Ipe09
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×
 

Ipe09

on

  • 316 views

 

Statistics

Views

Total Views
316
Views on SlideShare
316
Embed Views
0

Actions

Likes
0
Downloads
0
Comments
0

0 Embeds 0

No embeds

Accessibility

Categories

Upload Details

Uploaded via as Microsoft PowerPoint

Usage Rights

© All Rights Reserved

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Processing…
Post Comment
Edit your comment

Ipe09 Ipe09 Presentation Transcript

  • Y376 International Political Economy February 8, 2012
  • North-South Aid Issues: What the Developing Countries Want
    • Increasing the total amount
    • Untying “tied” aid
    • Increasing the proportion of aid channeled through multilateral agencies
    • Making aid more automatic
    • Giving LDCs more control over the spending of aid
  • What is Aid (Official Development Assistance)?
    • Undertaken by governments
    • Main objective to promote economic development and welfare
    • Made on concessional terms with a grant element of at least 25 percent
  • Figure 6-1. Annual Bilateral ODA by the G-5 Countries, 1960-2007, in Billions of Constant 2006 Dollars Source: OECD Statistics online .
  • Figure 6-3. ODA from DAC Countries, OPEC, CMEA, and non-DAC Countries, 1956-2007, in Billions of Current Dollars Source: OECD Statistics Online.
  • ODA, 2000-2006
  • ODA by Major Donors, 2006
  • Aid as Percentage of GDP
  • Example of US Aid to Iraq
    • Infrastructure
      • Water
      • Electricity
    • Health system
    • Schools
    • Reconstruction
    • Elections
    Source: http://www.usaid.gov/iraq
  • US Aid to Iraq, 2004-2007
  • US Aid to Iraq in Comparison with Aid to Germany and Japan
  • Why Hasn’t US Aid to Iraq Worked?
    • Preference for US over Iraqi contractors (higher costs)
    • Huge proportion of spending went to private companies like Bechtel
    • US concentration on rebuilding oil fields and other infrastructure projects
    • Al Qaeda disruption of aid work, especially in the rebuilding of infrastructure
  • Table 6-2. U.S. Foreign Aid Programs, 2004 Source: Carol Lancaster and Ann Van Dusen, Organizing U.S. Foreign Aid (Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution, 2005), p. 14. Department Name of Program $Millions Department of State Refugee 756 International Organizations and Programs 320 ESF (policy) 3,263 NIS (distribution) 584 SEED (distribution) 442 HIV/AIDS (distribution) 488 Andean Counter-Drug 727 Treasury Department Contributions to Intl. Financial Institutions 1,383 Debt Relief 94 Dept. of Agriculture PL-480 II (budget) 1,185 USAID DA, child survival, disaster 4,511 MCA 994 Iraq Reconstruction 18,439 Other 1,000-1,500
  • Table 6-1. Bilateral Aid to Former Colonies, 1970-1994 Source: Alberto Alesina and David Dollar, “Who Gives Foreign Aid and Why? Journal of Economic Growth , 5 (March 2000), p. 37. Donor Former Colony Share of Total Aid (in percentages) Portugal 99.6 United Kingdom 78.0 France 57.0 Belgium 53.7 Netherlands 17.1
  • Summary
    • Aid flows are strongly influenced by former colonial relationships and power politics
    • Net aid flows do not always remain positive because some aid takes the form of loans that must be paid back
    • The US share of total aid to LDCs declined markedly over time
    • Aid is primarily needed to deal with poverty, disasters, and wars and cannot be used in general to promote long-term economic development