SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 3
Free enterprise, competition at the market-place, and Adam Smith's "Invisible
           Hand" made the United States the world's foremost economy.

                                      By Heather Brock




       After reading the text and related materials it is my understanding that the way

our country formed in the beginning and subsequent historical events that took place gave

the United States a boom into becoming a prosperous leading world economy. After

America gained it’s independence from Britain, we were a country who grew rapidly,

both financially and in population.

               We were a country that was based on free enterprise and the hopes and

dreams of freedom, not just religious freedom, but personal financial freedoms limited

only by the creativity of the individuals who came and helped build and established our

country.

       The early court systems favored competitive national markets and many laws

were passed that promoted competition and squashed monopolies. Even in areas of

transportations, ferries competed with bridges, railroads with canals and today airplanes

and trucks compete.

       Because we were a new and underdeveloped country, we began with unlimited

natural resources. Land was plentiful, and people came and migrated developing the West

as they moved throughout the country seeking their own financial wealth in farming and

other areas which profited society as a whole.

       The south’s cotton is a great example of this. They used slaves as rent-seeking

behavior to keep their costs down and their profits high. When technology came with the
cotton gin, we saw a remarkable market for being able to mass produce cotton and sell

and trade it internationally. According the text American Economic History, they

provided data we were the leading country in cotton exports. We became very productive

in farming and excelled in many areas that kept up with the world’s ever changing

technology.

       Within our country, because there was free enterprise and competition in the

market place due to a non- monopolistic attitude, people serving their own interests

boosted the economy without meaning to do so.

       Adam Smith in his “Invisible Hand” describes it best in his book when he writes “

“...every individual necessarily labours to render the annual revenue of the

society as great as he can. He generally, indeed, neither intends to promote the

public interest, nor knows how much he is promoting it. By preferring the

support of domestic to that of foreign industry, he intends only his own security;

and by directing that industry in such a manner as its produce may be of the

greatest value, he intends only his own gain, and he is in this, as in many other

cases, led by an invisible hand to promote an end which was no part of his

intention. Nor is it always the worse for the society that it was no part of it. By

pursuing his own interest he frequently promotes that of the society more

effectually than when he really intends to promote it. I have never known much

good done by those who affected to trade for the public good”

       According to the video Vol. 2, "The Tyranny of Control, several important

things are pointed out. The first being is that open markets lead to low prices, good

quality products and high wages. When government gets involved to protect those who

feel they do have fair advantage, society as a whole suffers.
Free market competition is what made our country the foremost country in

economics. Being open to competition and staying active is essential to our economic

welfare. Government does play a role in providing stability and fairness. But as the video

points out that governments can and do go too far in controlling markets.

       We see in our own country’s history where after the stock market crash in 1929

and the great depression that followed where too much control and government

regulation hindered our country’s economic welfare and recovery.

       In other countries we see where government control keeps people from using up

to date technology, which limits productivity, free enterprise isn’t even an option and the

people remain poor and burdened and the whole society suffers. Their country is not able

to compete with the global market.

       Free enterprise and competition at the market place is healthy for stimulating an

economy. Adam Smith’s opinion really makes an impression and logical sense that by

people looking out for their own best interests and buying domestically, individuals

inadvertently serve society as a whole.

       When products and services are no longer able to compete they die out and new

ideas are born and the whole process seems to even itself out.

       Having this openness to free trade and healthy competition backed with

government support, not control, pushed our country above the rest who hold to their

monopolistic ideals and communistic ideals.

More Related Content

Viewers also liked (14)

Ross4e chap16smpart
Ross4e chap16smpartRoss4e chap16smpart
Ross4e chap16smpart
 
Presentatie Stichting base 4 life
Presentatie Stichting base 4 lifePresentatie Stichting base 4 life
Presentatie Stichting base 4 life
 
Alert util
Alert utilAlert util
Alert util
 
Brak ili sloboda smesno
Brak ili sloboda smesnoBrak ili sloboda smesno
Brak ili sloboda smesno
 
Introducing Yeoman 1.0 beta
Introducing Yeoman 1.0 betaIntroducing Yeoman 1.0 beta
Introducing Yeoman 1.0 beta
 
اعظم ها جر عصامالاشخاص
اعظم ها جر عصامالاشخاصاعظم ها جر عصامالاشخاص
اعظم ها جر عصامالاشخاص
 
Borderline Personality Disorder
Borderline Personality DisorderBorderline Personality Disorder
Borderline Personality Disorder
 
الافكار
الافكارالافكار
الافكار
 
الافكار
الافكارالافكار
الافكار
 
6 צעדים לאתר בית ספר טוב
6 צעדים לאתר בית ספר טוב6 צעדים לאתר בית ספר טוב
6 צעדים לאתר בית ספר טוב
 
Indo mim company profile
Indo mim company profileIndo mim company profile
Indo mim company profile
 
Metodología de desarrollo de software basada en componentes
Metodología de desarrollo de software basada en componentesMetodología de desarrollo de software basada en componentes
Metodología de desarrollo de software basada en componentes
 
Borderline Personality Disorder
Borderline Personality DisorderBorderline Personality Disorder
Borderline Personality Disorder
 
Patient congestion in ED
Patient congestion in EDPatient congestion in ED
Patient congestion in ED
 

Similar to Free enterpris1

Document #1 History of the Economic Systems and TheoriesC
Document #1 History of the Economic Systems and TheoriesCDocument #1 History of the Economic Systems and TheoriesC
Document #1 History of the Economic Systems and TheoriesC
DustiBuckner14
 
powerpoint.12
powerpoint.12powerpoint.12
powerpoint.12
rebwball
 

Similar to Free enterpris1 (9)

Document #1 History of the Economic Systems and TheoriesC
Document #1 History of the Economic Systems and TheoriesCDocument #1 History of the Economic Systems and TheoriesC
Document #1 History of the Economic Systems and TheoriesC
 
Why Does Economic Freedom Matter?
Why Does Economic Freedom Matter?Why Does Economic Freedom Matter?
Why Does Economic Freedom Matter?
 
powerpoint.12
powerpoint.12powerpoint.12
powerpoint.12
 
010 Essay My Life Future Plan Me And Plans Of Stu
010 Essay My Life Future Plan Me And Plans Of Stu010 Essay My Life Future Plan Me And Plans Of Stu
010 Essay My Life Future Plan Me And Plans Of Stu
 
School Essay Conclusion For A Compare And Contrast Essay
School Essay Conclusion For A Compare And Contrast EssaySchool Essay Conclusion For A Compare And Contrast Essay
School Essay Conclusion For A Compare And Contrast Essay
 
Top 10 greatest benefits of capitalism
Top 10 greatest benefits of capitalismTop 10 greatest benefits of capitalism
Top 10 greatest benefits of capitalism
 
Capitalism
CapitalismCapitalism
Capitalism
 
Capitalism
CapitalismCapitalism
Capitalism
 
Capitalism
CapitalismCapitalism
Capitalism
 

Free enterpris1

  • 1. Free enterprise, competition at the market-place, and Adam Smith's "Invisible Hand" made the United States the world's foremost economy. By Heather Brock After reading the text and related materials it is my understanding that the way our country formed in the beginning and subsequent historical events that took place gave the United States a boom into becoming a prosperous leading world economy. After America gained it’s independence from Britain, we were a country who grew rapidly, both financially and in population. We were a country that was based on free enterprise and the hopes and dreams of freedom, not just religious freedom, but personal financial freedoms limited only by the creativity of the individuals who came and helped build and established our country. The early court systems favored competitive national markets and many laws were passed that promoted competition and squashed monopolies. Even in areas of transportations, ferries competed with bridges, railroads with canals and today airplanes and trucks compete. Because we were a new and underdeveloped country, we began with unlimited natural resources. Land was plentiful, and people came and migrated developing the West as they moved throughout the country seeking their own financial wealth in farming and other areas which profited society as a whole. The south’s cotton is a great example of this. They used slaves as rent-seeking behavior to keep their costs down and their profits high. When technology came with the
  • 2. cotton gin, we saw a remarkable market for being able to mass produce cotton and sell and trade it internationally. According the text American Economic History, they provided data we were the leading country in cotton exports. We became very productive in farming and excelled in many areas that kept up with the world’s ever changing technology. Within our country, because there was free enterprise and competition in the market place due to a non- monopolistic attitude, people serving their own interests boosted the economy without meaning to do so. Adam Smith in his “Invisible Hand” describes it best in his book when he writes “ “...every individual necessarily labours to render the annual revenue of the society as great as he can. He generally, indeed, neither intends to promote the public interest, nor knows how much he is promoting it. By preferring the support of domestic to that of foreign industry, he intends only his own security; and by directing that industry in such a manner as its produce may be of the greatest value, he intends only his own gain, and he is in this, as in many other cases, led by an invisible hand to promote an end which was no part of his intention. Nor is it always the worse for the society that it was no part of it. By pursuing his own interest he frequently promotes that of the society more effectually than when he really intends to promote it. I have never known much good done by those who affected to trade for the public good” According to the video Vol. 2, "The Tyranny of Control, several important things are pointed out. The first being is that open markets lead to low prices, good quality products and high wages. When government gets involved to protect those who feel they do have fair advantage, society as a whole suffers.
  • 3. Free market competition is what made our country the foremost country in economics. Being open to competition and staying active is essential to our economic welfare. Government does play a role in providing stability and fairness. But as the video points out that governments can and do go too far in controlling markets. We see in our own country’s history where after the stock market crash in 1929 and the great depression that followed where too much control and government regulation hindered our country’s economic welfare and recovery. In other countries we see where government control keeps people from using up to date technology, which limits productivity, free enterprise isn’t even an option and the people remain poor and burdened and the whole society suffers. Their country is not able to compete with the global market. Free enterprise and competition at the market place is healthy for stimulating an economy. Adam Smith’s opinion really makes an impression and logical sense that by people looking out for their own best interests and buying domestically, individuals inadvertently serve society as a whole. When products and services are no longer able to compete they die out and new ideas are born and the whole process seems to even itself out. Having this openness to free trade and healthy competition backed with government support, not control, pushed our country above the rest who hold to their monopolistic ideals and communistic ideals.