Private Label By Dr.Hitesh Gaur

Loading...

Flash Player 9 (or above) is needed to view presentations.
We have detected that you do not have it on your computer. To install it, go here.

0 comments

Post a comment

    Post a comment
    Embed Video
    Edit your comment Cancel

    3 Favorites

    Private Label By Dr.Hitesh Gaur - Presentation Transcript

    1. Private Label Brands: Encroaching the big brands share November 24, 2008 By: Dr.Hitesh Gaur
      • I. The Apparel Private Label Paradigm
      • II. National Apparel Brands Counter Strategy
      • III. The Future of Apparel Private Labels
      • IV. Indian Scenerio
    2. Source: adapted from Cotton Inc.
      • Worldwide Private Label retail sales have passed US$1 trillion
      • 2006 US apparel & shoes retail sales: $358.6 Billion
      • 2006: 45% apparel sales were private label
      • 2005: 39% apparel sales were private label
      • 2002: 35% apparel sales were private label
      • By 2010, private label merchandise expects to increase by 22% to 55% of total apparel sales
      Source: US Dept of Commerce, expand on May 2007 Apparel and Textile News
      • Consolidation of retailers
      • Brands sell to same retailers and become a commodity
      • Retailers need differentiation and better margin
      • Declining retail prices (women’s apparel prices dropped 2.4% 2007 vs. ‘06)
      • Globalization of Production
    3. From 1996 to 2006, the average retail price declined a minimum of 9% Source: adapted and expanded from Cotton Inc. winter 2003 Product % Change Retail Channel % Change Total -8.9 Total -8.9 Jeans -5.5 Department -13.7 Slacks -11.7 National Chain -9.0 Shorts -4.9 Specialty -5.8 Sweat Apparel -12.6 Mass merchant -7.5 Shirts -8.1 Off-price -4.2 Sweaters -16.3 Other -11.2 Shirts/Dresses -6.1
      • Imitate designer brands to reduce R&D costs
      • Source direct with factories to eliminate middlemen cost
      • Buy in larger volume to receive lower cost
      • Source from low cost, duty and/or quota free countries: China, India, Bangladesh, Vietnam, Pakistan, South & Central America, Africa
      How do retailers achieve low PL prices?
      • Generic –very promotional, very low margin, Conway, Walgreen
      • Fast Value Fashion – knock-off brands, Zara and H &M
      • Premium Store Brands – Retailer’s own brand offers same or better quality at better price. The most profitable strategy in private label.
        • Highly competitive - same or better quality at
      • better prices, average 37% less than national brands
        • Higher Gross Margins (est. 58 – 68%)
        • Higher selling price per square foot than other
        • Private label strategies
        • Biggest threat to national brands
        • Brand Loyalty
      What is the preferred PL strategy? See Appendix 2
    4. *Sales in billions include all private label & exclusive products Macy’s percentage includes 18% private label and 15% exclusive merchandise Retailer 2006 Total Sales Private Label % to total sales Private Label Sales in USD * JC Penney $19.9 50% $9.95 Kohl’s $15.5 35% $5.42 Wal-Mart $312.4 40% $124.96 Macy’s $27 33% $ 8.9 Target $59.5 32% $19.4
      • JC Penney’s – a.n.a., Arizona, Ambrielle
      • Macy’s - INC, Alfani, Style & Co
      • Wal-Mart - Faded Glory, George
      • Target - Mossimo, Circo
      • Kohl’s - Urban Pipeline, Sonoma, Apt 9
      • Combined effort, a win-win strategy:
      • American Living, Simply Vera, Isaac Mizrahi
      • One time exclusive deal – H & M, Target
      • Blending in with Premium brands - INC, Arizona
      • Marriage with a celebrity name – Sarah Jessica Parker, Hilary Duff
      • Develop unique products and stay ahead as a trend leader
      • Create own stores
      • Develop a compelling marketing strategy
      • Increase brand loyalty
      • Combine effort by offering exclusive lines. I.e, Simply Vera, American Living, Liz & Co
      • Create one shot exclusive deliveries and SKUS
      • Evaluate sourcing strategy and production cost
      • Maintain net price (minimal promotions & discounts)
      • Improve forecasting and turn around time
      • Becoming national premium lifestyle brands: INC, Alfani, Arizona
      • Branching out to create specialty chain business: George apparel stores, Wal-Mart, UK
      • Increasing depth of multi dimensional merchandising product mix (Tony Hawk mens, boys, footwear and etc)
      • Spin off PL brands (Aeropostale)
      • Cannibalize weaker PL brands
      • PROS
      • Exclusivity & differentiation
      • Bring customer loyalty
      • Better margin
      • Better control in deliveries
      • Brand equity
      • Freedom in pricing strategy
      • Increase bargaining power with both national brands and PL factories
      • CONS
      • Inventory risk
      • Higher R&D expense
      • Higher marketing expense
      • No markdown or return allowance from branded suppliers
      • If product fails, will create negative image
      • Quality control, complex production & import issues
      • KOHL’S
        • New Launches– Simply Vera by Vera Wang, Elle Apparel, Food Network Kitchen estimated growth rate 6-7% for 2 nd half of 2007
        • Tony Hawk, board-sports inspired, a hot category
      • JC PENNEY
        • American Living by Ralph Lauren 2008
        • C7P – Chip & Pepper Denim 2007
        • Liz & Co
        • Arizona - $1 billion lifestyle premium brand
      • MACY’S
        • INC, Alfani, Style & Co, Martha Stewart, Field Gear, Epic Threads
      • WAL-MART *
        • George - $3 billion men’s urban fashion
        • Faded Glory - $3 billion lifestyle premium brand
      *Wal-Mart figures represent worldwide sales
      • To differentiate
      • To gain and maintain consumer loyalty
      • To achieve higher gross margin
      • To compete with national brands
      I. Retailers believe private brands are their strategy:
    5. II. National brands should: What This Means
      • Change mind set and realize that Private Labels are
      • competing brands
      • Innovate and stay as market leaders to beat PL
      • Stay focused on target audience
      • Increase and market brand imagery to gain and maintain
      • customer loyalty
      • Partner with retailers to produce exclusive brands,
      • SKUS, one-time offers or lines
      • Price competitively and streamline expenses
    6. III. Future of private labels:
      • Private brands will continue to play an important part of the assortment to their growth strategy
      • Become national lifestyle premium brands
      • Deploy a multi-layer strategy in brand, price and quality
      • Cannibalize weaker private and national brands
      What This Means
    7. Average price gap 37% based on quality equivalent categories Average price gap 21% based on national brand’s quality is perceived to be less than private label brands. Private Label Brands Retail $ Gross Margin National Brands Retail $ Gross Margin Price Difference betw. Brands INC (Macy’s) Dresses $79-129.00 GM 60-69% BCBG Dresses $158-178 GM 48-56% 37% Alfani (Macy’s) Men’s Polo $34.50-42.0 GM 58-68% Nautica Men’s Polo $45-55 GM 50-54% 30-39% Faded Glory (Wal-Mart) Denim $10.77-14.42 GM 38-54% Levi’s Denim For Wal-Mart $19.68 GM 45-48% 37% Sonoma (Kohl's) Menswear $ 16-28.00 GM 60-62% Dickie’s, Shady’s & etc $16 – 40.00 GM 40 – 48% 20 –25%
    8. 06/06/09
      • Jade Blue
      • Mochi Ka Juta
      • Food Bazaar
      • Pantaloon
      • Westside
      • Naturals
      • Reliance fresh
      • Patidar
      • Shree ji
      • Induben-Khakhrawala
    9. Contract PL manufacturing company
      • Balsara enterprises:
      • Contract PL manufacturing company
      • Colgate Palmolive
      • Beecham Group
      • Henkel Cosmetics
      • Reckitt & Colman
      • Vasa Cosmetics :

    + hatterdudehatterdude, 2 years ago

    custom

    970 views, 3 favs, 1 embeds more stats

    this is presentation depicting the current scenerio more

    More info about this document

    © All Rights Reserved

    Go to text version

    • Total Views 970
      • 965 on SlideShare
      • 5 from embeds
    • Comments 0
    • Favorites 3
    • Downloads 5
    Most viewed embeds
    • 5 views on http://discussion.academyart.edu

    more

    All embeds
    • 5 views on http://discussion.academyart.edu

    less

    Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
    Flag as inappropriate

    Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate. If needed, use the feedback form to let us know more details.

    Cancel
    File a copyright complaint
    Having problems? Go to our helpdesk?

    Categories