========== ================== 6% OR 1-2 3-4 5+ TOTAL YES NO 0-1% 2-5% MORE YRS YRS YRS YES NO YES NO 0-74% 75-84% 85%+ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ -----BASE=TOTAL ASKED 214 214 - 77 63 24 70 42 86 109 105 90 124 19 13 166 100% 100% - 36% 29% 11% 33% 20% 40% 51% 49% 42% 58% 9% 6% 78%**D/S (YES - NO) -34 -34 - -39 9 6 -8 -6 -14 15 -49 90 -124 1 -1 -30 -16% -16% - -51% 14% 25% -11% -14% -16% 14% -47% 100% -100% 5% -8% -18%YES 90 90 - 19 36 15 31 18 36 62 28 90 - 10 6 68 42% 42% - 25% 57% 63% 44% 43% 42% 57% 27% 100% - 53% 46% 41%NO 124 124 - 58 27 9 39 24 50 47 77 - 124 9 7 98 58% 58% - 75% 43% 38% 56% 57% 58% 43% 73% - 100% 47% 54% 59% P U B L I C O P I N I O N S T R A T E G I E S
    • WORKPLACE WELLNESS INITIATIVES STUDY / 12430 / SEPTEMBER 2012 PAGE 136Table 46-1QUESTION 37:How important is it to your organization to have a measureable ROI [return on investment] one to three years from now in order to determine the value of worksite wellnessinitiatives?BANNER 1 ORG HEALTH ORGANIZATION SIZE PROFIT STATUS REGION EMPLOYEES W/ CARE YEARS IN OPERATION GRADE ================= ================= ======================= ================== ======================= =========== NON- 100- PRIV- PUB- PROF/ NORTH MID- 0-10 11-20 21-50 51+ TOTAL 1-99 499 500+ ATE LIC GOVT -EAST SOUTH WEST WEST 0-74% 75-84% 85%+ YRS YRS YRS YRS A/B C/D/F ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----BASE=TOTAL ASKED 218 30 63 125 91 56 71 29 68 79 42 48 41 98 13 22 75 94 123 94 100% 14% 29% 57% 42% 26% 33% 13% 31% 36% 19% 22% 19% 45% 6% 10% 34% 43% 56% 43%**D/S (IMPORTANT - NOT 150 14 33 103 59 52 39 21 44 57 28 36 31 64 13 16 57 54 73 76 IMPORTANT) 69% 47% 52% 82% 65% 93% 55% 72% 65% 72% 67% 75% 76% 65% 100% 73% 76% 57% 59% 81%TOTAL IMPORTANT 184 22 48 114 75 54 55 25 56 68 35 42 36 81 13 19 66 74 98 85--------------- 84% 73% 76% 91% 82% 96% 77% 86% 82% 86% 83% 88% 88% 83% 100% 86% 88% 79% 80% 90%TOTAL NOT IMPORTANT 34 8 15 11 16 2 16 4 12 11 7 6 5 17 - 3 9 20 25 9------------------- 16% 27% 24% 9% 18% 4% 23% 14% 18% 14% 17% 13% 12% 17% - 14% 12% 21% 20% 10% VERY IMPORTANT 90 8 16 66 37 30 23 12 24 32 22 19 20 40 5 11 26 41 46 43 41% 27% 25% 53% 41% 54% 32% 41% 35% 41% 52% 40% 49% 41% 38% 50% 35% 44% 37% 46% SOMEWHAT IMPORTANT 94 14 32 48 38 24 32 13 32 36 13 23 16 41 8 8 40 33 52 42 43% 47% 51% 38% 42% 43% 45% 45% 47% 46% 31% 48% 39% 42% 62% 36% 53% 35% 42% 45% NOT THAT IMPORTANT 31 6 14 11 14 2 15 4 12 8 7 5 5 16 - 3 8 18 23 8 14% 20% 22% 9% 15% 4% 21% 14% 18% 10% 17% 10% 12% 16% - 14% 11% 19% 19% 9% NOT IMPORTANT AT ALL 3 2 1 - 2 - 1 - - 3 - 1 - 1 - - 1 2 2 1 1% 7% 2% - 2% - 1% - - 4% - 2% - 1% - - 1% 2% 2% 1% P U B L I C O P I N I O N S T R A T E G I E S
    • WORKPLACE WELLNESS INITIATIVES STUDY / 12430 / SEPTEMBER 2012 PAGE 137Table 46-2QUESTION 37:How important is it to your organization to have a measureable ROI [return on investment] one to three years from now in order to determine the value of worksite wellnessinitiatives?BANNER 2 WELLNESS ROLE OF IMPORTANT ISSUES (%10) HEALTH CONCERNS (COMBINED) - BENEFICIAL STATE/LOCAL GOVT ROLE OF FED GOVT ======================== =============================== ================= ================= ================= DECR LACK HIGH NOT INSU- PROD- WORK- OBES- STRESS OF CHRON BLOOD VERY/ MORE LESS NO MORE LESS NO RANCE UCTI- ABSEN- ERS ITY/ /MEN- FIT- DIS- PRE- AT ACT- ACT- CHAN- ACT- ACT- CHAN- TOTAL COSTS VITY TEEISM COMP WEIGHT TAL NESS EASE SSURE VERY SMWT ALL IVE IVE GE IVE IVE GE ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ------ ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----BASE=TOTAL ASKED 218 110 78 69 65 126 116 110 68 79 109 92 16 107 28 75 90 37 81 100% 50% 36% 32% 30% 58% 53% 50% 31% 36% 50% 42% 7% 49% 13% 34% 41% 17% 37%**D/S (IMPORTANT - NOT 150 84 52 41 47 86 76 74 44 61 81 64 4 75 24 49 74 25 47 IMPORTANT) 69% 76% 67% 59% 72% 68% 66% 67% 65% 77% 74% 70% 25% 70% 86% 65% 82% 68% 58%TOTAL IMPORTANT 184 97 65 55 56 106 96 92 56 70 95 78 10 91 26 62 82 31 64--------------- 84% 88% 83% 80% 86% 84% 83% 84% 82% 89% 87% 85% 63% 85% 93% 83% 91% 84% 79%TOTAL NOT IMPORTANT 34 13 13 14 9 20 20 18 12 9 14 14 6 16 2 13 8 6 17------------------- 16% 12% 17% 20% 14% 16% 17% 16% 18% 11% 13% 15% 38% 15% 7% 17% 9% 16% 21% VERY IMPORTANT 90 50 37 40 36 53 49 42 28 32 50 35 4 50 11 28 44 14 28 41% 45% 47% 58% 55% 42% 42% 38% 41% 41% 46% 38% 25% 47% 39% 37% 49% 38% 35% SOMEWHAT IMPORTANT 94 47 28 15 20 53 47 50 28 38 45 43 6 41 15 34 38 17 36 43% 43% 36% 22% 31% 42% 41% 45% 41% 48% 41% 47% 38% 38% 54% 45% 42% 46% 44% NOT THAT IMPORTANT 31 12 12 12 9 19 18 18 9 7 14 12 5 15 2 11 8 6 14 14% 11% 15% 17% 14% 15% 16% 16% 13% 9% 13% 13% 31% 14% 7% 15% 9% 16% 17% NOT IMPORTANT AT ALL 3 1 1 2 - 1 2 - 3 2 - 2 1 1 - 2 - - 3 1% 1% 1% 3% - 1% 2% - 4% 3% - 2% 6% 1% - 3% - - 4% P U B L I C O P I N I O N S T R A T E G I E S
    • WORKPLACE WELLNESS INITIATIVES STUDY / 12430 / SEPTEMBER 2012 PAGE 138Table 46-3QUESTION 37:How important is it to your organization to have a measureable ROI [return on investment] one to three years from now in order to determine the value of worksite wellnessinitiatives?BANNER 3 ------------------- AMONG THOSE WITH WELLNESS INITIATIVE --------------------- HAVE WELLNESS % OF YEARS FINANCIAL EMPLOYEE ACCESS INITATIVE OPERATING BUDGET IN OPERATION INCENTIVE ROI TO INITIATIVE =========== ================= ================= =========== =========== ================== 6% OR 1-2 3-4 5+ TOTAL YES NO 0-1% 2-5% MORE YRS YRS YRS YES NO YES NO 0-74% 75-84% 85%+ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ -----BASE=TOTAL ASKED 218 218 - 77 63 25 72 42 88 111 107 90 123 19 13 169 100% 100% - 35% 29% 11% 33% 19% 40% 51% 49% 41% 56% 9% 6% 78%**D/S (IMPORTANT - NOT 150 150 - 39 43 23 56 30 50 87 63 84 61 15 13 111 IMPORTANT) 69% 69% - 51% 68% 92% 78% 71% 57% 78% 59% 93% 50% 79% 100% 66%TOTAL IMPORTANT 184 184 - 58 53 24 64 36 69 99 85 87 92 17 13 140--------------- 84% 84% - 75% 84% 96% 89% 86% 78% 89% 79% 97% 75% 89% 100% 83%TOTAL NOT IMPORTANT 34 34 - 19 10 1 8 6 19 12 22 3 31 2 - 29------------------- 16% 16% - 25% 16% 4% 11% 14% 22% 11% 21% 3% 25% 11% - 17% VERY IMPORTANT 90 90 - 24 28 15 30 18 36 54 36 62 25 7 6 70 41% 41% - 31% 44% 60% 42% 43% 41% 49% 34% 69% 20% 37% 46% 41% SOMEWHAT IMPORTANT 94 94 - 34 25 9 34 18 33 45 49 25 67 10 7 70 43% 43% - 44% 40% 36% 47% 43% 38% 41% 46% 28% 54% 53% 54% 41% NOT THAT IMPORTANT 31 31 - 17 9 1 8 6 16 11 20 3 28 1 - 27 14% 14% - 22% 14% 4% 11% 14% 18% 10% 19% 3% 23% 5% - 16% NOT IMPORTANT AT ALL 3 3 - 2 1 - - - 3 1 2 - 3 1 - 2 1% 1% - 3% 2% - - - 3% 1% 2% - 2% 5% - 1% P U B L I C O P I N I O N S T R A T E G I E S
    • WORKPLACE WELLNESS INITIATIVES STUDY / 12430 / SEPTEMBER 2012 PAGE 139Table 47-1QUESTION 38:Regardless of whether you have a worksite wellness initiative at your organization or not, what are some of the reasons why organizations like yours often decide NOT to offera worksite wellness initiative? Select as many as apply.BANNER 1 ORG HEALTH ORGANIZATION SIZE PROFIT STATUS REGION EMPLOYEES W/ CARE YEARS IN OPERATION GRADE ================= ================= ======================= ================== ======================= =========== NON- 100- PRIV- PUB- PROF/ NORTH MID- 0-10 11-20 21-50 51+ TOTAL 1-99 499 500+ ATE LIC GOVT -EAST SOUTH WEST WEST 0-74% 75-84% 85%+ YRS YRS YRS YRS A/B C/D/F ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----BASE=TOTAL ASKED 391 110 120 161 205 74 112 61 122 135 73 108 78 167 45 61 143 131 225 164 100% 28% 31% 41% 52% 19% 29% 16% 31% 35% 19% 28% 20% 43% 12% 16% 37% 34% 58% 42%COST OF THE INITIATIVE 254 57 88 109 131 53 70 41 79 90 44 68 59 106 23 40 99 85 138 114 65% 52% 73% 68% 64% 72% 63% 67% 65% 67% 60% 63% 76% 63% 51% 66% 69% 65% 61% 70%LACK OF EMPLOYEE INTEREST/ 232 63 71 98 118 50 64 34 79 83 36 66 51 98 22 37 87 83 127 104EXPECTED LOW LEVELS OF 59% 57% 59% 61% 58% 68% 57% 56% 65% 61% 49% 61% 65% 59% 49% 61% 61% 63% 56% 63%PARTICIPATIONLACK OF TIME 210 63 67 80 108 32 70 34 64 72 40 61 40 87 26 30 76 71 119 90 54% 57% 56% 50% 53% 43% 63% 56% 52% 53% 55% 56% 51% 52% 58% 49% 53% 54% 53% 55%MANAGEMENT DOES NOT SEE THE 175 39 51 85 90 39 46 31 55 62 27 45 39 76 15 27 72 58 96 77VALUE OF IT 45% 35% 43% 53% 44% 53% 41% 51% 45% 46% 37% 42% 50% 46% 33% 44% 50% 44% 43% 47%EMPLOYEES DO NOT SEE THE 164 48 51 65 84 32 48 25 53 60 26 44 37 69 18 26 60 60 87 76VALUE OF IT 42% 44% 43% 40% 41% 43% 43% 41% 43% 44% 36% 41% 47% 41% 40% 43% 42% 46% 39% 46%LACKING EXPERTISE/STAFF 152 41 43 68 83 23 46 19 50 54 29 44 34 60 15 22 58 52 83 68 39% 37% 36% 42% 40% 31% 41% 31% 41% 40% 40% 41% 44% 36% 33% 36% 41% 40% 37% 41%LACK OF INFORMATION/ 140 36 42 62 76 26 38 19 41 47 33 39 30 57 19 18 50 49 76 63RESOURCES ABOUT HOW TO 36% 33% 35% 39% 37% 35% 34% 31% 34% 35% 45% 36% 38% 34% 42% 30% 35% 37% 34% 38%DEVELOP AND MAINTAIN ANINITIATIVELACK OF FACILITIES 137 45 38 54 69 27 41 24 40 51 22 29 27 69 16 22 49 48 78 58 35% 41% 32% 34% 34% 36% 37% 39% 33% 38% 30% 27% 35% 41% 36% 36% 34% 37% 35% 35%UNABLE TO FIND SOMEONE WHO 133 31 39 63 65 20 48 19 37 57 20 42 28 55 10 17 51 51 75 57WILL CHAMPION THE 34% 28% 33% 39% 32% 27% 43% 31% 30% 42% 27% 39% 36% 33% 22% 28% 36% 39% 33% 35%INITIATIVEORGANIZATION IS TOO SMALL 109 53 26 30 67 16 26 17 28 43 21 27 22 48 18 19 31 38 71 38 28% 48% 22% 19% 33% 22% 23% 28% 23% 32% 29% 25% 28% 29% 40% 31% 22% 29% 32% 23%WOULD NOT REDUCE HEALTH 101 30 23 48 50 22 29 11 27 37 26 29 22 41 8 17 42 30 63 38INSURANCE COSTS 26% 27% 19% 30% 24% 30% 26% 18% 22% 27% 36% 27% 28% 25% 18% 28% 29% 23% 28% 23%HIGH EMPLOYEE TURNOVER 42 7 15 20 27 7 8 6 15 20 1 22 5 11 2 5 23 10 19 22 11% 6% 13% 12% 13% 9% 7% 10% 12% 15% 1% 20% 6% 7% 4% 8% 16% 8% 8% 13%SOMETHING ELSE 10 2 3 5 5 3 2 1 5 3 1 1 2 6 2 - 3 5 5 5 3% 2% 3% 3% 2% 4% 2% 2% 4% 2% 1% 1% 3% 4% 4% - 2% 4% 2% 3% P U B L I C O P I N I O N S T R A T E G I E S
    • WORKPLACE WELLNESS INITIATIVES STUDY / 12430 / SEPTEMBER 2012 PAGE 140Table 47-2QUESTION 38:Regardless of whether you have a worksite wellness initiative at your organization or not, what are some of the reasons why organizations like yours often decide NOT to offera worksite wellness initiative? Select as many as apply.BANNER 2 WELLNESS ROLE OF IMPORTANT ISSUES (%10) HEALTH CONCERNS (COMBINED) - BENEFICIAL STATE/LOCAL GOVT ROLE OF FED GOVT ======================== =============================== ================= ================= ================= DECR LACK HIGH NOT INSU- PROD- WORK- OBES- STRESS OF CHRON BLOOD VERY/ MORE LESS NO MORE LESS NO RANCE UCTI- ABSEN- ERS ITY/ /MEN- FIT- DIS- PRE- AT ACT- ACT- CHAN- ACT- ACT- CHAN- TOTAL COSTS VITY TEEISM COMP WEIGHT TAL NESS EASE SSURE VERY SMWT ALL IVE IVE GE IVE IVE GE ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ------ ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----BASE=TOTAL ASKED 391 188 134 114 104 205 201 200 127 129 145 194 50 181 59 144 149 78 153 100% 48% 34% 29% 27% 52% 51% 51% 32% 33% 37% 50% 13% 46% 15% 37% 38% 20% 39%COST OF THE INITIATIVE 254 119 81 70 69 139 134 125 82 90 93 129 31 124 34 93 108 44 96 65% 63% 60% 61% 66% 68% 67% 63% 65% 70% 64% 66% 62% 69% 58% 65% 72% 56% 63%LACK OF EMPLOYEE INTEREST/ 232 106 79 65 65 125 116 121 79 74 77 126 28 111 35 84 85 48 95EXPECTED LOW LEVELS OF 59% 56% 59% 57% 63% 61% 58% 61% 62% 57% 53% 65% 56% 61% 59% 58% 57% 62% 62%PARTICIPATIONLACK OF TIME 210 98 60 56 46 106 111 110 78 66 71 111 27 92 38 79 71 50 84 54% 52% 45% 49% 44% 52% 55% 55% 61% 51% 49% 57% 54% 51% 64% 55% 48% 64% 55%MANAGEMENT DOES NOT SEE THE 175 81 55 51 37 98 90 81 66 66 66 87 22 73 28 71 64 36 72VALUE OF IT 45% 43% 41% 45% 36% 48% 45% 41% 52% 51% 46% 45% 44% 40% 47% 49% 43% 46% 47%EMPLOYEES DO NOT SEE THE 164 73 54 47 46 86 80 82 55 50 47 90 25 71 27 64 57 32 72VALUE OF IT 42% 39% 40% 41% 44% 42% 40% 41% 43% 39% 32% 46% 50% 39% 46% 44% 38% 41% 47%LACKING EXPERTISE/STAFF 152 79 56 44 43 85 74 79 55 44 55 78 18 68 25 58 59 34 55 39% 42% 42% 39% 41% 41% 37% 40% 43% 34% 38% 40% 36% 38% 42% 40% 40% 44% 36%LACK OF INFORMATION/ 140 68 52 42 39 71 72 71 49 47 56 64 19 70 16 53 58 25 52RESOURCES ABOUT HOW TO 36% 36% 39% 37% 38% 35% 36% 36% 39% 36% 39% 33% 38% 39% 27% 37% 39% 32% 34%DEVELOP AND MAINTAIN ANINITIATIVELACK OF FACILITIES 137 61 45 42 29 75 71 74 48 41 37 80 20 63 24 49 47 31 56 35% 32% 34% 37% 28% 37% 35% 37% 38% 32% 26% 41% 40% 35% 41% 34% 32% 40% 37%UNABLE TO FIND SOMEONE WHO 133 70 47 37 37 74 78 68 46 48 54 62 17 62 15 54 53 21 55WILL CHAMPION THE 34% 37% 35% 32% 36% 36% 39% 34% 36% 37% 37% 32% 34% 34% 25% 38% 36% 27% 36%INITIATIVEORGANIZATION IS TOO SMALL 109 43 27 29 23 55 51 50 33 34 30 54 23 41 21 45 37 30 39 28% 23% 20% 25% 22% 27% 25% 25% 26% 26% 21% 28% 46% 23% 36% 31% 25% 38% 25%WOULD NOT REDUCE HEALTH 101 42 31 23 25 53 54 47 40 31 33 52 16 44 13 40 40 16 40INSURANCE COSTS 26% 22% 23% 20% 24% 26% 27% 24% 31% 24% 23% 27% 32% 24% 22% 28% 27% 21% 26%HIGH EMPLOYEE TURNOVER 42 20 11 11 12 27 21 20 15 13 13 24 5 16 11 14 16 11 15 11% 11% 8% 10% 12% 13% 10% 10% 12% 10% 9% 12% 10% 9% 19% 10% 11% 14% 10%SOMETHING ELSE 10 8 4 3 2 8 - 4 3 7 5 3 2 5 2 3 4 3 3 3% 4% 3% 3% 2% 4% - 2% 2% 5% 3% 2% 4% 3% 3% 2% 3% 4% 2% P U B L I C O P I N I O N S T R A T E G I E S
    • WORKPLACE WELLNESS INITIATIVES STUDY / 12430 / SEPTEMBER 2012 PAGE 141Table 47-3QUESTION 38:Regardless of whether you have a worksite wellness initiative at your organization or not, what are some of the reasons why organizations like yours often decide NOT to offera worksite wellness initiative? Select as many as apply.BANNER 3 ------------------- AMONG THOSE WITH WELLNESS INITIATIVE --------------------- HAVE WELLNESS % OF YEARS FINANCIAL EMPLOYEE ACCESS INITATIVE OPERATING BUDGET IN OPERATION INCENTIVE ROI TO INITIATIVE =========== ================= ================= =========== =========== ================== 6% OR 1-2 3-4 5+ TOTAL YES NO 0-1% 2-5% MORE YRS YRS YRS YES NO YES NO 0-74% 75-84% 85%+ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ -----BASE=TOTAL ASKED 391 209 182 76 63 22 69 41 84 104 104 86 117 19 13 167 100% 53% 47% 36% 30% 11% 33% 20% 40% 50% 50% 41% 56% 9% 6% 80%COST OF THE INITIATIVE 254 141 113 52 45 16 44 30 58 77 63 57 81 11 9 113 65% 67% 62% 68% 71% 73% 64% 73% 69% 74% 61% 66% 69% 58% 69% 68%LACK OF EMPLOYEE INTEREST/ 232 128 104 48 39 15 46 28 49 65 63 56 69 10 10 103EXPECTED LOW LEVELS OF 59% 61% 57% 63% 62% 68% 67% 68% 58% 63% 61% 65% 59% 53% 77% 62%PARTICIPATIONLACK OF TIME 210 107 103 46 25 10 38 22 42 53 53 40 66 12 8 81 54% 51% 57% 61% 40% 45% 55% 54% 50% 51% 51% 47% 56% 63% 62% 49%MANAGEMENT DOES NOT SEE THE 175 104 71 47 29 12 29 27 44 61 43 46 58 13 6 80VALUE OF IT 45% 50% 39% 62% 46% 55% 42% 66% 52% 59% 41% 53% 50% 68% 46% 48%EMPLOYEES DO NOT SEE THE 164 90 74 34 29 9 24 23 38 50 40 42 47 6 8 72VALUE OF IT 42% 43% 41% 45% 46% 41% 35% 56% 45% 48% 38% 49% 40% 32% 62% 43%LACKING EXPERTISE/STAFF 152 81 71 27 25 10 23 18 36 45 36 35 44 9 6 62 39% 39% 39% 36% 40% 45% 33% 44% 43% 43% 35% 41% 38% 47% 46% 37%LACK OF INFORMATION/ 140 73 67 26 26 7 23 16 29 41 31 32 39 8 5 54RESOURCES ABOUT HOW TO 36% 35% 37% 34% 41% 32% 33% 39% 35% 39% 30% 37% 33% 42% 38% 32%DEVELOP AND MAINTAIN ANINITIATIVELACK OF FACILITIES 137 63 74 22 23 9 19 14 28 30 33 21 39 6 2 53 35% 30% 41% 29% 37% 41% 28% 34% 33% 29% 32% 24% 33% 32% 15% 32%UNABLE TO FIND SOMEONE WHO 133 71 62 27 20 7 21 15 31 40 31 31 39 9 5 54WILL CHAMPION THE 34% 34% 34% 36% 32% 32% 30% 37% 37% 38% 30% 36% 33% 47% 38% 32%INITIATIVEORGANIZATION IS TOO SMALL 109 50 59 20 12 7 15 10 23 24 25 24 24 5 4 38 28% 24% 32% 26% 19% 32% 22% 24% 27% 23% 24% 28% 21% 26% 31% 23%WOULD NOT REDUCE HEALTH 101 57 44 22 14 5 20 14 19 29 27 27 27 7 3 43INSURANCE COSTS 26% 27% 24% 29% 22% 23% 29% 34% 23% 28% 26% 31% 23% 37% 23% 26%HIGH EMPLOYEE TURNOVER 42 21 21 6 4 2 6 7 6 15 6 11 9 1 2 17 11% 10% 12% 8% 6% 9% 9% 17% 7% 14% 6% 13% 8% 5% 15% 10%SOMETHING ELSE 10 3 7 1 1 - 1 2 - 3 - 2 1 - - 3 3% 1% 4% 1% 2% - 1% 5% - 3% - 2% 1% - - 2% P U B L I C O P I N I O N S T R A T E G I E S
    • WORKPLACE WELLNESS INITIATIVES STUDY / 12430 / SEPTEMBER 2012 PAGE 142Table 48-1QUESTION 39:Which of the following would you consider to be TRUSTED and VALUED sources of information about creating or expanding a worksite wellness initiative for your organization?BANNER 1 ORG HEALTH ORGANIZATION SIZE PROFIT STATUS REGION EMPLOYEES W/ CARE YEARS IN OPERATION GRADE ================= ================= ======================= ================== ======================= =========== NON- 100- PRIV- PUB- PROF/ NORTH MID- 0-10 11-20 21-50 51+ TOTAL 1-99 499 500+ ATE LIC GOVT -EAST SOUTH WEST WEST 0-74% 75-84% 85%+ YRS YRS YRS YRS A/B C/D/F ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----BASE=TOTAL ASKED 394 110 118 166 204 76 114 61 122 138 73 108 79 166 44 60 141 134 229 163 100% 28% 30% 42% 52% 19% 29% 15% 31% 35% 19% 27% 20% 42% 11% 15% 36% 34% 58% 41%BUSINESS PEERS OR FELLOW 229 62 72 95 123 43 63 31 68 86 44 64 40 105 22 37 87 78 129 98HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGERS 58% 56% 61% 57% 60% 57% 55% 51% 56% 62% 60% 59% 51% 63% 50% 62% 62% 58% 56% 60%HEALTH CARE SERVICE 218 56 62 100 110 50 58 29 63 90 36 60 45 98 19 34 79 78 135 81PROVIDERS 55% 51% 53% 60% 54% 66% 51% 48% 52% 65% 49% 56% 57% 59% 43% 57% 56% 58% 59% 50%WORKSITE WELLNESS VENDORS 214 45 71 98 111 45 58 28 70 78 38 60 45 88 25 32 72 77 121 91AND CONSULTANTS 54% 41% 60% 59% 54% 59% 51% 46% 57% 57% 52% 56% 57% 53% 57% 53% 51% 57% 53% 56%HEALTH CARE INSURERS 191 48 65 78 103 37 51 33 48 79 31 64 29 81 17 27 74 69 103 87 48% 44% 55% 47% 50% 49% 45% 54% 39% 57% 42% 59% 37% 49% 39% 45% 52% 51% 45% 53%STATE AND LOCAL HEALTH 152 41 46 65 73 29 50 27 44 55 26 46 27 63 16 24 59 47 83 68DEPARTMENTS 39% 37% 39% 39% 36% 38% 44% 44% 36% 40% 36% 43% 34% 38% 36% 40% 42% 35% 36% 42%NON-PROFIT HEALTH 147 42 46 59 66 24 57 28 38 58 23 46 27 60 14 19 59 51 90 57ORGANIZATIONS 37% 38% 39% 36% 32% 32% 50% 46% 31% 42% 32% 43% 34% 36% 32% 32% 42% 38% 39% 35%ONLINE RESOURCES 133 41 38 54 73 20 40 23 44 44 22 45 26 43 13 23 45 45 79 53 34% 37% 32% 33% 36% 26% 35% 38% 36% 32% 30% 42% 33% 26% 30% 38% 32% 34% 34% 33%BUSINESS ORGANIZATIONS AND 104 23 30 51 46 22 36 15 30 42 17 22 23 47 6 14 37 43 58 45TRADE ASSOCIATIONS 26% 21% 25% 31% 23% 29% 32% 25% 25% 30% 23% 20% 29% 28% 14% 23% 26% 32% 25% 28%SOMETHING ELSE 3 - 2 1 2 - 1 1 2 - - - 2 1 - 1 - 1 2 1 1% - 2% 1% 1% - 1% 2% 2% - - - 3% 1% - 2% - 1% 1% 1% P U B L I C O P I N I O N S T R A T E G I E S
    • WORKPLACE WELLNESS INITIATIVES STUDY / 12430 / SEPTEMBER 2012 PAGE 143Table 48-2QUESTION 39:Which of the following would you consider to be TRUSTED and VALUED sources of information about creating or expanding a worksite wellness initiative for your organization?BANNER 2 WELLNESS ROLE OF IMPORTANT ISSUES (%10) HEALTH CONCERNS (COMBINED) - BENEFICIAL STATE/LOCAL GOVT ROLE OF FED GOVT ======================== =============================== ================= ================= ================= DECR LACK HIGH NOT INSU- PROD- WORK- OBES- STRESS OF CHRON BLOOD VERY/ MORE LESS NO MORE LESS NO RANCE UCTI- ABSEN- ERS ITY/ /MEN- FIT- DIS- PRE- AT ACT- ACT- CHAN- ACT- ACT- CHAN- TOTAL COSTS VITY TEEISM COMP WEIGHT TAL NESS EASE SSURE VERY SMWT ALL IVE IVE GE IVE IVE GE ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ------ ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----BASE=TOTAL ASKED 394 190 134 114 105 207 203 201 127 132 148 196 48 182 58 148 150 77 156 100% 48% 34% 29% 27% 53% 52% 51% 32% 34% 38% 50% 12% 46% 15% 38% 38% 20% 40%BUSINESS PEERS OR FELLOW 229 121 81 67 61 125 121 114 76 69 99 106 23 104 32 90 82 46 96HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGERS 58% 64% 60% 59% 58% 60% 60% 57% 60% 52% 67% 54% 48% 57% 55% 61% 55% 60% 62%HEALTH CARE SERVICE 218 105 78 64 65 116 110 116 66 76 91 103 23 102 30 83 81 43 88PROVIDERS 55% 55% 58% 56% 62% 56% 54% 58% 52% 58% 61% 53% 48% 56% 52% 56% 54% 56% 56%WORKSITE WELLNESS VENDORS 214 108 76 64 63 112 116 113 60 78 92 103 17 109 23 79 92 34 82AND CONSULTANTS 54% 57% 57% 56% 60% 54% 57% 56% 47% 59% 62% 53% 35% 60% 40% 53% 61% 44% 53%HEALTH CARE INSURERS 191 96 63 59 53 110 101 105 63 61 71 102 17 86 28 72 73 35 78 48% 51% 47% 52% 50% 53% 50% 52% 50% 46% 48% 52% 35% 47% 48% 49% 49% 45% 50%STATE AND LOCAL HEALTH 152 67 61 56 40 87 78 81 50 47 64 70 18 84 17 50 70 22 58DEPARTMENTS 39% 35% 46% 49% 38% 42% 38% 40% 39% 36% 43% 36% 38% 46% 29% 34% 47% 29% 37%NON-PROFIT HEALTH 147 69 49 41 40 86 76 70 55 45 58 71 18 62 26 57 54 32 60ORGANIZATIONS 37% 36% 37% 36% 38% 42% 37% 35% 43% 34% 39% 36% 38% 34% 45% 39% 36% 42% 38%ONLINE RESOURCES 133 69 42 38 34 70 79 65 40 43 58 55 20 66 16 50 57 23 49 34% 36% 31% 33% 32% 34% 39% 32% 31% 33% 39% 28% 42% 36% 28% 34% 38% 30% 31%BUSINESS ORGANIZATIONS AND 104 48 33 31 29 63 58 52 35 37 39 54 11 50 13 41 41 21 38TRADE ASSOCIATIONS 26% 25% 25% 27% 28% 30% 29% 26% 28% 28% 26% 28% 23% 27% 22% 28% 27% 27% 24%SOMETHING ELSE 3 2 2 1 1 2 1 - 1 2 1 - 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% - - 1% 2% 1% - 4% 1% 2% 1% 1% 1% 1% P U B L I C O P I N I O N S T R A T E G I E S
    • WORKPLACE WELLNESS INITIATIVES STUDY / 12430 / SEPTEMBER 2012 PAGE 144Table 48-3QUESTION 39:Which of the following would you consider to be TRUSTED and VALUED sources of information about creating or expanding a worksite wellness initiative for your organization?BANNER 3 ------------------- AMONG THOSE WITH WELLNESS INITIATIVE --------------------- HAVE WELLNESS % OF YEARS FINANCIAL EMPLOYEE ACCESS INITATIVE OPERATING BUDGET IN OPERATION INCENTIVE ROI TO INITIATIVE =========== ================= ================= =========== =========== ================== 6% OR 1-2 3-4 5+ TOTAL YES NO 0-1% 2-5% MORE YRS YRS YRS YES NO YES NO 0-74% 75-84% 85%+ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ -----BASE=TOTAL ASKED 394 215 179 78 63 23 70 41 87 109 105 89 120 19 13 170 100% 55% 45% 36% 29% 11% 33% 19% 40% 51% 49% 41% 56% 9% 6% 79%BUSINESS PEERS OR FELLOW 229 130 99 52 39 13 45 26 51 72 58 53 75 11 5 109HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGERS 58% 60% 55% 67% 62% 57% 64% 63% 59% 66% 55% 60% 63% 58% 38% 64%HEALTH CARE SERVICE 218 128 90 51 34 16 41 24 55 68 59 55 67 11 6 105PROVIDERS 55% 60% 50% 65% 54% 70% 59% 59% 63% 62% 56% 62% 56% 58% 46% 62%WORKSITE WELLNESS VENDORS 214 128 86 49 35 17 44 21 53 69 59 58 68 10 7 104AND CONSULTANTS 54% 60% 48% 63% 56% 74% 63% 51% 61% 63% 56% 65% 57% 53% 54% 61%HEALTH CARE INSURERS 191 102 89 42 25 9 33 12 49 49 52 40 58 11 3 82 48% 47% 50% 54% 40% 39% 47% 29% 56% 45% 50% 45% 48% 58% 23% 48%STATE AND LOCAL HEALTH 152 90 62 33 26 11 25 18 38 48 42 37 53 8 3 76DEPARTMENTS 39% 42% 35% 42% 41% 48% 36% 44% 44% 44% 40% 42% 44% 42% 23% 45%NON-PROFIT HEALTH 147 79 68 33 23 5 26 17 32 43 36 31 46 6 3 65ORGANIZATIONS 37% 37% 38% 42% 37% 22% 37% 41% 37% 39% 34% 35% 38% 32% 23% 38%ONLINE RESOURCES 133 77 56 28 16 11 29 13 29 35 41 29 45 8 3 58 34% 36% 31% 36% 25% 48% 41% 32% 33% 32% 39% 33% 38% 42% 23% 34%BUSINESS ORGANIZATIONS AND 104 66 38 31 14 4 17 19 25 35 31 26 37 6 3 51TRADE ASSOCIATIONS 26% 31% 21% 40% 22% 17% 24% 46% 29% 32% 30% 29% 31% 32% 23% 30%SOMETHING ELSE 3 1 2 - 1 - - 1 - 1 - 1 - - - 1 1% - 1% - 2% - - 2% - 1% - 1% - - - 1% P U B L I C O P I N I O N S T R A T E G I E S
    • WORKPLACE WELLNESS INITIATIVES STUDY / 12430 / SEPTEMBER 2012 PAGE 145Table 49-1QUESTION 40:If there was a network in your community for business leaders to learn about issues related to worksite wellness initiatives and to share information, how likely is it thatsomeone from your organization would join this network?BANNER 1 ORG HEALTH ORGANIZATION SIZE PROFIT STATUS REGION EMPLOYEES W/ CARE YEARS IN OPERATION GRADE ================= ================= ======================= ================== ======================= =========== NON- 100- PRIV- PUB- PROF/ NORTH MID- 0-10 11-20 21-50 51+ TOTAL 1-99 499 500+ ATE LIC GOVT -EAST SOUTH WEST WEST 0-74% 75-84% 85%+ YRS YRS YRS YRS A/B C/D/F ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----BASE=TOTAL ASKED 393 109 120 164 204 74 115 59 123 138 73 106 78 166 41 60 144 133 226 164 100% 28% 31% 42% 52% 19% 29% 15% 31% 35% 19% 27% 20% 42% 10% 15% 37% 34% 58% 42%**D/S (LIKELY - UNLIKELY) 189 35 70 84 98 20 71 27 49 76 37 58 36 80 27 18 62 71 106 80 48% 32% 58% 51% 48% 27% 62% 46% 40% 55% 51% 55% 46% 48% 66% 30% 43% 53% 47% 49%TOTAL LIKELY 291 72 95 124 151 47 93 43 86 107 55 82 57 123 34 39 103 102 166 122------------ 74% 66% 79% 76% 74% 64% 81% 73% 70% 78% 75% 77% 73% 74% 83% 65% 72% 77% 73% 74%TOTAL UNLIKELY 102 37 25 40 53 27 22 16 37 31 18 24 21 43 7 21 41 31 60 42-------------- 26% 34% 21% 24% 26% 36% 19% 27% 30% 22% 25% 23% 27% 26% 17% 35% 28% 23% 27% 26% VERY LIKELY 114 23 38 53 56 18 40 13 34 47 20 31 20 53 12 12 34 52 65 48 29% 21% 32% 32% 27% 24% 35% 22% 28% 34% 27% 29% 26% 32% 29% 20% 24% 39% 29% 29% SOMEWHAT LIKELY 177 49 57 71 95 29 53 30 52 60 35 51 37 70 22 27 69 50 101 74 45% 45% 48% 43% 47% 39% 46% 51% 42% 43% 48% 48% 47% 42% 54% 45% 48% 38% 45% 45% SOMEWHAT UNLIKELY 76 29 18 29 39 21 16 14 25 25 12 17 16 34 5 19 29 22 48 28 19% 27% 15% 18% 19% 28% 14% 24% 20% 18% 16% 16% 21% 20% 12% 32% 20% 17% 21% 17% VERY UNLIKELY 26 8 7 11 14 6 6 2 12 6 6 7 5 9 2 2 12 9 12 14 7% 7% 6% 7% 7% 8% 5% 3% 10% 4% 8% 7% 6% 5% 5% 3% 8% 7% 5% 9% P U B L I C O P I N I O N S T R A T E G I E S
    • WORKPLACE WELLNESS INITIATIVES STUDY / 12430 / SEPTEMBER 2012 PAGE 146Table 49-2QUESTION 40:If there was a network in your community for business leaders to learn about issues related to worksite wellness initiatives and to share information, how likely is it thatsomeone from your organization would join this network?BANNER 2 WELLNESS ROLE OF IMPORTANT ISSUES (%10) HEALTH CONCERNS (COMBINED) - BENEFICIAL STATE/LOCAL GOVT ROLE OF FED GOVT ======================== =============================== ================= ================= ================= DECR LACK HIGH NOT INSU- PROD- WORK- OBES- STRESS OF CHRON BLOOD VERY/ MORE LESS NO MORE LESS NO RANCE UCTI- ABSEN- ERS ITY/ /MEN- FIT- DIS- PRE- AT ACT- ACT- CHAN- ACT- ACT- CHAN- TOTAL COSTS VITY TEEISM COMP WEIGHT TAL NESS EASE SSURE VERY SMWT ALL IVE IVE GE IVE IVE GE ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ------ ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----BASE=TOTAL ASKED 393 189 133 112 105 207 203 199 128 131 147 196 49 181 58 147 150 76 157 100% 48% 34% 28% 27% 53% 52% 51% 33% 33% 37% 50% 12% 46% 15% 37% 38% 19% 40%**D/S (LIKELY - UNLIKELY) 189 103 75 62 55 125 99 107 44 65 101 88 1 117 8 59 88 20 75 48% 54% 56% 55% 52% 60% 49% 54% 34% 50% 69% 45% 2% 65% 14% 40% 59% 26% 48%TOTAL LIKELY 291 146 104 87 80 166 151 153 86 98 124 142 25 149 33 103 119 48 116------------ 74% 77% 78% 78% 76% 80% 74% 77% 67% 75% 84% 72% 51% 82% 57% 70% 79% 63% 74%TOTAL UNLIKELY 102 43 29 25 25 41 52 46 42 33 23 54 24 32 25 44 31 28 41-------------- 26% 23% 22% 22% 24% 20% 26% 23% 33% 25% 16% 28% 49% 18% 43% 30% 21% 37% 26% VERY LIKELY 114 61 47 39 34 75 60 62 33 42 63 46 5 68 6 39 54 11 46 29% 32% 35% 35% 32% 36% 30% 31% 26% 32% 43% 23% 10% 38% 10% 27% 36% 14% 29% SOMEWHAT LIKELY 177 85 57 48 46 91 91 91 53 56 61 96 20 81 27 64 65 37 70 45% 45% 43% 43% 44% 44% 45% 46% 41% 43% 41% 49% 41% 45% 47% 44% 43% 49% 45% SOMEWHAT UNLIKELY 76 30 22 18 16 29 39 36 32 23 15 45 15 25 18 32 22 23 29 19% 16% 17% 16% 15% 14% 19% 18% 25% 18% 10% 23% 31% 14% 31% 22% 15% 30% 18% VERY UNLIKELY 26 13 7 7 9 12 13 10 10 10 8 9 9 7 7 12 9 5 12 7% 7% 5% 6% 9% 6% 6% 5% 8% 8% 5% 5% 18% 4% 12% 8% 6% 7% 8% P U B L I C O P I N I O N S T R A T E G I E S
    • WORKPLACE WELLNESS INITIATIVES STUDY / 12430 / SEPTEMBER 2012 PAGE 147Table 49-3QUESTION 40:If there was a network in your community for business leaders to learn about issues related to worksite wellness initiatives and to share information, how likely is it thatsomeone from your organization would join this network?BANNER 3 ------------------- AMONG THOSE WITH WELLNESS INITIATIVE --------------------- HAVE WELLNESS % OF YEARS FINANCIAL EMPLOYEE ACCESS INITATIVE OPERATING BUDGET IN OPERATION INCENTIVE ROI TO INITIATIVE =========== ================= ================= =========== =========== ================== 6% OR 1-2 3-4 5+ TOTAL YES NO 0-1% 2-5% MORE YRS YRS YRS YES NO YES NO 0-74% 75-84% 85%+ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ -----BASE=TOTAL ASKED 393 215 178 78 61 23 70 41 87 109 104 88 119 18 13 170 100% 55% 45% 36% 28% 11% 33% 19% 40% 51% 48% 41% 55% 8% 6% 79%**D/S (LIKELY - UNLIKELY) 189 135 54 52 35 17 50 27 49 67 66 44 85 8 3 118 48% 63% 30% 67% 57% 74% 71% 66% 56% 61% 63% 50% 71% 44% 23% 69%TOTAL LIKELY 291 175 116 65 48 20 60 34 68 88 85 66 102 13 8 144------------ 74% 81% 65% 83% 79% 87% 86% 83% 78% 81% 82% 75% 86% 72% 62% 85%TOTAL UNLIKELY 102 40 62 13 13 3 10 7 19 21 19 22 17 5 5 26-------------- 26% 19% 35% 17% 21% 13% 14% 17% 22% 19% 18% 25% 14% 28% 38% 15% VERY LIKELY 114 78 36 27 22 8 29 15 30 47 31 36 39 2 3 70 29% 36% 20% 35% 36% 35% 41% 37% 34% 43% 30% 41% 33% 11% 23% 41% SOMEWHAT LIKELY 177 97 80 38 26 12 31 19 38 41 54 30 63 11 5 74 45% 45% 45% 49% 43% 52% 44% 46% 44% 38% 52% 34% 53% 61% 38% 44% SOMEWHAT UNLIKELY 76 29 47 11 9 2 6 5 16 12 17 14 14 4 4 19 19% 13% 26% 14% 15% 9% 9% 12% 18% 11% 16% 16% 12% 22% 31% 11% VERY UNLIKELY 26 11 15 2 4 1 4 2 3 9 2 8 3 1 1 7 7% 5% 8% 3% 7% 4% 6% 5% 3% 8% 2% 9% 3% 6% 8% 4% P U B L I C O P I N I O N S T R A T E G I E S
    • WORKPLACE WELLNESS INITIATIVES STUDY / 12430 / SEPTEMBER 2012 PAGE 148Table 50-1QUESTION 41:In your professional opinion, which one of the following best describes how your organization views the state and local governments involvement in worksite wellnessinitiatives for companies like yours?The state and local government should be MORE ACTIVE in helping create and expand worksite wellness initiatives.The state and local government should be LESS ACTIVE in helping create and expand worksite wellness initiatives.The state and local government should NOT REALLY CHANGE their level of involvement in helping create and expand worksite wellness initiatives.BANNER 1 ORG HEALTH ORGANIZATION SIZE PROFIT STATUS REGION EMPLOYEES W/ CARE YEARS IN OPERATION GRADE ================= ================= ======================= ================== ======================= =========== NON- 100- PRIV- PUB- PROF/ NORTH MID- 0-10 11-20 21-50 51+ TOTAL 1-99 499 500+ ATE LIC GOVT -EAST SOUTH WEST WEST 0-74% 75-84% 85%+ YRS YRS YRS YRS A/B C/D/F ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----BASE=TOTAL ASKED 392 111 117 164 204 75 113 60 122 138 72 107 78 167 44 61 140 133 227 163 100% 28% 30% 42% 52% 19% 29% 15% 31% 35% 18% 27% 20% 43% 11% 16% 36% 34% 58% 42%**D/S (MORE ACTIVE - LESS 124 33 46 45 62 17 45 20 40 41 23 30 17 68 11 24 40 46 58 65 ACTIVE) 32% 30% 39% 27% 30% 23% 40% 33% 33% 30% 32% 28% 22% 41% 25% 39% 29% 35% 26% 40%MORE ACTIVE 184 50 62 72 94 29 61 31 58 61 34 48 30 91 16 32 64 67 95 88 47% 45% 53% 44% 46% 39% 54% 52% 48% 44% 47% 45% 38% 54% 36% 52% 46% 50% 42% 54%LESS ACTIVE 60 17 16 27 32 12 16 11 18 20 11 18 13 23 5 8 24 21 37 23 15% 15% 14% 16% 16% 16% 14% 18% 15% 14% 15% 17% 17% 14% 11% 13% 17% 16% 16% 14%NOT REALLY CHANGE 148 44 39 65 78 34 36 18 46 57 27 41 35 53 23 21 52 45 95 52 38% 40% 33% 40% 38% 45% 32% 30% 38% 41% 38% 38% 45% 32% 52% 34% 37% 34% 42% 32% P U B L I C O P I N I O N S T R A T E G I E S
    • WORKPLACE WELLNESS INITIATIVES STUDY / 12430 / SEPTEMBER 2012 PAGE 149Table 50-2QUESTION 41:In your professional opinion, which one of the following best describes how your organization views the state and local governments involvement in worksite wellnessinitiatives for companies like yours?The state and local government should be MORE ACTIVE in helping create and expand worksite wellness initiatives.The state and local government should be LESS ACTIVE in helping create and expand worksite wellness initiatives.The state and local government should NOT REALLY CHANGE their level of involvement in helping create and expand worksite wellness initiatives.BANNER 2 WELLNESS ROLE OF IMPORTANT ISSUES (%10) HEALTH CONCERNS (COMBINED) - BENEFICIAL STATE/LOCAL GOVT ROLE OF FED GOVT ======================== =============================== ================= ================= ================= DECR LACK HIGH NOT INSU- PROD- WORK- OBES- STRESS OF CHRON BLOOD VERY/ MORE LESS NO MORE LESS NO RANCE UCTI- ABSEN- ERS ITY/ /MEN- FIT- DIS- PRE- AT ACT- ACT- CHAN- ACT- ACT- CHAN- TOTAL COSTS VITY TEEISM COMP WEIGHT TAL NESS EASE SSURE VERY SMWT ALL IVE IVE GE IVE IVE GE ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ------ ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----BASE=TOTAL ASKED 392 187 133 113 105 206 202 200 125 131 145 197 48 184 60 148 151 78 156 100% 48% 34% 29% 27% 53% 52% 51% 32% 33% 37% 50% 12% 47% 15% 38% 39% 20% 40%**D/S (MORE ACTIVE - LESS 124 65 54 52 45 72 63 83 28 38 60 63 1 184 -60 - 127 -41 33 ACTIVE) 32% 35% 41% 46% 43% 35% 31% 42% 22% 29% 41% 32% 2% 100% -100% - 84% -53% 21%MORE ACTIVE 184 92 70 64 58 103 92 107 48 59 76 95 13 184 - - 133 13 33 47% 49% 53% 57% 55% 50% 46% 54% 38% 45% 52% 48% 27% 100% - - 88% 17% 21%LESS ACTIVE 60 27 16 12 13 31 29 24 20 21 16 32 12 - 60 - 6 54 - 15% 14% 12% 11% 12% 15% 14% 12% 16% 16% 11% 16% 25% - 100% - 4% 69% -NOT REALLY CHANGE 148 68 47 37 34 72 81 69 57 51 53 70 23 - - 148 12 11 123 38% 36% 35% 33% 32% 35% 40% 35% 46% 39% 37% 36% 48% - - 100% 8% 14% 79% P U B L I C O P I N I O N S T R A T E G I E S
    • WORKPLACE WELLNESS INITIATIVES STUDY / 12430 / SEPTEMBER 2012 PAGE 150Table 50-3QUESTION 41:In your professional opinion, which one of the following best describes how your organization views the state and local governments involvement in worksite wellnessinitiatives for companies like yours?The state and local government should be MORE ACTIVE in helping create and expand worksite wellness initiatives.The state and local government should be LESS ACTIVE in helping create and expand worksite wellness initiatives.The state and local government should NOT REALLY CHANGE their level of involvement in helping create and expand worksite wellness initiatives.BANNER 3 ------------------- AMONG THOSE WITH WELLNESS INITIATIVE --------------------- HAVE WELLNESS % OF YEARS FINANCIAL EMPLOYEE ACCESS INITATIVE OPERATING BUDGET IN OPERATION INCENTIVE ROI TO INITIATIVE =========== ================= ================= =========== =========== ================== 6% OR 1-2 3-4 5+ TOTAL YES NO 0-1% 2-5% MORE YRS YRS YRS YES NO YES NO 0-74% 75-84% 85%+ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ -----BASE=TOTAL ASKED 392 213 179 78 62 23 71 42 86 109 104 88 119 19 13 169 100% 54% 46% 37% 29% 11% 33% 20% 40% 51% 49% 41% 56% 9% 6% 79%**D/S (MORE ACTIVE - LESS 124 81 43 39 16 14 31 16 30 42 39 29 48 -1 2 75 ACTIVE) 32% 38% 24% 50% 26% 61% 44% 38% 35% 39% 38% 33% 40% -5% 15% 44%MORE ACTIVE 184 109 75 43 29 16 38 24 42 59 50 44 61 3 5 94 47% 51% 42% 55% 47% 70% 54% 57% 49% 54% 48% 50% 51% 16% 38% 56%LESS ACTIVE 60 28 32 4 13 2 7 8 12 17 11 15 13 4 3 19 15% 13% 18% 5% 21% 9% 10% 19% 14% 16% 11% 17% 11% 21% 23% 11%NOT REALLY CHANGE 148 76 72 31 20 5 26 10 32 33 43 29 45 12 5 56 38% 36% 40% 40% 32% 22% 37% 24% 37% 30% 41% 33% 38% 63% 38% 33% P U B L I C O P I N I O N S T R A T E G I E S
    • WORKPLACE WELLNESS INITIATIVES STUDY / 12430 / SEPTEMBER 2012 PAGE 151Table 51-1QUESTION 42:In your professional opinion, which one of the following best describes how your organization views the federal governments involvement in worksite wellness initiatives forcompanies like yours?The federal government should be MORE ACTIVE in helping create and expand worksite wellness initiatives.The federal government should be LESS ACTIVE in helping create and expand worksite wellness initiatives.The federal government should NOT REALLY CHANGE their level of involvement in helping create and expand worksite wellness initiatives.BANNER 1 ORG HEALTH ORGANIZATION SIZE PROFIT STATUS REGION EMPLOYEES W/ CARE YEARS IN OPERATION GRADE ================= ================= ======================= ================== ======================= =========== NON- 100- PRIV- PUB- PROF/ NORTH MID- 0-10 11-20 21-50 51+ TOTAL 1-99 499 500+ ATE LIC GOVT -EAST SOUTH WEST WEST 0-74% 75-84% 85%+ YRS YRS YRS YRS A/B C/D/F ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----BASE=TOTAL ASKED 388 110 118 160 204 71 113 60 121 137 70 107 76 166 44 59 142 130 224 161 100% 28% 30% 41% 53% 18% 29% 15% 31% 35% 18% 28% 20% 43% 11% 15% 37% 34% 58% 41%**D/S (MORE ACTIVE - LESS 73 14 28 31 37 6 30 12 27 19 15 26 3 38 2 11 36 21 31 41 ACTIVE) 19% 13% 24% 19% 18% 8% 27% 20% 22% 14% 21% 24% 4% 23% 5% 19% 25% 16% 14% 25%MORE ACTIVE 152 40 50 62 78 21 53 25 47 48 32 45 23 71 11 22 62 51 80 71 39% 36% 42% 39% 38% 30% 47% 42% 39% 35% 46% 42% 30% 43% 25% 37% 44% 39% 36% 44%LESS ACTIVE 79 26 22 31 41 15 23 13 20 29 17 19 20 33 9 11 26 30 49 30 20% 24% 19% 19% 20% 21% 20% 22% 17% 21% 24% 18% 26% 20% 20% 19% 18% 23% 22% 19%NOT REALLY CHANGE 157 44 46 67 85 35 37 22 54 60 21 43 33 62 24 26 54 49 95 60 40% 40% 39% 42% 42% 49% 33% 37% 45% 44% 30% 40% 43% 37% 55% 44% 38% 38% 42% 37% P U B L I C O P I N I O N S T R A T E G I E S
    • WORKPLACE WELLNESS INITIATIVES STUDY / 12430 / SEPTEMBER 2012 PAGE 152Table 51-2QUESTION 42:In your professional opinion, which one of the following best describes how your organization views the federal governments involvement in worksite wellness initiatives forcompanies like yours?The federal government should be MORE ACTIVE in helping create and expand worksite wellness initiatives.The federal government should be LESS ACTIVE in helping create and expand worksite wellness initiatives.The federal government should NOT REALLY CHANGE their level of involvement in helping create and expand worksite wellness initiatives.BANNER 2 WELLNESS ROLE OF IMPORTANT ISSUES (%10) HEALTH CONCERNS (COMBINED) - BENEFICIAL STATE/LOCAL GOVT ROLE OF FED GOVT ======================== =============================== ================= ================= ================= DECR LACK HIGH NOT INSU- PROD- WORK- OBES- STRESS OF CHRON BLOOD VERY/ MORE LESS NO MORE LESS NO RANCE UCTI- ABSEN- ERS ITY/ /MEN- FIT- DIS- PRE- AT ACT- ACT- CHAN- ACT- ACT- CHAN- TOTAL COSTS VITY TEEISM COMP WEIGHT TAL NESS EASE SSURE VERY SMWT ALL IVE IVE GE IVE IVE GE ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ------ ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----BASE=TOTAL ASKED 388 185 129 111 103 204 199 197 125 130 146 192 48 179 60 146 152 79 157 100% 48% 33% 29% 27% 53% 51% 51% 32% 34% 38% 49% 12% 46% 15% 38% 39% 20% 40%**D/S (MORE ACTIVE - LESS 73 37 36 32 34 35 45 54 7 23 54 21 -2 120 -48 1 152 -79 - ACTIVE) 19% 20% 28% 29% 33% 17% 23% 27% 6% 18% 37% 11% -4% 67% -80% 1% 100% -100% -MORE ACTIVE 152 75 56 51 49 78 83 87 36 49 72 68 11 133 6 12 152 - - 39% 41% 43% 46% 48% 38% 42% 44% 29% 38% 49% 35% 23% 74% 10% 8% 100% - -LESS ACTIVE 79 38 20 19 15 43 38 33 29 26 18 47 13 13 54 11 - 79 - 20% 21% 16% 17% 15% 21% 19% 17% 23% 20% 12% 24% 27% 7% 90% 8% - 100% -NOT REALLY CHANGE 157 72 53 41 39 83 78 77 60 55 56 77 24 33 - 123 - - 157 40% 39% 41% 37% 38% 41% 39% 39% 48% 42% 38% 40% 50% 18% - 84% - - 100% P U B L I C O P I N I O N S T R A T E G I E S
    • WORKPLACE WELLNESS INITIATIVES STUDY / 12430 / SEPTEMBER 2012 PAGE 153Table 51-3QUESTION 42:In your professional opinion, which one of the following best describes how your organization views the federal governments involvement in worksite wellness initiatives forcompanies like yours?The federal government should be MORE ACTIVE in helping create and expand worksite wellness initiatives.The federal government should be LESS ACTIVE in helping create and expand worksite wellness initiatives.The federal government should NOT REALLY CHANGE their level of involvement in helping create and expand worksite wellness initiatives.BANNER 3 ------------------- AMONG THOSE WITH WELLNESS INITIATIVE --------------------- HAVE WELLNESS % OF YEARS FINANCIAL EMPLOYEE ACCESS INITATIVE OPERATING BUDGET IN OPERATION INCENTIVE ROI TO INITIATIVE =========== ================= ================= =========== =========== ================== 6% OR 1-2 3-4 5+ TOTAL YES NO 0-1% 2-5% MORE YRS YRS YRS YES NO YES NO 0-74% 75-84% 85%+ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ -----BASE=TOTAL ASKED 388 211 177 78 62 23 71 40 87 107 103 86 118 19 13 168 100% 54% 46% 37% 29% 11% 34% 19% 41% 51% 49% 41% 56% 9% 6% 80%**D/S (MORE ACTIVE - LESS 73 54 19 19 15 12 23 9 14 27 27 24 27 1 4 48 ACTIVE) 19% 26% 11% 24% 24% 52% 32% 23% 16% 25% 26% 28% 23% 5% 31% 29%MORE ACTIVE 152 91 61 30 28 14 32 20 31 49 42 42 46 5 7 74 39% 43% 34% 38% 45% 61% 45% 50% 36% 46% 41% 49% 39% 26% 54% 44%LESS ACTIVE 79 37 42 11 13 2 9 11 17 22 15 18 19 4 3 26 20% 18% 24% 14% 21% 9% 13% 28% 20% 21% 15% 21% 16% 21% 23% 15%NOT REALLY CHANGE 157 83 74 37 21 7 30 9 39 36 46 26 53 10 3 68 40% 39% 42% 47% 34% 30% 42% 23% 45% 34% 45% 30% 45% 53% 23% 40% P U B L I C O P I N I O N S T R A T E G I E S
    • WORKPLACE WELLNESS INITIATIVES STUDY / 12430 / SEPTEMBER 2012 PAGE 154Table 52-1QUESTION D1:Approximately, what percentage of your regular full and part-time employees are covered under some type of health care plan offered by your organization?BANNER 1 ORG HEALTH ORGANIZATION SIZE PROFIT STATUS REGION EMPLOYEES W/ CARE YEARS IN OPERATION GRADE ================= ================= ======================= ================== ======================= =========== NON- 100- PRIV- PUB- PROF/ NORTH MID- 0-10 11-20 21-50 51+ TOTAL 1-99 499 500+ ATE LIC GOVT -EAST SOUTH WEST WEST 0-74% 75-84% 85%+ YRS YRS YRS YRS A/B C/D/F ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----BASE=TOTAL ASKED 356 99 113 144 184 67 105 57 113 121 65 108 79 169 35 55 136 123 204 150 100% 28% 32% 40% 52% 19% 29% 16% 32% 34% 18% 30% 22% 47% 10% 15% 38% 35% 57% 42%0-74% 108 26 39 43 60 15 33 21 34 37 16 108 - - 9 16 50 32 59 49 30% 26% 35% 30% 33% 22% 31% 37% 30% 31% 25% 100% - - 26% 29% 37% 26% 29% 33%75-84% 79 17 29 33 43 12 24 14 25 23 17 - 79 - 6 18 21 31 43 35 22% 17% 26% 23% 23% 18% 23% 25% 22% 19% 26% - 100% - 17% 33% 15% 25% 21% 23%85%+ 169 56 45 68 81 40 48 22 54 61 32 - - 169 20 21 65 60 102 66 47% 57% 40% 47% 44% 60% 46% 39% 48% 50% 49% - - 100% 57% 38% 48% 49% 50% 44%MEAN 77.5 79.7 74.4 78.5 76.3 82.7 76.3 72.2 78.8 77.7 79.6 51.5 78.8 93.5 80.7 76.5 74.9 79.9 78.7 75.9 P U B L I C O P I N I O N S T R A T E G I E S
    • WORKPLACE WELLNESS INITIATIVES STUDY / 12430 / SEPTEMBER 2012 PAGE 155Table 52-2QUESTION D1:Approximately, what percentage of your regular full and part-time employees are covered under some type of health care plan offered by your organization?BANNER 2 WELLNESS ROLE OF IMPORTANT ISSUES (%10) HEALTH CONCERNS (COMBINED) - BENEFICIAL STATE/LOCAL GOVT ROLE OF FED GOVT ======================== =============================== ================= ================= ================= DECR LACK HIGH NOT INSU- PROD- WORK- OBES- STRESS OF CHRON BLOOD VERY/ MORE LESS NO MORE LESS NO RANCE UCTI- ABSEN- ERS ITY/ /MEN- FIT- DIS- PRE- AT ACT- ACT- CHAN- ACT- ACT- CHAN- TOTAL COSTS VITY TEEISM COMP WEIGHT TAL NESS EASE SSURE VERY SMWT ALL IVE IVE GE IVE IVE GE ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ------ ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----BASE=TOTAL ASKED 356 174 122 105 96 191 179 186 114 121 133 179 42 169 54 129 139 72 138 100% 49% 34% 29% 27% 54% 50% 52% 32% 34% 37% 50% 12% 47% 15% 36% 39% 20% 39%0-74% 108 60 33 30 31 61 52 54 36 34 40 58 10 48 18 41 45 19 43 30% 34% 27% 29% 32% 32% 29% 29% 32% 28% 30% 32% 24% 28% 33% 32% 32% 26% 31%75-84% 79 34 24 22 22 41 35 43 32 24 25 42 11 30 13 35 23 20 33 22% 20% 20% 21% 23% 21% 20% 23% 28% 20% 19% 23% 26% 18% 24% 27% 17% 28% 24%85%+ 169 80 65 53 43 89 92 89 46 63 68 79 21 91 23 53 71 33 62 47% 46% 53% 50% 45% 47% 51% 48% 40% 52% 51% 44% 50% 54% 43% 41% 51% 46% 45%MEAN 77.5 76.4 79.7 77.6 76.0 78.0 78.7 77.3 76.4 79.5 78.9 76.2 78.3 78.7 74.7 77.0 77.4 77.7 77.2 P U B L I C O P I N I O N S T R A T E G I E S
    • WORKPLACE WELLNESS INITIATIVES STUDY / 12430 / SEPTEMBER 2012 PAGE 156Table 52-3QUESTION D1:Approximately, what percentage of your regular full and part-time employees are covered under some type of health care plan offered by your organization?BANNER 3 ------------------- AMONG THOSE WITH WELLNESS INITIATIVE --------------------- HAVE WELLNESS % OF YEARS FINANCIAL EMPLOYEE ACCESS INITATIVE OPERATING BUDGET IN OPERATION INCENTIVE ROI TO INITIATIVE =========== ================= ================= =========== =========== ================== 6% OR 1-2 3-4 5+ TOTAL YES NO 0-1% 2-5% MORE YRS YRS YRS YES NO YES NO 0-74% 75-84% 85%+ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ -----BASE=TOTAL ASKED 356 190 166 77 59 23 63 38 84 102 87 81 103 17 11 161 100% 53% 47% 41% 31% 12% 33% 20% 44% 54% 46% 43% 54% 9% 6% 85%0-74% 108 49 59 24 16 3 20 3 24 33 16 20 28 10 4 35 30% 26% 36% 31% 27% 13% 32% 8% 29% 32% 18% 25% 27% 59% 36% 22%75-84% 79 42 37 13 13 7 14 16 12 20 22 20 21 1 7 34 22% 22% 22% 17% 22% 30% 22% 42% 14% 20% 25% 25% 20% 6% 64% 21%85%+ 169 99 70 40 30 13 29 19 48 49 49 41 54 6 - 92 47% 52% 42% 52% 51% 57% 46% 50% 57% 48% 56% 51% 52% 35% - 57%MEAN 77.5 79.9 74.8 79.0 78.5 83.5 76.6 83.1 81.0 77.4 82.8 80.3 79.1 70.5 70.5 81.5 P U B L I C O P I N I O N S T R A T E G I E S
    • WORKPLACE WELLNESS INITIATIVES STUDY / 12430 / SEPTEMBER 2012 PAGE 157Table 53-1QUESTION D2:Approximately, what percentage of your regular full and part-time employees have access to your worksite wellness initiatives?BANNER 1 ORG HEALTH ORGANIZATION SIZE PROFIT STATUS REGION EMPLOYEES W/ CARE YEARS IN OPERATION GRADE ================= ================= ======================= ================== ======================= =========== NON- 100- PRIV- PUB- PROF/ NORTH MID- 0-10 11-20 21-50 51+ TOTAL 1-99 499 500+ ATE LIC GOVT -EAST SOUTH WEST WEST 0-74% 75-84% 85%+ YRS YRS YRS YRS A/B C/D/F ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----BASE=TOTAL ASKED 204 29 60 115 88 51 65 28 64 75 37 49 42 98 11 22 75 91 113 89 100% 14% 29% 56% 43% 25% 32% 14% 31% 37% 18% 24% 21% 48% 5% 11% 37% 45% 55% 44%0-24% 6 - 2 4 3 2 1 1 2 3 - 3 - 2 1 1 3 1 2 4 3% - 3% 3% 3% 4% 2% 4% 3% 4% - 6% - 2% 9% 5% 4% 1% 2% 4%25-49% 4 1 - 3 3 1 - 1 2 1 - 3 - 1 - 1 3 - 1 3 2% 3% - 3% 3% 2% - 4% 3% 1% - 6% - 1% - 5% 4% - 1% 3%50-74% 9 1 - 8 2 4 3 4 - 2 3 4 1 3 1 - - 8 6 3 4% 3% - 7% 2% 8% 5% 14% - 3% 8% 8% 2% 3% 9% - - 9% 5% 3%75%+ 185 27 58 100 80 44 61 22 60 69 34 39 41 92 9 20 69 82 104 79 91% 93% 97% 87% 91% 86% 94% 79% 94% 92% 92% 80% 98% 94% 82% 91% 92% 90% 92% 89%MEAN 92.5 96.5 94.5 90.4 92.3 90.9 93.9 86.8 92.1 93.9 94.6 85.9 94.4 95.6 87.3 90.2 92.0 93.6 94.7 89.5LESS THAN 100% 52 5 15 32 22 12 18 10 19 14 9 17 12 19 3 8 20 21 21 31 25% 17% 25% 28% 25% 24% 28% 36% 30% 19% 24% 35% 29% 19% 27% 36% 27% 23% 19% 35%100% 152 24 45 83 66 39 47 18 45 61 28 32 30 79 8 14 55 70 92 58 75% 83% 75% 72% 75% 76% 72% 64% 70% 81% 76% 65% 71% 81% 73% 64% 73% 77% 81% 65% P U B L I C O P I N I O N S T R A T E G I E S
    • WORKPLACE WELLNESS INITIATIVES STUDY / 12430 / SEPTEMBER 2012 PAGE 158Table 53-2QUESTION D2:Approximately, what percentage of your regular full and part-time employees have access to your worksite wellness initiatives?BANNER 2 WELLNESS ROLE OF IMPORTANT ISSUES (%10) HEALTH CONCERNS (COMBINED) - BENEFICIAL STATE/LOCAL GOVT ROLE OF FED GOVT ======================== =============================== ================= ================= ================= DECR LACK HIGH NOT INSU- PROD- WORK- OBES- STRESS OF CHRON BLOOD VERY/ MORE LESS NO MORE LESS NO RANCE UCTI- ABSEN- ERS ITY/ /MEN- FIT- DIS- PRE- AT ACT- ACT- CHAN- ACT- ACT- CHAN- TOTAL COSTS VITY TEEISM COMP WEIGHT TAL NESS EASE SSURE VERY SMWT ALL IVE IVE GE IVE IVE GE ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ------ ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----BASE=TOTAL ASKED 204 100 74 64 59 122 104 106 61 74 100 88 15 102 26 73 86 33 81 100% 49% 36% 31% 29% 60% 51% 52% 30% 36% 49% 43% 7% 50% 13% 36% 42% 16% 40%0-24% 6 6 3 2 2 2 4 4 - 1 3 2 1 1 1 4 1 1 4 3% 6% 4% 3% 3% 2% 4% 4% - 1% 3% 2% 7% 1% 4% 5% 1% 3% 5%25-49% 4 3 2 2 1 2 2 2 3 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 2% 3% 3% 3% 2% 2% 2% 2% 5% 3% 1% 1% 13% 1% 4% 3% 1% 3% 2%50-74% 9 6 3 3 1 5 5 4 5 3 4 4 1 1 2 6 3 2 4 4% 6% 4% 5% 2% 4% 5% 4% 8% 4% 4% 5% 7% 1% 8% 8% 3% 6% 5%75%+ 185 85 66 57 55 113 93 96 53 68 92 81 11 99 22 61 81 29 71 91% 85% 89% 89% 93% 93% 89% 91% 87% 92% 92% 92% 73% 97% 85% 84% 94% 88% 88%MEAN 92.5 89.0 92.6 92.7 94.2 93.6 92.3 92.2 91.3 93.2 93.5 93.6 80.0 96.2 87.9 88.6 94.4 90.6 90.8LESS THAN 100% 52 28 15 14 10 33 23 26 17 20 24 19 8 20 8 24 21 8 23 25% 28% 20% 22% 17% 27% 22% 25% 28% 27% 24% 22% 53% 20% 31% 33% 24% 24% 28%100% 152 72 59 50 49 89 81 80 44 54 76 69 7 82 18 49 65 25 58 75% 72% 80% 78% 83% 73% 78% 75% 72% 73% 76% 78% 47% 80% 69% 67% 76% 76% 72% P U B L I C O P I N I O N S T R A T E G I E S
    • WORKPLACE WELLNESS INITIATIVES STUDY / 12430 / SEPTEMBER 2012 PAGE 159Table 53-3QUESTION D2:Approximately, what percentage of your regular full and part-time employees have access to your worksite wellness initiatives?BANNER 3 ------------------- AMONG THOSE WITH WELLNESS INITIATIVE --------------------- HAVE WELLNESS % OF YEARS FINANCIAL EMPLOYEE ACCESS INITATIVE OPERATING BUDGET IN OPERATION INCENTIVE ROI TO INITIATIVE =========== ================= ================= =========== =========== ================== 6% OR 1-2 3-4 5+ TOTAL YES NO 0-1% 2-5% MORE YRS YRS YRS YES NO YES NO 0-74% 75-84% 85%+ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ -----BASE=TOTAL ASKED 204 204 - 78 63 24 68 41 86 105 98 84 114 19 13 172 100% 100% - 38% 31% 12% 33% 20% 42% 51% 48% 41% 56% 9% 6% 84%0-24% 6 6 - 1 4 1 5 - 1 - 6 1 5 6 - - 3% 3% - 1% 6% 4% 7% - 1% - 6% 1% 4% 32% - -25-49% 4 4 - 1 3 - 3 1 - 2 2 3 1 4 - - 2% 2% - 1% 5% - 4% 2% - 2% 2% 4% 1% 21% - -50-74% 9 9 - 2 3 2 4 1 4 4 5 6 3 9 - - 4% 4% - 3% 5% 8% 6% 2% 5% 4% 5% 7% 3% 47% - -75%+ 185 185 - 74 53 21 56 39 81 99 85 74 105 - 13 172 91% 91% - 95% 84% 88% 82% 95% 94% 94% 87% 88% 92% - 100% 100%MEAN 92.5 92.5 - 96.0 86.3 92.5 86.9 94.9 95.5 95.5 89.2 92.1 92.3 41.6 78.1 99.2LESS THAN 100% 52 52 - 13 25 5 22 10 18 22 30 19 33 19 13 20 25% 25% - 17% 40% 21% 32% 24% 21% 21% 31% 23% 29% 100% 100% 12%100% 152 152 - 65 38 19 46 31 68 83 68 65 81 - - 152 75% 75% - 83% 60% 79% 68% 76% 79% 79% 69% 77% 71% - - 88% P U B L I C O P I N I O N S T R A T E G I E S
    • WORKPLACE WELLNESS INITIATIVES STUDY / 12430 / SEPTEMBER 2012 PAGE 160Table 54-1QUESTION D3:How many years has your organization been in operation?BANNER 1 ORG HEALTH ORGANIZATION SIZE PROFIT STATUS REGION EMPLOYEES W/ CARE YEARS IN OPERATION GRADE ================= ================= ======================= ================== ======================= =========== NON- 100- PRIV- PUB- PROF/ NORTH MID- 0-10 11-20 21-50 51+ TOTAL 1-99 499 500+ ATE LIC GOVT -EAST SOUTH WEST WEST 0-74% 75-84% 85%+ YRS YRS YRS YRS A/B C/D/F ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----BASE=TOTAL ASKED 386 111 120 155 203 73 110 59 123 133 71 107 76 166 46 61 144 135 221 162 100% 29% 31% 40% 53% 19% 28% 15% 32% 34% 18% 28% 20% 43% 12% 16% 37% 35% 57% 42%0-10 46 20 13 13 39 7 - 6 12 16 12 9 6 20 46 - - - 31 15 12% 18% 11% 8% 19% 10% - 10% 10% 12% 17% 8% 8% 12% 100% - - - 14% 9%11-20 61 27 20 14 48 6 7 10 24 15 12 16 18 21 - 61 - - 36 25 16% 24% 17% 9% 24% 8% 6% 17% 20% 11% 17% 15% 24% 13% - 100% - - 16% 15%21-30 65 22 22 21 41 15 9 10 26 15 14 23 8 29 - - 65 - 39 25 17% 20% 18% 14% 20% 21% 8% 17% 21% 11% 20% 21% 11% 17% - - 45% - 18% 15%31-50 79 13 33 33 35 16 28 14 26 31 8 27 13 36 - - 79 - 43 35 20% 12% 28% 21% 17% 22% 25% 24% 21% 23% 11% 25% 17% 22% - - 55% - 19% 22%51-60 26 8 9 9 9 4 13 2 8 11 5 10 5 9 - - - 26 13 13 7% 7% 8% 6% 4% 5% 12% 3% 7% 8% 7% 9% 7% 5% - - - 19% 6% 8%61-70 12 1 5 6 7 1 4 2 2 5 3 2 3 5 - - - 12 5 6 3% 1% 4% 4% 3% 1% 4% 3% 2% 4% 4% 2% 4% 3% - - - 9% 2% 4%71+ 97 20 18 59 24 24 49 15 25 40 17 20 23 46 - - - 97 54 43 25% 18% 15% 38% 12% 33% 45% 25% 20% 30% 24% 19% 30% 28% - - - 72% 24% 27%MEAN 39.0 30.7 37.0 47.5 28.9 45.9 55.8 35.9 35.3 44.6 37.5 38.3 41.0 41.0 7.1 15.7 34.8 77.0 36.8 42.0 P U B L I C O P I N I O N S T R A T E G I E S
    • WORKPLACE WELLNESS INITIATIVES STUDY / 12430 / SEPTEMBER 2012 PAGE 161Table 54-2QUESTION D3:How many years has your organization been in operation?BANNER 2 WELLNESS ROLE OF IMPORTANT ISSUES (%10) HEALTH CONCERNS (COMBINED) - BENEFICIAL STATE/LOCAL GOVT ROLE OF FED GOVT ======================== =============================== ================= ================= ================= DECR LACK HIGH NOT INSU- PROD- WORK- OBES- STRESS OF CHRON BLOOD VERY/ MORE LESS NO MORE LESS NO RANCE UCTI- ABSEN- ERS ITY/ /MEN- FIT- DIS- PRE- AT ACT- ACT- CHAN- ACT- ACT- CHAN- TOTAL COSTS VITY TEEISM COMP WEIGHT TAL NESS EASE SSURE VERY SMWT ALL IVE IVE GE IVE IVE GE ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ------ ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----BASE=TOTAL ASKED 386 186 133 113 103 201 196 197 125 127 145 191 48 179 58 141 146 76 153 100% 48% 34% 29% 27% 52% 51% 51% 32% 33% 38% 49% 12% 46% 15% 37% 38% 20% 40%0-10 46 19 14 13 10 17 25 21 13 13 16 21 7 16 5 23 11 9 24 12% 10% 11% 12% 10% 8% 13% 11% 10% 10% 11% 11% 15% 9% 9% 16% 8% 12% 16%11-20 61 22 18 13 15 29 26 38 20 22 19 28 14 32 8 21 22 11 26 16% 12% 14% 12% 15% 14% 13% 19% 16% 17% 13% 15% 29% 18% 14% 15% 15% 14% 17%21-30 65 36 20 13 12 36 39 32 19 19 22 34 9 28 6 29 24 8 32 17% 19% 15% 12% 12% 18% 20% 16% 15% 15% 15% 18% 19% 16% 10% 21% 16% 11% 21%31-50 79 37 35 26 25 39 40 40 27 25 32 38 9 36 18 23 38 18 22 20% 20% 26% 23% 24% 19% 20% 20% 22% 20% 22% 20% 19% 20% 31% 16% 26% 24% 14%51-60 26 12 3 4 5 17 13 9 7 10 8 14 4 12 3 11 9 4 12 7% 6% 2% 4% 5% 8% 7% 5% 6% 8% 6% 7% 8% 7% 5% 8% 6% 5% 8%61-70 12 9 6 6 6 6 6 8 4 7 6 6 - 6 2 4 4 3 5 3% 5% 5% 5% 6% 3% 3% 4% 3% 6% 4% 3% - 3% 3% 3% 3% 4% 3%71+ 97 51 37 38 30 57 47 49 35 31 42 50 5 49 16 30 38 23 32 25% 27% 28% 34% 29% 28% 24% 25% 28% 24% 29% 26% 10% 27% 28% 21% 26% 30% 21%MEAN 39.0 42.0 39.9 43.4 43.0 42.3 37.7 38.3 39.9 40.3 39.5 41.5 29.7 39.9 44.8 35.7 40.0 45.1 34.3 P U B L I C O P I N I O N S T R A T E G I E S
    • WORKPLACE WELLNESS INITIATIVES STUDY / 12430 / SEPTEMBER 2012 PAGE 162Table 54-3QUESTION D3:How many years has your organization been in operation?BANNER 3 ------------------- AMONG THOSE WITH WELLNESS INITIATIVE --------------------- HAVE WELLNESS % OF YEARS FINANCIAL EMPLOYEE ACCESS INITATIVE OPERATING BUDGET IN OPERATION INCENTIVE ROI TO INITIATIVE =========== ================= ================= =========== =========== ================== 6% OR 1-2 3-4 5+ TOTAL YES NO 0-1% 2-5% MORE YRS YRS YRS YES NO YES NO 0-74% 75-84% 85%+ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ -----BASE=TOTAL ASKED 386 208 178 78 62 24 69 41 87 105 102 87 116 19 13 167 100% 54% 46% 38% 30% 12% 33% 20% 42% 50% 49% 42% 56% 9% 6% 80%0-10 46 13 33 5 1 4 9 1 2 3 10 3 10 2 1 8 12% 6% 19% 6% 2% 17% 13% 2% 2% 3% 10% 3% 9% 11% 8% 5%11-20 61 22 39 10 7 2 10 5 7 9 13 4 17 2 2 18 16% 11% 22% 13% 11% 8% 14% 12% 8% 9% 13% 5% 15% 11% 15% 11%21-30 65 33 32 14 11 1 11 9 12 13 19 9 22 3 2 27 17% 16% 18% 18% 18% 4% 16% 22% 14% 12% 19% 10% 19% 16% 15% 16%31-50 79 44 35 18 16 4 16 7 20 25 19 22 22 3 1 39 20% 21% 20% 23% 26% 17% 23% 17% 23% 24% 19% 25% 19% 16% 8% 23%51-60 26 13 13 7 3 - 3 1 7 7 6 4 8 2 - 10 7% 6% 7% 9% 5% - 4% 2% 8% 7% 6% 5% 7% 11% - 6%61-70 12 8 4 1 3 1 3 2 3 7 1 4 3 - - 7 3% 4% 2% 1% 5% 4% 4% 5% 3% 7% 1% 5% 3% - - 4%71+ 97 75 22 23 21 12 17 16 36 41 34 41 34 7 7 58 25% 36% 12% 29% 34% 50% 25% 39% 41% 39% 33% 47% 29% 37% 54% 35%MEAN 39.0 45.9 32.2 42.6 45.8 54.7 37.5 48.6 51.0 51.5 40.4 54.2 40.7 41.9 47.3 46.0 P U B L I C O P I N I O N S T R A T E G I E S
    • WORKPLACE WELLNESS INITIATIVES STUDY / 12430 / SEPTEMBER 2012 PAGE 163Table 55-1QUESTION D4:Which ONE of the following best describes the primary type of business conducted at the worksite or worksites for which you are responding?BANNER 1 ORG HEALTH ORGANIZATION SIZE PROFIT STATUS REGION EMPLOYEES W/ CARE YEARS IN OPERATION GRADE ================= ================= ======================= ================== ======================= =========== NON- 100- PRIV- PUB- PROF/ NORTH MID- 0-10 11-20 21-50 51+ TOTAL 1-99 499 500+ ATE LIC GOVT -EAST SOUTH WEST WEST 0-74% 75-84% 85%+ YRS YRS YRS YRS A/B C/D/F ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----BASE=TOTAL SAMPLE 406 113 124 169 212 77 117 61 129 140 76 108 79 169 46 61 144 135 234 169 100% 28% 31% 42% 52% 19% 29% 15% 32% 34% 19% 27% 19% 42% 11% 15% 35% 33% 58% 42%PROFESSIONAL, SCIENTIFIC, 68 31 20 17 54 9 5 8 24 20 16 14 12 34 17 16 21 14 46 22AND TECHNICAL SERVICES 17% 27% 16% 10% 25% 12% 4% 13% 19% 14% 21% 13% 15% 20% 37% 26% 15% 10% 20% 13%MANUFACTURING 58 14 18 26 40 17 1 9 18 23 8 11 12 29 8 5 26 17 29 29 14% 12% 15% 15% 19% 22% 1% 15% 14% 16% 11% 10% 15% 17% 17% 8% 18% 13% 12% 17%HEALTH CARE AND SOCIAL 53 13 19 21 17 5 31 13 13 17 10 26 6 15 5 6 20 19 31 22ASSISTANCE 13% 12% 15% 12% 8% 6% 26% 21% 10% 12% 13% 24% 8% 9% 11% 10% 14% 14% 13% 13%FINANCE AND INSURANCE 34 14 8 12 19 5 10 7 6 15 6 7 8 16 4 6 10 14 17 17 8% 12% 6% 7% 9% 6% 9% 11% 5% 11% 8% 6% 10% 9% 9% 10% 7% 10% 7% 10%EDUCATION 26 3 5 18 4 - 22 2 9 8 7 7 4 12 - 1 7 17 13 13 6% 3% 4% 11% 2% - 19% 3% 7% 6% 9% 6% 5% 7% - 2% 5% 13% 6% 8%TRANSPORTATION/ 20 4 5 11 3 6 11 2 4 9 5 1 2 15 - 1 5 12 13 5COMMUNICATION/UTILITIES 5% 4% 4% 7% 1% 8% 9% 3% 3% 6% 7% 1% 3% 9% - 2% 3% 9% 6% 3%RETAIL TRADE 16 2 6 8 9 6 1 4 4 4 4 7 2 5 2 4 6 4 4 12 4% 2% 5% 5% 4% 8% 1% 7% 3% 3% 5% 6% 3% 3% 4% 7% 4% 3% 2% 7%RELIGIOUS, GRANT-MAKING, 16 8 7 1 2 1 13 3 4 9 - 6 6 4 - 1 10 5 11 5CIVIC PROFESSIONAL AND 4% 7% 6% 1% 1% 1% 11% 5% 3% 6% - 6% 8% 2% - 2% 7% 4% 5% 3%SIMILAR ORGANIZATIONSTRANSPORTATION AND 14 2 4 8 9 4 1 2 6 4 2 - 3 8 - 3 4 7 9 4WAREHOUSING 3% 2% 3% 5% 4% 5% 1% 3% 5% 3% 3% - 4% 5% - 5% 3% 5% 4% 2%ACCOMMODATION AND FOOD 14 1 1 12 9 5 - - 6 5 3 5 3 3 - 4 6 2 4 10SERVICES 3% 1% 1% 7% 4% 6% - - 5% 4% 4% 5% 4% 2% - 7% 4% 1% 2% 6%INFORMATION 13 2 8 3 9 3 1 3 6 3 1 4 3 4 1 5 4 2 9 4 3% 2% 6% 2% 4% 4% 1% 5% 5% 2% 1% 4% 4% 2% 2% 8% 3% 1% 4% 2%PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION 13 1 3 9 - 1 12 - 7 5 1 2 5 5 - - 2 9 5 8 3% 1% 2% 5% - 1% 10% - 5% 4% 1% 2% 6% 3% - - 1% 7% 2% 5%ADMINISTRATIVE AND SUPPORT 12 3 6 3 9 3 - 1 5 4 2 6 3 1 3 1 4 2 11 1AND WASTE MANAGEMENT AND 3% 3% 5% 2% 4% 4% - 2% 4% 3% 3% 6% 4% 1% 7% 2% 3% 1% 5% 1%REMEDIATION SERVICESARTS, ENTERTAINMENT AND 9 3 2 4 6 1 2 - 2 2 5 4 - 3 2 1 4 2 9 -RECREATION 2% 3% 2% 2% 3% 1% 2% - 2% 1% 7% 4% - 2% 4% 2% 3% 1% 4% -REAL ESTATE, RENTING, AND 8 2 4 2 6 1 1 3 4 1 - 2 1 5 2 2 3 - 5 3LEASING 2% 2% 3% 1% 3% 1% 1% 5% 3% 1% - 2% 1% 3% 4% 3% 2% - 2% 2%EDUCATIONAL SERVICES 7 2 3 2 2 1 4 - 2 3 2 1 2 1 - 2 2 2 3 4 2% 2% 2% 1% 1% 1% 3% - 2% 2% 3% 1% 3% 1% - 3% 1% 1% 1% 2%CONSTRUCTION 6 5 1 - 5 - 1 - 3 1 2 1 1 2 - 1 3 1 4 2 1% 4% 1% - 2% - 1% - 2% 1% 3% 1% 1% 1% - 2% 2% 1% 2% 1%OTHER 6 1 - 5 2 4 - 3 - 2 1 - 4 1 - 1 2 1 5 1 1% 1% - 3% 1% 5% - 5% - 1% 1% - 5% 1% - 2% 1% 1% 2% 1% P U B L I C O P I N I O N S T R A T E G I E SContinued
    • WORKPLACE WELLNESS INITIATIVES STUDY / 12430 / SEPTEMBER 2012 PAGE 164Table 55-1QUESTION D4:Which ONE of the following best describes the primary type of business conducted at the worksite or worksites for which you are responding?BANNER 1 ORG HEALTH ORGANIZATION SIZE PROFIT STATUS REGION EMPLOYEES W/ CARE YEARS IN OPERATION GRADE ================= ================= ======================= ================== ======================= =========== NON- 100- PRIV- PUB- PROF/ NORTH MID- 0-10 11-20 21-50 51+ TOTAL 1-99 499 500+ ATE LIC GOVT -EAST SOUTH WEST WEST 0-74% 75-84% 85%+ YRS YRS YRS YRS A/B C/D/F ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----MINING 4 - 1 3 1 3 - - 1 2 1 - - 3 1 - 2 1 2 2 1% - 1% 2% - 4% - - 1% 1% 1% - - 2% 2% - 1% 1% 1% 1%AGRICULTURE, FORESTRY, 3 1 - 2 1 1 1 - 1 2 - - - 3 1 - - 2 2 1FISHING, AND HUNTING 1% 1% - 1% - 1% 1% - 1% 1% - - - 2% 2% - - 1% 1% 1%WHOLESALE TRADE 3 1 - 2 2 1 - 1 1 1 - 1 2 - - 1 - 2 1 2 1% 1% - 1% 1% 1% - 2% 1% 1% - 1% 3% - - 2% - 1% - 1%REPAIR AND MAINTENANCE 3 - 3 - 3 - - - 3 - - 3 - - - - 3 - 1 2 1% - 2% - 1% - - - 2% - - 3% - - - - 2% - - 1% P U B L I C O P I N I O N S T R A T E G I E S
    • WORKPLACE WELLNESS INITIATIVES STUDY / 12430 / SEPTEMBER 2012 PAGE 165Table 55-2QUESTION D4:Which ONE of the following best describes the primary type of business conducted at the worksite or worksites for which you are responding?BANNER 2 WELLNESS ROLE OF IMPORTANT ISSUES (%10) HEALTH CONCERNS (COMBINED) - BENEFICIAL STATE/LOCAL GOVT ROLE OF FED GOVT ======================== =============================== ================= ================= ================= DECR LACK HIGH NOT INSU- PROD- WORK- OBES- STRESS OF CHRON BLOOD VERY/ MORE LESS NO MORE LESS NO RANCE UCTI- ABSEN- ERS ITY/ /MEN- FIT- DIS- PRE- AT ACT- ACT- CHAN- ACT- ACT- CHAN- TOTAL COSTS VITY TEEISM COMP WEIGHT TAL NESS EASE SSURE VERY SMWT ALL IVE IVE GE IVE IVE GE ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ------ ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----BASE=TOTAL SAMPLE 406 197 140 120 110 211 207 205 133 136 154 199 51 184 60 148 152 79 157 100% 49% 34% 30% 27% 52% 51% 50% 33% 33% 38% 49% 13% 45% 15% 36% 37% 19% 39%PROFESSIONAL, SCIENTIFIC, 68 23 19 13 7 27 37 41 23 24 16 39 11 28 8 32 24 13 31AND TECHNICAL SERVICES 17% 12% 14% 11% 6% 13% 18% 20% 17% 18% 10% 20% 22% 15% 13% 22% 16% 16% 20%MANUFACTURING 58 28 24 20 19 25 20 29 23 18 20 29 9 24 10 20 19 11 24 14% 14% 17% 17% 17% 12% 10% 14% 17% 13% 13% 15% 18% 13% 17% 14% 13% 14% 15%HEALTH CARE AND SOCIAL 53 26 16 19 18 32 26 29 13 17 27 22 4 29 9 13 28 7 16ASSISTANCE 13% 13% 11% 16% 16% 15% 13% 14% 10% 13% 18% 11% 8% 16% 15% 9% 18% 9% 10%FINANCE AND INSURANCE 34 13 8 6 3 22 18 19 9 17 15 15 4 15 7 12 12 10 12 8% 7% 6% 5% 3% 10% 9% 9% 7% 13% 10% 8% 8% 8% 12% 8% 8% 13% 8%EDUCATION 26 15 12 13 12 15 19 13 12 5 17 8 1 16 3 7 13 4 9 6% 8% 9% 11% 11% 7% 9% 6% 9% 4% 11% 4% 2% 9% 5% 5% 9% 5% 6%TRANSPORTATION/ 20 13 9 8 6 12 10 5 7 7 9 11 - 10 2 7 8 6 5COMMUNICATION/UTILITIES 5% 7% 6% 7% 5% 6% 5% 2% 5% 5% 6% 6% - 5% 3% 5% 5% 8% 3%RETAIL TRADE 16 6 4 1 3 10 7 10 4 4 5 9 2 7 2 6 5 2 7 4% 3% 3% 1% 3% 5% 3% 5% 3% 3% 3% 5% 4% 4% 3% 4% 3% 3% 4%RELIGIOUS, GRANT-MAKING, 16 6 5 4 3 4 12 8 8 5 5 9 2 2 4 10 5 4 7CIVIC PROFESSIONAL AND 4% 3% 4% 3% 3% 2% 6% 4% 6% 4% 3% 5% 4% 1% 7% 7% 3% 5% 4%SIMILAR ORGANIZATIONSTRANSPORTATION AND 14 7 7 7 6 7 5 4 3 6 6 6 2 8 3 2 6 4 4WAREHOUSING 3% 4% 5% 6% 5% 3% 2% 2% 2% 4% 4% 3% 4% 4% 5% 1% 4% 5% 3%ACCOMMODATION AND FOOD 14 9 4 4 7 11 5 7 3 6 2 9 3 9 1 4 6 2 5SERVICES 3% 5% 3% 3% 6% 5% 2% 3% 2% 4% 1% 5% 6% 5% 2% 3% 4% 3% 3%INFORMATION 13 5 3 2 - 5 9 7 3 3 3 6 4 4 1 7 4 2 6 3% 3% 2% 2% - 2% 4% 3% 2% 2% 2% 3% 8% 2% 2% 5% 3% 3% 4%PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION 13 11 4 4 7 9 8 7 3 4 4 8 1 9 - 4 8 1 4 3% 6% 3% 3% 6% 4% 4% 3% 2% 3% 3% 4% 2% 5% - 3% 5% 1% 3%ADMINISTRATIVE AND SUPPORT 12 8 5 5 2 8 4 6 3 5 5 5 2 4 1 7 1 3 6AND WASTE MANAGEMENT AND 3% 4% 4% 4% 2% 4% 2% 3% 2% 4% 3% 3% 4% 2% 2% 5% 1% 4% 4%REMEDIATION SERVICESARTS, ENTERTAINMENT AND 9 6 3 3 5 5 5 4 3 - 6 2 1 4 3 2 4 4 1RECREATION 2% 3% 2% 3% 5% 2% 2% 2% 2% - 4% 1% 2% 2% 5% 1% 3% 5% 1%REAL ESTATE, RENTING, AND 8 3 2 1 - 3 5 2 3 6 5 2 1 5 2 1 3 2 3LEASING 2% 2% 1% 1% - 1% 2% 1% 2% 4% 3% 1% 2% 3% 3% 1% 2% 3% 2%EDUCATIONAL SERVICES 7 4 2 1 - 6 3 3 3 1 1 5 1 2 1 2 - 2 3 2% 2% 1% 1% - 3% 1% 1% 2% 1% 1% 3% 2% 1% 2% 1% - 3% 2%CONSTRUCTION 6 5 4 3 4 2 2 3 2 2 3 2 1 1 - 4 1 - 4 1% 3% 3% 3% 4% 1% 1% 1% 2% 1% 2% 1% 2% 1% - 3% 1% - 3% P U B L I C O P I N I O N S T R A T E G I E SContinued
    • WORKPLACE WELLNESS INITIATIVES STUDY / 12430 / SEPTEMBER 2012 PAGE 166Table 55-2QUESTION D4:Which ONE of the following best describes the primary type of business conducted at the worksite or worksites for which you are responding?BANNER 2 WELLNESS ROLE OF IMPORTANT ISSUES (%10) HEALTH CONCERNS (COMBINED) - BENEFICIAL STATE/LOCAL GOVT ROLE OF FED GOVT ======================== =============================== ================= ================= ================= DECR LACK HIGH NOT INSU- PROD- WORK- OBES- STRESS OF CHRON BLOOD VERY/ MORE LESS NO MORE LESS NO RANCE UCTI- ABSEN- ERS ITY/ /MEN- FIT- DIS- PRE- AT ACT- ACT- CHAN- ACT- ACT- CHAN- TOTAL COSTS VITY TEEISM COMP WEIGHT TAL NESS EASE SSURE VERY SMWT ALL IVE IVE GE IVE IVE GE ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ------ ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----OTHER 6 2 3 2 2 2 5 4 3 2 2 3 1 2 - 3 1 - 3 1% 1% 2% 2% 2% 1% 2% 2% 2% 1% 1% 2% 2% 1% - 2% 1% - 2%MINING 4 2 3 1 2 2 2 - 2 2 1 3 - 1 - 3 1 - 3 1% 1% 2% 1% 2% 1% 1% - 2% 1% 1% 2% - 1% - 2% 1% - 2%AGRICULTURE, FORESTRY, 3 1 - - 1 1 3 1 1 - - 2 1 2 1 - 1 1 1FISHING, AND HUNTING 1% 1% - - 1% - 1% - 1% - - 1% 2% 1% 2% - 1% 1% 1%WHOLESALE TRADE 3 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 - 1 1 2 - 1 1 1 1 1 1 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% - 1% 1% 1% - 1% 2% 1% 1% 1% 1%REPAIR AND MAINTENANCE 3 3 2 2 2 1 - 1 2 1 1 2 - 1 1 1 1 - 2 1% 2% 1% 2% 2% - - - 2% 1% 1% 1% - 1% 2% 1% 1% - 1% P U B L I C O P I N I O N S T R A T E G I E S
    • WORKPLACE WELLNESS INITIATIVES STUDY / 12430 / SEPTEMBER 2012 PAGE 167Table 55-3QUESTION D4:Which ONE of the following best describes the primary type of business conducted at the worksite or worksites for which you are responding?BANNER 3 ------------------- AMONG THOSE WITH WELLNESS INITIATIVE --------------------- HAVE WELLNESS % OF YEARS FINANCIAL EMPLOYEE ACCESS INITATIVE OPERATING BUDGET IN OPERATION INCENTIVE ROI TO INITIATIVE =========== ================= ================= =========== =========== ================== 6% OR 1-2 3-4 5+ TOTAL YES NO 0-1% 2-5% MORE YRS YRS YRS YES NO YES NO 0-74% 75-84% 85%+ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ -----BASE=TOTAL SAMPLE 406 224 182 78 64 26 73 43 90 111 110 90 124 19 13 172 100% 55% 45% 35% 29% 12% 33% 19% 40% 50% 49% 40% 55% 8% 6% 77%PROFESSIONAL, SCIENTIFIC, 68 25 43 11 8 1 7 7 11 7 18 7 17 2 2 21AND TECHNICAL SERVICES 17% 11% 24% 14% 13% 4% 10% 16% 12% 6% 16% 8% 14% 11% 15% 12%MANUFACTURING 58 35 23 13 13 4 12 7 15 16 19 15 20 3 1 30 14% 16% 13% 17% 20% 15% 16% 16% 17% 14% 17% 17% 16% 16% 8% 17%HEALTH CARE AND SOCIAL 53 30 23 13 10 1 16 2 11 15 15 14 16 5 4 18ASSISTANCE 13% 13% 13% 17% 16% 4% 22% 5% 12% 14% 14% 16% 13% 26% 31% 10%FINANCE AND INSURANCE 34 20 14 8 4 2 7 5 7 11 9 6 14 - - 19 8% 9% 8% 10% 6% 8% 10% 12% 8% 10% 8% 7% 11% - - 11%EDUCATION 26 18 8 6 6 1 4 4 8 6 12 6 11 2 2 14 6% 8% 4% 8% 9% 4% 5% 9% 9% 5% 11% 7% 9% 11% 15% 8%TRANSPORTATION/ 20 15 5 5 2 4 2 - 10 8 7 7 8 2 - 12COMMUNICATION/UTILITIES 5% 7% 3% 6% 3% 15% 3% - 11% 7% 6% 8% 6% 11% - 7%RETAIL TRADE 16 11 5 3 5 - 2 3 4 7 4 5 6 1 1 8 4% 5% 3% 4% 8% - 3% 7% 4% 6% 4% 6% 5% 5% 8% 5%RELIGIOUS, GRANT-MAKING, 16 5 11 3 1 - 4 - 1 3 2 2 3 - - 5CIVIC PROFESSIONAL AND 4% 2% 6% 4% 2% - 5% - 1% 3% 2% 2% 2% - - 3%SIMILAR ORGANIZATIONSTRANSPORTATION AND 14 12 2 3 3 4 3 1 7 7 4 7 4 - - 11WAREHOUSING 3% 5% 1% 4% 5% 15% 4% 2% 8% 6% 4% 8% 3% - - 6%ACCOMMODATION AND FOOD 14 12 2 2 3 2 1 6 2 7 5 4 8 1 1 8SERVICES 3% 5% 1% 3% 5% 8% 1% 14% 2% 6% 5% 4% 6% 5% 8% 5%INFORMATION 13 5 8 1 1 1 1 - 3 1 3 2 2 - - 3 3% 2% 4% 1% 2% 4% 1% - 3% 1% 3% 2% 2% - - 2%PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION 13 10 3 2 3 1 5 3 1 5 5 4 3 - 1 8 3% 4% 2% 3% 5% 4% 7% 7% 1% 5% 5% 4% 2% - 8% 5%ADMINISTRATIVE AND SUPPORT 12 4 8 1 - 1 1 1 1 3 1 1 3 - - 2AND WASTE MANAGEMENT AND 3% 2% 4% 1% - 4% 1% 2% 1% 3% 1% 1% 2% - - 1%REMEDIATION SERVICESARTS, ENTERTAINMENT AND 9 4 5 1 - 1 1 1 2 3 1 2 2 - - 2RECREATION 2% 2% 3% 1% - 4% 1% 2% 2% 3% 1% 2% 2% - - 1%REAL ESTATE, RENTING, AND 8 4 4 2 1 1 4 - - 2 2 2 2 - - 4LEASING 2% 2% 2% 3% 2% 4% 5% - - 2% 2% 2% 2% - - 2%EDUCATIONAL SERVICES 7 3 4 2 - 1 - 1 2 3 - 1 1 - - 2 2% 1% 2% 3% - 4% - 2% 2% 3% - 1% 1% - - 1%CONSTRUCTION 6 2 4 - 1 - - 1 1 1 1 1 1 - - 1 1% 1% 2% - 2% - - 2% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% - - 1% P U B L I C O P I N I O N S T R A T E G I E SContinued
    • WORKPLACE WELLNESS INITIATIVES STUDY / 12430 / SEPTEMBER 2012 PAGE 168Table 55-3QUESTION D4:Which ONE of the following best describes the primary type of business conducted at the worksite or worksites for which you are responding?BANNER 3 ------------------- AMONG THOSE WITH WELLNESS INITIATIVE --------------------- HAVE WELLNESS % OF YEARS FINANCIAL EMPLOYEE ACCESS INITATIVE OPERATING BUDGET IN OPERATION INCENTIVE ROI TO INITIATIVE =========== ================= ================= =========== =========== ================== 6% OR 1-2 3-4 5+ TOTAL YES NO 0-1% 2-5% MORE YRS YRS YRS YES NO YES NO 0-74% 75-84% 85%+ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ -----OTHER 6 4 2 - 2 - 2 - 1 2 1 3 - 1 1 1 1% 2% 1% - 3% - 3% - 1% 2% 1% 3% - 5% 8% 1%MINING 4 1 3 - - 1 - 1 - 1 - - 1 1 - - 1% - 2% - - 4% - 2% - 1% - - 1% 5% - -AGRICULTURE, FORESTRY, 3 1 2 - - - - - 1 1 - - - - - 1FISHING, AND HUNTING 1% - 1% - - - - - 1% 1% - - - - - 1%WHOLESALE TRADE 3 2 1 1 1 - 1 - 1 1 1 1 1 1 - 1 1% 1% 1% 1% 2% - 1% - 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 5% - 1%REPAIR AND MAINTENANCE 3 1 2 1 - - - - 1 1 - - 1 - - 1 1% - 1% 1% - - - - 1% 1% - - 1% - - 1% P U B L I C O P I N I O N S T R A T E G I E S
    • WORKPLACE WELLNESS INITIATIVES STUDY / 12430 / SEPTEMBER 2012 PAGE 169Table 56-1Organization Size.BANNER 1 ORG HEALTH ORGANIZATION SIZE PROFIT STATUS REGION EMPLOYEES W/ CARE YEARS IN OPERATION GRADE ================= ================= ======================= ================== ======================= =========== NON- 100- PRIV- PUB- PROF/ NORTH MID- 0-10 11-20 21-50 51+ TOTAL 1-99 499 500+ ATE LIC GOVT -EAST SOUTH WEST WEST 0-74% 75-84% 85%+ YRS YRS YRS YRS A/B C/D/F ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----BASE=TOTAL SAMPLE 406 113 124 169 212 77 117 61 129 140 76 108 79 169 46 61 144 135 234 169 100% 28% 31% 42% 52% 19% 29% 15% 32% 34% 19% 27% 19% 42% 11% 15% 35% 33% 58% 42%1-99 113 113 - - 80 5 28 13 37 37 26 26 17 56 20 27 35 29 83 30 28% 100% - - 38% 6% 24% 21% 29% 26% 34% 24% 22% 33% 43% 44% 24% 21% 35% 18%100-499 124 - 124 - 73 6 45 24 42 38 20 39 29 45 13 20 55 32 69 53 31% - 100% - 34% 8% 38% 39% 33% 27% 26% 36% 37% 27% 28% 33% 38% 24% 29% 31%500-2,499 59 - - 59 29 12 18 12 13 23 11 15 14 25 7 7 19 24 26 33 15% - - 35% 14% 16% 15% 20% 10% 16% 14% 14% 18% 15% 15% 11% 13% 18% 11% 20%2,500-24,999 80 - - 80 24 32 24 8 28 29 15 21 15 30 4 5 27 36 40 39 20% - - 47% 11% 42% 21% 13% 22% 21% 20% 19% 19% 18% 9% 8% 19% 27% 17% 23%25,000+ 30 - - 30 6 22 2 4 9 13 4 7 4 13 2 2 8 14 16 14 7% - - 18% 3% 29% 2% 7% 7% 9% 5% 6% 5% 8% 4% 3% 6% 10% 7% 8% P U B L I C O P I N I O N S T R A T E G I E S
    • WORKPLACE WELLNESS INITIATIVES STUDY / 12430 / SEPTEMBER 2012 PAGE 170Table 56-2Organization Size.BANNER 2 WELLNESS ROLE OF IMPORTANT ISSUES (%10) HEALTH CONCERNS (COMBINED) - BENEFICIAL STATE/LOCAL GOVT ROLE OF FED GOVT ======================== =============================== ================= ================= ================= DECR LACK HIGH NOT INSU- PROD- WORK- OBES- STRESS OF CHRON BLOOD VERY/ MORE LESS NO MORE LESS NO RANCE UCTI- ABSEN- ERS ITY/ /MEN- FIT- DIS- PRE- AT ACT- ACT- CHAN- ACT- ACT- CHAN- TOTAL COSTS VITY TEEISM COMP WEIGHT TAL NESS EASE SSURE VERY SMWT ALL IVE IVE GE IVE IVE GE ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ------ ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----BASE=TOTAL SAMPLE 406 197 140 120 110 211 207 205 133 136 154 199 51 184 60 148 152 79 157 100% 49% 34% 30% 27% 52% 51% 50% 33% 33% 38% 49% 13% 45% 15% 36% 37% 19% 39%1-99 113 54 41 36 21 45 54 61 35 34 29 60 23 50 17 44 40 26 44 28% 27% 29% 30% 19% 21% 26% 30% 26% 25% 19% 30% 45% 27% 28% 30% 26% 33% 28%100-499 124 63 42 33 38 66 61 62 39 42 48 60 15 62 16 39 50 22 46 31% 32% 30% 28% 35% 31% 29% 30% 29% 31% 31% 30% 29% 34% 27% 26% 33% 28% 29%500-2,499 59 23 16 15 15 36 29 30 26 21 26 25 8 26 7 26 22 9 28 15% 12% 11% 13% 14% 17% 14% 15% 20% 15% 17% 13% 16% 14% 12% 18% 14% 11% 18%2,500-24,999 80 43 30 26 26 50 46 36 27 28 41 37 2 36 12 28 31 14 27 20% 22% 21% 22% 24% 24% 22% 18% 20% 21% 27% 19% 4% 20% 20% 19% 20% 18% 17%25,000+ 30 14 11 10 10 14 17 16 6 11 10 17 3 10 8 11 9 8 12 7% 7% 8% 8% 9% 7% 8% 8% 5% 8% 6% 9% 6% 5% 13% 7% 6% 10% 8% P U B L I C O P I N I O N S T R A T E G I E S
    • WORKPLACE WELLNESS INITIATIVES STUDY / 12430 / SEPTEMBER 2012 PAGE 171Table 56-3Organization Size.BANNER 3 ------------------- AMONG THOSE WITH WELLNESS INITIATIVE --------------------- HAVE WELLNESS % OF YEARS FINANCIAL EMPLOYEE ACCESS INITATIVE OPERATING BUDGET IN OPERATION INCENTIVE ROI TO INITIATIVE =========== ================= ================= =========== =========== ================== 6% OR 1-2 3-4 5+ TOTAL YES NO 0-1% 2-5% MORE YRS YRS YRS YES NO YES NO 0-74% 75-84% 85%+ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ -----BASE=TOTAL SAMPLE 406 224 182 78 64 26 73 43 90 111 110 90 124 19 13 172 100% 55% 45% 35% 29% 12% 33% 19% 40% 50% 49% 40% 55% 8% 6% 77%1-99 113 31 82 15 8 2 13 6 11 11 19 9 21 2 - 27 28% 14% 45% 19% 13% 8% 18% 14% 12% 10% 17% 10% 17% 11% - 16%100-499 124 65 59 32 18 4 24 10 30 29 34 10 51 2 4 54 31% 29% 32% 41% 28% 15% 33% 23% 33% 26% 31% 11% 41% 11% 31% 31%500-2,499 59 37 22 10 10 8 15 7 13 20 17 17 20 7 1 28 15% 17% 12% 13% 16% 31% 21% 16% 14% 18% 15% 19% 16% 37% 8% 16%2,500-24,999 80 64 16 16 21 7 19 18 20 37 27 37 24 5 6 46 20% 29% 9% 21% 33% 27% 26% 42% 22% 33% 25% 41% 19% 26% 46% 27%25,000+ 30 27 3 5 7 5 2 2 16 14 13 17 8 3 2 17 7% 12% 2% 6% 11% 19% 3% 5% 18% 13% 12% 19% 6% 16% 15% 10% P U B L I C O P I N I O N S T R A T E G I E S
    • WORKPLACE WELLNESS INITIATIVES STUDY / 12430 / SEPTEMBER 2012 PAGE 172Table 57-1Profit Status.BANNER 1 ORG HEALTH ORGANIZATION SIZE PROFIT STATUS REGION EMPLOYEES W/ CARE YEARS IN OPERATION GRADE ================= ================= ======================= ================== ======================= =========== NON- 100- PRIV- PUB- PROF/ NORTH MID- 0-10 11-20 21-50 51+ TOTAL 1-99 499 500+ ATE LIC GOVT -EAST SOUTH WEST WEST 0-74% 75-84% 85%+ YRS YRS YRS YRS A/B C/D/F ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----BASE=TOTAL SAMPLE 406 113 124 169 212 77 117 61 129 140 76 108 79 169 46 61 144 135 234 169 100% 28% 31% 42% 52% 19% 29% 15% 32% 34% 19% 27% 19% 42% 11% 15% 35% 33% 58% 42%PUBLICLY OWNED FOR-PROFIT 77 5 6 66 - 77 - 16 21 28 12 15 12 40 7 6 31 29 47 29 19% 4% 5% 39% - 100% - 26% 16% 20% 16% 14% 15% 24% 15% 10% 22% 21% 20% 17%PRIVATELY OWNED FOR-PROFIT 212 80 73 59 212 - - 31 69 72 40 60 43 81 39 48 76 40 126 84 52% 71% 59% 35% 100% - - 51% 53% 51% 53% 56% 54% 48% 85% 79% 53% 30% 54% 50%NONPROFIT ORGANIZATION 87 26 37 24 - - 87 12 27 31 17 30 16 34 - 7 29 48 49 38 21% 23% 30% 14% - - 74% 20% 21% 22% 22% 28% 20% 20% - 11% 20% 36% 21% 22%GOVERNMENT AGENCY 30 2 8 20 - - 30 2 12 9 7 3 8 14 - - 8 18 12 18 7% 2% 6% 12% - - 26% 3% 9% 6% 9% 3% 10% 8% - - 6% 13% 5% 11% P U B L I C O P I N I O N S T R A T E G I E S
    • WORKPLACE WELLNESS INITIATIVES STUDY / 12430 / SEPTEMBER 2012 PAGE 173Table 57-2Profit Status.BANNER 2 WELLNESS ROLE OF IMPORTANT ISSUES (%10) HEALTH CONCERNS (COMBINED) - BENEFICIAL STATE/LOCAL GOVT ROLE OF FED GOVT ======================== =============================== ================= ================= ================= DECR LACK HIGH NOT INSU- PROD- WORK- OBES- STRESS OF CHRON BLOOD VERY/ MORE LESS NO MORE LESS NO RANCE UCTI- ABSEN- ERS ITY/ /MEN- FIT- DIS- PRE- AT ACT- ACT- CHAN- ACT- ACT- CHAN- TOTAL COSTS VITY TEEISM COMP WEIGHT TAL NESS EASE SSURE VERY SMWT ALL IVE IVE GE IVE IVE GE ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ------ ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----BASE=TOTAL SAMPLE 406 197 140 120 110 211 207 205 133 136 154 199 51 184 60 148 152 79 157 100% 49% 34% 30% 27% 52% 51% 50% 33% 33% 38% 49% 13% 45% 15% 36% 37% 19% 39%PUBLICLY OWNED FOR-PROFIT 77 34 27 17 14 39 42 35 27 27 27 44 6 29 12 34 21 15 35 19% 17% 19% 14% 13% 18% 20% 17% 20% 20% 18% 22% 12% 16% 20% 23% 14% 19% 22%PRIVATELY OWNED FOR-PROFIT 212 104 76 61 63 102 99 116 59 75 77 97 36 94 32 78 78 41 85 52% 53% 54% 51% 57% 48% 48% 57% 44% 55% 50% 49% 71% 51% 53% 53% 51% 52% 54%NONPROFIT ORGANIZATION 87 44 28 31 23 48 51 40 34 24 32 47 8 44 13 26 37 19 27 21% 22% 20% 26% 21% 23% 25% 20% 26% 18% 21% 24% 16% 24% 22% 18% 24% 24% 17%GOVERNMENT AGENCY 30 15 9 11 10 22 15 14 13 10 18 11 1 17 3 10 16 4 10 7% 8% 6% 9% 9% 10% 7% 7% 10% 7% 12% 6% 2% 9% 5% 7% 11% 5% 6% P U B L I C O P I N I O N S T R A T E G I E S
    • WORKPLACE WELLNESS INITIATIVES STUDY / 12430 / SEPTEMBER 2012 PAGE 174Table 57-3Profit Status.BANNER 3 ------------------- AMONG THOSE WITH WELLNESS INITIATIVE --------------------- HAVE WELLNESS % OF YEARS FINANCIAL EMPLOYEE ACCESS INITATIVE OPERATING BUDGET IN OPERATION INCENTIVE ROI TO INITIATIVE =========== ================= ================= =========== =========== ================== 6% OR 1-2 3-4 5+ TOTAL YES NO 0-1% 2-5% MORE YRS YRS YRS YES NO YES NO 0-74% 75-84% 85%+ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ -----BASE=TOTAL SAMPLE 406 224 182 78 64 26 73 43 90 111 110 90 124 19 13 172 100% 55% 45% 35% 29% 12% 33% 19% 40% 50% 49% 40% 55% 8% 6% 77%PUBLICLY OWNED FOR-PROFIT 77 58 19 13 19 12 13 9 28 30 28 35 22 7 2 42 19% 26% 10% 17% 30% 46% 18% 21% 31% 27% 25% 39% 18% 37% 15% 24%PRIVATELY OWNED FOR-PROFIT 212 95 117 37 30 8 36 21 34 44 48 32 57 8 5 75 52% 42% 64% 47% 47% 31% 49% 49% 38% 40% 44% 36% 46% 42% 38% 44%NONPROFIT ORGANIZATION 87 46 41 21 10 3 17 8 19 26 20 13 32 3 3 36 21% 21% 23% 27% 16% 12% 23% 19% 21% 23% 18% 14% 26% 16% 23% 21%GOVERNMENT AGENCY 30 25 5 7 5 3 7 5 9 11 14 10 13 1 3 19 7% 11% 3% 9% 8% 12% 10% 12% 10% 10% 13% 11% 10% 5% 23% 11% P U B L I C O P I N I O N S T R A T E G I E S
    • WORKPLACE WELLNESS INITIATIVES STUDY / 12430 / SEPTEMBER 2012 PAGE 175Table 58-1QUESTION REGION:Region.BANNER 1 ORG HEALTH ORGANIZATION SIZE PROFIT STATUS REGION EMPLOYEES W/ CARE YEARS IN OPERATION GRADE ================= ================= ======================= ================== ======================= =========== NON- 100- PRIV- PUB- PROF/ NORTH MID- 0-10 11-20 21-50 51+ TOTAL 1-99 499 500+ ATE LIC GOVT -EAST SOUTH WEST WEST 0-74% 75-84% 85%+ YRS YRS YRS YRS A/B C/D/F ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----BASE=TOTAL SAMPLE 406 113 124 169 212 77 117 61 129 140 76 108 79 169 46 61 144 135 234 169 100% 28% 31% 42% 52% 19% 29% 15% 32% 34% 19% 27% 19% 42% 11% 15% 35% 33% 58% 42%NORTHEAST 61 13 24 24 31 16 14 61 - - - 21 14 22 6 10 24 19 41 20 15% 12% 19% 14% 15% 21% 12% 100% - - - 19% 18% 13% 13% 16% 17% 14% 18% 12%SOUTH 129 37 42 50 69 21 39 - 129 - - 34 25 54 12 24 52 35 70 57 32% 33% 34% 30% 33% 27% 33% - 100% - - 31% 32% 32% 26% 39% 36% 26% 30% 34%MIDWEST 140 37 38 65 72 28 40 - - 140 - 37 23 61 16 15 46 56 75 64 34% 33% 31% 38% 34% 36% 34% - - 100% - 34% 29% 36% 35% 25% 32% 41% 32% 38%WEST 76 26 20 30 40 12 24 - - - 76 16 17 32 12 12 22 25 48 28 19% 23% 16% 18% 19% 16% 21% - - - 100% 15% 22% 19% 26% 20% 15% 19% 21% 17% P U B L I C O P I N I O N S T R A T E G I E S
    • WORKPLACE WELLNESS INITIATIVES STUDY / 12430 / SEPTEMBER 2012 PAGE 176Table 58-2QUESTION REGION:Region.BANNER 2 WELLNESS ROLE OF IMPORTANT ISSUES (%10) HEALTH CONCERNS (COMBINED) - BENEFICIAL STATE/LOCAL GOVT ROLE OF FED GOVT ======================== =============================== ================= ================= ================= DECR LACK HIGH NOT INSU- PROD- WORK- OBES- STRESS OF CHRON BLOOD VERY/ MORE LESS NO MORE LESS NO RANCE UCTI- ABSEN- ERS ITY/ /MEN- FIT- DIS- PRE- AT ACT- ACT- CHAN- ACT- ACT- CHAN- TOTAL COSTS VITY TEEISM COMP WEIGHT TAL NESS EASE SSURE VERY SMWT ALL IVE IVE GE IVE IVE GE ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ------ ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----BASE=TOTAL SAMPLE 406 197 140 120 110 211 207 205 133 136 154 199 51 184 60 148 152 79 157 100% 49% 34% 30% 27% 52% 51% 50% 33% 33% 38% 49% 13% 45% 15% 36% 37% 19% 39%NORTHEAST 61 26 19 16 13 31 28 35 24 20 21 29 11 31 11 18 25 13 22 15% 13% 14% 13% 12% 15% 14% 17% 18% 15% 14% 15% 22% 17% 18% 12% 16% 16% 14%SOUTH 129 61 42 34 31 68 63 57 41 54 45 61 23 58 18 46 47 20 54 32% 31% 30% 28% 28% 32% 30% 28% 31% 40% 29% 31% 45% 32% 30% 31% 31% 25% 34%MIDWEST 140 69 47 46 39 76 73 74 44 44 52 78 9 61 20 57 48 29 60 34% 35% 34% 38% 35% 36% 35% 36% 33% 32% 34% 39% 18% 33% 33% 39% 32% 37% 38%WEST 76 41 32 24 27 36 43 39 24 18 36 31 8 34 11 27 32 17 21 19% 21% 23% 20% 25% 17% 21% 19% 18% 13% 23% 16% 16% 18% 18% 18% 21% 22% 13% P U B L I C O P I N I O N S T R A T E G I E S
    • WORKPLACE WELLNESS INITIATIVES STUDY / 12430 / SEPTEMBER 2012 PAGE 177Table 58-3QUESTION REGION:Region.BANNER 3 ------------------- AMONG THOSE WITH WELLNESS INITIATIVE --------------------- HAVE WELLNESS % OF YEARS FINANCIAL EMPLOYEE ACCESS INITATIVE OPERATING BUDGET IN OPERATION INCENTIVE ROI TO INITIATIVE =========== ================= ================= =========== =========== ================== 6% OR 1-2 3-4 5+ TOTAL YES NO 0-1% 2-5% MORE YRS YRS YRS YES NO YES NO 0-74% 75-84% 85%+ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ -----BASE=TOTAL SAMPLE 406 224 182 78 64 26 73 43 90 111 110 90 124 19 13 172 100% 55% 45% 35% 29% 12% 33% 19% 40% 50% 49% 40% 55% 8% 6% 77%NORTHEAST 61 29 32 14 8 2 12 6 10 13 16 14 15 6 2 20 15% 13% 18% 18% 13% 8% 16% 14% 11% 12% 15% 16% 12% 32% 15% 12%SOUTH 129 71 58 18 22 10 24 16 25 27 43 27 40 4 6 54 32% 32% 32% 23% 34% 38% 33% 37% 28% 24% 39% 30% 32% 21% 46% 31%MIDWEST 140 81 59 30 23 8 23 14 38 49 31 28 49 6 2 67 34% 36% 32% 38% 36% 31% 32% 33% 42% 44% 28% 31% 40% 32% 15% 39%WEST 76 43 33 16 11 6 14 7 17 22 20 21 20 3 3 31 19% 19% 18% 21% 17% 23% 19% 16% 19% 20% 18% 23% 16% 16% 23% 18% P U B L I C O P I N I O N S T R A T E G I E S
    • WORKPLACE WELLNESS INITIATIVES STUDY / 12430 / SEPTEMBER 2012 PAGE 178Table 59-1QUESTION ORG:Does your organization have U.S. based operations [i.e., business units] only or does it operate multinationally?BANNER 1 ORG HEALTH ORGANIZATION SIZE PROFIT STATUS REGION EMPLOYEES W/ CARE YEARS IN OPERATION GRADE ================= ================= ======================= ================== ======================= =========== NON- 100- PRIV- PUB- PROF/ NORTH MID- 0-10 11-20 21-50 51+ TOTAL 1-99 499 500+ ATE LIC GOVT -EAST SOUTH WEST WEST 0-74% 75-84% 85%+ YRS YRS YRS YRS A/B C/D/F ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----BASE=TOTAL SAMPLE 406 113 124 169 212 77 117 61 129 140 76 108 79 169 46 61 144 135 234 169 100% 28% 31% 42% 52% 19% 29% 15% 32% 34% 19% 27% 19% 42% 11% 15% 35% 33% 58% 42%U.S. BASED OPERATIONS ONLY 294 98 106 90 161 21 112 41 89 103 61 89 57 115 37 46 99 97 165 127 72% 87% 85% 53% 76% 27% 96% 67% 69% 74% 80% 82% 72% 68% 80% 75% 69% 72% 71% 75%MULTINATIONAL OPERATIONS 112 15 18 79 51 56 5 20 40 37 15 19 22 54 9 15 45 38 69 42 28% 13% 15% 47% 24% 73% 4% 33% 31% 26% 20% 18% 28% 32% 20% 25% 31% 28% 29% 25% P U B L I C O P I N I O N S T R A T E G I E S
    • WORKPLACE WELLNESS INITIATIVES STUDY / 12430 / SEPTEMBER 2012 PAGE 179Table 59-2QUESTION ORG:Does your organization have U.S. based operations [i.e., business units] only or does it operate multinationally?BANNER 2 WELLNESS ROLE OF IMPORTANT ISSUES (%10) HEALTH CONCERNS (COMBINED) - BENEFICIAL STATE/LOCAL GOVT ROLE OF FED GOVT ======================== =============================== ================= ================= ================= DECR LACK HIGH NOT INSU- PROD- WORK- OBES- STRESS OF CHRON BLOOD VERY/ MORE LESS NO MORE LESS NO RANCE UCTI- ABSEN- ERS ITY/ /MEN- FIT- DIS- PRE- AT ACT- ACT- CHAN- ACT- ACT- CHAN- TOTAL COSTS VITY TEEISM COMP WEIGHT TAL NESS EASE SSURE VERY SMWT ALL IVE IVE GE IVE IVE GE ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ------ ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----BASE=TOTAL SAMPLE 406 197 140 120 110 211 207 205 133 136 154 199 51 184 60 148 152 79 157 100% 49% 34% 30% 27% 52% 51% 50% 33% 33% 38% 49% 13% 45% 15% 36% 37% 19% 39%U.S. BASED OPERATIONS ONLY 294 146 98 89 79 162 146 145 97 92 118 139 35 134 43 106 113 60 110 72% 74% 70% 74% 72% 77% 71% 71% 73% 68% 77% 70% 69% 73% 72% 72% 74% 76% 70%MULTINATIONAL OPERATIONS 112 51 42 31 31 49 61 60 36 44 36 60 16 50 17 42 39 19 47 28% 26% 30% 26% 28% 23% 29% 29% 27% 32% 23% 30% 31% 27% 28% 28% 26% 24% 30% P U B L I C O P I N I O N S T R A T E G I E S
    • WORKPLACE WELLNESS INITIATIVES STUDY / 12430 / SEPTEMBER 2012 PAGE 180Table 59-3QUESTION ORG:Does your organization have U.S. based operations [i.e., business units] only or does it operate multinationally?BANNER 3 ------------------- AMONG THOSE WITH WELLNESS INITIATIVE --------------------- HAVE WELLNESS % OF YEARS FINANCIAL EMPLOYEE ACCESS INITATIVE OPERATING BUDGET IN OPERATION INCENTIVE ROI TO INITIATIVE =========== ================= ================= =========== =========== ================== 6% OR 1-2 3-4 5+ TOTAL YES NO 0-1% 2-5% MORE YRS YRS YRS YES NO YES NO 0-74% 75-84% 85%+ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ -----BASE=TOTAL SAMPLE 406 224 182 78 64 26 73 43 90 111 110 90 124 19 13 172 100% 55% 45% 35% 29% 12% 33% 19% 40% 50% 49% 40% 55% 8% 6% 77%U.S. BASED OPERATIONS ONLY 294 149 145 56 42 16 59 25 56 76 70 52 90 13 9 115 72% 67% 80% 72% 66% 62% 81% 58% 62% 68% 64% 58% 73% 68% 69% 67%MULTINATIONAL OPERATIONS 112 75 37 22 22 10 14 18 34 35 40 38 34 6 4 57 28% 33% 20% 28% 34% 38% 19% 42% 38% 32% 36% 42% 27% 32% 31% 33% P U B L I C O P I N I O N S T R A T E G I E S
    • WORKPLACE WELLNESS INITIATIVES STUDY / 12430 / SEPTEMBER 2012 PAGE 181Table 60-1QUESTION UNIT:In the U.S., is your organization a single-unit organization or a multi-unit organization?BANNER 1 ORG HEALTH ORGANIZATION SIZE PROFIT STATUS REGION EMPLOYEES W/ CARE YEARS IN OPERATION GRADE ================= ================= ======================= ================== ======================= =========== NON- 100- PRIV- PUB- PROF/ NORTH MID- 0-10 11-20 21-50 51+ TOTAL 1-99 499 500+ ATE LIC GOVT -EAST SOUTH WEST WEST 0-74% 75-84% 85%+ YRS YRS YRS YRS A/B C/D/F ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----BASE=TOTAL SAMPLE 406 113 124 169 212 77 117 61 129 140 76 108 79 169 46 61 144 135 234 169 100% 28% 31% 42% 52% 19% 29% 15% 32% 34% 19% 27% 19% 42% 11% 15% 35% 33% 58% 42%SINGLE-UNIT ORGANIZATION 146 84 45 17 95 6 45 18 47 50 31 34 27 63 20 26 50 43 98 46 36% 74% 36% 10% 45% 8% 38% 30% 36% 36% 41% 31% 34% 37% 43% 43% 35% 32% 42% 27%MULTI-UNIT ORGANIZATION 260 29 79 152 117 71 72 43 82 90 45 74 52 106 26 35 94 92 136 123 64% 26% 64% 90% 55% 92% 62% 70% 64% 64% 59% 69% 66% 63% 57% 57% 65% 68% 58% 73% P U B L I C O P I N I O N S T R A T E G I E S
    • WORKPLACE WELLNESS INITIATIVES STUDY / 12430 / SEPTEMBER 2012 PAGE 182Table 60-2QUESTION UNIT:In the U.S., is your organization a single-unit organization or a multi-unit organization?BANNER 2 WELLNESS ROLE OF IMPORTANT ISSUES (%10) HEALTH CONCERNS (COMBINED) - BENEFICIAL STATE/LOCAL GOVT ROLE OF FED GOVT ======================== =============================== ================= ================= ================= DECR LACK HIGH NOT INSU- PROD- WORK- OBES- STRESS OF CHRON BLOOD VERY/ MORE LESS NO MORE LESS NO RANCE UCTI- ABSEN- ERS ITY/ /MEN- FIT- DIS- PRE- AT ACT- ACT- CHAN- ACT- ACT- CHAN- TOTAL COSTS VITY TEEISM COMP WEIGHT TAL NESS EASE SSURE VERY SMWT ALL IVE IVE GE IVE IVE GE ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ------ ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----BASE=TOTAL SAMPLE 406 197 140 120 110 211 207 205 133 136 154 199 51 184 60 148 152 79 157 100% 49% 34% 30% 27% 52% 51% 50% 33% 33% 38% 49% 13% 45% 15% 36% 37% 19% 39%SINGLE-UNIT ORGANIZATION 146 75 49 50 41 68 65 79 51 36 46 75 23 66 19 52 58 26 53 36% 38% 35% 42% 37% 32% 31% 39% 38% 26% 30% 38% 45% 36% 32% 35% 38% 33% 34%MULTI-UNIT ORGANIZATION 260 122 91 70 69 143 142 126 82 100 108 124 28 118 41 96 94 53 104 64% 62% 65% 58% 63% 68% 69% 61% 62% 74% 70% 62% 55% 64% 68% 65% 62% 67% 66% P U B L I C O P I N I O N S T R A T E G I E S
    • WORKPLACE WELLNESS INITIATIVES STUDY / 12430 / SEPTEMBER 2012 PAGE 183Table 60-3QUESTION UNIT:In the U.S., is your organization a single-unit organization or a multi-unit organization?BANNER 3 ------------------- AMONG THOSE WITH WELLNESS INITIATIVE --------------------- HAVE WELLNESS % OF YEARS FINANCIAL EMPLOYEE ACCESS INITATIVE OPERATING BUDGET IN OPERATION INCENTIVE ROI TO INITIATIVE =========== ================= ================= =========== =========== ================== 6% OR 1-2 3-4 5+ TOTAL YES NO 0-1% 2-5% MORE YRS YRS YRS YES NO YES NO 0-74% 75-84% 85%+ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ -----BASE=TOTAL SAMPLE 406 224 182 78 64 26 73 43 90 111 110 90 124 19 13 172 100% 55% 45% 35% 29% 12% 33% 19% 40% 50% 49% 40% 55% 8% 6% 77%SINGLE-UNIT ORGANIZATION 146 59 87 21 15 7 19 9 26 20 36 11 42 3 3 45 36% 26% 48% 27% 23% 27% 26% 21% 29% 18% 33% 12% 34% 16% 23% 26%MULTI-UNIT ORGANIZATION 260 165 95 57 49 19 54 34 64 91 74 79 82 16 10 127 64% 74% 52% 73% 77% 73% 74% 79% 71% 82% 67% 88% 66% 84% 77% 74% P U B L I C O P I N I O N S T R A T E G I E S
    • WORKPLACE WELLNESS INITIATIVES STUDY / 12430 / SEPTEMBER 2012 PAGE 184Table 61-1QUESTION HRP:For multi-unit organizations, are HR policies and practices determined by the multi-unit headquarters, by each work location, or a combination of both?BANNER 1 ORG HEALTH ORGANIZATION SIZE PROFIT STATUS REGION EMPLOYEES W/ CARE YEARS IN OPERATION GRADE ================= ================= ======================= ================== ======================= =========== NON- 100- PRIV- PUB- PROF/ NORTH MID- 0-10 11-20 21-50 51+ TOTAL 1-99 499 500+ ATE LIC GOVT -EAST SOUTH WEST WEST 0-74% 75-84% 85%+ YRS YRS YRS YRS A/B C/D/F ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----BASE=MULTI-UNIT 260 29 79 152 117 71 72 43 82 90 45 74 52 106 26 35 94 92 136 123 100% 11% 30% 58% 45% 27% 28% 17% 32% 35% 17% 28% 20% 41% 10% 13% 36% 35% 52% 47%MULTI-UNIT CORPORATE 139 14 56 69 62 29 48 27 46 40 26 45 25 58 17 19 58 40 77 62HEADQUARTERS 53% 48% 71% 45% 53% 41% 67% 63% 56% 44% 58% 61% 48% 55% 65% 54% 62% 43% 57% 50%EACH WORK LOCATION 5 1 3 1 2 1 2 1 1 1 2 1 2 1 1 1 - 3 2 3 2% 3% 4% 1% 2% 1% 3% 2% 1% 1% 4% 1% 4% 1% 4% 3% - 3% 1% 2%A COMBINATION OF BOTH 116 14 20 82 53 41 22 15 35 49 17 28 25 47 8 15 36 49 57 58 45% 48% 25% 54% 45% 58% 31% 35% 43% 54% 38% 38% 48% 44% 31% 43% 38% 53% 42% 47% P U B L I C O P I N I O N S T R A T E G I E S
    • WORKPLACE WELLNESS INITIATIVES STUDY / 12430 / SEPTEMBER 2012 PAGE 185Table 61-2QUESTION HRP:For multi-unit organizations, are HR policies and practices determined by the multi-unit headquarters, by each work location, or a combination of both?BANNER 2 WELLNESS ROLE OF IMPORTANT ISSUES (%10) HEALTH CONCERNS (COMBINED) - BENEFICIAL STATE/LOCAL GOVT ROLE OF FED GOVT ======================== =============================== ================= ================= ================= DECR LACK HIGH NOT INSU- PROD- WORK- OBES- STRESS OF CHRON BLOOD VERY/ MORE LESS NO MORE LESS NO RANCE UCTI- ABSEN- ERS ITY/ /MEN- FIT- DIS- PRE- AT ACT- ACT- CHAN- ACT- ACT- CHAN- TOTAL COSTS VITY TEEISM COMP WEIGHT TAL NESS EASE SSURE VERY SMWT ALL IVE IVE GE IVE IVE GE ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ------ ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----BASE=MULTI-UNIT 260 122 91 70 69 143 142 126 82 100 108 124 28 118 41 96 94 53 104 100% 47% 35% 27% 27% 55% 55% 48% 32% 38% 42% 48% 11% 45% 16% 37% 36% 20% 40%MULTI-UNIT CORPORATE 139 62 43 36 33 78 77 65 48 56 54 66 19 68 23 46 55 28 56HEADQUARTERS 53% 51% 47% 51% 48% 55% 54% 52% 59% 56% 50% 53% 68% 58% 56% 48% 59% 53% 54%EACH WORK LOCATION 5 4 2 2 3 3 3 2 2 2 2 3 - 3 - 1 1 2 1 2% 3% 2% 3% 4% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% - 3% - 1% 1% 4% 1%A COMBINATION OF BOTH 116 56 46 32 33 62 62 59 32 42 52 55 9 47 18 49 38 23 47 45% 46% 51% 46% 48% 43% 44% 47% 39% 42% 48% 44% 32% 40% 44% 51% 40% 43% 45% P U B L I C O P I N I O N S T R A T E G I E S
    • WORKPLACE WELLNESS INITIATIVES STUDY / 12430 / SEPTEMBER 2012 PAGE 186Table 61-3QUESTION HRP:For multi-unit organizations, are HR policies and practices determined by the multi-unit headquarters, by each work location, or a combination of both?BANNER 3 ------------------- AMONG THOSE WITH WELLNESS INITIATIVE --------------------- HAVE WELLNESS % OF YEARS FINANCIAL EMPLOYEE ACCESS INITATIVE OPERATING BUDGET IN OPERATION INCENTIVE ROI TO INITIATIVE =========== ================= ================= =========== =========== ================== 6% OR 1-2 3-4 5+ TOTAL YES NO 0-1% 2-5% MORE YRS YRS YRS YES NO YES NO 0-74% 75-84% 85%+ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ -----BASE=MULTI-UNIT 260 165 95 57 49 19 54 34 64 91 74 79 82 16 10 127 100% 63% 37% 35% 30% 12% 33% 21% 39% 55% 45% 48% 50% 10% 6% 77%MULTI-UNIT CORPORATE 139 88 51 34 28 8 30 21 33 50 38 42 44 5 5 74HEADQUARTERS 53% 53% 54% 60% 57% 42% 56% 62% 52% 55% 51% 53% 54% 31% 50% 58%EACH WORK LOCATION 5 2 3 1 - - - 1 - 1 1 - 2 - - 1 2% 1% 3% 2% - - - 3% - 1% 1% - 2% - - 1%A COMBINATION OF BOTH 116 75 41 22 21 11 24 12 31 40 35 37 36 11 5 52 45% 45% 43% 39% 43% 58% 44% 35% 48% 44% 47% 47% 44% 69% 50% 41% P U B L I C O P I N I O N S T R A T E G I E S
    • WORKPLACE WELLNESS INITIATIVES STUDY / 12430 / SEPTEMBER 2012 PAGE 187Table 62-1QUESTION HRLVL:Whats the level of HR department/function for which you responded throughout this survey?BANNER 1 ORG HEALTH ORGANIZATION SIZE PROFIT STATUS REGION EMPLOYEES W/ CARE YEARS IN OPERATION GRADE ================= ================= ======================= ================== ======================= =========== NON- 100- PRIV- PUB- PROF/ NORTH MID- 0-10 11-20 21-50 51+ TOTAL 1-99 499 500+ ATE LIC GOVT -EAST SOUTH WEST WEST 0-74% 75-84% 85%+ YRS YRS YRS YRS A/B C/D/F ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----BASE=MULTI-UNIT 260 29 79 152 117 71 72 43 82 90 45 74 52 106 26 35 94 92 136 123 ORGANIZATION 100% 11% 30% 58% 45% 27% 28% 17% 32% 35% 17% 28% 20% 41% 10% 13% 36% 35% 52% 47%CORPORATE [COMPANY WIDE] 170 25 68 77 81 29 60 30 57 54 29 47 33 72 19 27 62 56 86 83 65% 86% 86% 51% 69% 41% 83% 70% 70% 60% 64% 64% 63% 68% 73% 77% 66% 61% 63% 67%BUSINESS UNIT/DIVISION 41 1 4 36 13 21 7 8 12 13 8 14 11 13 2 4 17 15 25 16 16% 3% 5% 24% 11% 30% 10% 19% 15% 14% 18% 19% 21% 12% 8% 11% 18% 16% 18% 13%FACILITY/LOCATION 49 3 7 39 23 21 5 5 13 23 8 13 8 21 5 4 15 21 25 24 19% 10% 9% 26% 20% 30% 7% 12% 16% 26% 18% 18% 15% 20% 19% 11% 16% 23% 18% 20% P U B L I C O P I N I O N S T R A T E G I E S
    • WORKPLACE WELLNESS INITIATIVES STUDY / 12430 / SEPTEMBER 2012 PAGE 188Table 62-2QUESTION HRLVL:Whats the level of HR department/function for which you responded throughout this survey?BANNER 2 WELLNESS ROLE OF IMPORTANT ISSUES (%10) HEALTH CONCERNS (COMBINED) - BENEFICIAL STATE/LOCAL GOVT ROLE OF FED GOVT ======================== =============================== ================= ================= ================= DECR LACK HIGH NOT INSU- PROD- WORK- OBES- STRESS OF CHRON BLOOD VERY/ MORE LESS NO MORE LESS NO RANCE UCTI- ABSEN- ERS ITY/ /MEN- FIT- DIS- PRE- AT ACT- ACT- CHAN- ACT- ACT- CHAN- TOTAL COSTS VITY TEEISM COMP WEIGHT TAL NESS EASE SSURE VERY SMWT ALL IVE IVE GE IVE IVE GE ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ------ ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----BASE=MULTI-UNIT 260 122 91 70 69 143 142 126 82 100 108 124 28 118 41 96 94 53 104 ORGANIZATION 100% 47% 35% 27% 27% 55% 55% 48% 32% 38% 42% 48% 11% 45% 16% 37% 36% 20% 40%CORPORATE [COMPANY WIDE] 170 78 53 41 37 96 93 77 57 66 77 73 20 81 23 61 67 33 66 65% 64% 58% 59% 54% 67% 65% 61% 70% 66% 71% 59% 71% 69% 56% 64% 71% 62% 63%BUSINESS UNIT/DIVISION 41 20 14 13 14 25 22 25 13 13 14 24 3 15 10 16 11 10 17 16% 16% 15% 19% 20% 17% 15% 20% 16% 13% 13% 19% 11% 13% 24% 17% 12% 19% 16%FACILITY/LOCATION 49 24 24 16 18 22 27 24 12 21 17 27 5 22 8 19 16 10 21 19% 20% 26% 23% 26% 15% 19% 19% 15% 21% 16% 22% 18% 19% 20% 20% 17% 19% 20% P U B L I C O P I N I O N S T R A T E G I E S
    • WORKPLACE WELLNESS INITIATIVES STUDY / 12430 / SEPTEMBER 2012 PAGE 189Table 62-3QUESTION HRLVL:Whats the level of HR department/function for which you responded throughout this survey?BANNER 3 ------------------- AMONG THOSE WITH WELLNESS INITIATIVE --------------------- HAVE WELLNESS % OF YEARS FINANCIAL EMPLOYEE ACCESS INITATIVE OPERATING BUDGET IN OPERATION INCENTIVE ROI TO INITIATIVE =========== ================= ================= =========== =========== ================== 6% OR 1-2 3-4 5+ TOTAL YES NO 0-1% 2-5% MORE YRS YRS YRS YES NO YES NO 0-74% 75-84% 85%+ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ -----BASE=MULTI-UNIT 260 165 95 57 49 19 54 34 64 91 74 79 82 16 10 127 ORGANIZATION 100% 63% 37% 35% 30% 12% 33% 21% 39% 55% 45% 48% 50% 10% 6% 77%CORPORATE [COMPANY WIDE] 170 103 67 45 26 11 41 20 37 58 45 44 59 8 3 86 65% 62% 71% 79% 53% 58% 76% 59% 58% 64% 61% 56% 72% 50% 30% 68%BUSINESS UNIT/DIVISION 41 31 10 6 14 2 5 8 15 16 15 17 11 6 6 17 16% 19% 11% 11% 29% 11% 9% 24% 23% 18% 20% 22% 13% 38% 60% 13%FACILITY/LOCATION 49 31 18 6 9 6 8 6 12 17 14 18 12 2 1 24 19% 19% 19% 11% 18% 32% 15% 18% 19% 19% 19% 23% 15% 13% 10% 19% P U B L I C O P I N I O N S T R A T E G I E S