AROOC 2012 Presentation

  • 354 views
Uploaded on

 

More in: Education
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Be the first to comment
    Be the first to like this
No Downloads

Views

Total Views
354
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
0

Actions

Shares
Downloads
1
Comments
0
Likes
0

Embeds 0

No embeds

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
    No notes for slide
  • The Open Course Library is a collection of expertly developed educational materials – including textbooks, syllabi, course activities, readings, and assessments – for 81 high-enrollment college courses. 42 courses have been completed so far, providing faculty with a high-quality option that will cost students no more than $30 per course.
  • OCW はコースがベース、粒度が大きい   OER は自由にこれを設定できる。  どちらがよいかはケースバイケース コースマテリアルの断片の場合から、完全なコース講義のビデオまで様々な形態のマテリアルがある、そのため、一概にどうかとは言えないが、そのまま使えるものは少ないのではないか。 たとえば、 Instructables
  • OCW はコースがベース、粒度が大きい   OER は自由にこれを設定できる。  どちらがよいかはケースバイケース コースマテリアルの断片の場合から、完全なコース講義のビデオまで様々な形態のマテリアルがある、そのため、一概にどうかとは言えないが、そのまま使えるものは少ないのではないか。 たとえば、 Instructables
  • OCW はコースがベース、粒度が大きい   OER は自由にこれを設定できる。  どちらがよいかはケースバイケース コースマテリアルの断片の場合から、完全なコース講義のビデオまで様々な形態のマテリアルがある、そのため、一概にどうかとは言えないが、そのまま使えるものは少ないのではないか。 たとえば、 Instructables
  • OCW はコースがベース、粒度が大きい   OER は自由にこれを設定できる。  どちらがよいかはケースバイケース コースマテリアルの断片の場合から、完全なコース講義のビデオまで様々な形態のマテリアルがある、そのため、一概にどうかとは言えないが、そのまま使えるものは少ないのではないか。 たとえば、 Instructables
  • OCW はコースがベース、粒度が大きい   OER は自由にこれを設定できる。  どちらがよいかはケースバイケース コースマテリアルの断片の場合から、完全なコース講義のビデオまで様々な形態のマテリアルがある、そのため、一概にどうかとは言えないが、そのまま使えるものは少ないのではないか。 たとえば、 Instructables
  • OCW はコースがベース、粒度が大きい   OER は自由にこれを設定できる。  どちらがよいかはケースバイケース コースマテリアルの断片の場合から、完全なコース講義のビデオまで様々な形態のマテリアルがある、そのため、一概にどうかとは言えないが、そのまま使えるものは少ないのではないか。 たとえば、 Instructables
  • OCW はコースがベース、粒度が大きい   OER は自由にこれを設定できる。  どちらがよいかはケースバイケース コースマテリアルの断片の場合から、完全なコース講義のビデオまで様々な形態のマテリアルがある、そのため、一概にどうかとは言えないが、そのまま使えるものは少ないのではないか。 たとえば、 Instructables
  • OCW はコースがベース、粒度が大きい   OER は自由にこれを設定できる。  どちらがよいかはケースバイケース コースマテリアルの断片の場合から、完全なコース講義のビデオまで様々な形態のマテリアルがある、そのため、一概にどうかとは言えないが、そのまま使えるものは少ないのではないか。 たとえば、 Instructables
  • OCW はコースがベース、粒度が大きい   OER は自由にこれを設定できる。  どちらがよいかはケースバイケース コースマテリアルの断片の場合から、完全なコース講義のビデオまで様々な形態のマテリアルがある、そのため、一概にどうかとは言えないが、そのまま使えるものは少ないのではないか。 たとえば、 Instructables
  • 2012/11/29

Transcript

  • 1. Role of OCW in Open Education Era Haruo Takemura Cybermedia Center, Osaka UniversityPresident, Japan OpenCourseWare ConsotiumBoard Member, OpenCourseWare Consotium
  • 2. Outline What is OCW Current status of JOCW Current status of OCWC OCW in relation to OER OCW and Globalization in Education 2
  • 3. OUTLINE 2 OCW ⊂   OER OPEN  ≠  FREE OPEN  ≠  Reusable 3
  • 4. advancing formal and informal learning through the worldwide sharing and use of free, open, high-quality education materials organized as courses.What is OpenCourseWare?An OpenCourseWare (OCW) is a free and open digital publicationof high quality college and university‐level educational materials.These materials are organized as courses, and often includecourse planning materials and evaluation tools as well as thematiccontent. OpenCourseWare are free and openly licensed,accessible to anyone, anytime via the internet.OCW  ≒  Free Textbook + α  ?
  • 5. What is OpenCourseWare ? Collection of course materials used for university courses published by individual universities. Text book, PPT slides, Hand out, video etc. Not always designed for on-line learning. Not all courses of participating universities are published. 5
  • 6. Japan OpenCourseWare consortium Started on May 13, 2005 as Japan OpenCourseWare Alliance. In year 2006, JOCW officially established. 6
  • 7. 会員数 Members of JOCW43 organizations ( 23 univs. 、 4 NPOs 、 16 companies )
  • 8. Courses from JOCW
  • 9. Visitors to all JOCW sites OCWC Global 2011
  • 10. Courses from JOCW Most of them are in Japanese (2,500 out of 3,000)  Because most of courses taught in Japanese Universities are in Japanese.  Is this good or bad?  Global point of view  Little impact on learners who do not understand Japanese  Local point of view  Good for Japanese learners  In Japan, Life long learning or recurrent education are not popular yet.  Nice show case of university education. 10
  • 11. advancing formal and informal learning through the worldwide sharing and use of free, open, high-quality education materials organized as courses. OpenCourseWare ConsortiumThe OCW Consortium is a worldwide community of hundreds ofuniversities and associated organizations committed to advancingOpenCourseWare and its impact on global education. We serveas a resource for starting and sustaining OCW projects, as acoordinating body for the movement on a global scale, and as aforum for exchange of ideas and future planning.
  • 12. 1 %21% 22% 32% 7% 2 % 1% 13% 1% Over 250 institutions and organizations worldwide supporting open sharing in education
  • 13. OCW growth
  • 14. OCW part of the Open Movement • OCW is only one type of Open Educational Resource (OER). Open Content • OERs are only one type of Open Content. Open Educational Resources • We have much to share with each other. OCW 15
  • 15. What is Value of OCW• For Universities • A show case of their education • Contribution to the society• For Students • Resource for deciding which classes to take. • Self-learning materials.• For Faculty • Resource for Faculty Development• For Prospective Students • Recourse for deicing which university to study.• For Alumni
  • 16. Discussions OCW v.s. OER Is OCW Ready for Open Education ? QA issue of OCW Emerging O.E. markets Cost effectiveness of OER and OCW Will OCW/OER speed up advancement in Higher Education? The role of IT in OCW/OER MOOCs (Massive Open Online Course) v.s. Universities 17
  • 17. Discussions OCW v.s. OER  OCW is designed based on University courses.  OER has no such a restrictions.  OCW is usually maintained by a single contributor  OER may have different strategies 18
  • 18. Discussions Is OCW Ready for Open Education ?  OCW based on a face to face lecture contents lacks in teaching.  OCW based on a face to face lecture video lacks in feedback or bi-directional communication between a instructor and students.  OCW is not modular based contents.  Meta Data is missing 19
  • 19. 20
  • 20. 21
  • 21. Discussions QA issue of OCW  Publishing courses under the name of a University self- regulate their quality.  There is no formal review process in many cases  Connexions or MERLOT may have better strategies ? 22
  • 22. Discussions Emerging O.E. markets  Open Education in many cases are not Free Education.  Who is going to pay costs for Open Education?  Government ?  Students ?  Course providers ? 23
  • 23. Discussions Cost effectiveness of OER and OCW  ICT serves to reduce the cost for delivering courses  Cost for copying  Cost for delivering  Cost for producing  How about cost for teaching, testing and communicating? 24
  • 24. Discussions Will OCW/OER speed up advancement in Higher Education?  Have Open Source Software speeded up advancement in Software Development ? -- Yes or Maybe  This may not true for OCW/OER, because  Revising curse contents is much more complicated than programming.  Programming has less cultural issues than education.  Programming is much more self-descriptive than course contents. 25
  • 25. Discussions The role of IT in OCW/OER  Course publication  LMS, CMS integration.  Use of cloud base services 26
  • 26. Discussions MOOCs (Massive Open Online Course) v.s. Universities  Are MOOCs Open Education?  Yes, they are open to public but not always free.  Why many top level universities are interested in MOOCs  Large test bed for pedagogical study.  Good way to find out potential students. 27
  • 27. Conclusion OCW contents needs to be redesigned so that the contents can be reused in various forms. Use of IT from the design of a course may improve the situation. Module based course design can be achieved with help of good authoring software. Lecture capture with automated caption and translation may help a lot to reduce production costs of OCW. Pedagogical approach is essential for success.  Technology oriented strategy may stall at some point.
  • 28. Trent Strohm rexboggs5 wYnand! Global Conference 2013Bali, Indonesia8 -10 May 2013
  • 29. Thank your for your attention. Any Questions? http://www.slideshare.net/haruotakemura 31