Using a virtual learning environment (Second Life) to deliver simulation education - Presentation Transcript
Dr. Jacqueline McCallum, Val Ness, Theresa Price, Andy Whiteford School of Nursing, Midwifery & Community Health July 2009 Using a virtual learning environment (Second Life) to deliver simulation education
The Results The team and avatars
Need to teach decision-making skills in nursing
Clinical simulation laboratory stretched to capacity
Glasgow Caledonian University bought an island on Second Life
Dedicated support team for Second Life
Background
Research Questions
1.To progress students beyond using Second Life for social networking and explore their experience of this learning environment.
2. To explore the use of Second Life to develop Non-Technical skills in nursing such as decision-making.
The Study
Caledonian University Saltire Centre created on Second Life university island
Inside the Saltire centre
The real CSL - add photo from my desktop at work
The real clinical simulation laboratory
The virtual clinical simulation laboratory on Second Life
Action Research
Ethical approval gained from School ethics committee
Access granted from the Dean, programme leader and module leader
350 students invited to participate
12 Replied and were given information sheet
6 consented to the study and attended training
5 completed the study (1 withdrew)
Methodology & Method
Qualitative Data analysis exploring decisions made
Written communication transcripts form the simulation
Qualitative one-to-one interviews after the simulation
Transcribed by one researcher
Analysed using Dieklemann finding themes
Methodology & Method
Six patients
report given using SBAR
One hour working in the Second Life CSL
Assisted by a nurse avatar (researcher)
Patients controlled by 2 nurse lecturers remotely
The Simulation
The patients
May
Colin
Willie
Laura
Anne
Precilla
The Simulation
Most proactive with Anne
Possible due to feeling competent at wound care
Least proactive with Colin, who has just returned from theatre
The Results - text May Laura William Colin Precilla Anne Proactive 1 2 2 0 1 3 Reactive 4 3 3 5 4 2 Delegated 4 5 5 5 5 5
The Results - interview
Theme 1
Theme 2
More reactive than proactive with decisions – links to them stating they do not get experience on clinical placement
No analytical decision-making, didn’t use any charts, e.g. EWS, pre-op checklist
Delegated a great deal – had some experience of this on clinical placement
Recognised the sick patient, but no assessment conducted
Simulation on Second Life made them realise that they were doing decision-making
Ignored May most of the time – not seen as a priority patient
0 comments
Post a comment